Next Article in Journal
Physical Functional Ability and Quantitative Assessment of the Multifidus Muscle of the Lumbar Spine in the Elderly
Previous Article in Journal
Intracranial Hemorrhage in Hospitalized Patients Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Large Cohort Analysis from a Single Center
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness at the Implantation Areas of Two Popular Bone-Anchored Distalizers—A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Retrospective Study

by
Marta Gibas-Stanek
*,
Szczepan Żabicki
,
Michał Urzędowski
and
Małgorzata Pihut
Department of Prosthodontics and Orthodontics, Dental Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Montelupich St. 4/108, 31-155 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(14), 2421; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142421
Submission received: 25 June 2023 / Revised: 18 July 2023 / Accepted: 19 July 2023 / Published: 20 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)

Abstract

Since class II malocclusion and lack of space within the dental arch due to early loss of deciduous molars is a common orthodontic problem in the Polish population, bone-anchored distalizers are becoming more and more popular. The aim of the present study was to evaluate palatal soft and hard tissue thickness using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) at the area of micro-implant placement of two appliances for maxillary first molar distalization: Beneslider and TopJet distalizer. The study data were 100 consecutively selected CBCT images (53 of men and 47 of women). Measurements of bone and mucosa thickness were performed at six locations in the palate and tested according to their correlation with sex and age. The biggest bone and mucosa thickness were recorded in the insertion site of the TopJet miniscrew. Bone thickness in all points of paramedian insertion was significantly greater in males and the mean difference was approximately 1–1.8 mm. Age correlates significantly (p < 0.05) and positively (r > 0) with the thickness of the mucosa at all points: the older the patient, the thicker the mucosa at each measurement point. Anatomical diversity of the hard palate in the population involves the need to perform bone and mucosa thickness measurements before palatal micro-implant placement.
Keywords: bone screw; maxilla; orthodontics; X-ray computed tomography bone screw; maxilla; orthodontics; X-ray computed tomography

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gibas-Stanek, M.; Żabicki, S.; Urzędowski, M.; Pihut, M. Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness at the Implantation Areas of Two Popular Bone-Anchored Distalizers—A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Retrospective Study. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 2421. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142421

AMA Style

Gibas-Stanek M, Żabicki S, Urzędowski M, Pihut M. Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness at the Implantation Areas of Two Popular Bone-Anchored Distalizers—A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Retrospective Study. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(14):2421. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142421

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gibas-Stanek, Marta, Szczepan Żabicki, Michał Urzędowski, and Małgorzata Pihut. 2023. "Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness at the Implantation Areas of Two Popular Bone-Anchored Distalizers—A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Retrospective Study" Diagnostics 13, no. 14: 2421. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142421

APA Style

Gibas-Stanek, M., Żabicki, S., Urzędowski, M., & Pihut, M. (2023). Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness at the Implantation Areas of Two Popular Bone-Anchored Distalizers—A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Retrospective Study. Diagnostics, 13(14), 2421. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142421

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop