Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

See attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We would like to thank you for the valuable comments made on our manuscript. We believe we have addressed the received comments. Please see attached table with indications of how each comment was addressed. Thank you for the opportunity to submit the revised version of our manuscript

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The introduction sets the scene for the empirical part, however, the gap in the existing literature is not evident to the reader and must be clearly demonstrated.  Moreover, the structure of the rest paper should be stated at the end of the introduction to guide the reader. In the materials and methods part, at the study area I would expect you to state the sampling method employed to choose the specific areas. In addition, you must justify the sampling method used for the focus groups. Also, you must state whether a pilot study has been performed, and what changes have been made after. Furthermore, how did you ensure reliability and validity in your work? The results are well presented however I would expect you to discuss them by comparing, contrasting with additional sources. In the conclusions you have managed to present the main highlights of your work and to provide interesting recommendations and policy implications. You have acknowledged some limitations related to the current approach, but you have to be more specific regarding your research limitations. The same applies to further research which has been partly stated and could be enhanced.

Overall, a nice effort has been made!

Author Response

We would like to thank you for the valuable comments made on our manuscript. We believe we have addressed the received comments. Please see attached table with indications of how each comment was addressed. Thank you for the opportunity to submit the revised version of our manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Thank you very much for considering all the points I have raised. The quality of your work has been improved substantially.

All the best!