Next Article in Journal
Effect of pH in the Hydrothermal Preparation of Bi2WO6 Nanostructures
Previous Article in Journal
Nanomelanin Potentially Protects the Spleen from Radiotherapy-Associated Damage and Enhances Immunoactivity in Tumor-Bearing Mice
Article

A Comparative Study on Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli–Armstrong, and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict Compression Flow Behavior of SnSbCu Alloy

1
College of Power and Energy Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
2
School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(10), 1726; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101726
Received: 26 March 2019 / Revised: 4 May 2019 / Accepted: 23 May 2019 / Published: 27 May 2019
The flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy is studied experimentally by the compression tests in the range of the strain rates from 0.0001 to 0.1 s−1 and temperature from 293 to 413 K. Based on the experimental data, three constitutive models including the Johnson–Cook (J–C), modified Zerilli–Armstrong (Z–A), and Arrhenius-type (A-type) models are compared to find out an optimum model to describe the flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy. The results show that the J–C model could predict the flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy accurately only at some specific strain rates and temperature near the reference values. The modified Z–A and A-type constitutive models can give better fitting results than the J–C model. While, at high strains, the predictive values of the modified Z–A model have larger errors than those at low strains, which means this model has limitations at high strains. By comparison, the A-type model could predict the experimental results accurately at the whole strain range, which indicates that it is a more suitable choice to describe the flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy in the focused range of strain rates and temperatures. The work is beneficial to solve the tribological problem of the bearing of the marine engine by integrating the accurate constitutive model into the corresponding numerical model. View Full-Text
Keywords: SnSbCu alloy; flow behavior; Johnson–Cook model; modified Zerilli–Armstrong model; Arrhenius-type model SnSbCu alloy; flow behavior; Johnson–Cook model; modified Zerilli–Armstrong model; Arrhenius-type model
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, T.; Zhao, B.; Lu, X.; Xu, H.; Zou, D. A Comparative Study on Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli–Armstrong, and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict Compression Flow Behavior of SnSbCu Alloy. Materials 2019, 12, 1726. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101726

AMA Style

Li T, Zhao B, Lu X, Xu H, Zou D. A Comparative Study on Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli–Armstrong, and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict Compression Flow Behavior of SnSbCu Alloy. Materials. 2019; 12(10):1726. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101726

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Tongyang, Bin Zhao, Xiqun Lu, Hanzhang Xu, and Dequan Zou. 2019. "A Comparative Study on Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli–Armstrong, and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict Compression Flow Behavior of SnSbCu Alloy" Materials 12, no. 10: 1726. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101726

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop