Next Article in Journal
Amphotericin B- and Levofloxacin-Loaded Chitosan Films for Potential Use in Antimicrobial Wound Dressings: Analytical Method Development and Its Application
Next Article in Special Issue
Progress on Thin Film Freezing Technology for Dry Powder Inhalation Formulations
Previous Article in Journal
Involvement of Transporters in Intestinal Drug–Drug Interactions of Oral Targeted Anticancer Drugs Assessed by Changes in Drug Absorption Time
Previous Article in Special Issue
Simultaneous Spray Drying for Combination Dry Powder Inhaler Formulations
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Advancements in the Design and Development of Dry Powder Inhalers and Potential Implications for Generic Development

Pharmaceutics 2022, 14(11), 2495; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112495
by Abhinav Ram Mohan †, Qiang Wang †, Sneha Dhapare, Elizabeth Bielski, Anubhav Kaviratna, Liangfeng Han, Susan Boc and Bryan Newman *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Pharmaceutics 2022, 14(11), 2495; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112495
Submission received: 4 October 2022 / Revised: 9 November 2022 / Accepted: 14 November 2022 / Published: 17 November 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors showed the different available DPI devices, I suggest collecting them in a table showing the advantages and disadvantages of each one. Also, there is no conclusion in this review.  Also, the authors didn't mention anything about the cost of each device. 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your feedback on our manuscript. Please find attached our response to your queries.

Thank You,

Abhinav Mohan

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

 

The manuscript by Mohan and coworkers summarizes the current understanding of the formulation and device in DPI performance, past and present research efforts to characterize these performance factors, and the implications that advances in formulation and device design may present for evaluating bioequivalence for generic development. The article is very well written and very interesting I just have few minor comments/suggestions:

-         Please when you are talking about the functions of a DPI device, line 112-117, please use bullet points.

-         The Figure 5a the resolution is quite bad, please change it.

-         In line 550 change “ – “ for “(“

-         Regarding the references, you can find the requirements in the section Instructions for Authors. Please, in the text the reference numbers should be placed in square brackets [ ], and placed before the punctuation; for example [1], [1–3] or [1,3]. The references should be described as follows:

 

·        For  Journal Articles:
1. Author 1, A.B.; Author 2, C.D. Title of the article. Abbreviated Journal Name Year, Volume, page range.

·        Websites:
Title of Site. Available online: URL (accessed on Day Month Year).

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your feedback on our manuscript. Please find attached our response to your queries.

Thank You,

Abhinav Mohan

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop