Skip to Content
  • Article
  • Open Access

27 December 2023

Same Journey, Different Paths: Caregiver Burden among Informal Caregivers of Adolescent and Young Adult Patients with an Uncertain or Poor Cancer Prognosis (UPCP)

,
,
,
,
and
1
Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2
Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3
Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
4
Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

A minority of adolescent and young adult cancer patients (AYA) live with an uncertain or poor prognosis (UPCP). Caring for a young, advanced cancer patient can lead to caregiver burden. This study aims to provide insight into burden on informal caregivers of AYA cancer patients with UPCP. In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted with parents (n = 12), siblings (n = 7), friends (n = 7), and partners (n = 13). Thematic analysis was performed to derive themes from the data. Participants reported sleeping problems and stress. They struggle with uncertainty, fear, loss, and negative emotions. Family life is altered due to solely taking care of the children, but also the AYA. Contact with friends and family is changed. The relationship to the AYA can shift positively (e.g., becoming closer) or negatively (e.g., more conflict or no longer being attracted). Participants were under pressure, having to take on many responsibilities and multiple roles. In the financial domain, they report less income and often must continue working. A high amount of caregiver burden is experienced among informal caregivers of AYAs with UPCP. Yet only part of the impact appears to be age specific. Specific, age-adjusted interventions can be developed to lower the burden.

1. Introduction

Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer are patients diagnosed between the ages of 15 and 39 years [1]. These patients encounter various psychological challenges, as they are diagnosed during a developmental period in their lives during which many alterations occur (for example, starting a family and a career) [2]. The vast majority are diagnosed during a stage at which treatment with curative intent is still possible, albeit often requiring intensive treatments [3]. However, a subgroup of AYA cancer patients lives with an uncertain or poor cancer prognosis (UPCP). Burgers and colleagues defined them as “patients with advanced cancer for which there is no reasonable hope of cure, indicating that they will die prematurely from cancer, but have no immediate threat of death” [3]. These patients can be divided into three groups: patients on newer therapies (immunotherapy, targeted therapy), those on traditional therapies (chemotherapy, radiotherapy), or patients diagnosed with a low-grade glioma (on a wait-and-scan policy after surgery). Due to their uncertain life expectancy, questions regarding the future, remaining treatment options, and the essence of their lives emerge in AYA cancer patients with a UPCP [3].
AYA cancer patients oftentimes become dependent on their informal caregivers, as they frequently face a reduction in autonomy due to disease symptoms and side effects of their treatment [3]. Consequently, taking care of an AYA cancer patient with a UPCP could result in caregiver burden, defined as “the extent to which caregivers perceive that their physical health, psychological health, schedule, social life, and financial status have suffered due to providing care for a cancer patient” [4]. Our recent review shows that informal caregivers of AYA cancer patients experience impact in each of the domains of caregiver burden [5]. Aside from the fact that caring for a patient of AYA-age is already demanding, research shows that taking care of someone with advanced disease could entail an additional burden. A study among informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients stated that having to observe someone’s physical deterioration was difficult and caused them to feel helpless. Uncertainty about the future was perceived as straining among these caregivers. They also reported that providing emotional support was considered more demanding than providing practical help [6].
Informal caregivers of AYA cancer patients are involved in many day-to-day tasks and adopt multiple roles. They provide practical as well as emotional support for the patient. Caregivers oftentimes report negative emotional states related to caretaking and they face age-specific challenges related to the young age of the patient (e.g., an altered future for their partners) [5]. Consequently, the diagnosis and disease trajectory may affect the relationship with their caregivers. Physical and/or emotional intimacy may decrease, or conflicts can arise. These changes in the relationship are often related to the patient’s physical decline and the growing pressure on the caregiver. If communication is perceived as challenging, these negative feelings can intensify, and divergence may occur [7]. In addition, AYA cancer patients with a UPCP report that they are not undergoing similar development to their peers. Moreover, these peers frequently cannot relate to the patient’s circumstances and therefore cannot provide sufficient support [3]. This leads to a high risk for social isolation, which can make a patient more prone to negative physiological responses, such as hypertension [8].
Informal caregivers are an understudied group in AYA literature as the focus is typically on the needs and associated problems of the patients. In addition, caregivers taking care of advanced cancer patients are different from those dealing with curative intent. There is no literature on the wellbeing of caregivers for AYA cancer patients with a UPCP, although they face age- and disease-specific burden as caregivers while coping with the uncertain life expectancy. Creating an understanding of the challenges this group experiences in daily life can help to adequately support them by providing or developing interventions, and information to cope. This might increase their quality of life, both before and, when applicable, after the death of AYA cancer patient. In addition, the wellbeing of the informal caregiver seems to be related to the patients’ health. Since current care initiatives are not tailored to this group of caregivers, it is important to align their impact with the content of these programs. Therefore, this interview study aims to identify the impact on daily life of a caregiver of an AYA cancer patient with a UPCP, using the definition of caregiver burden to determine the impact.

2. Materials and Methods

The Consolidation Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies guideline was followed to guarantee quality and transparency of reporting [9].

2.1. Sample and Procedure

A qualitative, descriptive study was performed to examine the impact of cancer and the prognosis on caregivers of AYA cancer patients with a UPCP. Informal caregivers were defined as “the individuals that you would turn to for help in making decisions and depend on to be with you when getting your cancer care”. Caregivers were invited to participate by an AYA who participated in the INVAYA-study or via word-of-mouth. Patients were asked during their interview to invite one or more of their informal caregivers to participate and had 1–2 weeks to nominate them. The patient received information via e-mail regarding the caregiver part of the study. During the patients’ follow-up call, they were asked for consent to contact their informal caregiver(s) and to receive the caregivers’ contact information. AYAs were also able to indicate their preference on how to approach the caregivers (via telephone or e-mail). Caregivers were contacted by the researcher, provided with information, consent was gathered, and a date for the interview was set. Caregivers had to be able to speak and understand the Dutch language. Semistructured interviews were conducted among these informal caregivers of the AYA cancer patients, stratified into four groups (parents, partners, friends, and siblings) until an equal distribution of the type of caregivers was reached. An effort was made to interview as many different types of caregivers as possible. Since partners and parents are the ones exhibiting the most prominent role in the care of these patients, they were represented more frequently in the sample.
Participants were asked open-ended questions regarding the impact on their daily lives, their relationship to the patient, and their support preferences (Table A1). The interview guide was derived from the interviews conducted with AYA cancer patients and adapted to specify the impact on caregivers. Five AYA research partners were subsequently asked what they would like to know from their informal caregivers. This input was transformed into questions and added to the guide. Prior to the interview, the caregiver completed a case report form (CRF), answering questions on their age, living situation, employment status, educational level, and work status. In total, 36 interviews were conducted, which ranged between 36 and 112 min (mean duration: 59 min). All interviews took place via Microsoft Teams due to COVID-19 restrictions. One to two weeks after the interview, caregivers had a follow-up call to evaluate the interview and were allowed to share information they had forgotten. These interviews were part of the INVAYA-study, which was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands (IRBd20-205). The INVAYA-study focused on AYA cancer patients coping with a UPCP, their caregivers, and health-care professionals [10].

2.2. Data Analysis

In-depth interviews were conducted by a female psychologist and researcher (V.B.), a female researcher (C.V.), and a female research assistant (E.D.), and were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. A second researcher (M.R.) analyzed the interviews using QSR NVIVO [11]. The analysis was based on the bottom-up thematic analysis from Braun and Clarke [12]. First, all interviews were reviewed twice, after which all textual information describing any type of impact was highlighted (open coding). The codes gathered from the data were divided among the different categories of caregiver burden: biological, psychological, social, schedule, or financial (Table A2). Four independent researchers then examined which of the codes were considered AYA-specific and which applied to caregivers of an AYA cancer patient with a UPCP in particular until they reached consensus. A subsequent analysis of these codes was conducted to discover overarching themes (axial coding). Descriptive statistics were used to determine the sociodemographic data, which was performed using SPSS version 26.0.

3. Results

Forty-two caregivers were nominated by AYA cancer patients. In total, 39 caregivers were interviewed. The remaining three caregivers eventually opted out before their interview. Three interviews were conducted with both parents attending, resulting in thirty-six interviews in total. These included 13 partners, 12 parents, 7 friends, and 7 siblings. Table 1 presents the characteristics of the participants. Quotes supporting the data are presented in Table A3.
Table 1. Sociodemographic information of caregivers of AYA cancer patients with a UPCP.

3.1. Biological Impact

Caregivers reported that they experienced reduced energy. This was mainly due to sleeping problems, partly due to worrying about the patient or tasks that must be accomplished (e.g., maintaining the medication schedule). Some caregivers also mentioned that they were on sick-leave and had difficulty concentrating. Stress had a significant impact and led to being less able to handle crowds and occasional panic attacks. Stress also led to physical symptoms. For example, a sister reported having to go to her general practitioner for chest pain, and a partners’ psoriasis exacerbated. Also, changes in lifestyle tended to occur. A mother mentioned that she had reduced time and ability to properly care for herself and to be physically active. Aside from that, caregivers reported that it was more difficult to be active, as the patient was not able to perform many physical activities. One caregiver reported that she was not attracted to her partner anymore. This was partly because he had changed from a young, active person to a frail man with an altered appearance. This partner did not mention this to the patient, in order not to hurt him. This also impacted their sexual relationship, as the caregiver reported a decreased interest in sex (1.1). This issue is multifaceted, as it is both psychological and social in nature.

3.2. Psychological Impact

The informal caregivers reported fear of the patient’s declining health status, the end-of-life phase, death and being left alone. It was confronting for them to be engaged in conversations regarding death and to prepare for it (e.g., writing the will). Also, being in support groups with others in a similar situation was burdensome for some of them. For parents, having to take care of their sick adult children was confronting and felt unfair (2.1). Uncertainty related to prognosis, upcoming disease progression and life expectancy oftentimes occurred. Furthermore, having to wait a long time for scans and the results, and not knowing how to best fulfill their lives (2.2) had a big impact on caregivers. Due to the patient’s illness, caregivers became more aware of their own mortality.
Negative emotions were evoked because of caregiving. Informal caregivers reported guilt toward the patient because the disease had such an impact on their lives and had difficulty balancing and respecting the patients’ independence when taking care of them. They worried greatly about the patient, but also tried not to burden them. Caregivers of patients with brain tumors coped with the frustration of navigating the patient’s cognitive impairment. Patients also tended to share less information than caregivers preferred, which also led to frustration. Caregivers reported their lives being put on hold and fully devoting themselves to the patient, while ignoring their own needs (2.3). Parents and a sister mentioned not being able to enjoy their lives as much as they had before the cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, many caregivers felt that they were not able to accept the disease and its prognosis. Caregivers reported high levels of hopelessness, as they were unable to support the patient’s need to manage their psychological symptoms, to prevent or mitigate physical decline, and felt unable to adequately provide help during an emergency, in juxtaposition to their commitment to provide the best care possible. Caregivers were also burdened by the idea of the patient being unable to go through all the phases of life.
Caregivers reported an impact on their family life. They identified difficulty with being left alone with children when the partner dies. Caregivers struggled with the fact that their children would be growing up with only one parent, or that the child would be too young to remember the patient as their parent later in life. Partners were also afraid of falling ill themselves and leaving their children orphaned. Caregivers were burdened by the knowledge that their young children were aware of and sad about the disease, and they feared the children would not be able to deal with the death of their parent (2.4). Moreover, caregivers were occupied with not burdening their children with the disease and its impact. Furthermore, a major impact was seen on the ability to start or enlarge one’s family. For many partners, it was difficult that the possibility of having children had been taken away, but also that no fertility preservation had occurred prior to treatment (2.5). It was also challenging for them to talk about fertility at such a young age. Friends and siblings reported feeling that the patient was not able to enjoy being with their children, or that they were not able to tell the AYA that they wanted to start a family because it felt inappropriate and burdensome.
Loss was described in various ways. Caregivers mentioned that they felt too young to be in this situation and that their future would change due to the disease. Siblings perceived difficulty with being left as the only child once the patient has died. Partners worried they would never find a new partner that would meet their needs and/or accept their situation. Furthermore, caregivers found it challenging that they were not to be able to do as much as their peers. It was burdensome to them when the patient was not able to accept their disease.

3.3. Social Impact

Caregivers reported difficulties in contacting others (3.1). It was difficult for them to realize they often cannot relate to others in support groups, as some of these patients and their caregivers were already going into the end-of-life phase. Moreover, caregivers tended not to talk to others about the disease, to avoid being a burden to them. They found it difficult to explain to their young children what is happening and what would happen in the future. Often, partners and AYAs had to discuss together what they wanted to share with their children or did not talk about the disease in their children’s presence. Sometimes caregivers felt like they only received pity in their contact with others, even though they wanted to be approached normally. Sometimes they isolated from others to reduce the risk in infecting the patient, as this study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Subsequently, others often also did not want to talk about the disease (for example, with their children), were happier with the scan results than patient and caregivers, or did not talk about their own lives to unburden them. Furthermore, caregivers experienced unsolicited relationship advice from those who tended to interfere, as they did not want the caregiver to experience the pain of losing someone.
Friends were an important source of support. However, it was more difficult for caregivers to meet their friends regularly, as they had less leisure time. Caregivers sometimes quit their hobbies to fully devote themselves to caregiving, resulting in less time for themselves. In addition, they experienced that their friends had difficulty relating and empathizing to the situation, oftentimes due to their relatively young age and lack of familiarity with similar situations. They could not compare themselves to other AYAs on curative treatment and their caregivers or to older patients with a similar prognosis (3.2). Caregivers reported that support decreased through time since the diagnosis was longer (3.3).
Caregivers had to make many adjustments in their relationship to the AYA. For instance, they had to adapt to when the patient wanted to talk about the disease and felt burdened in addressing it. They also did not want to strain the patient with discussions about difficult topics. It was challenging for them to empathize with the AYA’s situation, and they perceived that they were experiencing a different trajectory (3.4). The disparate impact on their own life also made caregivers want to hear different information regarding the prognosis. They were less likely to cancel the plans with the AYA due to the limited time they have left together. Caregivers mentioned that asking how they and the patient are doing was often seen as adequate support: e.g., “just reach out”. They mentioned that being able to talk about what they are dealing with, as well as doing fun activities with friends as a distraction, was helpful. They also obtained support from others who were in a similar situation. Caregivers working in a medical environment mentioned that sharing their experiences with individuals with medical knowledge was often easier for them to share their experiences.

3.4. Schedule Impact

Caregivers performed various caregiving tasks, which they undertook in addition to their own daily life activities (e.g., employment, their family, household). They often accompanied the patient to appointments, both as transportation and to support them for the conversation with the treating physician. Prior to the consult, they helped to structure what questions they had, and made sure these were answered. Caregivers often completely took over household tasks, as the patient often had little energy or wanted to spend their time and energy differently. Caregivers planned out the days and made sure the patient maintained their medication schedule. In addition, they tried to distract the patient by bringing them along and engaging in various activities.
Difficulties in taking on multiple roles were also reported. Being both a partner and a caregiver was considered challenging. Additionally, the combination of being employed and taking on caregiving tasks appeared to be a significant burden. The impact on the caregivers’ family life sometimes changed due to the disease. Partners of AYA cancer patients often were their children’s sole caregiver. In some cases, both the patient and children must be cared for by the informal caregiver. Others (e.g., parents or siblings) frequently took on a larger role in the care of the patient’s children. Consequently, their own daily life or work situation had to be adjusted.
There were sacrifices to support the AYA cancer patient. Their own plans were often cancelled in order to stay with or take care of the patient, and making plans for the future was no longer possible (4.1) due to the uncertainties associated with the disease and the patient’s unpredictable physical condition. Traveling, in general, was cancelled to stay close in case the AYA needed medical assistance. An AYA and partner decided not to emigrate because of cancer. This also complicated engaging in spontaneous activities. Sometimes caregivers had to (temporarily) stop working or move in with the patient to assist with caretaking. Their personal time was sacrificed as a result (4.2).
Other changes related to the future involved earlier marriage, so that decision-making would become easier (4.3). Some female caregivers indicated they wanted to become pregnant more quickly to be more certain that the patient would still be alive long enough to meet the child. One partner indicated they did not start new education because it was not possible to combine it with caregiving. Study delay also occurred because caregiving led to reduced time to focus on their studies. Some caregivers reported bringing their wedding forward so that the AYA could be present and they could celebrate this milestone together. In addition, caregivers with medical knowledge stepped in to navigate healthcare and conversations with the medical team. Caregivers tried to prepare for their changed future, as after death the patient’s would be the sole caretaker of their children (4.4).

3.5. Financial Impact

Caregivers worried about reduced income, as most patients were no longer able to stay employed and their benefit oftentimes did not cover the loss of their salary. Managing on one income was perceived as challenging by caregivers (5.1) and resulted in anxiety and stress. Due to the decrease in combined income, for some there was little room to engage in recreational activities. Caregivers occasionally needed to find a different job to guarantee enough income and cover the loss of financial resources. Applying for benefits turned out to be difficult and burdensome. Caregivers would prefer to spend less time in employment and more time on activities they enjoy doing or staying with the patient in their remaining time (5.2) but were often not able to arrange this financially.
As both the patient and caregiver, due to their young age, have often not accumulated as many resources in terms of financial security, the financial impact was great and motivated decision-making. In some cases, this led to the decision to marry to make financial decisions easier. They also experienced that obtaining a mortgage was more difficult or impossible, which in some cases meant that people had to rent and were not able to buy a house (5.3). In some cases, caregivers had to sell their house as the mortgage had become too expensive given their reduced income.

4. Discussion

This qualitative, explorative study aimed to identify age-specific impact on caregivers of AYA cancer patients managing a UPCP. The impact on these caregivers was present in all domains of caregiver burden: biological, psychological, social, scheduling, and financial. Some of the burdens might be interpreted as age-specific, such as the inability to start or extend a family and the anticipated grief in having to care for the family alone after death. Also, the lack of understanding from peers and the (permanent) change in the future of caregivers are also more profound among the interviewees, which may have a different impact in comparison to those taking care of pediatric or older patients. In addition, the young patients and their partners might have comparatively few financial resources and, consequently, the impact on their assets can be high. However, most of the challenges described by the informal caregivers were not interpreted to be AYA-specific, nor specifically related to cancer. The firm impression of the authors is that the impact on psychological and schedule domain was greater than in the other domains and age-ranges. However, this is not quantitatively examined.
In line with our results, Junkins and colleagues report that caregivers of AYA cancer patients do not only exclusively experience challenges that are related to the specific age of these relatively young patients [13]. Caregivers of AYA cancer patients also dealt with some of the same problems as other caregivers do (for example, changes in intimacy, which also occurs in older adult dyads) and, in addition, the caregivers report universal experiences (e.g., impact on financial situation, changes in relationships to others, and need for additional support) [13]. Caregiver burden is also dependent on patient and caregiver related factors. The literature shows that factors that are associated with increased caregiver burden include lower educational level of both caregiver and patient, employment and income, low social support, comorbidities of the patient [14], treatment period and type, psychological symptoms [15], caregiver age [16], gender, and the amount of time spent caregiving [17]. Also, nonwhite caregivers tend to report more caregiver burden [18]. Due to the qualitative nature of this study, there was no opportunity to examine this aspect.
Several caregivers reported the need for a preplanned psychosocial track, as the psychological burden is substantial. Here, focus can be placed on fears and negative feelings that arise from caregiving for a young patient with a poor cancer prognosis. These negative feelings are also mentioned among other informal caregivers of AYAs [19,20,21,22]. Psychological consultations (one-on-one) during palliative trajectories can reduce stress and improve coping and communication with the patient [23,24]. AYAs and caregivers in this study indicated that talking to one another about the situation is perceived as therapeutic. This opens a mandatory conversation and addresses topics that may not usually be appointed, as this is difficult for informal caregivers to initiate [25,26]. An intervention opportunity would therefore be to have a session (at least once) with their healthcare professional (HCP), partner, and AYA to discuss age-specific topics or receive more information, aside from the normative consultations. Regarding schedule impact, it is difficult to create room and opportunities for caregiving without having to combine it with multiple other roles in daily life. However, caregiver training and skill development interventions might assist caregivers in growing into the caregiver role. Psychoeducational interventions can also help caregivers to adjust to their role and feel confident and self-efficacy when performing tasks [27,28].
Current AYA-care in the Netherlands could be complemented with care for these caregivers, considering that this study clearly shows that the burden on this group is profound, with negative impact on the patient’s and caregiver’s wellbeing. Given that challenges are not always age specific, aspects and interventions that decrease caregiver burden in the general population could also be implemented within caregivers of AYA with a UPCP. Social support can be an important component, together with teaching adaptive coping strategies. In the literature, this had a positive effect on the caregivers’ emotional and physical wellbeing [29]. The use of social media can help them to find similar experiences and seek support from others in a similar situation and is used often in this young population. Digital interventions can help to achieve adequate communication with each other and improve decision-making [30]. However, for some of the caregiver burden described in this article, there does not yet seem to be a ready-made solution. Experiencing a changed future and not reaching milestones (raising a family, buying a house) cannot be solved and will continue to be a frequently reported matter of fact among (mainly) partners.
This paper is the first to present how caregivers of AYA cancer patients managing a UPCP experience the impact of the disease on their daily life, and describes the perceived caregiver burden among this group. Moreover, for a qualitative study, the sample size was relatively large, resulting in different types of caregivers providing in-depth information on the impact on their life. Aside from the strengths of this study, there are also limitations. Social desirability could have occurred because caregivers are concerned that patients would be able to read the results of the study. Qualitative research is susceptible to interpretation by researchers, indicating that certain outcomes may have been interpreted differently than the interviewee intended. Also, due to the qualitative nature of the study, it is more difficult to generalize the results, and no factors associated with caregiver burden could be determined. Hence, what the emphasis should be when providing support cannot be properly examined. The results of this study cannot be generalized, as limited caregivers with a migration background participated and the educational level of the participants was high. Also, the sample that was interviewed shapes the results and therefore may provide a bias. Depending on their problem, results are presented. A different sample may lead to different results, for example, if their patient is doing worse or when informal caregivers coping with other tumor types are included.

5. Conclusions

Caregivers of AYA cancer patients with a UPCP experience burden in multiple domains of daily life. The burden is extensive and the issues mentioned can be included in follow-up research, identifying which issues require specific interventions. HCP can be encouraged to properly refer these caregivers for appropriate psychological support or to organizations to give practical support. It may lead to fruitful conversations, encourage their informal caregivers to seek additional help or motivate the AYA patient to seek further support to unburden caregivers. By supporting caregivers, their burden can be reduced and their quality of life improved. This can enable caregivers to provide better care of the patient, which also might enhance the patient’s quality of life.

Author Contributions

O.H. and W.T.A.v.d.G. conceptualized the study and acquired funding. V.W.G.B., W.T.A.v.d.G. and O.H. developed the methodology. V.W.G.B. and W.T.A.v.d.G. contributed to patient recruitment. V.W.G.B. and C.V. performed the interviews. M.J.P.R., O.H. and W.T.A.v.d.G. were involved in analysis discussions. The original draft was prepared by M.J.P.R., W.T.A.v.d.G. and O.H. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

O.H. is supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (grant number VIDI198.007).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Institutional Review Board of The Netherlands Cancer Institute (IRBd20-205) for studies involving humans.

Data Availability Statement

Data will not be made available due to privacy reasons of the participants.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Esther Derksen (ED) for her help in conducting the interviews. The authors would like to thank the research partners for their help in establishing the study and finalizing the guide.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Interview guide.
Table A2. All codes derived from interviews with caregivers of AYA cancer patients with UPCP.
Table A3. Quotes derived from the interviews.

References

  1. Ferrari, A.; Stark, D.; Peccatori, F.A.; Fern, L.; Laurence, V.; Gaspar, N.; Bozovic-Spasojevic, I.; Smith, O.; De Munter, J.; Derwich, K.; et al. Adolescent and young adults (AYA) with cancer: A position paper from the AYA Working Group of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE). ESMO Open 2021, 6, 100096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  2. Richter, D.; Koehler, M.; Friedrich, M.; Hilgendorf, I.; Mehnert, A.; Weissflog, G. Psychosocial interventions for adolescent and young adult cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Rev. Oncol. 2015, 95, 370–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Burgers, V.W.G.; van der Graaf, W.T.A.; van der Meer, D.J.; McGabe, M.G.; Rijneveld, A.W.; van den Bent, M.J.; Husson, O. Adolescents and Young Adult Living with an Uncertain or Poor Cancer Prognosis: The “New” Lost Tribe. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2021, 19, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Thana, K.; Lehto, R.; Sikorskii, A.; Wyatt, G. Informal caregiver burden for solid tumour cancer patients: A review and future directions. Psychol. Health 2021, 36, 1514–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Reuvers, M.J.P.; Gedik, A.; Way, K.M.; Elbersen-van de Stadt, S.; van der Graaf, W.T.A.; Husson, O. Caring for Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) with Cancer: A Scoping Review into Caregiver Burdens and Needs. Cancers 2023, 15, 3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  6. Mosher, C.E.; Adams, R.N.; Helft, P.R.; O’Neil, B.H.; Shahda, S.; Rattray, N.A.; Champion, V.L. Family caregiving challenges in advanced colorectal cancer: Patient and caregiver perspectives. Support. Care Cancer 2015, 24, 2017–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  7. Badr, H.; Bakhshaie, J.; Chhabria, K. Dyadic Interventions for Cancer Survivors and Caregivers: State of the Science and New Directions. Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 2019, 35, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Docherty, S.L.; Kayle, M.; Maslow, G.R.; Santacroce, S.J. The Adolescent and Young Adult with Cancer: A Developmental Life Course Perspective. Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 2015, 31, 186–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Tong, A.; Sainsbury, P.; Craig, J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2007, 19, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Burgers, V.W.G.; van den Bent, M.J.; Dirven, L.; Lalisang, R.I.; Tromp, J.M.; Compter, A.; Kouwenhoven, M.; Bos, M.E.M.M.; de Langen, A.; Reuvers, M.J.P.; et al. “Finding my way in a maze while the clock is ticking”: The daily life challenges of adolescents and young adults with an uncertain or poor cancer prognosis. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 994934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo. 2022. Available online: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home (accessed on 2 May 2023).
  12. Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Junkins, C.C.; Kent, E.; Litzelman, K.; Bevans, M.; Cannady, R.S.; Rosenberg, A.R. Cancer across the ages: A narrative review of caregiver burden for patients of all ages. J. Psychosoc. Oncol. 2020, 38, 783–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Adib-Hajbaghery, M.; Ahmadi, B. Caregiver Burden and Its Associated Factors in Caregivers of Children and Adolescents with Chronic Conditions. Int. J. Community Based Nurs. Midwifery 2019, 7, 258–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Koyu, H.O.; Arslan, F.T. The effect of physical and psychosocial symptoms on caregiver burden of parents of children with cancer. Eur. J. Cancer Care 2021, 30, e13513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Hoellen, F.; Wagner, J.F.; Lüdders, D.W.; Rody, A.; Banz-Jansen, C. Anxiety in caregiving partners of breast cancer patients. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2019, 300, 993–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Unsar, S.; Erol, O.; Ozdemir, O. Caregiving burden, depression and anxiety in family caregivers of patients with cancer. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2021, 50, 10882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. Ge, L.; Mordiffi, S.Z. Factors Associated with Higher Caregiver Burden Among Family Caregivers of Elderly Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. Cancer Nurs. 2017, 40, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Baum, L.V.; Koyama, T.; Schremp, E.A.; Zhang, K.; Rodweller, C.A.; Roth, M.C.; Compas, B.E.; Friedman, D.L. Posttraumatic stress symptoms and financial toxicity among adolescent and young adult oncology patients and their caregivers at cancer diagnosis. Cancer 2022, 128, 2005–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Borstelmann, N.A.; Rosenberg, S.; Gelber, S.; Zheng, Y.; Meyer, M.; Ruddy, K.J.; Schapira, L.; Come, S.; Borges, V.; Cadet, T.; et al. Partners of young breast cancer survivors: A cross-sectional evaluation of psychosocial concerns, coping, and mental health. J. Psychosoc. Oncol. 2020, 38, 670–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Mishra, S.I.; Brakey, H.R.; Kano, M.; Nedjat-Haiem, F.R.; Sussman, A.L. Health related quality of life during cancer treatment: Perspectives of young adult (23–39 years) cancer survivors and primary informal caregivers. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2018, 32, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Schweitzer, R.; Griffiths, M.; Yates, P. Parental experience of childhood cancer using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Psychol. Health 2012, 27, 704–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Stevens, M.C.; Beynon, P.; Cameron, A.; Cargill, J.; Cheshire, J.; Dolby, S.; Psychol, C. Understanding and Utilizing the Unmet Needs of Teenagers and Young Adults with Cancer to Determine Priorities for Service Development: The Macmillan on Target Programme. J. Adolesc. Young-Adult Oncol. 2018, 7, 652–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Treanor, C.J. Psychosocial support interventions for cancer caregivers: Reducing caregiver burden. Curr. Opin. Support. Palliat. 2020, 14, 247–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Grinyer, A. Caring for a young adult with cancer: The impact on mothers’ health. Health Soc. Care Community 2006, 14, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Bogetz, J.; Trowbridge, A.; Kingsley, J.; Taylor, M.; Wiener, L.; Rosenberg, A.R.; Barton, K.S. Stuck Moments and Silver-Linings: The Spectrum of Adaptation Among Non-Bereaved and Bereaved Parents of Adolescents and Young Adults with Advanced Cancer. J. Pain Symptom. Manag. 2021, 62, 709–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  27. Jadalla, A.; Page, M.; Ginex, P.; Coleman, M.; Vrabel, M.; Bevans, M. Family Caregiver Strain and Burden: A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Interventions When Caring for Patients with Cancer. Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2020, 24, 31–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Cohen, M.; Kuten, A. Cognitive–behavior group intervention for relatives of cancer patients: A controlled study. J. Psychosom. Res. 2006, 61, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Guerra-Martin, M.D.; Del Rocio Casado-Espinosa, M.; Gavira-Lopez, Y.; Holgado-Castro, C.; Lopez-Latorre, I.; Borrallo-Riego, A. Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Badr, H.; Carmack, C.L.; Diefenbach, M.A. Psychosocial Interventions for Patients and Caregivers in the Age of New Communication Technologies: Opportunities and Challenges in Cancer Care. J. Health Commun. 2015, 20, 328–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.