Current methods for assessing acceleration efforts (acc
efforts) in ice hockey do not account for the influence of initial skating speed on maximal voluntary acceleration capacity, which may lead to a biased evaluation of acc
effort intensity. In this study, we introduce
[...] Read more.
Current methods for assessing acceleration efforts (acc
efforts) in ice hockey do not account for the influence of initial skating speed on maximal voluntary acceleration capacity, which may lead to a biased evaluation of acc
effort intensity. In this study, we introduce the conceptual approach of the relative acceleration threshold (rel
threshold) to ice hockey and outline its potential benefits for the assessment of acc
efforts. Locomotion data derived from observations of 17 players across 10 official games were used to model the initial-skating-speed-dependent maximal voluntary acceleration capacity (a
max–v
init capacity), from which a team-specific rel
threshold was determined (rel
threshold_75% = 3.23 − 0.365v
init), and, subsequently, applied to assess acc
efforts alongside a fix threshold set at 2 m·s
−2 (fix
threshold_2). Differences in acc
efforts depended on the method used (rel
threshold_75% vs. fix
threshold_2) as well as the playing position when using the rel
threshold_75%. The fix
threshold_2 reported 89.1 ± 35.8% more acc
efforts than the rel
threshold_75%. However, only one-third of these acc
efforts exceeded rel
threshold_75%, which is considered indicative of neuromuscularly intense acc
efforts according to the modeled a
max–v
init capacity. Moreover, at skating speeds above 4 m·s
−1, the fix
threshold_2 only assessed a negligible number of acc
efforts, whereas the rel
threshold_75% assessed 27.2 ± 9.3% of all its acc
efforts. In line with established theoretical rationales, the observational findings of this study suggest that an acceleration threshold adapted to the initial skating speed offers a conceptually more valid approach to assessing acc
efforts in ice hockey.
Full article