Next Article in Journal
Regulation of GABAA Receptors Induced by the Activation of L-Type Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels
Next Article in Special Issue
Graphene/Fe3O4 Nanocomposite as a Promising Material for Chemical Current Sources: A Theoretical Study
Previous Article in Journal
Mesenchymal Stem Cells Do Not Lose Direct Labels Including Iron Oxide Nanoparticles and DFO-89Zr Chelates through Secretion of Extracellular Vesicles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Characterization of a Novel Sulfonated Titanium Oxide Incorporated Chitosan Nanocomposite Membranes for Fuel Cell Application
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Membranes
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/membranes11070483
Review Report
membranes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Lamellar Polypyrene Based on Attapulgite–Sulfur Composite for Lithium–Sulfur Battery

Membranes 2021, 11(7), 483; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11070483
by Jing Wang 1,*, Riwei Xu 1, Chengzhong Wang 1 and Jinping Xiong 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Membranes 2021, 11(7), 483; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11070483
Submission received: 28 May 2021 / Revised: 19 June 2021 / Accepted: 24 June 2021 / Published: 29 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flexible Membranes for Batteries and Supercapacitor Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

After careful evaluation of the manuscript, I recommend for major revision before publication in Membranes journal. The reason for major revision is as follows.

Comments:

  • The authors used PPY as the abbreviation for the polypyrene which is not correct as PPy refers to polypyrrole.
  • Why the relative sulfur adsorption is higher at 400 C compared to the other temperature need to be discussed.
  • The bands in the FT-IR need to be denoted in the revised manuscript.
  • Why the rate capability of the device shows linear degradation in the specific capacity during initial cycles compared to the PPy-S device.
  • Physicochemical characterization such as XRD, Raman can provide more insight regarding the prepared materials. Hence author need to provide in the revised manuscript.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, 

Thanks for all youe suggestions and please see the attachment.

Best wishes!

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Review comments on Membranes,

Manuscript Number: membranes-1257870

Manuscript title: Lamellar Polypyrene Based on Attapulgite–Sulfur Composite 2 for Lithium-Sulfur Battery

The novelty of the work is very good. The present manuscript should be accepted after a major revisions following the comments:

  1. If possible, need to add the XRD data of the composite systems.
  2. Both the equations of calculation of CV and CD are need to show with proper reference.
  3. The manuscript needs to check the English editing for improvement of English.
  4. Use the proper refernces related this work such as https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA18811G, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.01.023

Author Response

Dear reviewer, 

Thanks for all youe suggestion and please see the attachment.

Best wishes!

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop