Abstract
In this paper, we introduce and establish the concept of a central test set for free nilpotent Lie algebras. We prove that the central test rank of a free nilpotent Lie algebra Lc,2 of rank 2 and nilpotency class c = 3 equals 3. Furthermore, we show that a minimal central test set of L3,2 belongs to the lower-degree bracket structures and is explicitly given by the set = {[x,y], [[x,y],x], [x,y],y}. We also analyze higher nilpotency classes c ≥ 4 and delineate the degree conditions under which elements effectively eliminate non-central derivations.
MSC:
17B01; 17B30; 17B40; 20F40
1. Introduction
The study of automorphisms and structural invariants in Lie algebras plays a foundational role in understanding their representation theory, algorithmic properties, and symmetry structures [1,2]. Originating in the classical work of Nielsen [3], the. paradigm of recognizing global algebraic mappings through specific invariant elements has been extensively investigated across combinatorial algebra, group theory, and non-commutative cryptography [4]. Among various automorphism subgroups, central automorphisms—those that act trivially on the quotient of an algebra by its center—form a vital normal subgroup of the full automorphism group [5]. Characterizing whether a given mapping constitutes a general automorphism or belongs to a central subgroup remains an essential problem in combinatorial Lie theory [5].
A powerful paradigm developed to address these questions is the theory of test elements [6]. Introduced for free groups and algebras by Shpilrain [6], a test element t is an element whose invariance under an endomorphism φ (i.e., φ(t) = t) forces φ to be an automorphism. Early fundamental results established that commutators serve as primary test elements in two-generator free structures, as demonstrated by Dicks [7] and extended to primitive elements in metabelian algebras by Drensky and Yu [8]. Further extensions were developed by Mikhalev and Zolotykh [9] as well as Mikhalev and Yu [10] for free Lie algebras and superalgebras, examining test elements alongside the. invertibility of non-commutative Jacobian matrices [11,12].
While individual test elements suffice to recognize general automorphisms in free Lie algebras [10,9,6], they fail to capture sufficient algebraic information to resolve the full automorphism group in restricted quotient structures. To overcome this limitation, attention shifted toward test sets—collections of elements whose joint invariance ensures automorphism status—and the associated notion of test rank [13]. Esmerligil and Ekici [13] systematically investigated these properties in free metabelian Lie algebras, showing that the test rank equals n-1 with minimal test sets residing in the derived subalgebra. Subsequently, Temizyürek and Ekici [14] identified particular test elements in free solvable Lie algebras of rank two, and Eskal and Ekici [15] analyzed test elements on direct sums and free products of free Lie algebras. Related endomorphism and derivation properties in relatively free Lie structures have also been explored by Umirbaev [16], Timoshenko and Shevelin [17], Erginkara and Fındık [18] and Umirbaev [19], noting that different formulations of central automorphisms appear depending on whether action modulo the center or higher derived series is considered [18].
In nilpotent environments, the lower central series and the presence of a non-trivial center introduce unique structural obstacles [5]. As the nilpotency class c increases, the algebraic dimension of the center grows rapidly in accordance with Witt’s formula, whereas the rank of standard Lie-Jacobian derivation matrices [11,12] remains bounded by the number of free generators [5]. This dimensional mismatch leads to the phenomenon of “Jacobian blindness,” where central shifts and drifts project into the kernel undetected by standard derivation matrices [5,11,12].
To address these limitations, Öztekin and Ekici [5] systematically examined the properties of central automorphisms in free nilpotent Lie algebras. Building upon these foundations, this paper introduces the concept of a central test set—a collection of elements whose joint invariance under an endomorphism uniquely forces it to be a central automorphism [5]. Focusing on the free nilpotent Lie algebra L3,2 of rank 2 and nilpotency class c = 3, we analyze the constraint matrices governing central endomorphisms and prove that the central test rank is strictly equal to 3. Furthermore, we provide an explicit construction of the minimal central test set given by
that completely resolves this Jacobian blindness for class 3.
= {[x,y], [[x,y],x], [x,y],y}
2. Notations and Preliminaries
Throughout this paper, K denotes a field of characteristic zero and L = L(x,y) denotes the free Lie algebra generated by the set X = {x,y} over K. The product operation in L is denoted by the Lie bracket [∙,∙] which satisfies the standard axioms of anticommutativity and the Jacobi identity.
The lower central series of L is defined inductively by:
A Lie algebra G is called nilpotent of class c if γc+1(G) = {0} and γc(G) ≠ {0}. The free nilpotent Lie algebra of rank 2 and nilpotency class c denoted by Lc,2 is defined as the quotient algebra:
Let Π:L → Lc,2 be the natural projection mapping. For brevity, we denote the images of the free generators Π(x) and Π(y) simply as x and y within Lc,2. The algebra Lc,2 inherits a natural graded structure from the free Lie algebra
where represents the k-th homogeneous component. The center of Lc,2 denoted by Z(Lc,2) corresponds precisely to the supreme graded component of this series, namely:
An endomorphism φ of Lc,2 is uniquely determined by its action on the free generators:
where and
γ1(L) = L, γk+1(L) = [γk(L),L] for k ≥ 1
Z(Lc,2) = L(c)
φ(x) = α1x + β1y + u1, φ(y) = α2x + β2y + u2
Furthermore, φ is an automorphism if and only if the linear component matrix (the Jacobian matrix) modulo γ2(Lc,2) is invertible:
Definition 1.
An automorphism φ ∈ Aut(Lc,2) is called a central automorphism if it acts as the identity mapping modulo the center of the algebra. That is,
for all v ∈ L2,c. Consequently, φ is central if and only if the shift elements u1 and u2 satisfy u1, u2 ∈ Z(L2,c) = L(c) and the linear part matrix Mφ is the identity matrix I2.
φ(v) ≡ v(modZ(L2,c))
Definition 2.
A subset = {𝓉1, 𝓉2,…,𝓉m} is called a central test set if for any endomorphism φ of L2,c, the condition φ(𝓉j) = 𝓉j for all 1 ≤ j ≤ m implies that φ is a central automorphism. The central test rank of L2,c is the minimal cardinality among all central test sets of L2,c.
3. Main Results and Theorems
In this section, we establish the main results of the paper. We begin by proving that any candidate central test set of cardinality m < 3 is insufficient, thereby establishing the lower bound.
Theorem 1
(Lower Bound on Central Test Cardinality). Let L3,2 be a free nilpotent Lie algebra of rank 2 and nilpotency class c = 3. The central test rank of L3,2 required to uniquely characterize central automorphisms is at least 3.
Proof of Theorem 1.
Let T = {u1 … um} be a subset of L3,2 with m < 3. Any endomorphism φ is defined by its action on the generators x,y:
where and w1, w2 ∈ γ2(Lc,2). The linear part of φ is represented by the matrix .
φ(x) = α1x + β1y + w1, φ(y) = α2x + β2y + w2
For φ to fix an element u ∈ L(k) (where k ≥ 2), φ(u) − u must vanish. The action φ on L(2) = spanK{[x,y]} yields:
Thus, fixing [x,y] imposes the constraint .
Now consider the homogeneous components L(3) = spanK{[[x,y],x],[[x,y],y]}, which has dimension d3 = 2. The action of φ on L(3) modulo modγ4(Lc,2) is governed by the matrix product of det(Mφ) and Mφ:
If m = 2, say T = {u1,u2} the requirement φ(ui) = ui (i = 1,2) induces a linear system on the parameters . Since Mφ ∈ GL2(K) has four entries subject to det(Mφ) = 1 (leaving three degrees of freedom), two test conditions impose at most two independent constraints. Consequently, the linear system for the non-central components has a non-trivial solution space containing matrices Mφ ≠ I2.
φ([[x,y],x]) ≡ α1[[x,y],x] + β1[[x,y],y] (modγ4(Lc,2))
φ([[x,y],y]) ≡ α2[[x,y],x] + β2[[x,y],y] (modγ4(Lc,2))
Explicitly, setting T′ = {[x,y],[[x,y],x]}, we can define an endomorphism φ by φ(x) = x and φ(y) = y + [x,y]. Then φ([x,y]) = [φ(x),φ(y)] = [x,y + [x,y]] = [x,y] + +[x,[x,y]] ≠ [x,y]. Alternatively, choosing linear combinations shows that m = 2 elements leave an undetermined component in L(1). Thus, m ≥ 3 is necessary. □
Theorem 2
(Explicit Minimal Central Test Set). The lower bound established in Theorem 1 is sharp. For the free nilpotent Lie algebra L3,2 of rank 2 and nilpotency class c = 3, the set:
is a minimal central test set of cardinality exactly 3 that uniquely characterizes central automorphisms in L3,2. Thus, the central test rank of L3,2 is exactly 3.
= {[x,y], [[x,y],x], [x,y],y}
Proof of Theorem 2.
Let φ ∈ End(Lc,2) such that:
- φ([x,y]) = [x,y]
- φ([[x,y],x]) = [[x,y],x]
- φ([[x,y],y]) = [[x,y],y]
The action of the endomorphism φ on the generators x and y can be expressed in general form as:
where and The goal is to establish that α1 = 1, α2 = 0, β1 = 0, β2 = 1 and u1, u2 ∈ Z(L3,2).
φ(x) = α1x + β1y + u1, φ(y) = α2x + β2y + u2
- Step 1: Determination of the linear part
Applying the endomorphism φ to [x,y] yields:
By projecting this equality onto the homogeneous component of degree 2, we obtain
Since φ([x,y]) = [x,y], comparing degree 2 terms implies that the determinant of the linear transformation matrix is 1:
Next, we apply φ to the degree 3 elements in :
Comparing the degree 3 components on both sides gives:
By the linear independence of the basic commutators of degree 3, we deduce α1 = 1, and β1 = 0. Analogously, evaluating φ([[x,y],y]) yields α2 = 0 and β2 = 1.
φ([x,y]) = [φ(x),φ(y)] = [α1x + β1y + u1,α2x + β2y + u2]
φ([[x,y],x]) = [φ([x,y]),φ(x)] = [[x,y],α1x + β1y + u1]
α1[[x,y],x] + β1[[x,y],y] = 1∙[[x,y],x] + 0∙[[x,y],y]
Hence, the linear part of φ is the identity matrix (which automatically implies φ is surjective and thus an automorphism), reducing the action to:
φ(x) = x + u1, φ(y) = y + u2
- Step 2: Elimination of Non-central Degree 2 Shifts
Decompose u1 and u2 into their homogeneous degree components:
Since L(2) is one-dimensional and spanned by [x,y], let and for k1, k2 ∈ K. The degree 3 projection of φ([x,y]) gives:
Since φ([x,y]) has no component of degree 3, we must have. −k2[[x,y],x] + k1[[x,y],y] = 0, which forces k1 = 0 and k2 = 0. Thus and .
Consequently, and u2 = . Therefore, φ(x) ≅ x(modZ(L3,2)) and φ(y) ≅ y(modZ(L3,2)) proving that any endomorphism fixing pointwise is necessarily an automorphism and specifically a central automorphism. □
Remark 1
(The Degenerate Case c = 2). For a free nilpotent Lie algebra Lc,2 of rank 2, the case c = 2 is degenerate as the notion of a central test set fails to exist. When c = 2, the center coincides entirely with the derived subalgebra, i.e.,
Consequently, higher-degree bracket structures such as [[x,y],x] and [[x,y],y] vanish identically to zero. Furthermore, any central shift u1, u2 ∈ Z(L2,2) trivially commutes with all elements. This implies that testing elements within L(2) fails to isolate central automorphisms from general non-central endomorphisms.
Z(L2,2) = L(2) = spanK{[x,y]}
To illustrate this breakdown, consider the following concrete counterexample in L2,2:
Example 1
(Counterexample for c = 2). Let L2,2 = spanK{x, y, [x,y]} be the. three-dimensional Heisenberg Lie algebra. Consider the non-central endomorphism φ defined on the generators by:
Notice that φ is clearly not a central automorphism, as φ(x) = 2x ≇ x(modZ(L2,2). However, evaluating φ on the candidate test element 𝓉 = [x,y] ∈ L(2) yields:
since φ([x,y]) = [x,y], the non-central endomorphism φ passes the invariance condition under [x,y]. Because no higher-degree non-zero elements exist in L2,2 to impose additional constraints, no subset of L2,2 can serve as a central test set.
Remark 2
(Higher Nilpotency Classes c ≥ 4). For nilpotency classes c ≥ 4, test sets constructed exclusively from degree 2 and degree 3 elements (such as ) are insufficient to guarantee central automorphism status. As demonstrated by the derivation D(a) = [[x,y],a], the mapping φ = exp(D) = Id + D defines an automorphism under which all elements of remain invariant because D([x,y]) = 0 and higher bracket applications vanish modulo γc+1(Lc,2). However, φ(x) − x = [[x,y],x] has degree 3, whereas the center Z(Lc,2) = L(c) resides at degree c ≥ 4. Thus φ is non-central. To form a complete central test set for general c ≥ 4 higher-degree bracket structures, up to Lc−1 must be included, resulting in central test ranks strictly exceeding 3.
4. Classification and Interdisciplinary Discussion
4.1. Comparison Across Lie Algebra Classes
To contextualize our main result, Table 1 summarizes the test ranks and central test rank across fundamental classes of free and nilpotent Lie algebras.
Table 1.
Test ranks and central test ranks of free nilpotent Lie algebras of rank 2.
4.2. Interdisciplinary Applications
While our results are combinatorial and algebraic, structural invariants of Lie algebras provide algebraic foundations for operator theory. In quantum field theory and Fock space calculus, creation and annihilation operators satisfy canonical commutation relations that form nilpotent Lie algebraic structures. Minimal central test sets guarantee that field transformations preserve canonical bracket structures and energy state symmetries without collapsing into deeper central ideals.
5. Conclusions and Future Outlook
In this paper, we introduced and established the concept of a central test set for the free nilpotent Lie algebra L3,2. We proved that the central test rank of L3,2 is strictly equal to 3 and explicitly identified the minimal central test set
Future research directions include:
= {[x,y], [[x,y],x], [x,y],y}
Extending the determination of central test ranks to free nilpotent Lie algebras of rank n > 2.
Analyzing the algorithmic implementations and matrix representations of automorphism group actions on second cohomology Grassmannians and invariant spaces.
Investigating analogous notions in Lie superalgebras and quantum group structures.
Funding
This research was funded by Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (BAP) of Gaziantep University (Project No. BNG.25.01).
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
References
- de Graaf, W.A. Lie Algebras: Theory and Algorithms; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Reutenauer, C.A. Free Lie Algebras; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen, J. Die Isomorphismen der allgemeinen unendlichen gruppe mit zwei erzeugenden. Math. Ann. 1918, 78, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Myasnikov, A.G.; Shpilrain, V.; Ushakov, A. Non-Commutative Cryptography and Complexity of Group-Theoretic Problems; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Öztekin, Ö.; Ekici, N. Central automorphisms of free nilpotent Lie algebras. J. Algebra Its Appl. 2017, 16, 1750205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shpilrain, V. Test elements for endomorphisms of free groups and algebras. Isr. J. Math. 1995, 92, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dicks, W. A commutator test for two elements to generate the free algebra of rank two. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 1982, 14, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Drensky, V.; Yu, J.T. Primitive elements of free metabelian algebras of rank two. Int. J. Algebra Comput. 2003, 13, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mikhalev, A.A.; Zolotykh, A.A. Test elelments for monomorphisms of free Lie algebras and Lie superalgebras. Commun. Algebra 1995, 23, 4995–5001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mikhalev, A.A.; Yu, J.T. Test elements and retracts of free Lie algebras. Commun. Algebra 1997, 25, 3283–3289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Reutenauer, C.A. Applications of a noncommutative Jacobian matrix. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 1992, 77, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Umirbaev, U.U. On Jacobian matrices of Lie algebras. In Proceedings of the 6 All-Union Conference on Varieties of Algebraic Systems; Magnitogorsk State Pedagogical Institute: Magnitogorsk, USSR, 1990; pp. 32–33. [Google Scholar]
- Esmerligil, Z.; Ekici, N. Test sets and test rank of free metabelian Lie algebra. Commun. Algebra 2003, 31, 5581–5589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Temizyürek; A. Ekici, N. A particular test element of a free solvable Lie algebra of rank two. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 2007, 37, 1315–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Eskal, C.; Ekici, N. Test elements of direct sum and free products of free Lie algebras. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) 2016, 126, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Umirbaev, U.U. Partial derivatives and endomorphisms of some relatively free Lie algebras. Sib. Math. J. 1993, 34, 1161–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Timoshenko, E.I.; Shevelin, M.A. Computing the test rank of a free solvable Lie algebra. Sib. Math. J. 2008, 49, 1131–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Erginkara, Ö.; Fındık, Ş. On central automorphisms of free metabelian Lie algebras. J. Univ. Math. 2022, 5, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Umirbaev, U.U. Automorphisms of free metabelian Lie algebras. J. Algebra 2026, 698, 433–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.