Next Article in Journal
Promising Technology Analysis and Patent Roadmap Development in the Hydrogen Supply Chain
Next Article in Special Issue
Provable Secure Authentication Protocol in Fog-Enabled Smart Home Environment
Previous Article in Journal
A Systematic Review of the Delphi–AHP Method in Analyzing Challenges to Public-Sector Project Procurement and the Supply Chain: A Developing Country’s Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Alternate Data Stream Attack Framework to Perform Stealth Attacks on Active Directory Hosts
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Lattice-Based Verifiably Encrypted Signature Scheme without Gaussian Sampling for Privacy Protection in Blockchain

Sustainability 2022, 14(21), 14225; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114225
by Xiuhua Lu 1, Wei Yin 2 and Pingyuan Zhang 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Sustainability 2022, 14(21), 14225; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114225
Submission received: 29 September 2022 / Revised: 22 October 2022 / Accepted: 25 October 2022 / Published: 31 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Cybersecurity: Information Technology and Education)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors proposed a lattice based verifiably encrypted scheme for blockchain. 

 

Although, there is significant discussion on small range random sampling instead of Guassian sampling, however, there are no practical results as to how this will speed up the process. Simulation results/ discussion should be incorporated.  Moreover, its security should also be discussed, as to how the security is not compromised. 

 

The comparison in Table 1 with ref 6, 7, 8 seems odd. Comparison with the latest lattice based signatures schemes should be incorporated. The symbols used for comparison in Table 1 should be explicitly defined to compel the readers regarding the efficiency. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have tried to address my arguments. 

Reviewer 3 Report

Please do work on sentence structure and modify it on English proofreading professional. Further the paper merits for acceptance. 

Back to TopTop