Review Reports
- Luisa M. Pastrana-Martínez*,
- Sergio Morales-Torres and
- Francisco J. Maldonado-Hódar
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The authors present their work on aromatization catalysts comparing Pt-carbon gel catalysts and oxy/carbide catalysts. The presentation of the results is adequate and the discussion is complete. I suggest the paper can be accepted in its present form.
Author Response
Answer: We acknowledge the reviewer for the positive comments about our work.
Reviewer 2 Report
The article shows the catalytic activity of different catalysts based on metal or metal oxide on carbon-based support.
The work needs some modifications and improvements within the presentation before being publishable.
In abstract, l.9-11 are not necessary (It should be a part of the introduction)
l.24-29 : Add references. The topic is of high industrial relevance. There are certainly reviews.
l.31-32 : How is chlorine added ? Not clear.
l. 49-50, 68-69, 78 : Add references
l. 64 : transferences ? Transfers, maybe ?
l.131-132 : Where are the data ? Any fig ?
According to all the obtained data within cracking and aromatization, there should be more explanations. What are exactly the detected compounds ? How were the values calculated ?
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx