Next Article in Journal
Phenotypic and Genetic Comparison of a Plant-Internalized and an Animal-Isolated Salmonella Choleraesuis Strain
Next Article in Special Issue
The Discovery of Vitreoscilla Hemoglobin and Early Studies on Its Biochemical Functions, the Control of Its Expression, and Its Use in Practical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Inhibitory Effect of Ophthalmic Solutions against SARS-CoV-2: A Preventive Action to Block the Viral Transmission?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in the Physicochemical Properties and Biotechnological Application of Vitreoscilla Hemoglobin
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effects of Efficient Expression of Vitreoscilla Hemoglobin on Production, Monosaccharide Composition, and Antioxidant Activity of Exopolysaccharides in Ganoderma lucidum

Microorganisms 2021, 9(8), 1551; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081551
by Zi-Xu Wang 1, Na Li 2,* and Jun-Wei Xu 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Microorganisms 2021, 9(8), 1551; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081551
Submission received: 5 July 2021 / Revised: 19 July 2021 / Accepted: 19 July 2021 / Published: 21 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Hemoglobins)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a valuable contribution to the vhb research field. I think it deserves to be published but I have some concerns:

  1. The present manuscript is an extension of a previously published study. It is important to stress what is new in comparison with the other study.
  2. How has the codon optimisation been achieved? The supplementary figure should also include the amino acid sequence.
  3. What is the actual molecular weight of the VHb protein? Does it carry the intron as an N-terminal extension? If so, does this influence the VHb activity or expression level?
  4. Why is there such a big dfference in the carbohydrate composition between the wt and the VHb strains? Is this significant?
  5. The study is based solely on observations, it is essential to include some explanations or possible interpretations of the changes seen.
  6. Figure 1A should give the size of the plasmid.
  7. I found some typing errors on lines 88, 166, 333 and 394.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Line 45, G. lucdium is spelled incorrectly.

Lines 100, 131 and 133, Use the low-case letters (v/v); (w/v).

Line 151, Check the units (8.8 mmol L−1) and revised all units in the same format.

Line 155, Remove the repeat things =(%)

Figure 1C, the quality of the gel image was too poor, it should be replaced with a high-quality picture.

Figures 3 and 5, What are the stars? Describe them.

Do you know the protein/lipid content of the fungal biomass? How may VHb technology effect the protein or carbohydrate contents of the biomass?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop