Review Reports
by
- Ann-Christin Sollerhed
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Oliver Ramos-Álvarez
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsPlease see the attachment.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe topic proposed by the authors is of great interest in order to offer quality education in the motor field.
The introduction is in line with the contextualization of physical activity; however, there are citations that should be updated. A little more than 15% of the total references in the document belong to the last five years. Only 8 of the 51 references, with 15.68%, belong to the last 5 years. This aspect can be extended to the discussion of the paper.
The section on materials and methods should be divided into other subsections and the research procedure should be better broken down.
In reference to the sample, there is a large difference between men and women, which could lead to a bias in the research. In addition, no information is collected from other agents involved in the motor education of students at these ages, such as caregivers or professionals who can direct the leisure time of the sample towards motor tasks. This can also produce a bias in the research.
Although the use of a qualitative research methodology is accepted as a valid method for the production of scientific evidence, it seems insufficient in this research. It would have been desirable that the research had been complemented with the use of quantitative methods. The authors also do not indicate how the interview with open-ended questions was validated.
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageMinor editing of English language required
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsCongratulations to the authors.
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsDear Authors,
First of all I would like to thank you for the effort to collect the constructive comments I provided. I believe that the content of your work is now clearer.
I congratulate you for addressing such an important topic. Best regards.
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageMinor editing of English language required