Next Article in Journal
Influence of Group-IVA Doping on Electronic and Optical Properties of ZnS Monolayer: A First-Principles Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Porosity Engineering towards Nitrogen-Rich Carbon Host Enables Ultrahigh Capacity Sulfur Cathode for Room Temperature Potassium–Sulfur Batteries
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Cobalt–Nickel Aluminate Spinels Using the Laser-Induced Thermionic Vacuum Arc Method and Thermal Annealing Processes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of Sugarcane Bagasse-Derived Activated Carbon via a High-Energy Ball Milling Treatment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Vanadium Oxide-Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) Nanocomposite as High-Performance Cathode for Aqueous Zn-Ion Batteries: The Structural and Electrochemical Characterization

by
Filipp S. Volkov
1,
Svetlana N. Eliseeva
1,
Mikhail A. Kamenskii
1,
Alexey I. Volkov
1,
Elena G. Tolstopjatova
1,
Oleg V. Glumov
1,
Lijun Fu
2 and
Veniamin V. Kondratiev
1,*
1
Institute of Chemistry, Saint Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Nab, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia
2
State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(21), 3896; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213896
Submission received: 27 September 2022 / Revised: 1 November 2022 / Accepted: 2 November 2022 / Published: 4 November 2022

Abstract

:
In this work the nanocomposite of vanadium oxide with conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (VO@PEDOT) was obtained by microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis. The detailed study of its structural and electrochemical properties as cathode of aqueous zinc-ion battery was performed by scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray analysis, X-ray diffraction analysis, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge–discharge, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The initial VO@PEDOT composite has layered nanosheets structure with thickness of about 30–80 nm, which are assembled into wavy agglomerated thicker layers of up to 0.3–0.6 μm. The phase composition of the samples was determined by XRD analysis which confirmed lamellar structure of vanadium oxide V10O24∙12H2O with interlayer distance of about 13.6 Å. The VO@PEDOT composite demonstrates excellent electrochemical performance, reaching specific capacities of up to 390 mA∙h∙g−1 at 0.3 A∙g−1. Moreover, the electrodes retain specific capacity of 100 mA∙h∙g−1 at a high current density of 20 A∙g−1. The phase transformations of VO@PEDOT electrodes during the cycling were studied at different degrees of charge/discharge by using ex situ XRD measurements. The results of ex situ XRD allow us to conclude that the reversible zinc ion intercalation occurs in stable zinc pyrovanadate structures formed during discharge.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The growing demand for electrochemical power sources in modern technologies defines the development of stable and safe electrochemical devices. Nowadays, lithium-ion batteries are still the most widely used electrochemical source of energy, owing to their high energy density [1,2]. However, their drawbacks, including safety issues and decreasing availability and high price of lithium, dictate the need for the development of alternative metal-ion rechargeable batteries. Among multiple different types of batteries, aqueous zinc-ion batteries (AZIBs) have attracted increasing attention due to their high safety, environmental friendliness, low cost, and high gravimetric and volumetric capacities of metal zinc anode (820 mA∙h∙g−1 and 5855 mA∙h∙cm−3) [3,4].
Overcoming low cycling stability and rate capability of cathode materials for AZIBs is a major challenge in their successful implementation [3,5,6]. In the past decade since the first reports on AZIBs with mild electrolytes [7,8] employing MnO2 cathodes, many other types of cathode materials were proposed [9,10] including vanadium oxides [11,12], Prussian blue analogues [13], transitional metal disulfides [14], and organic compounds [15,16].
Of these, vanadium pentoxide V2O5 has the theoretical capacity value of up to 589 mA∙h∙g−1 per two-electron process [17], while most reported experimental results are ca. 300 mA∙h∙g−1 [9,18]. Further, layered-type structure of these materials allows high reversibility of ion intercalation [19]. Nevertheless, one of the major problems affecting the performance of vanadium oxide-based cathode materials is their dissolution [11,18], which leads to unsatisfactory performance, especially at lower current densities. In addition, highly crystalline vanadium oxide-based materials require activation of the material [20,21], which hinders the performance in the initial cycles.
Several strategies exist to overcome these drawbacks. These include nanostructuring [22], addition of conducting polymers [20,23] or carbons [24,25] as components or coatings, and inclusion of different metal ions into the crystal structure of the material via pre-intercalation [25,26] or manufacturing of pillared structures, i.e., the solids with the interlayer distance permanently expanded by inserting a strongly bound guest ion or molecule [9,27,28,29].
First, synthesis conditions affect the crystal lattice and regulate the amount of crystallized water in the molecule. Water molecules inserted into the crystal lattice can “lubricate” intercalation by regulating the interlayer distance [30,31] and can then be replaced by zinc ions during cycling [32]. It has been established that the presence of water in, e.g., V2O5·nH2O [33], NaCa0.6V6O16·3H2O [34], ZnMn2O4·0.94H2O [35], decreases the interaction energy of zinc ions with the crystal lattice, thus promoting the intercalation processes. Further, during recharging, co-intercalation of Zn2+ and water molecules facilitates the zinc ions diffusion [36].
The use of conductive additives, markedly conducting polymers along with traditional carbon additives, can significantly increase the electronic and ionic conductivity of composite materials and improve the diffusion of zinc ions inside the crystal lattice. These benefits arise from the formation of highly porous structures and reducing the coulombic interactions between zinc ions and lattice oxygen anions, via optimized local charge distribution in the crystal lattice [37]. Furthermore, chains or blocks of conducting polymer can be inserted into the crystal lattice and act as “pillars” enlarging the interlayer spacing and greatly enhancing its structural stability. This effect of interfacial engineering was described for V2O5 composites with polyaniline [38] and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) PEDOT [39]. The application of an aniline-based polymer 3-phenylpropylamine led to enlarging of the interlayer distance to 18 Å [40]. The use of PEDOT also enhances the electrochemical properties of vanadium oxide- [41,42] and ammonium vanadate-based [43] electrode materials. The incorporation of PEDOT via in situ chemical approach with partial reduction of V2O5 in the presence of EDOT monomer may enhance the electrochemical performance by transformation of the initial structure into mixed-valence V10O24∙12H2O in the resulting vanadium oxide/conducting polymer composite [44].
A widely discussed problem is establishing the mechanism of electrochemical reaction occurring with vanadium oxide-based electrodes in mild zinc-based electrolytes [6,16,18,31,33]. Three possible pathways of reaction are discussed in the literature: traditional Zn2+ (de)intercalation [6,9], dual co-insertion of Zn2+ and H+ (or H3O+) [6,45], and phase transformation during the cycling process [31]. Ex situ XRD analysis confirmed the dual H+/Zn2+ insertion and formation of Zn4(OH)6SO4·4H2O for calcium vanadium oxide bronze cathodes [46], and in situ measurements for V3O7·H2O [47] and NaV3O8·1.5H2O [45]. For the anhydrous V2O5, water-accelerated vanadium dissolution has been reported, and cathodic formation of hydrated oxide was observed by ex situ and in situ XRD and SEM characterization [31]. Besides creation of “pillars” [23], the attempts to suppress dissolution include the addition of Na2SO4 salt to the electrolyte [45] or creating artificial solid electrolyte interphases (SEI) [48].
In this work, we performed a detailed study of structural and electrochemical properties of a cathode material based on vanadium oxide with conducting polymer. The vanadium oxide/PEDOT nanocomposite (VO@PEDOT) was obtained by microwave-assisted synthesis adopted from [49]. This method of synthesis was earlier used for the preparation of cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries [49], but the study of this kind of composite as a cathode in AZIBs was not performed previously. A facile one-step method at temperature 120 °C produced the composite cathode material with enhanced electrochemical performance. Its advantage over conventional hydrothermal methods is the minimal time required for the complete synthesis. The obtained nanocomposite demonstrated outstanding specific capacity, rate capability, and cyclic stability in the (0.3–1.4) V (vs. Zn/Zn2+) potential range. The high electrochemical performance of the VO@PEDOT electrodes was attributed to the formation of nanostructured powder with layered nanosheets structure with thickness of about 30–80 nm, which are assembled into wavy agglomerated more thicker layers up to 0.3–0.6 μm. The phase composition of the samples was determined by XRD analysis, which confirmed lamellar monoclinic V10O24∙12H2O structure with interlayer distance of about 13.6 Å. The mechanism of intercalation processes in the obtained material was systematically studied by ex situ XRD analysis. This allows us to show that initial structure can transform into layered pyrovanadate structure upon Zn2+ intercalation. The functional properties of the obtained cathode material were evaluated by cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) to show applicability in AZIBs. Additionally, the analysis of the results obtained by EIS also presents novelty for the study of vanadium oxide-based composites and provides information on the beneficial effect of a conducting polymer on the charge transfer resistance in composite cathode and on the mass transport kinetics. We have confirmed that the apparent diffusion coefficient for VO@PEDOT is ca. 30 times higher than that of V2O5, which manifests itself in faster ion intercalation process for VO@PEDOT electrode. The effect of a conducting polymer on the vanadium oxide dissolution suppression was also elucidated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of VO@PEDOT Composite

The nanocomposite of vanadium oxide (V10O24) with conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) was synthesized by soft reduction of commercial V2O5 (NevaReaktiv LLC, Saint-Petersburg, Russia) by EDOT (97%, Sigma-Aldrich Corp., Burlington, MA, USA) under microwave radiation according to the procedure adopted from [49]. About 1.1 mmol of V2O5 was mixed with 0.42 mmol of EDOT in aqueous solution in a Pyrex reactor (35 mL). The resulting mixture was kept at 120 °C and 0.421 MPa for 1 h at 290 W microwave power level in a lab microwave system Discover SP (CEM Corp., Matthews, NC, USA). Following that, the obtained dark blue powders were washed with water and ethanol, and dried at 80 °C for 2 h. For the sake of simplicity, further the composite will be denoted as VO@PEDOT.

2.2. Characterization Methods

The powders of the pristine V2O5 and VO@PEDOT composite were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) on a D8 DISCOVER spectrometer (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) using Cu-Kα radiation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) were performed on powders on a SUPRA 40VP electron microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) and Inca X-Act EDX spectrometer (Oxford Instruments GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany), respectively.
Ex situ high-resolution (HR)-XRD studies of the electrode materials were performed after the electrochemical cycling. After extraction of the electrodes from the cells, they were carefully rinsed with DI water and dried in air. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of a VO@PEDOT powder was performed in the (30–600) °C temperature range at a 10 °C/min heat rate in air on a TG 209 F1 Libra thermogravimetric analyzer (NETZSCH-Gerätebau GmbH, Selb, Germany). The X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were measured on the Escalab 250Xi spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an Al Kα source (photon energy of 1486.6 eV). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used to study the states of the elements in the VO@PEDOT before and after electrochemical charge–discharge cycling. The spectra were recorded in the constant pass energy mode at 50 eV for the element core-level spectra and 100 eV for the survey spectra using the X-ray spot size of 650 μm. The overall experimental energy resolution was 0.3 eV. To counter the surface charge caused by the emitting photoelectrons, dual-mode charge compensation (a combination of low-energy electrons and argon ions) was used. XPS measurements were carried out at room temperature under UHV (around 1·10−9 mbar). The spectra were fitted with a product of asymmetric Gaussian and Lorentzian curves.
Comparative study of the solubility of the electrodes based on VO@PEDOT and pristine V2O5 was performed by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (AES-ICP) on a ICP Emission Spectrometer ICPE-9000, (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). 1.5 mg electrode samples (in respect to vanadium oxide active material) of V2O5 and VO@PEDOT were submerged into 15 mL of zinc sulfate solution. The 1 mL samples of the solution were extracted in the first, second, third, fifth, and tenth days after immersion. The samples were diluted 18 times (mainly to decrease Zn sulfate contents) with deionized water, and then the elemental content of vanadium was studied using atomic emission spectroscopy. The calibration was performed for the solutions containing 0.01 mg∙dm−3 to 10 mg∙dm−3 of vanadium species. To estimate the long-term stability of the samples, another sample was extracted and analyzed six months later.

2.3. Electrochemical Characterization

Electrode materials were prepared by mixing the pristine V2O5 and VO@PEDOT with carbon black and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) in a 70:20:10 weight ratio in N-methylpyrrolidone. The resulting viscous slurry was applied on the titanium foil (current collector), vacuum-dried at 60 °C, and roll-pressed. The mass loading of the electroactive material was 1.5–2.0 mg cm−2. Coin cells CR2032 were assembled vs. Zn anode with aqueous 3 mol dm−3 ZnSO4 (JSC LenReactiv, Saint-Petersburg, Russia) as electrolyte and Whatman® glass fiber GF/A as separator.
The potentials in this work are referred to as Zn/Zn2+ redox pair unless stated otherwise. Electrochemical performance of the electrodes was studied using galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) in the (0.3–1.4) V potential range at 25 ± 2 °C. Charge/discharge tests were done using battery testing system CT-4008 (Neware Co., Shenzhen, China) in the (0.3–20) A g−1 current range, CV measurements were carried out on a BCS-805 potentiostat (Biologic Science Instruments, Seyssinet-Pariset, France) at a scan rate of (0.1–1) mV∙s−1.
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were conducted in 10 kHz–0.1 Hz frequency range at 1.4 V potential with 10 mV rms amplitude in a three-electrode electrochemical cell using a BCS-805 potentiostat (Biologic Science Instruments, Seyssinet-Pariset, France).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physical Characterization

The phase composition of the samples was determined by matching the XRD patterns (Figure 1a) with the ICCD data. The initial powder peaks are well-resolved and can be indexed to the orthorhombic V2O5 (ICCD #01-077-2418). The phase composition of the composite was determined by XRD analysis, which confirmed lamellar structure of vanadium oxide with monoclinic V10O24∙12H2O (ICDD #00-025-1006). The peaks are widened, indicating low crystallinity. The most intense peak of the (0,0,2) plane at 6.48° allows to estimate the interlayer distance in V10O24∙12H2O as 13.6 Å. This interlayer spacing is large enough for fast diffusion of intercalated zinc ions.
The XPS measurements were performed, and they showed the characteristic peaks of V, O, S, C elements in the survey spectrum (Figure 1b). The XPS spectra of V 2p (Figure 1c) show the changes occurring with the initial vanadium oxide powder upon the formation of the composite. For the initial V2O5 powder, the peaks at 524.4 eV and 526.0 eV for V 2p3/2 are related to V5+ and V4+, respectively, as per the available literature data [50]. The V 2p3/2–V 2p1/2 splitting value is 7.4 eV. The FWHM values for V 2p3/2 are ca. 1.4 eV, while V 2p1/2 peaks are broadened, as the FWHM values are 2.57 eV, which is a result of the Coster–Kronig effect [51]. The powder has a higher content of V5+, than of V4+, with the 5.9:1 ratio of the areas of the respective peaks. There are two O 1s peaks present: the one at 529.9 eV is typical [50] for oxygen in oxides and agrees well with the V 2p peaks. The second peak at a higher binding energy of 531.4 eV is related to the defective sites in the oxide crystal [52]. As the oxidative polymerization occurs when the composite forms upon the interaction of the initial V2O5 powder and EDOT monomer, the reduction of initial vanadium species is expected. XPS data confirms that assumption, as the ratio of V5+ to V4+ decreases for the composite. Further, the fitting of O 1s area for the composite sample reveals at least one additional peak at ~532.6 eV. This one is due to the aliphatic O-C-O bonds [53] in the PEDOT component of the composite. Additionally, this peak may relate to the oxygen within the structural water [54].
The XPS spectra of C 1s and S 2p (Figure 1d,e) additionally confirm the presence of PEDOT [53,55]. Specifically, the C 1s spectra contain three peaks: the most intense one at 284.3 eV marked as C-C/C=C corresponds either to single or double carbon–carbon bonds, i.e., either to the sp3 C-C bond and/or the sp2 C=C bond (since the corresponding binding energy difference is low, whereas the peak itself is broad, >1 eV FWHM) [56,57,58,59]. Even though there are cases where C-C/C=C peaks can be successfully distinguished [60], in our case the symmetricity was too high, as indicated by a tail mix of 99.9% for the fitted peak and is in line with the previously published research [61,62]. The peak at 285.6 eV is related to C-S bond, and the one at 287.7 eV is for C-O, which agrees with the O 1s spectra. The S 2p spectra contain the peaks typical for the presence of S-O (166.4 eV and 168.8 eV) and C-S bonds (163.1 eV and 164.4 eV) in the sample, which, along with the increase of signal-to-noise ratio as the temperature of the synthesis rises, further confirms the formation of the VO@PEDOT composite, yet the rise of the S-O peak also indicates partial PEDOT decomposition.
The morphology of the obtained samples was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). VO@PEDOT powder has layered nanosheets structure with thickness of about 30–80 nm, which are assembled into wavy agglomerated thicker layers up to 0.3–0.6 μm (Figure 2a,b). The EDX mapping (Figure 2c) for S and V elements confirms the uniformity of their distribution. In particular, sulfur distribution over surface of vanadium oxide grains supports the conclusion on the PEDOT shell. TEM image of as-prepared samples also exhibits thin-layer PEDOT coating of vanadium oxide nanostructure (Figure 2d).
The thermogravimetric analysis in air (Figure 3a) allowed to determine PEDOT content in VO@PEDOT composite. The loss of water moisture causes the initial weight decrease, which goes through two stages: evaporation of free water, followed by the loss of interlayer water [54]. Then the decomposition of PEDOT occurs at ca. 120 °C, with its most intense evaporation starting at 240 °C. The decomposition completes at ~400 °C, and then the vanadium species in VO@PEDOT samples are oxidized to pristine orthorhombic V2O5, with an uptake of oxygen. This is confirmed by an XRD spectrum of the sample after the thermogravimetric analysis (Figure 3b). The content of PEDOT in VO@PEDOT sample is about 6.9%.
The increase of the weight also allows to estimate the ratios between V4+ and V5+ in the initial composite prior to full oxidation into V2O5. Considering the minimum weight as the sum of V2O5 and V2O4 weights, we may then estimate the V5+ to V4+ ratio as 3:1 for VO@PEDOT. This agrees well with the idea of partial reduction of initial V2O5 during the synthesis of nanocomposite.
For comparison the electrical conductivity of initial V2O5 and VO@PEDOT composite was determined using the impedance measurements with blocking electrodes. The conductivity of the VO@PEDOT sample (9.28⋅10−4 S cm−1) is four times as high as that of V2O5 (2.3⋅10−4 S cm−1). The earlier reported [49] conductivity value for an analogous material was lower by an order of magnitude: in our case the conductivity might be higher because of the slightly higher V4+ content in the sample.

3.2. Electrochemical Performance

Electrochemical performance of the electrode materials was evaluated by cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements.
Figure 4 shows the stable CV responses for coin cells with V2O5 and VO@PEDOT, that were obtained after the first ten cycles at a scan rate 0.1 mV∙s−1.
As seen from Figure 4, both CVs profiles demonstrate two pairs of peaks, located at potentials 0.76/0.61 V and 1.03/0.92 V for V2O5-based cathode and at potentials 0.75/0.60 V and 1.09/0.97 V for VO@PEDOT composite cathode. The area under peaks (normalized on the mass of active materials) for VO@PEDOT composite electrode was larger than for V2O5 electrode, which testifies the higher capacity value for composites.
Electrochemical performance of the electrode materials was investigated by galvanostatic charge/discharge (Figure 5). Charge/discharge profiles of VO@PEDOT demonstrated high initial capacity at low current densities (up to 390 mA∙h∙g−1 at 0.3 A∙g−1. The shape of charge and discharge curves is typical for vanadium-based cathodes with two skewed plateaus. It is clearly seen that polarization value is increased with the growth of current, so almost linear E(Q) dependence is observed at high current densities (5 A∙g−1 and more) indicating significant contribution of pseudocapacitive processes. C-rate capability of electrodes at different current densities is presented on Figure 5b. For VO@PEDOT composite material capacities of 357, 326, 274, 192, 137, and 101 mA∙h∙g−1 were obtained at current densities of 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, and 20 A∙g−1. In all cases these values are higher than for V2O5-based cathode which was previously activated at low current density. The capacities of V2O5 are 261, 217, 170, 110, 24, 11, and 0 mA∙h∙g−1 in the same current range. Nevertheless, for both electrode materials at 0.3 A∙g−1 after the cyclability tests the delivered capacities were the same as the initial ones, so the materials are not destructed during tests at high current densities. Cyclic stability of VO@PEDOT were recorded at 2 and 5 A∙g−1 over 1000 cycles (Figure 5c). At both current densities first a capacity increase and then a slight capacity drop were detected. At 2 A∙g−1, the maximum of capacity is achieved by the 175th cycle (310 mA∙h∙g−1). After that, the capacity decreases until the final value of 228 mA∙h∙g−1 is recorded. The capacity retention from the first cycle thus exceeds 100%, which means the material retains 73.5% of the maximum value.
At 5 A∙g−1, the specific capacity of VO@PEDOT electrode is 150 mA∙h∙g−1 initially, which rises to 225 mA∙h∙g−1 by the 370th cycle, and then decreases again to 170 mA∙h∙g−1 by the 1000th cycle. Again, the capacity retention exceeds 100% of the starting value, yet the final capacity is 75.5% of the maximum value. So, the VO@PEDOT electrode delivers the highest specific capacity values at every current density applied, likely due to facilitated kinetics of Zn2+ (de)intercalation.
These results are on par with the cyclic stability and rate capability of other state-of-the-art vanadium oxide-based composite materials [19,42,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70], the functional properties of which are compared in Figure 6 and presented in the Table S1. As it can be seen, the performance of the materials in this work is on par with the state-of-the-art level for composite cathodes for AZIBs.
We should note that our synthesis procedure results in noticeable degree of reduction of V5+ into V4+, which means that structural transformations of the oxides occur, and PEDOT component is not the only beneficial contribution into the properties of the electrode materials. The oxide V10O24 is formed during the reductive synthesis may have a more advantageous structure for reversible and facile Zn2+ (de)insertion.
To estimate the contribution of diffusion-controlled and capacitive-controlled currents into the total measured currents, we performed CV measurements in the 0.3–1.4 V range at the scan rates from 0.1 mV∙s−1 to 1 mV∙s−1 (Figure 7a). The shape of the CVs at various scan rates is similar for VO@PEDOT electrodes with slight potential shifting. The dependence of the peak current (i) on the scan rate (v) can be represented via (1):
i = a · v b
which can be represented in logarithmic form (2):
log   i = b · log   v +   log   a
Here values a and b are constants. The constant b is usually in the 0.5 to 1.0 range, where the proximity to either 0.5 or 1.0 formally means that the current is controlled either by diffusion of the ions, or by pseudo-capacitive processes, respectively.
As seen from Figure 7b, for VO@PEDOT the b values indicate significant contribution of capacitive processes over all redox peaks, with 0.85/0.88 values for the leftmost pair of peaks and 0.95/0.81 for the rightmost one. The predominant pseudocapacitive control of current in the case of VO@PEDOT agrees well with the results reported for other V2O5-polymer composites [39,42,65,69,71].
The kinetics of the electrode processes was investigated by EIS measurements in three-electrode cell with 3 mol∙dm−3 ZnSO4 electrolyte solution. The impedance spectra (Figure 7c) were recorded in 10 kHz to 100 mHz frequencies range at 1.4 V after 10 GCD cycles at 0.1 A∙g−1. In the recorded spectra, the determined Rct value was 9.2 Ω for V2O5, 2.2 Ω for VO@PEDOT. In agreement with reported enhanced capacity values, the VO@PEDOT electrode also has a lower Rct value, which explains the facilitation of charge transport and hence can increase the capacity values of this material.
The appearance of Warburg type regions on EIS spectra with slope close to 45° (Figure 7c) indicates diffusion control of charge transport in the bulk of material. We calculated the Warburg constant values (σw) for the studied systems via the slope of the ZRe,ZIm vs. ω−0.5 linear dependencies (Figure 8). The value σw was 6.7 Ω·s−0.5 for the electrodes based on an unmodified V2O5, and lower value 1.2 Ω·s−0.5 for the VO@PEDOT electrodes. These values can further be used for the calculation of apparent diffusion coefficients via applicable formulae. For the standard inverse-square law between σw and ω−0.5, and considering the absence of other factors affecting the mass transport kinetics, the apparent diffusion coefficient for VO@PEDOT should be ca. 30 times as large as for V2O5. Thus, the obtained data confirm the faster ion intercalation process for VO@PEDOT electrode.

3.3. Mechanism Study

The ex situ XRD patterns (Figure 9) allow to elucidate the mechanism of Zn2+ intercalation into VO@PEDOT and the evolution of the composite structure. The spectra obtained at specific potentials during charge and discharge processes at 0.1 A∙g−1 allow to see the transformations in detail. All but the powder one spectra contain the peaks at 35.17°, 38.43°, 40.2°, 53.02°, and 62.96° of the titanium foil current collector (ICCD #00-044-1294). The peaks at 5–9° are related to the interlayer reflex (0,0,2) of V10O24∙12H2O (JCPDS #25-1006) [68]. Upon immersing the electrode into ZnSO4 at charging it to 1.4 V, the peak shifts to a more positive area. The shift of the reflection is due to water molecules and Zn2+ insertion into the interlayer space accompanied by electrostatic layers compression.
Then, upon the discharge to 0.6 V, well-resolved peaks emerge corresponding to the monoclinic zinc pyrovanadate Zn3(OH)2V2O7⋅2H2O (ICCD 00-057-0572) [31,72] while the V10O24∙12H2O-related peaks at 5–9° disappear. Further discharge to 0.3 V results in the increase of the peaks related to zinc pyrovanadate. As the pyrovanadate contains V5+ atoms in its structure, the discharge must include its reduction to V4+ or even (at least partially) to V3+, accompanied by Zn2+ or protons intercalation. This would make the exact formula differ from the matching XRD, e.g., Zn3V4+2O7 might describe the reduced state of the electrode material, with even further reduction forming a mixed valence compound Zn3+xV4+2−2xV3+2+2xO7, where 0 ≤ x ≤ 1. This condition is necessary to satisfy the conditions of charge accumulation and zinc storage, though it is worth noting that the XRD pattern still matches the pyrovanadate one in the fully reduced state, which might indicate the rigidity and stability of the obtained structure. Similar observations on reduction of electrode materials to pyrovanadate analogue structure have also been reported for V2O5 [73] and V2O5⋅nH2O/polypyrrole [65].
The reverse process of oxidation to 1.4 V results in gradual disappearance of pyrovanadate-related peaks. Narrow peaks and this high crystallinity of the sample at 0.3 V might indicate saturation of the structure by zinc ions until a stable well-ordered structure is obtained. The peaks related to the Zn4(OH)6SO4⋅nH2O (commonly referred to as zinc hydroxide sulfate (ZHS)) that have been observed in some other works [25,74,75], are absent in our case, which might indicate negligible content of ZHS in the prepared samples, as the existence of ZHS is heavily pH-dependent [76]. As noted in the work [77], when preparing ex situ electrodes, ZHS precipitate can be washed off and not be identified, therefore ex situ XRD data are not enough.
The reflection at 25.7° (Figure 10) related to the (111) plane of V10O24∙12H2O is preserved at each potential during charging and discharging. The transformation of the structure during the discharge shifts this peak to the lower angles, and then the peak returns to the initial position upon charging. Thus, the results of ex situ XRD show both the transformation of vanadium oxide structure within the VO@PEDOT composite and the reversibility of Zn2+ (de)intercalation. In addition to that, these results show that a novel phase emerges from V10O24∙12H2O upon recharging, while earlier data reported mainly on the intercalation-related peaks shifting [68,70,72]. This observation is likely caused by differences in morphology and presence of the conducting polymer within the cathode material.
The XPS spectra of O 1s and V 2p (Figure 11a), and Zn 2p (Figure 11b) obtained for VO@PEDOT electrodes in fully discharged (0.3 V) and fully charged (1.4 V) states after the first cycle show that the charged state resembles the initial VO@PEDOT powder (see also survey spectra in Figure S1). For the charged state, the V5+ peak prevails, and there is less V4+ (V5+:V4+ ratio is ca. 3.5:1). Yet the XPS of the sample in a discharged state shows that the amount of V4+ increases insignificantly. Additionally, the Zn 2p spectra of the identical electrodes in charged and discharged states show that the zinc content increases in the discharged state. Estimated ratios of Zn 2p3/2 to V 2p3/2 peaks in the charged and discharged states are 1.34 and 1.97, meaning that zinc content in the discharged state is 1.5 times higher than in the charged state, roughly in agreement with XRD data.
Moreover, EDX mapping of Zn and V elements for VO@PEDOT electrode in the charged and discharged states, as well as elemental composition analysis, showed that Zn to V atomic ratio is 1:1.27 in the discharged state and 1:2.47 in the charged state, which confirms the intercalation of Zn2+ into the material structure upon discharging. Ex situ SEM/EDX studies of the VO@PEDOT samples in the discharged state did not register any evidence of Zn4(OH)6SO4∙xH2O presence, which might indicate both its low generation and possibility of its dissolution upon samples preparation.
The dissolution of the electrodes containing orthorhombic V2O5 and VO@PEDOT composite in the 3 mol∙dm−3 ZnSO4 solution allowed to estimate the stability of the materials without any electrochemical processes running, which is essential for preserving the electrode materials without the cells for prolonged shelf and service life.
The results of AES-ICP analysis of vanadium content in 3 mol∙dm−3 ZnSO4 electrolyte (Table 1) show that VO@PEDOT composite dissolves at the lowest rate. After six months, the vanadium species content in VO@PEDOT solution is only 6.53 mg∙dm−3, whereas opposed to V2O5 solution with 57.8 mg∙dm−3 (one order higher) vanadium concentration.
Thus, the inclusion of PEDOT into the material structure further inhibits vanadium oxide dissolution in 3 M ZnSO4 at stationary conditions, which is also a key factor for improvement of electrochemical performance.
Such slow dissolution of VO@PEDOT composite is beneficial for its use in commercial devices, as it can preserve the material the longest in stationary conditions, which complements its splendid charge–discharge performance.

4. Conclusions

The vanadium oxide/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanocomposite VO@PEDOT was successfully synthesized by a facile one-step microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis and tested as cathode in aqueous zinc-ion batteries. The initial composite obtained has layered nanosheets structure with thickness of about 30–80 nm, which are assembled into wavy agglomerated thicker layers up to 0.3–0.6 μm. The phase composition of vanadium oxide was determined by XRD analysis, which confirmed lamellar structure of V10O24∙12H2O with interlayer distance of about 13.6 Å.
The VO@PEDOT electrode shows an excellent electrochemical performance, reaching specific capacities of up to 390 mA∙h∙g−1 at 0.3 A∙g−1 and retains the specific capacity value of 100 mA∙h∙g−1 at a high current density of 20 A∙g−1.
In contrast with pristine V2O5 based cathode, an activation process usually observed for such materials was almost absent for VO@PEDOT. The AES analysis of vanadium content in 3 mol∙dm−3 ZnSO4 electrolyte showed the lowest rate of dissolution of VO@PEDOT. After six months, the vanadium species content in electrolyte solution is only 6.53 mg∙dm−3, as opposed to V2O5 solution with 57.8 mg∙dm−3 (one order higher) vanadium concentration.
The phase transformations during the cycling of VO@PEDOT electrodes at different degrees of charge/discharge were demonstrated by using ex situ XRD measurements. It allows us to conclude that the reversible zinc ion intercalation occurs in stable zinc pyrovanadate structures formed during discharge.
The outstanding electrochemical performance of VO@PEDOT composite cathodes confirm that pre-intercalation of conducting polymers into vanadium oxide structures is an advantageous way to improve functional characteristics of AZIB cathodes due to several factors: (i) Enhanced surface electronic conductivity and tight electrical contact over surface of active grains; (ii) increased diffusion of intercalated ions due to enlarged interlayer space; (iii) PEDOT essentially inhibits vanadium oxide dissolution in aqueous electrolytes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12213896/s1. Figure S1: Ex situ XPS survey spectra of VO@PEDOT electrode materials: (a) in the charged state; (b) in the discharged state. Table S1: The comparison of the VO@PEDOT cathode with other V2O5-based cathodes for Zn-ion batteries. The following references are also mentioned in Supplementary Materials: [37,39,41,42,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,78,79,80,81].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.N.E., E.G.T. and V.V.K.; methodology, S.N.E., M.A.K. and O.V.G.; validation, S.N.E. and A.I.V.; formal analysis, F.S.V., M.A.K. and A.I.V.; investigation, F.S.V., S.N.E., E.G.T. and O.V.G.; resources, V.V.K.; data curation, F.S.V., M.A.K. and A.I.V.; writing—original draft preparation, F.S.V., S.N.E., M.A.K. and A.I.V.; writing—review and editing, A.I.V.; E.G.T., L.F. and V.V.K.; visualization, F.S.V., M.A.K. and A.I.V.; supervision, S.N.E. and L.F.; project administration, V.V.K.; funding acquisition, L.F. and V.V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant number 21-53-53012.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be available upon request from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Centre for X-ray Diffraction Studies, the Interdisciplinary Resource Centre for Nanotechnology, the Centre for Physical Methods of Surface Investigation, the Thermogravimetric and Calorimetric Research Centre, the Chemical Analysis and Materials Research Centre and the Centre for Optical and Laser Materials Research of the Research Park of Saint Petersburg State University. We also thank Aleksandra Koroleva and Dmitrii Pudikov of the Centre for Physical Methods of Surface Investigation for their expertise in XPS method.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Armand, M.; Tarascon, J.M. Building better batteries. Nature 2008, 451, 652–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Goodenough, J.B.; Park, K.S. The Li-ion rechargeable battery: A perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zeng, X.; Hao, J.; Wang, Z.; Mao, J.; Guo, Z. Recent progress and perspectives on aqueous Zn-based rechargeable batteries with mild aqueous electrolytes. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 20, 410–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. He, P.; Chen, Q.; Yan, M.; Xu, X.; Zhou, L.; Mai, L.; Nan, C.W. Building better zinc-ion batteries: A materials perspective. EnergyChem 2019, 1, 100022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fang, G.; Zhou, J.; Pan, A.; Liang, S. Recent Advances in Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2480–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Blanc, L.E.; Kundu, D.; Nazar, L.F. Scientific Challenges for the Implementation of Zn-Ion Batteries. Joule 2020, 4, 771–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, C.; Li, B.; Du, H.; Kang, F. Energetic zinc ion chemistry: The rechargeable zinc ion battery. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 933–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, N.; Cheng, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Lei, K.; Chen, C.; Liu, X.; Chen, J. Cation-Deficient Spinel ZnMn2O4 Cathode in Zn(CF3SO3)2 Electrolyte for Rechargeable Aqueous Zn-Ion Battery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12894–12901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Xi, B.; Chen, W.; Jia, Y.; Feng, J.; Xiong, S. Advances and Perspectives of Cathode Storage Chemistry in Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 9244–9272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, L.; An, Q.; Mai, L. Recent Advances and Prospects of Cathode Materials for Rechargeable Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1900387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Y.; Wu, X. Review of vanadium-based electrode materials for rechargeable aqueous zinc ion batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 56, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yi, T.F.; Qiu, L.; Qu, J.P.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhu, Y.R. Towards high-performance cathodes: Design and energy storage mechanism of vanadium oxides-based materials for aqueous Zn-ion batteries. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 446, 214124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zampardi, G.; La Mantia, F. Prussian blue analogues as aqueous Zn-ion batteries electrodes: Current challenges and future perspectives. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020, 21, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, C.; Zhang, X.; He, W.; Xu, G.; Sun, R. Cathode materials for rechargeable zinc-ion batteries: From synthesis to mechanism and applications. J. Power Sources 2020, 449, 227596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, T.; Fan, H.J. Understanding cathode materials in aqueous zinc–organic batteries. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2021, 30, 100799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zuo, S.; Xu, X.; Ji, S.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J. Cathodes for Aqueous Zn-Ion Batteries: Materials, Mechanisms, and Kinetics. Chem. A Eur. J. 2021, 27, 830–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, Y.; Song, T.Y.; Chen, L.N. A review on recent developments of vanadium-based cathode for rechargeable zinc-ion batteries. Tungsten 2021, 3, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, G.; Li, Q.; Ma, K.; Hong, C.; Wang, C. The degradation mechanism of vanadium oxide-based aqueous zinc-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 8084–8095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Liang, S.; Wu, Z.; Fang, G.; Cao, X.; Wang, C.; Lin, T.; Pan, A.; Zhou, J. Transition metal ion-preintercalated V2O5 as high-performance aqueous zinc-ion battery cathode with broad temperature adaptability. Nano Energy 2019, 61, 617–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, J.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Huang, C.; Cui, M.; Hu, T.; Meng, C.; Zhang, Y. “Three-in-One” Strategy that Ensures V2O5·nH2O with Superior Zn2+ Storage by Simultaneous Protonated Polyaniline Intercalation and Encapsulation. Small Struct. 2022, 3, 2100212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, W.; Zuo, C.; Tang, C.; Tang, W.; Lan, B.; Fu, X.; Dong, S.; Luo, P. The Current Developments and Perspectives of V2O5 as Cathode for Rechargeable Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Energy Technol. 2021, 9, 2000789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, X.; Sun, X.; Li, X.; Hu, X.; Cai, S.; Zheng, C. Recent progress in rate and cycling performance modifications of vanadium oxides cathode for lithium-ion batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 59, 343–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, W.; He, D.; Fang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, R.; Xue, W. Pillaring of a conductive polymer in layered V2O5 boosting ultra-fast Zn2+/H+ storage in aqueous media. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 416, 140270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dai, X.; Wan, F.; Zhang, L.; Cao, H.; Niu, Z. Freestanding graphene/VO2 composite films for highly stable aqueous Zn-ion batteries with superior rate performance. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 17, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, X.; Mao, L.; Cheng, Q.; Liao, F.; Yang, G.; Chen, L. Dual-cation preintercalated and amorphous carbon confined vanadium oxides as a superior cathode for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Carbon 2022, 186, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, G.; Wu, T.; Zhou, H.; Jin, H.; Liu, K.; Luo, Y.; Jiang, H.; Huang, K.; Huang, L.; Zhou, J. Rich Alkali Ions Preintercalated Vanadium Oxides for Durable and Fast Zinc-Ion Storage. ACS Energy Lett. 2021, 6, 2111–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Khairy, M.; Tinet, D.; Van Damme, H. The synthesis of pillared vanadium oxide. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1990, 856–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vujković, M.J.; Mladenović, D.; Milović, M.; Petrović, T.; Bajuk-Bogdanović, D.; Šljukić Paunković, B.; Mentus, S. Sodium-pillared vanadium oxides as next-gen materials: Does co-inserted water control the cyclic stability of vanadates in an aqueous electrolyte? Electrochim. Acta 2022, 425, 140603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dong, Y.; Deng, S.; Ma, Z.; Yin, G.; Li, C.; Yuan, X.; Tan, H.; Pan, J.; Mai, L.; Xia, F. Sodium vanadium oxides: From nanostructured design to high-performance energy storage materials. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 121, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yan, M.; He, P.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Wei, Q.; Zhao, K.; Xu, X.; An, Q.; Shuang, Y.; Shao, Y.; et al. Water-Lubricated Intercalation in V2O5·nH2O for High-Capacity and High-Rate Aqueous Rechargeable Zinc Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1703725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhu, K.; Wu, T.; Huang, K. Understanding the Dissolution and Phase Transformation Mechanisms in Aqueous Zn/α-V2O5 Batteries. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 4089–4098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lv, T.T.; Liu, Y.Y.; Wang, H.; Yang, S.Y.; Liu, C.S.; Pang, H. Crystal water enlarging the interlayer spacing of ultrathin V2O5·4VO2·2.72H2O nanobelts for high-performance aqueous zinc-ion battery. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 411, 128533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, T.; Zhu, K.; Qin, C.; Huang, K. Unraveling the role of structural water in bilayer V2O5 during Zn2+-intercalation: Insights from DFT calculations. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 5612–5620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhu, K.; Wu, T.; Huang, K. NaCa0.6V6O16·3H2O as an Ultra-Stable Cathode for Zn-Ion Batteries: The Roles of Pre-Inserted Dual-Cations and Structural Water in V3O8 Layer. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1901968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, T.H.; Liang, W.Y. Reduced Intercalation Energy Barrier by Rich Structural Water in Spinel ZnMn2O4for High-Rate Zinc-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 23822–23832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shin, J.; Choi, D.S.; Lee, H.J.; Jung, Y.; Choi, J.W. Hydrated Intercalation for High-Performance Aqueous Zinc Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1900083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dong, R.; Zhang, T.; Liu, J.; Li, H.; Hu, D.; Liu, X.; Xu, Q. Mechanistic Insight into Polypyrrole Coating on V2O5 Cathode for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Battery. ChemElectroChem 2022, 9, e202101441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, Y.; Xu, L.; Jiang, H.; Liu, Y.; Meng, C. Polyaniline-expanded the interlayer spacing of hydrated vanadium pentoxide by the interface-intercalation for aqueous rechargeable Zn-ion batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 603, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, S.; Wei, X.; Wu, C.; Zhang, B.; Wu, S.; Lin, Z. Constructing Three-Dimensional Structured V2O5/Conductive Polymer Composite with Fast Ion/Electron Transfer Kinetics for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Battery. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 4208–4216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, R.; Zhang, H.; Yan, J.; Zheng, Q.; Li, X. A novel 3-phenylpropylamine intercalated molecular bronze with ultrahigh layer spacing as a high-rate and stable cathode for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Fundam. Res. 2021, 1, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, D.; Wang, H.; Li, F.; Guan, Z.; Wang, R.; He, B.; Gong, Y.; Hu, X. Conformal Conducting Polymer Shells on V2O5 Nanosheet Arrays as a High-Rate and Stable Zinc-Ion Battery Cathode. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1801506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, X.; Xu, G.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, S.; Li, L.; Wei, X.; Cao, J.; Yang, L.; Chu, P.K. Ultrathin hybrid nanobelts of single-crystalline VO2 and Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) as cathode materials for aqueous zinc ion batteries with large capacity and high-rate capability. J. Power Sources 2020, 463, 228223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bin, D.; Huo, W.; Yuan, Y.; Huang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, F.; Wang, Y.; Xia, Y. Organic-Inorganic-Induced Polymer Intercalation into Layered Composites for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Battery. Chem 2020, 6, 968–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Volkov, F.S.; Tolstopjatova, E.G.; Eliseeva, S.N.; Kamenskii, M.A.; Vypritskaia, A.I.; Volkov, A.I.; Kondratiev, V.V. Vanadium(V) oxide coated by poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) as cathode for aqueous zinc-ion batteries with improved electrochemical performance. Mater. Lett. 2022, 308, 131210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wan, F.; Zhang, L.; Dai, X.; Wang, X.; Niu, Z.; Chen, J. Aqueous rechargeable zinc/sodium vanadate batteries with enhanced performance from simultaneous insertion of dual carriers. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Xia, C.; Guo, J.; Li, P.; Zhang, X.; Alshareef, H.N. Highly Stable Aqueous Zinc-Ion Storage Using a Layered Calcium Vanadium Oxide Bronze Cathode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 3943–3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Oberholzer, P.; Tervoort, E.; Bouzid, A.; Pasquarello, A.; Kundu, D. Oxide versus Nonoxide Cathode Materials for Aqueous Zn Batteries: An Insight into the Charge Storage Mechanism and Consequences Thereof. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 674–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Guo, J.; Ming, J.; Lei, Y.; Zhang, W.; Xia, C.; Cui, Y.; Alshareef, H.N. Artificial Solid Electrolyte Interphase for Suppressing Surface Reactions and Cathode Dissolution in Aqueous Zinc Ion Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 2776–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Murugan, A.V.; Kwon, C.W.; Campet, G.; Kale, B.B.; Mandale, A.B.; Sainker, S.R.; Gopinath, C.S.; Vijayamohanan, K. A novel approach to prepare poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanoribbons between V2O5 layers by microwave irradiation. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 10736–10742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Biesinger, M.C.; Lau, L.W.M.; Gerson, A.R.; Smart, R.S.C. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Sc, Ti, V., Cu and Zn. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 257, 887–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Silversmit, G.; Depla, D.; Poelman, H.; Marin, G.B.; De Gryse, R. An XPS study on the surface reduction of V2O5 (0 0 1) induced by Ar+ ion bombardment. Surf. Sci. 2006, 600, 3512–3517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Biesinger, M.C.; Payne, B.P.; Lau, L.W.M.; Gerson, A.; Smart, R.S.C. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic chemical state Quantification of mixed nickel metal, oxide and hydroxide systems. Surf. Interface Anal. 2009, 41, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Beamson, G.; Briggs, D. High Resolution XPS of Organic Polymers: The Scienta ESCA300 Database; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1992; ISBN 0471935921. [Google Scholar]
  54. Chen, H.; Huang, J.; Tian, S.; Liu, L.; Qin, T.; Song, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; Lei, S.; et al. Interlayer Modification of Pseudocapacitive Vanadium Oxide and Zn(H2O)n2+ Migration Regulation for Ultrahigh Rate and Durable Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2004924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Et Taouil, A.; Lallemand, F.; Hihn, J.Y.; Melot, J.M.; Blondeau-Patissier, V.; Lakard, B. Doping properties of PEDOT films electrosynthesized under high frequency ultrasound irradiation. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2011, 18, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ushakova, E.E.; Frolov, A.; Reveguk, A.A.; Usachov, D.Y.; Itkis, D.M.; Yashina, L.V. Solid electrolyte interface formation between lithium and PEO-based electrolyte. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 589, 153014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mitraka, E.; Jafari, M.J.; Vagin, M.; Liu, X.; Fahlman, M.; Ederth, T.; Berggren, M.; Jonsson, M.P.; Crispin, X. Oxygen-induced doping on reduced PEDOT. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 4404–4412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Lien, S.-Y.; Lin, P.-C.; Chen, W.-R.; Liu, C.-H.; Lee, K.-W.; Wang, N.-F.; Huang, C.-J. The Mechanism of PEDOT:PSS Films with Organic Additives. Crystals 2022, 12, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhan, L.; Song, Z.; Zhang, J.; Tang, J.; Zhan, H.; Zhou, Y.; Zhan, C. PEDOT: Cathode active material with high specific capacity in novel electrolyte system. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 8319–8323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rabchinskii, M.K.; Saveliev, S.D.; Stolyarova, D.Y.; Brzhezinskaya, M.; Kirilenko, D.A.; Baidakova, M.V.; Ryzhkov, S.A.; Shnitov, V.V.; Sysoev, V.V.; Brunkov, P.N. Modulating nitrogen species via N-doping and post annealing of graphene derivatives: XPS and XAS examination. Carbon 2021, 182, 593–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, S.; Chen, Y.; He, X.; Mao, X.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, J.; Yang, Y. Modifying Reduced Graphene Oxide by Conducting Polymer Through a Hydrothermal Polymerization Method and its Application as Energy Storage Electrodes. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yan, Y.; Jamal, R.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, W.; Ge, Y.; Liu, Y.; Abdiryim, T. Composites of thiol-grafted PEDOT with N-doped graphene or graphitic carbon nitride as an electrochemical sensor for the detection of paracetamol. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 5571–5586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, Y.; Huang, Z.; Kalambate, P.K.; Zhong, Y.; Huang, Z.; Xie, M.; Shen, Y.; Huang, Y. V2O5 nanopaper as a cathode material with high capacity and long cycle life for rechargeable aqueous zinc-ion battery. Nano Energy 2019, 60, 752–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Du, Y.; Wang, X.; Man, J.; Sun, J. A novel organic-inorganic hybrid V2O5@polyaniline as high-performance cathode for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Mater. Lett. 2020, 272, 127813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Feng, Z.; Sun, J.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Hu, T.; Cui, M.; Tian, F.; Meng, C.; Zhang, Y. Polypyrrole-intercalation tuning lamellar structure of V2O5·nH2O boosts fast zinc-ion kinetics for aqueous zinc-ion battery. J. Power Sources 2022, 536, 231489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, Q.; Wei, T.; Ma, K.; Yang, G.; Wang, C. Boosting the Cyclic Stability of Aqueous Zinc-Ion Battery Based on Al-Doped V10O24·12H2O Cathode Materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 20888–20894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wu, W.; Wang, S.; Zhang, C.; Hou, S.; Zhang, L. Facile and Scalable Synthesis of 3D Structures of V10O24·12H2O Nanosheets Coated with Carbon toward Ultrafast and Ultrastable Zinc Storage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 18704–18712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wei, T.; Li, Q.; Yang, G.; Wang, C. High-rate and durable aqueous zinc ion battery using dendritic V10O24·12H2O cathode material with large interlamellar spacing. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 287, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yan, H.; Ru, Q.; Gao, P.; Shi, Z.; Gao, Y.; Chen, F.; Chi-Chun Ling, F.; Wei, L. Organic pillars pre-intercalated V4+-V2O5·3H2O nanocomposites with enlarged interlayer and mixed valence for aqueous Zn-ion storage. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 534, 147608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, W.; Dong, L.; Jiang, B.; Huang, Y.; Wang, X.; Xu, C.; Kang, Z.; Mou, J.; Kang, F. Layered vanadium oxides with proton and zinc ion insertion for zinc ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 320, 134565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, R.; Xing, F.; Li, T.; Zhang, H.; Yan, J.; Zheng, Q.; Li, X. Intercalated polyaniline in V2O5 as a unique vanadium oxide bronze cathode for highly stable aqueous zinc ion battery. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 38, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, S.; Wei, X.; Chen, H.; Lai, G.; Wang, X.; Zhang, S.; Wu, S.; Tang, W.; Lin, Z. A mixed-valent vanadium oxide cathode with ultrahigh rate capability for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 22392–22398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chen, X.; Wang, L.; Li, H.; Cheng, F.; Chen, J. Porous V2O5 nanofibers as cathode materials for rechargeable aqueous zinc-ion batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2019, 38, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Lin, Z.; Shi, H.Y.; Lin, L.; Yang, X.; Wu, W.; Sun, X. A high capacity small molecule quinone cathode for rechargeable aqueous zinc-organic batteries. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Tong, Y.; Li, X.; Su, S.; Li, J.; Fang, J.; Liang, B.; Hou, J.; Luo, M. Hydrated lithium ions intercalated V2O5 with dual-ion synergistic insertion mechanism for high-performance aqueous zinc-ion batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 606, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Lee, B.; Seo, H.R.; Lee, H.R.; Yoon, C.S.; Kim, J.H.; Chung, K.Y.; Cho, B.W.; Oh, S.H. Critical Role of pH Evolution of Electrolyte in the Reaction Mechanism for Rechargeable Zinc Batteries. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 2948–2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kundu, D.; Hosseini Vajargah, S.; Wan, L.; Adams, B.; Prendergast, D.; Nazar, L.F. Aqueous: Vs. nonaqueous Zn-ion batteries: Consequences of the desolvation penalty at the interface. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 881–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chen, S.; Li, K.; Hui, K.S.; Zhang, J. Regulation of Lamellar Structure of Vanadium Oxide via Polyaniline Intercalation for High-Performance Aqueous Zinc-Ion Battery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2003890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yin, C.; Pan, C.; Liao, X.; Pan, Y.; Yuan, L. Regulating the Interlayer Spacing of Vanadium Oxide by In Situ Polyaniline Intercalation Enables an Improved Aqueous Zinc-Ion Storage Performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 39347–39354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, Z.; Tang, X.; Yuan, S.; Bai, M.; Wang, H.; Liu, S.; Zhang, M.; Ma, Y. Engineering Vanadium Pentoxide Cathode for the Zero-Strain Cation Storage via a Scalable Intercalation-Polymerization Approach. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2100164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yao, Z.; Wu, Q.; Chen, K.; Liu, J.; Li, C. Shallow-layer pillaring of a conductive polymer in monolithic grains to drive superior zinc storage: Via a cascading effect. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 3149–3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the powders of the precursor V2O5 powder and VO@PEDOT composite (a); XPS survey spectrum of VO@PEDOT powder (b); XPS spectra of VO@PEDOT powder in O 1s and V 2p (c), C 1s (d), and S 2p regions (e).
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the powders of the precursor V2O5 powder and VO@PEDOT composite (a); XPS survey spectrum of VO@PEDOT powder (b); XPS spectra of VO@PEDOT powder in O 1s and V 2p (c), C 1s (d), and S 2p regions (e).
Nanomaterials 12 03896 g001
Figure 2. (a,b) SEM images of VO@PEDOT; (c) SEM image with the corresponding EDX mapping of V and S elements; (d) TEM image of VO@PEDOT.
Figure 2. (a,b) SEM images of VO@PEDOT; (c) SEM image with the corresponding EDX mapping of V and S elements; (d) TEM image of VO@PEDOT.
Nanomaterials 12 03896 g002
Figure 3. (a) TGA curve for VO@PEDOT and (b) its XRD pattern after TGA.
Figure 3. (a) TGA curve for VO@PEDOT and (b) its XRD pattern after TGA.
Nanomaterials 12 03896 g003
Figure 4. CV curves (10th cycle) of V2O5 and VO@PEDOT at a scan rate of 0.1 mV∙s−1.
Figure 4. CV curves (10th cycle) of V2O5 and VO@PEDOT at a scan rate of 0.1 mV∙s−1.
Nanomaterials 12 03896 g004
Figure 5. (a) GCD curves for VO@PEDOT at current densities from 0.3 A∙g−1 to 20 A∙g−1 (dashed line is at 0.3 A∙g−1 after all other currents); (b) C-rate performance of VO@PEDOT with comparison to initial V2O5 electrodes (after 10 cycles of activation); (c) GCD cycling performance of VO@PEDOT at 2 A∙g−1 and 5 A∙g−1.
Figure 5. (a) GCD curves for VO@PEDOT at current densities from 0.3 A∙g−1 to 20 A∙g−1 (dashed line is at 0.3 A∙g−1 after all other currents); (b) C-rate performance of VO@PEDOT with comparison to initial V2O5 electrodes (after 10 cycles of activation); (c) GCD cycling performance of VO@PEDOT at 2 A∙g−1 and 5 A∙g−1.
Nanomaterials 12 03896 g005
Figure 6. The comparison of the VO@PEDOT cathode with other V2O5-based cathodes for Zn-ion batteries [19,42,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71].
Figure 6. The comparison of the VO@PEDOT cathode with other V2O5-based cathodes for Zn-ion batteries [19,42,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71].
Nanomaterials 12 03896 g006
Figure 7. (a) CV curves for VO@PEDOT with different scan rates; (b) log (i) vs. log (v) curves of cathodic and anodic peaks of CV curves; (c) EIS spectra of the initial V2O5 and VO@PEDOT in 10 kHz to 100 mHz range at 1.4 V.
Figure 7. (a) CV curves for VO@PEDOT with different scan rates; (b) log (i) vs. log (v) curves of cathodic and anodic peaks of CV curves; (c) EIS spectra of the initial V2O5 and VO@PEDOT in 10 kHz to 100 mHz range at 1.4 V.
Nanomaterials 12 03896 g007
Figure 8. ZRe, −ZIm vs. ω−0.5 plots obtained from the EIS spectra for V2O5 (a) and VO@PEDOT (b) electrodes. Linear fit was performed for the points in the Warburg region (i.e., at the straight line with a phase of 45° in Nyquist plot).
Figure 8. ZRe, −ZIm vs. ω−0.5 plots obtained from the EIS spectra for V2O5 (a) and VO@PEDOT (b) electrodes. Linear fit was performed for the points in the Warburg region (i.e., at the straight line with a phase of 45° in Nyquist plot).
Nanomaterials 12 03896 g008
Figure 9. Ex situ XRD patterns of the VO@PEDOT electrode at various stages within the first discharge–charge cycle and the corresponding state-of-charge curve with the marked points of the potentials for XRD studies.
Figure 9. Ex situ XRD patterns of the VO@PEDOT electrode at various stages within the first discharge–charge cycle and the corresponding state-of-charge curve with the marked points of the potentials for XRD studies.
Nanomaterials 12 03896 g009
Figure 10. Ex situ XRD patterns of VO@PEDOT electrode upon the first discharge–charge cycle at 23–28°.
Figure 10. Ex situ XRD patterns of VO@PEDOT electrode upon the first discharge–charge cycle at 23–28°.
Nanomaterials 12 03896 g010
Figure 11. XPS spectra of V 2p (a) and Zn 2p (b) for VO@PEDOT electrode in the charged and discharged states.
Figure 11. XPS spectra of V 2p (a) and Zn 2p (b) for VO@PEDOT electrode in the charged and discharged states.
Nanomaterials 12 03896 g011
Table 1. Solubility results for V2O5 and VO@PEDOT in 3 mol∙dm−3 ZnSO4.
Table 1. Solubility results for V2O5 and VO@PEDOT in 3 mol∙dm−3 ZnSO4.
CathodeDay 1, mg∙dm−3Day 2, mg∙dm−3Day 3, mg∙dm−3Day 5, mg∙dm−3Day 10, mg∙dm−3Month 6, mg∙dm−3
V2O50.721.141.341.862.4257.8
VO@PEDOT0.600.700.991.561.876.53
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Volkov, F.S.; Eliseeva, S.N.; Kamenskii, M.A.; Volkov, A.I.; Tolstopjatova, E.G.; Glumov, O.V.; Fu, L.; Kondratiev, V.V. Vanadium Oxide-Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) Nanocomposite as High-Performance Cathode for Aqueous Zn-Ion Batteries: The Structural and Electrochemical Characterization. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3896. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213896

AMA Style

Volkov FS, Eliseeva SN, Kamenskii MA, Volkov AI, Tolstopjatova EG, Glumov OV, Fu L, Kondratiev VV. Vanadium Oxide-Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) Nanocomposite as High-Performance Cathode for Aqueous Zn-Ion Batteries: The Structural and Electrochemical Characterization. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(21):3896. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213896

Chicago/Turabian Style

Volkov, Filipp S., Svetlana N. Eliseeva, Mikhail A. Kamenskii, Alexey I. Volkov, Elena G. Tolstopjatova, Oleg V. Glumov, Lijun Fu, and Veniamin V. Kondratiev. 2022. "Vanadium Oxide-Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) Nanocomposite as High-Performance Cathode for Aqueous Zn-Ion Batteries: The Structural and Electrochemical Characterization" Nanomaterials 12, no. 21: 3896. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213896

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop