Production of Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Coastal Driftwood
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Driftwood
2.2. Determinations of Thermochemical Characteristics of Driftwood
2.3. Carbonization Experiments
2.4. Determinations of Pore and Chemical Characteristics of DW-Derived Biochar
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Thermochemical Characteristics of Coastal Driftwood
3.2. Yields and Pore Properties of DW-Derived Biochar Materials
- Regarding temperature, marked pore development occurred between 500 and 600 °C at all three residence times. For example, instrument-reported BET areas increased from approximately 1–6 m2/g at 500 °C to approximately 123–306 m2/g at 600 °C, depending on residence time. Further increases were observed at 700 and 800 °C. These data indicated that carbonization temperature exerted a stronger influence on accessible pore development than residence time within the investigated ranges. The trend was consistent with intensified devolatilization, secondary cracking, and progressive opening of previously inaccessible voids as thermal severity increased [26,27]. At the same time, increasing pore development was accompanied by declining crude yield, emphasizing the trade-off between carbon recovery and porosity.
- Residence time also influenced pore development, particularly at the higher carbonization temperatures, although its effect was generally secondary to that of temperature. At 800 °C, the instrument-reported BET area increased from 413 m2/g at 0 min to 590 m2/g at 30 min and 778 m2/g at 60 min. The associated total pore volume increased from 0.23 to 0.34 and 0.47 cm3/g, respectively. Continued devolatilization and secondary cracking during the isothermal period likely promoted additional opening and widening of pores. However, these improvements occurred together with additional mass loss; consequently, extending residence time cannot be evaluated solely on the basis of surface area.
- Figure 3 presents the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm for DW-800-60, which was selected for detailed presentation because it exhibited the highest pore development among the instrument-screened samples. The steep uptake at very low relative pressure is characteristic of substantial micropore filling, while the additional uptake and adsorption–desorption separation at intermediate-to-high relative pressure indicate that the material is not adequately described as a purely Type I microporous solid [28]. It is therefore interpreted more cautiously as a Type I-dominated micro/mesoporous carbon. The screening t-plot result assigned 516.0 m2/g of the 777.5 m2/g instrument-reported BET area to micropore area, and the total pore volume was 0.47 cm3/g. Importantly, application of the original fixed BET window to DW-800-60 produced a negative BET constant, demonstrating that a high linear correlation coefficient alone was insufficient to establish physical validity. Reanalysis using the Rouquerol criteria [20] over P/P0 = 0.0051–0.0597 yielded C ≈ 1.21 × 103, a monolayer relative pressure of approximately 0.028 within the selected range, R2 = 0.99998, and a BET estimate of approximately 944.0 m2/g. Thus, while the absolute BET value is method-dependent for this strongly microporous carbon, both analyses support the conclusion that DW-800-60 developed an unusually high N2-accessible surface area without deliberate chemical activation. Figure 4 shows an HK median pore width of approximately 0.568 nm; this value should be regarded as a model-dependent estimate because the HK calculations require idealized pore-geometry and adsorption-potential assumptions. The NLDFT or QSDFT using an appropriate carbon slit-pore model would provide a more rigorous pore-size distribution and is recommended for future analysis.
- The high surface area obtained by physical pyrolysis alone warranted additional consideration. Severe devolatilization at 800 °C, combined with the pre-existing vascular architecture of wood and progressive carbon-matrix contraction, can create and open a large micropore network. In addition, the as-received feedstock contained 3.91 wt% ash, suggesting that mineral matter was present. Alkali and alkaline-earth species can modify biomass pyrolysis pathways and char development [9], the study by De Smedt et al. [29] demonstrated that a ZnCl2-NaCl-KCl molten-salt mixture can strongly develop porosity during activated-carbon production. However, NaCl itself should not be assumed to have acted as an activating agent in the present study: recent work found that NaCl and KCl alone had comparatively small effects on pyrolysis products relative to carbonate salts [10]. Because Na, Cl, Ca, Mg, and related species were not quantified before and after washing, any contribution of inherent coastal salts to pore development remains a plausible but unverified mechanism rather than a demonstrated cause.
- Scanning electron microscopy was performed on DW-800-60 to examine the surface morphology and micrometer-scale structure (Figure 5). The images reveal elongated channels and cavities that are consistent with retention of the original wood vascular architecture after carbonization. These micrometer-scale features should not be interpreted as direct evidence of the microporosity responsible for the BET/t-plot results, because most micro- and small mesopores are below the resolution represented in the presented SEM fields. The brighter particles visible in the higher-magnification image may represent residual inorganic matter or other surface deposits, but localized EDS was not performed on these particles; consequently, they cannot be assigned specifically to NaCl or any other mineral phase.
3.3. Elemental Analysis of DW-Derived Biochar Materials
3.4. Practical Relevance and Study Limitations
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Murphy, E.; Nistor, I.; Cornett, A.; Wilson, J.; Pilechi, A. Fate and transport of coastal driftwood: A critical review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 170, 112649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Doong, D.J.; Chuang, H.C.; Shieh, C.L.; Hu, J.H. Quantity, distribution, and impacts of coastal driftwood triggered by a typhoon. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62, 1446–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Cotana, F.; Buratti, C.; Barbanera, M.; Cavalaglio, G.; Foschini, D.; Nicolini, A.; Pisello, A.L. Driftwood biomass in Italy: Estimation and characterization. Sustainability 2016, 8, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pisello, A.L.; Fabiani, C.; Makaremi, N.; Castaldo, V.L.; Cavalaglio, G.; Nicolini, A.; Barbanera, M.; Cotana, F. Sustainable new brick and thermo-acoustic insulation panel from mineralization of stranded driftwood residues. Energies 2016, 9, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rangel-Buitrago, N.; Ben-Haddad, M.; Galgani, F.; Neal, W.J.; Gracia, A. The blue carbon potential of coastal driftwood: Evidence from the Caribbean coast of Colombia. Catena 2025, 261, 109506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lavric, E.D.; Konnov, A.A.; Ruyck, J.D. Dioxin levels in wood combustion—A review. Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 26, 115–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Greggio, N.; Carlini, C.; Contin, A.; Soldano, M.; Marazza, D. Exploitable fish waste and stranded beach debris in the Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy). Waste Manag. 2018, 78, 566–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Abelha, P.; Vilela, C.M.; Nanou, P.; Carbo, M.; Janssen, A.; Leiser, S. Combustion improvements of upgraded biomass by washing and torrefaction. Fuel 2019, 253, 1018–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, W.; Lemaire, R.; Bensakhria, A.; Luart, D. Review on the catalytic effects of alkali and alkaline earth metals (AAEMs) including sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium on the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass and on the co-pyrolysis of coal with biomass. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2022, 163, 105479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, H.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, B.; Yang, Y.; Tang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H. Catalytic effect of K and Na with different anions on lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2024, 18, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Maisano, S.; Urbani, F.; Cipitì, F.; Freni, F.; Chiodo, V. Syngas production by BFB gasification: Experimental comparison of different biomasses. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 4414–4422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Puglia, M.; Morselli, N.; Ottani, F.; Pedrazzi, S.; Tartarini, P.; Allesina, G. A preliminary evaluation of different residual biomass potential for energy conversion in a micro-scale downdraft gasifier. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 57, 103224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vonk, G.; Boy, V.; Lanoisellé, J.-L.; Lendormi, T. The gasification of marine and coastal resources for syngas production: A review. Energies 2025, 18, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tröger, N.; Kröger, M.; Richter, D.; Förster, S.; Schröder, J.; Zech, K.; Liemen, F.; Stahl, R.; Müller-Langer, F. Utilization of biogenic residues and wastes in thermochemical systems for the production of fuels: Current status of the project. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 2013, 7, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Qatarneh, A.F.; Dupont, C.; Ruiz-Villanueva, V.; da Silva Perez, D.; Ashour, R.M.; Piégay, H.; Franca, M.J. Evaluating river driftwood as a feedstock for biochar production. Waste Manag. 2021, 134, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Qatarneh, A.F.; Dupont, C.; Michel, J.; Simonin, L.; Beda, A.; Ghimbeu, C.M.; Ruiz-Villanueva, V.; da Silva, D.; Piégay, H.; Franca, M.J. River driftwood pretreated via hydrothermal carbonization as a sustainable source of hard carbon for Na-ion battery anodes. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tsai, W.T.; Tsai, Y.L.; Liu, S.C. Utilization of driftwood as an energy source and its environmental and economic benefit analysis in Taiwan. BioResources 2011, 6, 4781–4789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tsai, C.H.; Morgan, H.M., Jr.; Tsai, W.T. Thermochemical characteristics of anaerobic dairy digestate and its pyrolysis conversion for producing porous carbon materials. Processes 2025, 13, 3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Morgan, H.M., Jr.; Yan, A.D.; Lu, Y.S.; Tsai, C.H.; Tsai, W.T. Pore and thermochemical properties of biochar materials produced from moso bamboo under different carbonization conditions. Materials 2026, 19, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Rouquerol, J.; Llewellyn, P.; Rouquerol, F. Is the BET equation applicable to microporous adsorbents? Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 2007, 160, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lowell, S.; Shields, J.E.; Thomas, M.A.; Thommes, M. Characterization of Porous Solids and Powders: Surface Area, Pore Size and Density; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Basu, P. Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Bartocci, P.; Barbanera, M.; D’Amico, M.; Laranci, P.; Cavalaglio, G.; Gelosia, M.; Ingles, D.; Bidini, G.; Buratti, C.; Cotana, F.; et al. Thermal degradation of driftwood: Determination of the concentration of sodium, calcium, magnesium, chlorine and sulfur containing compounds. Waste Manag. 2017, 60, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chen, D.; Cen, K.; Zhuang, X.; Gan, Z.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H. Insight into biomass pyrolysis mechanism based on cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin: Evolution of volatiles and kinetics, elucidation of reaction pathways, and characterization of gas, biochar and bio-oil. Combust. Flame 2022, 242, 112142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sun, J.; He, F.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, Z. Effects of pyrolysis temperature and residence time on physicochemical properties of different biochar types. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B—Soil Plant Sci. 2017, 67, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Keiluweit, M.; Nico, P.S.; Johnson, M.G.; Kleber, M. Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 1247–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chia, C.H.; Downie, A.; Munroe, P. Characteristics of biochar: Physical and structural properties. In Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation, 2nd ed.; Lehmann, J., Joseph, S., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 89–109. [Google Scholar]
- Condon, J.B. Surface Area and Porosity Determinations by Physisorption: Measurements and Theory; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- De Smedt, J.; Soroush, S.; Heynderickx, P.M.; Arauzo, P.J.; Ronsse, F. The feasibility of activated carbon derived from waste seaweed via molten salt activation in a eutectic mixture of ZnCl2-NaCl-KCl for adsorption of anionic dyes. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2025, 15, 12891–12903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mukome, F.N.D.; Parikh, S.J. Chemical, physical, and surface characterization of biochar. In Biochar: Production, Characterization, and Applications; Ok, Y.S., Uchimiya, S.M., Chang, S.X., Bolan, N., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; pp. 67–96. [Google Scholar]
- Bird, M.; Keitel, C.; Mereditch, W. Analysis of biochars for C, H, N, O and S by elemental analyser. In Biochar: A Guide to Analytical Methods; Singh, B., Camps-Arbestain, M., Lehmann, J., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 39–50. [Google Scholar]
- Han, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Pei, Y.; Zhao, C.; Li, J.; Dong, H.; Cheng, Z. Type-effects of multiple waste-sourced biochar feedstocks on methylene blue adsorption. New J. Chem. 2023, 47, 15057–15065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wu, Q.; Huang, C.; Li, S.; Li, M.; Chang, B. Preparation of porous carbon materials from waste wood chips and the adsorption performance for methylene blue. J. Funct. Mater. 2023, 54, 5141–5147. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Y.; Zhong, J.; Liu, B. Effective removal of methylene blue with zero-valent iron/tea residual biochar composite: Performance and mechanism. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 371, 128592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]





| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Proximate analysis a, b | |
| Ash (wt%) | 3.91 ± 0.70 |
| Volatile matter (wt%) | 78.40 ± 0.33 |
| Moisture (wt%) | 14.66 ± 0.41 |
| Fixed carbon c (wt.%) | 3.04 |
| Elemental analysis b, d | |
| Carbon (wt%) | 39.33 |
| Hydrogen (wt%) | 5.16 |
| Nitrogen (wt%) | 1.32 |
| Sulfur (wt%) | 0.29 |
| Oxygen c (wt%) | 53.90 |
| Calorific value (MJ/kg) b, d | 17.87 ± 0.38 |
| Biochar Products a | SBET b (m2/g) | Vt c (cm3/g) | Smic d (m2/g) | Vmic d (cm3/g) | Dave e (nm) | Yield f (wt%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DW-400-00 | 0.9 | 0.0024 | 0.1 | 0.0002 | 10.51 | 40.73 |
| DW-500-00 | 1.4 | 0.0034 | 0.2 | 0.0002 | 10.20 | 37.38 |
| DW-600-00 | 122.8 | 0.16 | 34.6 | 0.0444 | 5.21 | 33.98 |
| DW-700-00 | 282.4 | 0.16 | 240.6 | 0.1250 | 2.27 | 31.35 |
| DW-800-00 | 413.0 | 0.23 | 347.4 | 0.1760 | 2.24 | 27.21 |
| DW-400-30 | 1.6 | 0.0043 | 0.7 | 0.0004 | 10.83 | 40.58 |
| DW-500-30 | 2.3 | 0.0033 | 2.3 | 0.0012 | 5.87 | 36.68 |
| DW-600-30 | 240.9 | 0.14 | 200.9 | 0.10 | 2.28 | 32.96 |
| DW-700-30 | 427.9 | 0.24 | 344.9 | 0.17 | 2.26 | 28.70 |
| DW-800-30 | 590.2 | 0.34 | 463.7 | 0.24 | 2.31 | 27.30 |
| DW-400-60 | 0.2 | 0.0013 | n.r | n.r | n.r | 39.91 |
| DW-500-60 | 6.3 | 0.0017 | 3.5 | 0.0017 | 10.68 | 35.51 |
| DW-600-60 | 306.0 | 0.17 | 256.4 | 0.13 | 2.17 | 32.91 |
| DW-700-60 | 457.6 | 0.28 | 341.0 | 0.17 | 2.44 | 28.49 |
| DW-800-60 | 777.5 | 0.47 | 516.0 | 0.27 | 2.42 | 22.98 |
| Biochar Product | Carbon a (wt%) | Hydrogen a (wt%) | Nitrogen a (wt%) | Sulfur a (wt%) | Oxygen* a (wt%) | H/C (Atomic Ratio) | O/C* (Atomic Ratio) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DW-400-00 | 60.41 ± 6.02 | 3.44 ± 0.44 | 2.45 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.05 | 33.57 | 0.68 | 0.42 |
| DW-400-30 | 63.39 ± 7.76 | 3.52 ± 0.43 | 2.66 ± 0.11 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 30.27 | 0.66 | 0.36 |
| DW-400-60 | 64.19 ± 2.29 | 3.42 ± 0.15 | 2.52 ± 0.20 | 0.13 ± 0.00 | 29.74 | 0.63 | 0.35 |
| DW-500-00 | 69.57 ± 6.63 | 3.18 ± 0.35 | 2.58 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 24.48 | 0.55 | 0.26 |
| DW-500-30 | 74.32 ± 1.61 | 3.12 ± 0.05 | 2.79 ± 0.12 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 19.56 | 0.50 | 0.20 |
| DW-500-60 | 68.13 ± 6.97 | 2.76 ± 0.32 | 2.46 ± 0.08 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 26.49 | 0.48 | 0.29 |
| DW-600-00 | 76.88 ± 7.46 | 2.66 ± 0.24 | 2.61 ± 0.14 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 17.66 | 0.41 | 0.17 |
| DW-600-30 | 76.09 ± 1.17 | 2.19 ± 0.00 | 2.54 ± 0.31 | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 18.96 | 0.34 | 0.19 |
| DW-600-60 | 76.97 ± 4.13 | 2.02 ± 0.13 | 2.52 ± 0.35 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 18.27 | 0.31 | 0.18 |
| DW-700-00 | 74.15 ± 5.60 | 1.77 ± 0.13 | 2.41 ± 0.11 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 21.49 | 0.29 | 0.22 |
| DW-700-30 | 78.25 ± 6.41 | 1.56 ± 0.17 | 2.55 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.04 | 17.35 | 0.24 | 0.17 |
| DW-700-60 | 79.42 ± 6.75 | 1.62 ± 0.20 | 2.33 ± 0.07 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 16.33 | 0.24 | 0.15 |
| DW-800-00 | 79.89 ± 7.91 | 1.52 ± 0.08 | 2.42 ± 0.19 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 15.91 | 0.23 | 0.15 |
| DW-800-30 | 82.47 ± 7.88 | 1.43 ± 0.01 | 2.84 ± 0.00 | 0.41 ± 0.08 | 12.85 | 0.21 | 0.12 |
| DW-800-60 | 87.60 b | 1.51 ± 0.32 | 2.66 ± 0.11 | 0.53 ± 0.06 | 7.70 | 0.21 | 0.07 |
| Material/Feedstock | Preparation | SBET (m2/g) | Reported Pore Size | Demonstrated Application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DW-800-60 (this study) | Physical pyrolysis, 800 °C, 60 min;no deliberate chemical activation | 777.5 screening; ~944.0 Rouquerol | Dave 2.42 nm; HK median 0.568 nm (model-dependent) | Not tested; application validation required | This work |
| Auricularia auricula spent mushroom substrate | Direct carbonization, 500 °C (for 2 hr) | 341.1 | Mesopore development reported | Methylene blue, 28.1 mg/g | [32] |
| Waste wood-chip porous carbon | Direct carbonization with Fe(NO3)3 catalyst | up to 435.2 | 2.197-10.63 nm | Methylene blue, 321.7 mg/g | [33] |
| Fe0/tea-residue biochar composite | Pyrolysis + NaOH activation | 382.66 | Average 4.97 nm | Methylene blue, 452.5 mg/g | [34] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Morgan, H.M.; Tsai, C.-H.; Tsai, W.-T. Production of Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Coastal Driftwood. Materials 2026, 19, 3629. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19173629
Morgan HM, Tsai C-H, Tsai W-T. Production of Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Coastal Driftwood. Materials. 2026; 19(17):3629. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19173629
Chicago/Turabian StyleMorgan, Hervan Marion, Chi-Hung Tsai, and Wen-Tien Tsai. 2026. "Production of Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Coastal Driftwood" Materials 19, no. 17: 3629. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19173629
APA StyleMorgan, H. M., Tsai, C.-H., & Tsai, W.-T. (2026). Production of Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Coastal Driftwood. Materials, 19(17), 3629. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19173629

