Skip to Content
PharmaceuticsPharmaceutics
  • Review
  • Open Access

22 April 2026

32 Pages

Trastuzumab Resistance, a Potential Roadblock for Most Successful Therapy of Breast Cancer—An Updated Review of Underlying Mechanisms, Clinical Trials and Patents to Evade the Resistance

,
,
,
,
,
and
Department of Biotechnology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hajipur 844102, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

Trastuzumab is the first humanised monoclonal antibody (Mab) developed for breast cancer (BC) therapy. The high affinity of Trastuzumab Fab-domain binding to the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptor, with a Kd value of <1 nM, is also accompanied by Fc domain interaction with Fc-receptors in natural killer cells and leukocytes, enabling the killing of tumour cells through antibody-directed cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Trastuzumab blocks the over-expressed HER2 receptor-mediated dimerization and consequent intracellular signalling, leading to cancerous growth. However, the trastuzumab resistance (TR) became the major problem within 1 year of treatment. The mutation in phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase (PI3K) pathway, cross-talk with estrogen receptors, over-expression of Mucin 1 (MUC1) protein, insulin-like growth factor I receptor, etc., are key pathways involved in TR. In this review, we have provided a molecular view of TR and the possible remedies for overcoming TR using BC stem cell (BCSC)-based therapy, PI3K pathway inhibitors, MUC1-based treatment, etc. We have also analysed the patents and clinical trials from the pre-TR and post-TR era to rationalise the possible steps to overcome TR. Our analysis implies that Trastuzumab monotherapy no longer applies to HER2+ BC treatment. Further, combination therapy using other antibodies like pertuzumab and protein kinase inhibitors and targeting pathways like the ubiquitin proteasome pathway will be the future option for BC Treatment. Overall, this review provides a detailed summary of the molecular mechanisms involving TR and its potential ways of evasion, based on updated information from published research articles, clinical trial outcomes, and patent data.

1. Introduction

In 2020, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a specialised cancer agency of the World Health Organisation (WHO), released a report that showed that breast cancer (BC) has overtaken lung cancer as the most prevalent cancer throughout the globe [1]. BC is also the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide [2]. The observed over-expression of HER2 in approximately 20–30% of BC patients has encouraged researchers for years to find a drug/antibody to target HER2 so that the drug can stop HER2-mediated BC. In 1984, gene ‘neu’ [3] was isolated from rat neuro/glioblastoma encoding a protein with 185 KDa, similar to a gene located at the human q21 region of chromosome 17 [4]. Due to the significant similarities of the ‘neu’ gene with the protein sequence of the EGFR (HER1), the ‘neu’ gene was named HER2, a kinase receptor at the cell surface. In 1986, it was proven for the first time that the NIH3T3 cells became tumorigenic when transfected with the HER2 gene in vivo [5]. Further, that study showed that treating the mice with an antibody against the ‘neu’ gene product (an anti-HER2 antibody) significantly suppresses tumour growth. In 1987, it was established that poor prognosis in BC patients is significantly correlated with the amplification of the HER2 gene in about 30% of BC tumours [6]. In 1989, a monoclonal antibody (Mab) “4D5” (based on the Hybridoma culture name) was isolated from BALB/c mice, which has a high specificity of binding toward human HER2 and not HER1; thereby selectively suppressing the progression of HER2-positive BC cells [7]. The mouse 4D5 monoclonal antibody was eventually humanized [8] and named Trastuzumab or Herceptin, which showed significant clinical efficacy toward patients with HER2-positive BC compared to conventional chemotherapies. In short, the discovery of a 185 kDa unknown transmembrane human receptor, now known as the HER2 receptor, inspired the development of the first humanised monoclonal antibody (Mab), Trastuzumab, which received FDA and EU approval in 1998 and 2000, respectively. The results from two clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab, where it was established that progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer due to the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy (7.6 vs. 4.6 months with chemotherapy alone), as was median overall survival (OS) (25.4 vs. 20.3 months) [9,10]. The success of trastuzumab and its subsequent commercialisation emerged from the work of 3 scientists: Axel Ullrich and Michael Shepard of Genentech, and Dennis Salmon of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA). Trastuzumab had 2018 worldwide sales of $7.5 billion. The patents on trastuzumab expired in the US in June 2019 and in Europe in July 2014. There are currently five trastuzumab biosimilars available in the USA. The global trastuzumab biosimilars market is expected to grow from $2.08 billion in 2021 to $2.64 billion in 2022 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 27.1%. These numbers indicate the importance of Trastuzumab in BC treatment.
The HER2 receptors, which are similar to epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR, HER1), ErbB3 (HER3), and ErbB4 (HER4) consist of three main domains: (a) the extracellular domain that contains the four subdomains of HER2 receptor allowing ligand-dependent or -independent dimerization, (b) transmembrane domain that connects extracellular and cytoplasmic domains, and (c) the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain that contains tyrosine kinase and regulatory subdomains for activation of downstream signaling pathways [11]. To date, no HER2-specific ligand has been identified, indicating that HER2 can go for ligand-independent homo or hetero dimerization to activate the signaling pathway that leads to BC. Therefore, the inhibition of HER2 dimerization, the primary target of trastuzumab, leads to suppression of HER2-mediated cell signalling and tumour growth. One of the primary reasons for the particular binding of trastuzumab is that the Mab never has to compete with any intracellular ligand for binding with the HER2 receptor. However, during 2005–2007, it was observed that a fraction (~20%) of early-stage BC patients do not respond to trastuzumab, and ~70% of patients with metastatic disease who receive trastuzumab monotherapy are resistant to treatment within 1 year of treatment [12,13]. This indicates that although the application of anti-HER2-based trastuzumab represents a striking advantage over chemotherapy, resistance to trastuzumab therapy leads to recurrence, which limits the survival of HER2-positive BC patients. Therefore, the resistance of trastuzumab has become a global concern for BC treatment, considering the early success of monotherapy for this Mab. Therefore, this review initially focuses on the pathways related to TR. Further, we looked at different applications and strategies that dealt with overcoming this resistance. We have summarised the claims of different patents and clinical trials related to the pre- and post-TR era to identify a future direction for tackling this resistance.

2. Different Mechanisms of TR

2.1. HER2 Mutations

The discovery of the HER2 receptor and its consequent overexpression in BC cells advanced the discovery of the first humanized monoclonal antibody, Trastuzumab, ADC, etc. (Figure 1). Trastuzumab cannot bind to the receptor when HER2 is mutated by deletion of its extracellular domain [14]. The shortened and N-terminally deleted p95HER2 isoform with constitutive kinase activity is produced by proteolysis or by translation of the HER2 mRNA from internal initiation codons [15,16,17]. This mutant isoform encourages ongoing oncogenic signalling activation while evading the effects of trastuzumab by not allowing any binding sites on the HER2 receptor for the mAb. Those who developed the p95HER2 mutation were less likely to respond to trastuzumab than those with full-length HER2. This was established in a study of 46 patients with metastatic BC tumours [17]. Among 46 patients with metastatic BC only, 11% of patients expressing p95HER2 responded to trastuzumab. However, >51% of patients with tumours expressing full-length HER2 achieved either a complete or partial response in the presence of trastuzumab. However, treatment with lapatinib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) shows almost equal response, indicating that tyrosine kinase activity is retained in p95HER2-expressing cells. The HER2 protein’s inability to bind trastuzumab is caused by several genetic abnormalities, which also contribute to TR. As an illustration, p95HER2, also referred to as the HER2 carboxy-terminal fragment, is deficient in the N-terminal extracellular domain required for trastuzumab binding. This fragment is produced either by the shedding of the extracellular domain by metalloprotease ADAM10 (also known as ‘sheddase’) or by the alternate start or translation of the HER2-coding mRNA. Through its capacity to constitutively create homodimers that are stabilized by disulfide linkages, p95HER2 enhances TR [18]. High levels of p95HER2 were found to be associated with shorter PFS and worse OS in metastatic BC patients receiving trastuzumab [19]. Therefore, for a fraction of HER2+ patients with metastatic BC, p95HER2 is an appropriate target.
Figure 1. Timeline describing the brief History of the major developments of Trastuzumab (1994–2023) from gene discovery to ADC and its use for overcoming resistance.

2.2. Mechanism of TR Through Crosstalk Between HER2 and Estrogen Receptors

In 2006, Munzone et al. showed for the first time that a patient with HER2+ and ER-negative advanced BC can convert into an ER-positive patient after treatment with trastuzumab and chemotherapy [20]. It was concluded from the clinical trial data that inhibition of HER2 by trastuzumab and chemotherapy leads to the activation of ER gene transcription via signalling crosstalk pathways, involving the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway more prominently. This increased ER signalling pathway compensates for tumour growth and survival under trastuzumab treatment for HER2+ BC [21]. Consequently, there is a growing interest in combination treatments that simultaneously target both HER2 and ER (by endocrine therapy) to combat this resistance mechanism effectively [22]. However, a critical question remains whether patients who have previously received HER2-targeted therapies would benefit from continuing endocrine therapy alongside chemotherapy or Antibody–Drug Conjugate (ADC)-based treatments [23,24]. The phase II clinical trial (PERTAIN, NCT01491737) with patients of HER2+ and ER+ BC indicates that when ER is overexpressed, trastuzumab alone cannot work and combination therapy is required [25]. In this context, the trastuzumab and tamoxifen combined therapy was effective for HER2+ and ER+ BC. It was observed that patients with ER+ mBC showed better prognosis after treatment in combination with immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) and antiestrogen agents like letrozole or tamoxifen [26]. All these studies prove that targeting both HER2 and ER is more beneficial than HER2-targeted therapy alone. The mechanism of action of Trastuzuamb with its structure is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Schematic structure of Trastuzumab with Fab and Fc part, where residue important for Inflammation and ADCC is indicated (A). Specific binding domain of Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab and Tyrosine kinase inhibitors on HER-2 is indicated (B).

2.3. Failure to Trigger ADCC

The concept of immunomodulatory antibodies came into the limelight due to the discovery of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) as immune checkpoint inhibitors. The checkpoint proteins, like programmed death (PD)-1 (present in T cells), bind with PD ligand-1 (PD-L1), which is generally overexpressed in most cancer cells. This binding acts as an ‘off-signal’ for immune-mediated signalling, so cancer cells can evade T-cell-mediated death. A very similar mechanism is involved in ADCC, where the antibody’s constant region (Fc) interacts with Fcγ receptors (FcγRs), which recruit neutrophils and NK cells to the tumour cells, which are already bound by the Fab part of the antibody due to strong receptor-ligand interaction (Figure 3) [27]. The NK cells then release perforins and granules to kill the bound tumour cells by apoptosis. The initial observation of trastuzumab’s mechanism of action, involving ADCC, was first documented in preclinical animal models. Factors influencing the efficacy of HER2-directed therapy in ADCC induction include Tumour-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) and Fcγ receptor polymorphisms. The Fcγ receptors are abundant on leukocytes and recognise IgG-coated immune complexes through the Fc receptor of the antibody. Various strategies have been investigated to enhance ADCC in the context of HER2-targeted therapies. ADCC is governed by three Fcγ receptors expressed on immune cells: CD16A, CD32A, and CD32B [28]. To enhance ADCC, margetuximab (a chimeric Mab targeting HER2+ BC cells) was engineered to preserve the epitope specificity of trastuzumab while introducing five amino acid modifications, increasing its affinity for the activating Fcγ receptor IIIA (CD16A) and reducing its affinity for the inhibitory Fcγ receptor II (CD32B) [25,29]. This antibody is very similar to trastuzumab except that the Fc section is engineered to bind with both alleles of CD16A with improved ADCC. Due to progressive Trastuzumab treatment, the mutant version of allele CD16A-158V is generated in BC cells. This eventually makes Trastuzumab treatment ineffective for these BC cells due to reduced Fc-FcγRs interaction in ADCC [30]. In the phase 3 SOPHIA trials, margetuximab + chemotherapy and trastuzumab + chemotherapy were compared in 536 patients with previously treated HER2+ advanced BC+ metastatic BC (mBC). The PFS was much better for margetuximab + chemotherapy, even though HER2+ binding is similar for both margetuximab and trastuzumab. This indicates that better ADCC activity of margetuximab is responsible for a higher BC cure rate. In addition to failure in ADCC activity, antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) mediated by macrophages also plays an important role in the development of trastuzumab resistance [31]. Under normal conditions, trastuzumab-coated HER2-positive tumour cells can be recognized and engulfed by macrophages through Fc receptor interactions, contributing to antitumor immunity [32]. However, during TR, this process becomes dysregulated due to changes within the tumour microenvironment (TME). Tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) often undergo polarization toward an immunosuppressive M2 phenotype, which supports tumour growth, angiogenesis, and tissue remodelling rather than immune-mediated clearance [33]. These M2 macrophages exhibit reduced phagocytic activity against antibody-coated tumour cells and secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β, further suppressing adaptive immune responses [34]. Moreover, overexpression of “do not eat me” signals, such as CD47, on tumor cells can inhibit ADCP by preventing macrophage recognition and engulfment [35]. Together, these alterations in macrophage function and signaling pathways contribute to an ineffective ADCP response, allowing HER2-positive tumour cells to evade immune-mediated elimination and promoting TR [36]. This highlights the importance of targeting macrophage polarization or blocking inhibitory pathways like CD47–SIRPα to restore effective ADCP and enhance the therapeutic efficacy of trastuzumab [37].
Figure 3. A schematic diagram of HER2-mediated therapy using Trastuzumab with a specific focus on ADCC.

2.4. Changes in HER2 Downstream Signalling Pathways

2.4.1. Loss of PTEN Expression/Function & P13K Mutation or Increased Activity

Humans produce an enzyme called Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN), created by the PTEN gene [38]. This enzyme acts as a tumour suppressor by regulating cell division and preventing uncontrolled growth. Mutations in the PTEN gene are linked to various cancers, including BC. The PI3K/Akt is constitutively activated due to PTEN depletion [39]. Reduced PTEN expression or activity prevented trastuzumab-mediated growth suppression in BC cells overexpressing HER2 [40]. Numerous malignancies, including about 50% of BCs, have been shown to cause PTEN loss of function brought on by mutation or transcriptional regulation [41,42].
Trastuzumab treatment outcomes were lower in patients with PTEN-deficient HER2-overexpressing MBC than those with normal PTEN tumours. Another study claimed that increasing Notch-1 expression in trastuzumab-resistant cells was required for tumour recurrence in vivo. They also demonstrated a mechanism by which Notch-1 is required for trastuzumab resistance by repressing PTEN expression to contribute to activation of ERK1/2 signalling. To determine if Notch-1-mediated inhibition of PTEN is required for trastuzumab-resistant tumour initiation, they tested the effect of Notch-1 and/or PTEN inhibition on the rate of tumour onset. PTEN knockdown alone resulted in tumour initiation at a similar rate to the control siRNA-transfected cells. Combined Notch-1 and PTEN knockdown resulted in a similar rate of tumour initiation compared to control, Notch-1, or PTEN siRNA [Figure 4]. These findings suggest that Notch-1 contributes to trastuzumab resistance by repressing PTEN, which may lead to hyperactivation of ERK1/2 signalling. TR has also been linked to oncogenic activating PI3K mutations. Berns and colleagues looked for activating PIK3CA mutations in hotspot areas of 55 HER2-amplified primary tumour samples from trastuzumab-refractory patients. According to earlier investigations on the frequency of mutations in HER2-amplified BC, 25% of tumours had mutations [43,44,45]. PTEN expression was also examined in this collection of cancers, and in 22% of tumours, decreased PTEN expression was seen. Patients with active PI3K (defined as decreased PTEN expression or PIK3CA mutation) exhibited a substantially lower PFS on trastuzumab-based treatment than patients without evidence of PI3K pathway activation, according to Kaplan–Meier survival curves. Further, PIK3CA (39%) and PTEN (20%) mutations were more common in cell lines than tumours, but PIK3CA mutations did not have a significant effect on clinical efficacy after adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in [46] HR + BC patients.
Figure 4. PTEN Signalling pathway inhibition by Notch 1 is required for trastuzumab-resistant tumour formation. (A) In the nude mice, it was shown that PTEN knockdown initiates tumour initiation, whereas Notch 1 knockdown inhibits tumour formation. (B) Tumour formation in the presence of different inhibitors, including Notch1. (C) mRNA expression of breast cancer cells promoted by non-structural maintenance of chromosome condensin 1 complex subunit G. (A,B) Reproduced/adapted with permission from [Nature] for reference [47]. (C) adapted with permission from Nature for reference [48].

2.4.2. Cyclin-Dependent Kinases and p27

In vivo, p27 can inhibit the kinase activities of a variety of cyclin/CDK complexes (where N-terminal domain is sufficient to block cyclin/CDK kinase activity) including those containing CDK1, -2, -4, or -6, and cyclins A, E, or D. Downregulation of the p27KIP1 protein is associated with poor prognosis in several human cancers, often due to its cytoplasmic localization or phosphorylation. Trastuzumab influences the CDK inhibitor p27Kip1, a key regulator of cell growth. It is crucial for cell cycle regulation by binding to the cyclin E-CDK2 complex during the G1 phase [49]. Proliferating cells exit the cell cycle when p27Kip1 levels rise, while quiescent cells resume proliferation when p27Kip1 levels decrease. Therefore, p27Kip1 plays a significant role in human cancer development due to its key function in cell cycle regulation [50].
Reducing cyclin E expression or using CDK2 inhibitors decreased cyclin E activity in trastuzumab-resistant clones, reducing proliferation and increasing apoptosis. These findings imply that cyclin E overexpression and CDK2 activity are directly involved in trastuzumab resistance, suggesting that CDK2 inhibitors could be an effective treatment for BC patients with co-amplification of HER2 and cyclin E. Trastuzumab inhibits HER2-overexpressing BC by inducing G1 cell cycle arrest, with an elevation of p27Kip1 and a decrease in CDK2. A post-translational modification of anti-HER2 antibodies controls the phosphorylation of the p27Kip1 protein, through which the protein is upregulated. The magnitude of G1 cell cycle arrest induced by trastuzumab or 4D5 is well correlated with the induced level of p27Kip1. Anti-HER2 antibody-induced p27Kip1 protein, G1 arrest, and growth inhibition persist at least 5 days after 14 h of treatment with a single dose of trastuzumab [51].

2.4.3. Role of Epigenetic Modifications in Trastuzumab Resistance

Histone Modification
Cancer cells contain altered post-translational histone modifications, including the loss of specific histone acetylation and methylation, in human carcinomas. For example, specific histone lysine acetylation (H3K9ac, H4K12ac, H3K18ac, and H4K16ac), lysine methylation (H3K4me2 and H4K20me3), and arginine methylation (H4R3me2) were identified using immunohistochemistry studies in human breast carcinomas of a significant population (n = 880) [52]. Histone acetylation (H3K9ac, H4K12ac, H3K18ac, and H4K16ac) and di-methylation at H3K4 (H3K4me2) are examples of activating histones that are frequently enriched at the ERBB2 promoter and enhancer regions in trastuzumab-sensitive tumours. This promotes an open chromatin conformation and high ERBB2 transcriptional activity. The chromatin activity of the ERBB2 locus controls the expression of the ERBB2 gene in BC. Because their ERBB2 chromatin is more open and active, these BC cells have greater levels of ERBB2 expression [53].
DNA Methylation
DNA methylation is a reversible epigenetic process in which methyl groups are added to the fifth carbon of cytosine residues using S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) as the methyl donor. This reaction is catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), primarily DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B. Here, DNMT1 primarily functions as a maintenance methyltransferase that preserves methylation patterns during DNA replication by methylating hemi-methylated DNA [54]. Whole-genome analyses have demonstrated a strong correlation between DNA methylation patterns and BC pathogenesis, identifying 345 methylated genes across 40 BC cell lines. Palomeras et al. looked into how DNA methylation contributes to TR in BC that is HER2-positive. Up to 62% of individuals experience resistance to trastuzumab after a year, despite the drug’s initial potent therapeutic effects. Researchers analysed the DNA methylation patterns of trastuzumab-sensitive (SK) and resistant (SKTR) cell lines using Infinium Human Methylation 450K arrays, taking into account methylation variations that were greater than 60%. The expression and methylation of five potential genes—TGFβ1, CXCL2, SLC38A1, and NR2F2—consistently changed across SK and SKTR cell lines. Methylation-specific PCR, qPCR, and treatment with the demethylating reagent 5-aza-DC were used to validate these results. According to this study, TR in individuals with HER2-positive BC may be predicted or monitored by hypermethylation of these five genes [55].
In another study, hypermethylation and downregulation of the TGF-Β1, CXCL2, and SLC38A1 genes were observed in trastuzumab-resistant SKTR cell lines. These results were validated by qRT-PCR and bisulfite pyrosequencing, with TGFβI exhibiting the highest association between transcriptional suppression and promoter hypermethylation [56]. Here, restoring TGF-βI expression in resistant cells improved trastuzumab sensitivity. Additionally, TGF-βI hypermethylation was found to be substantially linked to a poor response to trastuzumab-based therapy in patient samples with HER2+ BC, implying its potential as an early indicator for TR [56].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs)
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are non-coding RNAs of 18–25 nucleotides in length that prevent the expression of genes by binding to or degrading them. To date, more than 1000 distinct miRNA genes [57] have been discovered, which regulate gene expression. Thirty per cent of human genes are thought to be targeted by miRNAs’ interactions with various genes, which are engaged in a wide range of biological processes, such as the cell cycle, cancer, metabolic regulation, immunological response, and apoptosis [58]. It has been found that several miRNAs are expressed abnormally in HER2-positive BC cell lines and are linked to TR. The increased production of miR-21 prevents apoptosis in cancer cells, promoting their growth. Higher expression of miR-21 is inversely linked with PTEN expression, and loss of PTEN causes resistance to trastuzumab via activating the PI3K pathway [59]. Between trastuzumab-resistant and -sensitive cell lines, microarray analysis identified 151 substantially different miRNAs, including 46 upregulated and 105 downregulated miRNAs. QRT-PCR validated seven miRNAs with consistent expression patterns. According to functional enrichment analysis, the biological processes associated with trastuzumab resistance are primarily regulated by the PI3K-Akt signalling pathway. A study of patients’ sera revealed that cases of trastuzumab resistance were associated with significantly downregulated miR-224 and increased expression of miR-200b, miR-135b, and miR-29a. Therefore, these four miRNAs were shown to be highly linked with trastuzumab resistance, indicating their potential as predictive biomarkers. The protein–protein interaction (PPI) network also revealed three subnetwork modules that shed more light on the molecular processes behind trastuzumab resistance involving these miRNAs [60].
Rezaei et al. proposed a possible correlation between plasma miRNAs and trastuzumab response in patients with HER2-positive BC. According to their findings, resistant BT-474 cells have considerably higher levels of miR-1246 and miR-23b-3p and lower levels of miR-195-5p and miR-34c-3p. The resistant group had significantly lower levels of miR-195-5p, miR-34c-3p, and miR-1246 in plasma samples, but there was no statistically significant difference in the expression of miR-23b-3p. Furthermore, the expression of c-MET, CCND1, MAP2K1, and PTEN was significantly elevated in these samples. These findings suggested that miR-195-5p, miR-34c-3p, and miR-1246 might be potential biomarkers for prognosis and early identification of the trastuzumab-resistant population from the sensitive group of patients with HER2-positive BC [61].

2.5. Overexpression of Other Receptors and Proteins in Resistance

2.5.1. Increased Expression of IGF-1R

The insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) may play a role in TR. Lu et al. found that excessive IGF-1R levels can make trastuzumab-sensitive SKBR3 cells resistant to the therapy. These IGF-1R-overexpressing cells have reduced p27Kip1 and p21Cip1 proteins and increased CDK2 kinase activity [62]. Jerome et al. proved that IGF1R-overexpressing cells play a role in developing TR by escaping cell cycle arrest caused by trastuzumab. This study evaluated human IGF binding protein 3 (rhIGFBP-3), an antagonist of IGF-IR signalling, in Trastuzumab-resistant BC cells in vitro and in vivo. It was observed that rhIGFBP-3 decreased IGF-I-induced IGF-IR phosphorylation and worked synergistically with Trastuzumab against HER-2-overexpressing BC cells in vitro. Furthermore, a high degree of IGF-1R expression in HER2-amplified cell lines is associated with a reduced response to trastuzumab [63,64]. This is due to HER2 and IGF-1R interaction, with IGF-1 activation resulting in HER2 phosphorylation and PI3K stimulation. IGF-1R signalling attenuation stops HER2 phosphorylation and restoration of trastuzumab sensitivity [65]. These results provide an opportunity to evaluate the simultaneous blockade of the HER-2 and IGF-IR pathways using a combination therapy, which may include rhIGFBP-3 and trastuzumab, in patients with HER-2-positive BC.

2.5.2. Increased Activity of Rac1 and Activation of TNFα

The Rho family of GTPases is a family of small (~21 kDa) monomeric G proteins that belong to the Ras superfamily of GTPases. The Ras superfamily of GTPases comprises more than 50 members with several common features: their molecular weight (18–28 kDa), their C-terminal poly-isoprenylation region, and the property to bind to and hydrolyse guanine nucleotides. The Rho GTPases form 8 subfamilies, among which one subfamily comprises Rac1, Rac2, Rac3, and RhoG. In SKBR3 cells, resistance to trastuzumab was linked to elevated Rac1 activity, which resulted in considerable cytoskeleton disarray. Decreased extracellular signalling regulates kinase function in resistant clones, trastuzumab-facilitated endocytic downregulation of HER2, and low Rac1 activity [66]. Further, it was shown that dysregulation of classical Rho GTPases like Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 can initiate BC and its metastasis [67].
Tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα) activates c-Src to cause HER2 phosphorylation in BC cells. TNFα-induced NFkB activation and cell proliferation were inhibited by HER2 knockdown via RNA modification or by the use of AG825, an inhibitor of EGFR/HER2-TK. Trastuzumab, nevertheless, was unable to prevent TNFα from stimulating the growth of BC. It is interesting to note that TNFα can trans-express HER2 and employ it as a downstream signalling molecule necessary for mitogenic signalling production. Since many people with breast tumours have TNFα in their tumour microenvironment, treating HER2-positive patients with TNF-α as a target may be possible [68,69]. The blockade of TNF-α was proposed as a therapy to treat BC since TNFα enhances luminal BC cell proliferation by aromatase upregulation. This aromatase enzyme increases estradiol synthesis, which, after binding to ER, promotes luminal cancer cell proliferation [70]. Stable overexpression of TNFα in BT-474 cells, a human HER2-positive BC cell line, led to high activation of the Akt and NF-κB signalling pathways. Further, it was proven that TNFα-induced expression of mucin 4 is partially responsible for TR in HER2-positive BC [71].

3. Different Ways of Overcoming Trastuzumab Resistance

3.1. BC Stem Cell (BCSC)-Specific Therapeutic Approaches for TR

The aggressive progression and recurrence of BC were due to the presence of a subset of tumour cells known as BC stem cells (BCSCs). These cells possess the abilities of self-renewal and tumour initiation, which allows them to drive metastases and tumour growth. These cells reside in a microenvironment filled with resident inflammatory cells that generate signalling cues for BCSC-mediated self-renewal and survival [72].
Three key proteins were known markers for BCSCs: CD44, CD24, and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH). However, studies have shown that, sometimes, BCSCs contain both CD44 and ALDH, but not CD24 [73]. The behaviour of BCSCs is regulated by several pathways, including PI3K/AKT, TGF-/SMAD, Wnt/Catenin, Notch, JAK/STAT, NF-B, and other signalling pathways. Therefore, crosstalk or deregulation of those pathways may be a factor in the growth or transition of BCSCs in controlling TR.

3.1.1. Therapeutic Approaches Targeting Different Signalling Pathways

Dysregulation of the PI3K/AKT pathway and loss of the tumour suppressor Phosphatase and TENsin homolog (PTEN), a downstream mediator of the PI3K/AKT pathway [74,75], have been linked to adaptation or resistance to trastuzumab and have been found in over 40% of HER2-positive BCs [76]. PTEN loss may cause TR in HER2-positive BC by initiating epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and switching the CD44+/CD24−/low/HER2−/low subtypes. The dimerization of HER2 with its coreceptor HER3 and subsequent direct coupling to the p85 regulatory subunit of PI3K and activation of PI3K-AKT signalling, which drives ALDH+ populations in HER2-overexpressing cells, is another explanation for the emergence of TR [77]. Trastuzumab could decrease the ALDH+ population but not eradicate it [78,79]. As a result, PI3K inhibitors might be able to lower the proportion of BCSCs (including CD44+/CD24/low and ALDH+ cells), hence lowering the HER2-positive BC susceptibility to trastuzumab [80,81]. When coupled with trastuzumab, the pan-PI3K inhibitor, XL147 lowered BCSC fractions and slowed the carcinogenesis, possibly by preventing acquired TR [82]. Additionally, an AKT inhibitor reduced the PI3K/AKT pathway and helped HER2-positive BC patients’ refractory BCSCs regain their sensitivity to trastuzumab. The mechanism of Trastuzumab resistance involving different signalling pathways is shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5. A schematic presentation of the Trastuzumab resistance mechanism involving different signalling pathways, where the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is highlighted.
One study found that inhibiting TGF-β signalling, which effectively controls the EMT and the maintenance of BCSCs, reduced resistance to trastuzumab [83]. A83-01, a different small molecule inhibitor, could alter the TGF-β/SMAD pathway, thereby stopping HER2-positive cells from developing a mesenchymal phenotype and improving the HER2-positive cells’ response to trastuzumab therapy [84]. The Wnt3/β -catenin signalling activation has been shown to drive resistance to endocrine treatment, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy in BCSCs [85,86]. The expression of Wnt3 in trastuzumab-resistant cells is correlated with increased nuclear expression of β-catenin and transactivates the expression of EGFR. The increased Wnt3 in the TR cells also promoted a partial EMT-like transition, like increased N-cadherin, Twist, and Slug expression and decreased E-cadherin expression., This was associated with the emergence of TR in HER2-overexpressing BC cells. Conversely, knockdown of Wnt3 by siRNA restored the cytoplasmic expression of β-catenin and decreased EGFR expression in trastuzumab-resistant cells. The Wnt3 transfectants of Trastuzumab-resistant cells, SKBR3/Wnt3-7 and SKBR3/Wnt3-9, showed a significant decrease in E-cadherin and an increase in N-cadherin, Twist, and Slug. Therefore, increased Wnt3 expression and associated β-catenin signalling lead to TR.
The mesenchymal CD44+/CD24/low phenotype in HER2-overexpressing BC was strongly related to TR and HER2 overexpression-activated STAT3, which causes upregulated CD44 expression. According to reports, the STAT3 inhibitor static kills the CSC phenotype in HER2-positive breast tumours, suggesting that JAK/STAT signalling may be a potential target for trastuzumab-resistant BC [87]. Further, combined treatment of Herceptin and Stattic showed a synergistic effect on the cancer cell growth in vitro. When the STAT3 gene was knocked down, the expression of the stem cell markers (OCT-4, SOX-2, and CD44) was downregulated, and tumour formation was abolished. It was concluded from the study that targeting STAT3 may overcome Trastuzumab-induced resistance in HER2-overexpressing breast tumours. Jiang, Lili et al. showed that non-structural maintenance of chromosome condensin 1 complex subunit G (NCAPG) expression was highly upregulated in trastuzumab-resistant HER2+ BC. Figure 4C shows that NCAPG promotes several STAT3 downstream genes. So, knockdown of the NCAPG can reverse the trastuzumab resistance [48]. Figure 6 represents the proposed inhibitors and their related pathways to overcome Trastuzumab Resistance.
Figure 6. A timeline of FDA approval of the development of small molecule inhibitors for the therapy of BC in combination with Trastuzumab and its ADC (A), and A schematic presentation of inhibitors targeting different pathways to overcome Trastuzumab resistance (B).
Mucin-4 (MUC4), a highly O-glycosylated membrane protein also thought to be HER2’s partner, was associated with a poor prognosis in BC and other carcinoma types [88]. The study using Trastuzumab-resistant JIMT-1 cell lines showed that MUC4 is overexpressed. Further knockdown of MUC4 at RNA levels increases trastuzumab susceptibility. In another study, TNFα-induced MUC4 expression was proposed as a novel TR mechanism where the administration of TNFα-blocking antibody etanercept with trastuzumab downregulated MUC4 [71]. It was also confirmed by TNF α treatment in BT474 and other HER2-overexpressing BC cell lines [Figure 7].
Figure 7. TNFα induces MUC4 expression in vivo and in vitro in BC cells, showing the importance of MUC4 in BC. (A) IHC of MUC4 expression decreased in the presence of TNFα inhibitor. (B,C) MUC4 levels were checked by Western blot in the presence of TNFα in TR cells (D). HzMUC1-MMAE induces apoptosis in HER2+ BC cells. (E) Quantification of the flow cytometry analysis data from (D). (A,C) Reproduced/adapted with permission from [AACR] for reference [71]. (D,E) Reproduced/adapted with permission from [SciEngine] for reference [89], * p < 0.05.
Therefore, steric Inhibition of Antibody–Receptor Interaction in overexpressed MUC4 is a possible mechanism of TR and TNFα signalling involved in TR [90]. The mBC cell line developed TR by upregulating MUC1*, a cleaved version of the MUC1 protein, where treatment with MUC1 antagonists can overcome the resistance [91]. Further, the humanized antibody targeting MUC1 reduced the growth of HCC1954 xenograft tumors by inhibiting cell proliferation, thereby reducing TR [89]. Wu, G. et al. also showed apoptosis induction by flow cytometry assay in the HER2-positive cancer cell line by humanized MUC1 treatment [Figure 6]. It was also found that MUC1 silencing reduces NF-κB activity in cancer cells, interrupting the self-renewal of tumour cells. Therefore, TR have a direct correlation with overexpressed MUC4 and MUC1 expression.
Conventional targeted therapies align well with the Goldie and Coldman mathematical model, which emphasizes early intervention to prevent resistance and disease progression. Recent advances in genetics and molecular biology have reshaped treatment strategies—not only focusing on primary tumour removal but also on disrupting the cancer cell homing process. These advancements aim to prevent the formation of premetastatic niches and cancer-associated fibroblasts [92]. Such outcomes can be achieved through cyclically administered immunotherapy, either in conjunction with adjuvant hormone therapy or with a limited number of chemotherapy cycles. In a recent study on HER2+ gastric cancer, it was found that trastuzumab resistance can be acquired through the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and the endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation (ERAD) pathway [93]. The study also identified tumour HLA loss as a significant mechanism underlying resistance to T-DXd. Another contributing factor is the immune-cold phenotype in patients with high ERBB2 expression, determined by spatial profiling. Previously in this study, we have discussed different mechanisms responsible for trastuzumab resistance. Upon examining these mechanisms and other signalling pathways, such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR, AMPK, and HIF1α, it becomes clear that they are a consequence of metabolic reprogramming. Resistant tumour cells remodel their metabolism and enhance glycolysis, increase reliance on oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), and up-regulate lipid and fatty acid metabolism to sustain growth and survival despite HER2 blockade [94].
Additionally, mitochondrial biogenesis, redox adaptation through ROS modulation, and glutamine dependence further contribute to cellular persistence under therapeutic stress. In a separate study, it was found that EbRb2, a 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase three inhibitor [95], reduces glycolysis and helps kill resistant breast cancer cells. It was also found that glutamine is a significant source of carbon and nitrogen for the cancer cells. Recent studies have shown that glutamine uptake inhibitors, GLS inhibitors, and glutamine-mimetic antimetabolites with immune checkpoint blockers synergistically affect cancer cell growth. Using different metabolic biomarkers to predict trastuzumab resistance and integrating this information with metabolic phenotyping, future personalised treatment strategies can be planned.

3.1.2. Role of Cytokines, Immune Modulators and Modified Tumour Microenvironment

The IL-6 and IL-8 levels were considerably increased in BCSCs that were enriched during long-term trastuzumab treatment. An important approach that could be utilized to combat TR is the inhibition of the IL-6 inflammatory feedback loop and the reduction in the BCSC population, particularly in the CD44+/CD24/low subgroups [96]. When Trastuzumab was combined with SCH563705, an inhibitor of the chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 1/2 (CXCR1/2), the treatment effectively eliminated BCSC-like cells. These results suggested that HER2-positive BCSCs can be targeted effectively by combining CXCR1/2 and HER2 signalling [96]. PD-L1 is a crucial negative regulator that aids different cancer cell types in evading the immune response. It was found that via stimulating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, PD-L1 had a significant impact on maintaining the stemness of BC cells. Recent findings indicate that utilizing immunotherapy against PD-L1 may be beneficial for treating HER2-overexpressing human BC cells cocultured with peripheral blood after trastuzumab treatment [97]. It was concluded that Trastuzumab-mediated upregulation of PD-L1 through engagement of immune effector cells may function as a possible mechanism of TR. It indicates that adding anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy to trastuzumab-based treatment may be a good alternative for overcoming TR against HER2+ BCs.
Strategies that target the BCSC tumour microenvironment (TME) may be effective since, as was already indicated, it plays a role in the emergence of treatment resistance. Tranilast (the TGF-β inhibitor), when combined with Doxil nanomedicine, improves the TME in a mouse model of TNBC is improved with increased perfusion and oxygenation [98]. This contributes to enhanced anti-tumour immunity with anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. BCSCs are more prevalent in hypoxic conditions where an oxygen-deprived environment is crucial to their proliferation, stemness, and self-renewal. AzCDF, a small molecule, was reported by Kim et al. [99] to target BCSCs in a hypoxic environment, thereby inhibiting tumour growth and reducing tumorigenesis. By reducing the number of BCSCs and preventing cancer cell metastasis, the suppression of TGF-inducible protein expression decreased hypoxia and tumor angiogenesis [100].

