Review Reports
by
- Xiuhua Lu 1,
- Wei Yin 2 and
- Pingyuan Zhang 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Fawad Khan Reviewer 3: Fawad Masood
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The authors proposed a lattice based verifiably encrypted scheme for blockchain.
Although, there is significant discussion on small range random sampling instead of Guassian sampling, however, there are no practical results as to how this will speed up the process. Simulation results/ discussion should be incorporated. Moreover, its security should also be discussed, as to how the security is not compromised.
The comparison in Table 1 with ref 6, 7, 8 seems odd. Comparison with the latest lattice based signatures schemes should be incorporated. The symbols used for comparison in Table 1 should be explicitly defined to compel the readers regarding the efficiency.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
The authors have tried to address my arguments.
Reviewer 3 Report
Please do work on sentence structure and modify it on English proofreading professional. Further the paper merits for acceptance.