Hydraulic Performance of Multi-Phase Extraction Wells: From Laboratory Analysis to Field Validation
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Laboratory Bench Tests
2.2. Material Characterisation and Experimental Parameters
- 1.
- Packing Density: The media were packed at densities ranging from 60% to 90% of the maximum dry density to identify the critical threshold at which pore-throat constriction becomes irreversible;
- 2.
- Fluid Viscosity: To simulate the transport of multi-phase fluids and petroleum hydrocarbons (NAPLs), the viscosity of the permeant was adjusted between 0.5 and 2.0 mPa·s. This allowed for the evaluation of how increased fluid-drag forces influence the retention of fine particles within the filter pack.
2.3. Field Pilot Setup
- A-type Wells (Innovative): These wells utilised the optimised rounded quartz sand filter pack, which laboratory tests identified as the most resilient against clogging.
- R-type Wells (Conventional Control): These wells were constructed using standard local yellow sand with a single-layer filter structure, representing the current industry standard for the site region.
2.4. Mathematical Indicators of Hydraulic Recovery
- is the cumulative recovery rate at time ;
- is the liquid level (head) measured at time (m);
- is the minimum liquid level reached at the point of maximum drawdown (m);
- is the initial static liquid level before extraction commenced (m).
- is the specific cumulative recovery rate at time ();
- is the cumulative recovery rate at time ;
- is the total elapsed time at the i-th measurement (s);
- is the time duration at which the minimum liquid level () was achieved (s).
3. Laboratory Insights into Clogging Mechanisms
3.1. Material Influence on Permeability Evolution
3.2. Packing Density and the Critical 70% Threshold
3.3. Impact of Fluid Viscosity on Clogging Kinetics
4. Field Performance Evaluation
4.1. Analysis of Hydraulic Performance: Large Diameter Wells A1 and R1
4.2. Analysis of Hydraulic Performance: Small Diameter Wells A2 and R2
5. Remediation of Clogged Wells
5.1. Physical Maintenance: High-Pressure Jetting Efficacy
5.2. Chemical Maintenance: Targeted Acid Washing Efficacy
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Majeed, B.K.; Shwan, D.M.; Rashid, K.A. A review on environmental contamination of petroleum hydrocarbons, its effects and remediation approaches. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2025, 27, 526–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Yu, J.R.; Zhou, C.; Mu, Q.Y. Numerical investigation on light non-aqueous phase liquid flow in the vadose zone considering porosity effects on soil hydraulic properties. Vadose Zone J. 2022, 21, e20211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shiau, B.B.; Brammer, J.M.; Sabatini, D.A.; Harwell, J.H.; Knox, R.C. Recent development of low concentration surfactant flushing for NAPL-impacted site remediation and pollution prevention. In Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water/Prevention, Assessment, and Remediation Twentieth Annual Conference and Exposition; NGWA: Costa Mesa, CA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Qi, S.; Luo, J.; O’Connor, D.; Wang, Y.; Hou, D. A numerical model to optimize LNAPL remediation by multi-phase extraction. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 718, 137309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wen, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Krause, S.; Chen, W. Advancing multi-phase LNAPL extraction models by incorporating a wellbore module. Water Resour. Res. 2025, 61, e2025WR041014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rayner, J.L.; Bekele, E.; Donn, M.; Bastow, T.; Davis, G.B.; Woodbury, R.; Geste, Y. Australian case studies of light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) natural source zone depletion rates compared with conventional active recovery efforts. In 47, CRC for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment; crcCARE: Newcastle, Australia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, A.R.; Stotler, R.L.; Macpherson, G.L.; Liu, G. Laboratory study of low-flow rates on clogging processes for application to small-diameter injection wells. Water Resour. Manag. 2015, 29, 5171–5184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rinck-Pfeiffer, S.; Ragusa, S.; Sztajnbok, P.; Vandevelde, T. Interrelationships between biological, chemical, and physical processes as an analog to clogging in aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) wells. Water Res. 2000, 34, 2110–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Polak, K.; Górecki, K.; Kaznowska-Opala, K. The dynamics of water wells efficiency reduction and ageing process compensation. Water 2019, 11, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Polak, K.; Kaznowska-Opala, K. The impact of water wells efficiency on hydrogeological parameters assessment and defect identification. Water 2025, 17, 3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, X.; Yue, G.; Huang, J.O. Experimental study of the microscopic visualization of gas clogging during groundwater recharge. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zou, Z.; Shu, L.; Min, X.; Mabedi, E.C. Clogging of infiltration basin and its impact on suspended particles transport in unconfined sand aquifer: Insights from a laboratory study. Water 2019, 11, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Du, X.; Fang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Hou, J.; Ye, X. The prediction methods for potential suspended solids clogging types during managed aquifer recharge. Water 2014, 6, 961–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ma, S.; Song, Y.; Ye, X.; Du, X.; Ma, J. Clogging and water quality change effects of typical metal pollutants under intermittent managed aquifer recharge using urban stormwater. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 13272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wang, H.; Wu, J.; Yang, D.; Chen, Y.; Xia, Y. The fate and clogging mechanisms of suspended particles in natural biofilm-coated porous media. Water 2025, 17, 1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cao, S.C.; Cao, M.; Yuan, Y.; Jung, J.; Li, X. Experimental and numerical investigation of fines migration mechanisms in porous media: Implications for marine gas hydrate production. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kang, S.; Fei, L.; Yang, Z.; Zhao, P.; Wang, Q.; Fan, Q.; Liu, L. Effects of muddy water infiltration on the hydraulic conductivity of soils. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Andrés-Valeri, V.C.; Marchioni, M.; Sañudo-Fontaneda, L.A.; Giustozzi, F.; Becciu, G. Laboratory assessment of the infiltration capacity reduction in clogged porous mixture surfaces. Sustainability 2016, 8, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Maliva, R.G. Clogging. In Anthropogenic Aquifer Recharge: WSP Methods in Water Resources Evaluation Series No. 5; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 307–342. [Google Scholar]
- Indraratna, B.; Medawela, S.K.; Athuraliya, S.; Heitor, A.; Baral, P. Chemical clogging of granular media under acidic groundwater conditions. Environ. Geotech. 2022, 9, 450–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jeong, H.Y.; Jun, S.C.; Cheon, J.Y.; Park, M. A review on clogging mechanisms and managements in aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) applications. Geosci. J. 2018, 22, 667–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yoshitaka, N.; Makoto, N. Clogging mechanisms and preventive measures in artificial recharge systems. J. Groundw. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 181–201. [Google Scholar]
- Hvorslev, M.J. Time Lag and Soil Permeability in Ground-Water Observations; Waterways Experiment Station Bulletin 36; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Vicksburg, MS, USA, 1951.
- Batu, V. Aquifer Hydraulics: A Comprehensive Guide to Hydrogeologic Data Analysis; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]










| Filter Material Type | Particle Distribution | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <1 mm | 1~3 mm | Greater Than 3 mm | ||
| zeolite | <1% | 31% | 69% | The surface is rough, predominantly composed of coarse and fine particles. |
| yellow sand | 32% | 46% | 22% | The surface is moderately rough, with particles of all sizes distributed. |
| quartz sand | 6% | 86% | 8% | Smooth surface with uniform particle size |
| Well ID | Well Depth (m) | Well Diameter (mm) | Filter Material | Filter Structure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 12 | 200 | quartz sand | Single/multi-layer filter pack |
| R1 | yellow sand | Single/multi-layer filter pack | ||
| A2 | 12 | 63 | quartz sand | Single/multi-layer filter pack |
| R2 | yellow ground | Single/multi-layer filter pack |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Shen, T.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, Y.; Cai, J.; Zhang, G.; Shen, C. Hydraulic Performance of Multi-Phase Extraction Wells: From Laboratory Analysis to Field Validation. Environments 2026, 13, 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13050268
Shen T, Zhang Y, Liang Y, Cai J, Zhang G, Shen C. Hydraulic Performance of Multi-Phase Extraction Wells: From Laboratory Analysis to Field Validation. Environments. 2026; 13(5):268. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13050268
Chicago/Turabian StyleShen, Tingting, Yunhui Zhang, Ying Liang, Jiao Cai, Gang Zhang, and Chao Shen. 2026. "Hydraulic Performance of Multi-Phase Extraction Wells: From Laboratory Analysis to Field Validation" Environments 13, no. 5: 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13050268
APA StyleShen, T., Zhang, Y., Liang, Y., Cai, J., Zhang, G., & Shen, C. (2026). Hydraulic Performance of Multi-Phase Extraction Wells: From Laboratory Analysis to Field Validation. Environments, 13(5), 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13050268

