Next Article in Journal
The Value of Teaching Critical Race Theory in Prison Spaces: Centering Students’ Voices in Pedagogy
Previous Article in Journal
Consuming Desire in Under the Skin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Introduction: Alienated Majesty: On Reading as Othering
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Humanities
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/h9020040
humanities-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Erratum to Humanities 2019, 8(2), 108.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Erratum

Erratum: Interlocutors, Nonhuman Actors, and the Ethics of Literary Signification. Humanities 2019, 8, 108

by
Donald R. Wehrs
Department of English, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
Humanities 2020, 9(2), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/h9020040
Submission received: 10 April 2020 / Accepted: 13 April 2020 / Published: 7 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ethics and Literary Practice)
Versions Notes
The author would like to make the following changes to the published paper (Wehrs 2019):
Page 1: In the abstract there should be a period after “ambassadors”.
Page 1: In the first paragraph, “latter generations of readers” should be “later generations of readers”.
Page 2: In the third paragraph, “dramatized narrative dramatization with stately hexameter cadences” should be “dramatized narrative with stately hexameter cadences”.
Page 9: In the first paragraph, “may unravel or dissolve.” should be “may unravel or dissolve”. The period after dissolve should be deleted.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by this change. The changes do not affect the scholarly results.

Reference

  1. Wehrs, Donald R. 2019. Interlocutors, Nonhuman Actors, and the Ethics of Literary Signification. Humanities 8: 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wehrs, D.R. Erratum: Interlocutors, Nonhuman Actors, and the Ethics of Literary Signification. Humanities 2019, 8, 108. Humanities 2020, 9, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/h9020040

AMA Style

Wehrs DR. Erratum: Interlocutors, Nonhuman Actors, and the Ethics of Literary Signification. Humanities 2019, 8, 108. Humanities. 2020; 9(2):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/h9020040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wehrs, Donald R. 2020. "Erratum: Interlocutors, Nonhuman Actors, and the Ethics of Literary Signification. Humanities 2019, 8, 108" Humanities 9, no. 2: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/h9020040

APA Style

Wehrs, D. R. (2020). Erratum: Interlocutors, Nonhuman Actors, and the Ethics of Literary Signification. Humanities 2019, 8, 108. Humanities, 9(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/h9020040

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop