Skip to Content
InsectsInsects
  • Review
  • Open Access

22 July 2026

22 Pages

House Cricket (Acheta domesticus) as a Promising Functional Ingredient: A Synoptical Review on Nutritional Value, Technological Properties and Sustainability Perspectives

,
,
and
1
Earth Sciences Department of NOVA School of Sciences and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, Caparica, Campus, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
2
GeoBioTec Research Center, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
3
School of Agriculture, Santarém Polytechnic University, Quinta do Galinheiro—S. Pedro, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal
4
CIEQV—Life Quality Research Centre, Avenida Dr. Mário Soares n 110, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal

Simple Summary

The house cricket (Acheta domesticus) is an edible insect with great potential for use as a food ingredient. It is already authorized in the European Union in different processed forms and can be incorporated as powder into familiar foods such as bakery products, pasta, snacks, bars and meat-based formulations. This review summarizes current evidence on its nutritional value, technological properties, safety, and sustainability, reinforcing it as a promising functional ingredient. House cricket powder is rich in protein and contains lipids, chitin-associated fiber, minerals, and vitamins. It may also contribute to food formulation through properties such as water and oil absorption and emulsifying capacity. However, its use requires careful control of allergenicity, microbiological safety, lipid oxidation, substrate variability, and production standardization. Overall, A. domesticus powder appears to be a promising ingredient for sustainable food innovation, but stronger standardization and more human studies are needed before broader health-related claims can be supported.

Abstract

The house cricket (Acheta domesticus) is among the edible insect species authorized under the European Union novel food framework and is increasingly explored as a food ingredient. This review synthesizes current evidence on its nutritional composition, techno-functional properties, safety, sustainability, and application potential for human consumption. A. domesticus powder is a nutrient-dense ingredient, with reported protein contents ranging from 57.4 to 76.19 g/100 g dry material, together with a relevant amino acid profile, unsaturated lipid fraction, chitin-associated fiber, and selected minerals and vitamins. Its techno-functional profile, including water absorption capacity around 175%, oil absorption capacity around 140%, and emulsifying capacity around 77.7%, supports applications in bakery products, snacks, pasta, meat analogs, and protein-enriched foods. From a sustainability perspective, reported feed conversion ratios around 1.5–1.9 and controlled indoor rearing strengthen its relevance for scalable production, although outcomes depend on substrate choice, energy inputs, production scale, and processing conditions. Safety issues, especially allergenicity, cross-reactivity, microbial control, and contaminant monitoring, remain central to industrial use. Overall, A. domesticus powder has emerged and should be regarded as a nutritionally valuable, technologically versatile and promising functional ingredient for sustainable food innovation.

1. Introduction

The increasing demand for nutritious and sustainable food ingredients has intensified interest in edible insects as alternative sources of protein and other nutrients [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Among them, the house cricket (Acheta domesticus) has gained relevance because it is already commercially reared, can be processed into powder, and has been authorized for human consumption under the European Union novel food framework [7,8]. These features make A. domesticus one of the best-characterized insect species for food ingredient development.
A. domesticus is a hemimetabolous insect belonging to the order Orthoptera [9]. Its biomass is mainly valued for its high protein content, relevant amino acid profile, unsaturated lipid fraction, chitin-associated fiber, and contribution to selected minerals and vitamins [6,10,11,12]. In food applications, cricket powder can be incorporated into familiar products such as bakery products, snacks, pasta, meat analogs, and protein-enriched formulations, where it may improve nutritional density and influence technological performance [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. It was among the first insect species to receive authorization under EU Novel Food legislation, reflecting its established safety profile [7,8].
Among edible insects, A. domesticus has a particularly strong position for food ingredient development because it combines regulatory recognition, commercial rearing, nutritional density, and technological applicability [7,8,9,10,11,12,20,21]. Reported protein contents commonly range from 57.4 to 76.19 g/100 g dry material [11,12,22,23], while its water absorption, oil absorption, and emulsifying capacities support its use in processed food matrices such as bakery products, pasta, snacks, bars, and meat-based formulations [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,24]. These characteristics make house cricket powder more than a protein alternative; they position it as a versatile ingredient with nutritional and technological relevance.
To better clarify the distinctive position of A. domesticus among edible insects, Table 1 summarizes the main features that support its relevance as a food ingredient. The promise of house cricket powder is based on the combination of regulatory recognition, controlled rearing, nutritional value, technological applicability, and compatibility with familiar food products.
Table 1. Comparative positioning of Acheta domesticus among edible insects for food ingredient development.
This comparative positioning shows that A. domesticus is particularly relevant for near-term food innovation because it combines regulatory maturity, controlled production, nutritional density, and practical applicability in processed food matrices.
In this review, the term “functional ingredient” refers to the dual contribution of A. domesticus powder to food formulation: techno-functional properties, including water and oil absorption, emulsifying capacity, foaming behavior, and formulation performance [11,13,20,21,24,28,29,30], and emerging bioactive properties, including antioxidant, antihypertensive and gut-related effects [31,32,33,34]. This combined nutritional, technological, and bioactive profile supports the positioning of A. domesticus powder as a promising functional ingredient, while health-related effects require stronger validation in human studies.
Although several studies have examined the nutritional composition, safety, sustainability, consumer acceptance, or technological properties of edible insects, the evidence for A. domesticus remains dispersed across research areas and rarely integrates how rearing, processing, and formulation conditions jointly shape its nutritional quality, technological performance, and safety profile [21,28,29]. Without this integrative perspective, it is difficult to assess the realistic potential of A. domesticus as a food ingredient or to identify the conditions under which its functional properties are reproducible and industrially relevant. This review therefore addresses that gap by providing a focused, critical synthesis across these interconnected dimensions. The added value of this review lies in connecting rearing and processing variables with nutritional composition, techno-functional performance, safety constraints, and realistic industrial applications of A. domesticus powder.
Accordingly, this review aims to: (i) synthesize current knowledge on the nutritional composition, techno-functional properties, safety, and sustainability of A. domesticus powder; (ii) critically assess the evidence supporting its proposed functional and bioactive effects; (iii) identify the main sources of variability affecting composition and performance; and (iv) highlight current challenges and future research needs for its industrial application as a food ingredient.

2. Methodology

This narrative review followed a structured literature search and screening strategy to improve transparency and reproducibility. Peer-reviewed publications were identified in Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed using combinations of the following keywords: “Acheta domesticus”, “house cricket”, “cricket powder”, “cricket flour”, “edible insects”, “nutritional composition”, “amino acids”, “fatty acids”, “minerals”, “vitamins”, “techno-functional properties”, “water absorption”, “oil absorption”, “emulsifying capacity”, “foaming capacity”, “safety”, “allergenicity”, “microbiological quality”, “processing”, “drying”, “life cycle assessment”, “sustainability”, “consumer acceptance”, and “food applications”. The search covered studies published between 2002 and February 2026; 2002 was set as the lower boundary to coincide with the publication of the foundational definition of functional foods adopted in this review, ensuring conceptual consistency in the interpretation of evidence across the included studies. Backward and forward citation tracking of key articles and recent reviews was also performed. European Union legal texts and EFSA scientific opinions relevant to A. domesticus were retrieved from official sources and included regardless of publication year.
The initial search yielded over 300 records; after removal of duplicates and screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts, approximately 97 publications and official sources were retained and used to support this review. Studies were included when they reported compositional, processing, techno-functional, safety, sustainability, consumer-related or food-application data for A. domesticus intended for human consumption, including whole insects, powders, flours, defatted powders, and protein fractions. Studies on other cricket species or edible insects were not used as primary evidence for A. domesticus but were included when they provided direct comparative data useful to contextualize its nutritional, technological, safety or sustainability profile. Studies focused exclusively on animal feed, non-food uses, or insect species without relevance for comparison with A. domesticus were excluded.
Because studies differed in analytical methods, processing conditions, ingredient format, and reporting units, the data were synthesized qualitatively as indicative ranges, not as directly comparable fixed values. Attention was given to unit harmonization in nutritional tables and to identifying cases where dry basis, wet basis, or “as received” values were not clearly distinguished. Unit inconsistencies or comparability problems were flagged in the text or table notes.
The retained literature was organized according to the main themes of the review: regulation, biology and production, nutritional composition, safety, techno-functional properties, sustainability, food applications, consumer acceptance, and future research needs. This structure allowed the evidence to be assessed from an application-oriented perspective, with emphasis on how rearing, processing and formulation conditions influence the industrial potential and limitations of A. domesticus as a food ingredient.

3. Regulations

In the European Union, edible insects intended for human consumption are regulated under the Novel Food Regulation (EU) 2015/2283, which requires pre-market authorization for foods not consumed to a significant degree in the EU before 15 May 1997 [30]. Insect-based foods must additionally comply with general food hygiene requirements, including HACCP-based procedures under Regulation (EC) No 852/2004, and with food information and labeling rules under Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 [31,32].
For Acheta domesticus, two product-specific authorizations are currently in force. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/188 authorizes the placing on the market of frozen, dried, and powder forms of the house cricket as a novel food, defining permitted food categories, maximum use levels, compositional specifications, and labeling requirements [7]. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/5 extends this framework to partially defatted A. domesticus powder, a distinct ingredient form with different compositional and functional characteristics [8]. Both regulations require that allergen information be communicated on the label, given the documented cross-reactivity between cricket proteins and those of crustaceans, mollusks, and dust mites, which constitutes a legal obligation with direct implications for product design, ingredient declaration, and consumer communication [7,8,22].
These authorizations establish market access but simultaneously impose production and processing requirements that are not trivial to meet at industrial scale. Compliance requires substrate traceability, hygienic rearing conditions, validated inactivation and drying protocols, contaminant monitoring, and consistent allergen quantification and labeling [7,8,31,33,34,35]. In practice, many small and medium producers lack the standardized analytical infrastructure to demonstrate compliance across all these dimensions simultaneously, which limits market entry despite formal authorization [34,36].
Outside Europe, regulatory approaches differ substantially. A relevant distinction exists between unprocessed insects, which in some regions are traded under agricultural or traditional food frameworks without specific food safety authorization, and processed insect-based products intended for human consumption, which typically fall under food law and may require safety assessment, specific authorization, or labeling [36,37,38]. Conflating these two categories risks misrepresenting the actual regulatory burden at different stages of the supply chain. Country-specific frameworks range from dedicated insect farming and food standards, such as Thailand’s TAS 8202-2017 for cricket farms, to permitted species lists and import conditions, as in the Singapore Food Agency framework [37,39]. In many markets, insect-based foods remain governed by general food law without insect-specific provisions, creating regulatory uncertainty that affects trade and investment [36,38].
Overall, A. domesticus has a more advanced regulatory status in the European Union than most other edible insect species, with two product-specific authorizations already in force [7,8]. These authorizations provide a strong basis for market development, while further harmonization of analytical methods for proximate composition, allergen quantification, and contaminant monitoring would strengthen industrial standardization. Alignment of labeling practices across Member States is also important for consistent product quality and consumer confidence in cricket-based ingredients [40,41,42]. The main EU regulatory milestones relevant to the commercialization of A. domesticus-derived food ingredients are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Key EU regulatory milestones for the commercialization of Acheta domesticus-derived food ingredients.

4. Biology, Nutritional Profile, Technological Properties and Bioactive Potential

4.1. Biology and Production Considerations

The biological characteristics of Acheta domesticus and the conditions used during production directly affect the quality of the final ingredient. Life cycle stage, rearing temperature, humidity, density, substrate composition, killing method, and drying process influence biomass yield, microbial safety, nutrient composition, and techno-functional performance. These factors are integral to ingredient standardization, not merely production background.

4.1.1. Life Cycle

Acheta domesticus is a hemimetabolous insect that develops through egg, nymphal, and adult stages, without a pupal phase [9]. Under controlled conditions, development from hatch to adult generally involves 8–9 nymphal instars and can take approximately 45 days at around 30 °C. When egg incubation is included, the full egg-to-adult cycle is usually close to 57–60 days [40].
The developmental stage at harvest is relevant for ingredient quality. Younger and adult stages may differ in body composition, particularly in protein, lipid, and chitin fractions. This affects powder composition, digestibility, texture, and technological behavior. For industrial production, harvesting at a defined stage is therefore important to improve batch homogeneity and reduce variability between production cycles [41,42].

4.1.2. Farming Conditions and Management

A. domesticus is usually reared indoors in boxes, containers or cages, which allows better control of feeding, ventilation, hygiene, and pest management [9]. Practical production conditions commonly target approximately 30 ± 2 °C and 50–60% relative humidity, although egg hatching and early development may require higher humidity levels [43,44].
Temperature, humidity, and density affect growth rate, survival, and feed conversion in A. domesticus [25,43,44,45]. Suboptimal conditions can prolong development, increase mortality, and reduce biomass yield, while inadequate humidity control may compromise both development and hygienic quality [25,43,44]. Therefore, environmental control is directly linked to productivity, microbiological quality, and consistency of the final cricket powder [25,45].
Population density is another critical parameter. Higher densities may improve space efficiency, but they can also increase stress, cannibalism, disease transmission, and variability in individual growth [45,46]. For this reason, density should be optimized according to developmental stage and production objective, rather than maximized without control [45,46].

4.1.3. Substrate Selection and Regulatory Constraints

Substrate composition is one of the main determinants of production efficiency and nutritional composition in A. domesticus. Diet influences growth, feed conversion, survival, and the final lipid, mineral, and protein profiles of the biomass [23,26,47,48]. Therefore, differences in feed composition partly explain the variability reported between nutritional studies [11,12,22,23,48].
In the European Union, substrates used for edible insect production must comply with feed hygiene and animal by-product rules, since farmed insects are considered farmed animals [49,50,51]. This restricts the use of some waste streams, including manure and catering waste, and reduces the practical use of highly circular substrates [49,50,51]. Agro-industrial side streams may be relevant, but they require risk-based selection, traceability, and monitoring for biological and chemical contaminants [1,34,52].
From an industrial perspective, substrate choice involves a trade-off between nutritional consistency, safety, and sustainability. Standardized feeds may improve growth performance and compositional reproducibility, but they can reduce sustainability advantages if they compete with conventional feed or food resources [1,34,52,53]. Conversely, low-cost side streams may improve circularity, but can increase variability and safety-monitoring needs [34,49,50,51,52]. This makes substrate standardization central to both sustainability claims and ingredient quality [34,52,53].

4.1.4. Killing and Primary Processing

Killing and primary processing are critical control points in the production of A. domesticus powder because they influence microbial reduction, enzyme activity, browning reactions, nutrient retention, lipid oxidation, and protein functionality [27,52,54,55,56,57,58]. Therefore, the processing method selected affects not only safety, but also the nutritional and technological quality of the final ingredient [27,52,56,57].
Blanching at 100 °C for short periods has been reported to reduce yeasts and molds, limit browning, and improve chitin purity, although losses of minerals and free amino acids may occur [52]. Freezing at −20 °C can preserve several nutrients but may be less effective as a microbial reduction step and may contribute to browning or amino acid degradation during subsequent processing [54,55]. Freeze-drying generally preserves protein structure and thermolabile compounds better, but its high energy demand may limit industrial feasibility [56,57].
Drying conditions also affect ingredient quality. Hot-air, vacuum, microwave, and freeze-drying can lead to different protein contents, antioxidant activity, color, and technological properties in cricket powder [27]. In addition, oven-dried powders may show higher peroxide values and aldehyde formation than lyophilized powders, while lower storage temperatures can reduce oxidative deterioration [57,58]. Thus, industrial protocols should balance safety, nutrient retention, functional performance, shelf-life, and energy cost [27,56,57,58].
In summary, no single killing or drying method simultaneously optimizes microbiological safety, nutrient retention, lipid stability, and techno-functional performance. Freeze-drying best preserves protein structure and functional properties but is energy-intensive, while oven-drying and tray-drying offer cost-effective alternatives with comparable nutritional outcomes [27,49,52]. These trade-offs should be explicitly considered when developing industrial protocols or comparing data across studies.

4.1.5. Feed Efficiency, Genetics, and Health

Feed efficiency is one of the main arguments supporting the production of A. domesticus as a food ingredient. Reported feed conversion ratios (FCR) are commonly around 1.5–1.9 and vary with diet composition, temperature, humidity, density, developmental stage, and production management [25,26,27]. Evaluating FCR together with substrate composition, biomass yield, and nutrient profile provides a more meaningful measure of production efficiency.
Diet quality strongly affects production performance. Diets with adequate protein levels may reduce development time, increase body weight, and improve feed conversion, whereas low-protein or poorly balanced diets may increase FCR and reduce survival [23,26]. These interactions reinforce the importance of substrate standardization not only for nutritional consistency, but also for productive efficiency.
Genetic variability is another relevant factor for industrial standardization. Commercial colonies may differ in growth rate, body size, survival, reproductive performance, and nutrient composition, which can affect both productivity and batch consistency [29,59,60]. The availability of genomic resources and selective breeding tools for A. domesticus may support future selection strategies aimed at improving productive robustness, disease resistance and nutritional uniformity [29,59,60]. Selection programs should preserve genetic diversity to avoid inbreeding and reduced colony resilience [29,59,60].
Animal health remains a major constraint for scale-up. Acheta domesticus densovirus (AdDV) is a relevant pathogen in commercial cricket production and has been associated with mortality outbreaks and production losses [61,62]. Rearing density and environmental conditions can influence virus prevalence, while molecular tools such as qPCR may support early detection and biosecurity monitoring [62,63]. For industrial production, routine health surveillance, controlled density, and traceable colony management are therefore essential to reduce losses and improve ingredient consistency [46,61,62].
Overall, feed efficiency, genetics, and colony health are interconnected determinants of scalability. Improving A. domesticus production requires standardized rearing protocols, disease monitoring, and selection strategies that support stable biomass yield and reproducible ingredient quality.

4.2. Nutritional Values

Acheta domesticus powder is generally described as a nutrient-dense ingredient, mainly because of its high protein content, relevant lipid fraction, chitin-associated fiber, and contribution to selected minerals and vitamins [10,11,12,22]. Reported proximate values show that protein commonly represents the major macronutrient fraction, often above 57% of dry matter, while fat, ash, carbohydrates, and fiber show wider variation between studies [11,12,22,23]. This nutritional profile supports the use of house cricket powder in protein-enriched foods, with composition best reported as a defined range rather than a single fixed value.
Several factors explain this variability. Nutritional composition may differ according to breeding method, sex, developmental stage, and diet [42]. Differences between egg, nymphal, and adult stages may also influence nutrient composition, which is relevant when defining the harvest stage for food ingredient production [41]. Diet is particularly important because A. domesticus can convert supplied nutrients into different body composition profiles [47]. For example, changes in protein formulation may affect body weight and production yield, even when final lipid and mineral contents remain relatively stable [26].
Environmental conditions also influence nutritional outcomes indirectly through their effects on growth, survival, and biomass yield. Temperature and rearing density affect developmental performance and metabolic responses [25], while elevated temperatures and density can also influence survival, growth, and the prevalence of Acheta domesticus densovirus [45]. Therefore, diet, temperature, density and colony health should be considered together when interpreting differences in body composition, including lipid and ash content [23,25,45,48].
Before comparing nutritional data across studies, the analytical basis must be clearly defined. Values reported on a dry matter basis, wet matter basis, or “as received” basis are not directly interchangeable, especially for proximate composition, because moisture affects the apparent concentration of protein, fat, ash, fiber, and carbohydrates [11,12,22,23]. Accordingly, the values presented in the following tables are used as indicative ranges, not as directly comparable fixed standards.

4.2.1. Macronutrients

The proximate composition of A. domesticus powder reported in different studies is summarized in Table 3. Values are expressed as g/100 g dry material, except when otherwise indicated by the original source.
Table 3. Proximate composition of A. domesticus powder reported in selected studies.
The data presented in Table 3 show that protein is the most abundant macronutrient in A. domesticus powder, ranging from 57.4 to 76.19 g/100 g dry material across the selected studies [11,12,22,23]. This confirms the relevance of A. domesticus powder as a protein-rich ingredient for food formulation. The observed range also reflects the influence of production system, diet, processing conditions, and analytical reporting [11,12,22,23,26].
Fat content shows greater variability, ranging from 8.9 to 31.28 g/100 g dry material [11,12,22,23]. This variation is important from an industrial perspective because higher lipid levels can increase energy density and influence texture, while also increasing susceptibility to lipid oxidation during processing and storage [26,64,65]. Lipid content should therefore be evaluated together with drying conditions, packaging, and expected shelf-life.
Carbohydrate and fiber values are also variable. In Table 3, fiber ranges from 3.7 to 16.4 g/100 g dry material, while carbohydrates range from 1.6 to 19.1 g/100 g dry material [11,12,22,23]. The higher carbohydrate and fiber values reported by Andrade et al. [12] may be related to the specific diets used, differences in substrate composition or analytical calculation methods. Since chitin contributes to the fiber fraction, differences in developmental stage, processing, and analytical method may also influence the apparent fiber content [10,57,58,63,64,66].
Overall, the macronutrient profile of A. domesticus powder supports its use in protein enrichment and food product development. The variability observed in fat, carbohydrates, and fiber highlights the need to define cricket powder by diet, harvest stage, processing method, moisture content, and analytical basis to improve comparability and ingredient standardization [11,12,22,23].

4.2.2. Minerals

A. domesticus powder contains nutritionally relevant minerals, including phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, calcium, iron, and zinc [10,11,12]. As shown in Table 4, phosphorus is consistently one of the most abundant minerals, while zinc and iron are present at levels that may contribute to the nutritional value of cricket-based ingredients [10,11,12].
Table 4. Minerals composition of Acheta domesticus in four different breeding systems.
Mineral variability is particularly important for food formulation and labeling. Calcium, potassium, magnesium, and sodium show marked differences between the studies summarized in Table 4, whereas iron and zinc appear less variable across the selected datasets [10,11,12].
The data in Table 4 indicate that A. domesticus powder may be a relevant source of phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, iron, and zinc [10,11,12]. The magnitude of variation differs between minerals: potassium ranges from 126.62 to 1145.28 mg/100 g dry material, while calcium ranges from 149.75 to 238.25 mg/100 g dry material [10,11,12]. This suggests that some minerals are more sensitive to production conditions and feed composition than others.
Dietary strategies such as gut loading may be used to modify the mineral profile of crickets, particularly for minerals such as calcium and phosphorus [11,35]. This approach can support the development of ingredients with targeted nutritional profiles. Mineral enrichment strategies require control because they can also affect growth performance, mineral balance, safety monitoring, and product standardization [11,23].
From an industrial perspective, mineral composition has direct implications for nutrition claims, labeling, and quality control. Producers should therefore report feed composition, harvest stage, processing conditions, and analytical methods together with mineral data [66,67,68,69]. This would improve comparability between studies and support more reliable use of A. domesticus powder in mineral-enriched food formulations [10,11,12].

4.2.3. Vitamins

A. domesticus has been reported to contain several vitamins, particularly B-group vitamins, vitamin E and choline [10,66,67]. Vitamin data extend the nutritional profile of house cricket powder, although available studies differ in sample condition, analytical methods and reporting format [10,66,67]. Vitamin composition is therefore best presented as evidence of nutritional potential rather than as a fixed compositional standard.
Table 5 summarizes the vitamin composition reported for A. domesticus. The table includes data from Payne et al. [67], Ververis et al. [68], and Magara et al. [10], while distinguishing between undried and dried matter when reported by the original source.
Table 5. Vitamins of Acheta domesticus in four different breeding systems.
The data presented in Table 5 indicate that A. domesticus may contribute to the intake of several vitamins, particularly B-group vitamins, vitamin E, and choline [10,67,68]. Among the B-group vitamins, riboflavin, niacin, and pantothenic acid are the most consistently reported across sources, although the magnitude of the values varies between studies and sample conditions [10,67,68].
The comparison between undried and dried matter reported by Ververis et al. [68] shows that sample condition can strongly influence apparent vitamin concentration. This is particularly relevant for vitamins reported across wide ranges, such as vitamins B2, B12, and E, and reinforces the need to clearly indicate the moisture basis when presenting vitamin data [68].
Values preceded by “<“ represent limits reported in the original source and should not be treated as quantified concentrations. In addition, the high variability observed for some vitamins shows that current data are not sufficient to define a stable vitamin profile for A. domesticus powder [10,67,68].
From an industrial and nutritional perspective, vitamin data are most useful as evidence of nutritional potential rather than fixed compositional standards. Future studies should report analytical methods, sample basis, detection limits, and units more consistently, especially when vitamin composition is used for nutritional labeling or product positioning [10,67,68].

4.3. Bioactive Potential

The bioactive profile of A. domesticus is supported primarily by preclinical evidence. Cricket proteins and derived hydrolysates may release peptides with antioxidant, antihypertensive or gut-related effects [31,32,33]. Most available data come from in vitro assays, cell models or animal studies, with fewer human intervention studies [31,32,33,34,68]. A. domesticus is therefore best positioned as a nutrient-dense ingredient with emerging bioactive potential.

Bioactive Potential (Preclinical Evidence)

Protein hydrolysates obtained from A. domesticus have shown in vitro angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitory activity and antioxidant-related effects, including the identification of short peptides with predicted biological activity [70]. In animal models, A. domesticus protein hydrolysates have been associated with reduced blood pressure, improved vascular function, and lower oxidative-stress markers [71]. These findings suggest potential physiological relevance, but they do not establish direct health effects in humans.
Evidence related to gut health is also emerging. In controlled human intervention, cricket consumption increased Bifidobacterium animalis abundance and reduced circulating TNF-α, suggesting possible effects on gut microbiota and inflammation-related markers [31]. The available human evidence remains early, and the effects can depend on dose, matrix, processing, chitin content, and individual microbiota composition. Stronger evidence from well-designed human trials is needed to support health-related claims [31,34,72].
Phenolic compounds have also been detected in A. domesticus, including phenolic acids and flavonoids such as p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, chlorogenic acid, quercetin, naringenin, and apigenin [73]. Because these compounds are reported at low concentrations and probably reflect dietary carry-over from plant-based substrates, they are better interpreted as minor contributors to the bioactive profile of cricket powder rather than primary markers of its functionality [73,74].
Overall, current evidence supports A. domesticus as a source of protein-derived and gut-related bioactive potential. Antioxidant, antihypertensive, and gut-related effects are promising, with future studies needed to evaluate bioaccessibility, peptide stability during digestion, dose–response effects, food matrix interactions, and reproducibility in human populations [32,33,34,72].

4.4. Techno-Functional Properties, Quality and Food Applications

Beyond nutritional composition, the industrial value of A. domesticus powder depends on its techno-functional behavior, physicochemical stability, microbiological quality, and performance in food matrices [13,75,76,77]. These properties determine whether cricket powder can be used not only as a protein-rich ingredient, but also as a functional component affecting hydration, texture, emulsion stability, shelf-life, and sensory quality.
Key techno-functional properties include water absorption capacity, oil absorption capacity, protein solubility, emulsifying capacity, foaming capacity, and foam stability [11,13,20,21,24,72,75,76]. These parameters are relevant because they influence dough hydration, mouthfeel, fat retention, aeration, and structural stability in products such as bakery goods, snacks, meat analogs, and hybrid formulations [13,21,24,72,75,76].
Reported values vary across studies because techno-functional properties depend on cricket composition, particle size, protein structure, lipid content, drying method, defatting, and analytical protocol [47,69,77,78,79,80]. The values summarized in Table 6 are therefore used as indicative benchmarks for formulation, not as fixed standards.
Table 6. Key techno-functional, physicochemical, and microbiological parameters reported for house cricket powder (values are indicative; methods vary across studies).
Physicochemical and microbiological quality are also central to industrial application. Low moisture and low water activity support shelf stability, while microbial counts, pathogen absence, and spore-forming bacteria determine safety and storage suitability [24,57,82]. In addition, lipid oxidation is a major quality limitation because A. domesticus contains unsaturated fatty acids that may generate off-flavors and reduce sensory acceptance during storage [51,52,69,73].
The data summarized in Table 6 show that A. domesticus powder has relevant water and oil absorption capacities, which support its use in products where hydration, mouthfeel, and fat retention are important [20,21]. Its emulsifying capacity also supports applications in systems containing both aqueous and lipid phases, such as meat emulsions, sauces, or hybrid products [20,21,82]. Foaming capacity is lower than its hydration and emulsifying performance, indicating that cricket powder can contribute to aerated systems, but requires formulation adjustments when replacing highly functional foaming proteins [20,21].
Protein solubility is a key determinant of emulsifying and foaming behavior. Reported solubility values are moderate and strongly influenced by pH, with lower solubility near the isoelectric region and improved solubility under alkaline conditions [11,21,81]. This means that the functionality of cricket powder is matrix-dependent and may vary substantially between acidic, neutral, and alkaline food systems.
From a quality perspective, low moisture and water activity support shelf stability, but they do not eliminate the need for microbial and oxidative control [20,21,57,82]. Lipid oxidation remains one of the main limitations for cricket-derived ingredients, particularly during drying, milling, and storage [57,58,69,83]. Packaging strategies that reduce oxygen exposure, together with appropriate storage temperature and oxidation monitoring, are therefore important for maintaining nutritional and sensory quality [57,58,69,83].
Taken together, these data support the use of A. domesticus powder as a technologically useful ingredient, with performance governed by processing, composition, formulation conditions, and the specific technological objective of the final product [13,21,24,28,29,30].

4.4.1. Microbiological Quality and Storage Stability

The microbial load of live or raw A. domesticus can be high, with total aerobic counts and Enterobacteriaceae commonly reported around 107–108 CFU/g, while yeasts and molds may also be present [78,79]. These values underline the importance of controlled processing before raw cricket biomass is used as a food ingredient.
Thermal treatments such as steaming, blanching and drying markedly reduce total viable counts and Enterobacteriaceae, while the absence of major foodborne pathogens depends on hygienic rearing, substrate quality, validated processing, and prevention of post-processing contamination [73,78,79,81]. Storage stability is further supported by low residual moisture, low water activity, suitable packaging, and routine microbial testing, including monitoring of spore-forming bacteria such as Bacillus cereus [64,84,85,86,87,88].

4.4.2. Food Applications

A. domesticus powder has been incorporated into several food matrices, mainly with the aim of increasing protein content, partially replacing conventional ingredients or improving specific technological properties [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. The available studies include bakery products, pasta, meat emulsions, beef patties, shortbread cookies, gluten-free bars, and chocolate chip cookies (Table 7). These applications show that cricket powder is more suitable as an incorporated ingredient than as a visible whole-insect product, which is also relevant for consumer acceptance [14,16,17,18,19,85].
Table 7. Selected food applications of Acheta domesticus powder and their main formulation outcomes.
The technological and sensory impact of cricket powder depends strongly on the incorporation level and food matrix. Moderate inclusion levels can improve nutritional density while maintaining acceptable product quality, but higher levels may darken color, modify flavor, change texture, or reduce acceptability [13,14,16,17,18,19]. Therefore, formulation studies should define not only the percentage of incorporation, but also the technological objective, such as protein enrichment, water retention, texture modification, or partial replacement of meat, fat, or cereal flour.
The data summarized in Table 7 indicate that A. domesticus powder can be used in both cereal-based and meat-based formulations [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. In bakery and cereal products, cricket powder generally increases protein content, while higher incorporation levels can reduce dough extensibility, increase firmness, and darken the final product [13,14,16]. These effects are relevant because color, flavor, and texture are key determinants of consumer acceptance.
In meat-based products, cricket powder can contribute to water and oil retention, texture modification, and partial replacement of meat or fat [15,17]. These properties are consistent with the water and oil absorption capacities described for cricket powder. Formulation optimization helps prevent undesirable changes in color, flavor, pH, or firmness [15,17].
Overall, the most promising applications are familiar processed foods in which cricket powder is not visually identifiable, such as bakery products, snacks, bars, pasta, meat analogs, and hybrid products [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,21]. Successful incorporation depends on controlling particle size, lipid oxidation, flavor, color, and inclusion level. Future product-development studies should combine nutritional enrichment with sensory analysis, shelf-life testing, and consumer acceptance evaluation [14,16,17,18,19,21].

5. Sustainable Utilization of Acheta domesticus: Safety, Scalability and Consumer Acceptance

Functional foods are generally defined as foods that may provide benefits beyond basic nutrition when consumed as part of the usual diet [86]. In the case of Acheta domesticus, this concept should be applied with caution. Current evidence supports house cricket powder primarily as a nutrient-dense and technologically versatile ingredient, rather than as a clinically validated functional food. Therefore, its functionality should be understood as the combined result of nutritional value, techno-functional performance, emerging bioactive potential, safety control, processing conditions, and suitability for incorporation into realistic food matrices.
The nutritional relevance of A. domesticus powder is supported by its high protein content, relevant amino acid profile, unsaturated lipid fraction, chitin-associated fiber, and contribution to selected minerals and vitamins [10,11,12,24,75]. These characteristics justify their use in protein-enriched formulations and in products where nutritional improvement is a major objective. However, the nutritional functionality of cricket powder cannot be interpreted as a fixed species trait, because composition varies with diet, developmental stage, rearing conditions, substrate, killing method, drying process, and ingredient format [21,24,48,49,70,87]. For this reason, A. domesticus powder should be considered a family of ingredient formats rather than a single standardized ingredient category.
Its techno-functional value is also central to its positioning as a functional ingredient. Water absorption capacity, oil absorption capacity, protein solubility, emulsifying capacity, foaming behavior, and formulation performance support its use in bakery products, snacks, pasta, meat analogs, hybrid products, and protein-enriched foods [11,13,20,28,29,71,72,75]. These properties are relevant because they influence dough hydration, mouthfeel, fat retention, emulsion stability, aeration, texture, and structural stability in food matrices. Nevertheless, this functionality is application-dependent and varies with powder composition, particle size, lipid content, protein structure, drying method, defatting, analytical protocol, and the characteristics of the food matrix [13,29,62,63,66,75]. Thus, the functional performance of cricket powder must be evaluated in relation to specific formulations rather than assumed from compositional data alone.
Potential bioactive effects provide an additional, but less established, dimension of functionality. Protein hydrolysates from A. domesticus have shown antioxidant and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory activity in vitro, and animal studies suggest possible antihypertensive and oxidative-stress-related effects [31,32]. Evidence related to gut health is also emerging, including a controlled human intervention reporting changes in gut microbiota and inflammatory markers after cricket consumption [30]. Phenolic compounds have also been detected in A. domesticus, although they are probably present at low concentrations and may reflect dietary carry-over from plant-based substrates rather than being primary markers of cricket functionality [89,90]. Overall, antioxidant, antihypertensive, and gut-related effects are promising, but the available evidence remains mainly preclinical or based on limited human studies [22,30,31,32,84]. Health-related claims should therefore remain cautious until supported by stronger human intervention trials.
Safety is a prerequisite for translating this functional potential into food applications. EFSA assessments concluded that authorized A. domesticus products are safe under the proposed conditions of use, but allergenicity remains a key concern [63,73,76]. Cricket proteins may cause primary sensitization and may cross-react with allergens from crustaceans, mollusks and dust mites; therefore, EU authorizations require specific allergen information on the label [7,8,73]. Microbiological safety also depends on hygienic rearing, substrate quality, validated killing, and drying steps, adequate storage and prevention of post-processing contamination [57,78,79,91,92]. Chemical safety is linked to feed and rearing conditions, since heavy metals or other contaminants may originate from substrates or the production environment [81,91]. Consequently, the safe use of A. domesticus as a functional ingredient requires integrated control of allergens, microbial hazards, chemical contaminants and processing conditions throughout the production chain [40,57,73,82].
Scalability and sustainability further determine whether the functional potential of A. domesticus can be reproduced at industrial level. Although house cricket is frequently presented as an efficient and sustainable protein source, industrial scalability depends on more than feed conversion efficiency. Production costs and environmental performance are influenced by substrate choice, climate control, labor, energy use, drying method, processing efficiency, and final product yield [33,45,54,69,83,88,93]. Standardized feeds may improve growth, survival, and compositional consistency, but may reduce sustainability advantages if they compete with conventional feed or food resources [54,59,88]. Conversely, agro-industrial side streams can improve circularity, but they require traceability and contaminant monitoring [38,50,51,52,53]. Therefore, sustainability should not be treated separately from functionality, because rearing and processing conditions directly affect ingredient composition, safety and techno-functional performance.
Consumer acceptance is the final step in translating functional potential into marketable products. Acceptance is generally higher when insects are incorporated into familiar foods in non-visible forms, such as powders, bars, bakery products, pasta or protein-enriched formulations, rather than presented as whole insects [75,94,95,96]. This makes A. domesticus powder especially relevant for product development, as it allows nutritional enrichment while reducing visual rejection. Studies using cricket powder in bread, pasta, muffins, biscuits, cookies, bars, and meat products show that moderate incorporation levels can improve nutritional value while maintaining acceptable technological and sensory properties [13,14,15,16,17,18]. However, higher inclusion levels may darken color, intensify characteristic flavor, modify texture, and reduce consumer liking [13,14,16,17,18,19,72]. Successful commercialization will therefore depend on sensory optimization, appropriate incorporation levels, control of lipid oxidation, clear allergen communication, transparent sustainability claims, and consumer education [75,85,86,94,95,96,97,98].
Taking together, the available evidence supports the positioning of A. domesticus powder as a promising functional ingredient, but not yet as a clinically validated functional food. Its strongest current functionality lies in the convergence of nutritional density and techno-functional performance, while bioactive effects remain promising but insufficiently confirmed in humans. The main challenge is therefore not only to demonstrate potential health-related benefits, but also to standardize rearing, processing, formulation, and safety control so that nutritional, technological, and bioactive properties become reproducible under realistic industrial and consumption conditions.

6. Conclusions

Acheta domesticus is a promising functional food ingredient, as it combines nutritional density, techno-functional performance, regulatory recognition and practical applicability in familiar food matrices. Recent evidence shows that house cricket powder is a protein-rich ingredient, with reported protein contents ranging from 57.4 to 76.19 g/100 g dry material, together with relevant lipid, chitin-associated fiber, mineral and vitamin fractions. Its water absorption, oil absorption and emulsifying capacities further support its use in bakery products, snacks, pasta, meat analogs, and protein-enriched formulations.
Compared with many edible insects that remain less characterized or mainly associated with traditional consumption, A. domesticus has a more realistic pathway for near-term food innovation. Its authorization under the European Union novel food framework, compatibility with controlled indoor farming, and suitability for powder-based applications strengthen its industrial relevance. These features support its positioning not only as an alternative protein source, but also as a versatile ingredient platform for sustainable food development.
The main challenge is no longer whether A. domesticus has potential, but how to standardize and control this potential across production and processing systems. Diet, developmental stage, rearing conditions, substrate, killing method, drying process, and ingredient format influence composition, safety and technological behavior. Future progress should therefore focus on harmonized analytical methods, standardized rearing and processing protocols, allergen and microbial control, oxidation management, sensory optimization, and stronger human evidence for proposed bioactive effects. Overall, A. domesticus represents one of the most promising edible insect ingredients for functional and sustainable food innovation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.O.; methodology, F.O. and I.D.; validation, R.F.V., M.M.S. and I.D.; investigation, F.O.; writing—original draft preparation, F.O.; writing—review and editing, F.O., R.F.V., M.M.S. and I.D.; supervision, R.F.V., M.M.S. and I.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is financed by national funds through FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., within the scope of the project CERNAS—Research Centre for Natural Resources, Environment, and Society, Ref.ª UID/00681/2023, and co-funded by Santarém Polytechnic University, School of Agriculture.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO]. Looking at Edible Insects from a Food Safety Perspective; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. United Nations Environment Programme. Frontiers 2023. What’s Cooking? An Assessment of the Potential Impacts of Selected Novel Alternatives to Conventional Animal Products; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2023; ISBN 978-92-807-4103-2. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rockström, J.; Thilsted, S.H.; Willett, W.C.; Gordon, L.J.; Herrero, M.; Hicks, C.C.; Mason-D’Croz, D.; Rao, N.; Springmann, M.; Wright, E.C.; et al. The EAT–Lancet Commission on Healthy, Sustainable, and Just Food Systems. Lancet 2025, 406, 1625–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Lumsden, C.L.; Jägermeyr, J.; Ziska, L.; Fanzo, J. Critical Overview of the Implications of a Global Protein Transition in the Face of Climate Change: Key Unknowns and Research Imperatives. One Earth 2024, 7, 1187–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Burlingame, B.; Moltedo, A.; Cafiero, C. Global Protein Sustainability and the United Nations, through to the 2030 Agenda. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1383898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  6. Murugu, D.K.; Onyango, A.N.; Ndiritu, A.K.; Osuga, I.M.; Xavier, C.; Nakimbugwe, D.; Tanga, C.M. From Farm to Fork: Crickets as Alternative Source of Protein, Minerals, and Vitamins. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 704002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  7. European Comission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/188 of 10 February 2022 Authorising thePlacing on the Market ofFrozen, Dried and Powder Forms of Acheta domesticus as aNovel Food under Regulation (EU)2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of theCouncil, and Amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470 (Text with EEARelevance). Off. J. Eur. Union 2022, 30, 10–16. [Google Scholar]
  8. European Comission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU)2023/5 of 3 January 2023Authorising the Placing on the Market of Acheta domesticus (House Cricket) Partially Defatted Powder as a Novel Food andAmending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470. Off. J. Eur. Union 2023, 2, 9–14. [Google Scholar]
  9. Costa, J.M.; Murta, D.D.M.; Magalhães, T.D. Processamento e Utilização de Insetos Em Alimentação Animal; Direcção Geral Alimentação e Veterinária: Lisbon, Portugal, 2018; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  10. Magara, H.J.O.; Niassy, S.; Ayieko, M.A.; Mukundamago, M.; Egonyu, J.P.; Tanga, C.M.; Kimathi, E.K.; Ongere, J.O.; Fiaboe, K.K.M.; Hugel, S.; et al. Edible Crickets (Orthoptera) Around the World: Distribution, Nutritional Value, and Other Benefits—A Review. Front. Nutr. 2021, 7, 537915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  11. Udomsil, N.; Imsoonthornruksa, S.; Gosalawit, C.; Ketudat-Cairns, M. Nutritional Values and Functional Properties of House Cricket (Acheta domesticus) and Field Cricket (Gryllus Bimaculatus). Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2019, 25, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Andrade, R.; Martins, L.L.; Mourato, M.P.; Lourenço, H.; Ramos, A.C.; Roseiro, C.; Pereira, N.; Costa, G.J.; Lucas, R.; Alvarenga, N.; et al. Nutritional and Microbial Quality of Edible Insect Powder from Plant-Based Industrial By-Product and Fish Biowaste Diets. Foods 2025, 14, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Bresciani, A.; Cardone, G.; Jucker, C.; Savoldelli, S.; Marti, A. Technological Performance of Cricket Powder (Acheta domesticus L.) in Wheat-Based Formulations. Insects 2022, 13, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Pauter, P.; Różańska, M.; Wiza, P.; Dworczak, S.; Grobelna, N.; Sarbak, P.; Kowalczewski, P.Ł. Effects of the Replacement of Wheat Flour with Cricket Powder on the Characteristics of Muffins. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2018, 17, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, H.; Setyabrata, D.; Lee, Y.; Jones, O.G.; Kim, Y.H.B. Effect of House Cricket (Acheta domesticus) Flour Addition on Physicochemical and Textural Properties of Meat Emulsion Under Various Formulations. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 2787–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Bawa, M.; Songsermpong, S.; Kaewtapee, C.; Chanput, W. Nutritional, Sensory, and Texture Quality of Bread and Cookie Enriched with House Cricket (Acheta domesticus) Powder. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Cavalheiro, C.; Ruiz-Capillas, C.; Herrero, A.M.; Pintado, T.; Avelar De Sousa, C.C.; Sant’Ana Falcão Leite, J.; Costa Alves Da Silva, M. Potential of Cricket (Acheta domesticus) Flour as a Lean Meat Replacer in the Development of Beef Patties. Foods 2024, 13, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. Tańska, M.; Browarek, J.; Ruszkowska, M.; Purkiewicz, A. Comparative Study on the Incorporation of Lesser Mealworm (Alphitobius diaperinus) and House Cricket (Acheta domesticus) Powders into Shortbread Cookies: Effects on Physical, Chemical and Sensory Properties. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2024, 74, 280–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Pecova, M.; Tauferova, A.; Pospiech, M.; Bartlova, M.; Tremlova, B. Evaluation of gluten-free bars made with house cricket (Acheta domesticus) powder. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2023, 13, e9873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. De Castro, R.J.S.; Ohara, A.; Aguilar, J.G.D.S.; Domingues, M.A.F. Nutritional, Functional and Biological Properties of Insect Proteins: Processes for Obtaining, Consumption and Future Challenges. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 76, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Kröger, T.; Dupont, J.; Büsing, L.; Fiebelkorn, F. Acceptance of Insect-Based Food Products in Western Societies: A Systematic Review. Front. Nutr. 2022, 8, 759885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  22. Turck, D.; Castenmiller, J.; De Henauw, S.; Hirsch-Ernst, K.I.; Maciuk, A.; Mangelsdorf, I.; McArdle, H.J.; Naska, A.; Pelaez, C.; Pentieva, K.; et al. Safety of Frozen and Dried Formulations from Whole House Crickets (Acheta domesticus) as a Novel Food Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Bawa, M.; Songsermpong, S.; Kaewtapee, C.; Chanput, W. Effect of Diet on the Growth Performance, Feed Conversion, and Nutrient Content of the House Cricket. J. Insect Sci. 2020, 20, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Aleman, R.S.; Marcia, J.; Pournaki, S.K.; Borrás-Linares, I.; Lozano-Sanchez, J.; Fernandez, I.M. Formulation of Protein-Rich Chocolate Chip Cookies Using Cricket (Acheta domesticus) Powder. Foods 2022, 11, 3275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Vadboncoeur, É.; Deschamps, M.-H.; Bertram, S.M.; MacMillan, H.A. Temperature Outweighs Diet in Shaping Developmental Performance in Two Cricket Species via Growth Delays and Physiological Limits. J. Exp. Biol. 2025, 228, jeb251472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  26. Yaemkong, S.; Incharoen, T.; Rattanachak, N.; Jongjitvimol, T. Comparative Analysis of Diet Effects on Growth Performance and Nutrient Composition in House Cricket, Acheta domestica as an Alternative Protein Source in Thailand. Cogent Food Agric. 2024, 10, 2339543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Jirukkakul, N.; Phoolklang, A. Using Dried Crickets as a Nutrients and Bioactive Compounds Source in Crispy Vegetable Chips. Foods 2025, 14, 1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. D’Antonio, V.; Battista, N.; Sacchetti, G.; Di Mattia, C.; Serafini, M. Functional Properties of Edible Insects: A Systematic Review. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2023, 36, 98–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  29. Farkas, V.I.; Máté, M.; Takács, K.; Jánosi, A. The House Cricket (Acheta domesticus Linnaeus) in Food Industry: Farming, Technological Challenges, and Sustainability Considerations. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 9494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. European Comission. Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council—Of 25 November 2015—On Novel Foods, Amending Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1852/2001. Off. J. Eur. Union 2015, 327, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  31. European Comission. Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the Hygiene of Foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union 2004, 139, 1–54. [Google Scholar]
  32. Parlamento Europeu e Conselho da União Europeia. Regulamento (UE) N. o 1169/2011; Parlamento Europeu e Conselho da União Europeia: Brussels, Belgium, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  33. German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR); National Reference Laboratory for Animal protein in Feed; NRL-AP; Garino, C.; Zagon, J.; Braeuning, A. Insects in Food and Feed–Allergenicity Risk Assessment and Analytical Detection. EFSA J. 2019, 17, e170907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Meijer, N.; Safitri, R.A.; Tao, W.; Hoek-Van Den Hil, E.F. Review: European Union Legislation and Regulatory Framework for Edible Insect Production–Safety Issues. Animal 2025, 19, 101468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. EFSA Scientific Committee. Risk Profile Related to Production and Consumption of Insects as Food and Feed. EFSA J. 2015, 13, 4257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Lähteenmäki-Uutela, A.; Marimuthu, S.B.; Meijer, N. Regulations on Insects as Food and Feed: A Global Comparison. J. Insects Food Feed 2021, 7, 849–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. ACFS—National Bureau of Agricultural Commodity and Food Standards Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperative Good Agricultural Pratices for Cricket Farming. Available online: https://e-book.acfs.go.th/backend/uploads/PDF/f84ce5245bd541a92daead7f8b14835d.pdf (accessed on 12 July 2026).
  38. Grabowski, N.T.; Tchibozo, S.; Abdulmawjood, A.; Acheuk, F.; M’Saad Guerfali, M.; Sayed, W.A.A.; Plötz, M. Edible Insects in Africa in Terms of Food, Wildlife Resource, and Pest Management Legislation. Foods 2020, 9, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  39. Singapore Food Agency Import of Insects and Insect Products as Food. Available online: https://www.sfa.gov.sg/regulatory-standards-frameworks-guidelines/insect-regulatory-framework/insect-regulatory-framework (accessed on 12 July 2026).
  40. Szelei, J.; Woodring, J.; Goettel, M.S.; Duke, G.; Jousset, F.-X.; Liu, K.Y.; Zadori, Z.; Li, Y.; Styer, E.; Boucias, D.G.; et al. Susceptibility of North-American and European Crickets to Acheta domesticus Densovirus (AdDNV) and Associated Epizootics. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2011, 106, 394–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  41. Gonçalves, C.; Chavez, K.; Jorge, R. Entomofagia-consumo atual e potencial de futuro. Acta Port. Nutr. 2022, 29, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Oonincx, D.G.A.B.; Van Itterbeeck, J.; Heetkamp, M.J.W.; Van Den Brand, H.; Van Loon, J.J.A.; Van Huis, A. An Exploration on Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Production by Insect Species Suitable for Animal or Human Consumption. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e14445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  43. Cunha, N.; Lopes De Andrade, V.; Macedo, A.; Ruivo, P.; Lima, G. Methods of Protein Extraction from House Crickets (Acheta domesticus) for Food Purposes. Foods 2024, 14, 1164. [Google Scholar]
  44. Cholleti, H.; Vaga, M.; Jansson, A.; Blomström, A.L.; Berg, M. House Crickets (Othroptera: Gryllidae: Acheta domesticus) Reared in Small-Scale Laboratory Conditions Harbour Limited Viral Flora. J. Insects Food Feed 2022, 8, 1149–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Takacs, J.; Bryon, A.; Jensen, A.B.; Van Loon, J.J.A.V.; Ros, V.I.D. Effects of Temperature and Density on House Cricket Survival and Growth and on the Prevalence of Acheta domesticus Densovirus. Insects 2023, 14, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  46. Maciel-Vergara, G.; Jensen, A.B.; Lecocq, A.; Eilenberg, J. Diseases in Edible Insect Rearing Systems. J. Insects Food Feed 2021, 7, 621–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Reis, J.; Oliveira, M.; Neves, A. Efeitos Do Uso de Subprodutos Hortofrutícolas e Farinha de Peixe Na Qualidade de Pó de Inseto Comestível. 2024.
  48. Ajdini, B.; Biancarosa, I.; Cardinaletti, G.; Illuminati, S.; Annibaldi, A.; Girolametti, F.; Fanelli, M.; Tulli, F.; Pinto, T.; Truzzi, C. Modulating the Nutritional Value of Acheta domesticus (House Cricket) through the Eco-Sustainable Ascophyllum Nodosum Dietary Supplementation. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2025, 140, 107263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. European Comission. Regulation (EC) No 767/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the Placing on the Market and Use of Feed, Amending European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 and Repealing Council Directive 79/373/EEC, Commission Directive 80/511/EEC, Council Directives 82/471/EEC, 83/228/EEC, 93/74/EEC, 93/113/EC and 96/25/EC and Commission Decision 2004/217/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union 2009, 229, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  50. European Comission. Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 Laying down Health Rules as Regards Animal by-Products and Derived Products Not Intended for Human Consumption and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (Animal by-Products Regulation). Off. J. Eur. Union 2009, 300, 1–42. [Google Scholar]
  51. European Comission. Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 of 25 February 2011 Implementing Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying down Health Rules as Regards Animal by-Products and Derived Products Not Intended for Human Consumption and Implementing Council Directive 97/78/EC as Regards Certain Samples and Items Exempt from Veterinary Checks at the Border under That Directive Text with EEA Relevance. Off. J. Eur. Union 2011, 54, 1–254. [Google Scholar]
  52. IPIFF for European Union Guide on Good Hygiene Practices. 2022. Available online: https://ipiff.org/good-hygiene-practices/ (accessed on 12 July 2026).
  53. Oonincx, D.G.A.B.; Van Broekhoven, S.; Van Huis, A.; Van Loon, J.J.A. Feed Conversion, Survival and Development, and Composition of Four Insect Species on Diets Composed of Food By-Products. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  54. Imathiu, S. Benefits and Food Safety Concerns Associated with Consumption of Edible Insects. NFS J. 2020, 18, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Singh, Y.; Cullere, M.; Kovitvadhi, A.; Chundang, P.; Dalle Zotte, A. Effect of Different Killing Methods on Physicochemical Traits, Nutritional Characteristics, in Vitro Human Digestibility and Oxidative Stability during Storage of the House Cricket (Acheta domesticus L.). Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 65, 102444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Hlongwane, Z.T.; Slotow, R.; Munyai, T.C. Nutritional Composition of Edible Insects Consumed in Africa: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  57. Marzoli, F.; Tata, A.; Zacometti, C.; Malabusini, S.; Jucker, C.; Piro, R.; Ricci, A.; Belluco, S. Microbial and Chemical Stability of Acheta domesticus Powder during One Year Storage Period at Room Temperature. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023, 7, 1179088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Orkusz, A.; Dymińska, L.; Prescha, A. Assessment of Changes in the Fat Profile of House Cricket Flour during 12 Months of Storage in Various Conditions. Foods 2024, 13, 2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  59. Pippinato, L.; Gasco, L.; Di Vita, G.; Mancuso, T. Current Scenario in the European Edible-Insect Industry: A Preliminary Study. J. Insects Food Feed 2020, 6, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Hansen, L.S.; Laursen, S.F.; Bahrndorff, S.; Sørensen, J.G.; Sahana, G.; Kristensen, T.N.; Nielsen, H.M. The Unpaved Road towards Efficient Selective Breeding in Insects for Food and Feed—A Review. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2025, 173, 498–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Lecocq, A.; Jensen, A.B. Review: Insect Diseases in Mass Production Systems: Risks, Prevention, Diagnostics and Management. Animal 2025, 19, 101559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  62. Bertola, M.; Mutinelli, F. A Systematic Review on Viruses in Mass-Reared Edible Insect Species. Viruses 2021, 13, 2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  63. De Miranda, J.R.; Granberg, F.; Low, M.; Onorati, P.; Semberg, E.; Jansson, A.; Berggren, Å. Virus Diversity and Loads in Crickets Reared for Feed: Implications for Husbandry. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 642085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  64. Perez-Santaescolastica, C.; De Pril, I.; Van De Voorde, I.; Fraeye, I. Fatty Acid and Amino Acid Profiles of Seven Edible Insects: Focus on Lipid Class Composition and Protein Conversion Factors. Foods 2023, 12, 4090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  65. Espinosa-Solís, A.; Velázquez-Segura, A.; Lara-Rodríguez, C.; Martínez, L.M.; Chuck-Hernández, C.; Rodríguez-Sifuentes, L. Optimizing Chitin Extraction and Chitosan Production from House Cricket Flour. Processes 2024, 12, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Loypimai, P.; Moontree, T.; Pranil, T.; Moongngarm, A. A Comparative Study of Nutritional Components of Gryllus Bimaculatus and Acheta domesticus Cricket Powder Prepared Using Different Drying Methods. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2024, 18, 3974–3983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Payne, C.L.R.; Scarborough, P.; Rayner, M.; Nonaka, K. A Systematic Review of Nutrient Composition Data Available for Twelve Commercially Available Edible Insects, and Comparison with Reference Values. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 47, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Ververis, E.; Boué, G.; Poulsen, M.; Pires, S.M.; Niforou, A.; Thomsen, S.T.; Tesson, V.; Federighi, M.; Naska, A. A Systematic Review of the Nutrient Composition, Microbiological and Toxicological Profile of Acheta domesticus (House Cricket). J. Food Compos. Anal. 2022, 114, 104859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Kamau, E.; Mutungi, C.; Kinyuru, J.; Imathiu, S.; Tanga, C.; Affognon, H.; Ekesi, S.; Nakimbugwe, D.; Fiaboe, K.K.M. Effect of Packaging Material, Storage Temperature and Duration on the Quality of Semi-Processed Adult House Cricket Meal. J. Food Res. 2017, 7, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Summart, R.; Imsoonthornruksa, S.; Yongsawatdigul, J.; Ketudat-Cairns, M.; Udomsil, N. Characterization and Molecular Docking of Tetrapeptides with Cellular Antioxidant and ACE Inhibitory Properties from Cricket (Acheta domesticus) Protein Hydrolysate. Heliyon 2024, 10, e35156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  71. Sangartit, W.; Suwannachot, P.; Thawornchinsombut, S.; Jan-On, G.; Boonla, O.; Senaphan, K. House Cricket Protein Hydrolysates Alleviate Hypertension, Vascular Dysfunction, and Oxidative Stress in Nitric Oxide-Deficient Hypertensive Rats. Vet. World 2024, 17, 2104–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  72. Cruz-López, S.O.; Escalona-Buendía, H.B.; Martinez-Arellano, I.; Domínguez-Soberanes, J.; Alvarez-Cisneros, Y.M. Physicochemical and Techno-Functional Characterization of Soluble Proteins Extracted by Ultrasound from the Cricket Acheta domesticus. Heliyon 2024, 10, e40718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  73. Fernandez-Cassi, X.; Söderqvist, K.; Bakeeva, A.; Vaga, M.; Dicksved, J.; Vagsholm, I.; Jansson, A.; Boqvist, S. Microbial Communities and Food Safety Aspects of Crickets (Acheta domesticus) Reared under Controlled Conditions. J. Insects Food Feed 2020, 6, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  74. SLU, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Sweden; Fernandez-Cassi, X.; Supeanu, A.; Jansson, A.; Boqvist, S.; Vagsholm, I. Novel Foods: A Risk Profile for the House Cricket (Acheta domesticus). EFSA J. 2018, 16, e16082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  75. Mishyna, M.; Keppler, J.K.; Chen, J. Techno-Functional Properties of Edible Insect Proteins and Effects of Processing. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 56, 101508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  76. Ammar, M.; Puleo, S.; Miele, N.A.; Câmara, N.; Monaco, R.D. Application of Acheta domesticus Powder in Food: Impact on Sensory, Rheological, and Functional Properties. Appl. Food Res. 2026, 6, 101585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  77. Lisboa, H.M.; Andrade, R.; Lima, J.; Batista, L.; Costa, M.E.; Sarinho, A.; Pasquali, M.B. Harnessing Insects as Novel Food Ingredients: Nutritional, Functional, and Processing Perspectives. Insects 2025, 16, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  78. Aleknavičius, D.; Lukša, J.; Strazdaitė-Žielienė, Ž.; Servienė, E. The Bacterial Microbiota of Edible Insects Acheta domesticus and Gryllus Assimilis Revealed by High Content Analysis. Foods 2022, 11, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  79. Fröhling, A.; Bußler, S.; Durek, J.; Schlüter, O.K. Thermal Impact on the Culturable Microbial Diversity Along the Processing Chain of Flour From Crickets (Acheta domesticus). Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  80. Galli, V.; Venturi, M.; Pini, N.; Granchi, L. Technological Feature Assessment of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Cricket Powder’s Spontaneous Fermentation as Potential Starters for Cricket-Wheat Bread Production. Foods 2020, 9, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  81. Turck, D.; Castenmiller, J.; De Henauw, S.; Hirsch-Ernst, K.I.; Maciuk, A.; Mangelsdorf, I.; McArdle, H.J.; Naska, A.; Pentieva, K.; Siani, A.; et al. Safety of Acheta domesticus Powder as a Novel Food Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2024, 22, e8919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  82. Lucas-González, R.; Fernández-López, J.; Pérez-Álvarez, J.A.; Viuda-Martos, M. Effect of Drying Processes in the Chemical, Physico-Chemical, Techno-Functional and Antioxidant Properties of Flours Obtained from House Cricket (Acheta domesticus). Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2019, 245, 1451–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  83. Gan, J.; Zhao, M.; He, Z.; Sun, L.; Li, X.; Feng, Y. The Effects of Antioxidants and Packaging Methods on Inhibiting Lipid Oxidation in Deep Fried Crickets (Gryllus Bimaculatus) during Storage. Foods 2022, 11, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  84. Arfaoui, L. Dietary Plant Polyphenols: Effects of Food Processing on Their Content and Bioavailability. Molecules 2021, 26, 2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  85. van Huis, A. Edible Insects: Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security; FAO Forestry Paper; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2013; ISBN 978-92-5-107595-1. [Google Scholar]
  86. Rehman, N.; Ogrinc, N. Consumer Perceptions and Acceptance of Edible Insects in Slovenia. Foods 2024, 13, 2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  87. Stull, V.J.; Finer, E.; Bergmans, R.S.; Febvre, H.P.; Longhurst, C.; Manter, D.K.; Patz, J.A.; Weir, T.L. Impact of Edible Cricket Consumption on Gut Microbiota in Healthy Adults, a Double-Blind, Randomized Crossover Trial. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  88. Aiello, D.; Barbera, M.; Bongiorno, D.; Cammarata, M.; Censi, V.; Indelicato, S.; Mazzotti, F.; Napoli, A.; Piazzese, D.; Saiano, F. Edible Insects an Alternative Nutritional Source of Bioactive Compounds: A Review. Molecules 2023, 28, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  89. Pilco-Romero, G.; Chisaguano-Tonato, A.M.; Herrera-Fontana, M.E.; Chimbo-Gándara, L.F.; Sharifi-Rad, M.; Giampieri, F.; Battino, M.; Vernaza, M.G.; Álvarez-Suárez, J.M. House Cricket (Acheta domesticus): A Review Based on Its Nutritional Composition, Quality, and Potential Uses in the Food Industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 142, 104226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. Nino, M.C.; Reddivari, L.; Ferruzzi, M.G.; Liceaga, A.M. Targeted Phenolic Characterization and Antioxidant Bioactivity of Extracts from Edible Acheta domesticus. Foods 2021, 10, 2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  91. Boonarsa, P.; Bunyatratchata, A.; Phuseerit, O.; Phonphan, N.; Chumroenphat, T.; Dechakhamphu, A.; Thammapat, P.; Katisart, T.; Siriamornpun, S. Quality Variation of House Cricket (Acheta domesticus) Powder from Thai Farms: Chemical Composition, Micronutrients, Bioactive Compounds, and Microbiological Safety. Food Chem. X 2025, 29, 102698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  92. Gomes, J.G.C.; Okano, M.T.; Antunes, S.N.; Lobo Dos Santos, H.D.C.; Ursini, E.L.; Vendrametto, O. Eco-Innovation and the Edible Insect Value Chain: A Systematic Review. Contemp. Econ. 2024, 18, 17–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  93. Balzan, S.; Fasolato, L.; Fontana, F.; Currò, S.; Novelli, E. Insect-Based Products Commercialized Online: A Snapshot of Lipid Oxidation and Mineral Content. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2024, 13, 11600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  94. Sweers, L.J.H.; Politiek, R.G.A.; Lakemond, C.M.M.; Bruins, M.E.; Boom, R.M.; Fogliano, V.; Mishyna, M.; Keppler, J.K.; Schutyser, M.A.I. Dry Fractionation for Protein Enrichment of Animal By-Products and Insects: A Review. J. Food Eng. 2022, 313, 110759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  95. Puttaraksa, P.; Kiatsiriroat, T.; Wongwuttanasatian, T.; Sundach, T.; Jaisin, C.; Mongkon, S.; Polvongsri, S. Energy–Carbon Footprint Synergy in a Temperature-Controlled Cricket Farming System Integrating Photovoltaic/Thermal and Heat Pump Technologies. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2026, 41, 104724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  96. Sánchez-Muros, M.-J.; Barroso, F.G.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Insect Meal as Renewable Source of Food for Animal Feeding: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 65, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  97. Mancini, S.; Riccioli, F.; Tzompa-Sosa, D.A.; Moruzzo, R.; Schouteten, J.J.; Liu, A.; Li, J.; Menozzi, D.; Sogari, G. Exploring the Intention to Consume Whole vs Processed Edible Insects: Insights from Traditional and Non-Traditional Entomophagy Countries. J. Agric. Food Res. 2024, 18, 101532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  98. Roberfroid, M.B. Global View on Functional Foods: European Perspectives. Br. J. Nutr. 2002, 88, S133–S138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.