Review Reports
by
- Mostafa Ghadami 1,*,
- Andreas Dittmann 1 and
- Naser Aligholizadeh Firouzjaie 3
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
I accept the changes made to the earlier version of the article.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer
We are grateful again for your corrective feedback and valuable comments.
Sincerely Yours,
Authors
Reviewer 2 Report
Dear author/s,
thank you for the improved version of the manuscript.
Still I recommend you to emphasize which gap in the literature the current research fills.
Good luck!
Author Response
Dear Reviewer
Thank you very much for your new helpful comments, considering your precious comments, we have edited the manuscript and resubmitted it as follows:
- Still, I recommend you to emphasize which gap in the literature the current research fills.
1.1. We tried to address the gap or the contribution of the research in the introduction section (lines 201-205) and the discussion section (lines 709-717).
We are grateful again for your corrective feedback and valuable comments.
Sincerely Yours,
Authors
Reviewer 3 Report
Thank you for your careful revision, but I have the following suggestions, which I hope will be helpful to you.
1. There are still some detail problems with the reference. Why do some sentences have a period, but some sentences don't have a period? For example [8, 11, 12, 32].
2. Regarding the conclusion, I give suggestions in different directions from the perspective of various stakeholders, which will make your conclusion more practical.
Author Response
Dear Reviewers
Thank you very much for your new helpful comments, considering your precious comments, we have edited the manuscript and resubmitted it as follows:
1. There are still some detail problems with the reference. Why do some sentences have a period, but some sentences don't have a period? For example [8, 11, 12, 32].
1.1.The period of all references is edited according to your comment. ( reference section).
2. Regarding the conclusion, I give suggestions in different directions from the perspective of various stakeholders, which will make your conclusion more practical.
2.2. This important point is added to the conclusion section ( lines 779-784).
We are grateful again for your corrective feedback and valuable comments.
Sincerely Yours,
Authors