Review Reports
by
- Cesar Facusseh 1,*,
- Armando Salinas 1 and
- Gerardo Altamirano 2
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Sergey V. Burov Reviewer 3: Anonymous Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
In my opinion it would be appropriate to use some pictures of the microstructure
line 166: description in the text does not match to Figure 2a, which is not used in the article
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Does y means and in line 168 "Results y Discussion"?
The expression "5% true strain" (lines 151-161) is clear for understanding but methodologically is not correct.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments:
1. No current literature, only 3 articles from 2010-2019, update required.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 4 Report
I have read with considerable interest the paper which in its actual form is fine to me and suitable for publication. Very minor comments follow with the idea to improve even more the quality of the paper. Some of them can be taken here into account, or used to re-analysis some parts of the paper or other works from the present authors in future manuscripts.
The comments are attached in a pdf file.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf