Next Article in Journal
Anisotropic Magnetism in Gradient Porous Carbon Composite Aerogels
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of Surface Chemistry and Polyethylenimine Grafting in the Removal of Cr (VI) by Activated Carbons from Cashew Nut Shells
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Applications of Fluorinated Graphenes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Jackfruit Seed-Derived Nanoporous Carbons as the Electrode Material for Supercapacitors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
C
Volume 7
Issue 1
10.3390/c7010021
carbon-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comparative Study of Aromatization Catalysts: The Advantage of Hybrid Oxy/Carbides and Platinum-Catalysts Based on Carbon Gels

by
Luisa M. Pastrana-Martínez
*,
Sergio Morales-Torres
and
Francisco J. Maldonado-Hódar
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Avenida Fuente Nueva s/n, ES-18071 Granada, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
C 2021, 7(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/c7010021
Submission received: 22 January 2021 / Revised: 7 February 2021 / Accepted: 9 February 2021 / Published: 12 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Carbon-Derived Materials from Bioresources for Advanced Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This manuscript is focused on the relationship between sol-gel synthesis processes and the development of new active phases with fitted morphology, porosity and surface chemistry. The influence of the above parameters on the catalytic performance of the prepared materials for the aromatization of n-hexane to benzene is also evaluated. Different series of catalysts were prepared, either using noble metals (i.e., Pt) or metal oxides (i.e., Mo, W), as active phases. In both cases, the catalytic performance and stability of classical aromatization catalysts was significantly improved. Interesting one-pot carboreduction process of the metal oxide during carbonization is suggested as a real alternative for the preparation of high-performance aromatization catalysts, leading to the formation of less acidic and non-stoichiometric oxides and carbides.

1. Introduction

Aromatic hydrocarbons are in high demand because they are the main feedstock for the production of a wide range of products including pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, dyes or polymers. The aromatization of cheap and abundant light alkanes into aromatic ones has been an important and alternative reaction to oil thermal cracking for the last 50 years, allowing the preparation of high-octane gasoline blending components from naphtha, among others [1,2,3,4].
The development of new catalysts for the valorization of light alkanes by transformation into aromatic products is an important challenge from an economic and scientific point of view. Traditional catalysts such as Pt/Cl–Al2O3 have provided low performances for light alkane (C ≤ 7) aromatization and, moreover, they can be deactivated by loss of chlorine which is formed by decomposition along a reaction of the Cl– groups present in the solid catalysts. In fact, chlorine is added to the feed causing corrosion and safety hazards [5]. Zeolites have been used as alternative non-chlorinated catalysts. The best performance for C6 reforming to benzene was described using Pt supported on zeolite L exchanged with K (Pt/KL). These catalysts showed different characteristics including weak acidity, low coke formation, shape selectivity and resistance to sintering [6,7]. In previous works, we have also identified similar factors for Pt-supported catalysts on exchanged β-zeolites [8,9,10]. The exchange of zeolite with alkali or alkali-earth metals, namely Cs, induces textural changes, reducing the paraffin-adsorption capacity and the surface acidity, minimizing the coke formation and favoring the formation of small Pt clusters with specific Pt-support interactions, thus enhancing the aromatization yield.
Nowadays, the optimization of aromatization catalysts continues to be of great interest to the scientific community, as demonstrated by the high number of recent publications in this field [5,11,12,13,14]. Reforming of light alkanes is carried out using zeolites, mainly medium pore-size ZSM-5 zeolite which presents molecular shape selectivity towards benzene, toluene and xylene (BTX). Different promoters (mainly Ga, Zn and B) are used to enhance the aromatic yield by modifying the acidity of zeolite, favoring the alkane dehydrogenation and minimizing coke deposition.
In general, carbon materials present a basic character and a developed surface area and porosity, avoiding coke deposition and favoring the dispersion of supported metallic phases [15,16,17,18,19]. These properties could increase the performance of carbon-based catalysts in aromatization reactions. It was reported that high BTX yields can be obtained using Zn/HZSM5 catalysts for methanol aromatization, although deactivation by coking is strong. However, after regeneration, the residual of coke remaining on the zeolite surface can play an active role in the control of acidity, decreasing the acid sites’ strength and distribution, in such a way that regenerated catalysts show good BTX yields and improved stability [20].
The number of references using carbon materials to develop aromatization catalysts is quite limited. Rodríguez-Ramos [21] suggested that the aromatization of n-heptane on Pd/activated carbon catalysts is a structure-insensitive reaction. As the Pt particle size decreases, hydrogenolysis is favored, but some isomerization and aromatization remain unchanged even after doping with MgO to increase the number of basic sites. When Ru/graphite is used as catalyst, [22] the electronic density of Ru-nanoparticles is enhanced by electron transfer from graphite. This results in an increase of the activity for the n-hexane conversion, but accompanied only by a hydrogenolysis increase (aromatization levels only reached values around 10%). On the other hand, Trunschke et al. [23] pointed out that the interactions of the carbon phase with metal oxides during thermal treatments remove the acidity of the oxides, avoiding undesirable and parallel reactions (cracking). The carbon phase also favors dehydrogenation of alkanes to alkenes, which in turn leads to an increased yield of C8 aromatization into ethylbenzene (EB) and o-xylene (OX) [23]. Similar conclusions were obtained by Hoang et al. [24]. They prepared ZrO2/C composites (77.2% wt. ZrO2) pretreated at different temperatures (between 700 and 1600 °C) for both C6 and C8 aromatization. In this case, the carbon phase avoids the ZrO2 sintering and induces the destruction of acid sites during thermal pretreatments. The most selective catalyst is obtained after pretreatment at 1000 °C, providing a benzene selectivity of 67%.
Together with classical activated carbons, today there is available a large amount of advanced carbon materials (from 1D to 3D nanomaterials) with improved and fitted properties to be used in catalysis [15,17,18,25]. Among them, carbon gels (aerogels or xerogels) present additional advantages such as homogeneity and purity; moreover, its chemical and porous characteristics can be specifically designed and controlled during the sol-gel process, thus showing large possibilities in developing new catalysts [26]. Different aromatization catalysts containing several active phases such as metal oxides of Cr, Mo or W, or noble metals like Pt have been prepared by modifying their synthesis procedure [27,28,29]. In this manuscript, the advantage of using carbon materials in the design of new aromatization catalysts is briefly summarized. The results obtained in the n-hexane aromatization show that these easily prepared catalysts are a feasible alternative to metal-exchanged zeolitic materials, improving aspects such as stability or selectivity. Correlations between the variables of preparation (e.g., surfactants, drying, carbonization temperature), the morphology and active phases formed (non-stoichiometric oxides/carbides) and the catalytic performances are analyzed.

2. Results and Discussion

Today, one of the most deeply studied systems for the aromatization of n-hexane is the metal-exchanged ZSM5 zeolite. Tshabalala et al. [30] pointed out the higher activity and stability of acid HZSM5 regarding Ga, Mo or Zn-exchanged ZSM5, where mainly Ga/ZSM5 deactivated quickly. The highest aromatization selectivity was observed for Zn/ZSM5 (around 43%) while Mo/ZSM5 exhibits the lowest selectivity values (between 20 and 25%), even worse than those observed for acid forms. More recently, Huyen [31] et al. prepared Zn/ZSM-5 and B-Zn/ZSM5 catalysts. Zn/ZSM5 is more active and selective to benzene, but deactivated faster. The selectivity reached 52% at 500 °C, but also decreased with deactivation after 3 h on stream.
We have prepared different catalyst series. Figure 1 summarizes the performance of Mo and W-carbon xerogels (prepared following the methodology b in the Section 3) after direct carbonization at 500 °C. The higher activity of Mo catalysts compared to the W-ones is noteworthy, and it is also slightly more selective to benzene. Conversion increased more or less linearly in both cases with increasing temperature, but in this sense undesired cracking increased at the expense of aromatization.
The physicochemical properties of these samples are summarized in Table 1. Both carbon aerogels showed a similar pore size distribution, being samples with high macropore volumes and SBET around 500 m2 g−1, but without any appreciable mesoporosity. The difference between the samples is related to the chemical composition of their surfaces. In spite of the fact that both samples were prepared with a similar metal content in the starting solution, the total metal content detected by TG is higher in the case of the Mo sample (i.e., 1.9% and 1.4% wt. for Mo500 and W500, respectively). This implies a different M–C interaction, influencing processes such as lixiviation during the solvent exchange process. It is also noteworthy that the reduction of the Mo species during the carbonization even at 500 °C is favored, regarding the W-ones. Carbon evolved as COx and Mo (VI) reduced in a significant proportion to Mo (V). This deeper gasification during the carbonization process also increased the total metal content in this sample regarding the W500, where tungsten remains as W(VI). Moreover, the surface metal content detected by XPS of Mo-500 is also higher than for W500, indicating a best dispersion (smaller sintering) of the Mo phase.
Different nature and distributions of active sites are obtained depending on the experimental conditions used for the preparation of metal–carbon doped gels. By increasing the carbonization temperature up to 1000 °C, it forced the progressive reduction of the metal oxides. In this sense, a mixture of Mo (III) and Mo (V) in a ratio of 45/55 was observed for the sample Mo-1000 (results not shown) [27], however, although W remains mainly (93%) as W (VI), there is observed a certain carbidization (7% of WC). Comparing the results obtained with W-doped carbon aerogels carbonized at 500 °C and 1000 °C [27], it was pointed out that the total acidity determined by isopropanol decomposition is maintained, but strongly decreased the proportion of the propene/acetone formed in this reaction, which denotes a strong increase of basic centers regarding those acid ones with increasing carbonization temperature. This has led to a strong increase in the selectivity to benzene using W1000 regarding W500, which is enhanced from 17 to 38% at 550 °C. These results are in agreement with those previously published [23,24], in which the carbon phase determines the dispersion and acid character of metal oxides.
In spite of the large reduction of Mo phases, the carbidization of these non-stoichiometric oxides during carbonization is not observed. It was previously suggested that Mo-carbidization requires the presence of H2 and temperatures ranging 700 °C [32]. Nevertheless, because aromatization is carried out in the presence of H2, the formation of carbides along the reaction cannot be ruled out. In fact, Delporte et al. [33] observed the formation of carbide and oxycarbide species (MoCxOy) using MoO3 catalyst for the isomerization of n-hexane at 350 °C. They reported that the Mo phases formed are highly dependent of the H2/hexane ratio, determining the catalyst’s performance.
In our case, when the evolution of conversion and selectivity with the time on stream were analyzed, a very stable performance (Figure 2) of Mo-doped samples was observed, probably also indicating a negligible transformation of the catalyst’s surface. It is noteworthy that this stability is observed in spite of the same sample being used at different temperatures (Figure 1) for around 3h. MoOx are normally used as isomerization catalysts to obtain branched alkanes, however, it is observed that in our case the isomerization is negligible independent of the reaction temperature or time on stream. Cracking is the main process, favored by the acidity of the catalysts and the increasing reaction temperature.
Molybdenum carbide catalysts have attracted the attention of different research groups [34,35] as aromatization catalysts of light alkanes, being proposed as alternatives to noble metal (Pt) catalysts. The sol-gel procedure to obtain Mo-doped carbon gels was modified and samples were prepared following the methodology (c), in the Section 3. This implies that the first RF polymerization step is carried out in agitated batch reactors with the presence/absence of surfactants, thus defining the morphology of materials (fibers, spheres, etc. can be formed). Gels are partially cured in suspension before doping with the corresponding active phase. This procedure is faster than procedure (b), avoiding large cure periods inside the glass molds, but also avoids the formation of metal nanoparticles trapped inside the organic structure of the RF organic gels. After pre-gelation, nanoparticles are forced to be formed on the surface of previously gelled RF-structures. Additionally, surfactant molecules are incorporated into the RF chemical structure forming RFS composites that offer improved anchoring sites for metal adsorption during the impregnation process [29], allowing the obtaining of a high coverage on the carbon surface of metal nanoparticles (Figure 3) even after thermal carbonization at high temperature (900 °C).
The interaction of the RFS composites with the metal precursor is mainly determined by the nature of the surfactant. The stronger the RFS–Mo links, the deeper the reduction of the Mo phase will be observed during carbonization [28]. The XPS analysis of samples prepared by this procedure indicates that up to 60% of the Mo detected in surface is forming like β-Mo2C; this phase is also detected by XRD in some cases [36]. Thus, highly dispersed Mo nanoparticles can be easily formed and carburized when supported on nanostructured RFS gels following an easy “one pot” procedure, mainly when using a cationic surfactant that interacts attractively with the anionic RF macromolecule.
Figure 4 shows the catalytic performance of S7 catalysts, as an example, showing the typical evolution of this catalytic series. This sample is synthesized in the presence of cationic CTAB, TMB and t-butanol as co-surfactants, and after carbonization the ratio MoOx/MoCx = 42/58. As in the previous Mo series, conversion increased more or less linearly with temperature, isomerization is negligible and cracking is favored with increasing temperature. Due to the strong degree of reduction of the Mo-oxide phase, the smaller activity of S7 regarding Mo-500 is noteworthy, which showed a total n-hexane conversion at 580 °C. However, selectivity to benzene reached higher values (over 60% at 500 °C). In these experimental conditions (500 °C; Figure 4b), both conversion and selectivity slowly decreased with time on stream. Thus, less active but more selective phases are obtained by the progressive reduction of the Mo phase and the formation of Mo oxycarbides. Even when increasing temperature, the selectivity at 550 °C shows values at around 50%, increasing significantly from values ranging 25% for Mo-500 catalyst (Figure 1) at this temperature.
Pt catalysts [28] were prepared by classical incipient wetness impregnation using as support a mesoporous carbon aerogel previously synthesized (procedure a). After pretreatments in He flow at different temperatures, only metallic Pt0 species were detected. The catalytic performance is related therefore only with the dispersion of metallic nanoparticles. Figure 5 summarizes the performance of C900 2Pt catalyst, which contains a 2% of Pt (%wt.). The mean Pt particle size increased from 2.8 to 7.3 nm after pretreatment at 600 or 900 °C in He flow, respectively. At a glance, significant differences are observed regarding the previous series using oxide/oxycarbide catalysts such as: (i) Pt catalysts are active at significantly lower temperatures; (ii) in general, benzene is the main reaction product obtained; (iii) significant isomerization process takes place at low temperature; and (iv) at higher temperatures, conversion increases favoring aromatization regarding isomerization and cracking.
Small Pt nanoparticles obtained at low pretreatment temperature are highly active and n-hexane conversion increased from 35 to 90% in a short temperature range (between 400 and 465 °C); in this case, aromatization remains more or less constant and cracking increased at the expense of isomerization processes. With increases in the Pt particle size there is a strong reduction of the catalyst activity, but aromatization is strongly favored with increasing reaction temperature (reaching values of 78% at 500 °C), therefore decreasing in this sense both isomerization and cracking. These changes clearly point out the structure-sensitive character of aromatization on Pt-supported catalysts.
A similar effect was observed when increasing the Pt content from 2 to 5% (Table 2). Conversion decreased in spite of the higher Pt content, but benzene becomes the main product obtained, with a selectivity value of around 65%. Moreover, it is also noteworthy the high stability of Pt catalysts when supported on carbon aerogels (Figure 6). These results point out the importance of the carbon gel materials used to develop highly selective and stable catalysts for the aromatization of light alkanes (n-hexane). In general, the main aromatization product detected was benzene, while toluene was not detected. Cracking leads to the formation of the C1–C5 compounds and methylcyclopentane (MCP) was found as the main isomerization product. Conversion was calculated taking into account the amount of hexane transformed and selectivity as the amount of each detected product over the total hexane consumed. Thus, the values of cracking selectivity presented include the amounts of the C1–C5 compounds [27,28].

3. Materials and Methods

Carbon gel supports and the posterior functionalization with different active phases were synthesized following the method described by Pekala [37] with different modifications:
(a)
Preparation of carbon-gel supports (Figure 7): Resorcinol (R) and formaldehyde (F) in a molar ratio of R/F= ½ and Na2CO3, as polymerization catalyst (C) are dissolved in the appropriate amounts of distilled water (W). Solutions are cast into glass molds, sealed and cured for 1 day at room temperature, 2 days at 50 °C and 5 days at 80 °C. After that, gel rods are cut in pellets and introduced in acetone to remove the water inside the pores. Finally, gels were supercritically dried with carbon dioxide to obtain the corresponding organic RF aerogels or dried in the oven at 120 °C obtaining the corresponding xerogels. Pyrolysis of organic gels to obtain the derivative carbon gels is carried out in a tubular furnace under N2 flow by heating up to different temperatures (500 or 1000 °C) with a heating rate between 0.5 and 1.5 °C min−1.
After obtaining the corresponding carbon gels, supported catalysts were prepared by classical incipient wet impregnation with the corresponding metal salt precursors ([Pt (NH3)4]Cl2) and thermally pretreated in situ in inert (He) at temperatures 600–900 °C.
(a)
Metal-doped carbon gels were obtained directly by replacing Na2CO3 by the corresponding metal precursor in the starting solution [30,38]. In this case, ammonium molybdate or tungstate was used. The rest of the synthesis procedure was maintained as in procedure (a). In such a way, simultaneous carbonization of the RF organic fraction and decomposition of the precursor salts occurs during the same thermal process, leading directly to materials suitable to be used in catalysis.
(b)
Metal-supported carbon xerogels were obtained in powder following a procedure in two steps [29]; firstly, the polymerization of RF in the presence/absence of surfactants is carried out in a batch reactor at 50 °C for 2 h; after the morphology of the organic RF is defined, the solid in suspension is doped with metal precursors, then the temperature of the bath is increased up to 90 °C for an additional 24 h, allowing the complete polymerization of the organic fraction. Finally, solids are recovered by filtration, properly washed, dried in an oven and finally carbonized at 900 °C. The procedure is summarized in Figure 8.
Catalysts were properly texturally and chemically characterized using complementary techniques, including mercury porosimetry and gases adsorption (N2 at −196 °C and CO2 at 0 °C), XRD, SEM, HRTEM, XPS, TG, etc.
The aromatization of n-hexane experiments was carried out at atmospheric pressure using a quartz micro-reactor with 0.15 g catalyst forming a fixed bed. The reactor was fed with a continuous flow, 60 cm3 min−1, of a mixture 50%He/50%H2 bubbled in a hexane saturator cooled to fix the hexane concentration at 2.5% v/v. Products were analyzed by gas chromatography, using a flame ionization detector and a Chromosorb column. Conversion was defined on the basis of the n-hexane disappearance and selectivity as the fraction of hexane molecules transformed into each detected product.

