Abstract
Vibrio parahaemolyticus is an important foodborne and aquaculture-associated pathogen, and its increasing antimicrobial resistance threatens shrimp production, seafood safety, and public health. Although bacteriophages have emerged as a potential solution to the growing challenge of antimicrobial resistance, whether antibiotic resistance is associated with phage tolerance remains unclear. This study characterized antimicrobial resistance profiles and resistance genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates from Zhanjiang shrimp aquaculture farms and evaluated their association with bacteriophage susceptibility. A total of 132 isolates were tested against 18 antibiotics, while molecular and phage-related analyses were performed on 132 isolates. High resistance was observed against kanamycin (95.5%), sulfamethoxazole (94.7%), cefazolin (78.8%), imipenem (78.8%), amoxicillin (70.5%), and ampicillin (65.2%). Multidrug resistance was detected in 131/132 isolates (99.24%), indicating an extensive resistance burden. PCR analysis showed high detection rates of aphA (100.00%), sul1 (99.24%), blaTEM (98.48%), blaOXA (73.48%), blaCTX-M (53.03%), qnrA (45.45%), tetA (37.88%), and tetB (21.21%). Phage response analysis showed that 70.45% and 68.18% of isolates were phage-resistant at 4 h and 5 h, respectively. Genes potentially associated with phage–host interactions were also detected, with luxS showing the highest frequency (85.61%). Association analysis revealed significant links between tetA, tetB, blaOXA, and bacteriophage responses. These findings suggest that antimicrobial resistance and reduced phage susceptibility can co-occur among V. parahaemolyticus isolates recovered from shrimp farms in Zhanjiang, highlighting the need for regional resistance surveillance and careful phage selection.
1. Introduction
Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a halophilic Gram-negative bacterium that is usually found in marine and estuarine environments and is widely detected in fish, shellfish, and shrimp products worldwide [1,2]. Because consumption of raw or undercooked seafood contaminated with pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus can cause acute gastroenteritis and even death in severe cases [3], it is considered as important foodborne pathogen. In addition to food safety, V. parahaemolyticus is also a major concern in aquaculture, where it occurs naturally in aquatic systems and acts as an opportunistic pathogen in shrimp and other aquatic animals, leading to disease outbreaks, mass mortality and serious losses in production [4,5].
Aquaculture is one of the fastest-growing food-producing sectors globally, but intensive production systems have increased the risk of bacterial disease outbreaks, particularly vibriosis [6]. Among Vibrio species, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, and V. harveyi are frequently associated with severe diseases in marine and brackish aquaculture systems and may also pose risks to human health through the seafood chain [7]. Therefore, the occurrence of V. parahaemolyticus in shrimp aquaculture should be considered not only an animal health problem but also a one-health issue linking aquaculture productivity, seafood safety, and public health [8].
Antibiotics are widely used to control bacterial infections in aquaculture; however, excessive or inappropriate use has contributed to the emergence and evolution of antibiotic-resistant V. parahaemolyticus [9,10]. Previous studies have reported that V. parahaemolyticus isolates are commonly resistant to antibiotics such as ampicillin, kanamycin, and streptomycin, and multidrug-resistant isolates have been recovered from seafood and aquaculture environments [11,12]. The presence of multidrug-resistant pathogens in aquaculture environments is particularly concerning because they can enter aquatic organisms through the food chain and subsequently pose risks to both aquaculture and human health [13,14].
The genetic basis of antimicrobial resistance in V. parahaemolyticus is often linked to antibiotic resistance genes located on chromosomes, plasmids, and other mobile genetic elements [2,15]. Mobile genetic elements facilitate the accumulation and spread of resistance genes through horizontal gene transfer, whereas conjugative plasmids are important vectors for the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes [2,16]. For example, Wang et al. [15] reported a multidrug-resistant V. parahaemolyticus strain carrying resistance genes, including tetB, tetM, sul2, qnrVC6, floR, and blaCARB, with several genes surrounded by transposase genes, suggesting that plasmids and transposons may contribute to the dissemination of resistance genes [17]. Similarly, Sony et al. [7] identified tetB and tetH as predictors of tetracycline resistance in fish-pathogenic Vibrio isolates, supporting the need to connect phenotypic resistance patterns with detected resistance genes.
Due to increasing concerns regarding antibiotic resistance, bacteriophage therapy has been proposed as an alternative or complementary strategy for controlling pathogenic bacteria in aquaculture [18,19]. Phage therapy uses bacteriophages to kill specific bacteria through their natural viral life cycle. Phages are attractive because they usually show high specificity toward bacterial targets and multiply during infection [8,20]. In aquaculture and seafood depuration systems, phages may help reduce Vibrio loads while limiting the disruption of the wider microbiota. Recent studies on V. parahaemolyticus phages have shown that isolated phages can reduce bacterial counts by more than 4 log CFU/mL under suitable conditions, demonstrating their potential for bacterial control [8].
However, the emergence of phage-resistant bacteria remains an important bottleneck for phage-based control strategies [21]. Phage resistance may arise through changes in bacterial receptors, surface structures, defense systems, or other bacterial mechanisms that prevent phage adsorption or replication [22]. Importantly, phage resistance can also carry fitness costs, including reduced growth, altered motility, changes in antibiotic resistance, or reduced virulence [23,24]. Duarte et al. [8] reported that phage-resistant V. parahaemolyticus mutants emerged at low frequency, resistance was not always permanent, and resistant mutants showed reduced bacterial fitness, indicating that the biological cost of phage resistance should be considered when evaluating phage therapy.
Although previous studies have separately examined antimicrobial resistance or bacteriophage control in V. parahaemolyticus, fewer studies have evaluated phenotypic antibiotic resistance, multidrug resistance, antibiotic resistance genes, bacteriophage response, and genes potentially associated with phage–host interactions within the same isolate collection. This gap is important for shrimp aquaculture, where both antibiotic exposure and phage-based control strategies may impact bacterial survival and adaptation. Therefore, the current study was conducted to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, multidrug resistance patterns, distribution of antibiotic resistance genes, bacteriophage susceptibility, and genes potentially associated with phage–host interactions in V. parahaemolyticus isolates. The study also assessed the correlation between the identified resistance genes and phenotypic resistance and between the antibiotic resistance genes and the bacteriophage response. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize antimicrobial resistance profiles and resistance genes among V. parahaemolyticus isolates recovered from shrimp aquaculture farms in Zhanjiang, China, and to investigate the association between detected resistance determinants and susceptibility responses to an isolated bacteriophage.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection
Samples of shrimp intestine, pond sediment and aquaculture water were collected from seven aquaculture farm sites in Zhanjiang, China, namely Huguang Town, Lindong Village, Wensheng Village, Xinliao Town, Yingzai Town, Gaoliao Village, and Donghai Dao (Figure 1; Table 1). Each sample was collected separately in sterile plastic bags to prevent cross-contamination. All samples were cooled immediately after collection and transported to the microbiology laboratory at 7–10 °C for further analysis.
Figure 1.
Spatial distribution of sampling locations across seven aquatic sites in Zhanjiang, China. Map modified from (Standard Map Service of China).
Table 1.
Geographical coordinates and sampling locations of the study sites in Zhanjiang City, Guangdong Province, China.
2.2. Isolation and Identification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus
A total of 89 samples were collected from shrimp aquaculture environments, including 14 shrimp intestine samples, 33 sediment samples, and 42 aquaculture water samples. Following selective isolation, three presumptive Vibrio isolates were obtained from each sample, resulting in 267 recovered isolates. After phenotypic screening, MALDI-TOF MS identification, and molecular confirmation by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, 132 isolates were identified as Vibrio parahaemolyticus, including 60 isolates from sediment samples, 56 from water samples, and 16 from shrimp intestine samples (Table 2). Isolation was conducted following the Chinese National Food Safety Standard GB 4789.7-2013 with minor modifications (GB 4789.7-2013) [25]. Similar selective isolation procedures have been applied for the recovery of Vibrio species from aquaculture and seafood samples [2,7].
Table 2.
Distribution of collected samples and recovery of confirmed Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates from different aquaculture sample types and sites.
First, 10 g of sediment was suspended in sterile distilled water and 20 g of shrimp intestine tissue was aseptically homogenized in sterile phosphate-buffered saline. Water sample processing was done on the premises. Shrimp supernatant, sediment suspension and pond water were streaked on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar and incubated for 18 h at 37 °C. Presumed V. parahaemolyticus colonies were picked based on typical green to blue-green colony morphology on TCBS agar.
The colonies were grown overnight at 37 °C in Luria–Bertani broth with shaking. Isolates were stored in pure culture at −80 °C in LB broth supplemented with glycerol. Initial characterization was performed based on colony morphology, halophilic growth characteristics, and biochemical properties. Species-level identification was subsequently conducted using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). The obtained mass spectra were compared with the reference database, and isolates showing reliable spectral matches consistent with V. parahaemolyticus were selected for subsequent analyses.
To further support species identification, genomic DNA was extracted from MALDI-TOF MS-identified isolates, and amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene were performed using universal primers 27F and 1492R [26]. The obtained sequences were compared with reference sequences available in the NCBI nucleotide database using BLASTn (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool; https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 22 December 2024). The final identification of V. parahaemolyticus isolates was determined based on the combined evidence from MALDI-TOF MS identification, 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, and consistent phenotypic characteristics [26,27].
2.3. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
In accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendations, the broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentration method was used to assess the antimicrobial susceptibility of 132 confirmed V. parahaemolyticus isolates [28]. Antimicrobial resistance in V. parahaemolyticus from aquatic animal and seafood sources has been extensively assessed using MIC-based techniques [2].
Before testing, frozen bacterial stocks were revived to normal conditions in Mueller–Hinton broth supplemented with 2% NaCl and cultured for 18–24 h at 37 °C. Eighteen antibiotics were tested: tetracycline, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, chloramphenicol, ampicillin, amoxicillin, ceftazidime, cefazolin, cefuroxime sodium salt, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, sulfamethoxazole, and kanamycin.
The initial stock concentrations and antibiotic-specific two-fold serial dilution ranges used for MIC determination are provided in Supplementary Table S1. Each antibiotic was prepared individually according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and tested within its corresponding dilution range to ensure accurate interpretation according to antibiotic-specific susceptibility criteria.
Antibiotic stock solutions were prepared at an initial concentration of 5120 μg/mL, sterilized using 0.22 µm membrane filters where required, and stored at −20 °C until use. Working antibiotic solutions were prepared by two-fold serial dilution in Mueller–Hinton broth supplemented with 2% NaCl, with the final testing concentrations adjusted according to the specific dilution range of each antimicrobial agent (Supplementary Table S1).
Bacterial suspensions were adjusted to the 0.5 McFarland standard, yielding a final inoculum of approximately 5 × 105 CFU/mL per well. Antibiotic solutions and bacterial suspensions were transferred into sterile 96-well microtiter plates for MIC determination. Antibiotic-free growth controls containing bacterial suspension without antibiotics and bacteria-free sterility controls containing only culture medium were included in each assay. Plates were incubated for 18–24 h at 37 °C.
The MIC is the lowest antibiotic concentration at which no discernible bacterial growth occurs. The MIC values were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline M45, 3rd Edition, for Vibrio spp. where applicable. Isolates were categorized as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant based on the specific MIC interpretive criteria provided for each antimicrobial agent. The breakpoint sources and corresponding S/I/R criteria used for interpretation are summarized in Supplementary Table S2. For antimicrobial agents without specific Vibrio spp. interpretive criteria, available CLSI recommendations or relevant published criteria were applied, as indicated in Supplementary Table S2A. For antimicrobial agents without specific Vibrio spp. interpretive criteria in CLSI M45, available CLSI M100 criteria were applied [28]. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to at least one antimicrobial agent in three or more antimicrobial classes, according to the internationally accepted definition proposed by Magiorakos et al. and Xiang et al. [29,30]. MDR classification was determined based on the S/I/R interpretation obtained from the MIC breakpoint criteria listed in Supplementary Table S2A. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the quality control strain. All assays were performed in triplicate.
2.4. Phage Isolation, Propagation and Titer Determination
Phage-containing samples with potential lytic activity against V. parahaemolyticus were obtained from aquaculture water and sediment samples using an enrichment method. Phage enrichment and double-layer agar plaque assays were performed following previously described bacteriophage isolation procedures, with slight modifications [8,31].
Briefly, 10 mL of aquaculture water or 10 g of sediment suspension in sterile saline was centrifuged at 8000× g for 10 min to remove particulate matter. The supernatant was mixed with log-phase-sensitive V. parahaemolyticus host strains in alkaline peptone water containing 3.5% NaCl. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 18–24 h with shaking at 120–150 rpm to allow phage adsorption and replication. The enriched cultures were then centrifuged and filtered through 0.22 µm membrane filters to obtain cell-free phage lysates. The lysates were stored at 4 °C for short-term use.
Phage titers were determined using the double-layer agar plaque assay. Phage lysates were serially diluted ten-fold in sterile saline. Aliquots of each dilution were mixed with fresh host bacterial culture and molten soft agar, and then poured onto tryptic soy agar plates supplemented with 3.5% NaCl. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 16–18 h. Plaques were counted, and phage concentrations were expressed as plaque-forming units per milliliter. The same environmental water and sediment samples collected from each aquaculture sampling location were used for both V. parahaemolyticus isolation and bacteriophage enrichment. Therefore, each recovered bacteriophage preparation originated from the same environmental niche as the corresponding bacterial isolates. The V. parahaemolyticus isolates obtained from each sampling location were used as host strains for phage propagation and subsequent susceptibility evaluation. A total of seven bacteriophage isolates were recovered from the seven sampling locations. Each bacteriophage preparation was evaluated against the collection of V. parahaemolyticus isolates obtained from its corresponding sampling location to characterize site-specific phage–host susceptibility patterns.
The susceptibility response of each bacterial isolate was assessed based on phage-mediated growth inhibition using preliminary spot screening followed by quantitative analysis using a 96-well microplate assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
2.5. Preliminary Phage Susceptibility Screening by Spot Assay
The spot assay was performed as a preliminary qualitative screening method to identify potential phage-sensitive V. parahaemolyticus isolates. Because spot lysis may represent either productive phage infection or non-productive lysis from high phage concentrations, spot assay results were not used as the final criterion for susceptibility classification. The spot assay method, which is widely used for preliminary screening of phage susceptibility among bacterial isolates, was performed to evaluate the susceptibility spectrum of isolated bacteriophages against 132 confirmed Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates (Supplementary Figure S1) [32,33]. In this study, seven bacteriophage isolates were used for susceptibility screening. These phages were isolated from the same aquaculture sampling locations where the environmental V. parahaemolyticus isolates were collected, allowing evaluation of phage–host interactions under site-specific ecological conditions. Each phage preparation was tested individually against the bacterial collection to determine phage-specific inhibitory activity and characterize the susceptibility patterns of environmental V. parahaemolyticus isolates. The spot assay was used as an initial qualitative screening approach to identify potentially susceptible bacterial isolates before quantitative confirmation using the 96-well microplate growth inhibition assay.
Each V. parahaemolyticus isolate was cultured at 37 °C with shaking in tryptic soy broth containing 3.5% NaCl until reaching the exponential growth phase. The bacterial suspension was adjusted to approximately 0.5 McFarland standard. Tryptic soy agar supplemented with 3.5% NaCl was overlaid with 100 µL of standardized bacterial culture mixed with 3 mL of molten soft agar.
Ten microliters of phage lysate (approximately 106–108 PFU/mL) were spotted onto each bacterial lawn. Plates were air-dried under aseptic conditions and incubated at 37 °C for 18–24 h. Clear and well-defined lysis zones were considered preliminary evidence of phage activity against the tested isolates. However, because spot assays may detect both productive phage infection and non-productive lysis caused by high phage concentrations, spot assay results were used only for preliminary screening. Isolates showing potential susceptibility were further evaluated using a quantitative 96-well microplate growth inhibition assay, and final susceptibility classification was based on OD600 reduction compared with untreated controls.
Turbid or incomplete lysis indicated reduced susceptibility, whereas absence of visible lysis was recorded as no detectable susceptibility under the tested conditions. All assays were performed in triplicate.
Isolates showing visible lysis zones in the spot assay were subsequently subjected to quantitative growth inhibition analysis using the 96-well microplate assay (Supplementary Table S4).
2.6. Quantitative Assessment of Phage-Mediated Growth Inhibition Using a 96-Well Microplate Assay
The quantitative 96-well microplate growth inhibition assay was used as the final method for evaluating phage susceptibility. The assay was selected because it provides a quantitative measurement of bacterial growth suppression following phage exposure and allows comparison between phage-treated and untreated cultures.
The inhibitory effects of phage lysates against confirmed Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates were quantitatively evaluated using a 96-well microplate growth inhibition assay. This approach was applied to determine bacterial susceptibility by monitoring changes in bacterial growth after phage exposure. Briefly, overnight cultures of V. parahaemolyticus isolates were grown in tryptic soy broth supplemented with 3.5% NaCl and adjusted to approximately 106 CFU/mL before the assay. A standardized volume of bacterial suspension was mixed with phage lysates at selected multiplicity of infection (MOI) values in sterile 96-well microplates. The MOI was calculated as the ratio of phage particles (PFU/mL) to bacterial cells (CFU/mL). A standardized MOI of 0.1 was used for all phage susceptibility experiments. Briefly, bacterial cultures were adjusted to approximately CFU/mL and mixed with phage lysates containing approximately PFU/mL.
Wells containing bacterial cultures without phage addition were used as untreated growth controls, while medium-only wells served as blank controls. The plates were incubated at 37 °C, and bacterial growth was monitored by measuring optical density at 600 nm (OD600) at regular intervals using a microplate reader (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4).
The reduction in OD600 values compared with untreated controls was calculated to determine phage-mediated growth inhibition. The degree of phage-mediated growth inhibition was calculated based on the reduction in OD600 values compared with untreated bacterial controls. Growth inhibition (%) was calculated according to the following equation:
Isolates showing a reproducible reduction in bacterial growth compared with untreated controls were considered susceptible to the tested phage preparation, whereas isolates showing no measurable inhibition were considered non-susceptible under the evaluated conditions. Because phage activity can vary depending on phage–host combinations, susceptibility classification was restricted to the specific phage preparations tested in this study.
This approach has been widely applied for quantitative evaluation of bacteriophage-mediated bacterial growth inhibition in microplate assays [34,35].
All experiments were performed in biological triplicates, and growth inhibition was evaluated based on reproducible differences between phage-treated and untreated bacterial cultures. Susceptibility classification was based on the quantitative reduction in bacterial growth determined from OD600 measurements rather than spot assay observations alone.
The relative growth ratio was calculated as the OD600 value of phage-treated cultures divided by the OD600 value of untreated bacterial controls. A ratio ≥ 1 indicated that phage exposure did not reduce bacterial growth compared with the untreated control, whereas a ratio < 1 indicated measurable growth inhibition by the tested phage preparation. The resulting growth inhibition profiles were used for subsequent classification of phage response patterns. This threshold was applied as an operational criterion to distinguish isolates showing detectable phage-mediated growth inhibition from those showing no measurable inhibition under the tested experimental conditions. Because phage susceptibility represents a continuous response, isolates with values close to the threshold were interpreted cautiously.
2.7. Selection of Isolates Exhibiting Reduced Phage Susceptibility
Isolates exhibiting reduced susceptibility to phage exposure were identified based on the quantitative 96-well microplate growth inhibition assay. The spot assay results were used only as an initial qualitative screening step to identify potential phage activity and guide subsequent quantitative evaluation. Each isolate was evaluated using three independent replicate measurements. For each replicate, the relative growth ratio was calculated as the OD600 value of the phage-treated culture divided by the OD600 value of the untreated control. A replicate was classified as exhibiting reduced susceptibility when the OD600 ratio was ≥1 and as susceptible when the OD600 ratio was <1. The final isolate-level susceptibility phenotype was determined using a majority-rule approach, where isolates showing reduced susceptibility in at least two of the three replicates were classified as exhibiting reduced susceptibility. Isolates that showed no lysis or turbid lysis after exposure to the tested phages were considered to exhibit reduced susceptibility or partial susceptibility and were selected for further molecular screening. The interpretation of phage resistance was based on previously described methods for evaluating bacterial susceptibility and resistance to phage infection [8].
Phage resistance can occur through changes in bacterial surface receptors, lipopolysaccharide structure, restriction–modification systems, quorum sensing regulation, or other bacterial defense mechanisms [22]. Therefore, the selected isolates were further analyzed for the presence of phage resistance-associated genes.
2.8. PCR Detection of Antibiotic Resistance Genes
Genomic DNA was extracted from overnight bacterial cultures using a Rapid Bacterial Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Solarbio Life Sciences, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR was used to detect selected antibiotic resistance genes among the confirmed V. parahaemolyticus isolates. The screened genes included aphA, blaCTX-M, blaOXA, blaTEM, qnrA, sul1, and tetA and tetB. These genes were selected because they are associated with resistance to aminoglycosides, β-lactams, quinolones, sulfonamides, and tetracyclines, which are commonly reported in Vibrio species and aquaculture-associated bacteria (Supplementary Dataset S1) [36,37].
PCR reactions were performed in a final volume of 25 µL containing 12.5 µL of 2× SanTaq PCR Mix, 1 µL of forward primer, 1 µL of reverse primer, 9.5 µL of sterile distilled water, and 1 µL of DNA template. The primer sequences, target genes, and expected amplicon sizes used for detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (tetA, tetB, blaTEM, blaCTX-M, blaOXA, qnrA, sul1, and aphA) are listed in Supplementary Table S5. The cycling conditions included initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at the specific temperature for each primer set, extension at 72 °C for 30 s and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. A negative control containing sterile distilled water instead of DNA template was included in each PCR run to monitor potential contamination and ensure the reliability of amplification results. The annealing temperatures were 56.4 °C for tetA and tetB, blaTEM, and blaCTX-M; 55.7 °C for sul1, aphA, and blaOXA; and 53.5 °C for qnrA. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 2.0% agarose gels in 1× TAE buffer at 124 V and 94 mA for approximately 20 min. A 5000 bp DNA ladder was used as the molecular size marker. Bands of the expected size were visualized using a gel imaging system and recorded as positive amplification.
2.9. PCR Detection of Genes Potentially Associated with Bacteriophage Susceptibility and Resistance
Four bacterial genes potentially involved in bacteriophage susceptibility and resistance mechanisms, including hsdM, luxS, rfb, and ugd, were selected for PCR detection. These genes were not considered phage-specific resistance determinants but were selected based on their reported roles in bacterial processes that may influence phage infection outcomes. The hsdM gene is associated with restriction–modification systems that can limit foreign DNA replication, including phage genomes. The rfb and ugd genes participate in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis and modification, which can influence phage adsorption by altering bacterial surface receptors. The luxS gene was included because AI-2 quorum sensing mediated by LuxS can regulate biofilm formation, bacterial stress responses, and physiological states that may indirectly affect phage susceptibility [38,39,40].
The same reaction combination used for antibiotic resistance genes was used for PCR amplification. Initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, subsequent 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 56.2 °C for luxS and hsdM or 54.5 °C for rfb and ugd, extension at 72 °C for 30 s, and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min were the cycling conditions. Phage–host interaction-associated genes (luxS, rfb, hsdM, and ugd) are listed in Supplementary Table S4. Gel imaging equipment was used to visualize the separated PCR results on 2.0% agarose gels. Positive bands were those that matched the anticipated amplicon sizes.
2.10. Data Analysis
The detection level of Vibrio parahaemolyticus among different sample types was analyzed using the chi-square test in SPSS 20.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and the corresponding antibiotic resistance genes.
The association between antibiotic resistance genes and phage response was analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Since phage response was evaluated at two different time points (4 h and 5 h) using the same bacterial isolates, the associations were assessed separately for each time point. To reduce the potential influence of multiple comparisons, p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate correction. Adjusted p-values (q-values) < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Antibiotic Resistance Profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolates
Eighteen antibiotics were evaluated against 132 V. parahaemolyticus isolates recovered from shrimp farms in Zhanjiang, China. The isolates displayed inconsistent patterns of susceptibility to all the antibiotics that were examined (Table 3; Figure 2). These findings indicate that the isolates showed high resistance to several commonly used antibiotics, particularly sulfonamides, aminoglycosides and β-lactams, while some fluoroquinolones and other antibiotics remained highly active.
Table 3.
Antibiotic susceptibility profile of 132 Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates.
Figure 2.
Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. The y-axis represents the number of V. parahaemolyticus strains (n) and the corresponding percentage distribution (%), while different colors indicate susceptible (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R) responses. Here, S(n), I(n), and R(n) represent the number of susceptible, intermediate, and resistant isolates, respectively, whereas S(%), I(%), and R(%) indicate the corresponding percentages of isolates. The susceptibility testing results showed marked variation in the response of the 132 V. parahaemolyticus isolates to the 18 antimicrobials tested. All isolates were sensitive to ofloxacin and levofloxacin, with high susceptibility to meropenem (99.2%), chloramphenicol (97.0%), doxycycline (94.7%), and gentamicin (90.2%). Cefoxitin, ceftazidime, tetracycline, and cefotaxime all showed moderate susceptibility, indicating varying antibiotic effectiveness. In contrast, kanamycin (95.5%), sulfamethoxazole (94.7%), cefazolin (78.8%), imipenem (78.8%), amoxicillin (70.5%), and ampicillin (65.2%) all had significant resistance rates. Ciprofloxacin and cefuroxime sodium salt demonstrated reduced efficacy, with poor susceptibility and significant intermediate or resistance responses (Supplementary Table S2). The study found that fluoroquinolones and antibiotics like meropenem, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, and gentamicin are highly effective against the isolates. However, resistance to sulfonamides, β-lactams, and some aminoglycosides suggests the presence of multidrug-resistant V. parahaemolyticus, which could impact food safety and public health.
Recovery and Identification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolates
A total of 132 confirmed V. parahaemolyticus isolates were recovered from 89 aquaculture samples. Sediment samples yielded the highest number of confirmed isolates (60/99, 60.6%), followed by water samples (56/126, 44.4%) and shrimp intestine samples (16/42, 38.1%). The distribution of recovered isolates among different sampling sites and sample types is summarized in Table 2.
3.2. Multidrug Resistance and MAR Index
Multidrug resistance was prevalent among V. parahaemolyticus isolates recovered from Zhanjiang shrimp aquaculture farms. According to the MDR criteria proposed by Magiorakos et al. and Xiang et al. [29,30], isolates were classified as multidrug-resistant when they exhibited resistance to at least one antimicrobial agent belonging to three or more antimicrobial categories. Based on this classification, 131 of the 132 isolates (99.24%) were identified as MDR, whereas only one isolate (0.76%) did not meet the MDR criterion. The number of resistant antimicrobial categories among individual isolates ranged from one to seven, while the MAR index values ranged from 0.06 to 0.56.
Among the MDR isolates, resistance across five antimicrobial categories was the most frequently observed pattern, occurring in 51 isolates (38.64%), followed by resistance to six categories in 35 isolates (26.52%) and four categories in 22 isolates (16.67%). Nineteen isolates (14.39%) exhibited resistance to seven antimicrobial categories, representing the highest resistance category observed in this study. In contrast, four isolates (3.03%) showed resistance to three antimicrobial categories (Figure 3). Overall, these findings demonstrate that V. parahaemolyticus isolates recovered from Zhanjiang shrimp aquaculture farms exhibited extensive multidrug resistance across multiple antimicrobial categories, highlighting potential risks associated with antimicrobial dissemination in aquaculture environments and seafood production systems.
Figure 3.
Distribution of multidrug resistance patterns based on antimicrobial categories among 132 Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. The x-axis represents the number of antimicrobial categories to which each isolate exhibited resistance, while the y-axis indicates the number of isolates showing resistance at each category level. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as acquired resistance to at least one antimicrobial agent in three or more antimicrobial categories according to the criteria proposed by Magiorakos et al. [29]. Among the 132 tested isolates, 131 (99.24%) were classified as MDR. Resistance to five antimicrobial categories was the most frequently observed pattern, detected in 51 isolates (38.64%), followed by resistance to six categories in 35 isolates (26.52%) and four categories in 22 isolates (16.67%). Nineteen isolates (14.39%) showed resistance to seven antimicrobial categories, whereas four isolates (3.03%) exhibited resistance to three antimicrobial categories. Only one isolate (0.76%) did not meet the MDR criterion.
3.3. Phage Susceptibility and Resistance Profiles
The phage susceptibility of 132 Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates was analyzed. The response of bacterial isolates to phage exposure was estimated by measuring the changes in bacterial growth (OD600) at 4 and 5 h post phage treatment. Optical density measurements in growth inhibition assays are widely used to assess bacteriophage activity and to classify bacterial susceptibility responses to phages [41,42]. All experiments were carried out in triplicate, and the final classification of each isolate was based on the predominant response from the replicate measurements at each time point.
After exposure to phage, responses to growth allowed for the separation of isolates into phage-susceptible and phage-resistant groups. Phage-resistant isolates were defined as those that continued to grow in the presence of phage; thus, the phage tested could not effectively inhibit and lyse the bacterial cells. In contrast, phage-susceptible isolates were described as those with apparent growth inhibition post phage treatment, which indicated efficient phage-mediated bacterial control [43,44].
Ninety-three isolates (70.45%) were defined as phage-resistant, and 39 isolates (29.55%) were sensitive to phage treatment at 4 h post phage exposure. At 5 h, 90 isolates (68.18%) were still resistant, and 42 isolates (31.82%) were susceptible (Table 4; Figure 4). These findings indicate that a substantial proportion of V. parahaemolyticus isolates exhibited reduced susceptibility to the tested bacteriophage, suggesting potential challenges for phage-based biocontrol applications in aquaculture systems. Detailed replicate-level phage response data are provided in Supplementary Tables S6 and S7.
Table 4.
Bacteriophage susceptibility profile of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates based on isolate-majority classification.
Figure 4.
Sampling-site-specific prevalence of phage-resistant and phage-susceptible Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates at 4 h and 5 h. Isolate phenotypes were assigned based on the majority response of three replicates, with OD2/OD1 ≥ 1 classified as resistant and OD2/OD1 < 1 classified as susceptible. Values represent the percentage of isolates exhibiting resistance or susceptibility at each sampling site [35,45].
3.4. Detection of Antibiotic Resistance Genes
PCR detection of antibiotic resistance genes was performed on 132 isolates that produced interpretable amplification results. The most frequently detected gene was aphA, which was present in all 132 isolates (100%). The sul1 gene was detected in 131 isolates (99.24%), while blaTEM was detected in 130 isolates (98.48%). Other detected genes included blaOXA in 97 isolates (73.48%), blaCTX-M in 70 isolates (53.03%), qnrA in 60 isolates (45.45%), tetA in 50 isolates (37.88%) and tetB in 28 isolates (21.21%) (Table 5; Figure 5).
Table 5.
Detection frequency of antibiotic resistance genes among 132 Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates.
Figure 5.
Detection rates of antibiotic resistance genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. The figure shows the distribution of selected antibiotic resistance genes among 132 V. parahaemolyticus isolates. The highest detection rate was recorded for aphA (100%), followed by sul1 (99.24%) and blaTEM (98.48%), indicating widespread aminoglycoside, sulfonamide, and β-lactam resistance gene carriage. The β-lactam resistance gene blaOXA was also frequently detected (73.48%), as well as blaCTX-M (53.03%). In contrast, qnrA, associated with fluoroquinolone resistance, was detected in 45.45% of isolates, suggesting a moderate occurrence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance. The tetracycline resistance genes tetA (34.09%) and tetB (21.21%) showed lower detection rates. Overall, the findings indicate a high prevalence of resistance genes among V. parahaemolyticus isolates, particularly those associated with aminoglycoside, sulfonamide, and β-lactam resistance.
3.5. Detection of Genes Potentially Associated with Phage Susceptibility
Four bacterial genes previously reported to influence bacterial traits related to phage infection were screened among the 132 isolates. The detected genes included luxS, ugd, rfb, and hsdM. Among the bacterial genes examined, luxS showed the highest detection frequency 113 (85.61%). Although luxS is not a phage-specific resistance determinant, its role in AI-2 quorum sensing may influence bacterial behaviors relevant to phage infection, including biofilm formation, stress adaptation, and population-level physiological regulation. Therefore, the presence of luxS is interpreted as an indirect indicator of bacterial traits that may affect phage susceptibility rather than direct evidence of phage resistance. The ugd gene was detected in 91 isolates (68.94%), followed by rfb in 77 isolates (58.33%) and hsdM in 57 isolates (43.18%) (Table 6; Figure 6). These results show that several isolates carried genes associated with quorum sensing, restriction–modification activity and lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis or modification.
Table 6.
Detection frequency of phage-associated resistance genes among 132 Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates.
Figure 6.
Detection rates of phage-associated resistance genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. The figure shows the detection rates of selected phage-associated resistance genes among V. parahaemolyticus isolates. The highest detection rate was observed for luxS (85.61%), followed by ugd (68.94%) and rfb (58.33%), indicating that these genes were widely distributed among the tested isolates. In comparison, hsdM showed a lower detection rate (43.18%). Overall, the findings suggest that phage-associated genetic elements are commonly present in V. parahaemolyticus isolates and may contribute to the persistence and dissemination of resistance-related traits.
3.6. Relationship Between Phenotypic Resistance and Detected Genes
Comparison of phenotypic antimicrobial resistance and PCR-detected resistance genes showed both strong and partial agreement depending on the antibiotic class. Among the 132 isolates included in the molecular analysis, kanamycin resistance was high, and all isolates carried aphA. This indicates strong agreement between kanamycin resistance and aphA detection, although statistical association could not be meaningfully tested because aphA was present in all isolates. Similarly, sulfamethoxazole resistance corresponded closely with sul1 detection, as sul1 was detected in 131/132 isolates (99.24%) (Table 7; Figure 7).
Table 7.
Phenotype–genotype agreement between antimicrobial resistance and detected resistance genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates.
Figure 7.
Comparative heatmap of antibiotic resistance genes and genes potentially associated with phage–host interactions detected in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates.
For β-lactam antibiotics, resistance was associated with the frequent detection of blaTEM, blaOXA, and blaCTX-M. However, these genes were also detected in isolates that did not show phenotypic resistance to all β-lactam antibiotics, indicating partial agreement between genotype and phenotype. This suggests that gene carriage does not always result in expressed resistance, possibly due to differences in gene expression, regulatory mechanisms, or the involvement of additional resistance determinants.
Detection of qnrA was only partially correlated with resistance to ciprofloxacin. qnrA was detected in 60 of 132 isolates (45.45%), but no statistically significant association was found between it and ciprofloxacin resistance. Among the screened tetracycline resistance determinants, tetA and tetB showed stronger phenotype–genotype agreement with a statistically significant association with tetracycline resistance. This suggests that the gene may contribute substantially to tetracycline resistance among the tested isolates.
The heatmap compares the detection rates of antibiotic resistance genes and genes potentially associated with phage–host interactions among V. parahaemolyticus isolates. Among the antibiotic resistance genes, aphA showed the highest detection rate (100%), followed by sul1 (99.24%) and blaTEM (98.48%), indicating widespread carriage of aminoglycoside, sulfonamide, and β-lactam resistance determinants. blaOXA was also frequently detected (73.48%), while blaCTX-M was detected in (53.03%) of tested isolates. The fluoroquinolone resistance gene qnrA was detected in 45.45% of isolates, while the tetracycline resistance genes tetA and tetB were detected in 37.88% and 21.21% of isolates, respectively. Among the genes potentially associated with phage–host interactions, luxS showed the highest detection rate (85.61%), followed by ugd (68.94%), rfb (58.33%), and hsdM (43.18%). Overall, antibiotic resistance genes showed higher detection rates than most genes potentially associated with phage–host interactions, suggesting a high resistance gene burden in the isolates, while the detection of genes potentially associated with phage–host interactions may indicate possible roles in bacterial adaptation, persistence, or horizontal gene transfer.
3.7. Association Between Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Bacteriophage Response
Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate the association between detected antibiotic resistance genes and reduced susceptibility to the tested bacteriophage preparations at 4 h and 5 h after phage exposure. Because multiple genes were tested at two different time points, p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction. Several genes showed nominal associations with phage response before multiple-testing correction (Table 8). At 4 h, blaOXA showed an inverse association with reduced susceptibility to the tested phage preparation (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11–0.87, p = 0.0295), while tetA showed a positive association with reduced susceptibility to the tested phage preparation (OR = 3.19, 95% CI: 1.33–7.68, p = 0.0102). At 5 h, blaOXA remained inversely associated with phage resistance (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.10–0.76, p = 0.0107), and tetB showed a positive association (OR = 5.00, 95% CI: 1.42–17.66, p = 0.0062). However, these associations did not remain statistically significant after FDR correction, indicating that they should be interpreted as exploratory trends requiring further validation. The complete association matrix, including FDR-adjusted q-values, is provided in Supplementary Table S8.
Table 8.
Nominal associations between antibiotic resistance genes and reduced susceptibility to the tested bacteriophage preparations in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates before multiple-testing correction.
4. Discussion
4.1. Exceptional Multidrug Resistance Burden and Antibiotic-Specific Resistance Patterns in Aquaculture-Associated Vibrio parahaemolyticus: Comparison with Previous Studies
This study revealed an exceptionally high burden of antimicrobial resistance among aquaculture-associated isolates identified as Vibrio parahaemolyticus based on integrated phenotypic and molecular characterization recovered from shrimp farms in Zhanjiang, China, with resistance predominantly concentrated against aminoglycosides, sulfonamides, and selected β-lactam antibiotics. All isolates were sensitive to ofloxacin and levofloxacin, although resistance to kanamycin, sulfamethoxazole, cefazolin, imipenem, amoxicillin, and ampicillin was highest. Unlike a generalized resistance pattern across all antimicrobial classes, the present findings demonstrate a selective resistance profile, where certain antibiotic groups showed extensive loss of activity while others remained highly effective. Similar resistance profiles have been reported in Vibrio isolates from coastal rivers, shrimp farms and seafood products [36,46,47]. However, the level of resistance observed in this study, in particular the near-universal occurrence of MDR, implies that the antimicrobial resistance pressure in the aquaculture environment studied may be high.
The high level of resistance observed in this study might be attributed to the continuous antimicrobial selection pressure in aquaculture systems. Aquatic environments are regarded as important reservoirs for antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, as antibiotic residues, resistant microorganisms, and resistance determinants can enter production systems through pond management practices, sediment accumulation, animal waste discharge, agricultural runoff and human-associated contamination [48,49,50]. The interplay between water, sediment, and microbial communities creates conditions that are conducive to horizontal gene transfer, allowing the maintenance and spread of resistance determinants among bacterial populations [51,52]. Previous studies have demonstrated that aquatic ecosystems can maintain aminoglycoside and sulfonamide resistance determinants even after reductions in antimicrobial usage, suggesting long-term persistence of resistance traits in environmental bacterial communities [53,54]. This view is supported by the strong resistance observed to kanamycin and sulfamethoxazole in the present study and suggests that aquaculture environments may act as reservoirs of clinically relevant resistance genes.
The present study demonstrated one of its most important findings in the form of an extremely high prevalence of MDR among the tested isolates. Out of 132 isolates in this analysis, 131 were MDR (Figure 3), indicating that this is an almost universal characteristic among the isolates tested. This agrees with previous reports on the rising prevalence of MDR in V. parahaemolyticus from seafood and aquaculture environments [55,56,57]. However, the MDR prevalence observed in this study seems to be higher than that of many previously reported environmental Vibrio populations, suggesting that the sampled aquaculture system may represent a highly selective environment favoring the accumulation and maintenance of resistant strains. The high MDR burden observed among isolates from Zhanjiang shrimp farms raises concerns regarding the possible transmission of resistant V. parahaemolyticus through aquatic products and local aquaculture-associated ecosystems and underscores the need for enhanced antimicrobial stewardship in aquaculture practices.
The present analysis found antimicrobial drugs still active against these isolates, despite a broad MDR profile being observed. The preserved effectiveness towards the isolates tested was indicated by complete susceptibility to ofloxacin and levofloxacin, and high susceptibility to meropenem, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, and gentamicin (Table 3; Figure 2). We have previously demonstrated a similar variable antimicrobial response [58,59,60]. Vibrio is likely a function of co-induction of resistance in certain isolates by this antibiotic, perhaps a product of exposure history, local practices for antibiotics, and the genetic background of those isolates against which pathogenicity is being measured. The high resistance to certain antibiotics and the preserved susceptibility to others suggest that the development of antibiotic resistance in V. parahaemolyticus is more a consequence of specific selective pressures than of the general decline of antimicrobial activity. Therefore, antimicrobial susceptibility testing is of paramount importance for guiding appropriate treatment strategies and establishing efficient control measures for aquaculture-associated infections.
4.2. Resistance Mechanisms Associated with Detected Resistance Determinants
The identification of various antimicrobial resistance genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates supported the resistance phenotypes observed in this study. In agreement with the wide distribution of aminoglycoside resistance determinants among the isolates, complete detection of aphA (132/132 isolates) correlated with a very high phenotypic resistance to kanamycin (95.5%). Although aphA is typically associated with aminoglycoside modification via phosphotransferase activity, it was universally detected but not associated with gentamicin resistance in this study; thus, the expression or substrate specificity of the mechanisms responsible for resistance may differ among aminoglycosides [49,53,56]. This indicates that a resistance gene may not necessarily confer resistance to all antibiotics of the same class.
The high prevalence of sul1 was also in accordance with the high rate of sulfamethoxazole resistance (94.7%) detected in this study (99.24%). The strong phenotype–genotype association indicates that sul1-mediated sulfonamide resistance is a prevalent and prominent mechanism among the examined isolates. The wide distribution of sul1, which is often found in mobile genetic elements such as class 1 integrons, could aid in the maintenance and acquisition of multi-resistant phenotypes [53].
The relationship between genotype and phenotype in β-lactam resistance is complex. The resistance observed in antibiotics such as ampicillin, amoxicillin, cefazolin, and other β-lactams is probably attributed to mechanisms involving β-lactamase, as indicated by the detection of blaTEM, blaOXA, and blaCTX-M [61,62]. However, the partial agreement observed between β-lactam resistance phenotypes and individual resistance genes indicates that resistance expression depends on multiple factors, including gene regulation, enzyme activity, membrane permeability, efflux systems, and additional resistance determinants. Therefore, the detection of a β-lactamase gene should be interpreted as evidence of resistance potential rather than a direct predictor of resistance to every β-lactam antibiotic.
Ciprofloxacin resistance also showed only partial agreement with qnrA detection. Although qnrA was identified in 45.45% of isolates, its association with ciprofloxacin resistance was not statistically significant, suggesting that additional mechanisms may contribute to quinolone resistance in the studied population (Table 5; Figure 5). These mechanisms may include mutations in quinolone target genes (gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE), altered membrane permeability, or increased efflux activity [63,64].
For tetracycline resistance, tetA and tetB were considered relevant determinants because their gene presence alone may contribute to the resistant phenotype. In the present study, tetA and tetB showed stronger agreement with tetracycline resistance.
4.3. High Frequency of Reduced Phage Susceptibility and Potential Genetic Factors Associated with Phage–Host Interaction
In the present study, a large proportion of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates exhibited reduced susceptibility to phage exposure, with 93/132 isolates (70.45%) at 4 h and 90/132 isolates (68.18%) at 5 h classified as exhibiting reduced susceptibility to the tested phage preparation (Table 4). These results indicate that reduced susceptibility to phage exposure was frequently observed among the studied isolates, suggesting that a considerable proportion of this population survived phage challenge. Although reduced phage susceptibility can arise through multiple bacterial mechanisms, including receptor modification, restriction–modification systems, CRISPR-Cas defense, abortive infection systems, and biofilm-associated protection, the genetic factors identified in this study may contribute to differences in phage responsiveness among the tested isolates [65,66,67].
Among the identified genes potentially associated with phage–host interactions, luxS was the most abundant (85.61%), suggesting that quorum-sensing-related traits may also be implicated in bacterial persistence during phage challenge. The luxS gene, which is involved in the regulation of autoinducer-2 signaling and bacterial communication, influences biofilm formation, motility, and environmental stress response in Vibrio species. The high prevalence of luxS suggests that quorum-sensing-related traits may potentially influence bacterial persistence during phage challenge [65,68,69]. Biofilm formation can decrease phage efficacy by limiting penetration, increasing protection by an extracellular matrix, and generating metabolically inactive bacterial subpopulations with reduced susceptibility to phage infection [70,71,72].
The presence of ugd (68.94%) and rfb (58.33%) suggests that surface-associated processes may contribute to reduced phage susceptibility in the studied isolates. Both genes are involved in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) synthesis or modification, and LPS structures are widely used as bacteriophage adsorption receptors [73,74,75]. As a result, the comparatively high occurrence of these genes suggests that alterations to bacterial surface structures may influence phage adhesion and infection efficiency [65,76]. However, because this study only examined gene presence, direct alteration of LPS receptors cannot be established. More research with LPS profiling, adsorption tests, and whole-genome sequencing is needed to validate this process.
The occurrence of hsdM in 43.18% of the isolates indicates the involvement of restriction–modification defense mechanisms. Restriction–modification systems can protect bacterial cells by detecting and degrading invading DNA with aberrant methylation [77]. This would provide an additional barrier to phage replication in isolates containing hsdM, although functional validation is required to demonstrate that the expression of this system contributes to reduced phage susceptibility in these strains.
Several resistance genes showed nominal associations with phage response; however, these associations did not remain significant after multiple-testing correction. Therefore, these findings should be considered exploratory observations rather than evidence of direct genetic determinants of phage susceptibility. Before multiple-testing correction, blaOXA showed inverse associations with reduced susceptibility at 4 and 5 h, while tetA and tetB showed positive associations at the respective time points (Table 8). These observations represent exploratory correlations between antibiotic resistance gene profiles and responses to the tested phage preparations. Alternatively, they may arise from shared genomic backgrounds, plasmid carriers, cell coat traits, or stress responses that impact both antimicrobial and phage susceptibility. Additionally, because the isolated bacteriophages originated from specific sampling locations and were evaluated against the corresponding V. parahaemolyticus isolates from those locations, complete separation of phage-specific effects from environmental origin effects was not possible in the present study. Therefore, differences in susceptibility patterns may reflect contributions from phage characteristics, bacterial population structure, environmental variation, or their interactions. Future studies involving larger phage collections, replicated phage–host combinations across multiple sampling locations, and statistical approaches capable of incorporating phage identity and environmental origin will provide further resolution of these effects.
The observed trends involving tetA and tetB at 5 h suggest that tetracycline resistance genetic backgrounds may warrant further investigation in relation to reduced phage susceptibility; however, additional experimental validation is required to determine whether these relationships reflect direct biological mechanisms or indirect evolutionary associations.
It should be noted that the genes investigated in this study represent bacterial determinants, genes potentially associated with phage–host interactions rather than definitive phage resistance genes. Gene presence alone does not confirm functional contribution to phage resistance. Future studies integrating transcriptomic analysis, whole-genome sequencing, adsorption assays, and gene knockout approaches are required to clarify the mechanistic contribution of these determinants.
Although efficiency of plating (EOP) provides a quantitative measurement of productive phage infection and replication efficiency on different bacterial hosts, the objective of the present study was to evaluate comparative phage susceptibility patterns and growth inhibition responses among a collection of environmental Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates obtained from different aquaculture sampling locations. Therefore, a microplate-based growth inhibition approach was applied as a high-throughput quantitative method to evaluate phage-mediated suppression of bacterial growth across numerous isolates. This approach enabled comparative assessment of phage responsiveness within the tested population and supported the identification of isolates exhibiting reduced susceptibility to phage exposure.
4.4. Potential Application of Phage-Based Control Strategies in Aquaculture
The prevalence of multidrug-resistant Vibrio parahaemolyticus reported in this study indicates the need for alternative measures to control pathogens in shrimp farming. Individually, the wide-ranging antimicrobial resistance of isolates and decreased phage sensitivity observed in exposure trials indicate that antibiotic control alone may not sufficiently regulate resistant V. parahaemolyticus populations in aquaculture.
Although phage therapy holds great promise because it is specific targeted bacteria and has minimal effects on beneficial microbial communities, the large proportion of phage-resistant isolates in this study highlights a central theme: the effective application of phages requires the identification and careful selection of active phages for use against defined bacterial populations. Phage cocktails or integrated methods that merge phage use with improved biosecurity, water quality, and antimicrobial stewardship may represent more sustainable and long-term solutions for regulating V. parahaemolyticus in aquaculture systems.
4.5. Limitations of the Study
Several limitations should be considered when interpreting the findings of this study. First, the phage susceptibility analysis was performed using the isolated phage preparations against the collected V. parahaemolyticus isolates, and therefore the observed susceptibility patterns may not represent all environmental populations of V. parahaemolyticus. Second, although several bacterial genes potentially involved in phage–host interactions were detected, their functional roles were not experimentally validated. Therefore, these genes should be considered candidate factors associated with phage susceptibility rather than confirmed resistance determinants. Third, further characterization of isolated phages, including complete genome sequencing and morphological analysis, would provide additional insights into phage taxonomy and host interaction mechanisms. Future studies involving larger collections of isolates and multiple phage preparations are required to validate and extend these findings.
5. Conclusions
This study revealed a high prevalence of antibiotic resistance among V. parahaemolyticus isolates recovered from shrimp aquaculture farms in Zhanjiang, Guangdong Province, China, and less evident multidrug resistance was reported in the isolates of this population. Although many drugs remain effective, the high-resistance profile suggests aquaculture scenarios as potential main sinks of resistant V. parahaemolyticus populations. Molecular characterization confirmed the widespread presence of antimicrobial resistance determinants, with a strong phenotype–genotype correlation for specific resistance traits. Nevertheless, the observed partial concordance in some resistance phenotypes with the identified genes suggests that antimicrobial resistance in V. parahaemolyticus is likely driven by a mixture of genetic and regulatory variables, as opposed to unique resistance determinants. Moreover, the study revealed a wide distribution of reduced phage susceptibility among isolates, consistent with the extensive loss of host ability across broader geographic regions, indicating that regional or even local-scale evaluations of phage-based control methods must prove effective prior to use in phage-applicable systems. Antimicrobial resistance and lower phage susceptibility co-existed, indicating the necessity of comprehensive controls in aquaculture systems that consider antimicrobial management, surveillance for resistance, and improvement in the selection of the most potent phages for the sustainable control of V. parahaemolyticus.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms14092004/s1, Supplementary Dataset S1: Isolate-level dataset for antimicrobial susceptibility, resistance gene detection, and bacteriophage response in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates; Supplementary Table S1: Preparation information and two-fold serial dilution ranges of the 18 antibiotics used for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates; Supplementary Table S2: Raw minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 18 antibiotics against 132 Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates recovered from shrimp aquaculture farms in Zhanjiang, China; Supplementary Table S2A: MIC breakpoint criteria used for antimicrobial susceptibility interpretation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates; Supplementary Table S3: Reported environmental conditions influencing bacteriophage activity against Vibrio parahaemolyticus; Supplementary Table S4: Detection of phage susceptibility strains in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates; Supplementary Table S5: Primer sequences, target genes, and expected amplicon sizes used for PCR detection of antimicrobial resistance and phage-host interaction-associated genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates; Supplementary Table S6: Replicate-Level Bacteriophage Response of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolates at 4 h and 5 h; Supplementary Table S7: Site-specific distribution of phage-resistant and phage-susceptible Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates at 4 h and 5 h incubation periods; Supplementary Table S8: Full Association Analysis Between Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Reduced Susceptibility to the Tested Bacteriophage Preparations in Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolates; Supplementary Figure S1: Initial spot assay screening of phage activity against Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates.
Author Contributions
L.I. and B.C.: data curation, writing—original draft, formal analysis, methodology. E.M.M.: methodology, investigation. S.I.: formal analysis, methodology. F.D.: writing—review and editing, investigation. M.A.: data curation, writing—review and editing. M.F.K.: writing—review and editing, investigation. B.Z. and Y.C.: methodology. S.Z. and J.S.: investigation. Z.F.: supervision, funding acquisition, conceptualization. J.Y.: resources, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (No. 1630012026218), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No. 2026A1515011568).
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), College of Aquatic Sciences, Guangdong Ocean University (protocol code: GDOU-IACUC-2021-A2013, on 11 April 2021).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Chen, L.; Wang, J.; Chen, J.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, H.; Qi, X.; He, Y. Epidemiological Characteristics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Outbreaks, Zhejiang, China, 2010–2022. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1171350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, L.; Yu, P.; Wang, J.; Zhao, T.; Zhao, Y.; Pan, Y.; Chen, L. Genomic and Transcriptomic Analyses Reveal Multiple Strategies for Vibrio parahaemolyticus to Tolerate Sub-Lethal Concentrations of Three Antibiotics. Foods 2024, 13, 1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhu, X.; Yan, H.; Cui, Z.; Li, H.; Zhou, W.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Manoli, T.; Mo, H.; Hu, L. Ultrasound-Assisted Blue Light Killing Vibrio parahaemolyticus to Improve Salmon Preservation. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2023, 95, 106389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sampaio, A.; Silva, V.; Poeta, P.; Aonofriesei, F. Vibrio Spp.: Life Strategies, Ecology, and Risks in a Changing Environment. Diversity 2022, 14, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mok, J.S.; Cho, S.R.; Park, Y.J.; Jo, M.R.; Ha, K.S.; Kim, P.H.; Kim, M.J. Distribution and Antimicrobial Resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolated from Fish and Shrimp Aquaculture Farms along the Korean Coast. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 171, 112785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Deng, Y.; Xu, L.; Chen, H.; Liu, S.; Guo, Z.; Cheng, C.; Ma, H.; Feng, J. Prevalence, Virulence Genes, and Antimicrobial Resistance of Vibrio Species Isolated from Diseased Marine Fish in South China. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sony, M.; Sumithra, T.G.; Anusree, V.N.; Amala, P.V.; Reshma, K.J.; Alex, S.; Sanil, N.K. Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Characteristics of Vibrio Vulnificus, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio Harveyi from Natural Disease Outbreaks of Marine/Estuarine Fishes. Aquaculture 2021, 539, 736608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Duarte, J.; Trindade, D.; Oliveira, V.; Gomes, N.C.M.; Calado, R.; Pereira, C.; Almeida, A. Isolation and Characterization of Infection of Four New Bacteriophages Infecting a Vibrio parahaemolyticus Strain. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Stratev, D.; Fasulkova, R.; Krumova-Valcheva, G. Incidence, Virulence Genes and Antimicrobial Resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolated from Seafood. Microb. Pathog. 2023, 177, 106050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dutta, D.; Kaushik, A.; Kumar, D.; Bag, S. Foodborne Pathogenic Vibrios: Antimicrobial Resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 638331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tan, X.; Qiao, J.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Wang, X. Characterization of Ampicillin-Resistant Genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 168, 105573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lopatek, M.; Wieczorek, K.; Osek, J. Antimicrobial Resistance, Virulence Factors, and Genetic Profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus from Seafood. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e00537-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jeong, H.-W.; Kim, J.; Jeon, S.-J.; Choi, S.-S.; Kim, M.-K.; Yi, H.-J.; Cho, S.-J.; Kim, I.-Y.; Chon, J.-W.; Kim, D.-H.; et al. Prevalence, Antibiotic-Resistance, and Virulence Characteristics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Restaurant Fish Tanks in Seoul, South Korea. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2020, 17, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, Q.; Li, Z.; Fei, X.; Tian, Y.; Zhou, G.; Hu, Y.; Wang, S.; Shi, H. The Role of TolA, TolB, and TolR in Cell Morphology, OMVs Production, and Virulence of Salmonella Choleraesuis. AMB Express 2022, 12, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, T.; Yao, L.; Qu, M.; Wang, L.; Li, F.; Tan, Z.; Wang, P.; Jiang, Y. Whole Genome Sequencing and Antimicrobial Resistance Analysis of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Vp2015094 Carrying an Antimicrobial-Resistant Plasmid. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2022, 30, 47–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bennett, P.M. Plasmid Encoded Antibiotic Resistance: Acquisition and Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Bacteria. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 153, S347–S357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Babakhani, S.; Oloomi, M. Transposons: The Agents of Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria. J. Basic Microbiol. 2018, 58, 905–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rios, A.C.; Moutinho, C.G.; Pinto, F.C.; Del Fiol, F.S.; Jozala, A.; Chaud, M.V.; Vila, M.M.D.C.; Teixeira, J.A.; Balcão, V.M. Alternatives to Overcoming Bacterial Resistances: State-of-the-Art. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 191, 51–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pereira, C.; Costa, P.; Duarte, J.; Balcão, V.M.; Almeida, A. Phage Therapy as a Potential Approach in the Biocontrol of Pathogenic Bacteria Associated with Shellfish Consumption. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 338, 108995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pereira, C.; Moreirinha, C.; Rocha, R.J.M.; Calado, R.; Romalde, J.L.; Nunes, M.L.; Almeida, A. Application of Bacteriophages during Depuration Reduces the Load of Salmonella typhimurium in Cockles. Food Res. Int. 2016, 90, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, C.; Hong, Q.; Chang, R.Y.K.; Kwok, P.C.L.; Chan, H.-K. Phage–Antibiotic Therapy as a Promising Strategy to Combat Multidrug-Resistant Infections and to Enhance Antimicrobial Efficiency. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Azam, A.H.; Tanji, Y. Bacteriophage-Host Arm Race: An Update on the Mechanism of Phage Resistance in Bacteria and Revenge of the Phage with the Perspective for Phage Therapy. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 2121–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hasan, M.; Ahn, J. Evolutionary Dynamics between Phages and Bacteria as a Possible Approach for Designing Effective Phage Therapies against Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zulk, J.J.; Clark, J.R.; Ottinger, S.; Ballard, M.B.; Mejia, M.E.; Mercado-Evans, V.; Heckmann, E.R.; Sanchez, B.C.; Trautner, B.W.; Maresso, A.W.; et al. Phage Resistance Accompanies Reduced Fitness of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli in the Urinary Environment. mSphere 2022, 7, e00345-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- GB 4789.7-2013; National Food Safety Standard—Food Microbiological Examination—Examination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2013.
- Li, Y.; Bi, S.; Guan, W.; Iddrisu, L.; Wei, S.; Chen, Y.; Sun, L.; Deng, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Fang, Z.; et al. Antibiotic Susceptibility of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolated from Prawns and Oysters Marketed in Zhanjiang, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2024, 206, 116712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wong, H.C.; Liu, S.H.; Wang, T.K.; Lee, C.L.; Chiou, C.S.; Liu, D.P.; Nishibuchi, M.; Lee, B.K. Characteristics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 from Asia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 3981–3986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant and Pandrug-Resistant Bacteria: An International Expert Proposal for Interim Standard Definitions for Acquired Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xiang, Y.; Wei, Z.; Mo, X.; Liao, Y.; Wen, C.; Liao, M.; Wei, J.; Lin, C.; Li, W.; Chen, J.; et al. Multidimensional Analysis of Pathogen Epidemic Patterns, Their Correlation with Milk Quality, and Drug Resistance and Virulence Traits of Dominant Pathogenic Escherichia coli in High-Somatic-Cell Buffalo Milk: Guangxi, China. Food Microbiol. 2026, 138, 105071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tan, C.W.; Rukayadi, Y.; Hasan, H.; Abdul-Mutalib, N.-A.; Jambari, N.N.; Hara, H.; Thung, T.Y.; Lee, E.; Radu, S. Isolation and Characterization of Six Vibrio parahaemolyticus Lytic Bacteriophages From Seafood Samples. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 616548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fu, J.; Li, Y.; Zhao, L.; Wu, C.; He, Z. Characterization of VB_ValM_PVA8, a Broad-Host-Range Bacteriophage Infecting Vibrio Alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1105924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liang, X.; Wang, Y.; Hong, B.; Li, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wang, J. Isolation and Characterization of a Lytic Vibrio parahaemolyticus Phage VB_VpaP_GHSM17 from Sewage Samples. Viruses 2022, 14, 1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kong, M.; Ryu, S. Bacteriophage PBC1 and Its Endolysin as an Antimicrobial Agent against Bacillus cereus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 2274–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kutter, E.; De Vos, D.; Gvasalia, G.; Alavidze, Z.; Gogokhia, L.; Kuhl, S.; Abedon, S. Phage Therapy in Clinical Practice: Treatment of Human Infections. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2010, 11, 69–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, F.; Zhang, J.; Lin, G.; Chen, X.; Huang, H.; Xu, C.; Chi, H. Antibiotic Resistance and Genetic Profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolated from Farmed Pacific White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) in Ningde Regions. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lian, X.Q.; Liu, G.D.; Huang, M.F.; Fan, Q.H.; Lin, Z.D. Antimicrobial Resistance, Virulence Factors and Phylogenetic Profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Eastern Coast of Shenzhen. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1452942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ma, J.; Jiang, X.; Bi, H.; Li, J.; Ma, X.; Chi, X.; Tang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, H. Horizontal Acquisition of the Type I Restriction–Modification System Enhances Bacterial Pathogenicity by Mediating Methylation of Transcription Factor-Encoding Genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, gkaf659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- García-Aljaro, C.; Melado-Rovira, S.; Milton, D.L.; Blanch, A.R. Quorum-Sensing Regulates Biofilm Formation in Vibrio scophthalmi. BMC Microbiol. 2012, 12, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ye, J.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhao, D.L.; Wang, Q.Y.; Zhang, Y.X. Regulation of Vibrio Alginolyticus Virulence by the LuxS Quorum-sensing System. J. Fish. Dis. 2008, 31, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Silver, S.; Baylor, M. Bacteriophages: Biology and Applications. Microbe Mag. 2006, 1, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Clokie, M.R.J.; Millard, A.D.; Letarov, A.V.; Heaphy, S. Phages in Nature. Bacteriophage 2011, 1, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Labrie, S.J.; Samson, J.E.; Moineau, S. Bacteriophage Resistance Mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hyman, P.; Abedon, S.T. Bacteriophage Host Range and Bacterial Resistance. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 70, 217–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Merabishvili, M.; Pirnay, J.P.; Verbeken, G.; Chanishvili, N.; Tediashvili, M.; Lashkhi, N.; Glonti, T.; Krylov, V.; Mast, J.; Van Parys, L.; et al. Quality-Controlled Small-Scale Production of a Well-Defined Bacteriophage Cocktail for Use in Human Clinical Trials. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lou, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Pan, Y.; Zhao, Y. Mismatch between Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotype and Genotype of Pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolated from Seafood. Food Control 2016, 59, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- de Menezes, F.G.R.; Rodriguez, M.T.T.; de Carvalho, F.C.T.; Rebouças, R.H.; Costa, R.A.; de Sousa, O.V.; Hofer, E.; Vieira, R.H.S.F. Pathogenic Vibrio Species Isolated from Estuarine Environments (Ceará, Brazil)-Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Potential Profiles. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2017, 89, 1175–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yano, Y.; Hamano, K.; Satomi, M.; Tsutsui, I.; Ban, M.; Aue-umneoy, D. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Vibrio Species Related to Food Safety Isolated from Shrimp Cultured at Inland Ponds in Thailand. Food Control 2014, 38, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Narsale, S.A.; Chrisolite, B.; Sivasankar, P.; Subash, P.; Mansoor, M.; Selvamagheswaran, M.; Debbarma, S.; P, M.K.; Baidya, S.; Kadam, R. Isolation, Characterization, Virulence Genes, Antimicrobial Resistant Genes, and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Relation to AHPND from Shrimp Farms in Coastal Districts of Tamil Nadu. Aquac. Int. 2024, 32, 3835–3851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tuan, L.C.; Van Khanh, N.; Tien, H.T.N.B.; Phuong, P.T.; Van Hieu, D.; Thanh, L.T.H.; Loc, N.H. The Occurrence of Antibiotic Resistance Vibrio Isolates from Brackish Water Shrimp Ponds in the Coastal Area in Thua Thien Hue, Vietnam. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol. 2022, 11, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ghenem, L.; Elhadi, N. Isolation, Molecular Characterization, and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolated from Coastal Water in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. J. Water Health 2018, 16, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Silvester, R.; Pires, J.; Van Boeckel, T.P.; Madhavan, A.; Balakrishnan Meenakshikutti, A.; Hatha, M. Occurrence of β-Lactam Resistance Genes and Plasmid-Mediated Resistance Among Vibrios Isolated from Southwest Coast of India. Microb. Drug Resist. 2019, 25, 1306–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Elmahdi, S.; DaSilva, L.V.; Parveen, S. Antibiotic Resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio Vulnificus in Various Countries: A Review. Food Microbiol. 2016, 57, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, Y.B.; Li, Y.; Sun, X.L. Antibiotic Resistance of Bacteria Isolated from Shrimp Hatcheries and Cultural Ponds on Donghai Island, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62, 2299–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ferrini, A.M.; Mannoni, V.; Suffredini, E.; Cozzi, L.; Croci, L. Evaluation of Antibacterial Resistance in Vibrio Strains Isolated from Imported Seafood and Italian Aquaculture Settings. Food Anal. Methods 2008, 1, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Devi, R.; Surendran, P.K.; Chakraborty, K. Antibiotic Resistance and Plasmid Profiling of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolated from Shrimp Farms along the Southwest Coast of India. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 25, 2005–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tan, C.W.; Rukayadi, Y.; Hasan, H.; Thung, T.Y.; Lee, E.; Rollon, W.D.; Hara, H.; Kayali, A.Y.; Nishibuchi, M.; Radu, S. Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolated from Different Types of Seafood in Selangor, Malaysia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 1602–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nilavan, E.; Kumar, A.; Sivam, V.; Vaiyapuri, M.; Koombankallil, R.; Joseph, T.C.; Swaminathan, T.R. Molecular Characterization, Antibiotic Resistance Pattern, and Biofilm Formation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolated from Tropical Seafood. J. AOAC Int. 2025, 108, 612–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Obaidat, M.M.; Salman, A.E.B.; Roess, A.A. Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolates from Seafood from Three Developing Countries and of Worldwide Environmental, Seafood, and Clinical Isolates from 2000 to 2017. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 2060–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zaafrane, S.; Maatouk, K.; Alibi, S.; Ben Mansour, H. Occurrence and Antibiotic Resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolated from the Tunisian Coastal Seawater. J. Water Health 2022, 20, 369–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Canellas, A.L.B.; Lopes, I.R.; Mello, M.P.; Paranhos, R.; de Oliveira, B.F.R.; Laport, M.S. Vibrio Species in an Urban Tropical Estuary: Antimicrobial Susceptibility, Interaction with Environmental Parameters, and Possible Public Health Outcomes. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ekundayo, T.C.; Tabit, F.T. Occurrence and Antibiotic Resistance Risk Burden of Vibrio Mimicus Isolates from Seafood and Aquatic Environments. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Berglund, F.; Böhm, M.-E.; Martinsson, A.; Ebmeyer, S.; Österlund, T.; Johnning, A.; Larsson, D.G.J.; Kristiansson, E. Comprehensive Screening of Genomic and Metagenomic Data Reveals a Large Diversity of Tetracycline Resistance Genes. Microb. Genom. 2020, 6, e000455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Roberts, M.C. Tetracycline Resistance Determinants: Mechanisms of Action, Regulation of Expression, Genetic Mobility, and Distribution. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1996, 19, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, R.; Aranjani, J.M. Bacterial Defense Mechanisms against Bacteriophages: An Evolutionary Arms Race. Arch. Microbiol. 2026, 208, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wahid, B.; Nang, S.C.; Zhao, J.; Kho, Z.Y.; Han, M.; Yu, H.H.-Y.; Wickremasinghe, H.; Bergen, P.J.; Aslam, S.; Schooley, R.T.; et al. Phage Resistance Bidirectionally Altered Antibiotic Susceptibility in Klebsiella pneumoniae via GalE Mutation. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2026, 67, 107738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ahmad, R.; Li, M.; Tong, Y. Characterization, Lytic Activity, and Therapeutic Efficacy of a Novel Phage, BUCT789, Lysing Drug-Resistant Escherichia coli in Galleria Mellonella Larvae. Virology 2026, 621, 110956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vendeville, A.; Winzer, K.; Heurlier, K.; Tang, C.M.; Hardie, K.R. Making “sense” of Metabolism: Autoinducer-2, LUXS and Pathogenic Bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 383–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lee, A.S.Y.; Song, K.P. LuxS/Autoinducer-2 Quorum Sensing Molecule Regulates Transcriptional Virulence Gene Expression in Clostridium difficile. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 335, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Waters, C.M.; Lu, W.; Rabinowitz, J.D.; Bassler, B.L. Quorum Sensing Controls Biofilm Formation in Vibrio cholerae through Modulation of Cyclic Di-GMP Levels and Repression of VpsT. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 2527–2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, L.; Ling, Y.; Jiang, H.; Qiu, Y.; Qiu, J.; Chen, H.; Yang, R.; Zhou, D. AphA Is Required for Biofilm Formation, Motility, and Virulence in Pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013, 160, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jugder, B.-E.; Batista, J.H.; Gibson, J.A.; Cunningham, P.M.; Asara, J.M.; Watnick, P.I. Vibrio Cholerae High Cell Density Quorum Sensing Activates the Host Intestinal Innate Immune Response. Cell Rep. 2022, 40, 111368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ge, H.; Zhang, K.; Gu, D.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Li, G.; Zhu, H.; Chang, Y.; Zhao, G.; Pan, Z.; et al. The RfbN Gene of Salmonella typhimurium Mediates Phage Adsorption by Modulating Biosynthesis of Lipopolysaccharide. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 250, 126803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Broeker, N.K.; Kiele, F.; Casjens, S.R.; Gilcrease, E.B.; Thalhammer, A.; Koetz, J.; Barbirz, S. In Vitro Studies of Lipopolysaccharide-Mediated DNA Release of Podovirus HK620. Viruses 2018, 10, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Machimbirike, V.I.; Vasquez, I.; Cao, T.; Chukwu-Osazuwa, J.; Onireti, O.; Segovia, C.; Khunrae, P.; Rattanarojpong, T.; Booman, M.; Jones, S.; et al. Comparative Genomic Analysis of Virulent vibrio (Listonella) Anguillarum Serotypes Revealed Genetic Diversity and Genomic Signatures in the O-Antigen Biosynthesis Gene Cluster. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hao, G.; Yuan, C.; Shu, R.; Jia, Y.; Zhao, S.; Xie, S.; Liu, M.; Zhou, H.; Sun, S.; Wang, H. O-Antigen Serves as a Two-Faced Host Factor for Bacteriophage NJS1 Infecting Nonmucoid Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 155, 104897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pleška, M.; Qian, L.; Okura, R.; Bergmiller, T.; Wakamoto, Y.; Kussell, E.; Guet, C.C. Bacterial Autoimmunity Due to a Restriction-Modification System. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.






