Simple Summary
Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung is a rare, aggressive cancer whose diagnosis and treatment are complicated by biological heterogeneity. This review links pathological assessment and molecular testing to specific clinical decisions while distinguishing routine stage-based care from investigational strategies. Surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy remain central. Small prospective studies support further evaluation of chemo-immunotherapy, but they do not establish randomized evidence of benefit. Molecular profiling can identify uncommon actionable alterations and clinical-trial opportunities; broad SCLC-like or NSCLC-like labels are not validated treatment-selection tests. We also address limited biopsy specimens, combined tumors, management after relapse, and priorities for prospective research.
Abstract
Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with substantial biological heterogeneity. Genomic studies identify SCLC-like and NSCLC-like spectra, but genomic categories overlap incompletely with transcriptional states. Morphology remains essential: neither neuroendocrine marker positivity nor RB1 status alone distinguishes LCNEC from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This narrative review integrates diagnostic limitations, stage-based management, and the clinical implications of profiling. Surgery with systematic nodal assessment is central for resectable disease; postoperative platinum chemotherapy has greater support than perioperative immunotherapy. In advanced disease, platinum-etoposide is a commonly used reference regimen. Retrospective associations involving platinum-gemcitabine or platinum-taxanes in RB1-wild-type tumors remain hypothesis-generating and should not be extended to pemetrexed. LANCE, a durvalumab phase II trial, and preliminary NEJ044 findings provide prospective chemo-immunotherapy observations, although randomized LCNEC-specific evidence remains absent. No standard second-line regimen is established. Rare actionable drivers may support matched treatment, whereas DLL3-directed approaches and FGL1/SPINK1-associated strategies require clinical validation. We propose an evidence-qualified framework separating stage-based care, individualized molecular considerations, and clinical-trial strategies.
Keywords:
LCNEC; neuroendocrine carcinoma; lung cancer; RB1; TP53; STK11; KEAP1; immunotherapy; DLL3; precision oncology