4. Conclusions

The main drawback of aromatization catalysts is related to the loss of activity, selectivity and stability, mainly due to a fast deactivation by coke. Because these reactions are carried out in the absence of oxygen, guaranteeing the carbon stability, the use of carbon gel-based catalysts results in evident advantages based on a developed porous texture and basic character.
The sol-gel technology applied to the development of an aromatization catalyst presents a different alternative to optimize the performance of active phases, defining the nanostructure, nature and distribution of the corresponding active phases. Using non-noble active phases (Mo, W), the progressive reduction of the metal oxide phases takes place simultaneously to the carbonization of the organic phase. These processes minimize the acidity of the catalysts, increasing the aromatization selectivity. When these samples are synthesized in the presence of cationic surfactant (CTAB), new anchoring sites for metals are produced favoring a strong dispersion of the active phase and a deeper degree of reduction/carbidization. The formation of Mo2C again increases the aromatization selectivity (up to 60% in some cases) regarding samples where the active phase remains as metal oxide. In this catalyst series, the strength and distribution of acid sites determines the product distribution, increasing acidity and reaction temperature, favoring cracking processes.
Using noble metals (Pt) as active phase, the aromatization process takes place on the metallic surface (Pt0) and the reaction strongly depends on the Pt particle size. The C6 aromatization is a structure-sensitive reaction. Small nanoparticles are more active, but conversion increases with temperature, favoring cracking. With increasing Pt particle size, conversion decreased but the selectivity to benzene strongly increased, reaching values around 70%. In this case, conversion increased favoring aromatization processes, thus obtaining high conversion and aromatization selectivity values, both aspects being stable for a long time on streams.

Author Contributions

L.M.P.-M. and S.M.-T.; investigation, L.M.P.-M. and S.M.-T.; writing—original draft preparation, F.J.M.-H.; writing—review and editing, L.M.P.-M. and S.M.-T.; supervision, F.J.M.-H.; funding acquisition, L.M.P.-M., S.M.-T. and F.J.M.-H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Spanish Project ref. RTI 2018-099224-B100 funded by ERDF/Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities—State Research Agency and the Nano4Fresh project (ref. PCI2020-112045), as part of the PRIMA Programme supported by the European Union.

Acknowledgments

L.M.P.-M. (RYC-2016-19347) and S.M.-T. (RYC-2019-026634-I/AEI/10.13039/501100011033) acknowledge the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO), the State Research Agency and the European Social Found for their Ramón y Cajal research contracts. “Unidad de Excelencia Química Aplicada a Biomedicina y Medioambiente” of the University of Granada (UEQ-UGR) is gratefully acknowledged for the technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Derouane, E.G.; Vanderveken, D.J. Structural recognition and preorganization in zeolite catalysis: Direct aromatization of n-hexane on zeolite L-based catalysts. Appl. Catal. 1988, 45, L15–L22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guisnet, M.; Gnep, N.S.; Alario, F. Aromatization of short chain alkanes on zeolite catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1992, 89, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mahale, R.S.; Parikh, P.A. Aromatization of n-hexane: Synergism afforded by C1-C3 alcohols. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2020, 217, 115519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nezam, I.; Zhou, W.; Gusmão, G.S.; Realff, M.J.; Wang, Y.; Medford, A.J.; Jones, C.W. Direct aromatization of CO2 via combined CO2 hydrogenation and zeolite-based acid catalysis. J. CO2 Util. 2021, 45, 101405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, P.; Liu, J.; Cui, J.; Yang, Y.; Hu, C.-L.; Liu, B.-J. Preparation of Pt/CeL reforming catalyst and its performance in the aromatization of naphtha. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2019, 47, 318–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Besoukhanova, C.; Barthomeuf, D.; Breysse, M.; Bernard, J.R. Unusual Properties of Platinum Alkaline Zeolites in N-Hexane Dehydrocyclisation and Benzene Hydrogenation. In Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis; Seiyama, T., Tanabe, K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1981; Volume 7, pp. 1410–1411. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tauster, S.J.; Steger, J.J. Molecular die catalysis: Hexane aromatization over Pt/KL. J. Catal. 1990, 125, 387–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maldonado-Hódar, F.J.; Silva, J.M.; Ribeiro, F.R.; Ribeiro, M.F. Influence of the exchanged cation in coke deposition during n-hexane reactions on Pt/Mβ zeolite catalysts. Catal. Lett. 1997, 48, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bécue, T.; Maldonado-Hodar, F.J.; Antunes, A.P.; Silva, J.M.; Ribeiro, M.F.; Massiani, P.; Kermarec, M. Influence of Cesium in Pt/NaCsβ on the Physico-Chemical and Catalytic Properties of the Pt Clusters in the Aromatization of n-Hexane. J. Catal. 1999, 181, 244–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Maldonado, F.J.; Bécue, T.; Silva, J.M.; Ribeiro, M.F.; Massiani, P.; Kermarec, M. Influence of the Alkali in Pt/Alkali-β Zeolite on the Pt Characteristics and Catalytic Activity in the Transformation of n-Hexane. J. Catal. 2000, 195, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wongnongwa, Y.; Kidkhunthod, P.; Sukkha, U.; Pengpanich, S.; Thavornprasert, K.-A.; Phupanit, J.; Kungwan, N.; Feng, G.; Keawin, T.; Jungsuttiwong, S. Local structure elucidation and reaction mechanism of light naphtha aromatization over Ga embedded H-ZSM-5 zeolite: Combined DFT and experimental study. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020, 306, 110414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Uslamin, E.A.; Saito, H.; Sekine, Y.; Hensen, E.J.M.; Kosinov, N. Different mechanisms of ethane aromatization over Mo/ZSM-5 and Ga/ZSM-5 catalysts. Catal. Today 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fadaeerayeni, S.; Shan, J.; Sarnello, E.; Xu, H.; Wang, H.; Cheng, J.; Li, T.; Toghiani, H.; Xiang, Y. Nickel/gallium modified HZSM-5 for ethane aromatization: Influence of metal function on reactivity and stability. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2020, 601, 117629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, G.; Liu, J.; He, N.; Sheng, S.; Wang, G.; Guo, H. Pt supported on Zn modified silicalite-1 zeolite as a catalyst for n-hexane aromatization. J. Energy Chem. 2019, 34, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Su, D.S.; Perathoner, S.; Centi, G. Catalysis on nano-carbon materials: Going where to? Catal. Today 2012, 186, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vivo-Vilches, J.F.; Bailón-García, E.; Pérez-Cadenas, A.F.; Carrasco-Marín, F.; Maldonado-Hódar, F.J. Tailoring the surface chemistry and porosity of activated carbons: Evidence of reorganization and mobility of oxygenated surface groups. Carbon 2014, 68, 520–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Figueiredo, J.L. Nanostructured porous carbons for electrochemical energy conversion and storage. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 350, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Morales-Torres, S.; Maldonado-Hódar, F.J.; Pérez-Cadenas, A.F.; Carrasco-Marín, F. Design of low-temperature Pt-carbon combustion catalysts for VOC’s treatments. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Calvino-Casilda, V.; López-Peinado, A.J.; Durán-Valle, C.J.; Martín-Aranda, R.M. Last Decade of Research on Activated Carbons as Catalytic Support in Chemical Processes. Catal. Rev. 2010, 52, 325–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, G.; Zhang, X.; Bai, T.; Chen, T.; Fan, W. Coking kinetics and influence of reaction-regeneration on acidity, activity and deactivation of Zn/HZSM-5 catalyst during methanol aromatization. J. Energy Chem. 2015, 24, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rodríguez-Ramos, I.; Guerrero-Ruiz, A. Transformations of n-heptane over Pt/activated carbon catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1994, 119, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guerrero-Ruiz, A.; Bachiller-Baeza, B.; Rodríguez-Ramos, I. Catalytic properties of carbon-supported ruthenium catalysts for n-hexane conversion. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1998, 173, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Trunschke, A.; Hoang, D.L.; Radnik, J.; Brzezinka, K.W.; Brückner, A.; Lieske, H. Transition metal oxide/carbon composite catalysts for n-alkane aromatization: Structure and catalytic properties. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2001, 208, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hoang, D.L.; Preiss, H.; Parlitz, B.; Krumeich, F.; Lieske, H. Zirconia/carbon composites as monofunctional catalysts in C6+ alkane aromatization. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1999, 182, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Machado, B.F.; Serp, P. Graphene-based materials for catalysis. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 54–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Maldonado-Hódar, F.J. Advances in the development of nanostructured catalysts based on carbon gels. Catal. Today 2013, 218–219, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Maldonado-Hódar, F.J. Metal-doped carbon aerogels as catalysts for the aromatization of n-hexane. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2011, 408, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maldonado-Hódar, F.J. Platinum supported on carbon aerogels as catalysts for the n-hexane aromatization. Catal. Commun. 2012, 17, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maldonado-Hódar, F.J.; Jirglová, H.; Morales-Torres, S.; Pérez-Cadenas, A.F. Influence of surfactants on the physicochemical properties and catalytic behaviour of Mo-doped carbon xerogels. Catal. Today 2018, 301, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tshabalala, T.; Scurrell, M. Aromatization of n-hexane over Ga, Mo and Zn modified H-ZSM-5 zeolite catalysts. Catal. Commun. 2015, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huyen, P.T.; Trinh, V.D.; Teresa Portilla, M.; Martínez, C. Influence of boron promotion on the physico-chemical properties and catalytic behavior of Zn/ZSM-5 in the aromatization of n-hexane. Catal. Today 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pérez-Cadenas, A.F.; Maldonado-Hódar, F.J.; Moreno-Castilla, C. Molybdenum Carbide Formation in Molybdenum-Doped Organic and Carbon Aerogels. Langmuir 2005, 21, 10850–10855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Delporte, P.; Pham-Huu, C.; Ledoux, M.J. Effect of the reaction temperature and hydrocarbon partial pressure on the activity of carbon-modified MoO3 for n-hexane isomerization. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1997, 149, 151–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ledoux, M.J.; Huu, C.P.; Guille, J.; Dunlop, H. Compared activities of platinum and high specific surface area Mo2C and WC catalysts for reforming reactions: I. Catalyst activation and stabilization: Reaction of n-hexane. J. Catal. 1992, 134, 383–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rahman, M.; Sridhar, A.; Khatib, S.J. Impact of the presence of Mo carbide species prepared ex situ in Mo/HZSM-5 on the catalytic properties in methane aromatization. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2018, 558, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Morales-Torres, S.; Pastrana-Martínez, L.M.; Maldonado-Hódar, F.J. Influence of Electrostatic Interactions During the Resorcinol-Formaldehyde Polymerization on the Characteristics of Mo-Doped Carbon Gels. Processes 2020, 8, 746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pekala, R.W. U.S. Patent 4997804, 1991.
  38. Maldonado-Hódar, F.J.; Ferro-García, M.A.; Rivera-Utrilla, J.; Moreno-Castilla, C. Synthesis and textural characteristics of organic aerogels, transition-metal-containing organic aerogels and their carbonized derivatives. Carbon 1999, 37, 1199–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Carbon 07 00021 g001 550
Figure 1. Conversion and products distribution obtained with W (opened symbols) and Mo (closed symbols) prepared as doped carbon xerogels at 500 °C (adapted from ref. [27]).
Figure 1. Conversion and products distribution obtained with W (opened symbols) and Mo (closed symbols) prepared as doped carbon xerogels at 500 °C (adapted from ref. [27]).
Carbon 07 00021 g001
Carbon 07 00021 g002 550
Figure 2. Conversion and products distribution obtained with Mo500 carbon aerogel at 550 °C, as a function of time on stream.
Figure 2. Conversion and products distribution obtained with Mo500 carbon aerogel at 550 °C, as a function of time on stream.
Carbon 07 00021 g002
Carbon 07 00021 g003 550
Figure 3. Highly dispersed Mo nanoparticles on carbon xerogel S10 (RF + CTAB cationic surfactant + t-butanol) after carbonization at 900 °C.
Figure 3. Highly dispersed Mo nanoparticles on carbon xerogel S10 (RF + CTAB cationic surfactant + t-butanol) after carbonization at 900 °C.
Carbon 07 00021 g003
Carbon 07 00021 g004 550
Figure 4. Evolution of conversion and products distribution for sample S7: (a) as a function of temperature and (b) as a function of time on stream at 500 °C.
Figure 4. Evolution of conversion and products distribution for sample S7: (a) as a function of temperature and (b) as a function of time on stream at 500 °C.
Carbon 07 00021 g004
Carbon 07 00021 g005 550
Figure 5. Evolution of conversion and products distribution for sample C900 2Pt as a function of temperature after pretreatment in He at (a) 600 °C and (b) 900 °C.
Figure 5. Evolution of conversion and products distribution for sample C900 2Pt as a function of temperature after pretreatment in He at (a) 600 °C and (b) 900 °C.
Carbon 07 00021 g005
Carbon 07 00021 g006 550
Figure 6. Evolution of conversion and benzene selectivity as a function of time on stream at 475 °C, using C900 5Pt catalysts pretreated at 600 °C.
Figure 6. Evolution of conversion and benzene selectivity as a function of time on stream at 475 °C, using C900 5Pt catalysts pretreated at 600 °C.
Carbon 07 00021 g006
Carbon 07 00021 g007 550
Figure 7. Sequence followed for the preparation of carbon-gel supports.
Figure 7. Sequence followed for the preparation of carbon-gel supports.
Carbon 07 00021 g007
Carbon 07 00021 g008 550
Figure 8. Preparation of metal-doped carbon xerogel powder.
Figure 8. Preparation of metal-doped carbon xerogel powder.
Carbon 07 00021 g008
Table
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of metal-doped carbon catalysts.
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of metal-doped carbon catalysts.
SampleMetal
(%wt.)		XPS
M/C		Active
Species		SBET
(m2 g−1)		Vmacro
(cm3 g−1)		Vmeso
(cm3 g−1)
Mo5001.97.6Mo (V) 82%
Mo (VI) 18%		4811.400.00
W5001.41.4W (VI) 100%5281.320.05
SBET = apparent surface area; Vmacro = macropore volume; Vmeso = mesopore volume.
Table
Table 2. Influence of the Pt content on the catalytic performance of supported catalysts pretreated at 600 °C. Conversion and products distribution obtained at 475 °C.
Table 2. Influence of the Pt content on the catalytic performance of supported catalysts pretreated at 600 °C. Conversion and products distribution obtained at 475 °C.
Sampled PtCS CrackS IsoS AromYield Arom
(nm)(%)(%)(%)(%)(%)
C900 2Pt2.886.850.74.744.738.8
C900 5Pt9.960.532.72.464.939.3
d Pt = Pt particle size; C = Conversion; S Crack = Selectivity to cracking; S Iso = Selectivity to isomerization; S Arom = Selectivity to aromatization.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pastrana-Martínez, L.M.; Morales-Torres, S.; Maldonado-Hódar, F.J. A Comparative Study of Aromatization Catalysts: The Advantage of Hybrid Oxy/Carbides and Platinum-Catalysts Based on Carbon Gels. C 2021, 7, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/c7010021

AMA Style

Pastrana-Martínez LM, Morales-Torres S, Maldonado-Hódar FJ. A Comparative Study of Aromatization Catalysts: The Advantage of Hybrid Oxy/Carbides and Platinum-Catalysts Based on Carbon Gels. C. 2021; 7(1):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/c7010021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pastrana-Martínez, Luisa M., Sergio Morales-Torres, and Francisco J. Maldonado-Hódar. 2021. "A Comparative Study of Aromatization Catalysts: The Advantage of Hybrid Oxy/Carbides and Platinum-Catalysts Based on Carbon Gels" C 7, no. 1: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/c7010021

APA Style

Pastrana-Martínez, L. M., Morales-Torres, S., & Maldonado-Hódar, F. J. (2021). A Comparative Study of Aromatization Catalysts: The Advantage of Hybrid Oxy/Carbides and Platinum-Catalysts Based on Carbon Gels. C, 7(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/c7010021

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop