Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please see attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Please improve presentation by using more direct and clear language and sentences. 

Author Response

Response to reviewer 1

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript adresses a very relevant information on niche of  four species of Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae). 

The title is very long.  The introduction in the abstracts coccupies the most part of the abstracts.  I suggested new keywords. 

In the introduction, authors must highlight the advances in the new article in relation to the one already published (Degracia, A.B.; Jiménez, J.Á.; Alvarado, A.B.; Valdespino, R.A.; Altamiranda-Saavedra, M. Evaluation of the Effect of the ENSO Cycle on the Distribution Potential of the Genus Anastrepha of Horticultural Importance in the Neotropics and Panama. Insects 2023, 14, 714. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14080714).

The methodology and results are well described. 

The discussion should include more specific works, giving a clearer idea of the differences and similarities with other studies, even if they did not use the same method. Although the work did not aim to evaluate climate change scenarios, I suggest including this information to increase the number of readers. I suggest that the authors discuss using the works below.

 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485321000985

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-019-00741-1

https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12018

https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.991923

 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105836

Highlight progress in relation to the last article published by your team.

The conclusion must be more in-depth.. The names of some of the authors are incorrect in the references.

The are more susggestions in the attached file.

 

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

response reviewer 2

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Thank you for your careful revision. I believe the paper is improved and now acceptable.

Author Response

Thank you for your finals comments

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors made all corrections.  Please, italicize Zeugodacus (line 99) and Anastrepha (line 416).

Author Response

thank you for your finals comments. Applied

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf