Purpose: Evaluate the effect of target speed and verbal instruction on near point of convergence (NPC) measurements in a young, healthy, and active population.
Methods: NPC was measured in 20 individuals with three target speeds and two sets of verbal instruction. The
[...] Read more.
Purpose: Evaluate the effect of target speed and verbal instruction on near point of convergence (NPC) measurements in a young, healthy, and active population.
Methods: NPC was measured in 20 individuals with three target speeds and two sets of verbal instruction. The target speeds used were 1 cm/s, 3 cm/s, 5 cm/s, and participant self-paced. The verbal instruction given was either to indicate when the target became “double” or “blurry”.
Results: Paired-samples
t-tests revealed significant differences between 5 cm/s (5.44 ± 2.01) and 1 cm/s (6.72 ± 2.39,
p = 0.003), 3 cm/s (6.10 ± 2.36,
p = 0.030) and self-paced (6.63 ± 2.26,
p = 0.005). A significant difference (
p < 0.001) was also found between the “double” (6.72 ± 2.39) and “blurry” (10.82 ± 3.08) conditions.
Conclusions: For young, healthy and active individuals, target speed and verbal instruction matter when measuring NPC.
Full article