Skip to Content
PolymersPolymers
  • Article
  • Open Access

24 October 2026

15 Pages

Asphaltenes as Tackifiers for Hot-Melt Adhesives Based on Polyamide-12

,
and
A.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences, 29 Leninsky Prospect, 119991 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

The potential of petroleum asphaltenes as novel, low-concentration tackifying agents in polyamide-12-based hot-melt adhesives was systematically investigated. The structural, rheological, thermophysical, mechanical, and adhesive properties of polyamide blends containing 5 to 20 wt% asphaltenes were comprehensively evaluated. A maximum twofold increase in lap-shear adhesion to steel was achieved at an optimal loading of 5 wt%, with the bond strength rising from 3.2 MPa to 6.9 MPa. This enhancement is attributed to the surfactant-like nature of asphaltenes. The peripheral aliphatic moieties of asphaltenes enable their partial dissolution within the polyamide matrix, enhancing interfacial affinity with the steel substrate without requiring the high loadings typical of conventional resin tackifiers. Mechanically, the tensile strength of the blends remained comparable to neat polyamide up to 10 wt%, whereas at 20 wt%, undissolved asphaltene aggregates acted as stress concentrators, reducing the cohesive strength from 42 MPa to 27 MPa. Rheologically, while the zero-shear viscosity increased only moderately (by a factor of 1.1–1.5), the absence of yield stress and a pronounced viscosity decrease at high shear stresses indicated excellent processability. Furthermore, the incorporation of asphaltenes caused no systematic changes in melting or crystallization temperatures, with the relative degree of crystallinity decreasing by only 0.3–6.4%. Ultimately, this work demonstrates that asphaltenes serve as highly efficient, sustainable tackifiers for polyamide hot-melts, offering a novel pathway for the valorization of heavy crude oil by-products.

1. Introduction

A hot-melt adhesive is a solvent-free, specialized fusible composition based on a thermoplastic polymer. It is designed to form adhesive bonds between various materials, including metals, at relatively low temperatures and to maintain the formed bond after cooling [1,2]. Hot-melt adhesives have found wide application in various industries, particularly in the woodworking and furniture industries, electronics, and other fields [3,4]. There are a number of advantages of hot-melt adhesives, such as fast bonding, environmental friendliness, cost-effectiveness, reduced fire hazard, versatility, moisture resistance, long shelf life, as well as excellent strength and adhesion properties [5]. Hot-melt adhesives usually consist of a polymer base and a tackifier [6,7,8]. The most widely used polymer bases for these adhesives are ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers [1,9,10], polyisoprene [11], polyisobutylene [12,13], polyethylene [14], polybutene [15], polyvinyl acetate [16], polylactide [17], polyesteramide [18], polyurethane [19], polyester/polyamide blends [20], and others. The polymer base constitutes more than half of the adhesive composition and is responsible for its strength, elasticity, viscosity, and adhesion. Resins are the second component of adhesives, constituting about 30 wt%. They include both natural (rosins, terpenes, and their derivatives) [21] and synthetic resins (petroleum-based, terpene–phenolic, and indene–coumarone) [22,23,24,25]. Resins are used to enhance adhesive bonding, improve the wetting of the surfaces being joined, and reduce viscosity [26]. Additionally, hot-melt adhesives contain various additives (around 20 wt%), such as waxes [1,27], plasticizers [28], colorants, fillers, antioxidants [29], and others. Waxes are primarily added to slowly crystallizing polymer bases to shorten the open time and accelerate setting upon cooling, while also reducing melt viscosity, improving substrate wetting, and lowering formulation costs. Conversely, plasticizers are often introduced into fast-crystallizing or highly rigid polymer formulations to improve processability, enhance operational elasticity, and reduce overall material costs. Plasticizers facilitate the dispersion of ingredients, lower the molding temperature of the compositions, and improve the low-temperature resistance of polymers, although they may sometimes reduce their heat resistance. Certain plasticizers can also enhance the flame, light, and thermal stability of polymers [30]. The most common plasticizers are esters, such as dioctyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate, dioctyl adipate, dioctyl sebacate, trioctyl phosphate, and trimellitates [31,32]. Chlorinated paraffins, mineral and vegetable oils, epoxidized soybean oil, and other liquids are also used [33].
Aliphatic polyamides (nylons) are specialized, fast-crystallizing, and rigid polymers with outstanding properties dictated by their specific monomeric composition [34]. These materials exhibit remarkable characteristics: they possess high strength, are resistant to a wide range of chemicals, withstand temperatures of up to 140 °C and higher, and provide excellent thermal and electrical insulation. Moreover, polyamides are highly compatible with a wide variety of fillers, which opens up endless possibilities for developing composite materials and modified plastics with precisely tailored properties [35].
The use of aliphatic polyamides as hot-melt adhesives was first reported in 1959 [36]. Due to their elevated softening points and excellent bond strength, polyamides are widely utilized in this field [37]. For instance, Chun et al. demonstrated that a terpolymer of nylon 6, nylon 66, and nylon 12, or a blend of nylons rather than a nylon homopolymer, serves as a suitable base resin for hot-melt adhesives, since the disruption of polymer chain regularity reduces crystallinity, leading to a lower melting point and melt viscosity [38]. Furthermore, the rheological properties of polyamide-based hot-melt adhesives can be controlled by incorporating terpene resins, butylbenzyl phthalate, and paraffin wax. Zhao et al. investigated hot-melt adhesives prepared by blending nylon 12 and bamboo flour at a weight ratio of 75/25, followed by selective laser sintering, demonstrating that their mechanical properties increased with the decrease in layer thickness [39]. Chen et al. studied the influence of the intrinsic viscosity of polyesteramides on their rheological, thermophysical, mechanical, and adhesive properties [18]. The results showed that the melt viscosity, tensile strength, elongation at break, and lap shear strength of the polyesteramides rose with increasing intrinsic viscosity, whereas their softening temperature, glass transition temperature, and hardness remained virtually unchanged as the intrinsic viscosity increased within a certain range.
A modern approach to polymer modification involves the increasing use of natural and industrial waste, notably coal- or petroleum-based asphaltenes [40]. Petroleum asphaltenes are constituents of heavy crude oil [41], contributing to its high viscosity, and remain as a residue after deasphalting, a process carried out to facilitate pipeline transportation [42,43]. The rational utilization of residual asphaltenes is a significant environmental challenge, which is being addressed by employing asphaltenes in the production of emulsions [44,45], carbon fibers [46,47], and bitumen binders [48,49]. Furthermore, asphaltenes serve as inexpensive fillers that enhance the performance properties and reduce the cost of various polymer materials, including epoxy plastics [50,51,52,53], polyethylene [54,55,56,57], polypropylene [58], polyisobutylene [59], polymethyl methacrylate [60], polystyrene [61,62], and styrene copolymers [63,64,65]. Asphaltene-modified plastics can be used in many industries, with the exception of applications involving direct contact with living organisms or food, due to the potential carcinogenicity of asphaltenes [66]. Moreover, asphaltenes act as surfactants that exhibit limited solubility in the polymer matrix while enhancing the tackiness of the polymer. Thereby, asphaltenes can be used as adhesion promoters for hot-melt adhesives [64,65]. However, despite the wide range of polymers previously modified with asphaltenes, asphaltene-containing polyamide hot-melt adhesives have not yet been developed and investigated.
The novelty of this study lies in exploring asphaltenes as a highly efficient, low-concentration alternative to traditional tackifying resins. Unlike conventional modifiers, which typically require high loadings to improve wetting and tack, we propose that asphaltenes can function as highly effective tackifiers for polyamides at minimal concentrations. Driven by the structural compatibility between the aliphatic moieties of asphaltenes and the aliphatic polyamide matrix, these additives are expected to enhance interfacial affinity at low loadings. This approach potentially maximizes adhesion without significantly compromising the polymer’s crystallinity or inducing a yield stress that would restrict melt flowability.
Among aliphatic polyamides, polyamide 12 (polylaurolactam, nylon 12) stands out due to its superior resistance to moisture and harsh chemical environments. Consequently, it is widely utilized in the manufacturing of insulating materials, as well as housing, sealing, and technical components for the automotive [67], shipbuilding [68], and mechanical engineering industries [69]. Driven by these robust properties, this study utilizes polyamide 12 as the base polymer matrix. The objective is to develop and investigate asphaltene-modified polyamide 12 formulations for use as advanced hot-melt adhesives. Specifically, the critical gap this research addresses is the complete absence of data on the interaction between asphaltenes and fast-crystallizing aliphatic polyamides in hot-melt systems. The originality of this study lies in the first experimental validation of asphaltenes as highly efficient, low-concentration tackifiers that operate via a surfactant-like mechanism, fundamentally differing from the high-loading, viscosity-reducing approach of traditional resins. The overall significance of this work extends beyond formulating a new adhesive, as it provides both technological and environmental benefits by creating a high-performance material while simultaneously establishing a novel, value-added pathway for the rational utilization of heavy crude oil by-products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Polyamide 12 (PA12) produced by Anid (Yekaterinburg, Russia) with a melting point of 178 °C was used as a polymer base. Its intrinsic viscosity in m-cresol at 25 °C was 1.221 dL/g [70], corresponding to a weight-average molecular weight of 3.47 × 104 g/mol [71].
The asphaltenes were isolated from heavy crude oil from the Ashalchinskoye oilfield (η20 °C = 4.25 Pa·s, Tatarstan, Russia). According to the definition of the American Petroleum Institute, the oil density was 15.1 °API, and there was no evidence of crystallized paraffin wax. The SARA composition of the crude oil is 23.1% saturates, 45.6% aromatics, 23.8% resins, and 7.5% heptane-insoluble asphaltenes. The composition and rheological properties of the heavy crude oil were investigated in detail previously [41,43,72]. Hexamethyldisiloxane (EKOS-1, Moscow, Russia) was used as a precipitant at a volume ratio of precipitant to crude oil of 15:1. The asphaltene isolation procedure has been described in detail previously [73]. The average molecular weight of the asphaltenes was 828 g/mol, and their elemental composition was C/H/N/S = 82.3/9.1/1.6/5.8 wt%.

2.2. Blend Preparation

The asphaltene-containing polyamide blends were prepared by melt mixing using a PolyDrive twin-rotor laboratory mixer (Haake, Vreden, Germany) equipped with sigma rotors. The polyamide and asphaltenes were mixed at weight ratios of 95/5, 90/10, and 80/20 for 1 h at 180 °C and a rotational speed of 30 rpm.
Films from asphaltene/polyamide blends were formed using an HLCL-1000 laminator (Cheminstruments, West Chester Township, OH, USA) between two layers of a siliconized polyimide-based antiadhesive film at 180 °C to evaluate the strength properties and the structure of asphaltenes in polyamide. The thickness of the prepared films was 330 ± 20 μm.
Figure 1 schematically illustrates the overall workflow of the study, encompassing blend preparation and the comprehensive characterization of the resulting properties.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the experimental workflow: preparation of asphaltene/PA12 blends via melt mixing and the comprehensive characterization of their structural, thermophysical, rheological, mechanical, and adhesive properties.

2.3. Methods

The morphology of thin films was evaluated from microphotographs obtained using an MBI-1 microscope (LOMO, Saint Petersburg, Russia) equipped with a 40× objective lens and an IMX226 digital camera (Sony, Tokyo, Japan) with a 12 MP resolution and a 1/1.7-inch sensor size.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the asphaltene/polyamide films were recorded using a Rotaflex RU-200 diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a rotating copper anode and a D/Max-B horizontal wide-angle goniometer (Rigaku). The measurement range of the diffraction angles (2θ) was 3° to 90°. The measurements were performed in continuous scanning mode at a rate of 4 °C·min−1 and a step of 0.04°. The wavelength of the monochromatic radiation was 1.5405 Å.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to evaluate the effect of asphaltenes on the melting and crystallization temperatures of polyamide. The mixtures were investigated using an MDSC 2920 calorimeter (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) under an argon atmosphere. The samples were heated from room temperature to 200 °C at a rate of 10 °C·min−1, followed by cooling at the same rate.
The rheological properties of the blend melts were investigated at 180 °C using a DHR-2 rotational rheometer (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) equipped with a cone-and-plate geometry (with a plate diameter of 25 mm and a cone angle of 2°). The dependencies of the viscosity (η) on the shear stress (σ) were obtained by stepwise increasing the shear rate from 0.001 to 100 s−1. The amplitude dependencies of the storage (G′) and loss (G″) moduli were measured at an angular frequency (ω) of 6.28 rad·s−1 through a stepwise increase in the strain amplitude (γ) from 0.01 to 1000%. The frequency dependencies of the storage and loss moduli were obtained in the linear viscoelastic region of the samples by varying the angular frequency from 0.0628 to 628 rad·s−1. To ensure data reliability, each rheological measurement was independently repeated 2–3 times. The presented curves are representative, as the replicate measurements demonstrated high reproducibility with minimal variability between runs.
Tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and elongation at break were measured using dumbbell-shaped specimens die-cut from the asphaltene/polyamide films. The specimens featured a narrow parallel section width of 3 mm and a gauge length of 25 mm. The measurements were performed on a TT-1100 tensile testing machine (Cheminstruments, Fairfield, OH, USA) at 25 °C and a stretching rate of 3.8 cm/min. A minimum of seven replicate specimens were tested for each formulation, and the reported values represent the average.
For lap shear adhesion testing, two galvanized steel plates with a width of 10 mm and a thickness of 250 μm were bonded in a single-lap joint configuration using the test adhesive at 200 °C, forming an overlap area of 10 × 5 mm. The plates were pressed together under a constant load of 1 kgf for 1 min, cooled to room temperature, and subsequently unloaded. The lap shear adhesion strength was evaluated on an I1140M tensile testing machine (Tochpribor-KB LLC, Ivanovo, Russia) at a crosshead speed of 10 mm/min and 25 °C. At least five replicate joints were evaluated for each adhesive formulation, with average values reported.
Statistical analysis of the mechanical and adhesive properties was performed using Welch’s t-test (a two-sample Student’s t-test assuming unequal variances) to compare the asphaltene-modified blends with the neat polyamide-12 control.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure

The particle size and the presence of asphaltene aggregates in the modified polyamide were evaluated using transmission optical microscopy. Asphaltene-filled polyamide blends were used in the form of thin films placed between two cover glasses. When asphaltenes were added to the colorless polyamide, the blend samples acquired a yellow-brown coloration in a thin layer (Figure 2). This coloration suggests at least partial dissolution of the asphaltenes within the polymer matrix, since complete insolubility would have resulted in a colorless matrix interspersed with distinct, dark particles. The undissolved asphaltene domains observed in the polyamide are restricted to the micrometer scale, demonstrating a high degree of dispersion. Notably, no large-scale asphaltene aggregation was observed, even at high filler loadings of up to 20 wt%.
Figure 2. Microphotographs of polyamide films containing 5 (a), 10 (b), and 20 wt% (c) asphaltenes at 25 °C.
Thus, utilizing an aliphatic polymer matrix, which structurally complements the peripheral aliphatic moieties of asphaltenes [74,75], fosters strong polymer–asphaltene interactions. This inherent compatibility consequently ensures high filler dispersibility and effectively prevents the formation of aggregates within the polymer matrix.
According to the diffractograms (Figure 3), the neat polyamide is in a semicrystalline state, with characteristic reflections observed at 2θ values of 5.5°, 11.1°, and 21.3°, which correspond to the (020), (040), and (001) crystallographic planes, respectively, of the monoclinic γ-form of PA12 prepared by melt cooling [76,77,78]. The incorporation of asphaltenes leads to a noticeable decrease in the intensity of these diffraction peaks, which may be attributed to a reduction in overall crystallinity, an increase in crystal defects, a decrease in crystallite size, or changes in preferential crystal orientation relative to the sample surface [79]. At the same time, the main diffraction peak shifts from 21.3° for neat PA12 to 20.6° for the composite containing 20 wt% asphaltenes. According to Bragg’s law, this corresponds to a slight increase in the interplanar d-spacing from 0.417 nm to 0.431 nm, indicating that the presence of asphaltenes expands the polymer chain packing within the crystalline domains.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of polyamide films containing asphaltenes. The asphaltene mass content is indicated near the curves.

3.2. Thermophysical Properties

The addition of asphaltenes has a negligible effect on the melting behavior of the polyamide. In the case of the blend containing 5 wt% of asphaltenes, the endothermic peak shifts slightly to a higher-temperature region, while higher asphaltene concentrations have practically no effect on the melting temperature (Figure 4a). In other words, asphaltenes neither reduce the polyamide crystal size nor increase crystal defects. The melting temperatures (Tm) and enthalpies (ΔHm) of the blends are presented in Table 1.
Figure 4. DSC thermograms of polyamide and its blends with asphaltenes in heating (a) and cooling (b) modes. The asphaltene mass content is indicated near the curves.
Table 1. Melting and crystallization of asphaltene/polyamide blends.
The crystallization temperature of the polyamide (Tcr) remains practically unchanged upon the addition of asphaltenes (Figure 4b), although the overall crystallization enthalpy of the blends (ΔHcr) decreases slightly. Thus, it is unlikely that asphaltenes act as nucleation sites, since otherwise the crystallization temperature would have increased.
To quantitatively assess the impact of asphaltene incorporation on the crystallinity of the polyamide matrix, the relative degree of crystallinity (RDC) was calculated as follows [80]:
R D C = ( Δ H m + Δ H c r ) ( 1 − w a s p h / 100 ) ( Δ H m , P A + Δ H c r , P A ) · 100 % ,
where wasph is the asphaltene content (in wt%), while ΔHm,PA and ΔHcr,PA are the specific melting and crystallization enthalpies of the neat polyamide, respectively.
RDC calculation shows that the crystallinity degree of the polyamide decreases by 0.3–6.4% relative to its initial value (Table 1). In other words, asphaltenes have practically no effect on the polymer matrix crystallinity.
Finally, it should be noted that because both PA12 and petroleum asphaltenes exhibit high thermal stability with degradation onset temperatures well above 350 °C, thermal decomposition does not occur at typical hot-melt processing temperatures (180–200 °C). Given this substantial thermal margin, the thermophysical characterization focused exclusively on DSC and rheological measurements, which govern the critical melting, flow, and solidification behavior required for hot-melt applications.

3.3. Rheological Properties

The addition of asphaltenes increases the maximum Newtonian viscosity of polyamide by a factor of 1.1–1.5 (Figure 5). In this case, the most significant increase in viscosity is observed with the addition of 10–20 wt% of asphaltenes, when a portion of the asphaltenes forms a liquid dispersed phase (Figure 2b,c), since the test temperature exceeds the glass transition temperature of the asphaltenes (approximately 63 °C [64]). The increase in viscosity is likely due to interfacial viscoelasticity [81,82], specifically at the asphaltene–polyamide interface. Remarkably, at high shear rates and shear stresses, the viscosity of the composites is lower than that of the unfilled polymer matrix. Such behavior can be explained by the deformation of asphaltene droplets and interfacial slip at the polymer–asphaltene boundary due to their poor adhesion [83,84]. At the same time, even at high filler loadings, the flow curves of the samples are not characterized by a yield stress, which suggests the absence of an asphaltene percolation network [85,86].
Figure 5. Dependencies of viscosity on shear stress for asphaltene/polyamide blends at 180 °C. The asphaltene mass content is indicated in the legend.
The neat polyamide melt exhibits linear viscoelastic behavior up to a strain amplitude of about 50% (Figure 6), which is consistent with conventional polymer melts and solutions [87,88]. In this regime, the loss modulus (characterizing energy dissipation during deformation) exceeds the storage modulus (characterizing energy storage), indicating that the melt exhibits predominantly liquid-like behavior. The addition of asphaltenes does not significantly alter the storage modulus but reduces the loss modulus. Furthermore, this reduction in the loss modulus becomes more pronounced with increasing asphaltene content. Notably, the extent of the linear viscoelastic region remains largely unaffected by the filler addition.
Figure 6. Amplitude dependencies of storage and loss moduli for asphaltene/polyamide blends at 180 °C and an angular frequency of 6.28 rad/s. The asphaltene mass content is indicated in the legend.
The frequency dependencies of the storage and loss moduli of the neat polyamide are typical for linear polymers (Figure 7). An increase in angular frequency leads to growth in both moduli, with the storage modulus rising more rapidly than the loss modulus, in accordance with the Maxwell model [89]. The incorporation of asphaltenes induces a dual, frequency-dependent effect: it increases both dynamic moduli at low frequencies, but decreases them at high frequencies. Notably, at an asphaltene concentration of 10 wt%, the storage modulus exceeds the loss modulus at high frequencies, indicating a transition toward solid-like, rubbery behavior in the melt. The decrease in the moduli at high frequencies is likely due to the partial solubility of low-molecular-weight asphaltenes in the polymer. In this case, asphaltenes act as a plasticizer for the polyamide, reducing its viscosity and stiffness due to an increased distance between macromolecular entanglements. In contrast, at low frequencies, asphaltenes increase the dynamic moduli, with a more pronounced effect on the storage modulus, which may be attributed to the elasticity of the interfacial boundary of the emulsified asphaltenes.
Figure 7. Frequency dependence of storage and loss moduli for asphaltene/polyamide blends at 180 °C. The asphaltene mass content is indicated in the legend.
Thus, asphaltenes increase the viscosity of the polyamide melt, especially at concentrations of 10–20 wt%. This behavior fundamentally contrasts with that of conventional hot-melt adhesives modified with traditional tackifiers (e.g., hydrocarbon resins or waxes), which typically require high loadings (20–40 wt%) specifically to plasticize the matrix and reduce melt viscosity. Nevertheless, from a practical application standpoint, this moderate increase in viscosity does not critically hinder the use of these blends as hot-melt adhesives for several reasons. First, the optimal adhesive performance is achieved at a low asphaltene loading of 5 wt%, where the viscosity increase is minimal. Second, the absence of yield stress ensures that the melt retains its ability to flow and wet substrates even under low applied stresses. Third, and most importantly, at the high shear rates typical of industrial application processes (e.g., extrusion or roller coating), the viscosity of the asphaltene-containing composites is actually lower than that of the neat polyamide due to interfacial slip, which actively facilitates flow during processing. Finally, any moderate increase in low-shear viscosity can be readily compensated by a slight elevation in the application temperature, a standard and easily adjustable parameter in industrial hot-melt processing equipment.

3.4. Strength and Adhesion Properties

The tensile strength (τC) and elongation at break (δ) of the polyamide films remain comparable to those of neat PA12 at 5 and 10 wt% asphaltene loadings. However, at 20 wt%, both parameters decrease significantly (Table 2). This decline is attributed to the fact that a 20 wt% loading exceeds the solubility limit of asphaltenes in the PA12 matrix. The excess asphaltenes form a distinct, dispersed phase of undissolved aggregates (as observed in Figure 2c), which act as stress concentrators under mechanical load. These defects initiate microcracks and lead to premature cohesive failure of the bulk polymer. Regarding Young’s modulus (E), a modest 1.2- to 1.3-fold increase is observed upon the addition of asphaltenes, regardless of their concentration. In general, it can be concluded that blends containing up to 10 wt% asphaltenes are comparable in strength to the base polyamide, since their strength properties vary within the margin of measurement error.
Table 2. Strength and adhesion properties of asphaltene/polyamide blends.
The incorporation of asphaltenes into polyamide profoundly impacts the lap-shear adhesive strength of bonded joints. A maximum two-fold increase in adhesion is achieved at an optimal asphaltene loading of 5 wt%, reaching 6.9 MPa. At this concentration, the majority of the asphaltenes dissolve within the polymer matrix, likely enhancing interfacial affinity between the polyamide and the steel substrate through asphaltenes’ surfactant-like behavior [53,64]. This adhesive enhancement is maintained up to a 10 wt% asphaltene loading. However, a further increase in concentration to 20 wt% causes a sharp decline in lap-shear strength, dropping to 1.5 MPa. At this high loading, the adhesive joint presumably undergoes cohesive failure within the weakened, defect-rich polymer matrix. This bulk failure mechanism completely overrides any interfacial adhesion benefits provided by the dissolved asphaltene fraction.
Based on the structural, rheological, and adhesive data, the interaction mechanism between asphaltenes and the PA12 matrix can be described as a two-level process. First, at the bulk level, the peripheral aliphatic moieties of the asphaltene molecules exhibit structural compatibility with the aliphatic backbone of PA12. This fosters the partial solubilization of lighter, lower-molecular-weight asphaltene fractions within the amorphous regions of the polymer, as evidenced by the uniform coloration of the films, the absence of a yield stress, and the plasticizing effect observed at high frequencies. Second, at the interfacial level, asphaltenes exhibit surfactant-like behavior. Their amphiphilic nature allows the polar polyaromatic cores (rich in heteroatoms such as N and S) to interact favorably with the native metal oxide layer on the steel substrate, while their aliphatic chains remain entangled within the PA12 matrix. This dual affinity effectively bridges the polymer and the steel, enhancing interfacial adhesion without requiring high asphaltene loadings, which would otherwise compromise the cohesive strength of the polymer.

4. Conclusions

Asphaltenes serve as highly efficient tackifying modifiers for polyamide-12, significantly enhancing adhesive properties without compromising the polymer’s cohesive strength. At an optimal loading of 5 wt%, the lap-shear strength of PA12/steel joints doubles from 3.2 to 6.9 MPa, while the bulk tensile strength remains comparable to that of neat PA12 (about 42 MPa). This enhancement is effective up to 10 wt%, whereas at 20 wt%, undissolved asphaltene aggregates act as defects, degrading both the cohesive strength of the blend (down to 27 MPa) and the overall bond strength (down to 1.5 MPa). A key novelty of this approach, compared to traditional tackifiers, is that this performance is achieved at a fraction of the typical loading, and without the melt viscosity reduction upon which conventional resin-based tackification relies. Instead, the viscosity increases only moderately (by a factor of 1.1–1.5). This indicates that the adhesion enhancement is governed by the surfactant-like behavior of asphaltenes—specifically, their partial solubilization in the aliphatic matrix, which improves interfacial affinity with the steel substrate—rather than by melt dilution. Furthermore, asphaltene incorporation induces no systematic changes in the melting or crystallization temperatures, nor in the relative degree of crystallinity of PA12, which decreases by only 0.3–6.4%. Notably, no yield stress emerges in the melt, even at 20 wt% loading. Consequently, the fundamental structure and processing characteristics of the polyamide remain largely intact, as any moderate viscosity increase can be compensated, if necessary, by raising the application temperature. Practically, these asphaltene-modified polyamides are suitable as high-performance hot-melt adhesives, as well as insulating and protective coatings for steel substrates (sheets, rods, and cables) against mechanical abrasion and environmental degradation. Ultimately, this work presents a novel, value-added pathway for the rational utilization of asphaltenes, transforming a ubiquitous by-product of heavy crude oil processing into a high-performance polymeric modifier. Despite these promising findings, this study has certain limitations that should be addressed in future research. First, the current work focuses primarily on the initial adhesive and mechanical properties, without evaluating long-term durability factors such as thermal aging, ultraviolet stability, or performance under humid conditions. Second, adhesion was assessed exclusively on steel substrates under standard ambient conditions. Future research will aim to evaluate the long-term environmental stability of these adhesive joints, investigate bonding to a wider range of substrates, and provide direct molecular-level evidence of the asphaltene–steel interface using advanced surface-sensitive techniques.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.O.I.; methodology, S.O.I.; formal analysis, V.Y.M. and A.V.V.; investigation, V.Y.M. and A.V.V.; writing—original draft preparation, V.Y.M.; writing—review and editing, S.O.I.; visualization, V.Y.M. and A.V.V.; supervision, S.O.I.; project administration, S.O.I.; funding acquisition, S.O.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to I.S. Levin for his assistance in recording X-ray diffractograms in the Shared Research Center “Analytical center of deep oil processing and petrochemistry of TIPS RAS”. This research was carried out within the State Program of A.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tse, M.F. Hot melt adhesive model: Interfacial adhesion and polymer/tackifier/wax interactions. J. Adhes. 1998, 66, 61–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Li, W.; Bouzidi, L.; Narine, S.S. Current research and development status and prospect of hot-melt adhesives: A review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 7524–7532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Tout, R. A review of adhesives for furniture. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2000, 20, 269–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Halbmaier, J. Overview of hot melt adhesives application equipment for coating and laminating full-width fabrics. J. Ind. Text. 1992, 21, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Wake, W.C. Theories of adhesion and uses of adhesives: A review. Polymer 1978, 19, 291–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Benedek, I. (Ed.) Pressure-Sensitive Design, Theoretical Aspects; CRC Press, Taylor & Francis: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kalish, J.P.; Ramalingam, S.; Wamuo, O.; Vyavahare, O.; Wu, Y.; Hsu, S.L.; Paul, C.W.; Eodice, A. Role of n-alkane-based additives in hot melt adhesives. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2014, 55, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Paul, C.W. Hot-melt adhesives. MRS Bull. 2003, 28, 440–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Gibert, F.X.; Allal, A.; Marin, G.; Derail, C. Effect of the rheological properties of industrial hot-melt and pressure-sensitive adhesives on the peel behavior. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 1999, 13, 1029–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Takemoto, M.; Kajiyama, M.; Mizumachi, H.; Takemura, A.; Ono, H. Miscibility and adhesive properties of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA)-based hot-melt adhesives. I. Adhesive tensile strength. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 83, 719–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Febrianto, F.; Karliati, T.; Sahri, M.H.; Syafii, W. Trans-1.4-isoprene rubber as hot melt adhesive. J. Biol. Sci. 2006, 6, 490–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Gipson, B.L. Enhanced Polyisobutylene Modified Hot Melt Adhesive Formulation. U.S. Patent 6,930,148, 16 August 2005. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoevel, B.; Roser, A.; Fischer, C.; Martin, H. Stabilization of Hot Melt Adhesives. U.S. Patent 10,563,098, 18 February 2020. [Google Scholar]
  14. Eastman, E.F.; Fullhart, L. Polyolefin and ethylene copolymer-based hot melt adhesives. In Handbook of Adhesives; Skeist, I., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1990; pp. 408–422. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sadrtdinova, G.I.; Ovchinnikova, V.A.; Ivchenko, P.V. Isotactic copolymerization of but-1-ene with polar vinyl monomers: The effect of ω-alken-1-ol comonomer content on phase behavior, melt rheology, mechanical and adhesive properties of functionalized poly(but-1-ene)s. Polymer 2025, 339, 129133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Park, Y.J.; Joo, H.S.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, Y.K. Adhesion and rheological properties of EVA-based hot-melt adhesives. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2006, 26, 571–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Stolt, M.; Viljanmaa, M.; Södergård, A.; Törmälä, P. Blends of poly(ε-caprolactone-b-lactic acid) and poly(lactic acid) for hot-melt applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 91, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Chen, X.; Zhong, H.; Jia, L.; Ling, J.; Tang, R.; Qiao, J.; Zhang, Z. Polyesteramides used for hot melt adhesives: Synthesis and properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 81, 2696–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Cui, Y.; Hong, L.; Wang, X.; Tang, X. Evaluation of the cure kinetics of isocyanate reactive hot-melt adhesives with differential scanning calorimetry. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 89, 2708–2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Annighöfer, F. Reactive hot melts on the basis of polyester and polyamide. J. Adhes. 1987, 22, 109–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Mahendra, V. Rosin product review. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2019, 890, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Fernandes, E.G.; Lombardi, A.; Solaro, R.; Chiellini, E. Thermal characterization of three-component blends for hot-melt adhesives. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 80, 2889–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Pocius, A.V.; Dillard, D.A. (Eds.) Adhesion Science and Engineering: Surfaces, Chemistry and Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  24. Creton, C.; Papon, E. Materials science of adhesives: How to bond things together. MRS Bull. 2003, 28, 419–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit][Green Version]
  25. Ilyin, S.O.; Petrukhina, N.N.; Kostyuk, A.V.; Dzhabarov, E.G.; Filatova, M.P.; Antonov, S.V.; Maksimov, A.L. Hydrogenation of indene–coumarone resin on palladium catalysts for use in polymer adhesives. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2019, 92, 1143–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. da Silva, S.A.; Marques, C.L.; Cardozo, N.S.M. Composition and performance of styrene-isoprene-styrene (SIS) and styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) hot melt pressure sensitive adhesives. J. Adhes. 2012, 88, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Kalish, J.P.; Ramalingam, S.; Bao, H.; Hall, D.; Wamuo, O.; Hsu, S.L.; Paul, C.W.; Eodice, A.; Low, Y.G. An analysis of the role of wax in hot melt adhesives. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2015, 60, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Dana, S.F.; Nguyen, D.V.; Kochhar, J.S.; Liu, X.Y.; Kang, L. UV-curable pressure sensitive adhesive films: Effects of biocompatible plasticizers on mechanical and adhesion properties. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 6270–6281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Fomina, E.V. Hot-melt adhesives based on polyamides of dimerized fatty acids and adhesive compositions from oligoamidoamines and epoxy resins. Polym. Sci. Ser. D 2012, 5, 164–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Kunanopparat, T.; Menut, P.; Morel, M.H.; Guilbert, S. Plasticized wheat gluten reinforcement with natural fibers: Effect of thermal treatment on the fiber/matrix adhesion. Compos. Part A 2008, 39, 1787–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Semsarzadeh, M.A.; Mehrabzadeh, M.; Arabshahi, S.S. Dynamic mechanical behavior of the dioctyl phthalate plasticized polyvinyl chloride-epoxidized soya bean oil. Eur. Polym. J. 2002, 38, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Cadogan, D.F.; Howick, C.J. Plasticizers. In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology; Othmer, K., Ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bocqué, M.; Voirin, C.; Lapinte, V.; Caillol, S.; Robin, J.J. Petro-based and bio-based plasticizers: Chemical structures to plasticizing properties. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2016, 54, 11–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Francisco, D.L.; Paiva, L.B.; Aldeia, W. Advances in polyamide nanocomposites: A review. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 851–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Mark, J.E. (Ed.) Polymer Data Handbook; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  36. Aelony, D. Thermoplastic Adhesives of Polyamide Resins and Polybasic Aliphatic Acids. U.S. Patent 2,908,584, 13 October 1959. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hu, A.T. Preparation of block copolyetheramides and their properties as hot melt adhesives. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1989, 37, 1863–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Chun, Y.S.; Hong, Y.K.; Chung, K.H. Functional improvement of hot melt adhesive using polyamide type resin-(I) physical properties of adhesives. J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem. 1996, 7, 194–202. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhao, D.J.; Guo, Y.L.; Jiang, K.Y. Experimental research on selective laser sintering of bamboo flour/polyamide hot-melt adhesive blend. Key Eng. Mater. 2016, 667, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Kamkar, M.; Natale, G. A review on novel applications of asphaltenes: A valuable waste. Fuel 2021, 285, 119272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Ilyin, S.; Arinina, M.; Polyakova, M.; Bondarenko, G.; Konstantinov, I.; Kulichikhin, V.; Malkin, A. Asphaltenes in heavy crude oil: Designation, precipitation, solutions, and effects on viscosity. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2016, 147, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Ilyin, S.O.; Pakhmanova, O.A.; Kostyuk, A.V.; Antonov, S.V. Effect of the asphaltene, resin, and wax contents on the physicochemical properties and quality parameters of crude oils. Pet. Chem. 2017, 57, 1141–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Ilyin, S.O.; Strelets, L.A. Basic fundamentals of petroleum rheology and their application for the investigation of crude oils of different natures. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 268–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Havre, T.E.; Sjöblom, J. Emulsion stabilization by means of combined surfactant multilayer (D-phase) and asphaltene particles. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2003, 228, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Gorbacheva, S.N.; Ilyin, S.O. Structure, rheology and possible application of water-in-oil emulsions stabilized by asphaltenes. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 618, 126442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Qin, F.; Jiang, W.; Ni, G.; Wang, J.; Zuo, P.; Qu, S.; Shen, W. From coal-heavy oil co-refining residue to asphaltene-based functional carbon materials. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 4523–4531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Zuo, P.; Qu, S.; Shen, W. Asphaltenes: Separations, structural analysis and applications. J. Energy Chem. 2019, 34, 186–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Yadykova, A.Y.; Gorbacheva, S.N.; Ilyin, S.O. The deasphalting of heavy crude oil by silicone oil is a green method of removing heavy compounds and producing bitumen. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2023, 227, 211940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Kayukova, G.P.; Vakhin, A.V.; Mikhailova, A.N.; Petrov, S.M.; Sitnov, S.A. Road bitumen’s based on the vacuum residue of heavy oil and natural asphaltite: Part II—Physical and mechanical properties. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2017, 35, 1687–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Wu, H.; Kessler, M.R. Asphaltene: Structural characterization, molecular functionalization, and application as a low-cost filler in epoxy composites. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 24264–24273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Ding, R.; Torres, S.W.; Messman, J.; Bowen, D.E.; Bowler, N. Dynamics of model polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compound-epoxy composites: A dielectric study. Polymer 2018, 136, 6–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Han, X.; Su, W.; Gong, J.; Xi, Z.; Zhang, J.; Cai, J.; Wang, Q.; Xie, H. Microstructure and dynamic mechanical properties epoxy/asphaltene composites. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2022, 147, 2209–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Ignatenko, V.Y.; Kostyuk, A.V.; Kostina, J.V.; Bakhtin, D.S.; Makarova, V.V.; Antonov, S.V.; Ilyin, S.O. Heavy crude oil asphaltenes as a nanofiller for epoxy resin. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2020, 60, 1530–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Miao, W.; Zhu, H.; Duan, T.; Chen, H.; Wu, F.; Jiang, L.; Wang, Z. High-density polyethylene crystals with double melting peaks induced by ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene fibre. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5, 180394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  55. Siddiqui, M.N.; Redhwi, H.H.; Younas, M.; Alghizzi, A.G.; Suliman, M.H.; Achilias, D.S. Effect of natural macromolecule filler on the properties of high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Macromol. Symp. 2018, 380, 1800072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Minzagirova, A.M.; Gilmanova, A.R.; Borisova, Y.Y.; Borisov, D.N.; Galikhanov, M.F.; Ziganshin, M.A.; Yakubov, M.R. Polyolefin composition materials filled with oil asphaltenes and their functionalized derivatives. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Chem. 2020, 13, 408–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Siddiqui, M.N.; Redhwi, H.H.; Younas, M.; Hussain, S.; Achilias, D.S. Use of asphaltene filler to improve low-density polyethylene properties. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2018, 36, 756–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Siddiqui, M.N. Preparation and properties of polypropylene-asphaltene composites. Polym. Compos. 2017, 38, 1957–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Melekhina, V.Y.; Kostyuk, A.V.; Smirnova, N.M.; Ilyin, S.O. Asphaltene-stabilized polyisobutylene pressure-sensitive adhesives for ultraviolet protection and surface bonding. Materials 2023, 16, 1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  60. Siddiqui, M.N. Using asphaltenes as filler in methyl methacrylate polymer composites. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2016, 34, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Siddiqui, M.N. Studies of different properties of polystyrene-asphaltene composites. Macromol. Symp. 2015, 354, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Ignatenko, V.Y.; Antonov, S.V.; Kostyuk, A.V.; Smirnova, N.M.; Makarova, V.V.; Ilyin, S.O. Composites based on polystyrene and asphaltenes. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2019, 92, 1712–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Wu, H.; Thakur, V.K.; Kessler, M.R. Novel low-cost hybrid composites from asphaltene/SBS tri-block copolymer with improved thermal and mechanical properties. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 51, 2394–2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Ignatenko, V.Y.; Kostyuk, A.V.; Smirnova, N.M.; Antonov, S.V.; Ilyin, S.O. Asphaltenes as a tackifier for hot-melt adhesives based on the styrene-isoprene-styrene block copolymer. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2020, 60, 2224–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Ilyin, S.O.; Melekhina, V.Y.; Kostyuk, A.V.; Smirnova, N.M. Hot-melt and pressure-sensitive adhesives based on styrene-isoprene-styrene triblock copolymer, asphaltene/resin blend and naphthenic oil. Polymers 2022, 14, 4296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  66. Overton, E.B.; Sharp, W.D.; Roberts, P. Toxicity of petroleum. In Basic Environmental Toxicology, 1st ed.; Cockerham, L.G., Shane, B.S., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 133–156. [Google Scholar]
  67. Kondo, M.Y.; Montagna, L.S.; Morgado, G.F.M.; Castilho, A.L.G.; Batista, L.A.P.S.; Ribeiro, M.V. Recent advances in the use of polyamide-based materials for the automotive industry. Polímeros 2022, 32, e2022023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Thomas, S.A.; S R, S.L. Feasibility analysis of 3D printing of a boat using carbon fiber composite. SSRN Electron. J. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Dorigato, A.; Brugnara, M.; Pegoretti, A. Novel polyamide 12 based nanocomposites for industrial applications. J. Polym. Res. 2017, 24, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Ilyina, S.O.; Anokhina, T.S.; Ilyin, S.O. Non-solvent-and temperature-induced phase separations of polylaurolactam solutions in benzyl alcohol as methods for producing microfiltration membranes. Colloids Interfaces 2023, 7, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Lánská, B.; Bohdanecký, M.; Šebenda, J.; Tuzar, Z. Dilute solutions of nylon 12—II. Relationship between intrinsic viscosity and molecular weight. Eur. Polym. J. 1978, 14, 807–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Ilyin, S.O.; Arinina, M.P.; Polyakova, M.Y.; Kulichikhin, V.G.; Malkin, A.Y. Rheological comparison of light and heavy crude oils. Fuel 2016, 186, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Ilyin, S.O.; Ignatenko, V.Y.; Kostyuk, A.V.; Levin, I.S.; Bondarenko, G.N. Deasphalting of heavy crude oil by hexamethyldisiloxane: The effect of a solvent/oil ratio on the structure, composition, and properties of precipitated asphaltenes. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2022, 208, 109329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  74. Mullins, O.C. The asphaltenes. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2011, 4, 393–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  75. Mullins, O.C.; Sabbah, H.; Eyssautier, J.; Pomerantz, A.E.; Barré, L.; Andrews, A.B.; Ruiz-Morales, Y.; Mostowfi, F.; McFarlane, R.; Goual, L.; et al. Advances in asphaltene science and the Yen–Mullins model. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 3986–4003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  76. Su, D.; Yang, J.; Liu, S.; Ren, L.; Qin, S. Preparation of polyamide 12 powder for additive manufacturing applications via thermally induced phase separation. e-Polymers 2022, 22, 553–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  77. Ma, N.; Liu, W.; Ma, L.; He, S.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, A.; Huang, M.; Zhu, C. Crystal transition and thermal behavior of Nylon 12. e-Polymers 2020, 20, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Simha Martynková, G.; Slíva, A.; Kratošová, G.; Čech Barabaszová, K.; Študentová, S.; Klusák, J.; Brožová, S.; Dokoupil, T.; Holešová, S. Polyamide 12 materials study of morpho-structural changes during laser sintering of 3D printing. Polymers 2021, 13, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  79. Chua, Y.C.; Chen, L.; Lu, X. Oriented clay-induced anisotropic crystalline morphology in poly(ethylene naphthalate)/clay nanocomposites and its impact on mechanical properties. Compos. Part A 2009, 40, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  80. Melekhina, V.Y.; Vlasova, A.V.; Ilyin, S.O. Asphaltenes from heavy crude oil as ultraviolet stabilizers against polypropylene aging. Polymers 2023, 15, 4313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  81. Vinckier, I.; Minale, M.; Mewis, J.; Moldenaers, P. Rheology of semi-dilute emulsions: Viscoelastic effects caused by the interfacial tension. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1999, 150, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  82. Lucassen-Reynders, E.H. Interfacial viscoelasticity in emulsions and foams. Food Struct. 1993, 12, 1. [Google Scholar]
  83. Ilyin, S.O.; Malkin, A.Y.; Kulichikhin, V.G.; Shaulov, A.Y.; Stegno, E.V.; Berlin, A.A.; Patlazhan, S.A. Rheological properties of polyethylene/metaboric acid thermoplastic blends. Rheol. Acta 2014, 53, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. Ilyin, S.O.; Makarova, V.V.; Polyakova, M.Y.; Kulichikhin, V.G. Phase state and rheology of polyisobutylene blends with silicone resin. Rheol. Acta 2020, 59, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  85. Ilyin, S.O.; Arinina, M.P.; Malkin, A.Y.; Kulichikhin, V.G. Sol–gel transition and rheological properties of silica nanoparticle dispersions. Colloid J. 2016, 78, 608–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  86. Kostyuk, A.; Ignatenko, V.; Smirnova, N.; Brantseva, T.; Ilyin, S.; Antonov, S. Rheology and adhesive properties of filled PIB-based pressure-sensitive adhesives. I. Rheology and shear resistance. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2015, 29, 1831–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  87. Hyun, K.; Wilhelm, M.; Klein, C.O.; Cho, K.S.; Nam, J.G.; Ahn, K.H.; Lee, S.J.; Ewoldt, R.H.; McKinley, G.H. A review of nonlinear oscillatory shear tests: Analysis and application of large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS). Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 1697–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  88. Ilyin, S.O.; Malkin, A.Y.; Kulichikhin, V.G. Application of large amplitude oscillatory shear for the analysis of polymer material properties in the nonlinear mechanical behavior. Polym. Sci. Ser. A 2014, 56, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  89. Ilyin, S.O. Structural rheology in the development and study of complex polymer materials. Polymers 2024, 16, 2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  90. Yadykova, A.Y.; Ilyin, S.O. Nanocellulose-stabilized bitumen emulsions as a base for preparation of nanocomposite asphalt binders. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 313, 120896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.