Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization of Avian-Derived Limosilactobacillus reuteri Strains Showing Pathogen-Inhibiting Activity and Folate Production
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. In Vitro Assays
2.1.1. Sampling of Chicken Cecum and LAB Isolation and Initial Characterization
2.1.2. Hemolytic Activity
2.1.3. In Vitro Acid and Bile Salt Tolerance
2.1.4. Identification Using Mass Spectrometry Identification (MALDI-TOF MS)
2.1.5. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling
2.1.6. Evaluation of Pathogen-Inhibitory Activity of Cell-Free Supernatants Against Indicator Microorganisms
2.1.7. Factorial Screening of Culture Conditions Affecting Pathogen-Inhibitory Activity
2.1.8. Evaluation of Folate (Vitamin ) Production
2.1.9. Evaluation of Different Prebiotic Concentrations on Bacterial Growth
2.1.10. Statistical Analysis
2.2. Genome Analysis
2.2.1. Genome Sequencing, Processing and Assembly
2.2.2. Plasmid Assembly and Identification
2.2.3. Quality Evaluation and Functional Annotation of Genomic Data
2.2.4. Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI)
2.2.5. In Silico Safety Assessment of Strains’ Genomes
2.2.6. Gene Mining and Prediction of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (BGC)
2.2.7. Functional Reconstruction of Metabolic Pathways
2.2.8. Genomic Context Analysis
2.2.9. Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes (CAZymes) Predicted Terms
2.2.10. Data Availability and Accession Numbers
3. Results
3.1. Bioprospecting and Genome Identification
3.1.1. Preliminary In Vitro Bioprospecting
3.1.2. LBM-Ti173 and LBM-Ti195 Genomic Identification
- Genome assembling and quality
- Taxonomic identification and comparative genomic analysis
3.2. Safety Profile
3.2.1. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of L. reuteri LBM-Ti173 and LBM-Ti195
3.2.2. In Silico Antimicrobial Resistance Assessment and Pathogenic Genes
3.3. Probiotic-Associated Traits of L. reuteri LBM-Ti173 and LBM-Ti195
3.3.1. Inhibitory Spectrum of Cell-Free Supernatants
- Inhibitory Spectrum of CFS from L. reuteri LBM-Ti173 and LBM-Ti195
- Pathogen-Inhibitory Activity Under Different Culture Conditions
- Gene mining of potentially bioactive regions
3.3.2. Folate Production
- Intracellular and extracellular vitamin B9 production
- In silico reconstruction of B9-vitamin biosynthetic pathways
3.3.3. Prebiotic Fermentation
- Growth of L. reuteri LBM-Ti195 and LBM-Ti173 on FOS, MOS, and Inulin as Carbon Source
- In silico comparative analysis of CAZymes in L. reuteri type and probiotic strains
4. Discussion
4.1. Bioprospecting, Identification and Safety
4.2. Probiotic-Associated Traits
4.2.1. Pathogen-Inhibitory Activity
4.2.2. Prebiotic Fermentation and CAZyme Profiles
4.2.3. Folate Biosynthesis and One-Carbon Metabolism as Nutraceutical Determinants
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AMR | Antimicrobial Resistance |
| ANI | Average Nucleotide Identity |
| ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
| BGC | Biosynthetic Gene Cluster |
| BLAST | Basic Local Alignment Search Tool |
| CARD | Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database |
| CAZyme | Carbohydrate-Active Enzyme |
| CDS | Coding DNA Sequence |
| CFU | Colony-Forming Unit |
| COG | Clusters of Orthologous Groups |
| dDDH | Digital DNA-DNA Hybridization |
| DNA | Deoxyribonucleic Acid |
| EFSA | European Food Safety Authority |
| FOS | Fructooligosaccharides |
| GRAS | Generally Recognized as Safe |
| HPLC | High-Performance Liquid Chromatography |
| HMMER | profile Hidden Markov Models |
| KEGG | Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes |
| LAB | Lactic Acid Bacteria |
| LBM | Laboratório de Biotecnologia Microbiana |
| Mb | Megabase |
| MIC | Minimum Inhibitory Concentration |
| MLST | Multi-Locus Sequence Typing |
| MRS | de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe |
| NCBI | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| ORF | Open Reading Frame |
| PCR | Polymerase Chain Reaction |
| PGAAP | Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline |
| QPS | Qualified Presumption of Safety |
| RAST | Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology |
| RGI | Resistance Gene Identifier |
| SD | Standard Deviation |
| SEM | Standard Error of the Mean |
| SNP | Single Nucleotide Polymorphism |
| TYGS | Type Strain Genome Server |
| VFDB | Virulence Factor Database |
| WGS | Whole Genome Sequencing |
| 5,10-CH=THF | 5,10-methenyltetrahydrofolate-polyglutamate |
References
- Pitt, S.J.; Gunn, A. The one health concept. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 2024, 81, 12366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- FAO. Tackling Antimicrobial Resistance in Food and Agriculture; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2024; ISBN 978-92-5-138507-4. [Google Scholar]
- Elsegeny, S.R.; Radwan, F.S.; Elshamy, Y.M.; Amer, S.M.; Mohamed, R.A.; Shokrak, N.M.; Abdella, B. A comprehensive overview of probiotics in aquaculture: From efficacy evaluation to diverse applications. Ann. Microbiol. 2025, 75, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jha, R.; Das, R.; Oak, S.; Mishra, P. Probiotics (Direct-Fed Microbials) in Poultry Nutrition and Their Effects on Nutrient Utilization, Growth and Laying Performance, and Gut Health: A Systematic Review. Animals 2020, 10, 1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sumanu, V.O.; Osuidia, K.E.; Egbuniwe, I.C.; Naidoo, V.; Oosthuizen, M.; Chamunorwa, J.P.; McGaw, L.J. Probiotics as antioxidant, antistress, and growth-enhancing agents in monogastric animals: A narrative review. Front. Vet. Sci. 2026, 13, 1815504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hill, C.; Guarner, F.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Merenstein, D.J.; Pot, B.; Morelli, L.; Canani, R.B.; Flint, H.J.; Salminen, S.; et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 11, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zheng, J.; Wittouck, S.; Salvetti, E.; Franz, C.M.A.P.; Harris, H.M.B.; Mattarelli, P.; O’Toole, P.W.; Pot, B.; Vandamme, P.; Walter, J.; et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 2782–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Duar, R.M.; Frese, S.A.; Lin, X.B.; Fernando, S.C.; Burkey, T.E.; Tasseva, G.; Peterson, D.A.; Blom, J.; Wenzel, C.Q.; Szymanski, C.; et al. Experimental Evaluation of Host Adaptation of Lactobacillus reuteri to Different Vertebrate Species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e00132-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frese, S.A.; Benson, A.K.; Tannock, G.W.; Loach, D.M.; Kim, J.; Zhang, M.; Oh, P.L.; Heng, N.C.K.; Patil, P.B.; Juge, N.; et al. The evolution of host specialization in the vertebrate gut symbiont Lactobacillus reuteri. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1001314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh, T.P.; Kaur, G.; Malik, R.K.; Schillinger, U.; Guigas, C.; Kapila, S. Characterization of Intestinal Lactobacillus reuteri Strains as Potential Probiotics. Probiot. Antimicrob. Proteins 2012, 4, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ali, M.S.; Lee, E.-B.; Lim, S.-K.; Suk, K.; Park, S.-C. Isolation and Identification of Limosilactobacillus reuteri PSC102 and Evaluation of Its Potential Probiotic, Antioxidant, and Antibacterial Properties. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ortiz-Rivera, Y.; Sánchez-Vega, R.; Gutiérrez-Méndez, N.; León-Félix, J.; Acosta-Muñiz, C.; Sepulveda, D.R. Production of reuterin in a fermented milk product by Lactobacillus reuteri: Inhibition of pathogens, spoilage microorganisms, and lactic acid bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 4258–4268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schaefer, L.; Auchtung, T.A.; Hermans, K.E.; Whitehead, D.; Borhan, B.; Britton, R.A. The antimicrobial compound reuterin (3-hydroxypropionaldehyde) induces oxidative stress via interaction with thiol groups. Microbiology 2010, 156, 1589–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gwee, K.-A.; Lee, W.R.W.; Chua, Q.; Chiou, F.K.; Aw, M.M.; Koh, Y.H. The evidence for probiotics in the treatment of digestive disorders in the pediatric population. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2025, 40, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, C.; Chen, W.; Jiang, Y.; Xiao, X.; Zou, Q.; Liang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Q.; Yuan, T.; Guo, R.; et al. A synbiotic formulation of Lactobacillus reuteri and inulin alleviates ASD-like behaviors in a mouse model: The mediating role of the gut-brain axis. Food Funct. 2024, 15, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Khalaifah, H.S. Benefits of probiotics and/or prebiotics for antibiotic-reduced poultry. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 3807–3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Salehizadeh, M.; Modarressi, M.H.; Mousavi, S.N.; Ebrahimi, M.T. Effects of probiotic lactic acid bacteria on growth performance, carcass characteristics, hematological indices, humoral immunity, and IGF-I gene expression in broiler chicken. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2019, 51, 2279–2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chai, C.; Guo, Y.; Mohamed, T.; Bumbie, G.Z.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, X.; Zhao, J.; Du, H.; Tang, Z.; Xu, Y.; et al. Dietary Lactobacillus reuteri SL001 Improves Growth Performance, Health-Related Parameters, Intestinal Morphology and Microbiota of Broiler Chickens. Animals 2023, 13, 1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thomas, C.M.; Saulnier, D.M.A.; Spinler, J.K.; Hemarajata, P.; Gao, C.; Jones, S.E.; Grimm, A.; Balderas, M.A.; Burstein, M.D.; Morra, C.; et al. FolC2-mediated folate metabolism contributes to suppression of inflammation by probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri. Microbiologyopen 2016, 5, 802–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rostagno, H.S. Nutritional requirements of poultry. In Tabelas Brasileiras Para Aves e Suínos: Composição de Alimentos e Exigências Nutricionais; UFV/Departamento de Zootecnia: Viçosa, MG, Brazil, 2011; p. 252. ISBN 9788560249725. [Google Scholar]
- Sabo, S.D.S.; Mendes, M.A.; Araújo, E.d.S.; Muradian, L.B.d.A.; Makiyama, E.N.; LeBlanc, J.G.; Borelli, P.; Fock, R.A.; Knöbl, T.; Oliveira, R.P.S. Bioprospecting of probiotics with antimicrobial activities against Salmonella Heidelberg and that produce B-complex vitamins as potential supplements in poultry nutrition. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Souza de Azevedo, P.O.; de Medeiros Oliveira, M.; Kuniyoshi, T.M.; Matajira, C.E.C.; Frota, E.G.; Dias, M.; Bermúdez-Puga, S.A.; Pessoa, A.R.S.; Piazentin, A.C.M.; Mendonça, C.M.N.; et al. Phenotypic and genomic characterization of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria with probiotic and biotechnological potential for pathogen control in animal production. New Biotechnol. 2025, 88, 114–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frota, E.G.; Kuniyoshi, T.M.; Oliveira, M.D.M.; Azevedo, P.O.D.S.D.; de Oliveira, T.F.; Cassiano, L.L.; Pessoa, A.R.S.; Sanca, F.M.M.; Almeida, J.V.D.A.; Dias, M.; et al. Exploring the Probiotic and Antimicrobial Potential of Pediococcus Pentosaceus Isolates from Fish: Genomic and Functional Perspectives. Probiot. Antimicrob. Proteins 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- EFSA Scientific Committee; Bennekou, S.H.; Allende, A.; Bearth, A.; Casacuberta, J.; Castle, L.; Coja, T.; Crépet, A.; Halldorsson, T.I.; Hoogenboom, R.; et al. Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms in support of the risk assessment of products used in the food chain. EFSA J. 2025, 23, e9705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Klare, I.; Konstabel, C.; Werner, G.; Huys, G.; Vankerckhoven, V.; Kahlmeter, G.; Hildebrandt, B.; Müller-Bertling, S.; Witte, W.; Goossens, H. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Lactobacillus, Pediococcus and Lactococcus human isolates and cultures intended for probiotic or nutritional use. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007, 59, 900–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weinstein, M.P. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Supplement M100; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Berwyn, PA, USA, 2010; p. 294. ISBN 978-1-68440-066-9. [Google Scholar]
- Cabo, M.L.; Murado, M.A.; González, M.P.; Pastoriza, L. A method for bacteriocin quantification. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1999, 87, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Linares-Morales, J.R.; Cuellar-Nevárez, G.E.; Rivera-Chavira, B.E.; Gutiérrez-Méndez, N.; Pérez-Vega, S.B.; Nevárez-Moorillón, G.V. Selection of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Based on Their Antimicrobial and Enzymatic Activities. Foods 2020, 9, 1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cucick, A.C.C.; Obermaier, L.; Galvão Frota, E.; Suzuki, J.Y.; Nascimento, K.R.; Fabi, J.P.; Rychlik, M.; Franco, B.D.G.D.M.; Saad, S.M.I. Integrating fruit by-products and whey for the design of folate-bioenriched innovative fermented beverages safe for human consumption. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2024, 425, 110895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pacheco Da Silva, F.F.; Biscola, V.; LeBlanc, J.G.; Gombossy de Melo Franco, B.D. Effect of indigenous lactic acid bacteria isolated from goat milk and cheeses on folate and riboflavin content of fermented goat milk. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 71, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laiño, J.E.; Juarez del Valle, M.; Savoy de Giori, G.; LeBlanc, J.G.J. Development of a high folate concentration yogurt naturally bio-enriched using selected lactic acid bacteria. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 54, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laiño, J.E.; Leblanc, J.G.; Savoy de Giori, G. Production of natural folates by lactic acid bacteria starter cultures isolated from artisanal Argentinean yogurts. Can. J. Microbiol. 2012, 58, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cucick, A.C.C.; Laiño, J.E.; de Moreno de LeBlanc, A.; Herkenhoff, M.E.; Suzuki, J.Y.; Franco, B.D.G.M.; Fabi, J.P.; LeBlanc, J.G.; Saad, S.M.I. Impact of folate bio-enriched fermented beverage on vitamin D receptor and folate transporters expression in the colon: Insights from in vitro and in vivo studies. Food Biosci. 2025, 65, 106106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S. fastp 1.0: An ultra-fast all-round tool for FASTQ data quality control and preprocessing. iMeta 2025, 4, e70078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Gorrie, C.L.; Holt, K.E. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, H. Seqtk: Toolkit for Processing Sequences in FASTA/Q Formats. Available online: https://github.com/lh3/seqtk (accessed on 27 May 2026).
- Li, C.; Tian, D.; Tang, B.; Liu, X.; Teng, X.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, Z.; Song, S. Genome Variation Map: A worldwide collection of genome variations across multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D1186–D1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Antipov, D.; Hartwick, N.; Shen, M.; Raiko, M.; Lapidus, A.; Pevzner, P.A. plasmidSPAdes: Assembling plasmids from whole genome sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 3380–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prjibelski, A.; Antipov, D.; Meleshko, D.; Lapidus, A.; Korobeynikov, A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2020, 70, e102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, X.; Shang, J.; Ji, Y.; Sun, Y. PLASMe: A tool to identify PLASMid contigs from short-read assemblies using transformer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, e83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mikheenko, A.; Prjibelski, A.; Saveliev, V.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A. Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i142–i150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Simão, F.A.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Ioannidis, P.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3210–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parks, D.H.; Imelfort, M.; Skennerton, C.T.; Hugenholtz, P.; Tyson, G.W. CheckM: Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015, 25, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, W.; O’Neill, K.R.; Haft, D.H.; DiCuccio, M.; Chetvernin, V.; Badretdin, A.; Coulouris, G.; Chitsaz, F.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Durkin, A.S.; et al. RefSeq: Expanding the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D1020–D1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kanehisa, M.; Sato, Y.; Morishima, K. Blastkoala and ghostkoala: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Overbeek, R.; Olson, R.; Pusch, G.D.; Olsen, G.J.; Davis, J.J.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Gerdes, S.; Parrello, B.; Shukla, M.; et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D206–D214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jain, C.; Rodriguez-R, L.M.; Phillippy, A.M.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Aluru, S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mckinney, W. Pandas: A Foundational Python Library for Data Analysis and Statistics. Python High Perform. Sci. 2011, 14, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Peluso, S.; Aguilera-Gómez, M.; Bortolaia, V.; Catania, F.; Cocconcelli, P.S.; Herman, L.; Moxon, S.; Vernis, L.; Iacono, G.; Lunardi, S.; et al. Annex D—Pipeline for the automated analysis of gene distribution in microbial species. Zenodo 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Musiał, K.; Petruńko, L.; Gmiter, D. Simple approach to bacterial genomes comparison based on Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) using fastANI and ANIclustermap. Acta Univ. Lodz. Folia Biol. Oecol. 2024, 18, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bortolaia, V.; Kaas, R.S.; Ruppe, E.; Roberts, M.C.; Schwarz, S.; Cattoir, V.; Philippon, A.; Allesoe, R.L.; Rebelo, A.R.; Florensa, A.F.; et al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3491–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seemann, T. ABRicate. Available online: https://github.com/tseemann/abricate (accessed on 27 May 2026).
- Darji, S.A.; Joshi, B.P. Identification of antibiotic resistance genes using the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database (CARD). In Biosafety Assessment of Probiotic Potential; Dwivedi, M.K., Ed.; Methods and protocols in food science; Springer US: New York, NY, USA, 2026; pp. 139–148. ISBN 978-1-0716-4757-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arndt, D.; Marcu, A.; Liang, Y.; Wishart, D.S. PHAST, PHASTER and PHASTEST: Tools for finding prophage in bacterial genomes. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1560–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raghuvanshi, R.; Dwivedi, M.K. Identification of virulence genes through virulence factor database (VFDB). In Biosafety Assessment of Probiotic Potential; Dwivedi, M.K., Ed.; Methods and protocols in food science; Springer US: New York, NY, USA, 2026; pp. 149–153. ISBN 978-1-0716-4757-8. [Google Scholar]
- Cosentino, S.; Voldby Larsen, M.; Møller Aarestrup, F.; Lund, O. PathogenFinder--distinguishing friend from foe using bacterial whole genome sequence data. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e77302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Kloosterman, A.M.; Charlop-Powers, Z.; van Wezel, G.P.; Medema, M.H.; Weber, T. antiSMASH 6.0: Improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W29–W35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van Heel, A.J.; de Jong, A.; Song, C.; Viel, J.H.; Kok, J.; Kuipers, O.P. BAGEL4: A user-friendly web server to thoroughly mine RiPPs and bacteriocins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W278–W281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cantalapiedra, C.P.; Hernández-Plaza, A.; Letunic, I.; Bork, P.; Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 5825–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jones, P.; Binns, D.; Chang, H.-Y.; Fraser, M.; Li, W.; McAnulla, C.; McWilliam, H.; Maslen, J.; Mitchell, A.; Nuka, G.; et al. InterProScan 5: Genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1236–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abramson, J.; Adler, J.; Dunger, J.; Evans, R.; Green, T.; Pritzel, A.; Ronneberger, O.; Willmore, L.; Ballard, A.J.; Bambrick, J.; et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 2024, 630, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Teufel, F.; Almagro Armenteros, J.J.; Johansen, A.R.; Gíslason, M.H.; Pihl, S.I.; Tsirigos, K.D.; Winther, O.; Brunak, S.; von Heijne, G.; Nielsen, H. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 1023–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Laskowski, R.A.; MacArthur, M.W.; Moss, D.S.; Thornton, J.M. PROCHECK: A program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993, 26, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, S.; Chan, H.C.S.; Hu, Z. Using PyMOL as a platform for computational drug design. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2017, 7, e1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Jaroszewski, L.; Iyer, M.; Sedova, M.; Godzik, A. FATCAT 2.0: Towards a better understanding of the structural diversity of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, W60–W64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- UniProt Consortium UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, D609–D617. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Egorov, A.A.; Atkinson, G.C. LoVis4u: A locus visualization tool for comparative genomics and coverage profiles. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2025, 7, lqaf009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zheng, J.; Ge, Q.; Yan, Y.; Zhang, X.; Huang, L.; Yin, Y. dbCAN3: Automated carbohydrate-active enzyme and substrate annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W115–W121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rajković, A.; Beracochea, M.; Rogers, A.B.; Eddy, S.R.; Carter, N.P.; Finn, R.D. HMMER web server: 2026 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2026, gkag373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Buchfink, B.; Xie, C.; Huson, D.H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 59–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Green, J.M.; Matthews, R.G. Folate biosynthesis, reduction, and polyglutamylation and the interconversion of folate derivatives. EcoSal Plus 2007, 2, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peton, V.; Le Loir, Y. Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary medicine. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2014, 21, 602–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ducker, G.S.; Rabinowitz, J.D. One-Carbon Metabolism in Health and Disease. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Corry, J.E.L.; Curtis, G.D.W.; Baird, R.M. Handbook of Culture Media for Food Microbiology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; ISBN 0-444-81498-1. [Google Scholar]
- Allende, A.; Alvarez-Ordonez, A.; Bortolaia, V.; Bover-Cid, S.; De Cesare, A.; Dohmen, W.; Guillier, L.; Jacxsens, L.; Nauta, M.; Mughini-Gras, L.; et al. Updated list of QPS-recommended microorganisms for safety risk assessments carried out by EFSA. Zenodo 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosander, A.; Connolly, E.; Roos, S. Removal of antibiotic resistance gene-carrying plasmids from Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 and characterization of the resulting daughter strain, L. reuteri DSM 17938. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 6032–6040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vinderola, G.; Gueimonde, M.; Gomez-Gallego, C.; Delfederico, L.; Salminen, S. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo assays in selection of probiotics from traditional species of bacteria. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 68, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, M.L.; Martoni, C.J.; Parent, M.; Prakash, S. Cholesterol-lowering efficacy of a microencapsulated bile salt hydrolase-active Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242 yoghurt formulation in hypercholesterolaemic adults. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 107, 1505–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP); Bampidis, V.; Azimonti, G.; Bastos, M.D.L.; Christensen, H.; Dusemund, B.; Kouba, M.; Kos Durjava, M.; López-Alonso, M.; López Puente, S.; et al. Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF-1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs. EFSA J. 2019, 17, e05524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP); Bampidis, V.; Azimonti, G.; Bastos, M.D.L.; Christensen, H.; Dusemund, B.; Fašmon Durjava, M.; Kouba, M.; López-Alonso, M.; López Puente, S.; et al. Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Limosilactobacillus reuteri (formerly Lactobacillus reuteri) DSM 32264 as a feed additive for cats (NBF Lanes s.r.l.). EFSA J. 2022, 20, e07437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Belà, B.; Di Simone, D.; Pignataro, G.; Fusaro, I.; Gramenzi, A. Effects of L. reuteri NBF 2 DSM 32264 Consumption on the Body Weight, Body Condition Score, Fecal Parameters, and Intestinal Microbiota of Healthy Persian Cats. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Swaminathan, B.; Gerner-Smidt, P. The epidemiology of human listeriosis. Microbes Infect. 2007, 9, 1236–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dreyer, M.; Aguilar-Bultet, L.; Rupp, S.; Guldimann, C.; Stephan, R.; Schock, A.; Otter, A.; Schüpbach, G.; Brisse, S.; Lecuit, M.; et al. Listeria monocytogenes sequence type 1 is predominant in ruminant rhombencephalitis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al Hakeem, W.G.; Fathima, S.; Shanmugasundaram, R.; Selvaraj, R.K. Campylobacter jejuni in Poultry: Pathogenesis and Control Strategies. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hermans, D.; Pasmans, F.; Messens, W.; Martel, A.; Van Immerseel, F.; Rasschaert, G.; Heyndrickx, M.; Van Deun, K.; Haesebrouck, F. Poultry as a host for the zoonotic pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012, 12, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ibarguren, C.; Bleriot, I.; Blasco, L.; Fernández-García, L.; Ortiz-Cartagena, C.; Arman, L.; Barrio-Pujante, A.; Rodríguez, O.M.; García-Contreras, R.; Wood, T.K.; et al. The world of phage tail-like bacteriocins: State of the art and biotechnological perspectives. Microbiol. Res. 2025, 295, 128121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Razew, A.; Schwarz, J.-N.; Mitkowski, P.; Sabala, I.; Kaus-Drobek, M. One fold, many functions-M23 family of peptidoglycan hydrolases. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1036964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaus-Drobek, M.; Nowacka, M.; Gewartowska, M.; Korzeniowska Nee Wiweger, M.; Jensen, M.R.; Møretrø, T.; Heir, E.; Nowak, E.; Sabała, I. From discovery to potential application: Engineering a novel M23 peptidase to combat Listeria monocytogenes. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 15628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Couturier, M.; Touvrey-Loiodice, M.; Terrapon, N.; Drula, E.; Buon, L.; Chirat, C.; Henrissat, B.; Helbert, W. Functional exploration of the glycoside hydrolase family GH113. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0267509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Li, W.; Kwok, L.-Y.; Zhang, H. Genomic diversity and functional adaptation of Limosilactobacillus reuteri isolated from diverse ecological niches. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1732127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Soumya, M.P.; Nampoothiri, K.M. An overview of functional genomics and relevance of glycosyltransferases in exopolysaccharide production by lactic acid bacteria. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 184, 1014–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, W.; Ji, Y.; Yang, K.; Liu, L.; Zhang, M.; Qiao, W.; Zhao, J.; Du, M.; et al. Effect of folA gene in human breast milk-derived Limosilactobacillus reuteri on its folate biosynthesis. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1402654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dang, S.; Jain, A.; Dhanda, G.; Bhattacharya, N.; Bhattacharya, A.; Senapati, S. One carbon metabolism and its implication in health and immune functions. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2024, 42, e3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pertiwi, H.; Nur Mahendra, M.Y.; Kamaludeen, J. Folic acid: Sources, chemistry, absorption, metabolism, beneficial effects on poultry performance and health. Vet. Med. Int. 2022, 2022, 2163756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cucick, A.C.C.; Gianni, K.; Todorov, S.D.; LeBlanc, A.D.M.D.; LeBlanc, J.; Franco, B.D.G.M. Evaluation of the bioavailability and intestinal effects of milk fermented by folate producing lactic acid bacteria in a depletion/repletion mice model. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 66, 103785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cucick, A.C.C.; Bedani, R.; Ribeiro, L.S.; Franco, B.D.G.D.M.; Saad, S.M.I. Effect of fruit by-products and orange pectin on folate (vitamin B9) production by selected starter and probiotic strains. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 59, 3929–3938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Jing, W.; Zhang, N.; Hao, J.; Xing, J. Effect of maternal folate deficiency on growth performance, slaughter performance, and serum parameters of broiler offspring. J. Poult. Sci. 2020, 57, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, A.-C.; Deng, Y.-H.; Long, C.; Sheng, X.-H.; Wang, X.-G.; Xiao, L.-F.; Lv, X.-Z.; Chen, X.-N.; Chen, L.; Qi, X.-L. High dietary folic acid supplementation reduced the composition of fatty acids and amino acids in fortified eggs. Foods 2024, 13, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]







| Strain | LBM-Ti173 | LBM-Ti195 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| General features | Gram staining | positive | positive |
| Folate (Vitamin B9) production | positive | positive | |
| Fermentation | hetero | hetero | |
| Acid pH and physiological bile salt condition | tolerant | tolerant | |
| Virulence test | Coagulase | negative | negative |
| Hemolysis | γ | γ | |
| Gelatinase | negative | negative | |
| Catalase | negative | negative |
| Feature | LBM-Ti195 | LBM-Ti173 |
|---|---|---|
| Total reads | 5,314,768 | 5,490,208 |
| Total length (bp) | 2,093,541 | 2,061,835 |
| Number of contigs | 75 | 163 |
| Largest contig (bp) | 167,165 | 63,698 |
| N50 (kb) | 19.62 | 19.62 |
| L50 | 12 | 31 |
| L90 | 42 | 99 |
| N90 (bp) | 15.495 | 6.676 |
| GC content (%) | 38.71 | 38.84 |
| Coverage | 230× | 225× |
| BUSCO completeness (%) | 99.8 | 99.8 |
| CheckM completeness (%) | 99.46 | 99.46 |
| CheckM contamination (%) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| CDSs | 2103 | 2,085 |
| tRNAs | 20 | 17 |
| rRNAs | 2 | 2 |
| ncRNAs | 4 | 4 |
| tmRNAs | 1 | 1 |
| Pseudogenes | 17 | 17 |
| Coding density (%) | 88.9 | 89.3 |
| Antibiotic/Strain | LBM-Ti173 | LBM-Ti195 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIC/Result | MIC/Result | Cut-Off Values | |
| Clindamycin | <0.125 (S) | <0.125 (S) | 4 |
| Ampicillin | 1.0 (S) | 1.0 (S) | 2 |
| Chloramphenicol | 4.0 (S) | 4.0 (S) | 4 |
| Erythromycin | <0.125 (S) | <0.125 (S) | 1 |
| Gentamicin | 0.5 (S) | 0.5 (S) | 8 |
| Kanamycin | 16 (S) | 16 (S) | 64 |
| Streptomycin | 8.0 (S) | 8.0 (S) | 64 |
| Tetracyclin | >64.0 (R) | >64.0 (R) | 32 |
| Vancomycin | >64.0 | >64.0 | NR |
| Antibiotics/Strain | Extracellular (EC) | Intracellular (IC) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| L. reuteri LBM-Ti173 | 32.0 ± 3.7 | 10.2 ± 2.8 | 42.1 ± 4.6 |
| L. reuteri LBM-Ti 195 | 36.8 ± 5.2 | 14.1 ±0.5 | 50.8 ± 4.7 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Kuniyoshi, T.M.; Blanco, I.; Almeida, J.V.d.A.; Matajira, C.E.C.; Cucick, A.C.C.; Oliveira, T.F.d.; Sabo, S.d.S.; Frota, E.G.; Azevedo, P.O.d.S.d.; Sanca, F.M.M.; et al. Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization of Avian-Derived Limosilactobacillus reuteri Strains Showing Pathogen-Inhibiting Activity and Folate Production. Animals 2026, 16, 2039. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16132039
Kuniyoshi TM, Blanco I, Almeida JVdA, Matajira CEC, Cucick ACC, Oliveira TFd, Sabo SdS, Frota EG, Azevedo POdSd, Sanca FMM, et al. Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization of Avian-Derived Limosilactobacillus reuteri Strains Showing Pathogen-Inhibiting Activity and Folate Production. Animals. 2026; 16(13):2039. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16132039
Chicago/Turabian StyleKuniyoshi, Taís Mayumi, Iago Blanco, João Victor dos Anjos Almeida, Carlos Emilio Cabrera Matajira, Ana Clara Candelaria Cucick, Taciana Freire de Oliveira, Sabrina da Silva Sabo, Elionio Galvão Frota, Pamela Oliveira de Souza de Azevedo, Fernando Moises Mamani Sanca, and et al. 2026. "Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization of Avian-Derived Limosilactobacillus reuteri Strains Showing Pathogen-Inhibiting Activity and Folate Production" Animals 16, no. 13: 2039. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16132039
APA StyleKuniyoshi, T. M., Blanco, I., Almeida, J. V. d. A., Matajira, C. E. C., Cucick, A. C. C., Oliveira, T. F. d., Sabo, S. d. S., Frota, E. G., Azevedo, P. O. d. S. d., Sanca, F. M. M., Knirsch, M. C., Oliveira, M. d. M., Varani, A. d. M., & Oliveira, R. P. d. S. (2026). Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization of Avian-Derived Limosilactobacillus reuteri Strains Showing Pathogen-Inhibiting Activity and Folate Production. Animals, 16(13), 2039. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16132039

