Next Article in Journal
Measuring the Positions of the Solder Pins of Electrical Connectors from the Side
Next Article in Special Issue
A Random Sampling-Based Method via Gaussian Process for Motion Planning in Dynamic Environments
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Text Pre-Processing in Sentiment Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
UV3D: Underwater Video Stream 3D Reconstruction Based on Efficient Global SFM
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Research on the Visual Guidance System of Zoning Casting Grinding Based on Feature Points

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(17), 8771; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178771
by Minjian Zhu 1,2, Tao Shang 1,2,3, Zelin Jin 1,2, Chunshan Liu 1, Wenbin Deng 2 and Yanli Chen 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(17), 8771; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178771
Submission received: 22 July 2022 / Revised: 9 August 2022 / Accepted: 27 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence Techniques and Robotic Control Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. Figure 2 looks complicated. Enlarge Figure 2 for matching between names and each area.

2. The Zhengyou Zhang calibration method needs a little explanation. Provide a reference with a brief explanation.

3. What part of equation (2) is the compensation equation of the small-aperture model?

4. In relation to the point cloud preprocessing, three methods have been described as shown in Figure 6(a,b,c). Which method do you think is the best for point cloud preprocessing?

5. Most of Figures 1-15 are explained, but there is no information about which method is superior or which method was used.

6. The results for Figures 16 and 17 were also not clearly presented.

7. What do flash and riser mean and which method is more effective?

8. As a result, what are the benefits of the automated process? Is it faster than the existing method? Or is it precise? 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors, thank you for your interesting manuscript. I have put my comments and questions in the attached Word document. Best regards

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the  attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The author answered most of my comments. Therefore, I can accept this manuscript  now. Thanks.

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors,

Thank you for correcting the text and adding more information where needed. The manuscript is significantly improved, and you have done it swiftly, thank you.

Best wishes

 

Back to TopTop