1. Introduction
Earthworms (
Lumbricidae) are listed among the most important soil-dwelling invertebrates [
1]. They constitute a major component of soil fauna communities in most ecosystems [
2]. The role of earthworms in soil fertility has been known for over a century [
2]. So far, a great number of studies have been undertaken which highlight direct and indirect effects of their activity on biotic and abiotic soil properties, and, consequently, plant productivity. Due to their services, earthworms are referred to as ecosystem engineers [
3,
4] and indicators of biological soil health [
5,
6].
The occurrence, distribution, and abundance of earthworms can be affected by a range of environmental factors, including climate, soil conditions, food sources, metal concentration, and predator pressure [
5]. In addition, in agroecosystems, agricultural practices such as irrigation, tillage, lime application, fertilizer and pesticide use, drainage, crop rotation, and cover crops influence earthworm abundance and activity [
7] because they change one or more of the factors listed above [
5,
8].
Despite potential soil pollution [
9], increased use of inorganic fertilizers to enhance crop yields is a common practice in modern agriculture. Both beneficial and harmful effects of inorganic fertilizers on earthworm populations have been observed [
10]. The positive effect is believed to be an indirect consequence of increased crop biomass production and the resulting increase in organic residues [
11]. On the other hand, the toxic effects of inorganic fertilizers on earthworms, especially upon direct contact, have been reported [
12,
13].
Modern European agriculture faces a shortage of primary phosphorus (P) sources. Phosphate rock was included in the EU list of critical resources in 2014 [
14]. A circular P economy, including recycling, seems to be a necessity in this part of the world. Inorganic and organic waste are often a source of nutrients in fertilizers [
15,
16]. As has been proved in numerous scientific centers, phosphate rocks can be replaced with P-rich secondary raw materials [
17,
18,
19]. Municipal and industrial byproducts such as sewage sludge ash (SSA), animal bones, and blood may constitute the basis for alternative fertilizers [
19]. An innovative approach, initiated to activate P from raw material, is the inclusion of phosphorus-solubilizing microbes (PSM) into waste-based preparations [
20]. The use of recycled fertilizers is expected not only to provide satisfactory yields in terms of quantity [
21,
22] and quality, but also not to cause negative changes in the soil environment. Concerning the latter, it should be taken into account that the introduction of nutrient carrier and PSM to the soil could alter soil properties both directly (nutrient content and availability, pH, possible presence of toxic elements) and indirectly (e.g., through microbial activity modification or plant growth stimulation) [
23]. Changes in habitat conditions could affect earthworm populations. It is also crucial to be aware that the consequences of recycled fertilizer use, while being invisible in the short term, may lead to significant environmental changes in the long term [
24,
25].
The aim of this research has been to determine the impact of the fertilizers produced from SSA and animal blood on earthworm occurrence in the soil. The recycled fertilizer (RecF) and biofertilizer (RecB), i.e., RecF activated by Bacillus megaterium bacteria (PSM) were assessed against superphosphate, a commercial phosphorus fertilizer. It was hypothesized that the impact of the recycled fertilizers on soil earthworms would be similar or more favorable/less harmful than that of the traditional P fertilizer.
3. Results and Discussion
Both in 2016 and 2017, thermal and rain conditions in July and early August promoted earthworm presence in the 0–0.4 m soil layer. Having found convenient habitat moisture at this level of the soil profile, the individuals of
Lumbricidae did not enter into diapause or migrate deeper into the soil seeking better conditions [
30]. The density of earthworms found in the studied soil columns ranged from 6 to 44 individuals and the biomass from 1.1 to 21.5 g per m
2 (
Table 6). These values are similar to those presented by Tiwari [
33] from a sandy loam Oxisol in India, but smaller than the values reported by other authors from different arable soils in Poland [
4] and Slovakia [
34]. The abovementioned differences may have been caused by different timing of sampling, which did not correspond to the periods of the highest earthworm activity (spring and autumn) indicated in the literature [
4,
34]. In 2016, the average earthworm biomass was relatively higher than in 2017 due to a greater share of adult individuals in the community.
In all experiments, only two earthworm species were identified, i.e.,
Aporrectodea caliginosa and
Aporrectodea rosea (
Figure 1), which is hardly surprising. These species are among the most common in Poland [
31] and Europe [
35], and they were the only ones recorded by Kanianska et al. [
34] in some study sites in Slovakia. In 2016, mainly adult earthworms were noted, and on average,
A. caliginosa and
A. rosea occurred in similar proportions (42% and 39%, respectively). In 2017, among the earthworm individuals found after spring wheat harvest, juvenile forms dominated, often constituting 100% of the community. Adults were found sporadically. A large proportion of juvenile forms (mostly over 50%) were also recorded in the soil after the winter wheat harvest. In this experiment,
A. rosea was predominant. A high number of juvenile individuals is often thought to be an indicator of suitable conditions for earthworm development [
29,
36]. A dominance of juvenile forms over adult earthworms has also been noticed by other authors [
4,
34].
In none of the conducted experiments did the earthworm density and biomass depend on the type of P fertilizers used or their doses (
Table 6). Moreover, earthworm abundance (density and biomass) under no P treatment did not differ from that under fertilizers. In addition, no evident link between the species composition and structure of earthworms and the applied P fertilization was observed (
Figure 1).
To compare, in the study by Tiwari [
33] conducted in an Oxisol (India), the single superphosphate applied at P dose of 25 kg ha
–1 did not change the earthworm density and biomass in comparison to control treatment (no fertilizer). An increase in the number and biomass of earthworms with the addition of superphosphate to pastures in Australia and New Zealand was reported [
37]; however, the authors argued that P fertilizer led to an increase in plant production in these ecosystems and, hence, available food. In contrast, in other studies [
34,
38,
39], a negative relationship between earthworm biomass and P content in soil was found. Some authors proved that inorganic fertilizers, including superphosphate, can be toxic to earthworms upon direct contact [
12,
13].
In the current study, the SSA is the main raw material for the fertilizers produced, and one that may raise concerns about the heavy metal presence [
18]. The issue of toxic element occurrence is key since Khan et al. [
40], based on a pot experiment, claimed that the high content of heavy metals in the tested fiber and chemical industry sludge ashes was the reason for the decrease in the number of adults, juveniles, cocoons, and fresh weight of the earthworm
Pheretima posthuma found four months after the waste application. Using animal blood as a fertilizer for organic farming [
41,
42] and a fertilizer binder [
43] was recommended. The content of potentially toxic elements in fertilizers tested in the current study was low (
Table 1), and the fertilizer doses used were not excessive. According to other research, metals such as copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and iron (Fe), which are contained in RecF and RecB fertilizers, may also be toxic to earthworms [
13,
44,
45], although they play the role of microelements for plants. Neuhauser et al. [
44] proved that Cu and Zn were more toxic to
Eisenia fetida than cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb). Toxicity of aluminum (Al) to earthworms was reported as well [
46]. Additional reflections (and caution) should also be prompted by studies on long-term use of sewage sludge documenting the negative impact of metal accumulation in the soil on soil microorganisms [
24,
25,
47].
To date, only a few studies have examined the effect of SSA-based fertilizers on earthworms. Rastetter et al. [
48] ecotoxicologically analyzed three crystallization products and five ash products of recovered phosphate-containing materials, obtained from treated sewage sludge, sludge liquors or sludge ashes from municipal wastewater treatment plants in Europe. The phosphate recyclates were compared with a conventional phosphate fertilizer (triple superphosphate). The avoidance test with the earthworm
Eisenia fetida was used to determine the effects of chemicals on behavior of earthworms. The authors concluded that relevant agronomical application amounts of all phosphate recyclates and triple superphosphate might not have an acute toxic effect on the soil invertebrates. In contrast to endogeic species found in the current study,
E. fetida is epigeic, and some research has suggested that the sensitivity of ecologically different earthworm species to chemicals/pollutants may vary [
49,
50]. The earlier field studies by Jastrzębska et al. [
23,
51,
52,
53] showed that suspension and granular fertilizers from SSA and/or animal bones with a low content of toxic elements and applied in recommended doses did not alter the abundance (density and biomass), species composition, and structure of soil earthworms. In the cited studies, only endogeic species were found, both in fertilized and nonfertilized soil. The current study is in line with the above results. It is also worth highlighting that the peculiar impact of PSM included in biofertilizer on earthworms was not noticed. The same results were obtained by Jastrzębska et al. [
53] when fertilizer and biofertilizer from SSA and animal bones were compared. It can thus be concluded that PSM introduced into the soil in the amounts required for biofertilizers do not significantly alter the earthworm habitat conditions.
In the presented experiments, chemical plant protection was used. This may create the assumption that pesticides affected earthworms and masked the effects of fertilizers. However, in the earlier study with SSA-based suspension fertilizer, Jastrzębska et al. [
23] did not observe the effect of pesticides (applied at recommended doses) on earthworms, nor the interaction between phosphorus fertilizations and plant protection (no plant protection vs. chemical plant protection). Considering the abovementioned results, we believe that this phenomenon did not occur in the presented study either.