Next Article in Journal
Which Is More Concerning for Accounting Professionals-Personal Risk or Professional Risk?
Previous Article in Journal
Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Regulatory Strategy of Third-Party Environmental Pollution Management
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Influence of Perceived Value on Repurchase Intention of Green Agricultural Products: From the Perspective of Multi-Group Analysis

Sustainability 2022, 14(22), 15451; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215451
by Anxin Xu, Chenwen Wei, Manhua Zheng *, Lili Sun * and Decong Tang
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Sustainability 2022, 14(22), 15451; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215451
Submission received: 29 October 2022 / Revised: 11 November 2022 / Accepted: 18 November 2022 / Published: 21 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Food)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

- refine the abstract by adding the method used in this study (i.e. who is the respondents, data processing method, etc)

- add the theoretical contribution of this study in the abstract 

- explain in detail why this study focuss on high-quality green agricultural products and repurchase intention instead of loyalty?

- describe the benefits of this study in the introduction section

- describe how you select the variables used in this study

- what theories used for this study? explain.

- why you used Credamo, an industry-recognized questionnaire platform?

- why you use smart-pls to proceed the data?

- describe in detail the data collection process used in this study (i.e. how you distribute the questionnaire, etc)

- why you conduct multi-group analysis?

- describe the hypothesis result according to your case study.

- describe the limitation of this study 

- add the future works of this study

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

1) the authors may need to rewrite the thesis statement again, in the last paragraph of the introduction part - present this paragraph with more solid points and align with research objectives, research questions, and why this study should be appropriate to conduct the study.

2) According to the research framework, target respondents are "consumers" when the authors provide a conclusion part or in the management implications part, it would be better if the authors have provided more detail in terms of consumer perspective by looking at the survey.

3) Better to remove the word "SPSS" out.

4) Subheading "data collection" -- recheck with screening question "What is the common color of bottled water?" how this question relates to the study?

5) Subheading "Rice and Apples" -- the authors should provide a general idea in the introduction part why the authors define "rice and apples" in "Green Agricultural Products" only two items. Otherwise, this will make the reader confuse.

6. In the conclusion part, recheck with repeating words.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for revising the manuscript.

Back to TopTop