You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Yanxi Zhao1,2,3,
  • Dengpan Xiao1,2,3,* and
  • Huizi Bai3
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous Reviewer 3: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I have gone through this paper. Just language check would be helpful.

Author Response

Thanks, we appreciated your comments on our manuscript sincerely. And, we have revised our language in the paper.

Reviewer 2 Report

The subject of the study is very interesting and topical, with scientific and practical importance.

The introduction is presented correctly, in accordance with the subject however, it requires some minor additions. Numerous scientific articles, in concordance to the topic of the study, were consulted.

Methodology of the study was clearly presented, and appropriate to the proposed objectives.

The obtained results are important and have been analyzed and interpreted correctly, in accordance with the current methodology.

The discussions are appropriate, in the context of the results, and was conducted compared to other studies in the field.

The scientific literature, to which the reporting was made, is recent and representative in the field.

Author Response

Thanks, we appreciated your comments on our manuscript sincerely. And, we have revised the paper according to your suggestion.

Reviewer 3 Report

Minor revision, file attached with comments

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx