Next Article in Journal
Relationship between Nutritional Status and Clinical Outcome in Patients Treated for Lung Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Meal Timing and Glycemic Control during Pregnancy—Is There a Link?
Previous Article in Journal
The Association between the Dietary Inflammatory Index and Thyroid Function in U.S. Adult Males
Previous Article in Special Issue
Energy Balance and Control of Body Weight: Possible Effects of Meal Timing and Circadian Rhythm Dysregulation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/nu13103331
Review Report
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Review
Peer-Review Record

Breakfast Skipping, Weight, Cardiometabolic Risk, and Nutrition Quality in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled and Intervention Longitudinal Trials

Nutrients 2021, 13(10), 3331; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103331
by Roberta Ricotti 1,†, Marina Caputo 1,2,3,†, Alice Monzani 1, Stella Pigni 2,3, Valentina Antoniotti 1, Simonetta Bellone 1 and Flavia Prodam 1,2,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nutrients 2021, 13(10), 3331; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103331
Submission received: 6 August 2021 / Revised: 10 September 2021 / Accepted: 20 September 2021 / Published: 23 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chrononutrition and Chronic Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper entitled ‘Breakfast skipping, weight, cardiometabolic risk, and nutrition quality in children and adolescents: a systematic review of randomized controlled and intervention longitudinal trials’ aims to review problem of overweight and obesity and relation of the issue with breakfast skipping. The paper is interesting and reviewed up-to-date scientific news nevertheless some points have to be improved/corrected:

  1. Abstract is too long. Please reduce this part.
  2. Keywords: max number of keywords is 10. Please remove excess of keywords
  3. Table 1. Is hard to read. There is much information but analysis of them in present form is difficult. Please rebuild the table or present information in other form.

On the whole, the paper is well prepared. Discussion is sufficient, but presented studies results should be analyse more detailed.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Ref: nutrients-1351711

Title: Breakfast skipping, weight, cardiometabolic risk, and nutrition quality in children and adolescents: a systematic review of randomized controlled and intervention longitudinal trials

Recommendation: Major review

Comments:

  1. This type of paper should cover more than 10 manuscripts. The Authors excluded 441 only based on the title. I would recommend to expand the paper and to thoroughly study the subject of rejected papers.
  2. In my opinion, nicely described and informative schemes would be an additional value.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

Thank you for manuscript improvement in accordance with my suggestions. Present form of the paper is more readable and informative. I accept the paper to publish.

Reviewer 2 Report

In my opinion (after small changes after reviews), the paper is ready for publication.

Back to TopTop