Next Article in Journal
Prediction Method of Aeroengine Rotor Assembly Errors Based on a Novel Multi-Axis Measuring and Connecting Mechanism
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Load Inhomogeneity of Two-Tooth Difference Swing-Rod Movable Teeth Transmission System under External Excitation
Previous Article in Journal
Stability of Zeros for Sampled-Data Models with Triangle Sample and Hold Implemented by Zero-Order Hold
Previous Article in Special Issue
Functional Investigation of Geometrically Scaled Drive Components by X-in-the-Loop Testing with Scaled Prototypes
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Analysis of the Influence of Component Type and Operating Condition on the Selection of Preventive Maintenance Strategy in Multistage Industrial Machines: A Case Study

Machines 2022, 10(5), 385; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10050385
by Francisco Javier Álvarez García 1,* and David Rodríguez Salgado 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Machines 2022, 10(5), 385; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10050385
Submission received: 3 March 2022 / Revised: 11 May 2022 / Accepted: 16 May 2022 / Published: 17 May 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Why is the approach presented by the authors better than a FMECA analysis or others?

Why the authors do not follow the maintenance standards, like the KPI (EN 01534) and EN 013306?

The results and conclusions ought to be divided in two sections.

Author Response

We have just finished the review of our paper (Manuscript ID: machines-1633923) titled “Analysis of the influence of component type and operating condition on the selection of preventive maintenance strategy in multistage industrial machines. A Case Study”. We sincerely appreciate the suggestions of the reviewers. We have tried to comply all the comments, which have been used to improve the quality of the original manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The article deals with influence of component type and operating 
condition on maintenance strategy. This is related to multistage industrial machines mostly. 

The introduction provided a brief familiarization with the topic. It is well structured with enough references which are also up to date. The second part deals with Preventive programming maintenance and its improvements. From this part a methodology is presented. Here I would like to point out that  I would rename this part, since this is no proper methodology. Author only presents the other parts of the article. 

Point two is practical. A case study on multistage thermoforming machine is presented. I would maybe shorten the parts 2.1. - 2.2. where only components are listed. Why did you choose maintenance strategies studied for this MSTM are PPM and IPPM?

Final part 2.5. of the article deals with Selection of preventive maintenance strategies itself. Parameters are chosen well. The IPPM strategy seems to be the one to give better results. Conclusions are presented at the end of the article...

What is missing, is future research plans. Do authors plan to develop their strategy? Form a matrix? Use these conclusions for other machines?

Overall, acceptable  

 

 

 

 

Author Response

We have just finished the review of our paper (Manuscript ID: machines-1633923) titled “Analysis of the influence of component type and operating condition on the selection of preventive maintenance strategy in multistage industrial machines. A Case Study”. We sincerely appreciate the suggestions of the reviewers. We have tried to comply all the comments, which have been used to improve the quality of the original manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Ready to publish. Congratulations.

 

Author Response

We have just finished the review of our paper (Manuscript ID: machines-1633923) titled “Analysis of the influence of component type and operating condition on the selection of preventive maintenance strategy in multistage industrial machines. A Case Study”. We sincerely appreciate these new suggestions. We have tried to comply all the comments, which have been used to improve the quality of the original manuscript

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop