Next Article in Journal
Toward an AI Era: Application of Artificial Intelligence in Inclusion Complex Screening
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Tacrolimus–Posaconazole Interactions in Renal Transplant Patients with Different CYP3A5 Genotypes, Based on Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sexual Function and Depressive Symptoms in Metformin-Treated Women with Drug-Induced Hyperprolactinemia and Different Vitamin D Status: A Pilot Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Polypharmacy and Drug–Drug Interactions in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Clinical Review

by
Maria-Medana Drăgoi
1,2,
Florina-Diana Goldiș
1,2,
Sabina-Oana Vasii
1,2,
Daiana Colibășanu
1,2,
Liana Suciu
1,3,*,
Angela Caunii
1,4,* and
Lucreția Udrescu
1,4
1
Center for Drug Data Analysis, Cheminformatics, and the Internet of Medical Things, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, 300041 Timişoara, Romania
2
Doctoral School of Pharmacy, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, 300041 Timişoara, Romania
3
Department II—Pharmacology, Physiology and Physiopathology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, 300041 Timişoara, Romania
4
Department I—Clinical Pharmacy and Drug Analysis, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, 300041 Timişoara, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2026, 18(6), 640; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18060640 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 3 April 2026 / Revised: 7 May 2026 / Accepted: 20 May 2026 / Published: 23 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug–Drug Interactions—New Perspectives)

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is commonly managed alongside multimorbidity, polypharmacy, recurrent treatment escalation, and older age, all of which increase vulnerability to drug–drug interactions (DDIs). We aimed to synthesize the main DDI domains relevant to COPD pharmacotherapy and to distinguish harmful DDIs from beneficial combination therapy and formal compatibility findings. Methods: We performed a narrative review using structured literature searches and citation tracking to evaluate COPD-related studies. We prioritized direct COPD-specific DDI evidence, while also including mechanistic, class-specific, and contextual studies when direct evidence was lacking. Retained evidence included observational cohorts, prescribing studies, pharmacokinetic trials, case reports, and systematic reviews. Results: The reviewed literature indicates that DDI vulnerability in COPD is driven less by isolated drug pairs than by overall regimen complexity, multimorbidity, aging, fragmented prescribing, and high-intensity treatment periods such as exacerbations, hospitalization, and discharge. Key DDI domains included cardiopulmonary co-treatment, QT-related vulnerability, and potential or clinically relevant interactions amplified during exacerbations. Inhaled therapies are not universally interaction-free, particularly with strong metabolic inhibitors. Psychotropics, frailty, dementia, and palliative care further increase clinical complexity. However, beneficial bronchodilator combinations and formal compatibility studies demonstrate that not all multidrug COPD regimens are harmful. Conclusions: In COPD, DDI assessment should focus on the full treatment regimen and not be limited to a set of iconic drug pairs. Clinicians must focus on exacerbation-related prescribing, QT-active drugs, theophylline exposure, psychotropic co-medication, and vulnerable subgroups such as older, frail, and palliative patients. Pharmacist-supported drug review, drug reconciliation, and selective deprescribing are key strategies for reducing clinically relevant DDI burden in COPD.
Keywords: drug safety; polypharmacy; regimen complexity; pharmacokinetic interactions; inhaled therapy; older adults; palliative care; exacerbations drug safety; polypharmacy; regimen complexity; pharmacokinetic interactions; inhaled therapy; older adults; palliative care; exacerbations

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Drăgoi, M.-M.; Goldiș, F.-D.; Vasii, S.-O.; Colibășanu, D.; Suciu, L.; Caunii, A.; Udrescu, L. Polypharmacy and Drug–Drug Interactions in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Clinical Review. Pharmaceutics 2026, 18, 640. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18060640

AMA Style

Drăgoi M-M, Goldiș F-D, Vasii S-O, Colibășanu D, Suciu L, Caunii A, Udrescu L. Polypharmacy and Drug–Drug Interactions in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Clinical Review. Pharmaceutics. 2026; 18(6):640. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18060640

Chicago/Turabian Style

Drăgoi, Maria-Medana, Florina-Diana Goldiș, Sabina-Oana Vasii, Daiana Colibășanu, Liana Suciu, Angela Caunii, and Lucreția Udrescu. 2026. "Polypharmacy and Drug–Drug Interactions in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Clinical Review" Pharmaceutics 18, no. 6: 640. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18060640

APA Style

Drăgoi, M.-M., Goldiș, F.-D., Vasii, S.-O., Colibășanu, D., Suciu, L., Caunii, A., & Udrescu, L. (2026). Polypharmacy and Drug–Drug Interactions in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Clinical Review. Pharmaceutics, 18(6), 640. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18060640

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop