Abstract
This manuscript concerns two definite integrals that could be connected to the Bose-Einstein and the Fermi-Dirac functions in the integrands, separately, with numerators slightly modified with a difference in two expressions that contain the Fourier kernel multiplied by a polynomial and its complex conjugate. In this work, we use our contour integral method to derive these definite integrals, which are given by and in terms of the Lerch function. We use these two definite integrals to derive formulae by Erdéyli and Watson. We derive special cases of these integrals in terms of special functions not found in current literature. Special functions have the property of analytic continuation, which widens the range of computation of the variables involved.
1. Introduction
In 1953, Erdélyi et al. [1] and Watson et al. [2] published famous books containing a significant number of definite integrals not containing formal derivations. In this manuscript, we focus on deriving a few of these integrals, which have interesting closed forms, including deriving new Mellin transforms in terms of special functions. Mellin transforms [3] are used in solving the potential problem in a wedge-shaped region and solving linear differential equations in electrical engineering. We apply our method to derive these closed-form solutions, which are continued analytically along with some special cases. The derivations follow the method used by us in [4,5,6,7,8,9]. The generalized Cauchy’s integral formula is given by
This method involves using a form of Equation (1), then multipliying both sides by a function, then taking a definite integral of both sides. This yields a definite integral in terms of a contour integral. Then, we multiply both sides of Equation (1) by another function and take the infinite sum of both sides such that the contour integral of both equations are the same.
2. Definite Integral of the Contour Integrals
We use the method in [8]. The variable of integration in the contour integral is . The cut and contour are in the second quadrant of the complex z-plane. The cut approaches the origin from the interior of the second quadrant and the contour goes round the origin with zero radius and are on opposite sides of the cut.
2.1. The Hyperbolic Cotangent Contour Integral
Using a generalization of Cauchy’s integral formula, we form two equations by replacing y by and multiplying by to form the first equation, followed by replacing x by and multiplying by to obtain the second, subtracting the two followed by multiplying by , then taking the definite integral with respect to obtain
from Equation (2.4.11) in [10]. The condition on the left-hand side of Equation (2) is and the right-hand side of Equation (2) is . a and k are general complex numbers.
2.2. The Hyperbolic Cosecant Contour Integral
Using a generalization of Cauchy’s integral formula, we form two equations by replacing y by and multiplying by to form the first equation, followed by replacing x by and multiplying by to obtain the second. Subtracting the two followed by multiplying by , then taking the definite integral with respect , we obtain
from Equation (2.4.10) in [10].
3. The Lerch Function
The Lerch function given in (9.551) and (9.556) in [11] has a series representation given by
where and is continued analytically by its integral representation given by
where , or , or .
4. Infinite Sum of the Contour Integral
4.1. The Hyperbolic Cotangent Contour Integral
We then take the infinite sum over and simplify in terms of the Lerch function to obtain
from Equation (1.232.1) in [11] and .
Here, we derive the additional contour integral by using Equation (1) and replacing y with and multiplying both sides by to obtain
4.2. The Hyperbolic Cosecant Contour Integral
We then take the infinite sum over to obtain
from Equation (1.232.3) in [11] and .
5. Definite Integrals in Terms of the Lerch Function
Theorem 1.
For all and ,
Proof.
Theorem 2.
For all and ,
6. Table of Definite Integrals in and Special Cases
In this section, we derive formula in [11] and use Equations (12) and (13) with specific values of the parameters to derive definite integrals. Some of the definite integrals in this section can be viewed as either Mellin transforms or Laplace transforms.
6.1. Derivation of Entry (3.554.6)
Theorem 3.
For and ,
Proof.
The derivation of this particular integral is a bit involved and we detail the steps below. First, using Equation (12), we replace m by to form a second equation. Then, we take the difference between these two equations, setting and replacing with , k with , and using to obtain the Mellin transform
Next, we take the partial derivative of Equation (15) with respect to m and replace s with and simplify to obtain
Next, we multiply Equation (15) by i and add to Equation (16), setting and replacing m with and s with and simplifying to obtain
Replacing with in (20), we obtain
Subtracting Equation (20) from (21), we obtain
from Equation (25.11.3) [12]. Using Equation (13) and repeating the process from Equations (15) to (22) and simplifying, we obtain
□
6.2. Derivation of Entry (3.554.1)
Theorem 4.
For ,
Proof.
Using Equation (24) given by
and applying L’Hopital’s rule to the right-hand side as , then taking the definite integral over and simplifying, we obtain
where and . □
6.3. Derivation of Entry (3.554.4)
Theorem 5.
For ,
6.4. Derivation of Entry (3.554.2)
Theorem 6.
For ,
6.5. Derivation of Entry (3.554.5)
Theorem 7.
For ,
Proof.
Using Equation (20) and replacing with to form a second equation, we get
Next, we replace m by to obtain
Next, we replace x by , replace m with , and set ; simplifying, we obtain
Next, we set and apply L’Hopital’s rule to the right-hand side as and simplify to get
from Equation (13.21) in [2], where . This is equivalent to (3.554.5) in [11] by using the reflection formula and leads to a simpler formula. Note that the condition on q in [11] is in error even if q is real. □
6.6. Derivation of Entry (3.554.3)
Theorem 8.
For ,
Proof.
Next, we set , replace the variable m with to keep the equation consistent with [11], and apply L’Hopital’s rule as to obtain
where . This is equivalent to (3.554.3) in [11] by using the reflection formula and leads to a simpler formula. □
6.7. Special Cases Using Theorems
6.7.1. Example 1
Using (20) and setting and , we get
6.7.2. Example 2
Using (32) and setting and , we get
7. Definite Integrals in Terms of the Hypergeometric Function
In this section, we look at deriving definite integrals in terms of the hypergeometric function. These formula are not known in the current literature. Similar formula types are listed in [11]. The conditions for the hypergeometric function are given by Equation (15.2.1) in [12]. Since and its negative both appear in the hypergeometric function, to satisfy the conditions on , we must have be purely imaginary.
7.1. Example 1
Theorem 9.
For all and ,
Proof.
Use Equation (13) and replace m with to form a second equation, then take the difference of the two equations and set and simplify using Equations (8.359.1) and (9.559) in [11]. □
7.2. Example 2
Theorem 10.
For all and ,
Proof.
Use Equation (46) and take the first partial derivative with respect to m, then simplify using Equations (8.359.1) and (9.559) in [11]. □
7.3. Example 3
Theorem 11.
For all and ,
7.4. Example 4
Theorem 12.
For all and ,
Proof.
Use Equation (49) and take the first partial derivative with respect to m and simplify using Equations (8.359.1) in [11] and (6.6.8) in [13]. In this proof, we use the incomplete beta function given by Equation (8.39.1) in [11]. □
8. Definite Integral Involving Logarithmic and Sine Function and Quotient
In this section, we derive definite integrals in terms of the first partial derivative of the Lerch function with respect to the second parameter and the exponential function. The conditions for these functions are given in Sections (6.2) in [12] and (4.1) in [13].
8.1. Example 1
Theorem 13.
For all and ,
Proof.
Use Equation (12) and formulate a second equation by replacing m with . Next, take the difference from the first equation to create a third. Use the third equation and take the first partial derivative with respect to k and set and simplify using Equation (8.19.2) in [12], where . □
8.2. Example 2
Theorem 14.
For all and ,
Proof.
Use Equation (13) and form a second equation by replacing m with . Next, take the difference from the first equation, followed by taking the first partial derivative with respect to k and setting then simplify using Equation (8.19.2) in [12], where . □
9. Derivation of the Fourier Cosine Transform of Binet’s Integral
In this section, we derive the Fourier cosine transform of Binet’s integral. Binet’s integral is given by Equation (2.24) in [14].
Theorem 15.
For all and ,
Proof.
Theorem 16.
For all and ,
Proof.
Use Equation (53), take the first partial derivative with respect to k, then set , replace a with , and simplify in terms of the arctangent function. □
Example of a Special Case in Terms of the Sine Integral Function,
Using Equation (53), setting , and simplifying, we obtain
10. Discussion
In this work, we used our method to derive new and known definite integrals. We derived updated forms of a few of these previously published results. We also derived new Mellin transforms for the product of the exponential function and trigonometric functions. The implications of our work are that these new formulae may be added to existing published tables such as [1,15]. We will continue to use our method to add to other published tables.
11. Conclusions
In this manuscript, we evaluated a few definite integrals in [11]. We used analytic continuation where possible, resulting in a wider range of computation. The findings in this work were numerically evaluated for both real and imaginary values using Mathematica by Wolfram.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, R.R.; methodology, R.R.; writing—original draft preparation, R.R.; writing—review and editing, R.R. and A.S.; funding acquisition, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research is supported by NSERC Canada under grant 504070.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Erdéyli, A.; Magnus, W.; Oberhettinger, F.; Tricomi, F.G. Higher Transcendental Functions; McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.: New York, NY, USA; Toronto, ON, Canada; London, UK, 1953; Volume I. [Google Scholar]
- Whittaker, E.T.; Watson, G.N. A Course in Modern Analysis, 4th ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990; pp. 268–269. [Google Scholar]
- Bertrand, J.; Bertrand, P.; Ovarlez, J.-P. The Mellin Transform. The Transformsand Applications Handbook: Second Edition; CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Reynolds, R.; Stauffer, A. Definite Integral of Arctangent and Polylogarithmic Functions Expressed as a Series. Mathematics 2019, 7, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Reynolds, R.; Stauffer, A. A Definite Integral Involving the Logarithmic Function in Terms of the Lerch Function. Mathematics 2019, 7, 1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Reynolds, R.; Stauffer, A. Derivation of Logarithmic and Logarithmic Hyperbolic Tangent Integrals Expressed in Terms of Special Functions. Mathematics 2020, 8, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Reynolds, R.; Stauffer, A. Definite integrals involving product of logarithmic functions and logarithm of square root functions expressed in terms of special functions. AIMS Math. 2020, 5, 5724–5733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Reynolds, R.; Stauffer, A. A Method for Evaluating Definite Integrals in Terms of Special Functions with Examples. Int. Math. Forum 2020, 15, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Reynolds, R.; Stauffer, A. Integrals in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik: Hyperbolic and algebraic functions. Int. Math. Forum 2020, 15, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Erdéyli, A.; Magnus, W.; Oberhettinger, F.; Tricomi, F.G. Tables of Integral Transforms; McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.: New York, NY, USA; Toronto, ON, Canada; London, UK, 1954; Volume I. [Google Scholar]
- Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Tables of Integrals, Series and Products, 6th ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Olver, F.W.J.; Daalhuis, A.B.O.; Lozier, D.W.; Schneider, B.I.; Boisvert, R.F.; Clark, C.W.; Miller, B.R.; Saunders, B.V.; Cohl, H.S.; McClain, M.A. NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions. Release 1.1.0 of 15 December 2020. Available online: http://dlmf.nist.gov/ (accessed on 12 January 2021).
- Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I.A. (Eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, 9th ed.; Dover: New York, NY, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Van der Laan, C.G.; Temme, N.M. Calculation of Special Functions: The Gamma Function, the Exponential Integrals and Error-Like Functions; Mathematisch Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984; ISBN 90-6196-277-3. [Google Scholar]
- Brychkov, Y.A.; Marichev, O.I.; Savischenko, N.V. Handbook of Mellin Transforms; CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).