Highlights
What are the main findings?
- Constant WP* contributes to biomass overestimation under water stress.
- AquaCrop-WM improves wheat biomass and grain yield under water stress.
- Dynamic WP* adjustment via Kssto captures physiological water-stress responses.
- The stress-responsive WP* formulation reduces biomass and yield overestimation.
- The calibrated Ws captures crop-specific responses to progressive water stress.
- AquaCrop-WM improves prediction accuracy without modifying AquaCrop’s water balance.
Abstract
Accurately simulating wheat production under water-limited conditions remains a major challenge for AquaCrop and other models used in irrigation management. In this study, the hypothesis of variable normalized water productivity (WP*) was evaluated for winter wheat under water-stress conditions. The original AquaCrop (AquaCrop-OS) model was applied across five irrigation treatments over two growing seasons. The AquaCrop-OS model successfully simulated canopy cover dynamics and soil water content, the latter with acceptable accuracy. However, consistently overestimated aboveground biomass and grain yield under moderate to severe water stress, with normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) values of 15.0% and 16.0%, respectively. The enhanced model version, AquaCrop-WM, which incorporates a water stress-responsive adjustment to WP*, substantially reduces these discrepancies, lowering NRMSE to 7.9% for biomass and 8.7% for grain yield. In this improved model, a dimensionless coefficient (Ws) is used to control the sensitivity of water productivity to stomatal stress. The Ws value for winter wheat was estimated to equal 3.63, which is lower than the previously reported value for maize (5.32), indicating winter wheat’s moderate sensitivity to progressive water limitation.