Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Long-Term Dynamics of Three Dimensional Telomere Profiles in Circulating Tumor Cells in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Androgen-Deprivation and Radiation Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Tailor-Made Detection of Individual Phosphorylated and Non-Phosphorylated EPIYA-Motifs of Helicobacter pylori Oncoprotein CagA
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of AR/ARV7 Expression in Isolated Circulating Tumor Cells of Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (SAKK 08/14 IMPROVE Trial)
Open AccessReview
Peer-Review Record

Evolving Clinical Utility of Liquid Biopsy in Gastrointestinal Cancers

Cancers 2019, 11(8), 1164; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11081164
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Cancers 2019, 11(8), 1164; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11081164
Received: 25 July 2019 / Revised: 30 July 2019 / Accepted: 6 August 2019 / Published: 13 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Liquid Biopsy for Cancer)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have addressed my comments. Minor suggestions-

 

·        Lines 90-92: “CTCs are identified via nucleic acid amplification of mRNA for epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (EpCAM), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) or cytokeratin (16), or further immunolabeling of specific surface antigens”  -- consider reworking this sentence for accuracy

·        Line 309 typo: “on study”

·        Line 318 typo: “that CTCs”

 

Author Response

We appreciate reviewer's comments:

·        Lines 90-92: “CTCs are identified via nucleic acid amplification of mRNA for epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (EpCAM), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) or cytokeratin (16), or further immunolabeling of specific surface antigens”  -- consider reworking this sentence for accuracy

·        Line 309 typo: “on study”

·        Line 318 typo: “that CTCs”

 

All advised  edits have been made in this version of the manuscript.

 

Reviewer 2 Report

Well revised, acceptable for publication

Author Response

Thanks for the positive response. We appreciate taking time to review our manuscript.

Reviewer 3 Report

All previous concerns have been addressed.

Author Response

Thanks for the positive response. We appreciate taking time to review our manuscript.

Back to TopTop