Dynamic of Ecological Agriculture Certification in Romania Facing the EU Organic Action Plan
, Alexandru-Dragoș Robu 1, Florin-Daniel Lipșa 2 and Carmen Luiza Costuleanu 1Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Dear author/s,
the topic of the manuscript is interesting, however, there are several aspects that need to be reviewed:
1. Table 1 is diffcicult to follow. Please make it clrearer.
2. Please mention the originality of your paper and emphasize how the results of the research fulfill the gap in the existing literature
3. In the conclusions section emphasize more the implications of your findings. Also, future research directions should be mentioned.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
1) I hope authors must aware the difference between review article, communication article, research article. The paper submitted to sustainability Journal it seems to be a communication article .
2) Authors are not serious at all while writing to article for instance line 47 why citation number 35 must be here, and followed by citation 1,2,3.... please use zotero to cite your manuscript
3) Similarly line 110 citation number 11 must come early and after that 18. please recite
4) Authors what is the novelty of the present work is not highlited any where throughout the article
5) Materials and methodologies well written .
6) results and discussion are also well written
7) if authors have combined 4 and 5 chapters and make shorten then it will be interesting to readers
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
The research topic is very interesting, and I have only a few comments to the authors. Firstly, please improve the description of the content and make it more succinctly; Secondly, for easier understanding, please use 2.1/2.2/2.3 in the method section, and if possible, please use flow chart to describe the process of data acquisition. Lastly, please improve the quality of tables and figures.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 3 Report
The authors have addressed all my concerns.