4. MUC1 Is a Possible Target to Overcome TR

4.1. Strategies for Mucin Targeting to Overcome TR

MUC1 is a member of the mucin family and plays oncogenic/mitogenic activities in cancer cells, interacting with multiple other oncogenic receptors and pathways, including HER2, β-catenin, NF-kB, and the estrogen receptor (ER). Furthermore, it has been proven that the MUC1 C-terminal domain (MUC1-C) promotes the development of TR and that silencing the MUC1-C proto-oncogene is related to greater susceptibility of HER2+ cells to trastuzumab-induced inhibitors of growth.
Research findings have shown that MUC1 is an excellent antigen for immunotherapy. Firstly, it is found on the surface of a breast tumour. Secondly, malignant MUC1 is hypo-glycosylated, indicating that its core antigen is accessible [101]. Thirdly, malignant MUC1 differs from normal MUC1, which is exclusively overexpressed in cancer cells. The fourth important information is that the MUC1 peptide sequence (PDTRP) is one of the most immunogenic MUC1 epitopes, which is recognized by the SM3mAb, which is an antibody against stripped MUC1 core protein. MUC1 is a good target for mAb, vaccines, and inhibitors because of this epitope [102]. Using anti-MUC1 mAb or siRNA of MUC1 targeting the MUC1 gene would render BC cells vulnerable to trastuzumab-mediated ADCC [103]. The strategies for MUC1 targeting in BC therapy are discussed below in detail. These include both immunotherapeutic and non-immunotherapeutic methods.

4.2. MUC1-Based Therapy Using Mab, Vaccines and CAR T Cells

The anti-MUC1 antibody AS1402 is evaluated in patients with metastatic BC in the Phase-I clinical trial. These individuals were previously treated, developed anthracycline or taxol resistance, and were able to tolerate this antibody [104]. Additionally, researchers have created an anti-MUC1 scFv (single-chain Fragment variable), also known as nanobodies, that bind to BC cells that express MUC1 and prevent their invasion and survival [105]. It was observed that the cytoplasmic domain of MUC1 (MUC1-C) accelerates the development of resistance to trastuzumab, and therefore silencing MUC1-C proto-oncogene is associated with increased sensitivity of HER2+ cells to trastuzumab treatment. In a mouse model of stage IV human BC, a flagella vaccination that targets MUC1 has been tried to decrease metastasis in these animals [106]. Additionally, the clinical trial of PANVAC, a MUC1 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)vaccine, on patients with metastatic BC showed promising results [107]. In the clinical environment, L-BLP25, a peptide vaccine that targets MUC1 and CEA, is being tested on BC patients [108]. After the trial, core biopsies of patients were evaluated for MUC1 by immunohistochemistry (IHC; N = 691) and quantitative RT-PCR. High MUC1 protein and mRNA expression were correlated with a lower probability of pathologic complete response and with longer patient survival. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are engineered T cells that have a transmembrane domain, a signaling domain, and scFv from a particular tumour Ag-Antibody [109]. Targeting MUC1 in cancer has also been done using CAR T cell settings.

5. Overcoming Trastuzumab or HER2-Mediated Therapy via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway

Resistance to HER2-targeted therapy may emerge due to abnormal activation of signalling pathways downstream of the receptor [110]. Since HER2 mediates signal transduction via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, inhibiting components of this pathway may be a feasible strategy to overcome resistance and restore sensitivity to HER2-targeted therapy [111]. The abnormal regulation of PI3K/Akt signalling leads to upregulation of the downstream mTOR pathway, increased mRNA translation, and raised cellular proliferation [112,113], which is mediated by growth factor receptor amplification and loss of the PTEN tumour suppressor [114]. BC models with active PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways demonstrate resistance to HER2-targeted therapies [115], and hyperactivity of the pathway related to BC involves gain-of-function mutations in genes encoding PIK3CA, which encodes the catalytic subunit of PI3K, along with mutations in AKT1 [116]. PTEN was discovered as the major gene out of 8000 evaluated genes whose suppression resulted in TR. The study reveals that in a cohort of 55 BC patients, activation of the PI3K pathway, which is based on the presence of oncogenic PIK3CA mutations or low PTEN expression, was associated with poor prognosis after trastuzumab therapy. Trastuzumab, combined with everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, inhibited the growth of trastuzumab-resistant cells [117]. mTOR is a serine/threonine kinase that controls the signalling pathway of growth factors and hormones, thereby controlling cell growth and angiogenesis. Further, combining therapy with an mTOR inhibitor and trastuzumab was more effective in inhibiting tumour growth than monotherapy [118]. Other mTOR, PI3K, and dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors, including NVP-BKM120, GDC-0941, NVP-BEZ235, and INK-128, have restored sensitivity to HER2-targeted therapy in cell culture-based and in vivo models of BC [119]. A phase 1b dose-escalation study of everolimus, trastuzumab, and paclitaxel involved 33 patients with trastuzumab-resistant metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. The therapy reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 44%, a disease control rate of 74%, and a median PFS of 34 weeks, much better than monotherapy of trastuzumab [120]. The combination of HER2-targeted therapies and BAY 80-6946 (a PI3K inhibitor) inhibited BC growth more effectively than either monotherapy. The combination restores sensitivity to trastuzumab and lapatinib in cells resistant to either drug [121].

7. Trastuzumab Resistance and Role of CD74-Akt Signaling Axis

CD74 is a protein that acts as a chaperone for MHC class II molecules, helping in antigen presentation. Further, it also acts as a receptor for macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), a cytokine that regulates immune responses. The binding of MIF to CD74 activates several signalling pathways, including the AKT signalling pathway, especially in TNBC. Therefore, these signalling effects on cell survival, proliferation, and inflammation are only related to TNBC and not HER2-positive BC. In short, the inhibition of Akt signaling, which promotes BC, reduces the CD74 expression, thereby reducing CD74-MIF interaction. Therefore, the CD74-AKT signalling axis is not directly related to TR or HER2-positive BC therapy. In a study, it was identified that the CD74/AKT signalling axis mediates drug resistance in TNBC and cancer stem cells by inhibiting AKT, which in turn disrupts NF-κB–Bcl-2 survival signalling, leading to decreased caspase activation and apoptosis of cancer cells. AKT inhibitors can inhibit the binding of phosphorylated AKT (with serine 473) to CD74. Combining AKT inhibitors with CD74-derived peptides further enhanced the apoptosis of cancer cells, suggesting a potential therapeutic strategy for chemo-resistant TNBC [125].

8. Trastuzumab Resistance in Contrast to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance

Trastuzumab resistance and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance in HER2-positive BCs exhibit distinct mechanistic differences that reflect their different modes of action [126]. For this reason, the combination therapy including Trastuzumab and different TKIs is frequently used for the treatment of HER2-positive BC. Resistance to TKIs, such as lapatinib, neratinib, and tucatinib, commonly involves the acquisition of specific HER2 kinase domain mutations, most notably the L755S mutation, which reactivates HER2 signalling despite the presence of TKIs [127]. The L755S mutation activates the HER2 protein even in the presence of TKIs, resulting in active signalling through the MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways. The activated HER2 does not bind to reversible TKIs, such as lapatinib, but irreversible TKIs, like neratinib, show some binding efficacy. Significantly, lapatinib and neratinib resistance is associated with HER2 L755S mutation combined with PIK3CA mutations, while tucatinib resistance involves EGFR amplification and heterodimerization with amplified EGFR [128]. Furthermore, TKI resistance mechanisms include the upregulation of conventional drug efflux pumps (ABCB1, ABCC1), which actively efflux small molecule drugs out of cells—a mechanism not relevant for the large antibody, such as trastuzumab [129,130]. Cross-resistance patterns also differ: while lapatinib and neratinib resistance confer cross-resistance to tucatinib due to shared HER2 mutations, these resistant cells may remain sensitive to antibody-based therapies, such as Trastuzumab or T-DM1 [128].
While both resistance types share some common downstream pathway alterations, such as PI3K/AKT hyperactivation and metabolic reprogramming, the molecular basis differs significantly. The trastuzumab resistance primarily involves receptor-level changes and immune evasion, whereas TKI resistance involves kinase domain alterations/mutations and drug metabolism modifications [127,131]. These distinct mechanisms suggest that combination strategies targeting both the receptor expression and downstream pathways, using antibody-based and TKI-based therapies, may help to overcome resistance and improve patient outcomes [128,132].

9. Patents and Clinical Trials of Pre-Trastuzumab Resistance Period

The innovations in antibody engineering (US5821337A), alternate production and diagnostics (US5750176A) advanced the trastuzumab’s efficacy and safety profile. For example, the patent US5821337A, filed by Genentech in 1992, for the first time, uses the concept of humanization of antibodies by replacing the CDR of mouse immunoglobulins with the corresponding human CDR sequence. For the first time, the patent US5750176A, filed by Abbot Laboratories in 1994, uses the concept of transgenic non-human mammals to produce recombinant enzymes and antibodies for better post-translational modifications with reduced immunogenicity. Another crucial patent, EP 0 590 058 B1, filed in 1992, focused on engineering humanized antibodies that bind specifically to the p185HER2 receptor. This patent was foundational in enabling the clinical-grade development of trastuzumab and supported consistent production for large-scale therapeutic use. Patients treated with this trastuzumab alongside chemotherapy showed improved survival and response rates, confirming its effectiveness [133].
The patent US005821.337A, published in 1998, provided detailed methods for producing monoclonal antibodies against p185HER2 using recombinant DNA and hybridoma technology [134]. This patent was crucial for developing HER2 diagnostic assays and reliable antibody production methods, essential for patient enrolment and stratification in clinical trials like NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831 using combination chemotherapy for HER2-positive tumours. This patent influenced the NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831 trials, where trastuzumab was combined with paclitaxel following doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. These clinical trials aimed to find a difference in the efficacy of chemotherapy alone compared to trastuzumab + chemotherapy for HER2+ BC patients. These studies showed substantial improvements in disease-free and OS, highlighting the clinical relevance of combination therapy [135]. The HERA clinical trial (which started in 2001 and finished in 2015) analyzed the effect of trastuzumab therapy for 1–2 years for patients who had completed (neo-)adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, definitive surgery, and radiotherapy earlier, and the follow-up continued for 10–11 years. The results show that treatment with adjuvant trastuzumab for 1 year after chemotherapy, but not in combination, is associated with a significant clinical benefit over treatment alone. These patents and clinical trials form a tightly linked developmental arc for trastuzumab-based therapy for BC, where TR is not addressed.

10. Patents & Clinical Trials During the Period of Trastuzumab Resistance

John L. Bryant patented [136] the use of trastuzumab combined with at least one chemotherapeutic agent as adjuvant therapy to reduce recurrence after surgery and TR. This method demonstrated extended disease-free survival, establishing HER2-targeted antibodies as a cornerstone for preventing relapse. Due to its role in cancer progression, Wyeth LLC patented neratinib (a TKI) in 2010. The efficacy of neratinib was later evaluated in the NALA trial (NCT01808573) [137], a Phase III study comparing neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine in HER2-positive mBC patients previously treated with multiple HER2 therapies with possible relapse or TR. Neratinib improved PFS (8.8 vs. 6.6 months) and reduced CNS interventions, but it increased diarrhoea, highlighting the trade-off between efficacy and manageable toxicity.
Neratinib was selected as one of the agents for the I-SPY 2 trial, which began in 2010. The I-SPY 2 (Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response With Imaging And Molecular Analysis 2) trial (NCT01042379) is a neoadjuvant platform trial designed for newly diagnosed patients with locally advanced (Stage II/III) breast cancer, specifically those with tumor sizes of 2.5 cm or larger [138]. The I-SPY 2 trial, which involves immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy, represents a landmark in trial design for oncology, utilising molecular biomarkers, imaging data, and adaptive methods to tailor therapy and enhance clinical research. Drugs such as Veliparib (PARP inhibitor) with Carboplatin, MK-2206 (AKT inhibitor), Ganitumab (IGF-1R inhibitor), Durvalumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) with Olaparib (PARP inhibitor) and Paclitaxel, and Trebananib were also evaluated in the I-SPY 2 trial as part of its adaptive, biomarker-driven neoadjuvant breast cancer study [139]. In 2012, Roche patented the triple combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and carboplatin-based chemotherapy (including docetaxel) for neoadjuvant treatment of early-stage HER2-positive BC which are confined to the breast or axillary lymph nodes [140]. The landmark CLEOPATRA trial (NCT00567190) confirmed that adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab and docetaxel significantly increased median OS (56.5 vs. 40.8 months) and PFS, transforming first-line treatment for mBC for relapse cases [141]. In 2016, Daiichi Sankyo patented trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), an antibody–drug conjugate linking trastuzumab to the cytotoxic agent DM1, allowing targeted delivery of chemotherapy directly to HER2-overexpressing BC cells [142]. According to NCCN guidelines, the combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and a taxane (such as docetaxel) is now the most common standard of care for patients who have not previously received any anti-HER2 therapy or chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) [143]. The EMILIA trial (NCT00829166) confirmed that T-DM1 significantly improved PFS (9.6 months) and OS (30.9 months) compared to lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients previously treated with trastuzumab and taxanes [144]. The trial also showed lower severe adverse events, underscoring T-DM1’s favourable safety profile. The results of the EMILIA trial established trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) as a standard second-line treatment according to NCCN guidelines for HER2-positive patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who have previously received trastuzumab and taxane combination therapy [145]. The Incyte Corporation patented (US 20200399273A1, 2020) sulfonyl amide-based CDK2 inhibitors to restore sensitivity to trastuzumab by inhibiting CDK2 activity, which was involved in TR. For example, current ongoing trials (NCT04553133, NCT05252416) show the exclusive use of CDK2 inhibitors for clinical trials of metastatic breast cancer patients with relapsed cases. Further, the phase 1 trial has established the maximum tolerated dose for a CDK4/6 inhibitor for metastatic breast cancer patients in a clinical trial with TR.
To improve administration, Genentech patented a subcutaneous fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and recombinant hyaluronidase to allow faster and more convenient delivery compared to intravenous infusions [146]. In the phase 3 study of the FeDeriCa trial, subcutaneous delivery showed the same pharmacokinetic properties and safety profile as intravenous delivery [79]. This improvement makes things easier for patients without making treatment less effective.
In parallel, the exploration of immunotherapy in HER2-positive BC led to the PANACEA trial (NCT02129556) [81], where they studied pembrolizumab, a PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, with trastuzumab for trastuzumab resistance, and it showed high potential by showing 15% ORR.
The HER2CLIMB trial (NCT02614794) investigated tucatinib, a selective HER2 TKI, combined with trastuzumab and capecitabine in heavily pretreated metastatic HER2-positive BC, including patients with active brain metastases [147]. Tucatinib significantly improved PFS (7.8 vs. 5.6 months), OS (21.9 vs. 17.4 months), and delayed CNS disease progression, offering a new effective therapy for patients with CNS involvement, a population with limited options. Both trials have succeeded for relapsed cases, indicating their efficacy against TR.
Most recently, AstraZeneca have started a trial DESTINY-Breast09 (NCT04784715) exploring Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) with or without pertuzumab to see whether patients live longer or get worse compared to standard chemotherapy treatment. Probably at the end of 2029, we will learn how the treatment and cancer affect patients’ lives through this study [148].
Ongoing and already done clinical trial aims are to assess the ORR and safety for patients, which opens the treatment options for patients of different stages of disease. In addition, patents on innovative agents such as recombinant serine protease granzyme B polypeptides with enhanced stability have been filed to target lapatinib or trastuzumab-resistant cancer cells, demonstrating continued efforts to develop novel biologics against TR. Aside from these, in Figure 8, we attempted to outline relevant patents, clinical trials, and products established before and after the development of trastuzumab resistance.
Figure 8. A brief timeline of pre-trastuzumab resistance and post-trastuzumab resistance periods with developed patents, and major clinical trials which led to a few marketed products of trastuzumab. Here, the rectangle with a similar colour code and arrow, together, shows the consequent progress of a patent to clinical trial to a marketed product.

12. Conclusions and Future Directions

It is important to note that in only 20% of BC, the HER2 is overexpressed, whereas the other forms of BC can be due to other factors like angiogenesis via VEGF, cytokine imbalance, chronic inflammation, and changes in TME or oxidative stress, etc. The plasma and serum levels of VEGF are important biomarkers for BC, as it was found that serum and plasma levels of VEGF are higher in mBC than in healthy volunteers [159]. The C-reactive protein (CRP), considered a classic marker for chronic inflammation, was identified in nipple aspirate fluid of healthy women and has been positively correlated to BC risk [160]. The crosstalk of inflammatory cytokines in the TME of BC has identified a few stimulatory cytokines (leptin, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, etc.) or inhibitory (IL-2, IL-12, and IFN-γ) for BC [161]. Higher levels of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine, a common biomarker for ROS-mediated DNA damage, are consistently higher in BCs than in normal cells [162]. This indicates that higher ROS can cause BC. Although all these factors are related to HER2-negative BC, it will be interesting to see the fate of these factors when HER2+ BCs are treated with trastuzumab and/or chemotherapy.
Based on the current market sales, the top 3 Mabs are Humira (adalimumab, which targets TNF-α), Keytruda (pembrolizumab, which binds PD-1), and Stelara (Ustekinumab, which targets IL-12 and IL-23). Among these, Humira and its biosimilars are used to treat various inflammatory diseases, including juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Crohn’s disease (CD), plaque psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), etc. This possibly explains its demand and current market sales [163]. Among the top 20 mAb sales, trastuzumab does not come into the picture, and the mAb, pertuzumab, which acts against HER2+ BC like trastuzumab, is in 11th position with market sales of USD4.4B till 2022 [105]. Nevertheless, pertuzumab binds to domain II of HER2, whereas trastuzumab binds to domain IV. Further, pertuzumab efficiently inhibits ligand-induced HER2/HER3 dimerization, whereas trastuzumab’s significant action is ADCC. The decrease in sales indicates that resistance against trastuzumab is a serious issue, and it is thereby replaced by other antibodies or in combination therapy, where trastuzumab is always combined with other Mab, chemotherapy, and/or tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Based on current patents, the ubiquitin proteosome system was identified as a possible target for HER2+ BC treatment. However, to date, no studies have been carried out using proteosome inhibitors in combination with trastuzumab for overcoming HER2+ BC in a clinical setting.
Two Mabs that act as immune checkpoint inhibitors (Pembrolizumab and Atezolizumab) are combined with Trastuzumab or T-DM1 (ADC of trastuzumab) in clinical trials to treat the TNBC or HER2+ BC, where regular trastuzumab therapy fails [164]. The success of these studies indicates that trastuzumab alone is not recommended for any HER2+ BC therapy because patients generate resistance through different pathways (eg, AKT/PI3K/mTOR, NF-κB, notch signalling, etc.) within 1 year of treatment. Most combination therapy includes TKIs, among which lapatinib, neratinib, and pyrotinib are extensively used, because of several advantages, including oral administration, reduced cardiotoxicity, and favourable blood–brain barrier penetration in BC. Apart from combination therapy, ADCs like Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) are being used for resistance against HER2+ BC, but the success is not better than trastuzumab alone [165]. TR in HER2+ BC overcoming possibly requires a modified Fc-based Trastuzumab with improved ADCC or a better chemotherapeutic agent apart from TKIs, which can be combined with trastuzumab [166].

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation—G.H., S.P., S.S., P.G. and D.M. Methodology and collection of information—G.H., S.S., P.G., S.M.P. and D.M. Writing and original draft preparation—G.H., S.P., S.S., P.G., S.M.P., S.K. and D.M. Writing, reviewing, and editing—G.H., S.S. and D.M. Supervision—G.H., S.P., S.S. and D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. However, the Post-doctoral fellowship of S.M.P. and Master fellowship of G.H., S.S. and P.G. are funded by the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Government of India.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

BCBreast Cancer
BCSCBC stem cell
TRTrastuzumab Resistance
ADCAntibody drug conjugate
ADCCAntibody-directed cellular cytotoxicity
HER2human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
EGFREpidermal growth factor receptor
ErBbErythroblastic oncogene B
EREstrogen receptor
PRProgesterone receptor
PD-L1Programmed Death Ligand 1
PD-1programmed death 1
PFSprogression free survival
OSoverall survival
ORRoverall response rate
MUC1Mucin 1
PI3KPhosphatidyl Inositol 3 Kinase
mTORMammalian target of rapamycin
MAP2K1Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1
TMETumour Micro Environment
TKITyrosine kinase inhibitor
TNBCTriple negative BC
IGF-1RInsulin-like Growth Factor 1 receptor
METMesenchymal epithelial transition
NR2F2Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 2 Group F Member 2
CARChimeric Antigenic Receptor
CEACarcinoembryonic Antigen
CXCL2C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 2
CCND1Cyclin D1
STAT3Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
SLC38A1Solute Carrier Family 38, Member 1
TGF-βTransforming growth factor β

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. DeSantis, C.E.; Ma, J.; Gaudet, M.M.; Newman, L.A.; Miller, K.D.; Goding Sauer, A.; Jemal, A.; Siegel, R.L. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2019, 69, 438–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Schechter, A.L.; Stern, D.F.; Vaidyanathan, L.; Decker, S.J.; Drebin, J.A.; Greene, M.I.; Weinberg, R.A. The neu oncogene: An erb-B-related gene encoding a 185,000-Mr tumour antigen. Nature 1984, 312, 513–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Coussens, L.; Yang-Feng, T.L.; Liao, Y.C.; Chen, E.; Gray, A.; McGrath, J.; Seeburg, P.H.; Libermann, T.A.; Schlessinger, J.; Francke, U. Tyrosine kinase receptor with extensive homology to EGF receptor shares chromosomal location with neu oncogene. Science 1985, 230, 1132–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Drebin, J.A.; Link, V.C.; Weinberg, R.A.; Greene, M.I. Inhibition of tumor growth by a monoclonal antibody reactive with an oncogene-encoded tumor antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 9129–9133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Slamon, D.J.; Clark, G.M.; Wong, S.G.; Levin, W.J.; Ullrich, A.; McGuire, W.L. Human breast cancer: Correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 1987, 235, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Hudziak, R.M.; Lewis, G.D.; Winget, M.; Fendly, B.M.; Shepard, H.M.; Ullrich, A. p185HER2 monoclonal antibody has antiproliferative effects in vitro and sensitizes human breast tumor cells to tumor necrosis factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1989, 9, 1165–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  8. Carter, P.; Presta, L.; Gorman, C.M.; Ridgway, J.B.; Henner, D.; Wong, W.L.; Rowland, A.M.; Kotts, C.; Carver, M.E.; Shepard, H.M. Humanization of an anti-p185HER2 antibody for human cancer therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 4285–4289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  9. Eiermann, W.; International Herceptin Study Group. Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: Pivotal trial data. Ann. Oncol. 2001, 12 (Suppl. S1), S57–S62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  10. Marty, M.; Cognetti, F.; Maraninchi, D.; Snyder, R.; Mauriac, L.; Tubiana-Hulin, M.; Chan, S.; Grimes, D.; Antón, A.; Lluch, A.; et al. Randomized phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab combined with docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer administered as first-line treatment: The M77001 study group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23, 4265–4274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Kovacs, E.; Zorn, J.A.; Huang, Y.; Barros, T.; Kuriyan, J. A structural perspective on the regulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2015, 84, 739–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Harris, L.N.; You, F.; Schnitt, S.J.; Witkiewicz, A.; Lu, X.; Sgroi, D.; Ryan, P.D.; Come, S.E.; Burstein, H.J.; Lesnikoski, B.A.; et al. Predictors of resistance to preoperative trastuzumab and vinorelbine for HER2-positive early breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 1198–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Wolff, A.C.; Somerfield, M.R.; Dowsett, M.; Hammond, M.E.H.; Hayes, D.F.; McShane, L.M.; Saphner, T.J.; Spears, P.A.; Allison, K.H. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO-College of American Pathologists Guideline Update. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 41, 3867–3872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Vu, T.; Claret, F.X. Trastuzumab: Updated mechanisms of action and resistance in breast cancer. Front. Oncol. 2012, 2, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Scott, G.K.; Robles, R.; Park, J.W.; Montgomery, P.A.; Daniel, J.; Holmes, W.E.; Lee, J.; Keller, G.A.; Li, W.L.; Fendly, B.M. A truncated intracellular HER2/neu receptor produced by alternative RNA processing affects growth of human carcinoma cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1993, 13, 2247–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Christianson, T.A.; Doherty, J.K.; Lin, Y.J.; Ramsey, E.E.; Holmes, R.; Keenan, E.J.; Clinton, G.M. NH2-terminally truncated HER-2/neu protein: Relationship with shedding of the extracellular domain and with prognostic factors in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 5123–5129. [Google Scholar]
  17. Scaltriti, M.; Rojo, F.; Ocaña, A.; Anido, J.; Guzman, M.; Cortes, J.; Di Cosimo, S.; Matias-Guiu, X.; Ramon y Cajal, S.; Arribas, J.; et al. Expression of p95HER2, a truncated form of the HER2 receptor, and response to anti-HER2 therapies in breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2007, 99, 628–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. Arribas, J.; Baselga, J.; Pedersen, K.; Parra-Palau, J.L. p95HER2 and breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 1515–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Sperinde, J.; Jin, X.; Banerjee, J.; Penuel, E.; Saha, A.; Diedrich, G.; Huang, W.; Leitzel, K.; Weidler, J.; Ali, S.M.; et al. Quantitation of p95HER2 in paraffin sections by using a p95-specific antibody and correlation with outcome in a cohort of trastuzumab-treated breast cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 4226–4235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Munzone, E.; Curigliano, G.; Rocca, A.; Bonizzi, G.; Renne, G.; Goldhirsch, A.; Nolè, F. Reverting estrogen-receptor-negative phenotype in HER-2-overexpressing advanced breast cancer patients exposed to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2006, 8, R4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Pegram, M.; Jackisch, C.; Johnston, S.R.D. Estrogen/HER2 receptor crosstalk in breast cancer: Combination therapies to improve outcomes for patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023, 9, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Liang, Y.; Liu, X.; Yun, Z.; Li, K.; Li, H. Endocrine therapy plus HER2-targeted therapy, another favorable option for HR+/HER2+ advanced breast cancer patients. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2024, 16, 17588359231220501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Llombart-Cussac, A.; Cortés, J.; Paré, L.; Galván, P.; Bermejo, B.; Martínez, N.; Vidal, M.; Pernas, S.; López, R.; Muñoz, M.; et al. HER2-enriched subtype as a predictor of pathological complete response following trastuzumab and lapatinib without chemotherapy in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (PAMELA): An open-label, single-group, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Rimawi, M.; Ferrero, J.M.; de la Haba-Rodriguez, J.; Poole, C.; De Placido, S.; Osborne, C.K.; Hegg, R.; Easton, V.; Wohlfarth, C.; Arpino, G.; et al. First-Line Trastuzumab Plus an Aromatase Inhibitor, with or Without Pertuzumab, in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive and Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (PERTAIN): A Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 2826–2835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Musolino, A.; Gradishar, W.J.; Rugo, H.S.; Nordstrom, J.L.; Rock, E.P.; Arnaldez, F.; Pegram, M.D. Role of Fcγ receptors in HER2-targeted breast cancer therapy. J. Immunother. Cancer 2022, 10, e003171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Wu, D.; Tang, S.; Ye, R.; Li, D.; Gu, D.; Chen, R.; Zhang, H.; Sun, J.; Chen, Z. Case Report: Long-Term Response to Pembrolizumab Combined with Endocrine Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients with Hormone Receptor Expression. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 610149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Clynes, R.A.; Towers, T.L.; Presta, L.G.; Ravetch, J.V. Inhibitory Fc receptors modulate in vivo cytotoxicity against tumor targets. Nat. Med. 2000, 6, 443–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Nimmerjahn, F.; Ravetch, J.V. Fcgamma receptors as regulators of immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 34–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  29. Nordstrom, J.L.; Gorlatov, S.; Zhang, W.; Yang, Y.; Huang, L.; Burke, S.; Li, H.; Ciccarone, V.; Zhang, T.; Stavenhagen, J.; et al. Anti-tumor activity and toxicokinetics analysis of MGAH22, an anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody with enhanced Fcγ receptor binding properties. Breast Cancer Res. 2011, 13, R123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  30. Modi, S.; Jacot, W.; Yamashita, T.; Sohn, J.; Vidal, M.; Tokunaga, E.; Tsurutani, J.; Ueno, N.T.; Prat, A.; Chae, Y.S.; et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Low Advanced Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 387, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  31. Petricevic, B.; Laengle, J.; Singer, J.; Sachet, M.; Fazekas, J.; Steger, G.; Bartsch, R.; Jensen-Jarolim, E.; Bergmann, M.; Bergmann, M. Trastuzumab mediates antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and phagocytosis to the same extent in both adjuvant and metastatic HER2/neu breast cancer patients. J. Transl. Med. 2013, 11, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Parihar, R. Characterization of the Natural Killer Cell Cytokine Response to Antibody-Coated Tumor Cells. Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  33. Xu, J.; Ding, L.; Mei, J.; Hu, Y.; Kong, X.; Dai, S.; Ding, K. Dual roles and therapeutic targeting of tumor-associated macrophages in tumor microenvironments. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2025, 10, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Nong, C.; Guan, P.; Li, L.; Zhang, H.; Hu, H. Tumor immunotherapy: Mechanisms and clinical applications. MedComm–Oncol. 2022, 1, e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Yu, J.; Li, S.; Chen, D.; Liu, D.; Guo, H.; Yang, C.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, G.; Tu, X.; et al. SIRPα-Fc fusion protein IMM01 exhibits dual anti-tumor activities by targeting CD47/SIRPα signal pathway via blocking the “don’t eat me” signal and activating the “eat me” signal. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2022, 15, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  36. Li, F.; Liu, S. Focusing on NK cells and ADCC: A promising immunotherapy approach in targeted therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1083462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Upton, R.; Banuelos, A.; Feng, D.; Biswas, T.; Kao, K.; McKenna, K.; Willingham, S.; Ho, P.Y.; Rosental, B.; Tal, M.C.; et al. Combining CD47 blockade with trastuzumab eliminates HER2-positive breast cancer cells and overcomes trastuzumab tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2026849118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Bonneau, D.; Longy, M. Mutations of the human PTEN gene. Hum. Mutat. 2000, 16, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Sansal, I.; Sellers, W.R. The biology and clinical relevance of the PTEN tumor suppressor pathway. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004, 22, 2954–2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Nahta, R.; Yu, D.; Hung, M.C.; Hortobagyi, G.N.; Esteva, F.J. Mechanisms of disease: Understanding resistance to HER2-targeted therapy in human breast cancer. Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol. 2006, 3, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Fiszman, G.L.; Jasnis, M.A. Molecular Mechanisms of Trastuzumab Resistance in HER2 Overexpressing Breast Cancer. Int. J. Breast Cancer 2011, 2011, 352182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  42. Pandolfi, P.P. Breast cancer-loss of PTEN predicts resistance to treatment. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 2337–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Berns, K.; Horlings, H.M.; Hennessy, B.T.; Madiredjo, M.; Hijmans, E.M.; Beelen, K.; Linn, S.C.; Gonzalez-Angulo, A.M.; Stemke-Hale, K.; Hauptmann, M.; et al. A functional genetic approach identifies the PI3K pathway as a major determinant of trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. Cancer Cell 2007, 12, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Saal, L.H.; Holm, K.; Maurer, M.; Memeo, L.; Su, T.; Wang, X.; Yu, J.S.; Malmström, P.O.; Mansukhani, M.; Enoksson, J.; et al. PIK3CA mutations correlate with hormone receptors, node metastasis, and ERBB2, and are mutually exclusive with PTEN loss in human breast carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 2554–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Stemke-Hale, K.; Gonzalez-Angulo, A.M.; Lluch, A.; Neve, R.M.; Kuo, W.L.; Davies, M.; Carey, M.; Hu, Z.; Guan, Y.; Sahin, A.; et al. An integrative genomic and proteomic analysis of PIK3CA, PTEN, and AKT mutations in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 6084–6091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Chen, Q.; Xu, L.; Chen, J.; Yang, Z.; Liang, C.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Z. Tumor vasculature normalization by orally fed erlotinib to modulate the tumor microenvironment for enhanced cancer nanomedicine and immunotherapy. Biomaterials 2017, 148, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Baker, A.; Wyatt, D.; Bocchetta, M.; Li, J.; Filipovic, A.; Green, A.; Peiffer, D.S.; Fuqua, S.; Miele, L.; Albain, K.S.; et al. Notch-1-PTEN-ERK1/2 signaling axis promotes HER2+ breast cancer cell proliferation and stem cell survival. Oncogene 2018, 37, 4489–4504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  48. Jiang, L.; Ren, L.; Chen, H.; Pan, J.; Zhang, Z.; Kuang, X.; Chen, X.; Bao, W.; Lin, C.; Zhou, Z.; et al. NCAPG confers trastuzumab resistance via activating SRC/STAT3 signaling pathway in HER2-positive breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  49. Sherr, C.J.; Roberts, J.M. CDK inhibitors: Positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 1999, 13, 1501–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  50. Philipp-Staheli, J.; Payne, S.R.; Kemp, C.J. p27(Kip1): Regulation and function of a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor and its misregulation in cancer. Exp. Cell Res. 2001, 264, 148–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Le, X.F.; Claret, F.X.; Lammayot, A.; Tian, L.; Deshpande, D.; LaPushin, R.; Tari, A.M.; Bast, R.C., Jr. The role of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1 in anti-HER2 antibody-induced G1 cell cycle arrest and tumor growth inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 23441–23450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Elsheikh, S.E.; Green, A.R.; Rakha, E.A.; Powe, D.G.; Ahmed, R.A.; Collins, H.M.; Soria, D.; Garibaldi, J.M.; Paish, C.E.; Ammar, A.A.; et al. Global histone modifications in breast cancer correlate with tumor phenotypes, prognostic factors, and patient outcome. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 3802–3809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Nami, B.; Ghanaeian, A.; Black, C.; Wang, Z. Epigenetic silencing of HER2 expression during epithelial-mesenchymal transition leads to trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. Life 2021, 11, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Edwards, J.R.; Yarychkivska, O.; Boulard, M.; Bestor, T.H. DNA methylation and DNA methyltransferases. Epigenetics Chromatin 2017, 10, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Palomeras, S.; Lagares, Á.D.; Blancafort, A.; Sarrats, A.; Martinez, A.C.; Sandoval, J.; Rabionet, M.; Welm, A.L.; Esteller, M.; Puig, T. DNA methylation signature to identify trastuzumab response in HER2 breast cancer models. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, i12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Palomeras, S.; Diaz-Lagares, Á.; Viñas, G.; Setien, F.; Ferreira, H.J.; Oliveras, G.; Crujeiras, A.B.; Hernández, A.; Lum, D.H.; Welm, A.L.; et al. Epigenetic silencing of TGFBI confers resistance to trastuzumab in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2019, 21, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Rupaimoole, R.; Slack, F.J. MicroRNA therapeutics: Towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017, 16, 203–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  58. Ha, M.; Kim, V.N. Regulation of microRNA biogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 509–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  59. Deng, Y.; Ma, W. Metformin inhibits HaCaT cell viability via the miR-21/PTEN/Akt signaling pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 17, 4062–4066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  60. Yang, F.; Fu, Z.; Yang, M.; Sun, C.; Li, Y.; Chu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, W.; Huang, X.; Li, J.; et al. Expression pattern of microRNAs related with response to trastuzumab in breast cancer. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 16102–16113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Rezaei, Z.; Dastjerdi, K.; Allahyari, A.; ShahidSales, S.; Talebian, S.; Maharati, A.; Zangooie, A.; Zangouei, A.S.; Sadri, F.; Sargazi, S. Plasma microRNA-195,−34c, and −1246 as novel biomarkers for the diagnosis of trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2023, 475, 116652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Lu, Y.; Zi, X.; Zhao, Y.; Mascarenhas, D.; Pollak, M. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor signaling and resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin). J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001, 93, 1852–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Jerome, L.; Alami, N.; Belanger, S.; Page, V.; Yu, Q.; Paterson, J.; Shiry, L.; Pegram, M.; Leyland-Jones, B. Recombinant human insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 inhibits growth of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-overexpressing breast tumors and potentiates herceptin activity in vivo. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 7245–7252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  64. Liu, B.; Fan, Z.; Edgerton, S.M.; Yang, X.; Lind, S.E.; Thor, A.D. Potent anti-proliferative effects of metformin on trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer cells via inhibition of erbB2/IGF-1 receptor interactions. Cell Cycle 2011, 10, 2959–2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Nahta, R.; Yuan, L.X.; Zhang, B.; Kobayashi, R.; Esteva, F.J. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 heterodimerization contributes to trastuzumab resistance of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 11118–11128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Lorenzano Menna, P.; Cardama, G.A.; Comin, M.J.; Alonso, D.F.; Gómez, D.E. Rho GTPasas como blancos terapéuticos relevantes en cáncer y otras enfermedades humanas [Rho GTPases as therapeutic targets in cancer and other human diseases]. Medicina 2010, 70, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Humphries, B.; Wang, Z.; Yang, C. Rho GTPases: Big Players in Breast Cancer Initiation, Metastasis and Therapeutic Responses. Cells 2020, 9, 2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Rivas, M.A.; Tkach, M.; Beguelin, W.; Proietti, C.J.; Rosemblit, C.; Charreau, E.H.; Elizalde, P.V.; Schillaci, R. Transactivation of ErbB-2 induced by tumor necrosis factor alpha promotes NF-kappaB activation and breast cancer cell proliferation. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2010, 122, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Li, Y.; Kong, X.; Xuan, L.; Wang, Z.; Huang, Y.H. Prolactin and endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer: The next potential hope for breast cancer treatment. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 10327–10348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Mercogliano, M.F.; Bruni, S.; Elizalde, P.V.; Schillaci, R. Tumor Necrosis Factor α Blockade: An Opportunity to Tackle Breast Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  71. Mercogliano, M.F.; De Martino, M.; Venturutti, L.; Rivas, M.A.; Proietti, C.J.; Inurrigarro, G.; Frahm, I.; Allemand, D.H.; Deza, E.G.; Ares, S.; et al. TNFα-Induced Mucin 4 Expression Elicits Trastuzumab Resistance in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 636–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  72. Velasco-Velázquez, M.A.; Popov, V.M.; Lisanti, M.P.; Pestell, R.G. The role of breast cancer stem cells in metastasis and therapeutic implications. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 179, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Bozorgi, A.; Khazaei, M.; Khazaei, M.R. New Findings on Breast Cancer Stem Cells: A Review. J. Breast Cancer 2015, 18, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  74. Nagata, Y.; Lan, K.H.; Zhou, X.; Tan, M.; Esteva, F.J.; Sahin, A.A.; Klos, K.S.; Li, P.; Monia, B.P.; Nguyen, N.T.; et al. PTEN activation contributes to tumor inhibition by trastuzumab, and loss of PTEN predicts trastuzumab resistance in patients. Cancer Cell 2004, 6, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  75. Application of Melatonin in Preparation of Drug for Treating HER2 Positive Breast Cancer Resistant to Targeted Drug. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=CN326496984&_cid=P22-LTQ4L2-21446-1#detailMainForm:MyTabViewId:NATIONALBIBLIO (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  76. Junttila, T.T.; Akita, R.W.; Parsons, K.; Fields, C.; Lewis Phillips, G.D.; Friedman, L.S.; Sampath, D.; Sliwkowski, M.X. Ligand-independent HER2/HER3/PI3K complex is disrupted by trastuzumab and is effectively inhibited by the PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941. Cancer Cell 2009, 15, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  77. Kim, J.Y.; Cho, Y.; Oh, E.; Lee, N.; An, H.; Sung, D.; Cho, T.M.; Seo, J.H. Disulfiram targets cancer stem-like properties and the HER2/Akt signaling pathway in HER2-positive breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2016, 379, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Magnifico, A.; Albano, L.; Campaner, S.; Delia, D.; Castiglioni, F.; Gasparini, P.; Sozzi, G.; Fontanella, E.; Menard, S.; Tagliabue, E. Tumor-initiating cells of HER2-positive carcinoma cell lines express the highest oncoprotein levels and are sensitive to trastuzumab. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 2010–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  79. Tan, A.R.; Im, S.A.; Mattar, A.; Colomer, R.; Stroyakovskii, D.; Nowecki, Z.; De Laurentiis, M.; Pierga, J.Y.; Jung, K.H.; Schem, C.; et al. Fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection plus chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer (FeDeriCa): A randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 study. Lancet. Oncol. 2021, 22, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  80. Korkaya, H.; Paulson, A.; Iovino, F.; Wicha, M.S. HER2 regulates the mammary stem/progenitor cell population driving tumorigenesis and invasion. Oncogene 2008, 27, 6120–6130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  81. ClinicalTrials.gov. Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody in Advanced, Trastuzumab-Resistant, HER2-Positive Breast Cancer (PANACEA). Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02129556 (accessed on 28 July 2025).
  82. Chakrabarty, A.; Bhola, N.E.; Sutton, C.; Ghosh, R.; Kuba, M.G.; Dave, B.; Chang, J.C.; Arteaga, C.L. Trastuzumab-resistant cells rely on a HER2-PI3K-FoxO-survivin axis and are sensitive to PI3K inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 1190–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  83. Du, L.; Yamamoto, S.; Burnette, B.L.; Huang, D.; Gao, K.; Jamshidi, N.; Kuo, M.D. Transcriptome profiling reveals novel gene expression signatures and regulating transcription factors of TGFβ-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Med. 2016, 5, 1962–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. Tojo, M.; Hamashima, Y.; Hanyu, A.; Kajimoto, T.; Saitoh, M.; Miyazono, K.; Node, M.; Imamura, T. The ALK-5 inhibitor A-83-01 inhibits Smad signaling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by transforming growth factor-beta. Cancer Sci. 2005, 96, 791–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  85. Loh, Y.N.; Hedditch, E.L.; Baker, L.A.; Jary, E.; Ward, R.L.; Ford, C.E. The Wnt signalling pathway is upregulated in an in vitro model of acquired tamoxifen resistant breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2013, 13, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  86. Wu, Y.; Ginther, C.; Kim, J.; Mosher, N.; Chung, S.; Slamon, D.; Vadgama, J.V. Expression of Wnt3 activates Wnt/β-catenin pathway and promotes EMT-like phenotype in trastuzumab-resistant HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Res. 2012, 10, 1597–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  87. Chung, S.S.; Giehl, N.; Wu, Y.; Vadgama, J.V. STAT3 activation in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell traits. Int. J. Oncol. 2013, 44, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  88. Nagy, P.; Friedländer, E.; Tanner, M.; Kapanen, A.I.; Carraway, K.L.; Isola, J.; Jovin, T.M. Decreased accessibility and lack of activation of ErbB2 in JIMT-1, a herceptin-resistant, MUC4-expressing breast cancer cell line. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 473–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  89. Wu, G.; Li, L.; Qiu, Y.; Sun, W.; Ren, T.; Lv, Y.; Liu, M.; Wang, X.; Tao, H.; Zhao, L.; et al. A novel humanized MUC1 antibody-drug conjugate for the treatment of trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2021, 53, 1625–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. Wong, A.L.; Lee, S.C. Mechanisms of Resistance to Trastuzumab and Novel Therapeutic Strategies in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Int. J. Breast Cancer 2012, 2012, 415170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  91. Fessler, S.P.; Wotkowicz, M.T.; Mahanta, S.K.; Bamdad, C. MUC1* is a determinant of trastuzumab (Herceptin) resistance in breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2009, 118, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  92. Nicolini, A.; Ferrari, P. Targeted therapies and drug resistance in advanced breast cancer, alternative strategies and the way beyond. Cancers 2024, 16, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  93. Sheng, T.; Sundar, R.; Srivastava, S.; Ong, X.; Tay, S.T.; Ma, H.; Uchihara, T.; Lian, B.S.X.; Hagihara, T.; Xu, C.; et al. Spatial profiling of Patient-Matched HER2 positive gastric cancer reveals resistance mechanisms to Trastuzumab and Trastuzumab Deruxtecan. medRxiv 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  94. Martin-Castillo, B.; Verdura, S.; Llop-Hernández, À.; Lupu, R.; Cuyàs, E.; Menendez, J.A. Metabolic hallmarks of trastuzumab resistance. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2025, 29, 457–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  95. O’Neal, J.; Clem, A.; Reynolds, L.; Dougherty, S.; Imbert-Fernandez, Y.; Telang, S.; Chesney, J.; Clem, B.F. Inhibition of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase (PFKFB3) suppresses glucose metabolism and the growth of HER2+ breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2016, 160, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  96. Almozyan, S.; Colak, D.; Mansour, F.; Alaiya, A.; Al-Harazi, O.; Qattan, A.; Al-Mohanna, F.; Al-Alwan, M.; Ghebeh, H. PD-L1 promotes OCT4 and Nanog expression in breast cancer stem cells by sustaining PI3K/AKT pathway activation. Int. J. Cancer 2017, 141, 1402–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  97. Chaganty, B.K.R.; Qiu, S.; Gest, A.; Lu, Y.; Ivan, C.; Calin, G.A.; Weiner, L.M.; Fan, Z. Trastuzumab upregulates PD-L1 as a potential mechanism of trastuzumab resistance through engagement of immune effector cells and stimulation of IFNγ secretion. Cancer Lett. 2018, 430, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  98. Panagi, M.; Voutouri, C.; Mpekris, F.; Papageorgis, P.; Martin, M.R.; Martin, J.D.; Demetriou, P.; Pierides, C.; Polydorou, C.; Stylianou, A.; et al. TGF-β inhibition combined with cytotoxic nanomedicine normalizes triple negative breast cancer microenvironment towards anti-tumor immunity. Theranostics 2020, 10, 1910–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  99. Kim, J.H.; Verwilst, P.; Won, M.; Lee, J.; Sessler, J.L.; Han, J.; Kim, J.S. A Small Molecule Strategy for Targeting Cancer Stem Cells in Hypoxic Microenvironments and Preventing Tumorigenesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 14115–14124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  100. Fico, F.; Santamaria-Martínez, A. TGFBI modulates tumour hypoxia and promotes breast cancer metastasis. Mol. Oncol. 2020, 14, 3198–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  101. Curry, J.M.; Besmer, D.M.; Erick, T.K.; Steuerwald, N.; Das Roy, L.; Grover, P.; Rao, S.; Nath, S.; Ferrier, J.W.; Reid, R.W.; et al. Indomethacin enhances anti-tumor efficacy of a MUC1 peptide vaccine against breast cancer in MUC1 transgenic mice. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  102. Bermejo, I.A.; Navo, C.D.; Castro-López, J.; Guerreiro, A.; Jiménez-Moreno, E.; Sánchez Fernández, E.M.; García-Martín, F.; Hinou, H.; Nishimura, S.I.; García Fernández, J.M.; et al. Synthesis, conformational analysis and in vivo assays of an anti-cancer vaccine that features an unnatural antigen based on an sp2-iminosugar fragment. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 3996–4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  103. Namba, M.; Hattori, N.; Hamada, H.; Yamaguchi, K.; Okamoto, Y.; Nakashima, T.; Masuda, T.; Sakamoto, S.; Horimasu, Y.; Miyamoto, S.; et al. Anti-KL-6/MUC1 monoclonal antibody reverses resistance to trastuzumab-mediated antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity by capping MUC1. Cancer Lett. 2019, 442, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  104. Pegram, M.D.; Borges, V.F.; Ibrahim, N.; Fuloria, J.; Shapiro, C.; Perez, S.; Wang, K.; Schaedli Stark, F.; Courtenay Luck, N. Phase I dose escalation pharmacokinetic assessment of intravenous humanized anti-MUC1 antibody AS1402 in patients with advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2009, 11, R73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  105. Kim, M.J.; Choi, J.R.; Tae, N.; Wi, T.M.; Kim, K.M.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, E.S. Novel Antibodies Targeting MUC1-C Showed Anti-Metastasis and Growth-Inhibitory Effects on Human Breast Cancer Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  106. Machluf, N.; Arnon, R. Therapeutic MUC1-based cancer vaccine expressed in flagella-efficacy in an aggressive model of breast cancer. World J. Vaccines 2012, 2, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mohebtash, M.; Tsang, K.Y.; Madan, R.A.; Huen, N.Y.; Poole, D.J.; Jochems, C.; Jones, J.; Ferrara, T.; Heery, C.R.; Arlen, P.M.; et al. A pilot study of MUC-1/CEA/TRICOM poxviral-based vaccine in patients with metastatic breast and ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 7164–7173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  108. Sinn, B.V.; Von Minckwitz, G.; Denkert, C.; Eidtmann, H.; Darb-Esfahani, S.; Tesch, H.; Kronenwett, R.; Hoffmann, G.; Belau, A.; Thommsen, C.; et al. Evaluation of Mucin-1 protein and mRNA expression as prognostic and predictive markers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2013, 24, 2316–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  109. Zhou, R.; Yazdanifar, M.; Roy, L.D.; Whilding, L.M.; Gavrill, A.; Maher, J.; Mukherjee, P. CAR T cells targeting the tumor MUC1 glycoprotein reduce triple-negative breast cancer growth. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  110. Eichhorn, P.J.; Gili, M.; Scaltriti, M.; Serra, V.; Guzman, M.; Nijkamp, W.; Beijersbergen, R.L.; Valero, V.; Seoane, J.; Bernards, R.; et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase hyperactivation results in lapatinib resistance that is reversed by the mTOR/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor NVP-BEZ235. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 9221–9230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  111. Hurvitz, S.A.; Hu, Y.; O’Brien, N.; Finn, R.S. Current approaches and future directions in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2013, 39, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  112. Margariti, N.; Fox, S.B.; Bottini, A.; Generali, D. “Overcoming breast cancer drug resistance with mTOR inhibitors”. Could it be a myth or a real possibility in the short-term future? Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 128, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  113. Yuan, R.; Kay, A.; Berg, W.J.; Lebwohl, D. Targeting tumorigenesis: Development and use of mTOR inhibitors in cancer therapy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2009, 2, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  114. De Martino, M.C.; van Koetsveld, P.M.; Pivonello, R.; Hofland, L.J. Role of the mTOR pathway in normal and tumoral adrenal cells. Neuroendocrinology 2010, 92 (Suppl. S1), 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  115. Keck, S.; Glencer, A.C.; Rugo, H.S. Everolimus and its role in hormone-resistant and trastuzumab-resistant metastatic breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2012, 8, 1383–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  116. Mayer, I. Role of mTOR inhibition in preventing resistance and restoring sensitivity to hormone-targeted and HER2-targeted therapies in breast cancer. Clin. Adv. Hematol. Oncol. 2013, 11, 217–224. [Google Scholar]
  117. Lu, C.H.; Wyszomierski, S.L.; Tseng, L.M.; Sun, M.H.; Lan, K.H.; Neal, C.L.; Mills, G.B.; Hortobagyi, G.N.; Esteva, F.J.; Yu, D. Preclinical testing of clinically applicable strategies for overcoming trastuzumab resistance caused by PTEN deficiency. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 5883–5888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  118. Miller, T.W.; Forbes, J.T.; Shah, C.; Wyatt, S.K.; Manning, H.C.; Olivares, M.G.; Sanchez, V.; Dugger, T.C.; de Matos Granja, N.; Narasanna, A.; et al. Inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin is required for optimal antitumor effect of HER2 inhibitors against HER2-overexpressing cancer cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 7266–7276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  119. Maira, S.M.; Pecchi, S.; Huang, A.; Burger, M.; Knapp, M.; Sterker, D.; Schnell, C.; Guthy, D.; Nagel, T.; Wiesmann, M.; et al. Identification and characterization of NVP-BKM120, an orally available pan-class I PI3-kinase inhibitor. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2012, 11, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  120. Andre, F.; Campone, M.; O’Regan, R.; Manlius, C.; Massacesi, C.; Sahmoud, T.; Mukhopadhyay, P.; Soria, J.C.; Naughton, M.; Hurvitz, S.A. Phase I study of everolimus plus weekly paclitaxel and trastuzumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer pretreated with trastuzumab. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 5110–5115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  121. Elster, N.; Cremona, M.; Morgan, C.; Toomey, S.; Carr, A.; O’Grady, A.; Hennessy, B.T.; Eustace, A.J. A preclinical evaluation of the PI3K alpha/delta dominant inhibitor BAY 80-6946 in HER2-positive breast cancer models with acquired resistance to the HER2-targeted therapies trastuzumab and lapatinib. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2015, 149, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  122. Rocca, A.; Braga, L.; Volpe, M.C.; Maiocchi, S.; Generali, D. The predictive and prognostic role of RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK pathway alterations in breast cancer: Revision of the literature and comparison with the analysis of cancer genomic datasets. Cancers 2022, 14, 5306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  123. Vernimmen, D.; Gueders, M.; Pisvin, S.; Delvenne, P.; Winkler, R. Different mechanisms are implicated in ERBB2 gene overexpression in breast and in other cancers. Br. J. Cancer 2003, 89, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  124. Hasegawa, T.; Adachi, R.; Iwakata, H.; Takeno, T.; Sato, K.; Sakamaki, T. ErbB2 signaling epigenetically suppresses micro RNA-205 transcription via Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in breast cancer. FEBS Open Bio 2017, 7, 1154–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  125. Wang, J.; Huang, D.; Nguyen, T.A.T.; Phan, L.M.; Wei, W.; Rezaeian, A.H. CD74-AKT axis is a potential therapeutic target in triple-negative breast cancer. Biology 2024, 13, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  126. Júnior, A.H.; Cima, B.P.; Staffen, M.D.; Lindenau, J.D.R.; Netto Muniz, Y.C. A Review and Meta-analysis on Trastuzumab Resistance in Patients with HER2+ Breast Cancer. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2023, 23, 1222–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  127. Liao, F.T.; Qin, L.; Shea, M.J.; Gordon, T.; Nanda, S.; Sabotta, C.M.; Raghavan, A.; Liu, C.C.; Gutierrez, C.; Rimawi, M.F.; et al. Abstract P3-04-27: Resistance to neratinib in HER2+ breast cancer: Mechanistic insights and treatment approaches. Clin. Cancer Res. 2025, 31 (Suppl. S12), P3-04. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  128. Veeraraghavan, J.; Bose, S.; Mistry, R.; Selenica, P.; Nanda, S.; Qin, L.; Gazzo, A.; Zhu, Y.; Mancini, M.A.; Stossi, F.; et al. Abstract PD8-06: Acquired resistance to tucatinib is associated with EGFR amplification in HER2+ breast cancer (BC) models and can be overcome by a more complete blockade of HER receptor layer. Cancer Res. 2022, 82 (Suppl. S4), PD8-06. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  129. Sledge, G.; Xiu, J.; Mahtani, R.L.; Sandoval Leon, A.C.; Oberley, M.J.; Radovich, M.; Spetzler, D. Abstract PS13-09: Mechanisms of Resistance to Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Breast Cancer Elucidated by Multi-omic Molecular Profiling. Clin. Cancer Res. 2025, 31 (Suppl. S12), PS13-09. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  130. Li, G.; Guo, J.; Shen, B.Q.; Yadav, D.B.; Sliwkowski, M.X.; Crocker, L.M.; Lacap, J.A.; Phillips, G.D.L. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to trastuzumab emtansine in breast cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2018, 17, 1441–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  131. Parsons, H.A.; Messer, C.; Santos, K.; Danysh, B.P.; Hughes, M.E.; Patel, A.; Jacobs, R.A.; Slowik, K.; Hess, J.; Stewart, C.; et al. Genomic mechanisms of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (HER2+ MBC). Cancer Res. 2023, 83 (Suppl. S7), 3874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  132. Collins, D.M.; Conlon, N.T.; Kannan, S.; Verma, C.S.; Eli, L.D.; Lalani, A.S.; Crown, J. Preclinical characteristics of the irreversible pan-HER kinase inhibitor neratinib compared with lapatinib: Implications for the treatment of HER2-positive and HER2-mutated breast cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  133. Slamon, D.J.; Leyland-Jones, B.; Shak, S.; Fuchs, H.; Paton, V.; Bajamonde, A.; Fleming, T.; Eiermann, W.; Wolter, J.; Pegram, M.; et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 783–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  134. National Center for Biotechnology Information PubChem Patent Summary for US-5821337-A, Immunoglobulin variants. 2025. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-5821337-A (accessed on 28 July 2025).
  135. Perez, E.A.; Romond, E.H.; Suman, V.J.; Jeong, J.H.; Davidson, N.E.; Geyer, C.E., Jr.; Martino, S.; Mamounas, E.P.; Kaufman, P.A.; Wolmark, N. Four-year follow-up of trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: Joint analysis of data from NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 3366–3373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  136. Bryant, J.L. HERCEPTIN Adjuvant Therapy. U.S. Patent Application No. US 2006/0275305 A1, 7 December 2006. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20060275305A1 (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  137. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine in Patients with HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Received Two or More Prior HER2 Directed Regimens in the Metastatic Setting (NALA) Phase III. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01808573 (accessed on 28 July 2025).
  138. Wang, H.; Yee, D. I-SPY 2: A neoadjuvant adaptive clinical trial designed to improve outcomes in high-risk breast cancer. Curr. Breast Cancer Rep. 2019, 11, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  139. ClinicalTrials.gov. I-SPY TRIAL: Neoadjuvant and Personalized Adaptive Novel Agents to Treat Breast Cancer (I-SPY); ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT01042379; National Library of Medicine: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2024.
  140. Sreedhara, A.; Lukas, C.A.; Mark, C.B.; Emma, L.C.; Christina, H.D.T.P.; Zephania, W.K.G.; Lada, M.; Jayantha, R.; Graham, A.R.; Ru-Amir, W. Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, Docetaxel and Carboplatin for the Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer. EP 2766040 B1, 11 October 2012. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/EP2766040B1 (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  141. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study to Evaluate Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel vs. Placebo + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel in Previously Untreated HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (CLEOPATRA). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00567190 (accessed on 28 July 2025).
  142. Naito, H.; Ogitani, Y.; Masuda, T.; Nakada, T.; Yoshida, M.; Ashida, S.; Morita, K.; Miyazaki, H.; Kasuya, Y.; Hayakawa, I.; et al. Anti—HER2 Antibody—Drug Conjugate. U.S. Patent No. 010155821, 18 December 2018. Available online: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/9b/db/e0/6f497cd0ee7f98/US10155821.pdf (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  143. Martínez-Sáez, O.; Prat, A. Current and future management of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. JCO Oncol. Pract. 2021, 17, 594–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  144. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Capecitabine + Lapatinib in Participants with HER2-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (EMILIA). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00829166 (accessed on 28 July 2025).
  145. Verma, S.; Miles, D.; Gianni, L.; Krop, I.E.; Welslau, M.; Baselga, J.; Pegram, M.; Oh, D.Y.; Diéras, V.; Guardino, E.; et al. Blackwell, K. Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 1783–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  146. Badovinac-Crnjevic, T.; Fredriksson, Y.C.; Heeson, S.; Nijem, I.H.; Kirschbrown, W.P.; Restuccia, E.U.S. Pertuzumab Plus Trastuzumab Fixed Dose Combination. Patent No. 12,252,549, 18 March 2025. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/US12252549B2/en (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  147. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study of Tucatinib vs. Placebo in Combination with Capecitabine & Trastuzumab in Patients with Advanced HER2+ Breast Cancer (HER2CLIMB). Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02614794 (accessed on 28 July 2025).
  148. Tolaney, S.M.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Barroso-Sousa, R.; Park, Y.H.; Rimawi, M.F.; Saura Manich, C.; Schneeweiss, A.; Toi, M.; Chae, Y.S.; et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) + pertuzumab (P) vs taxane + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (THP) for first-line (1L) treatment of patients (pts) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (HER2+) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (a/mBC): Interim results from DESTINY-Breast09. J. Clin. Oncol. 2025, 43, LBA1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  149. Xie, X. Combined Preparation for Reversing Drug Resistance of Breast Cancer and Application of Marker. China Patent No. CN 114 736 966 A, 12 July 2022. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=CN370180537 (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  150. Yuan, Y; Lou, K.; Qian, Y. Application of UGT1A7 in Medicine for Treating Herceptin-Resistant Breast Cancer. China Patent Application No. CN 115 029 435 A, 28 March 2025. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=CN375176274&_cid=P22-LTQ49B-16765-1#detailMainForm:MyTabViewId:NATIONALBIBLIO (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  151. Walker, L. Methods of Treating HER2-Positive Breast Cancer with Tucatinib in Combination with Capecitabine and Trastuzumab. International Patent No. WO 2021/080983, 29 April 2021. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2021080983&_cid=P22-LTQ4BJ-17652-1#detailMainForm:MyTabViewId:PCTBIBLIO (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  152. Wu, C.; Yuan, J.; Chang, Y.; Su, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wu, J. Application of Deubiquitinating Enzyme USP37 as Drug Target in Screening of Drugs for Treating Drug-Resistant Breast Cancer. China Patent Application No. CN 113 640 518 A, 12 November 2021. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=CN343417361&_cid=P22-LTQ4DA-18310-1#detailMainForm:MyTabViewId:NATIONALBIBLIO (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  153. Chen, Z.; Xu, J.; Wu, Y.; Fan, L. Trinuclear Platinum Coordination Compoundbased on Tri-Homoazine, Preparation Method and Application. CN113336798, 3 September 2021. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=CN336184951&_cid=P22-LTQ4EX-19092-1#detailMainForm:MyTabViewId:NATIONALBIBLIO (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  154. Application of UCH-L1 as Target Site in Preparation of HER2 Overexpression Breast Cancer Sensitization Treatment Drugs. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=CN318119386&_cid=P22-LTQ4IY-20615-1#detailMainForm:MyTabViewId:NATIONALBIBLIO (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  155. Cheng, X.; Canady, J. System and Method for Cold Plasma Therapy with HER-Family Receptors. U.S. Patent Application No. US 2020/0069958 A1, 5 March 2020. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=US289330559 (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  156. Anti-HER2 Antibody or Antigen-Binding Fragment Thereof, and Chimeric Antigen Receptor Comprising Same. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2019098682&_cid=P22-LTQ4HW-20220-1#detailMainForm:MyTabViewId:PCTBIBLIO (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  157. Medina-Kauwe, L.K.; Sims, J.; Taguaim, M.; Hanson, C.; Cui, X. Targeting Trastuzumab-Resistant HER2+Breast Cancer with a HER3-Targeting Nanoparticle. IL248046B, 30 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
  158. Method for Treating Anti-HER2 Therapy-Resistant MUC4+ HER2+ Cancer. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=US294690999&_cid=P22-LTQ4MA-21848-1#detailMainForm:MyTabViewId:NATIONALBIBLIO (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  159. Adams, J.; Carder, P.J.; Downey, S.; Forbes, M.A.; MacLennan, K.; Allgar, V.; Kaufman, S.; Hallam, S.; Bicknell, R.; Walker, J.J.; et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in breast cancer: Comparison of plasma, serum, and tissue VEGF and microvessel density and effects of tamoxifen. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 2898–2905. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10850435/ (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  160. Lithgow, D.; Nyamathi, A.; Elashoff, D.; Martinez-Maza, O.; Covington, C. C-reactive protein in nipple aspirate fluid: Relation to women’s health factors. Nurs. Res. 2006, 55, 418–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  161. Habanjar, O.; Bingula, R.; Decombat, C.; Diab-Assaf, M.; Caldefie-Chezet, F.; Delort, L. Crosstalk of Inflammatory Cytokines within the Breast Tumor Microenvironment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  162. Zhong, J.; Tang, Y. Research progress on the role of reactive oxygen species in the initiation, development and treatment of breast cancer. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2024, 188, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  163. Rajana, V.K.; Penumaka, S.M.; Saritha, C.; Ravichandiran, V.; Mandal, D. Yuflyma, A High Concentration and Citrate-free Adalimumab Biosimilar, Received FDA Approval for Treating Different Forms of Inflammato ry Diseases. Anti-Inflamm. Anti-Allergy Agents Med. Chem. 2023, 22, 273–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  164. Duro-Sánchez, S.; Alonso, M.R.; Arribas, J. Immunotherapies against HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Cancers 2023, 15, 1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  165. Zimmerman, B.S.; Esteva, F.J. Next-Generation HER2-Targeted Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer. Cancers 2024, 16, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  166. Kumbhar, P.R.; Kumar, P.; Lasure, A.; Velayutham, R.; Mandal, D. An updated landscape on nanotechnology-based drug delivery, immunotherapy, vaccinations, imaging, and biomarker detections for cancers: Recent trends and future directions with clinical success. Discov. Nano 2023, 18, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.