Next Article in Journal
Correction: Camazón Portela, D.; López Ramos, J.A. Error-Correcting Codes on Projective Bundles over Deligne–Lusztig Varieties. Mathematics 2023, 11, 3079
Previous Article in Journal
Information Fusion and Decision-Making Utilizing Additional Permutation Information
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multidimensional Inequality Metrics for Sustainable Business Development

by
Daniel Felix Ahelegbey
1,* and
Paolo Giudici
2
1
School of Mathematics, Statistics, and Actuarial Science, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, UK
2
Department of Economics and Management, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2024, 12(22), 3633; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12223633
Submission received: 29 October 2024 / Revised: 16 November 2024 / Accepted: 17 November 2024 / Published: 20 November 2024

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel methodology for measuring and decomposing multidimensional inequality, allowing for the breakdown of overall inequality into contributions from distinct dimensions. This approach offers valuable insights for sustainable business development by identifying economic sectors where Environmental, Social, or Governance (ESG) practices are most unequal and thus may benefit from policy intervention. Additionally, it explores the relationship between company size and sustainability, highlighting that the most concentrated sectors tend to exhibit the greatest ESG inequality. Applying this methodology to a sample of over 1000 small and medium-sized enterprises across various sectors in Italy, our analysis of the multidimensional index for 2022 reveals notable disparities in corporate financial performance and ESG adoption. Specifically, the manufacturing sector exhibited the highest inequality in financial performance, with an index of 0.77, indicating significant variation in financial health and firm size. Conversely, the financial services sector showed lower financial inequality, with an index of 0.23, suggesting more uniform outcomes. On the ESG front, the financial sector demonstrated the highest inequality, particularly in environmental and social dimensions, with an average Gini coefficient of 0.26, while the manufacturing sector displayed a more consistent ESG performance, with an average Gini of 0.19. These findings underscore sector-specific patterns in financial and ESG dimensions, providing a foundation for targeted interventions to reduce disparities.
Keywords: inequality measurement; multidimensional inequality; market inequality; ESG; decomposition analysis; sustainable growth inequality measurement; multidimensional inequality; market inequality; ESG; decomposition analysis; sustainable growth

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahelegbey, D.F.; Giudici, P. Multidimensional Inequality Metrics for Sustainable Business Development. Mathematics 2024, 12, 3633. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12223633

AMA Style

Ahelegbey DF, Giudici P. Multidimensional Inequality Metrics for Sustainable Business Development. Mathematics. 2024; 12(22):3633. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12223633

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahelegbey, Daniel Felix, and Paolo Giudici. 2024. "Multidimensional Inequality Metrics for Sustainable Business Development" Mathematics 12, no. 22: 3633. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12223633

APA Style

Ahelegbey, D. F., & Giudici, P. (2024). Multidimensional Inequality Metrics for Sustainable Business Development. Mathematics, 12(22), 3633. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12223633

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop