<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
 xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
 xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    <channel rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/rss/journal/jemr">
		<title>Journal of Eye Movement Research</title>
		<description>Latest open access articles published in J. Eye Mov. Res. at https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jemr</description>
		<link>https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jemr</link>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jemr"/>
		<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:support@mdpi.com"/>
		<dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY)</dc:rights>
						<prism:copyright>MDPI</prism:copyright>
		<prism:rightsAgent>support@mdpi.com</prism:rightsAgent>
		<image rdf:resource="https://pub.mdpi-res.com/img/design/mdpi-pub-logo.png?13cf3b5bd783e021?1790749313"/>
				<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/109" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/108" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/107" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/106" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/105" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/104" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/103" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/102" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/101" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/100" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/99" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/98" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/97" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/96" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/95" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/94" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/93" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/92" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/91" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/90" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/89" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/88" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/87" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/86" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/85" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/84" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/83" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/82" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/81" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/80" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/79" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/78" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/77" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/76" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/75" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/74" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/73" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/72" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/71" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/70" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/69" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/68" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/67" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/66" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/65" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/64" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/63" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/62" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/61" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/60" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/59" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/58" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/57" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/56" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/55" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/54" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/53" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/52" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/51" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/50" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/49" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/48" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/47" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/46" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/45" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/44" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/43" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/42" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/41" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/40" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/39" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/38" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/37" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/36" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/35" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/34" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/33" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/32" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/31" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/30" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/29" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/28" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/27" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/26" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/25" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/24" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/23" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/22" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/21" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/20" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/19" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/18" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/17" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/16" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/15" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/14" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/13" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/12" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/11" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/10" />
                    	</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
				<cc:license rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" />
	</channel>

        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/109">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 109: From Gaze Allocation to Scan Sequences: A Segment-Sensitive Eye-Tracking Study of Pilot Scan Discipline During Simulated Instrument Landing System Approaches</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/109</link>
	<description>Instrument Landing System (ILS) approaches impose distinct visual demands across two operational segments, including (i) an intermediate approach segment prior to the final approach fix (FAF), during which pilots intercept and track the localizer while complying with published altitude restrictions and the glideslope-intercept altitude, and (ii) the final approach (FA) segment from the FAF to decision altitude/decision height, during which pilots precisely maintain both localizer and glideslope guidance. Using eye tracking, this study examines segment-specific scan behavior during simulated ILS approaches in low visibility conditions performed by 36 licensed pilots in a Cessna 172 equipped with G1000 avionics. The study results show that successful approaches were characterized by suppressed external viewing, more compact scans, and more organized return-loop patterns, suggesting that effective ILS scan discipline depends not only on looking at task-relevant instruments, but also on organizing those scans into phase-appropriate and functionally integrated sequences. By linking gaze allocation, scan dispersion, and scan sequence patterns to approach outcomes, this study demonstrates how eye tracking can provide segment-sensitive markers of instrument-scan quality. We further propose candidate scan-assessment metrics that may contribute to more precise and objective simulator debriefing, as well as future flightdeck-interface concepts that may support disciplined cross-checking without increasing pilot workload.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-09-23</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 109: From Gaze Allocation to Scan Sequences: A Segment-Sensitive Eye-Tracking Study of Pilot Scan Discipline During Simulated Instrument Landing System Approaches</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/109">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050109</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Bo Fu
		Jonathan Peña
		Oscar Arenas
		Russell Harral
		</p>
	<p>Instrument Landing System (ILS) approaches impose distinct visual demands across two operational segments, including (i) an intermediate approach segment prior to the final approach fix (FAF), during which pilots intercept and track the localizer while complying with published altitude restrictions and the glideslope-intercept altitude, and (ii) the final approach (FA) segment from the FAF to decision altitude/decision height, during which pilots precisely maintain both localizer and glideslope guidance. Using eye tracking, this study examines segment-specific scan behavior during simulated ILS approaches in low visibility conditions performed by 36 licensed pilots in a Cessna 172 equipped with G1000 avionics. The study results show that successful approaches were characterized by suppressed external viewing, more compact scans, and more organized return-loop patterns, suggesting that effective ILS scan discipline depends not only on looking at task-relevant instruments, but also on organizing those scans into phase-appropriate and functionally integrated sequences. By linking gaze allocation, scan dispersion, and scan sequence patterns to approach outcomes, this study demonstrates how eye tracking can provide segment-sensitive markers of instrument-scan quality. We further propose candidate scan-assessment metrics that may contribute to more precise and objective simulator debriefing, as well as future flightdeck-interface concepts that may support disciplined cross-checking without increasing pilot workload.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>From Gaze Allocation to Scan Sequences: A Segment-Sensitive Eye-Tracking Study of Pilot Scan Discipline During Simulated Instrument Landing System Approaches</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Bo Fu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jonathan Peña</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Oscar Arenas</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Russell Harral</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050109</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-09-23</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-23</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>109</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050109</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/109</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/108">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 108: Spatio-Temporal Segmentation of Eye Movements During Complex Decision Making Using Switching Hidden Markov Models</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/108</link>
	<description>Understanding how visual exploration evolves over time during complex decision making remains challenging, as the dynamics of underlying cognitive processes are difficult to observe. Hidden Markov models are widely used to model eye movement sequences, but their assumption of stationary transition probabilities limits their ability to identify successive phases. This study investigated whether Switching Hidden Markov Models (SHMMs), trained only on fixation positions, could segment visual exploration during an obstacle-avoidance task requiring a left/right decision. Individual SHMMs with two or three high-level (HI) states were trained without using reaction times. HI states were characterized through transition-matrix variability, saliency maps, cumulative dwell times in regions of interest, and their association with reaction times. Both models produced temporal segmentations consistent with decision making. Early HI states showed greater interindividual variability and exploration focused on obstacles, whereas later states were more homogeneous and reflected decision confirmation followed by reorientation toward the center of the screen. The transition to the final HI state of the three-state model best explained reaction time. Furthermore, the average log-likelihood of the Viterbi state restoration improved the fit quality of this explanatory model, indicating that SHMM confidence provided complementary behavioral information. These findings suggest that SHMMs trained only on fixation positions can identify phases broadly consistent with those traditionally observed in the decision-making process, such as early evidence accumulation and late decision confirmation.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-09-22</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 108: Spatio-Temporal Segmentation of Eye Movements During Complex Decision Making Using Switching Hidden Markov Models</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/108">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050108</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Anne Guérin-Dugué
		Mike Salomone
		Aurélie Campagne
		</p>
	<p>Understanding how visual exploration evolves over time during complex decision making remains challenging, as the dynamics of underlying cognitive processes are difficult to observe. Hidden Markov models are widely used to model eye movement sequences, but their assumption of stationary transition probabilities limits their ability to identify successive phases. This study investigated whether Switching Hidden Markov Models (SHMMs), trained only on fixation positions, could segment visual exploration during an obstacle-avoidance task requiring a left/right decision. Individual SHMMs with two or three high-level (HI) states were trained without using reaction times. HI states were characterized through transition-matrix variability, saliency maps, cumulative dwell times in regions of interest, and their association with reaction times. Both models produced temporal segmentations consistent with decision making. Early HI states showed greater interindividual variability and exploration focused on obstacles, whereas later states were more homogeneous and reflected decision confirmation followed by reorientation toward the center of the screen. The transition to the final HI state of the three-state model best explained reaction time. Furthermore, the average log-likelihood of the Viterbi state restoration improved the fit quality of this explanatory model, indicating that SHMM confidence provided complementary behavioral information. These findings suggest that SHMMs trained only on fixation positions can identify phases broadly consistent with those traditionally observed in the decision-making process, such as early evidence accumulation and late decision confirmation.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Spatio-Temporal Segmentation of Eye Movements During Complex Decision Making Using Switching Hidden Markov Models</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Anne Guérin-Dugué</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mike Salomone</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Aurélie Campagne</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050108</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-09-22</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-22</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>108</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050108</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/108</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/107">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 107: Visual Attention and Aesthetic Evaluation of Two-Color TV-Cabinet Decorative Finishes in Older Adults</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/107</link>
	<description>For age-friendly furniture surface design, the color of a TV-cabinet finish affects not only visual comfort in the living room but also older users’ aesthetic preferences, perceived harmony, and emotional acceptance of furniture products. To clarify how older adults perceive hue, value, and the dominant–secondary area relationship in two-color decorative finishes for TV cabinets, this study used a digital model with a unified form and constructed surface color schemes varying in hue, value, and two-color dominance. The experiment contained two parts. Experiment 1 examined the differences in subjective evaluation and visual attention under colored hue × value conditions. Experiment 2 examined the changes in preference and attention under dominant/secondary color relationship × colored hue × value conditions. Thirty-five older participants completed an eye-tracking experiment and a seven-point semantic-differential questionnaire. The results showed that: (1) a three-item aesthetic scale comprising pleasure, simplicity, and order showed good internal consistency in both experiments; (2) hue had a significant effect on subjective pleasantness, while significant interactions indicated that preference also depended on specific combinations of hue, value, and color relationship—yellow showed relatively high descriptive pleasantness ratings under the tested conditions; and (3) the viewing duration varied with the experimental color factors, whereas no statistically significant associations were detected between subjective pleasantness and either the viewing duration or the fixation count under the tested conditions, suggesting that visual-attention measures and subjective preferences provide complementary rather than equivalent information. These findings provide preliminary empirical evidence from subjective evaluation and eye-movement data for further exploration of color configurations in age-friendly furniture decorative finishes and coating surfaces.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-09-22</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 107: Visual Attention and Aesthetic Evaluation of Two-Color TV-Cabinet Decorative Finishes in Older Adults</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/107">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050107</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Dong Jin
		Mengxian Wu
		Ruishi Wang
		Yiping Li
		Xiaoxing Yan
		</p>
	<p>For age-friendly furniture surface design, the color of a TV-cabinet finish affects not only visual comfort in the living room but also older users’ aesthetic preferences, perceived harmony, and emotional acceptance of furniture products. To clarify how older adults perceive hue, value, and the dominant–secondary area relationship in two-color decorative finishes for TV cabinets, this study used a digital model with a unified form and constructed surface color schemes varying in hue, value, and two-color dominance. The experiment contained two parts. Experiment 1 examined the differences in subjective evaluation and visual attention under colored hue × value conditions. Experiment 2 examined the changes in preference and attention under dominant/secondary color relationship × colored hue × value conditions. Thirty-five older participants completed an eye-tracking experiment and a seven-point semantic-differential questionnaire. The results showed that: (1) a three-item aesthetic scale comprising pleasure, simplicity, and order showed good internal consistency in both experiments; (2) hue had a significant effect on subjective pleasantness, while significant interactions indicated that preference also depended on specific combinations of hue, value, and color relationship—yellow showed relatively high descriptive pleasantness ratings under the tested conditions; and (3) the viewing duration varied with the experimental color factors, whereas no statistically significant associations were detected between subjective pleasantness and either the viewing duration or the fixation count under the tested conditions, suggesting that visual-attention measures and subjective preferences provide complementary rather than equivalent information. These findings provide preliminary empirical evidence from subjective evaluation and eye-movement data for further exploration of color configurations in age-friendly furniture decorative finishes and coating surfaces.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Visual Attention and Aesthetic Evaluation of Two-Color TV-Cabinet Decorative Finishes in Older Adults</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Dong Jin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mengxian Wu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ruishi Wang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yiping Li</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xiaoxing Yan</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050107</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-09-22</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-22</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>107</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050107</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/107</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/106">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 106: Stage-Specific Effects of Spatial Organization on Visual Search Under Clutter: Behavioral and Eye-Movement Evidence</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/106</link>
	<description>Whether a well-organized scene facilitates visual search may depend on when in the search process the benefit is expressed. We tested this possibility in a virtual-office task in which 48 adults searched for targets varying in salience. Salience was manipulated between participants, whereas layout (grid, clustered, or random) and clutter (low, medium, or high) varied within participants. Mouse responses and eye position (120 Hz) were collected across 1296 target-present trials. Accuracy was broadly comparable across conditions, but reaction time (RT), time to first fixation (TTFF), fixation duration in the Target AOI, and fixation duration in the Clutter AOI each showed a three-way interaction. The transition data were particularly informative under high clutter. For grid layouts, clutter-to-target transitions occurred on 47.3% of transitions, clutter-to-clutter self-transitions on 20.5%, and the target was first reached after 0.89 intervening transitions on average. The respective values for random layouts were 11.2%, 64.2%, and 6.39. Thus, the benefit of the grid was not consistently present at initial target capture. It became most evident in the way gaze was redirected among regions as the search unfolded. Spatial regularity therefore seems to limit later search costs by making attentional reallocation and gaze-path correction more efficient.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-09-21</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 106: Stage-Specific Effects of Spatial Organization on Visual Search Under Clutter: Behavioral and Eye-Movement Evidence</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/106">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050106</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Xinxin Wang
		Jiaji Gao
		</p>
	<p>Whether a well-organized scene facilitates visual search may depend on when in the search process the benefit is expressed. We tested this possibility in a virtual-office task in which 48 adults searched for targets varying in salience. Salience was manipulated between participants, whereas layout (grid, clustered, or random) and clutter (low, medium, or high) varied within participants. Mouse responses and eye position (120 Hz) were collected across 1296 target-present trials. Accuracy was broadly comparable across conditions, but reaction time (RT), time to first fixation (TTFF), fixation duration in the Target AOI, and fixation duration in the Clutter AOI each showed a three-way interaction. The transition data were particularly informative under high clutter. For grid layouts, clutter-to-target transitions occurred on 47.3% of transitions, clutter-to-clutter self-transitions on 20.5%, and the target was first reached after 0.89 intervening transitions on average. The respective values for random layouts were 11.2%, 64.2%, and 6.39. Thus, the benefit of the grid was not consistently present at initial target capture. It became most evident in the way gaze was redirected among regions as the search unfolded. Spatial regularity therefore seems to limit later search costs by making attentional reallocation and gaze-path correction more efficient.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Stage-Specific Effects of Spatial Organization on Visual Search Under Clutter: Behavioral and Eye-Movement Evidence</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Xinxin Wang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jiaji Gao</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050106</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-09-21</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-21</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>106</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050106</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/106</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/105">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 105: Visual Harmony and Complexity Shape Subjective Judgments More than Detectable Overt Attention: Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Facial Coding</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/105</link>
	<description>Understanding how visual structure shapes attentional allocation is central to models of perceptual processing. Less is known about how formal properties like harmony and complexity shape exploration independent of salience or semantic content. This study examined how controlled structural variations relate to attention, facial engagement, and subjective judgment using eye-tracking and webcam-based facial coding. Participants (N=40) viewed stimuli derived from a common geometric base, manipulated into three conditions: high harmony (symmetrical, low complexity), high complexity (asymmetrical, disorganized), and structured complexity (high complexity with underlying order). Eye movements and facial expressions were recorded during free viewing. Metrics included time to first fixation, fixation duration, number of fixations, scanpath entropy, spatial dispersion, and facial-coding indices (neutral, happy, and surprise expression, and the ambient/focal coefficient K). None of the eye-tracking or facial-coding metrics differed significantly across conditions; given that the study was powered to detect only medium-to-large effects, this indicates no detectable difference under the present webcam-based, brief-exposure design rather than evidence that visual structure has no effect on attention. Subjective complexity ratings differed robustly across conditions, surviving correction for multiple comparisons: unexpectedly, the high-complexity condition was rated as less complex than the harmony and structured-complexity conditions, indicating the intended manipulation did not translate into perceived complexity as designed. A nominally significant difference in pleasantness ratings did not survive this correction. Using repeated-measures correlation to account for the non-independence of within-participant observations, scanpath entropy showed a nominal negative association with pleasantness that did not survive correction for multiple comparisons, and the coefficient K showed a weaker and partly inconsistent pattern of association with independent oculomotor indices than initial uncorrected analyses suggested. These findings indicate that, in the present study, formal visual structure shaped subjective complexity judgments more robustly than it shaped overt attentional or facial-affective engagement, a pattern consistent with&amp;amp;mdash;though not conclusive proof of&amp;amp;mdash;a broader dissociation between evaluative and attentional responses reported in face perception and developmental aesthetics research. Beyond this substantive finding, we report in detail how accounting for repeated-measures non-independence and applying an explicit multiplicity strategy changed our statistical conclusions, offering a worked methodological example for similarly structured webcam-based eye-tracking and facial-coding studies.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-09-18</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 105: Visual Harmony and Complexity Shape Subjective Judgments More than Detectable Overt Attention: Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Facial Coding</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/105">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050105</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Horacio Rostro-Gonzalez
		Ana M. S. Gonzalez-Acosta
		Victor H. Jimenez-Arredondo
		</p>
	<p>Understanding how visual structure shapes attentional allocation is central to models of perceptual processing. Less is known about how formal properties like harmony and complexity shape exploration independent of salience or semantic content. This study examined how controlled structural variations relate to attention, facial engagement, and subjective judgment using eye-tracking and webcam-based facial coding. Participants (N=40) viewed stimuli derived from a common geometric base, manipulated into three conditions: high harmony (symmetrical, low complexity), high complexity (asymmetrical, disorganized), and structured complexity (high complexity with underlying order). Eye movements and facial expressions were recorded during free viewing. Metrics included time to first fixation, fixation duration, number of fixations, scanpath entropy, spatial dispersion, and facial-coding indices (neutral, happy, and surprise expression, and the ambient/focal coefficient K). None of the eye-tracking or facial-coding metrics differed significantly across conditions; given that the study was powered to detect only medium-to-large effects, this indicates no detectable difference under the present webcam-based, brief-exposure design rather than evidence that visual structure has no effect on attention. Subjective complexity ratings differed robustly across conditions, surviving correction for multiple comparisons: unexpectedly, the high-complexity condition was rated as less complex than the harmony and structured-complexity conditions, indicating the intended manipulation did not translate into perceived complexity as designed. A nominally significant difference in pleasantness ratings did not survive this correction. Using repeated-measures correlation to account for the non-independence of within-participant observations, scanpath entropy showed a nominal negative association with pleasantness that did not survive correction for multiple comparisons, and the coefficient K showed a weaker and partly inconsistent pattern of association with independent oculomotor indices than initial uncorrected analyses suggested. These findings indicate that, in the present study, formal visual structure shaped subjective complexity judgments more robustly than it shaped overt attentional or facial-affective engagement, a pattern consistent with&amp;amp;mdash;though not conclusive proof of&amp;amp;mdash;a broader dissociation between evaluative and attentional responses reported in face perception and developmental aesthetics research. Beyond this substantive finding, we report in detail how accounting for repeated-measures non-independence and applying an explicit multiplicity strategy changed our statistical conclusions, offering a worked methodological example for similarly structured webcam-based eye-tracking and facial-coding studies.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Visual Harmony and Complexity Shape Subjective Judgments More than Detectable Overt Attention: Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Facial Coding</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Horacio Rostro-Gonzalez</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ana M. S. Gonzalez-Acosta</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Victor H. Jimenez-Arredondo</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050105</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-09-18</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-18</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>105</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050105</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/105</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/104">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 104: How Does Peripheral Vision Feel Rich? A Selective Review</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/104</link>
	<description>Human vision is profoundly non-uniform. Spatial resolution, contrast sensitivity, colour discrimination decrease, and the appearance of visual features become increasingly distorted with retinal eccentricity, yet visual experience appears remarkably rich and stable across the entire visual field. This apparent paradox has been a central challenge in vision science: how can a perceptually rich world emerge from a sensory system that samples only a small fraction of the environment with high precision? We argue that cognitive biases alone may be insufficient to explain the apparent richness of peripheral vision and review evidence suggesting that perceptual processes may also contribute. Information sampled in central vision can be extrapolated to peripheral appearance, while prior knowledge and learned regularities allow the visual system to infer missing or distorted peripheral information. These processes operate within the constraints of active vision, where eye movements selectively sample task-relevant information rather than building a complete detailed representation of the scene. We propose that the interaction between centre-to-periphery extrapolation and learned predictions may contribute to rich peripheral experience, specially where we direct attention, allowing the visual system to maintain a coherent and useful representation of the world.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-09-18</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 104: How Does Peripheral Vision Feel Rich? A Selective Review</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/104">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050104</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Amelia Beatson
		Anna Metzger
		Matteo Toscani
		</p>
	<p>Human vision is profoundly non-uniform. Spatial resolution, contrast sensitivity, colour discrimination decrease, and the appearance of visual features become increasingly distorted with retinal eccentricity, yet visual experience appears remarkably rich and stable across the entire visual field. This apparent paradox has been a central challenge in vision science: how can a perceptually rich world emerge from a sensory system that samples only a small fraction of the environment with high precision? We argue that cognitive biases alone may be insufficient to explain the apparent richness of peripheral vision and review evidence suggesting that perceptual processes may also contribute. Information sampled in central vision can be extrapolated to peripheral appearance, while prior knowledge and learned regularities allow the visual system to infer missing or distorted peripheral information. These processes operate within the constraints of active vision, where eye movements selectively sample task-relevant information rather than building a complete detailed representation of the scene. We propose that the interaction between centre-to-periphery extrapolation and learned predictions may contribute to rich peripheral experience, specially where we direct attention, allowing the visual system to maintain a coherent and useful representation of the world.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>How Does Peripheral Vision Feel Rich? A Selective Review</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Amelia Beatson</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anna Metzger</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Matteo Toscani</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050104</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-09-18</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-18</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>104</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050104</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/104</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/103">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 103: Eye-Tracking Research: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on Scopus</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/103</link>
	<description>Eye tracking is an interdisciplinary research method used in many fields, including engineering, architecture, health sciences, psychology, marketing, and human–computer interaction. Although it is often perceived as a modern research method, its origins can be traced back to the nineteenth century. This study aims to identify the developmental trends and thematic structure of eye-tracking research from its early history to the present. Bibliometric analysis was used to evaluate studies in the field of eye-tracking. A total of 45,230 publications identified in the Scopus database using eye-tracking search terms were analyzed. The most productive authors, institutions, countries, publication sources, keywords, and thematic trends were examined using Bibliometrix in the RStudio environment. The findings show substantial growth in eye-tracking research during 2020–2025, with 22,130 publications recorded during this period. The analysis also shows that the share of eye-tracking publications in total Scopus output increased from 0.0134% in 2000 to 0.0963% in 2025, while the search sensitivity analysis demonstrates that terminology choices substantially affect the size and composition of the retrieved corpus. Computer Science accounted for the largest share of publications. The United States had the highest number of publications. Based on Scopus affiliation records, the University of California system had the highest publication count among the institutional structures identified in the dataset, although this figure may reflect the combined representation of different campuses and affiliated units and should therefore not be interpreted as a direct comparison of individual campuses. In addition to fundamental concepts such as eye movements and visual attention, themes such as EEG, virtual reality, augmented reality, computer vision, machine learning, and deep learning have become more prominent in recent years. Overall, the findings reveal academic orientations and temporal trends in eye-tracking research. They also provide a framework for potential future research directions.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-09-16</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 103: Eye-Tracking Research: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on Scopus</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/103">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050103</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Mehmet Özalp
		Hicran Halaç
		Nuray Özkaraca Özalp
		Fikret Bademci
		</p>
	<p>Eye tracking is an interdisciplinary research method used in many fields, including engineering, architecture, health sciences, psychology, marketing, and human–computer interaction. Although it is often perceived as a modern research method, its origins can be traced back to the nineteenth century. This study aims to identify the developmental trends and thematic structure of eye-tracking research from its early history to the present. Bibliometric analysis was used to evaluate studies in the field of eye-tracking. A total of 45,230 publications identified in the Scopus database using eye-tracking search terms were analyzed. The most productive authors, institutions, countries, publication sources, keywords, and thematic trends were examined using Bibliometrix in the RStudio environment. The findings show substantial growth in eye-tracking research during 2020–2025, with 22,130 publications recorded during this period. The analysis also shows that the share of eye-tracking publications in total Scopus output increased from 0.0134% in 2000 to 0.0963% in 2025, while the search sensitivity analysis demonstrates that terminology choices substantially affect the size and composition of the retrieved corpus. Computer Science accounted for the largest share of publications. The United States had the highest number of publications. Based on Scopus affiliation records, the University of California system had the highest publication count among the institutional structures identified in the dataset, although this figure may reflect the combined representation of different campuses and affiliated units and should therefore not be interpreted as a direct comparison of individual campuses. In addition to fundamental concepts such as eye movements and visual attention, themes such as EEG, virtual reality, augmented reality, computer vision, machine learning, and deep learning have become more prominent in recent years. Overall, the findings reveal academic orientations and temporal trends in eye-tracking research. They also provide a framework for potential future research directions.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Eye-Tracking Research: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on Scopus</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Mehmet Özalp</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hicran Halaç</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nuray Özkaraca Özalp</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Fikret Bademci</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050103</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-09-16</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-16</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>103</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050103</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/103</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/102">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 102: Looking Back While Reading Ahead: Regressive Fixations and Temporal Anticipation in Music Sight-Reading</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/102</link>
	<description>This study examined how regressive fixations relate to temporal anticipation and unfolding temporal dynamics during music sight-reading. Eye-movement, performance, and respiratory data were recorded from 28 flutists performing three scores differing in musical and metrical structure; performance recordings were MIDI-aligned with eye-movement and respiratory measures. Regressive fixations were defined as fixations following regressions toward previously viewed score notes. A participant-grouped random forest model explained 60% of the out-of-fold variance in regressive-fixation count, highlighting fixation count, mean fixation duration, and time-based eye–hand span as leading predictors. Mixed-effects analyses showed that time-based eye–hand span was the most consistent predictor, while performance duration and mean fixation duration provided additional information. Rhythmic accuracy moderated the relationship between temporal anticipation and regressive-fixation count, with a stronger positive association in more accurate performances (β = 1.062, 95% CI [0.282, 1.842], p = 0.008). This interaction remained significant when regressive-fixation count was modeled relative to performance duration and after controlling for mean fixation duration. An additional analysis found no evidence that shorter fixation durations attenuated the association between more regressions and longer relative performance duration. These findings suggest that regressive fixations are associated with temporal anticipation during music sight-reading and may inform cross-domain research on the role of regressive eye movements in reading comprehension.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-09-15</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 102: Looking Back While Reading Ahead: Regressive Fixations and Temporal Anticipation in Music Sight-Reading</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/102">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050102</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Michel Cara
		Divna Mitrovic
		</p>
	<p>This study examined how regressive fixations relate to temporal anticipation and unfolding temporal dynamics during music sight-reading. Eye-movement, performance, and respiratory data were recorded from 28 flutists performing three scores differing in musical and metrical structure; performance recordings were MIDI-aligned with eye-movement and respiratory measures. Regressive fixations were defined as fixations following regressions toward previously viewed score notes. A participant-grouped random forest model explained 60% of the out-of-fold variance in regressive-fixation count, highlighting fixation count, mean fixation duration, and time-based eye–hand span as leading predictors. Mixed-effects analyses showed that time-based eye–hand span was the most consistent predictor, while performance duration and mean fixation duration provided additional information. Rhythmic accuracy moderated the relationship between temporal anticipation and regressive-fixation count, with a stronger positive association in more accurate performances (β = 1.062, 95% CI [0.282, 1.842], p = 0.008). This interaction remained significant when regressive-fixation count was modeled relative to performance duration and after controlling for mean fixation duration. An additional analysis found no evidence that shorter fixation durations attenuated the association between more regressions and longer relative performance duration. These findings suggest that regressive fixations are associated with temporal anticipation during music sight-reading and may inform cross-domain research on the role of regressive eye movements in reading comprehension.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Looking Back While Reading Ahead: Regressive Fixations and Temporal Anticipation in Music Sight-Reading</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Michel Cara</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Divna Mitrovic</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050102</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-09-15</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-15</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>102</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050102</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/102</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/101">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 101: Effects of Playback Speed on Eye Movement Behavior During News Viewing: An Eye-Tracking Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/101</link>
	<description>The increasing use of accelerated playback in digital media consumption has raised questions regarding its effects on viewers’ perception. This study examined whether playback speed in TV news videos (1× vs. 2×) affects viewers’ subjective responses, memory performance, and eye-tracking behavior. We presented news videos under either normal or accelerated playback conditions to a total of N = 146 participants. Our results showed that accelerated playback was associated with lower valence, reduced perceived comprehension, lower credibility evaluations, poorer memory performance, and lower recommendation-intention ratings. In contrast, arousal ratings were higher under accelerated playback conditions. Eye-tracking measures revealed differences in visual attention patterns between conditions, including fixation behavior and attention allocated to lower-third captions. However, the fixation-rate difference should be interpreted cautiously, as increased stimulus velocity may have influenced fixation classification. These findings suggest that accelerated playback was associated with differences in audience evaluation and viewing behavior during news consumption.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-09-10</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 101: Effects of Playback Speed on Eye Movement Behavior During News Viewing: An Eye-Tracking Study</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/101">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050101</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Melissa Gurdián-Franceschi
		Miguel Martín-Pascual
		Celia Andreu-Sánchez
		</p>
	<p>The increasing use of accelerated playback in digital media consumption has raised questions regarding its effects on viewers’ perception. This study examined whether playback speed in TV news videos (1× vs. 2×) affects viewers’ subjective responses, memory performance, and eye-tracking behavior. We presented news videos under either normal or accelerated playback conditions to a total of N = 146 participants. Our results showed that accelerated playback was associated with lower valence, reduced perceived comprehension, lower credibility evaluations, poorer memory performance, and lower recommendation-intention ratings. In contrast, arousal ratings were higher under accelerated playback conditions. Eye-tracking measures revealed differences in visual attention patterns between conditions, including fixation behavior and attention allocated to lower-third captions. However, the fixation-rate difference should be interpreted cautiously, as increased stimulus velocity may have influenced fixation classification. These findings suggest that accelerated playback was associated with differences in audience evaluation and viewing behavior during news consumption.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Effects of Playback Speed on Eye Movement Behavior During News Viewing: An Eye-Tracking Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Melissa Gurdián-Franceschi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Miguel Martín-Pascual</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Celia Andreu-Sánchez</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050101</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-09-10</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-10</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>101</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050101</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/101</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/100">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 100: Abnormal Fixational Eye Movements in Ophthalmic Disease: Implications for Visual Function and Clinical Assessment</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/100</link>
	<description>Ophthalmic disorders cause pathological abnormalities in fixational movements. Across disorders, recent studies demonstrate that fixation can be disrupted, often with reported changes in stability and other oculomotor dynamics as the conditions progress. Some of these changes are functionally linked to reduced visual acuity, degraded reading performance, and impaired binocular function. In this narrative review, we synthesize recent work on fixational eye movements and fixation instability in ophthalmic disease. We argue that fixational measures may provide research biomarkers and clinical correlates of disease progression. These metrics could eventually contribute to treatment monitoring applications. The development of accessible and non-invasive eye-tracking tools could enhance clinical interventions. Continued progress will depend on establishing robust normative datasets and determining which oculomotor metrics provide reliable clinical information across disease states.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-09-09</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 100: Abnormal Fixational Eye Movements in Ophthalmic Disease: Implications for Visual Function and Clinical Assessment</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/100">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050100</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Sophia Castro
		Nancy O. Mahfouz
		Simrat Renu
		Kathiana Jeanty
		Elana Safonova
		Doris Prela
		Ola Abozid
		Ayesha Mulla
		Josey M. Spiers
		Robert G. Alexander
		</p>
	<p>Ophthalmic disorders cause pathological abnormalities in fixational movements. Across disorders, recent studies demonstrate that fixation can be disrupted, often with reported changes in stability and other oculomotor dynamics as the conditions progress. Some of these changes are functionally linked to reduced visual acuity, degraded reading performance, and impaired binocular function. In this narrative review, we synthesize recent work on fixational eye movements and fixation instability in ophthalmic disease. We argue that fixational measures may provide research biomarkers and clinical correlates of disease progression. These metrics could eventually contribute to treatment monitoring applications. The development of accessible and non-invasive eye-tracking tools could enhance clinical interventions. Continued progress will depend on establishing robust normative datasets and determining which oculomotor metrics provide reliable clinical information across disease states.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Abnormal Fixational Eye Movements in Ophthalmic Disease: Implications for Visual Function and Clinical Assessment</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Sophia Castro</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nancy O. Mahfouz</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Simrat Renu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kathiana Jeanty</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Elana Safonova</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Doris Prela</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ola Abozid</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ayesha Mulla</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Josey M. Spiers</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Robert G. Alexander</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050100</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-09-09</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-09</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>100</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050100</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/100</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/99">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 99: Systematic Performance Evaluation of WebGazer Webcam-Based Eye Tracking with Spatial and Angular Error Analysis</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/99</link>
	<description>Eye tracking technologies have become increasingly accessible through webcam-based solutions such as WebGazer, enabling large-scale and low-cost experimentation. However, their performance remains sensitive to several experimental and device-related parameters. This study presents a controlled experimental framework developed to systematically evaluate WebGazer under configurable experimental conditions. Within this framework, we design and implement a controlled experimental protocol to investigate the effect of key parameters, including (i) joint calibration/evaluation point-density configuration, (ii) evaluation-point distribution, (iii) target presentation duration, (iv) stimulus color, and (v) stimulus (target) size. WebGazer&amp;amp;rsquo;s performance is assessed using both device-pixel spatial error metrics and angular error (delta), providing complementary measures of gaze accuracy. Results from 20 participants show that denser point configurations were associated with lower mean spatial error, from 1383 to 1009 device pixels, and lower mean angular error, from 13.556 to 10.322 degrees, within the tested conditions. Across the aggregated condition summaries, the joint point-density configuration showed the widest spatial-error range, whereas target presentation duration showed the widest angular-error range. Taken together, these two factors displayed the clearest descriptive differences, followed by evaluation-point distribution. Pseudo-random layouts were associated with moderately higher errors than fixed layouts. In contrast, visual properties such as color and size showed comparatively smaller and less consistent differences, with stimulus size displaying a non-monotonic pattern. Overall, temporal and calibration-related settings showed the clearest descriptive associations with WebGazer performance, while visual design choices showed smaller differences. This study provides a practical quantitative framework for systematically assessing webcam-based eye tracking systems under realistic usage conditions.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-09-08</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 99: Systematic Performance Evaluation of WebGazer Webcam-Based Eye Tracking with Spatial and Angular Error Analysis</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/99">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050099</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Evgenia Psarra
		Vassilios Krassanakis
		Anastasios L. Kesidis
		</p>
	<p>Eye tracking technologies have become increasingly accessible through webcam-based solutions such as WebGazer, enabling large-scale and low-cost experimentation. However, their performance remains sensitive to several experimental and device-related parameters. This study presents a controlled experimental framework developed to systematically evaluate WebGazer under configurable experimental conditions. Within this framework, we design and implement a controlled experimental protocol to investigate the effect of key parameters, including (i) joint calibration/evaluation point-density configuration, (ii) evaluation-point distribution, (iii) target presentation duration, (iv) stimulus color, and (v) stimulus (target) size. WebGazer&amp;amp;rsquo;s performance is assessed using both device-pixel spatial error metrics and angular error (delta), providing complementary measures of gaze accuracy. Results from 20 participants show that denser point configurations were associated with lower mean spatial error, from 1383 to 1009 device pixels, and lower mean angular error, from 13.556 to 10.322 degrees, within the tested conditions. Across the aggregated condition summaries, the joint point-density configuration showed the widest spatial-error range, whereas target presentation duration showed the widest angular-error range. Taken together, these two factors displayed the clearest descriptive differences, followed by evaluation-point distribution. Pseudo-random layouts were associated with moderately higher errors than fixed layouts. In contrast, visual properties such as color and size showed comparatively smaller and less consistent differences, with stimulus size displaying a non-monotonic pattern. Overall, temporal and calibration-related settings showed the clearest descriptive associations with WebGazer performance, while visual design choices showed smaller differences. This study provides a practical quantitative framework for systematically assessing webcam-based eye tracking systems under realistic usage conditions.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Systematic Performance Evaluation of WebGazer Webcam-Based Eye Tracking with Spatial and Angular Error Analysis</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Evgenia Psarra</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Vassilios Krassanakis</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anastasios L. Kesidis</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050099</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-09-08</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050099</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/99</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/98">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 98: Evaluation of the Wearable Eye Tracker Pupil Labs Neon for Gaze Fixation Analysis in Screen-Based Fixation Tasks: Comparison with Tobii Pro Fusion</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/98</link>
	<description>Wearable eye-tracking devices are primarily used for eye movement analysis in real-world environments. Owing to their increasing availability and ability to provide measurements with high ecological validity, it is important to determine whether they can also be applied to gaze fixation analysis involving screen-based stimuli. This study evaluated the performance of the wearable eye tracker Pupil Labs Neon for gaze fixation analysis under controlled laboratory conditions by comparing it with the screen-based Tobii Pro Fusion. A total of 46 participants were enrolled in the study. Eye-tracker accuracy was assessed across different gaze directions, whereas fixation stability was evaluated exclusively during central fixation. Tobii Pro Fusion demonstrated significantly higher overall accuracy compared to Pupil Labs Neon. Notably, the accuracy of both devices was affected by stimulus background. Furthermore, the Tobii Pro Fusion showed significantly better accuracy at central positions than at peripheral gaze positions; in contrast the Pupil Labs Neon exhibited no significant variations in relation to stimulus eccentricity. Finally, no significant differences in fixation stability during central fixation were observed between the two devices. Considering its significantly higher overall accuracy, Tobii Pro Fusion appears better suited for gaze fixation analysis in screen-based tasks, especially within the central positions, whereas Pupil Labs Neon may provide more stable data quality across different gaze positions.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-09-05</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 98: Evaluation of the Wearable Eye Tracker Pupil Labs Neon for Gaze Fixation Analysis in Screen-Based Fixation Tasks: Comparison with Tobii Pro Fusion</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/98">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050098</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Madara Alecka
		Evita Serpa
		Viktorija Arhipenko
		Linda Krauze
		Ilze Ceple
		</p>
	<p>Wearable eye-tracking devices are primarily used for eye movement analysis in real-world environments. Owing to their increasing availability and ability to provide measurements with high ecological validity, it is important to determine whether they can also be applied to gaze fixation analysis involving screen-based stimuli. This study evaluated the performance of the wearable eye tracker Pupil Labs Neon for gaze fixation analysis under controlled laboratory conditions by comparing it with the screen-based Tobii Pro Fusion. A total of 46 participants were enrolled in the study. Eye-tracker accuracy was assessed across different gaze directions, whereas fixation stability was evaluated exclusively during central fixation. Tobii Pro Fusion demonstrated significantly higher overall accuracy compared to Pupil Labs Neon. Notably, the accuracy of both devices was affected by stimulus background. Furthermore, the Tobii Pro Fusion showed significantly better accuracy at central positions than at peripheral gaze positions; in contrast the Pupil Labs Neon exhibited no significant variations in relation to stimulus eccentricity. Finally, no significant differences in fixation stability during central fixation were observed between the two devices. Considering its significantly higher overall accuracy, Tobii Pro Fusion appears better suited for gaze fixation analysis in screen-based tasks, especially within the central positions, whereas Pupil Labs Neon may provide more stable data quality across different gaze positions.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Evaluation of the Wearable Eye Tracker Pupil Labs Neon for Gaze Fixation Analysis in Screen-Based Fixation Tasks: Comparison with Tobii Pro Fusion</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Madara Alecka</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Evita Serpa</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Viktorija Arhipenko</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Linda Krauze</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ilze Ceple</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050098</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-09-05</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-05</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>98</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050098</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/98</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/97">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 97: Eye Tracking and AI-Generated Content: A Systematic Literature Review of Visual Attention, Cognitive Processing, and User Engagement</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/97</link>
	<description>Generative artificial intelligence increasingly produces text, images, feedback, summaries, advertisements, synthetic faces, and audiovisual content evaluated alongside human-produced material. This systematic review synthesized comparative eye-tracking evidence on visual attention, cognitive processing, and engagement with AI-generated content. Searches of Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed yielded 896 records; 23 studies met the eligibility criteria and contributed 778 participants in the review-relevant eye-tracking components. The evidence covered textual, static visual, audiovisual, and interactive outputs. Across heterogeneous designs and tasks, no modality-independent gaze pattern emerged. AI-generated material sometimes attracted more focal inspection, sometimes received less task-relevant attention, and often redistributed gaze across interface elements. Where supported by task characteristics or complementary outcomes, longer viewing was more often associated with processing difficulty, uncertainty, or checking than with preference. Generated summaries supported learning in some settings, whereas realistic synthetic media remained difficult to identify despite focused inspection. Methodological appraisal identified recurrent limitations in sampling, stimulus matching, confounder control, eye-tracking reporting, and documentation of model versions, prompts, generation settings, and output selection. Observed gaze differences were context-dependent and varied with modality, task, comparator, source belief, expertise, output quality, and measurement choices. Standardized reporting and stronger links between gaze and functional outcomes are needed for cumulative inference.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-09-04</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 97: Eye Tracking and AI-Generated Content: A Systematic Literature Review of Visual Attention, Cognitive Processing, and User Engagement</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/97">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050097</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Hakile Resulbegoviq
		Valentina Hlebec
		Mirjana Pejić Bach
		Irina Stamatović
		</p>
	<p>Generative artificial intelligence increasingly produces text, images, feedback, summaries, advertisements, synthetic faces, and audiovisual content evaluated alongside human-produced material. This systematic review synthesized comparative eye-tracking evidence on visual attention, cognitive processing, and engagement with AI-generated content. Searches of Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed yielded 896 records; 23 studies met the eligibility criteria and contributed 778 participants in the review-relevant eye-tracking components. The evidence covered textual, static visual, audiovisual, and interactive outputs. Across heterogeneous designs and tasks, no modality-independent gaze pattern emerged. AI-generated material sometimes attracted more focal inspection, sometimes received less task-relevant attention, and often redistributed gaze across interface elements. Where supported by task characteristics or complementary outcomes, longer viewing was more often associated with processing difficulty, uncertainty, or checking than with preference. Generated summaries supported learning in some settings, whereas realistic synthetic media remained difficult to identify despite focused inspection. Methodological appraisal identified recurrent limitations in sampling, stimulus matching, confounder control, eye-tracking reporting, and documentation of model versions, prompts, generation settings, and output selection. Observed gaze differences were context-dependent and varied with modality, task, comparator, source belief, expertise, output quality, and measurement choices. Standardized reporting and stronger links between gaze and functional outcomes are needed for cumulative inference.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Eye Tracking and AI-Generated Content: A Systematic Literature Review of Visual Attention, Cognitive Processing, and User Engagement</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Hakile Resulbegoviq</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Valentina Hlebec</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mirjana Pejić Bach</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Irina Stamatović</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050097</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-09-04</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-04</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Systematic Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>97</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050097</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/97</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/96">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 96: Looking to Deceive: Voluntary Gaze Control Reduces the Discriminative Power of Eye-Movement-Based Concealed Information Testing</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/96</link>
	<description>The Concealed Information Test (CIT) detects whether an individual recognizes crime-relevant information, and eye tracking has been proposed as a non-invasive method for detecting this recognition. It remains unclear, however, whether individuals who are motivated to conceal their knowledge can voluntarily control their gaze and thereby undermine the test’s validity. We developed a novel free-viewing, parallel-presentation eye-movement-based CIT and administered it to 75 participants randomly assigned to three groups: Innocent, Informed Innocent, and Guilty. For each participant, twelve eye-tracking measures were calculated as differential (crime-relevant minus control) scores and analyzed using four supervised classifiers under a participant-wise, leave-two-out cross-validation, with accuracy reported at both the trial and participant levels. Cumulative dwell- and duration-based measures, together with glance and fixation counts, carried most of the discriminative signal. The classifiers demonstrated high accuracy when distinguishing between the naive and knowledgeable but non-concealing individuals, as well as between knowledgeable non-concealing individuals and culpable individuals. However, classification performance fell to chance-level probability when distinguishing naive and culpable individuals. Thus, participants who were motivated to avoid detection markedly reduced their distinctive eye-movement signature with voluntary gaze control, becoming indistinguishable from truly naive individuals. We discuss methodological implications for designing eye-movement-based CITs that exhibit greater resilience against voluntary gaze modulation.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-09-02</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 96: Looking to Deceive: Voluntary Gaze Control Reduces the Discriminative Power of Eye-Movement-Based Concealed Information Testing</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/96">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050096</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Nikola Milosavljević
		Miloš Panjevac
		Milica Janković
		Vanja Ković
		</p>
	<p>The Concealed Information Test (CIT) detects whether an individual recognizes crime-relevant information, and eye tracking has been proposed as a non-invasive method for detecting this recognition. It remains unclear, however, whether individuals who are motivated to conceal their knowledge can voluntarily control their gaze and thereby undermine the test’s validity. We developed a novel free-viewing, parallel-presentation eye-movement-based CIT and administered it to 75 participants randomly assigned to three groups: Innocent, Informed Innocent, and Guilty. For each participant, twelve eye-tracking measures were calculated as differential (crime-relevant minus control) scores and analyzed using four supervised classifiers under a participant-wise, leave-two-out cross-validation, with accuracy reported at both the trial and participant levels. Cumulative dwell- and duration-based measures, together with glance and fixation counts, carried most of the discriminative signal. The classifiers demonstrated high accuracy when distinguishing between the naive and knowledgeable but non-concealing individuals, as well as between knowledgeable non-concealing individuals and culpable individuals. However, classification performance fell to chance-level probability when distinguishing naive and culpable individuals. Thus, participants who were motivated to avoid detection markedly reduced their distinctive eye-movement signature with voluntary gaze control, becoming indistinguishable from truly naive individuals. We discuss methodological implications for designing eye-movement-based CITs that exhibit greater resilience against voluntary gaze modulation.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Looking to Deceive: Voluntary Gaze Control Reduces the Discriminative Power of Eye-Movement-Based Concealed Information Testing</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Nikola Milosavljević</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Miloš Panjevac</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Milica Janković</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Vanja Ković</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050096</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-09-02</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-02</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>96</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050096</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/96</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/95">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 95: Lexical Context Effects During Reading: The Impact of Vocabulary Knowledge and Word Frequency</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/95</link>
	<description>Skilled readers are thought to rely on bottom-up processing to activate word meanings in long-term memory from their form (i.e., spelling or sound) in a process described as ‘context-free’ lexical processing. However, other research suggests skilled readers recognize words faster when they appear in predictable and/or plausible contexts, despite efficient bottom-up processing. Research on individual differences in skilled comprehension suggests skilled readers only use context to support word recognition when bottom-up processing is slow. Therefore, highly skilled readers may not rely on context, but less-skilled readers may continue to rely on context during word recognition due to poor bottom-up processing. The current study investigated whether individual differences in lexical quality would influence contextual processing during word recognition. Participants’ eye movements were tracked as they read sentences containing either a high-frequency (e.g., baby) or low-frequency (e.g., elbow) target word preceded by either a related prime word (mother–baby) or an unrelated control word (teeth–elbow). Results show relatedness had a significant effect on readers across the range of lexical knowledge; however, the specific effect depended on both vocabulary and target word frequency. The results suggest that context supports word recognition and comprehension when readers have adequate vocabulary.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-08-27</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 95: Lexical Context Effects During Reading: The Impact of Vocabulary Knowledge and Word Frequency</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/95">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050095</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Ashley Abraham
		Jocelyn Folk
		</p>
	<p>Skilled readers are thought to rely on bottom-up processing to activate word meanings in long-term memory from their form (i.e., spelling or sound) in a process described as ‘context-free’ lexical processing. However, other research suggests skilled readers recognize words faster when they appear in predictable and/or plausible contexts, despite efficient bottom-up processing. Research on individual differences in skilled comprehension suggests skilled readers only use context to support word recognition when bottom-up processing is slow. Therefore, highly skilled readers may not rely on context, but less-skilled readers may continue to rely on context during word recognition due to poor bottom-up processing. The current study investigated whether individual differences in lexical quality would influence contextual processing during word recognition. Participants’ eye movements were tracked as they read sentences containing either a high-frequency (e.g., baby) or low-frequency (e.g., elbow) target word preceded by either a related prime word (mother–baby) or an unrelated control word (teeth–elbow). Results show relatedness had a significant effect on readers across the range of lexical knowledge; however, the specific effect depended on both vocabulary and target word frequency. The results suggest that context supports word recognition and comprehension when readers have adequate vocabulary.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Lexical Context Effects During Reading: The Impact of Vocabulary Knowledge and Word Frequency</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Ashley Abraham</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jocelyn Folk</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050095</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-08-27</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-27</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>95</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050095</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/95</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/94">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 94: Saccadic Oscillations After Donepezil Administration in Patients with Dementia: Time Course and Clinical Correlates</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/94</link>
	<description>Donepezil, a cholinesterase inhibitor widely used in dementia, can be associated with saccadic oscillations (SO), but their time course and clinical relevance are unclear. In this prospective observational study, 18 patients with dementia underwent video-oculography at baseline (V0), one month (V1), and three months (V2) after initiation or dose escalation of donepezil. SO were counted over a single 30 s recording during visual fixation and in darkness, expressed as events/30 s. Dizziness was assessed with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and the Vestibular Disorders Activities of Daily Living (VADL) scale. Timepoints were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and within-patient associations by repeated-measures correlation (rmcorr). SO with fixation increased from a median of 0.0 (interquartile range 0.0&amp;amp;ndash;1.0) events/30 s at V0 to 13.5 (7.2&amp;amp;ndash;15.8) at V1 (unadjusted p = 0.008, adjusted p = 0.023), then declined, but the difference from baseline lost statistical significance after multiple-comparison adjustment at V2 (6.5 [0.0&amp;amp;ndash;11.5]; unadjusted p = 0.031, adjusted p = 0.063). SO without fixation did not change (all p &amp;amp;gt; 0.12). On rmcorr, SO without fixation was associated with the VADL (r = 0.59, p = 0.005) but neither measure was associated with the DHI. A transient, fixation-specific increase in SO was observed, peaking at one month and only partially resolved by three months; it correlated with functional disability rather than subjective handicap, suggesting that video-oculography warrants further study as a potential pharmacodynamic correlate of cholinergic drug effect in dementia.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-08-27</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 94: Saccadic Oscillations After Donepezil Administration in Patients with Dementia: Time Course and Clinical Correlates</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/94">doi: 10.3390/jemr19050094</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Ileok Jung
		Ji-Soo Kim
		Moon-Ho Park
		</p>
	<p>Donepezil, a cholinesterase inhibitor widely used in dementia, can be associated with saccadic oscillations (SO), but their time course and clinical relevance are unclear. In this prospective observational study, 18 patients with dementia underwent video-oculography at baseline (V0), one month (V1), and three months (V2) after initiation or dose escalation of donepezil. SO were counted over a single 30 s recording during visual fixation and in darkness, expressed as events/30 s. Dizziness was assessed with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and the Vestibular Disorders Activities of Daily Living (VADL) scale. Timepoints were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and within-patient associations by repeated-measures correlation (rmcorr). SO with fixation increased from a median of 0.0 (interquartile range 0.0&amp;amp;ndash;1.0) events/30 s at V0 to 13.5 (7.2&amp;amp;ndash;15.8) at V1 (unadjusted p = 0.008, adjusted p = 0.023), then declined, but the difference from baseline lost statistical significance after multiple-comparison adjustment at V2 (6.5 [0.0&amp;amp;ndash;11.5]; unadjusted p = 0.031, adjusted p = 0.063). SO without fixation did not change (all p &amp;amp;gt; 0.12). On rmcorr, SO without fixation was associated with the VADL (r = 0.59, p = 0.005) but neither measure was associated with the DHI. A transient, fixation-specific increase in SO was observed, peaking at one month and only partially resolved by three months; it correlated with functional disability rather than subjective handicap, suggesting that video-oculography warrants further study as a potential pharmacodynamic correlate of cholinergic drug effect in dementia.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Saccadic Oscillations After Donepezil Administration in Patients with Dementia: Time Course and Clinical Correlates</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Ileok Jung</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ji-Soo Kim</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Moon-Ho Park</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19050094</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-08-27</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-27</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>94</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19050094</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/5/94</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/93">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 93: Contribution of Eye Movements to Primary-School Children’s Silent Reading Speed: Evidence from Ex-Gaussian Analysis</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/93</link>
	<description>Reading speed, a core indicator of reading performance, requires efficient oculomotor behavior. While well-documented in adults, the contribution of eye movements to children’s silent reading speed and grade-related changes remain underspecified. Furthermore, the distributional properties of fixation durations have rarely been examined in children. This study investigates how changes in eye-movement parameters associate with individual differences in children’s silent reading speed. The eye movements of 194 typically developing Greek-speaking students (Grades 3–6) were recorded during silent reading of short passages. An Ex-Gaussian distributional analysis was applied to fixation durations, alongside traditional measures of mean fixation number, fixation duration, and saccade amplitude. Language and cognitive abilities were also evaluated. Silent reading speed increased with grade, driven by fewer and shorter fixations, and longer saccades. After accounting for age, vocabulary and cognitive measures, eye-movement parameters increased the explained variance in silent reading speed to 80% (adjusted R2 = 0.800) in the full sample (N = 194). The Ex-Gaussian parameter τ was an independent predictor, distinct from mean fixation duration. Finally, age significantly moderated the association between forward fixations and silent reading speed. These findings indicate that oculomotor behavior is independently linked to children’s silent reading speed across primary school years, as captured both by conventional and distributional oculomotor parameters.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-08-20</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 93: Contribution of Eye Movements to Primary-School Children’s Silent Reading Speed: Evidence from Ex-Gaussian Analysis</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/93">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040093</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Angeliki Gleni
		Sotiris Plainis
		Angeliki Mouzaki
		Miltiadis Tsilimbaris
		Panagiota Dimitropoulou
		Panagiotis Simos
		</p>
	<p>Reading speed, a core indicator of reading performance, requires efficient oculomotor behavior. While well-documented in adults, the contribution of eye movements to children’s silent reading speed and grade-related changes remain underspecified. Furthermore, the distributional properties of fixation durations have rarely been examined in children. This study investigates how changes in eye-movement parameters associate with individual differences in children’s silent reading speed. The eye movements of 194 typically developing Greek-speaking students (Grades 3–6) were recorded during silent reading of short passages. An Ex-Gaussian distributional analysis was applied to fixation durations, alongside traditional measures of mean fixation number, fixation duration, and saccade amplitude. Language and cognitive abilities were also evaluated. Silent reading speed increased with grade, driven by fewer and shorter fixations, and longer saccades. After accounting for age, vocabulary and cognitive measures, eye-movement parameters increased the explained variance in silent reading speed to 80% (adjusted R2 = 0.800) in the full sample (N = 194). The Ex-Gaussian parameter τ was an independent predictor, distinct from mean fixation duration. Finally, age significantly moderated the association between forward fixations and silent reading speed. These findings indicate that oculomotor behavior is independently linked to children’s silent reading speed across primary school years, as captured both by conventional and distributional oculomotor parameters.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Contribution of Eye Movements to Primary-School Children’s Silent Reading Speed: Evidence from Ex-Gaussian Analysis</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Angeliki Gleni</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sotiris Plainis</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Angeliki Mouzaki</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Miltiadis Tsilimbaris</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Panagiota Dimitropoulou</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Panagiotis Simos</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040093</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-08-20</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-20</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>93</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040093</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/93</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/92">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 92: Effects of Presentation Form and Presentation Timing in AR-HUD Takeover Displays on Driver Visual Attention: An Eye-Tracking Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/92</link>
	<description>Level 3 automated driving necessitates rapid driver reengagement following a takeover request, making human&amp;amp;ndash;machine interface design critical for safety. As a sensor-based in-vehicle interface, the augmented reality head-up display (AR-HUD) integrates real-time environmental sensing with visual information delivery, yet how different information presentation strategies influence driver visual attention during takeover remains underexplored. We examined the effects of presentation form (static/dynamic) and presentation timing (concurrent/progressive) using a 2 &amp;amp;times; 2 within-subject design. In the experiment, twenty-one licensed drivers viewed prerecorded automated driving takeover scenarios. Eye tracking measured mean fixation duration, mean saccade amplitude, time to first fixation, and fixation count, while ratings assessed usability, acceptance, and intention comprehension. Progressive presentation significantly reduced all eye-tracking measures and improved perceived usability ratings compared with concurrent presentation. This pattern indicates more concentrated and orderly gaze allocation and is consistent with lower visual-search and information-integration demands. However, the lower fixation count may partly reflect reduced information exposure. Static presentation reduced mean fixation duration but showed no consistent overall advantage on the remaining measures. Significant form-by-timing interactions showed that progressive presentation reduced saccade amplitude and time to first fixation and improved intention comprehension under static, but not dynamic, presentation. Among the four combinations, static-progressive presentation yielded the most favorable overall pattern. Overall, presentation timing affected more measured outcomes than presentation form. These findings provide preliminary evidence that presentation form and presentation timing shape gaze behavior and subjective evaluations of AR-HUD takeover displays.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-08-20</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 92: Effects of Presentation Form and Presentation Timing in AR-HUD Takeover Displays on Driver Visual Attention: An Eye-Tracking Study</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/92">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040092</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Kexin Chen
		Junfeng Li
		Mo Chen
		</p>
	<p>Level 3 automated driving necessitates rapid driver reengagement following a takeover request, making human&amp;amp;ndash;machine interface design critical for safety. As a sensor-based in-vehicle interface, the augmented reality head-up display (AR-HUD) integrates real-time environmental sensing with visual information delivery, yet how different information presentation strategies influence driver visual attention during takeover remains underexplored. We examined the effects of presentation form (static/dynamic) and presentation timing (concurrent/progressive) using a 2 &amp;amp;times; 2 within-subject design. In the experiment, twenty-one licensed drivers viewed prerecorded automated driving takeover scenarios. Eye tracking measured mean fixation duration, mean saccade amplitude, time to first fixation, and fixation count, while ratings assessed usability, acceptance, and intention comprehension. Progressive presentation significantly reduced all eye-tracking measures and improved perceived usability ratings compared with concurrent presentation. This pattern indicates more concentrated and orderly gaze allocation and is consistent with lower visual-search and information-integration demands. However, the lower fixation count may partly reflect reduced information exposure. Static presentation reduced mean fixation duration but showed no consistent overall advantage on the remaining measures. Significant form-by-timing interactions showed that progressive presentation reduced saccade amplitude and time to first fixation and improved intention comprehension under static, but not dynamic, presentation. Among the four combinations, static-progressive presentation yielded the most favorable overall pattern. Overall, presentation timing affected more measured outcomes than presentation form. These findings provide preliminary evidence that presentation form and presentation timing shape gaze behavior and subjective evaluations of AR-HUD takeover displays.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Effects of Presentation Form and Presentation Timing in AR-HUD Takeover Displays on Driver Visual Attention: An Eye-Tracking Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Kexin Chen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Junfeng Li</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mo Chen</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040092</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-08-20</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-20</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>92</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040092</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/92</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/91">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 91: Eye and Gaze Behavior During Human Disassembly Procedures: Effects of Task Conditions and Process Dynamics</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/91</link>
	<description>Manual disassembly is a key process in remanufacturing and circular-economy systems, yet it is often characterized by uncertainty, varying product conditions and non-standardized action sequences. Eye tracking provides a process-oriented methodology for examining how such tasks are visually guided, with implications for human behavior analysis, operator support, and automation design. The present study investigated the potential of specific eye and gaze metrics to reflect differences in task condition and process dynamics during human disassembly. These were analyzed using a dimension-based mixed-effect modeling approach, accounting for task condition, handcraft skill levels, and task duration across repeated observations within participants, addressing four dimensions: visual attention allocation, cognitive workload, scanpath structure, and gaze organization. The results showed that increased task uncertainty was most associated with shorter fixation durations, higher fixation rates, larger pupil diameters, and higher revisit rates, indicating intensified visual sampling, increased cognitive workload, and repeated checking behavior. No robust differences were observed between skill levels. A longer task duration, as an indirect proxy of less routine-like execution, was primarily reflected in fixation dynamics and scanpath structure, rather than in entropy or workload measures. The findings demonstrate the sensitivity of eye and gaze metrics to task uncertainty and process dynamics in disassembly.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-08-18</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 91: Eye and Gaze Behavior During Human Disassembly Procedures: Effects of Task Conditions and Process Dynamics</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/91">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040091</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Manuel Zaremski
		Barbara Deml
		</p>
	<p>Manual disassembly is a key process in remanufacturing and circular-economy systems, yet it is often characterized by uncertainty, varying product conditions and non-standardized action sequences. Eye tracking provides a process-oriented methodology for examining how such tasks are visually guided, with implications for human behavior analysis, operator support, and automation design. The present study investigated the potential of specific eye and gaze metrics to reflect differences in task condition and process dynamics during human disassembly. These were analyzed using a dimension-based mixed-effect modeling approach, accounting for task condition, handcraft skill levels, and task duration across repeated observations within participants, addressing four dimensions: visual attention allocation, cognitive workload, scanpath structure, and gaze organization. The results showed that increased task uncertainty was most associated with shorter fixation durations, higher fixation rates, larger pupil diameters, and higher revisit rates, indicating intensified visual sampling, increased cognitive workload, and repeated checking behavior. No robust differences were observed between skill levels. A longer task duration, as an indirect proxy of less routine-like execution, was primarily reflected in fixation dynamics and scanpath structure, rather than in entropy or workload measures. The findings demonstrate the sensitivity of eye and gaze metrics to task uncertainty and process dynamics in disassembly.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Eye and Gaze Behavior During Human Disassembly Procedures: Effects of Task Conditions and Process Dynamics</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Manuel Zaremski</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Barbara Deml</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040091</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-08-18</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-18</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>91</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040091</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/91</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/90">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 90: Layered Development of Visual Search Expertise in Architects</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/90</link>
	<description>It is widely proposed that perceptual expertise is characterized by an increased reliance on peripheral visual information during search, as described by Holistic Visual Processing (HVP) theory. HVP predicts that experts make longer saccades to construct a holistic representation of the visual scene and facilitate target detection. Our previous work challenged this prediction by showing that expert architects made shorter, rather than longer, saccades during visual search. The present study investigated how this atypical search strategy develops by comparing expert architects, intermediate architects, and na&amp;amp;iuml;ve observers performing the same visual search task. Intermediate architects exhibited shorter saccades than na&amp;amp;iuml;ve observers, but not to the extent observed in experts, while demonstrating search efficiency intermediate to the two groups. Analyses of the temporal organization of search further revealed that intermediate architects had already adopted the overall structure of the expert search strategy despite not yet exhibiting expert-level reductions in saccadic amplitude. These findings suggest that perceptual expertise in architecture develops through a layered progression in which the organization of visual search precedes the full refinement of eye movement behavior. More broadly, these findings suggest that eye movement research should interpret gaze metrics such as saccadic amplitude within the context of domain-specific task demands and developmental stage, while considering the temporal organization of search as an additional window into the emergence of perceptual expertise.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-08-17</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 90: Layered Development of Visual Search Expertise in Architects</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/90">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040090</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Spencer Ivy
		K. Hudson Guttman
		Trafton Drew
		Jeanine K. Stefanucci
		</p>
	<p>It is widely proposed that perceptual expertise is characterized by an increased reliance on peripheral visual information during search, as described by Holistic Visual Processing (HVP) theory. HVP predicts that experts make longer saccades to construct a holistic representation of the visual scene and facilitate target detection. Our previous work challenged this prediction by showing that expert architects made shorter, rather than longer, saccades during visual search. The present study investigated how this atypical search strategy develops by comparing expert architects, intermediate architects, and na&amp;amp;iuml;ve observers performing the same visual search task. Intermediate architects exhibited shorter saccades than na&amp;amp;iuml;ve observers, but not to the extent observed in experts, while demonstrating search efficiency intermediate to the two groups. Analyses of the temporal organization of search further revealed that intermediate architects had already adopted the overall structure of the expert search strategy despite not yet exhibiting expert-level reductions in saccadic amplitude. These findings suggest that perceptual expertise in architecture develops through a layered progression in which the organization of visual search precedes the full refinement of eye movement behavior. More broadly, these findings suggest that eye movement research should interpret gaze metrics such as saccadic amplitude within the context of domain-specific task demands and developmental stage, while considering the temporal organization of search as an additional window into the emergence of perceptual expertise.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Layered Development of Visual Search Expertise in Architects</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Spencer Ivy</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>K. Hudson Guttman</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Trafton Drew</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jeanine K. Stefanucci</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040090</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-08-17</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>90</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040090</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/90</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/89">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 89: How Source Attribution Visualization Shapes User Attention and Preference: An Eye-Tracking Study of Four AI Chatbot Layouts</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/89</link>
	<description>As generative AI chatbots become a primary information channel, users increasingly accept answers without verification, and citations can raise trust even when sources are irrelevant or fabricated. How source-attribution visualization shapes the visual preconditions of verification remains unknown: users can notice, read, or compare a source without clicking. This within-subjects eye-tracking study (N = 23; 92 trials) evaluated four attribution visualizations abstracted from commercial AI chatbots and rendered as simulated screens: inline component (sentence-end chips), card list (cards above the answer), side panel (adjacent panel), and raw hyperlink (bare URLs), combining gaze metrics, surveys, and interviews. Repeated-measures ANOVAs revealed strong layout effects on source discoverability and engagement, largely robust to sensitivity checks (the panel’s discovery latency was order-sensitive): the card list was discovered almost immediately, with the raw hyperlink last. Yet no self-reported measure differed detectably. The most frequently nominated format, the inline component, attracted about half the dwell time of the stand-alone formats, whose prolonged fixations suggested citation-to-text mapping cost rather than genuine engagement. This attention–preference gap means both must be measured jointly. We contribute a four-layout gaze-based comparison, a reproducible participant-level analysis workflow, and three design principles (pre-click identifiability, sentence-level claim–source mapping, and in situ preview) within a proposed two-stage attribution architecture.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-08-14</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 89: How Source Attribution Visualization Shapes User Attention and Preference: An Eye-Tracking Study of Four AI Chatbot Layouts</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/89">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040089</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Junho Cho
		Dokshin Lim
		</p>
	<p>As generative AI chatbots become a primary information channel, users increasingly accept answers without verification, and citations can raise trust even when sources are irrelevant or fabricated. How source-attribution visualization shapes the visual preconditions of verification remains unknown: users can notice, read, or compare a source without clicking. This within-subjects eye-tracking study (N = 23; 92 trials) evaluated four attribution visualizations abstracted from commercial AI chatbots and rendered as simulated screens: inline component (sentence-end chips), card list (cards above the answer), side panel (adjacent panel), and raw hyperlink (bare URLs), combining gaze metrics, surveys, and interviews. Repeated-measures ANOVAs revealed strong layout effects on source discoverability and engagement, largely robust to sensitivity checks (the panel’s discovery latency was order-sensitive): the card list was discovered almost immediately, with the raw hyperlink last. Yet no self-reported measure differed detectably. The most frequently nominated format, the inline component, attracted about half the dwell time of the stand-alone formats, whose prolonged fixations suggested citation-to-text mapping cost rather than genuine engagement. This attention–preference gap means both must be measured jointly. We contribute a four-layout gaze-based comparison, a reproducible participant-level analysis workflow, and three design principles (pre-click identifiability, sentence-level claim–source mapping, and in situ preview) within a proposed two-stage attribution architecture.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>How Source Attribution Visualization Shapes User Attention and Preference: An Eye-Tracking Study of Four AI Chatbot Layouts</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Junho Cho</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Dokshin Lim</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040089</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-08-14</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-14</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>89</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040089</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/89</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/88">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 88: Uncertainty-Aware General Gaze Following via Circular Direction Distribution Learning and Probabilistic Gaze Geometry Modeling</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/88</link>
	<description>General gaze following aims to infer the region attended to by a person within a natural scene and offers a computational perspective on visual attention and social scene understanding. Existing direction-guided methods usually reduce gaze direction to a single vector or spatial mask. This deterministic treatment can obscure directional ambiguity, discard coexisting candidate directions, and propagate early estimation errors to gaze target localization when head cues are weak or multiple targets are plausible. To address these limitations, we propose an uncertainty-aware framework based on Circular Direction Distribution Learning (CDDL) and Probabilistic Gaze Geometry Modeling (PGGM). CDDL represents gaze direction as a 72-bin circular probability distribution under von Mises soft supervision, thereby preserving neighboring directional hypotheses before target localization. Rather than predicting a target space distribution directly, PGGM aggregates the direction distribution into 18 groups and projects the retained hypotheses into cone-like spatial probability fields, allowing spatial tolerance to expand with distance while preserving a channel-wise direction-to-region representation. The full probability volume is fused with the RGB scene image at the input level and processed by a ResNet-50-FPN network for gaze heatmap prediction. Controlled experiments on GazeFollow demonstrate competitive localization and support the contribution of direction-distribution learning and channel-wise geometric projection. Zero-shot transfer, dataset-level uncertainty and failure analyses, efficiency measurements, and qualitative results further indicate interpretable behavior together with domain-dependent and computational trade-offs.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-08-13</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 88: Uncertainty-Aware General Gaze Following via Circular Direction Distribution Learning and Probabilistic Gaze Geometry Modeling</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/88">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040088</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Yanzhao Li
		Jin Li
		Xiaona Zhang
		Hong Liang
		</p>
	<p>General gaze following aims to infer the region attended to by a person within a natural scene and offers a computational perspective on visual attention and social scene understanding. Existing direction-guided methods usually reduce gaze direction to a single vector or spatial mask. This deterministic treatment can obscure directional ambiguity, discard coexisting candidate directions, and propagate early estimation errors to gaze target localization when head cues are weak or multiple targets are plausible. To address these limitations, we propose an uncertainty-aware framework based on Circular Direction Distribution Learning (CDDL) and Probabilistic Gaze Geometry Modeling (PGGM). CDDL represents gaze direction as a 72-bin circular probability distribution under von Mises soft supervision, thereby preserving neighboring directional hypotheses before target localization. Rather than predicting a target space distribution directly, PGGM aggregates the direction distribution into 18 groups and projects the retained hypotheses into cone-like spatial probability fields, allowing spatial tolerance to expand with distance while preserving a channel-wise direction-to-region representation. The full probability volume is fused with the RGB scene image at the input level and processed by a ResNet-50-FPN network for gaze heatmap prediction. Controlled experiments on GazeFollow demonstrate competitive localization and support the contribution of direction-distribution learning and channel-wise geometric projection. Zero-shot transfer, dataset-level uncertainty and failure analyses, efficiency measurements, and qualitative results further indicate interpretable behavior together with domain-dependent and computational trade-offs.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Uncertainty-Aware General Gaze Following via Circular Direction Distribution Learning and Probabilistic Gaze Geometry Modeling</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Yanzhao Li</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jin Li</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xiaona Zhang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hong Liang</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040088</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-08-13</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-13</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>88</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040088</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/88</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/87">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 87: Visual Attention and Strategic Sophistication in the Strategic Environment Effect: An Eye-Tracking Approach</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/87</link>
	<description>This study investigates how strategic environments shape a decision maker’s reasoning processes by incorporating visual attention and cognitive engagement. Using eye-tracking methods within experimental guessing games featuring interior equilibria, we analyze how strategic complementarity and substitutability alter choice behavior and cognitive engagement. We find that while choices diverge further from equilibrium under strategic complementarity, eye gaze metrics—specifically fixation and transition measures—are consistent with more intensive cognitive engagement under strategic substitutability. Furthermore, by using a novel approach to measure strategic sophistication, we find that individuals with higher strategic aptitude exhibit higher levels of visual engagement with the payoff table. As strategic sophistication increases, the two distinct dimensions of attention build up sequentially rather than together, with attention to an individual’s own strategies strengthening prior to attention to their opponents’. These findings indicate that visual attention is shaped systematically by the strategic environment and are consistent with a sequential organization of reasoning that may underlie the strategic environment effect.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-08-13</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 87: Visual Attention and Strategic Sophistication in the Strategic Environment Effect: An Eye-Tracking Approach</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/87">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040087</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Yukihiko Funaki
		Yukio Koriyama
		Ayano Nakagawa
		Ali Ozkes
		</p>
	<p>This study investigates how strategic environments shape a decision maker’s reasoning processes by incorporating visual attention and cognitive engagement. Using eye-tracking methods within experimental guessing games featuring interior equilibria, we analyze how strategic complementarity and substitutability alter choice behavior and cognitive engagement. We find that while choices diverge further from equilibrium under strategic complementarity, eye gaze metrics—specifically fixation and transition measures—are consistent with more intensive cognitive engagement under strategic substitutability. Furthermore, by using a novel approach to measure strategic sophistication, we find that individuals with higher strategic aptitude exhibit higher levels of visual engagement with the payoff table. As strategic sophistication increases, the two distinct dimensions of attention build up sequentially rather than together, with attention to an individual’s own strategies strengthening prior to attention to their opponents’. These findings indicate that visual attention is shaped systematically by the strategic environment and are consistent with a sequential organization of reasoning that may underlie the strategic environment effect.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Visual Attention and Strategic Sophistication in the Strategic Environment Effect: An Eye-Tracking Approach</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Yukihiko Funaki</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yukio Koriyama</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ayano Nakagawa</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ali Ozkes</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040087</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-08-13</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-13</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>87</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040087</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/87</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/86">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 86: Changes in Distance Ocular Deviation After Smartphone Viewing in Young Adults Without Manifest Strabismus</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/86</link>
	<description>Background: This prospective observational study assessed acute changes in distance ocular deviation after brief smartphone viewing in young adults without manifest strabismus and identified factors associated with the magnitude of change. Methods: Fifty-nine healthy young adults without strabismus (aged 20–30 years; mean ± standard deviation, 23.2 ± 2.5 years) wore a head-mounted eye-tracking system and viewed a smartphone for 30 min. Ocular deviation angles at near and distance fixation were measured immediately before and after smartphone viewing. During smartphone viewing, eye-movement parameters and smartphone distance were continuously recorded. Results: Before smartphone viewing, the mean deviation angles were −6.2 ± 6.8Δ and −2.0 ± 2.8Δ at near and distance fixation, respectively (negative values indicate exodeviation). After smartphone viewing, deviation angles shifted toward less exodeviation, measuring −4.3 ± 6.6Δ and −1.1 ± 2.4Δ at near and distance fixation, respectively. The magnitude of exodeviation reduction was negatively correlated with baseline ocular deviation, indicating that individuals with larger pre-viewing exodeviation exhibited greater alignment shifts after smartphone viewing. Eye-movement analysis revealed that gaze movements of &amp;amp;lt;30°/s accounted for 57.8% of detected gaze-movement events. Conclusions: Thirty minutes of smartphone viewing was followed by a reduction in exodeviation at near and distance fixation in young adults without manifest strabismus. Greater baseline exodeviation was associated with a larger reduction, and low-velocity gaze movements predominated.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-08-12</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 86: Changes in Distance Ocular Deviation After Smartphone Viewing in Young Adults Without Manifest Strabismus</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/86">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040086</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Miharu Mihara
		Noriko Katayama
		Ken Kakeue
		Mitsuya Otsuka
		Kazuichi Maruyama
		Atsushi Hayashi
		</p>
	<p>Background: This prospective observational study assessed acute changes in distance ocular deviation after brief smartphone viewing in young adults without manifest strabismus and identified factors associated with the magnitude of change. Methods: Fifty-nine healthy young adults without strabismus (aged 20–30 years; mean ± standard deviation, 23.2 ± 2.5 years) wore a head-mounted eye-tracking system and viewed a smartphone for 30 min. Ocular deviation angles at near and distance fixation were measured immediately before and after smartphone viewing. During smartphone viewing, eye-movement parameters and smartphone distance were continuously recorded. Results: Before smartphone viewing, the mean deviation angles were −6.2 ± 6.8Δ and −2.0 ± 2.8Δ at near and distance fixation, respectively (negative values indicate exodeviation). After smartphone viewing, deviation angles shifted toward less exodeviation, measuring −4.3 ± 6.6Δ and −1.1 ± 2.4Δ at near and distance fixation, respectively. The magnitude of exodeviation reduction was negatively correlated with baseline ocular deviation, indicating that individuals with larger pre-viewing exodeviation exhibited greater alignment shifts after smartphone viewing. Eye-movement analysis revealed that gaze movements of &amp;amp;lt;30°/s accounted for 57.8% of detected gaze-movement events. Conclusions: Thirty minutes of smartphone viewing was followed by a reduction in exodeviation at near and distance fixation in young adults without manifest strabismus. Greater baseline exodeviation was associated with a larger reduction, and low-velocity gaze movements predominated.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Changes in Distance Ocular Deviation After Smartphone Viewing in Young Adults Without Manifest Strabismus</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Miharu Mihara</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Noriko Katayama</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ken Kakeue</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mitsuya Otsuka</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kazuichi Maruyama</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Atsushi Hayashi</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040086</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-08-12</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-12</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>86</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040086</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/86</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/85">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 85: Participant-Independent Classification of Autism-Related Visual Attention Patterns from Eye-Tracking Scanpath Images Using a Global&amp;ndash;Local Fusion Network</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/85</link>
	<description>Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often exhibit atypical patterns of visual attention allocation and social-cue processing. Eye-tracking scanpath (ETSP) retains information about fixation points, saccade paths and their temporal changes in the form of images, providing an intuitive and computable data representation for analyzing ASD-related visual attention patterns. However, in ASD auxiliary identification studies, the same participant often generates multiple eye-tracking recordings or multiple visual representation samples. If participant independence is not properly considered during model evaluation, the training and test sets may share individualized eye-movement patterns from the same child. In such cases, the model may learn subject-specific characteristics rather than stable and transferable ASD-related visual attention features, leading to an overestimation of its recognition ability on unseen participants. To address this issue, we propose a Global&amp;amp;ndash;Local Collaborative Fusion Network (GLCF-Net) under a strict participant-independent splitting protocol. Specifically, the proposed method first maps ETSP images into patch token sequences through a shared Patch Embedding layer. A CNN-based local branch is then used to extract local trajectory morphology, path density, and spatial neighborhood structure, while a ViT-based global branch models cross-region gaze transitions and the overall attention distribution. Finally, a gated adaptive fusion module dynamically integrates local and global information to enhance the representation of stable visual attention features. In the primary repeated stratified five-fold participant-level evaluation, averaging the two out-of-fold probabilities for each participant yielded an Accuracy of 87.0% and a ROC-AUC of 93.7%; the original participant split, retained as a secondary analysis, yielded an Accuracy of 83.52% and a ROC-AUC of 90.27%. Under the reported frozen-backbone configurations, the model also showed a balanced pattern across Accuracy, Recall, and F1-score. These results characterize performance for unseen participants within the same dataset and acquisition conditions.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-08-10</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 85: Participant-Independent Classification of Autism-Related Visual Attention Patterns from Eye-Tracking Scanpath Images Using a Global&amp;ndash;Local Fusion Network</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/85">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040085</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Kun Zhang
		Junling Kong
		Junhui Zhang
		Shuo Zhang
		Jingying Chen
		</p>
	<p>Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often exhibit atypical patterns of visual attention allocation and social-cue processing. Eye-tracking scanpath (ETSP) retains information about fixation points, saccade paths and their temporal changes in the form of images, providing an intuitive and computable data representation for analyzing ASD-related visual attention patterns. However, in ASD auxiliary identification studies, the same participant often generates multiple eye-tracking recordings or multiple visual representation samples. If participant independence is not properly considered during model evaluation, the training and test sets may share individualized eye-movement patterns from the same child. In such cases, the model may learn subject-specific characteristics rather than stable and transferable ASD-related visual attention features, leading to an overestimation of its recognition ability on unseen participants. To address this issue, we propose a Global&amp;amp;ndash;Local Collaborative Fusion Network (GLCF-Net) under a strict participant-independent splitting protocol. Specifically, the proposed method first maps ETSP images into patch token sequences through a shared Patch Embedding layer. A CNN-based local branch is then used to extract local trajectory morphology, path density, and spatial neighborhood structure, while a ViT-based global branch models cross-region gaze transitions and the overall attention distribution. Finally, a gated adaptive fusion module dynamically integrates local and global information to enhance the representation of stable visual attention features. In the primary repeated stratified five-fold participant-level evaluation, averaging the two out-of-fold probabilities for each participant yielded an Accuracy of 87.0% and a ROC-AUC of 93.7%; the original participant split, retained as a secondary analysis, yielded an Accuracy of 83.52% and a ROC-AUC of 90.27%. Under the reported frozen-backbone configurations, the model also showed a balanced pattern across Accuracy, Recall, and F1-score. These results characterize performance for unseen participants within the same dataset and acquisition conditions.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Participant-Independent Classification of Autism-Related Visual Attention Patterns from Eye-Tracking Scanpath Images Using a Global&amp;amp;ndash;Local Fusion Network</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Kun Zhang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Junling Kong</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Junhui Zhang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shuo Zhang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jingying Chen</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040085</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-08-10</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-10</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>85</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040085</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/85</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/84">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 84: Effects of Exhibit Text Presentation Types on Visual Attention Patterns and Cognitive Load in Digital Museums: An Eye-Tracking Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/84</link>
	<description>Exhibit texts are commonly presented as labels or information panels near artworks to provide visitors with direct access to key exhibit information. Digital museums offer flexible and diverse ways to present artworks and communicate their cultural meanings. They also allow exhibit texts to be displayed in different formats, which may shape users&amp;amp;rsquo; reading behavior and cognitive experience. This study used a repeated-measures, within-subject design (N = 38) to compare three types of exhibit text presentation: environment-based, object-based, and user-based. Eye tracking, the NASA Task Load Index, and semi-structured interviews were used to examine the users&amp;amp;rsquo; visual attention patterns and cognitive load. The results showed significant differences in cognitive load across presentation conditions (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.05), with the object-based layout associated with relatively higher cognitive load and more active visual behavior. These findings provide empirical evidence on how exhibit text presentation affects visitors&amp;amp;rsquo; experience in digital museums and offer design implications for textual information in digital reading environments.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-08-03</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 84: Effects of Exhibit Text Presentation Types on Visual Attention Patterns and Cognitive Load in Digital Museums: An Eye-Tracking Study</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/84">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040084</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Yingying Zhu
		Ming Liu
		Yinghuang Luo
		Xuanjia Ren
		Jinho Yim
		</p>
	<p>Exhibit texts are commonly presented as labels or information panels near artworks to provide visitors with direct access to key exhibit information. Digital museums offer flexible and diverse ways to present artworks and communicate their cultural meanings. They also allow exhibit texts to be displayed in different formats, which may shape users&amp;amp;rsquo; reading behavior and cognitive experience. This study used a repeated-measures, within-subject design (N = 38) to compare three types of exhibit text presentation: environment-based, object-based, and user-based. Eye tracking, the NASA Task Load Index, and semi-structured interviews were used to examine the users&amp;amp;rsquo; visual attention patterns and cognitive load. The results showed significant differences in cognitive load across presentation conditions (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.05), with the object-based layout associated with relatively higher cognitive load and more active visual behavior. These findings provide empirical evidence on how exhibit text presentation affects visitors&amp;amp;rsquo; experience in digital museums and offer design implications for textual information in digital reading environments.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Effects of Exhibit Text Presentation Types on Visual Attention Patterns and Cognitive Load in Digital Museums: An Eye-Tracking Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Yingying Zhu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ming Liu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yinghuang Luo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xuanjia Ren</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jinho Yim</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040084</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-08-03</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-03</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>84</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040084</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/84</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/83">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 83: Deaf Child Signers&amp;rsquo; Reading Behaviors Are Predicted by Their Bilingual (Signed and Spoken) Vocabularies: Evidence from Eye-Tracking</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/83</link>
	<description>Deaf children who acquire a signed language at home and at school prior to learning to read are a unique group of developing bilinguals. They are first-language users of a signed language (e.g., American Sign Language; ASL) and second-language users of the written form of the ambient spoken language (e.g., English). Because signed languages do not possess orthographies that are widely used, deaf readers typically read in their second language. This profile stands in contrast to hearing bilingual readers, who read in their first language and, sometimes, their second language. In studies of child readers, vocabulary knowledge is a strong predictor of reading comprehension for both monolinguals and bilinguals. We combine the unique linguistic backgrounds of young signing deaf readers with what is known about vocabulary knowledge and reading, guided by the following research question: Does signed (L1) and spoken (L2) vocabulary knowledge predict reading (eye-gaze) behaviors of deaf children when reading in their L2? We present results from an exploratory pilot eye-tracking study of nine deaf ASL-English bilingual children ages 9&amp;amp;ndash;11, examining whether ASL and English vocabulary knowledge predict different aspects of the reading paradigm. Results suggest that ASL vocabulary predicts where-decisions and measures of oculomotor control such as skipping and regressions, while English vocabulary predicts when-decisions and first-pass durations. We suggest these results from this small-scale study provide initial support for the language interdependence hypothesis because deaf child signers&amp;amp;rsquo; first-language vocabulary knowledge predicts some of the variance in second-language reading performance.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-08-03</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 83: Deaf Child Signers&amp;rsquo; Reading Behaviors Are Predicted by Their Bilingual (Signed and Spoken) Vocabularies: Evidence from Eye-Tracking</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/83">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040083</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Frances G. Cooley
		David Quinto-Pozos
		</p>
	<p>Deaf children who acquire a signed language at home and at school prior to learning to read are a unique group of developing bilinguals. They are first-language users of a signed language (e.g., American Sign Language; ASL) and second-language users of the written form of the ambient spoken language (e.g., English). Because signed languages do not possess orthographies that are widely used, deaf readers typically read in their second language. This profile stands in contrast to hearing bilingual readers, who read in their first language and, sometimes, their second language. In studies of child readers, vocabulary knowledge is a strong predictor of reading comprehension for both monolinguals and bilinguals. We combine the unique linguistic backgrounds of young signing deaf readers with what is known about vocabulary knowledge and reading, guided by the following research question: Does signed (L1) and spoken (L2) vocabulary knowledge predict reading (eye-gaze) behaviors of deaf children when reading in their L2? We present results from an exploratory pilot eye-tracking study of nine deaf ASL-English bilingual children ages 9&amp;amp;ndash;11, examining whether ASL and English vocabulary knowledge predict different aspects of the reading paradigm. Results suggest that ASL vocabulary predicts where-decisions and measures of oculomotor control such as skipping and regressions, while English vocabulary predicts when-decisions and first-pass durations. We suggest these results from this small-scale study provide initial support for the language interdependence hypothesis because deaf child signers&amp;amp;rsquo; first-language vocabulary knowledge predicts some of the variance in second-language reading performance.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Deaf Child Signers&amp;amp;rsquo; Reading Behaviors Are Predicted by Their Bilingual (Signed and Spoken) Vocabularies: Evidence from Eye-Tracking</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Frances G. Cooley</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>David Quinto-Pozos</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040083</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-08-03</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-03</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>83</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040083</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/83</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/82">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 82: Regressive Saccades During Reading: Effects of Target Distance and the Role of Individual Differences in Spatial Memory and Linguistic Skill</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/82</link>
	<description>The current study examined the control of long-range regressive eye movements during sentence reading. Skilled readers were asked to read single-line sentences for comprehension. As a secondary task, they identified a probe word presented to the right of each sentence, and then went back to check the corresponding target word for spelling errors that had been added after reading. The regression target was located either close to or far from the probe. Consistent with prior work, initial regressions were larger for far than for near targets, and the finding of far targets required more eye movements and more search time. We replicated previous descriptions of visuomotor regression strategies but also discovered a novel strategy in which readers frequently send their initial regressions to the center of the line, followed by subsequent saccades. Apparently, this happened primarily when spatial knowledge on saccade target location was lacking. Spatial memory and reading skill made distinct contributions to regression targeting. Memory skills strongly determined primary regressions, especially to near targets, whereas reading speed influenced the time needed to attain targets with subsequent saccades.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-08-03</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 82: Regressive Saccades During Reading: Effects of Target Distance and the Role of Individual Differences in Spatial Memory and Linguistic Skill</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/82">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040082</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Anne Friede
		Christian Vorstius
		Albrecht Inhoff
		Ralph Radach
		</p>
	<p>The current study examined the control of long-range regressive eye movements during sentence reading. Skilled readers were asked to read single-line sentences for comprehension. As a secondary task, they identified a probe word presented to the right of each sentence, and then went back to check the corresponding target word for spelling errors that had been added after reading. The regression target was located either close to or far from the probe. Consistent with prior work, initial regressions were larger for far than for near targets, and the finding of far targets required more eye movements and more search time. We replicated previous descriptions of visuomotor regression strategies but also discovered a novel strategy in which readers frequently send their initial regressions to the center of the line, followed by subsequent saccades. Apparently, this happened primarily when spatial knowledge on saccade target location was lacking. Spatial memory and reading skill made distinct contributions to regression targeting. Memory skills strongly determined primary regressions, especially to near targets, whereas reading speed influenced the time needed to attain targets with subsequent saccades.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Regressive Saccades During Reading: Effects of Target Distance and the Role of Individual Differences in Spatial Memory and Linguistic Skill</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Anne Friede</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Christian Vorstius</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Albrecht Inhoff</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ralph Radach</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040082</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-08-03</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-03</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>82</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040082</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/82</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/81">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 81: Found in Translation: Humor and Style Attributes Unveiled by Horton</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/81</link>
	<description>Background: The popularity of Dr. Seuss books across generations and languages is worthy of introspective analysis in order to establish how well the translation adheres to the original essence that is the underlying reason for its enduring nature. This article analyses Horton Hears a Who! and its Afrikaans translation. Methods: A basic stylistic analysis of Dr. Seuss&amp;amp;rsquo; Horton Hears a Who! was conducted in order to determine whether its rhythmic nature and the meter used in the original text translate well into Afrikaans. Additionally, two extracts were used for an eye-tracking experiment whereby participants were asked to read both so that gaze behavior could be analyzed and compared between Afrikaans and English. Results: Eye-tracking results of both passages reveal that readers are comfortably within typical reading behavior and do not experience difficulty when reading the unique style of Dr. Seuss in either language. Stylistic meter does however change the position of elevated fixation durations, but made-up words and the underlying playful tone do not result in difficulty. However, text characteristics, such as length and number of syllables, and word positions, significantly affect gaze behavior. Conclusions: It is concluded that the very nature of Dr. Seuss books that makes the stories come alive for children over generations is successfully embodied in the Afrikaans translation with respect to the aspects tested and that both the serious, skillful writing and the more frivolous story-telling tone is present in the Afrikaans target text.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-07-24</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 81: Found in Translation: Humor and Style Attributes Unveiled by Horton</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/81">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040081</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Tanya Beelders
		Luna Bergh
		</p>
	<p>Background: The popularity of Dr. Seuss books across generations and languages is worthy of introspective analysis in order to establish how well the translation adheres to the original essence that is the underlying reason for its enduring nature. This article analyses Horton Hears a Who! and its Afrikaans translation. Methods: A basic stylistic analysis of Dr. Seuss&amp;amp;rsquo; Horton Hears a Who! was conducted in order to determine whether its rhythmic nature and the meter used in the original text translate well into Afrikaans. Additionally, two extracts were used for an eye-tracking experiment whereby participants were asked to read both so that gaze behavior could be analyzed and compared between Afrikaans and English. Results: Eye-tracking results of both passages reveal that readers are comfortably within typical reading behavior and do not experience difficulty when reading the unique style of Dr. Seuss in either language. Stylistic meter does however change the position of elevated fixation durations, but made-up words and the underlying playful tone do not result in difficulty. However, text characteristics, such as length and number of syllables, and word positions, significantly affect gaze behavior. Conclusions: It is concluded that the very nature of Dr. Seuss books that makes the stories come alive for children over generations is successfully embodied in the Afrikaans translation with respect to the aspects tested and that both the serious, skillful writing and the more frivolous story-telling tone is present in the Afrikaans target text.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Found in Translation: Humor and Style Attributes Unveiled by Horton</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Tanya Beelders</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Luna Bergh</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040081</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-07-24</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-24</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>81</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040081</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/81</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/80">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 80: Do Two Eyes Identify Better than One? Interpretable Binocular Dynamics for Virtual Reality Gaze Biometrics</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/80</link>
	<description>Virtual reality (VR) headsets with built-in eye trackers can record binocular gaze, but prior biometric studies have largely emphasized monocular gaze or general spatial trajectories, leaving the identity value of interocular coordination largely untested. We test whether that geometry provides identity information beyond monocular gaze dynamics. Using the GazeBaseVR dataset, we derive disparity, vergence-dynamic, and fixation disparity features and evaluate them in cross-session identification, task transfer, sequence modeling, replay detection, and return-visit analyses. Adding binocular features to monocular features improves cross-session Rank-1 identification, while binocular features alone provide complementary but limited discrimination. Performance is strongest when enrollment and probe tasks match and weakens sharply across tasks. Per-recording disparity centering leaves much of the binocular-only result intact, and a matched-input temporal convolutional network (TCN) performs better with binocular input than with duplicated monocular input. The TCN embedding overlaps with the disparity and vergence features, and simple feature-level fusion does not improve Rank-1 performance. Left-right gaze consistency can reject simple monocular replay attempts in this constrained setting, but score query adaptation reduces detection performance. In this setting, binocular dynamics are best treated as auxiliary evidence for VR gaze biometrics rather than as a standalone authenticator.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-07-22</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 80: Do Two Eyes Identify Better than One? Interpretable Binocular Dynamics for Virtual Reality Gaze Biometrics</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/80">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040080</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Yiyu Zhang
		Huijun Tang
		Xiajing Yao
		</p>
	<p>Virtual reality (VR) headsets with built-in eye trackers can record binocular gaze, but prior biometric studies have largely emphasized monocular gaze or general spatial trajectories, leaving the identity value of interocular coordination largely untested. We test whether that geometry provides identity information beyond monocular gaze dynamics. Using the GazeBaseVR dataset, we derive disparity, vergence-dynamic, and fixation disparity features and evaluate them in cross-session identification, task transfer, sequence modeling, replay detection, and return-visit analyses. Adding binocular features to monocular features improves cross-session Rank-1 identification, while binocular features alone provide complementary but limited discrimination. Performance is strongest when enrollment and probe tasks match and weakens sharply across tasks. Per-recording disparity centering leaves much of the binocular-only result intact, and a matched-input temporal convolutional network (TCN) performs better with binocular input than with duplicated monocular input. The TCN embedding overlaps with the disparity and vergence features, and simple feature-level fusion does not improve Rank-1 performance. Left-right gaze consistency can reject simple monocular replay attempts in this constrained setting, but score query adaptation reduces detection performance. In this setting, binocular dynamics are best treated as auxiliary evidence for VR gaze biometrics rather than as a standalone authenticator.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Do Two Eyes Identify Better than One? Interpretable Binocular Dynamics for Virtual Reality Gaze Biometrics</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Yiyu Zhang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Huijun Tang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xiajing Yao</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040080</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-07-22</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-22</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>80</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040080</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/80</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/79">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 79: The Relationship Between Gaze and Classroom Conversation in Primary Education in Chile: A Comparison by Sex and Urban–Rural Context</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/79</link>
	<description>This study analyzes the relationship between verbal interaction and eye behavior among 112 primary school students in urban and rural classrooms in Chile, using wireless eye-tracking technology. The results reveal statistically significant differences based on socioeducational context and sex. Linear regression analyses show that gaze is a significantly more robust predictor of class participation in rural contexts (R2 adjusted = 0.671) than in urban contexts (R2 adjusted = 0.342). Furthermore, eye behavior explained 71% of the variance in male students, compared to 37.7% in female students. While female students focused their attention primarily on teachers, male students relied on a shared visual distribution between the teacher and peers to regulate their participation in class. In conclusion, the gaze acts as a differentiated scaffolding whose importance intensifies in boys and rural environments. These findings suggest distinct maturational trajectories that require teachers to implement visually intentional instructional strategies to ensure communicative efficiency in the classroom.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-07-17</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 79: The Relationship Between Gaze and Classroom Conversation in Primary Education in Chile: A Comparison by Sex and Urban–Rural Context</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/79">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040079</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Marco Villalta-Paucar
		Jéssica Rebolledo-Etchepare
		Lautaro Barriga-Carvajal
		</p>
	<p>This study analyzes the relationship between verbal interaction and eye behavior among 112 primary school students in urban and rural classrooms in Chile, using wireless eye-tracking technology. The results reveal statistically significant differences based on socioeducational context and sex. Linear regression analyses show that gaze is a significantly more robust predictor of class participation in rural contexts (R2 adjusted = 0.671) than in urban contexts (R2 adjusted = 0.342). Furthermore, eye behavior explained 71% of the variance in male students, compared to 37.7% in female students. While female students focused their attention primarily on teachers, male students relied on a shared visual distribution between the teacher and peers to regulate their participation in class. In conclusion, the gaze acts as a differentiated scaffolding whose importance intensifies in boys and rural environments. These findings suggest distinct maturational trajectories that require teachers to implement visually intentional instructional strategies to ensure communicative efficiency in the classroom.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>The Relationship Between Gaze and Classroom Conversation in Primary Education in Chile: A Comparison by Sex and Urban–Rural Context</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Marco Villalta-Paucar</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jéssica Rebolledo-Etchepare</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lautaro Barriga-Carvajal</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040079</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-07-17</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>79</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040079</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/79</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/78">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 78: Antisaccade Performance in Adolescent Obsessive&amp;ndash;Compulsive Disorder: Evidence from a Familial-Risk Design</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/78</link>
	<description>This study aimed to compare antisaccade performance among adolescents with obsessive&amp;amp;ndash;compulsive disorder (OCD), their unaffected siblings, and healthy controls, and to examine whether this performance may serve as a candidate familial-risk marker for OCD. The study included 48 adolescents aged 12&amp;amp;ndash;18 years with OCD, 35 unaffected siblings, and 39 healthy controls. Participants completed an antisaccade task using an eye-tracking device. Antisaccade correct response rate and latency were evaluated as the primary outcomes, whereas saccadic velocity was examined as an exploratory measure of oculomotor execution. The OCD group showed lower antisaccade correct response rate and longer latency compared with healthy controls, whereas the sibling group demonstrated intermediate performance. Exploratory analyses identified statistically significant group differences in mean saccadic velocity; however, this finding should be interpreted cautiously. Regression analyses indicated that both OCD diagnosis and sibling status were independently associated with antisaccade correct response rate and latency, whereas findings for saccadic velocity should be considered exploratory. These findings suggest that impairments in antisaccade performance may not be specific to OCD but may also be present, albeit to a milder extent, in unaffected siblings, providing preliminary evidence supporting antisaccade performance as a candidate familial-risk marker for OCD that warrants further investigation within an endophenotype framework.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-07-15</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 78: Antisaccade Performance in Adolescent Obsessive&amp;ndash;Compulsive Disorder: Evidence from a Familial-Risk Design</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/78">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040078</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Oguz Bilal Karakus
		Ayse Akca
		Muhammed Said Demirkan
		Zeynep Ahsen Ozcan
		Didem Cek Ozturk
		Ilayda Barankoglu Sevin
		Sumeyra Karakus
		Ibrahim Selcuk Esin
		Onur Burak Dursun
		</p>
	<p>This study aimed to compare antisaccade performance among adolescents with obsessive&amp;amp;ndash;compulsive disorder (OCD), their unaffected siblings, and healthy controls, and to examine whether this performance may serve as a candidate familial-risk marker for OCD. The study included 48 adolescents aged 12&amp;amp;ndash;18 years with OCD, 35 unaffected siblings, and 39 healthy controls. Participants completed an antisaccade task using an eye-tracking device. Antisaccade correct response rate and latency were evaluated as the primary outcomes, whereas saccadic velocity was examined as an exploratory measure of oculomotor execution. The OCD group showed lower antisaccade correct response rate and longer latency compared with healthy controls, whereas the sibling group demonstrated intermediate performance. Exploratory analyses identified statistically significant group differences in mean saccadic velocity; however, this finding should be interpreted cautiously. Regression analyses indicated that both OCD diagnosis and sibling status were independently associated with antisaccade correct response rate and latency, whereas findings for saccadic velocity should be considered exploratory. These findings suggest that impairments in antisaccade performance may not be specific to OCD but may also be present, albeit to a milder extent, in unaffected siblings, providing preliminary evidence supporting antisaccade performance as a candidate familial-risk marker for OCD that warrants further investigation within an endophenotype framework.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Antisaccade Performance in Adolescent Obsessive&amp;amp;ndash;Compulsive Disorder: Evidence from a Familial-Risk Design</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Oguz Bilal Karakus</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ayse Akca</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Muhammed Said Demirkan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zeynep Ahsen Ozcan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Didem Cek Ozturk</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ilayda Barankoglu Sevin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sumeyra Karakus</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ibrahim Selcuk Esin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Onur Burak Dursun</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040078</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-07-15</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-15</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>78</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040078</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/78</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/77">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 77: Influence of Sleep Monitoring Terminal Displays-Related Factors on User Visual Perception via Eye-Tracking and Tasks</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/77</link>
	<description>The sleep monitoring terminal display (SMTD) designated for sleep cabins provides data visualizations of sleep profiles, yet poses challenges concerning visually informed interfaces. Given the scarcity of research on the SMTD interface, this study aims to evaluate the influence of SMTD-related factors, including stimulus areas of interest (AOIs), user experiences and tasks, on user visual perceptions while interacting with the SMTD system. Eye-tracking experimental contexts drawn from authentic settings are used to examine how the SMTD interfaces affect visual perceptions under varying tasks. Forty valid samples were collected, and pupil sizes (PSs), task performances, satisfaction, and usability were statistically compared and evaluated. The findings indicated that tasks had no significant effects, but user experiences and stimuli AOIs had significant main effects on PSs. In addition, task completion time ratio and tracking ratio between the two tasks varied; physical demand exceeded mental demand in task 1, whereas it was the opposite in task 2. The effectiveness of post-optimized interfaces was additionally substantiated through combining subjective ratings and objective metrics. The SMTD study provides novel insights for digital interface development and helps enhance users’ integrated visual perception.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-07-14</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 77: Influence of Sleep Monitoring Terminal Displays-Related Factors on User Visual Perception via Eye-Tracking and Tasks</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/77">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040077</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Jianghao Xiao
		Jinyi Zhi
		Shiyu Dong
		Yao Zhou
		Yao Xiao
		Dengkai Chen
		</p>
	<p>The sleep monitoring terminal display (SMTD) designated for sleep cabins provides data visualizations of sleep profiles, yet poses challenges concerning visually informed interfaces. Given the scarcity of research on the SMTD interface, this study aims to evaluate the influence of SMTD-related factors, including stimulus areas of interest (AOIs), user experiences and tasks, on user visual perceptions while interacting with the SMTD system. Eye-tracking experimental contexts drawn from authentic settings are used to examine how the SMTD interfaces affect visual perceptions under varying tasks. Forty valid samples were collected, and pupil sizes (PSs), task performances, satisfaction, and usability were statistically compared and evaluated. The findings indicated that tasks had no significant effects, but user experiences and stimuli AOIs had significant main effects on PSs. In addition, task completion time ratio and tracking ratio between the two tasks varied; physical demand exceeded mental demand in task 1, whereas it was the opposite in task 2. The effectiveness of post-optimized interfaces was additionally substantiated through combining subjective ratings and objective metrics. The SMTD study provides novel insights for digital interface development and helps enhance users’ integrated visual perception.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Influence of Sleep Monitoring Terminal Displays-Related Factors on User Visual Perception via Eye-Tracking and Tasks</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Jianghao Xiao</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jinyi Zhi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shiyu Dong</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yao Zhou</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yao Xiao</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Dengkai Chen</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040077</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-07-14</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>77</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040077</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/77</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/76">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 76: gp3tools: An R Package for Reproducible Analysis and Reporting of Gazepoint GP3 Eye-Tracking Exports</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/76</link>
	<description>Reproducible eye-movement research requires a documented path from device exports to structured, quality-checked, and reportable data objects. Gazepoint GP3 and Gazepoint Analysis provide accessible gaze, fixation, pupil, timing, media, and area-of-interest data, but their folder-based CSV exports are not automatically analysis-ready. Existing R tools support important stages of eye-tracking and pupillometry analysis, but they generally assume that data have already been organised into suitable structures; they do not provide a Gazepoint-aware workflow beginning with export-folder checks, all-gaze/fixation pairing, sampling and tracking-quality diagnostics, and preservation of preprocessing decisions through reporting. This article presents gp3tools, an open-source R package (R version 4.6.1) that converts Gazepoint GP3/Gazepoint Analysis exports into structured R objects, diagnostic summaries, preprocessing outputs, model-ready tables, interoperability objects, and reproducible reports. Rather than introducing a new statistical estimator, the package provides an export-aware workflow scaffold for import checking, quality control, pupil preprocessing, area-of-interest, fixation and transition summaries, model preparation, interoperability, and reporting. A synthetic Gazepoint-style demonstration dataset was used to evaluate workflow execution without exposing private participant data. The demonstration identified all expected file pairs and produced sample-level gaze/pupil tables, fixation tables, sampling-quality summaries, area-of-interest summaries, review flags, and reporting outputs. A small, private real-export compatibility check further showed that the workflow could process one empirical Gazepoint folder without manual restructuring. These results support a bounded software-evaluation claim: gp3tools executes the tested Gazepoint-style workflow and returns expected diagnostic and reporting objects, but the evidence does not establish hardware accuracy, preprocessing accuracy, computational scalability, general robustness across all Gazepoint exports, or substantive psychological or perceptual effects.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-07-14</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 76: gp3tools: An R Package for Reproducible Analysis and Reporting of Gazepoint GP3 Eye-Tracking Exports</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/76">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040076</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Stefanos Balaskas
		</p>
	<p>Reproducible eye-movement research requires a documented path from device exports to structured, quality-checked, and reportable data objects. Gazepoint GP3 and Gazepoint Analysis provide accessible gaze, fixation, pupil, timing, media, and area-of-interest data, but their folder-based CSV exports are not automatically analysis-ready. Existing R tools support important stages of eye-tracking and pupillometry analysis, but they generally assume that data have already been organised into suitable structures; they do not provide a Gazepoint-aware workflow beginning with export-folder checks, all-gaze/fixation pairing, sampling and tracking-quality diagnostics, and preservation of preprocessing decisions through reporting. This article presents gp3tools, an open-source R package (R version 4.6.1) that converts Gazepoint GP3/Gazepoint Analysis exports into structured R objects, diagnostic summaries, preprocessing outputs, model-ready tables, interoperability objects, and reproducible reports. Rather than introducing a new statistical estimator, the package provides an export-aware workflow scaffold for import checking, quality control, pupil preprocessing, area-of-interest, fixation and transition summaries, model preparation, interoperability, and reporting. A synthetic Gazepoint-style demonstration dataset was used to evaluate workflow execution without exposing private participant data. The demonstration identified all expected file pairs and produced sample-level gaze/pupil tables, fixation tables, sampling-quality summaries, area-of-interest summaries, review flags, and reporting outputs. A small, private real-export compatibility check further showed that the workflow could process one empirical Gazepoint folder without manual restructuring. These results support a bounded software-evaluation claim: gp3tools executes the tested Gazepoint-style workflow and returns expected diagnostic and reporting objects, but the evidence does not establish hardware accuracy, preprocessing accuracy, computational scalability, general robustness across all Gazepoint exports, or substantive psychological or perceptual effects.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>gp3tools: An R Package for Reproducible Analysis and Reporting of Gazepoint GP3 Eye-Tracking Exports</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Stefanos Balaskas</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040076</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-07-14</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>76</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040076</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/76</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/75">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 75: Structural Coupling Between Shannon Entropy and Dwell-Time Entropy Across Emotional and Safety-Critical Visual Tasks</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/75</link>
	<description>This study investigated the relationship between fixation-frequency-based Shannon entropy and dwell-time-based entropy across two different visual task domains: emotional evaluation of automotive exterior designs and safety-critical monitoring of nuclear power plant emergency scenarios. Although gaze entropy has been widely used to explain emotional responses, task performance, and situation awareness, the relationship between entropy measures derived from fixation counts and fixation durations remains insufficiently examined. Eye-tracking data were analyzed from two experiments with different attentional characteristics. In the emotional visual task, 10 participants evaluated three automotive design images. In the safety-critical task, 20 participants performed four nuclear power plant emergency monitoring scenarios. Shannon entropy and dwell-time entropy were calculated using fixation count and fixation duration distributions across Areas of Interest, respectively. Pearson correlation and simple regression analyses were conducted within each task domain. The results showed strong positive associations between Shannon entropy and dwell-time entropy in both domains. The emotional task showed a correlation of r = 0.844, while the safety-critical task showed a correlation of r = 0.890. These findings suggest that fixation-frequency-based and dwell-time-based entropy measures exhibit substantial overlap across different visual task contexts. However, the observed associations may partly reflect mathematical dependency between fixation frequency and cumulative dwell-time, and the findings should be interpreted as exploratory evidence rather than proof of metric interchangeability. The study highlights that gaze entropy metrics should be interpreted in relation to task-dependent attentional contexts. Higher entropy may be associated with exploratory visual attention in emotional evaluation, whereas lower entropy may be associated with focused monitoring in safety-critical tasks.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-07-09</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 75: Structural Coupling Between Shannon Entropy and Dwell-Time Entropy Across Emotional and Safety-Critical Visual Tasks</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/75">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040075</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Yejin Lee
		Kwangtae Jung
		</p>
	<p>This study investigated the relationship between fixation-frequency-based Shannon entropy and dwell-time-based entropy across two different visual task domains: emotional evaluation of automotive exterior designs and safety-critical monitoring of nuclear power plant emergency scenarios. Although gaze entropy has been widely used to explain emotional responses, task performance, and situation awareness, the relationship between entropy measures derived from fixation counts and fixation durations remains insufficiently examined. Eye-tracking data were analyzed from two experiments with different attentional characteristics. In the emotional visual task, 10 participants evaluated three automotive design images. In the safety-critical task, 20 participants performed four nuclear power plant emergency monitoring scenarios. Shannon entropy and dwell-time entropy were calculated using fixation count and fixation duration distributions across Areas of Interest, respectively. Pearson correlation and simple regression analyses were conducted within each task domain. The results showed strong positive associations between Shannon entropy and dwell-time entropy in both domains. The emotional task showed a correlation of r = 0.844, while the safety-critical task showed a correlation of r = 0.890. These findings suggest that fixation-frequency-based and dwell-time-based entropy measures exhibit substantial overlap across different visual task contexts. However, the observed associations may partly reflect mathematical dependency between fixation frequency and cumulative dwell-time, and the findings should be interpreted as exploratory evidence rather than proof of metric interchangeability. The study highlights that gaze entropy metrics should be interpreted in relation to task-dependent attentional contexts. Higher entropy may be associated with exploratory visual attention in emotional evaluation, whereas lower entropy may be associated with focused monitoring in safety-critical tasks.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Structural Coupling Between Shannon Entropy and Dwell-Time Entropy Across Emotional and Safety-Critical Visual Tasks</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Yejin Lee</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kwangtae Jung</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040075</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-07-09</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-09</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>75</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040075</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/75</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/74">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 74: Eye-Movement-Assisted Time–Frequency EEG Decoding for Multimodal Robotic Arm Control</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/74</link>
	<description>Brain–computer interface (BCI) technology has shown potential for future rehabilitation-related and assistive control applications. Nevertheless, single-modality electroencephalography-based motor imagery (EEG-MI) signals are susceptible to interference, whereas existing algorithmic models suffer from limited classification accuracy and insufficient actionable control commands for interactive devices, thereby impeding their practical deployment. To tackle these limitations, this study presents a multimodal human–computer interaction control scheme that integrates eye-movement command encoding with EEG motor imagery decoding. Self-collected EEG-MI and eye-movement datasets were established to support the proposed multimodal control framework. In this framework, eye movements are not used merely as auxiliary inputs, but are encoded as discrete commands for start, stop, grasp, and release, thereby reducing the command burden of EEG-MI decoding. The EEG-TransNet model is enhanced by integrating a time–frequency feature branch and replacing the original convolutional encoder with an adaptive multi-branch EEG feature gating module, strengthening the representation and fusion of multi-domain features. The model yields average classification accuracies of 86.96% and 88.73% on the BCI IV-2a dataset and the self-collected EEG dataset, respectively. Four independent SVM binary classifiers are adopted to identify four eye movement patterns. The EEG and eye movement classification results are binary-encoded to generate hardware-compatible control commands. Robotic-arm grasping experiments with healthy trained participants showed an average task completion time of 17 s, and the repeated grasping success-rate results further provide preliminary evidence for the real-time feasibility of the multimodal control framework under controlled laboratory conditions.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-07-07</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 74: Eye-Movement-Assisted Time–Frequency EEG Decoding for Multimodal Robotic Arm Control</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/74">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040074</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Xiangyang Sun
		Wenjun Zhang
		Jiahua Wu
		Xingwei Xiong
		Haixia Mei
		</p>
	<p>Brain–computer interface (BCI) technology has shown potential for future rehabilitation-related and assistive control applications. Nevertheless, single-modality electroencephalography-based motor imagery (EEG-MI) signals are susceptible to interference, whereas existing algorithmic models suffer from limited classification accuracy and insufficient actionable control commands for interactive devices, thereby impeding their practical deployment. To tackle these limitations, this study presents a multimodal human–computer interaction control scheme that integrates eye-movement command encoding with EEG motor imagery decoding. Self-collected EEG-MI and eye-movement datasets were established to support the proposed multimodal control framework. In this framework, eye movements are not used merely as auxiliary inputs, but are encoded as discrete commands for start, stop, grasp, and release, thereby reducing the command burden of EEG-MI decoding. The EEG-TransNet model is enhanced by integrating a time–frequency feature branch and replacing the original convolutional encoder with an adaptive multi-branch EEG feature gating module, strengthening the representation and fusion of multi-domain features. The model yields average classification accuracies of 86.96% and 88.73% on the BCI IV-2a dataset and the self-collected EEG dataset, respectively. Four independent SVM binary classifiers are adopted to identify four eye movement patterns. The EEG and eye movement classification results are binary-encoded to generate hardware-compatible control commands. Robotic-arm grasping experiments with healthy trained participants showed an average task completion time of 17 s, and the repeated grasping success-rate results further provide preliminary evidence for the real-time feasibility of the multimodal control framework under controlled laboratory conditions.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Eye-Movement-Assisted Time–Frequency EEG Decoding for Multimodal Robotic Arm Control</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Xiangyang Sun</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Wenjun Zhang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jiahua Wu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xingwei Xiong</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Haixia Mei</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040074</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-07-07</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>74</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040074</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/74</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/73">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 73: Effects of Pictogram and Typeface Complexity on Visual Attention: Eye-Tracking Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/73</link>
	<description>This study investigated how congruence between pictogram complexity and typographic complexity influences visual processing and perceived appropriateness in multimodal communication. Drawing on theories of visual communication, legibility and aesthetic perception, the study examined whether simple or complex pictograms harmonise more effectively with sans-serif or serif typefaces. Ninety participants viewed stimuli from three thematic categories (cobbler, herbal pharmacy and gluten-free restaurant), while their eye movements were recorded using a Tobii Pro Fusion eye-tracking device. Measures included reading time, fixation count and saccade count, together with subjective evaluations of pictogram&amp;amp;ndash;typeface suitability. The results show that reading time was the most sensitive indicator of formal congruence. In the cobbler and gluten-free restaurant categories, simple pictograms increased reading time with sans-serif typography but decreased it with serif typography. In the herbal pharmacy category, simple pictograms and sans-serif typography independently supported faster reading performance. Subjective evaluations showed no significant differences between combinations, indicating that participants perceived all pairings as similarly appropriate despite measurable differences in processing efficiency. The findings suggest that the effectiveness of pictogram&amp;amp;ndash;typeface combinations depends on both formal complexity and thematic context. Eye-tracking proved valuable for revealing subtle cognitive processing differences not reflected in subjective judgements.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-07-07</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 73: Effects of Pictogram and Typeface Complexity on Visual Attention: Eye-Tracking Study</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/73">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040073</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Klementina Možina
		Dorotea Kovačević
		Petra Buljat
		Iva Šarčević
		Barbara Blaznik
		Tanja Medved
		Maja Brozović
		</p>
	<p>This study investigated how congruence between pictogram complexity and typographic complexity influences visual processing and perceived appropriateness in multimodal communication. Drawing on theories of visual communication, legibility and aesthetic perception, the study examined whether simple or complex pictograms harmonise more effectively with sans-serif or serif typefaces. Ninety participants viewed stimuli from three thematic categories (cobbler, herbal pharmacy and gluten-free restaurant), while their eye movements were recorded using a Tobii Pro Fusion eye-tracking device. Measures included reading time, fixation count and saccade count, together with subjective evaluations of pictogram&amp;amp;ndash;typeface suitability. The results show that reading time was the most sensitive indicator of formal congruence. In the cobbler and gluten-free restaurant categories, simple pictograms increased reading time with sans-serif typography but decreased it with serif typography. In the herbal pharmacy category, simple pictograms and sans-serif typography independently supported faster reading performance. Subjective evaluations showed no significant differences between combinations, indicating that participants perceived all pairings as similarly appropriate despite measurable differences in processing efficiency. The findings suggest that the effectiveness of pictogram&amp;amp;ndash;typeface combinations depends on both formal complexity and thematic context. Eye-tracking proved valuable for revealing subtle cognitive processing differences not reflected in subjective judgements.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Effects of Pictogram and Typeface Complexity on Visual Attention: Eye-Tracking Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Klementina Možina</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Dorotea Kovačević</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Petra Buljat</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Iva Šarčević</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Barbara Blaznik</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tanja Medved</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Maja Brozović</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040073</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-07-07</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>73</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040073</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/73</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/72">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 72: Physiological Signatures of Emotional Processing via Pupil Diameter, Galvanic Skin Response, and Gaze Behavior: A Pilot Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/72</link>
	<description>Background: This pilot study investigated the effects of emotional images on gaze behavior, pupil diameter, and galvanic skin response (GSR). After measuring trait anxiety, 37 healthy adults were shown images (disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, or neutral) from the International Affective Picture System for 4 s each while recording eye tracking and physiological responses. Methods: Recorded data included total fixation duration, average fixation duration, fixation count, first fixation duration, mean pupil diameter during fixation, and average GSR. Results: Compared to images depicting happiness, those depicting fear were associated with longer average fixation duration, fewer fixations, and larger pupil diameters. Compared with neutral images, those showing happiness were associated with larger pupil diameters. No significant differences in GSR were observed across emotion categories. Regarding anxiety levels, fear-inducing images tended to be associated with fewer fixations and larger pupil diameters across all anxiety groups. In moderate- and high-anxiety groups, there was a tendency for longer fixation duration compared to images evoking happiness. Conclusions: Overall, these preliminary findings suggest that while individuals tend to fixate on fear images less often than on happiness images, they fixate for longer on them, which may cause pupil dilation. However, no significant response was observed depending on the level of trait anxiety. Further research using a larger sample size is needed to confirm these initial observations.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-07-07</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 72: Physiological Signatures of Emotional Processing via Pupil Diameter, Galvanic Skin Response, and Gaze Behavior: A Pilot Study</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/72">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040072</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Miwa Horiuchi-Hirose
		</p>
	<p>Background: This pilot study investigated the effects of emotional images on gaze behavior, pupil diameter, and galvanic skin response (GSR). After measuring trait anxiety, 37 healthy adults were shown images (disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, or neutral) from the International Affective Picture System for 4 s each while recording eye tracking and physiological responses. Methods: Recorded data included total fixation duration, average fixation duration, fixation count, first fixation duration, mean pupil diameter during fixation, and average GSR. Results: Compared to images depicting happiness, those depicting fear were associated with longer average fixation duration, fewer fixations, and larger pupil diameters. Compared with neutral images, those showing happiness were associated with larger pupil diameters. No significant differences in GSR were observed across emotion categories. Regarding anxiety levels, fear-inducing images tended to be associated with fewer fixations and larger pupil diameters across all anxiety groups. In moderate- and high-anxiety groups, there was a tendency for longer fixation duration compared to images evoking happiness. Conclusions: Overall, these preliminary findings suggest that while individuals tend to fixate on fear images less often than on happiness images, they fixate for longer on them, which may cause pupil dilation. However, no significant response was observed depending on the level of trait anxiety. Further research using a larger sample size is needed to confirm these initial observations.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Physiological Signatures of Emotional Processing via Pupil Diameter, Galvanic Skin Response, and Gaze Behavior: A Pilot Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Miwa Horiuchi-Hirose</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040072</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-07-07</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>72</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040072</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/72</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/71">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 71: Autoimmune Diseases and the Vestibular and Oculomotor System: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/71</link>
	<description>Vertigo, dizziness, and oculomotor disturbances may occur as manifestations of immune-mediated disorders affecting the inner ear, central vestibular pathways, or multisystem autoimmune disease. Although uncommon, these conditions are clinically important because delayed recognition may lead to irreversible hearing loss, vestibular dysfunction, or neurological disability. This review summarizes the clinical presentation, diagnostic approach, and treatment of immune-mediated vestibular and oculomotor disorders. We suggest a practical classification into isolated immune-mediated inner ear disease, systemic autoimmune disorders with audio-vestibular involvement, and autoimmune disorders of the central or peripheral nervous system affecting balance and eye movements. Red flags for such conditions include bilateral or progressive symptoms, fluctuating audio-vestibular deficits, associated neurological signs, and accompanied autoimmune disease. Corticosteroids remain the main first-line treatment in many of these disorders, mainly due to missing data from controlled trials. Steroid-sparing immunosuppressants, biologics, and tumor-directed therapies are effective in many cases; however, because of the missing data, they are only used in selected entities without any other choice. A structured neuro-otological and immunological workup is essential to improve diagnostic accuracy and enable timely therapy.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-07-02</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 71: Autoimmune Diseases and the Vestibular and Oculomotor System: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/71">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040071</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Felix K. Schwarz
		Gerald Wiest
		Paulus Rommer
		</p>
	<p>Vertigo, dizziness, and oculomotor disturbances may occur as manifestations of immune-mediated disorders affecting the inner ear, central vestibular pathways, or multisystem autoimmune disease. Although uncommon, these conditions are clinically important because delayed recognition may lead to irreversible hearing loss, vestibular dysfunction, or neurological disability. This review summarizes the clinical presentation, diagnostic approach, and treatment of immune-mediated vestibular and oculomotor disorders. We suggest a practical classification into isolated immune-mediated inner ear disease, systemic autoimmune disorders with audio-vestibular involvement, and autoimmune disorders of the central or peripheral nervous system affecting balance and eye movements. Red flags for such conditions include bilateral or progressive symptoms, fluctuating audio-vestibular deficits, associated neurological signs, and accompanied autoimmune disease. Corticosteroids remain the main first-line treatment in many of these disorders, mainly due to missing data from controlled trials. Steroid-sparing immunosuppressants, biologics, and tumor-directed therapies are effective in many cases; however, because of the missing data, they are only used in selected entities without any other choice. A structured neuro-otological and immunological workup is essential to improve diagnostic accuracy and enable timely therapy.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Autoimmune Diseases and the Vestibular and Oculomotor System: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Felix K. Schwarz</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gerald Wiest</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Paulus Rommer</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040071</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-07-02</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-02</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>71</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040071</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/71</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/70">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 70: Rehabilitation Oculomotor Screening Evaluation in Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/70</link>
	<description>Background: Many individuals with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) exhibit oculomotor dysfunctions that impact their daily functioning. As current clinical screening tools are limited, we have created and pilot-tested the Rehabilitation Oculomotor Screening Evaluation (ROSE) previously in a small sample of people with acquired brain injuries and neurotypical participants. The current study aims to validate ROSE in persons with TBI, focusing on mild TBI (mTBI). Methods: Participants with TBI (n = 25) completed different clinical scales, including ROSE, Sensory Organization Test (SOT) for standing balance, Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI), Timed Up and Go (TUG) for mobility, and a visual analogue scale for the subjective perception of visual vertigo. Neurotypical individuals (n = 24) who were age- and sex-matched completed only ROSE. Results: The group with mTBI (n = 18) had significantly higher ROSE scores compared to the neurotypical group, with a large effect size. Significant correlation was found between ROSE and RNLI scores, but not with other clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Significant between-group difference in ROSE scores and their association with RNLI scores suggest that ROSE is a valid tool in detecting oculomotor dysfunction in TBI. Future studies should continue the validation of ROSE in other TBI and neurologic populations and in larger sample sizes.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-07-02</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 70: Rehabilitation Oculomotor Screening Evaluation in Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/70">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040070</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Aimy Vadeboncoeur
		Chelsey Kwan
		Ada Mocanu
		Sarah Schipper
		Olivia Taylor
		Elizabeth Dannenbaum
		Joyce Fung
		</p>
	<p>Background: Many individuals with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) exhibit oculomotor dysfunctions that impact their daily functioning. As current clinical screening tools are limited, we have created and pilot-tested the Rehabilitation Oculomotor Screening Evaluation (ROSE) previously in a small sample of people with acquired brain injuries and neurotypical participants. The current study aims to validate ROSE in persons with TBI, focusing on mild TBI (mTBI). Methods: Participants with TBI (n = 25) completed different clinical scales, including ROSE, Sensory Organization Test (SOT) for standing balance, Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI), Timed Up and Go (TUG) for mobility, and a visual analogue scale for the subjective perception of visual vertigo. Neurotypical individuals (n = 24) who were age- and sex-matched completed only ROSE. Results: The group with mTBI (n = 18) had significantly higher ROSE scores compared to the neurotypical group, with a large effect size. Significant correlation was found between ROSE and RNLI scores, but not with other clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Significant between-group difference in ROSE scores and their association with RNLI scores suggest that ROSE is a valid tool in detecting oculomotor dysfunction in TBI. Future studies should continue the validation of ROSE in other TBI and neurologic populations and in larger sample sizes.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Rehabilitation Oculomotor Screening Evaluation in Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Aimy Vadeboncoeur</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Chelsey Kwan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ada Mocanu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sarah Schipper</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Olivia Taylor</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Elizabeth Dannenbaum</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Joyce Fung</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040070</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-07-02</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-02</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>70</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040070</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/70</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/69">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 69: Phase-Sensitive Gaze Allocation in a Progressive Calligraphy Task</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/69</link>
	<description>Eye-movement studies of manual production often average gaze across an entire trial, obscuring how visual information use changes once actions begin. We separated the pre-writing and writing phases in a fixed progressive Chinese calligraphy task. Thirty-seven postgraduate students completed two style-guided transfer (SGT) pages, a worked example, and two evolution-based mapping (EBM) pages; 34 contributed usable gaze data. On SGT pages, reference allocation fell from 0.626 before writing to 0.131 during writing, whereas the share of reference viewing directed to diagnostic tokens rose from 0.473 to 0.601. On EBM pages, allocation to the cue-plus-context display fell from 0.825 to 0.447 after pen onset but remained substantial; cue share and context coverage also declined. Participant-level process blocks did not improve quality models. In exploratory page-level EBM analyses, greater pre-writing context coverage was associated with higher product quality. These findings identify pen onset as a useful boundary for analyzing visual information use in constrained production: external sampling is greatest before writing, and task-specific re-access persists during execution. Because the task order was fixed, page-family differences cannot be separated from practice or scaffolding. Phase-specific area-of-interest measures can therefore add process information to product scores without treating gaze as a direct measure of cognition.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-06-30</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 69: Phase-Sensitive Gaze Allocation in a Progressive Calligraphy Task</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/69">doi: 10.3390/jemr19040069</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Yujun Liu
		Nina Xie
		Xutang Tong
		Yuanyuan Wang
		</p>
	<p>Eye-movement studies of manual production often average gaze across an entire trial, obscuring how visual information use changes once actions begin. We separated the pre-writing and writing phases in a fixed progressive Chinese calligraphy task. Thirty-seven postgraduate students completed two style-guided transfer (SGT) pages, a worked example, and two evolution-based mapping (EBM) pages; 34 contributed usable gaze data. On SGT pages, reference allocation fell from 0.626 before writing to 0.131 during writing, whereas the share of reference viewing directed to diagnostic tokens rose from 0.473 to 0.601. On EBM pages, allocation to the cue-plus-context display fell from 0.825 to 0.447 after pen onset but remained substantial; cue share and context coverage also declined. Participant-level process blocks did not improve quality models. In exploratory page-level EBM analyses, greater pre-writing context coverage was associated with higher product quality. These findings identify pen onset as a useful boundary for analyzing visual information use in constrained production: external sampling is greatest before writing, and task-specific re-access persists during execution. Because the task order was fixed, page-family differences cannot be separated from practice or scaffolding. Phase-specific area-of-interest measures can therefore add process information to product scores without treating gaze as a direct measure of cognition.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Phase-Sensitive Gaze Allocation in a Progressive Calligraphy Task</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Yujun Liu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nina Xie</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xutang Tong</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yuanyuan Wang</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19040069</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-06-30</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>69</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19040069</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/4/69</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/68">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 68: Effects of Surface Texture and Color on the Visuo-Tactile Perception of Polyurethane Synthetic Leather for Automotive Seats</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/68</link>
	<description>Polyurethane synthetic leather is a widely used covering material in automotive interiors, and its surface coating characteristics directly determine the occupant experience. However, the underlying mechanisms by which these characteristics influence visuo-tactile perception in the context of new energy vehicles (NEVs) require further investigation. In this study, a composite experimental matrix was constructed by combining surface textures with distinct roughness gradients and representative colors extracted via data mining within the HSV color space. Targeting these two surface coating characteristics—color and texture—systematic evaluations were conducted across three independent perception stages: purely visual, purely tactile, and combined visuo-tactile. Eye-tracking metrics, specifically pupil diameter and total fixation duration, were extracted and cross-analyzed alongside multidimensional subjective evaluations. The results indicate that surface texture exerts a significant main effect on both perceived tactile softness and pleasantness, whereas the impact of color variation is remarkably weak. Furthermore, highly complex surface textures lead to prolonged fixation durations, reflecting increased exploratory interest and the high perceptual salience of intricate details rather than mere cognitive workload. Moreover, significant differences in pupil diameter were observed across texture conditions, potentially reflecting the combined influence of low-level image properties and higher-order texture perception. Concurrently, an interference effect of visual features on tactile perception was observed; specifically, the introduction of visual cues (encompassing color and texture) significantly diminished the pleasantness experienced during tactile interaction. These findings elucidate the intrinsic connections between surface coating characteristics and users’ visuo-tactile perception, offering important theoretical guidance and practical implications for optimizing the surface design of automotive polyurethane synthetic leather and enhancing the overall occupant experience.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-06-15</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 68: Effects of Surface Texture and Color on the Visuo-Tactile Perception of Polyurethane Synthetic Leather for Automotive Seats</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/68">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030068</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Yuxin Yuan
		Shulan Yu
		Zhaolong Zhu
		Dong Jin
		Yu Sun
		</p>
	<p>Polyurethane synthetic leather is a widely used covering material in automotive interiors, and its surface coating characteristics directly determine the occupant experience. However, the underlying mechanisms by which these characteristics influence visuo-tactile perception in the context of new energy vehicles (NEVs) require further investigation. In this study, a composite experimental matrix was constructed by combining surface textures with distinct roughness gradients and representative colors extracted via data mining within the HSV color space. Targeting these two surface coating characteristics—color and texture—systematic evaluations were conducted across three independent perception stages: purely visual, purely tactile, and combined visuo-tactile. Eye-tracking metrics, specifically pupil diameter and total fixation duration, were extracted and cross-analyzed alongside multidimensional subjective evaluations. The results indicate that surface texture exerts a significant main effect on both perceived tactile softness and pleasantness, whereas the impact of color variation is remarkably weak. Furthermore, highly complex surface textures lead to prolonged fixation durations, reflecting increased exploratory interest and the high perceptual salience of intricate details rather than mere cognitive workload. Moreover, significant differences in pupil diameter were observed across texture conditions, potentially reflecting the combined influence of low-level image properties and higher-order texture perception. Concurrently, an interference effect of visual features on tactile perception was observed; specifically, the introduction of visual cues (encompassing color and texture) significantly diminished the pleasantness experienced during tactile interaction. These findings elucidate the intrinsic connections between surface coating characteristics and users’ visuo-tactile perception, offering important theoretical guidance and practical implications for optimizing the surface design of automotive polyurethane synthetic leather and enhancing the overall occupant experience.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Effects of Surface Texture and Color on the Visuo-Tactile Perception of Polyurethane Synthetic Leather for Automotive Seats</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Yuxin Yuan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shulan Yu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zhaolong Zhu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Dong Jin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yu Sun</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030068</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-06-15</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-15</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>68</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030068</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/68</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/67">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 67: Conventional Versus Virtual Reality-Based Hess–Lancaster Assessment: Agreement and Repeatability in Ocular Motility Evaluation</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/67</link>
	<description>Background: The conventional Hess–Lancaster test is widely used to assess ocular misalignment across diagnostic gaze positions, but it relies on subjective responses and manual recording. Virtual reality may provide a more standardized framework for ocular motility assessment. Objectives: To evaluate the agreement and within-method repeatability of point-by-point deviation measurements obtained with the conventional Hess–Lancaster test and a VR-based Hess–Lancaster assessment implemented in Dicopt Pro. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included 52 adults with suspected or diagnosed ocular motility disorders. Participants underwent both assessments using the same predefined gaze positions. Agreement was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis, concordance correlation coefficients, mean absolute differences, and mixed-effects modeling. Repeatability was evaluated in a subset with repeated measurements using session-to-session differences and intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: The VR-based assessment showed moderate agreement with the conventional test, with a mean concordance correlation coefficient of 0.57 for both eyes. Mean bias was 1.22 prism diopters for the right eye and 0.10 prism diopters for the left eye. Repeatability estimates were moderate-to-good, with ICC values ranging from 0.62 to 0.83, although repeated measurements were available only in a subset of participants. Conclusions: The VR-based Hess–Lancaster assessment showed small mean differences and moderate agreement with the conventional test, although both methods should be interpreted within the context of the complete clinical examination.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-06-09</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 67: Conventional Versus Virtual Reality-Based Hess–Lancaster Assessment: Agreement and Repeatability in Ocular Motility Evaluation</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/67">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030067</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Francisco Povedano-Montero
		Álvaro Perales-Serrano
		Daniela León Lobo
		Rut González-Jiménez
		Ricardo Bernárdez-Vilaboa
		Juan Cedrún-Sánchez
		</p>
	<p>Background: The conventional Hess–Lancaster test is widely used to assess ocular misalignment across diagnostic gaze positions, but it relies on subjective responses and manual recording. Virtual reality may provide a more standardized framework for ocular motility assessment. Objectives: To evaluate the agreement and within-method repeatability of point-by-point deviation measurements obtained with the conventional Hess–Lancaster test and a VR-based Hess–Lancaster assessment implemented in Dicopt Pro. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included 52 adults with suspected or diagnosed ocular motility disorders. Participants underwent both assessments using the same predefined gaze positions. Agreement was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis, concordance correlation coefficients, mean absolute differences, and mixed-effects modeling. Repeatability was evaluated in a subset with repeated measurements using session-to-session differences and intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: The VR-based assessment showed moderate agreement with the conventional test, with a mean concordance correlation coefficient of 0.57 for both eyes. Mean bias was 1.22 prism diopters for the right eye and 0.10 prism diopters for the left eye. Repeatability estimates were moderate-to-good, with ICC values ranging from 0.62 to 0.83, although repeated measurements were available only in a subset of participants. Conclusions: The VR-based Hess–Lancaster assessment showed small mean differences and moderate agreement with the conventional test, although both methods should be interpreted within the context of the complete clinical examination.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Conventional Versus Virtual Reality-Based Hess–Lancaster Assessment: Agreement and Repeatability in Ocular Motility Evaluation</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Francisco Povedano-Montero</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Álvaro Perales-Serrano</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Daniela León Lobo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rut González-Jiménez</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ricardo Bernárdez-Vilaboa</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Juan Cedrún-Sánchez</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030067</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-06-09</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>67</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030067</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/67</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/66">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 66: Reading to Translate or Translating to Read? Modeling Translators&amp;rsquo; Eye Movements with Multilingual Pre-Trained Models</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/66</link>
	<description>Translation and post-editing both integrate reading into bilingual text production, yet it remains unclear which computational predictors from multilingual pre-trained models best account for translators&amp;amp;rsquo; reading patterns across task types and translation directions. We recruited twenty-six Chinese L1 translators who completed en&amp;amp;rarr;zh and zh&amp;amp;rarr;en translation and post-editing tasks, yielding 104 eye-tracking sessions. Dependent measures were source reading time (TrtS), target reading time (TrtT), and target production duration (Dur). Predictors were derived from two model architectures, a decoder-only language model (LM) and an encoder&amp;amp;ndash;decoder neural machine translation (NMT) model, and they included monolingual surprisal, translation surprisal with source context, and attention features computed from models&amp;amp;rsquo; internal weights. Analyses showed that LM surprisal provided the strongest account of target reading, while source reading was most strongly predicted by encoder self-attention with LM surprisal, a robust secondary predictor, and target production duration drew on both LM and NMT translation surprisal. Direction effects were broader than task effects, especially on target measures. These findings suggest that although translation reading is bilingual in task structure, cumulative reading time is best explained by monolingual LM surprisal, whereas production duration additionally reflects NMT translation surprisal and revision behavior.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-06-08</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 66: Reading to Translate or Translating to Read? Modeling Translators&amp;rsquo; Eye Movements with Multilingual Pre-Trained Models</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/66">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030066</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Yiyu Zhang
		Xiajing Yao
		Dechao Li
		</p>
	<p>Translation and post-editing both integrate reading into bilingual text production, yet it remains unclear which computational predictors from multilingual pre-trained models best account for translators&amp;amp;rsquo; reading patterns across task types and translation directions. We recruited twenty-six Chinese L1 translators who completed en&amp;amp;rarr;zh and zh&amp;amp;rarr;en translation and post-editing tasks, yielding 104 eye-tracking sessions. Dependent measures were source reading time (TrtS), target reading time (TrtT), and target production duration (Dur). Predictors were derived from two model architectures, a decoder-only language model (LM) and an encoder&amp;amp;ndash;decoder neural machine translation (NMT) model, and they included monolingual surprisal, translation surprisal with source context, and attention features computed from models&amp;amp;rsquo; internal weights. Analyses showed that LM surprisal provided the strongest account of target reading, while source reading was most strongly predicted by encoder self-attention with LM surprisal, a robust secondary predictor, and target production duration drew on both LM and NMT translation surprisal. Direction effects were broader than task effects, especially on target measures. These findings suggest that although translation reading is bilingual in task structure, cumulative reading time is best explained by monolingual LM surprisal, whereas production duration additionally reflects NMT translation surprisal and revision behavior.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Reading to Translate or Translating to Read? Modeling Translators&amp;amp;rsquo; Eye Movements with Multilingual Pre-Trained Models</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Yiyu Zhang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xiajing Yao</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Dechao Li</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030066</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-06-08</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>66</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030066</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/66</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/65">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 65: Correlation Between Accommodative Facility and Light-Evoked Pupil Responses in Individuals with History of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/65</link>
	<description>Introduction: Previous studies have shown those with a history of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) have altered pupillary light responses compared with those without a history of TBI. Those with a history of TBI are also more likely to have accommodative deficits. We investigated the relationship between light-evoked pupil dynamics and accommodative function in individuals who have previously experienced a TBI. Methods: A total of 17 participants with a history of mild TBI were recruited. Pupil metrics were measured using a commercial pupillometer and included baseline diameter, latency, constriction amplitude, average constriction velocity, peak constriction velocity and peak dilation velocity. Accommodative function was assessed using clinical measurements of facility and amplitude. Pupil metrics were compared among those with versus without accommodative dysfunction. Results: One-way ANCOVA testing (controlling for age and time since most recent TBI) comparing groups with and without accommodative dysfunction showed that those with accommodative dysfunction had significantly larger light-evoked pupil constriction amplitudes (p = 0.037) and significantly faster average constriction velocity (p = 0.007) compared with those without accommodative dysfunction. No significant differences were observed for other pupil metrics (p &amp;amp;gt; 0.05 for all). ANCOVA testing (controlling for age and time since TBI) to determine whether decreased amplitude of accommodation or facility was more strongly related to the differences in pupil metrics observed between those with versus without accommodative dysfunction, showed significantly larger light-evoked pupil constriction amplitudes (p = 0.007) and significantly faster average constriction velocity (p = 0.002) among those with reduced accommodative facility compared with those with normal accommodative facility. No statistically significant differences were observed between those with reduced versus normal accommodative amplitude (p &amp;amp;ge; 0.07). Among all participants, monocular accommodative facility measures were significantly correlated with greater pupil constriction amplitude (right eye: rho = &amp;amp;minus;0.721, p = 0.001; left eye: rho = &amp;amp;minus;0.65, p = 0.005), and greater average constriction velocity (right eye: rho = &amp;amp;minus;0.58, p = 0.015; left eye: rho = &amp;amp;minus;0.57, p = 0.016). Conclusions: The results of this small-sample study suggest that accommodative function and light-evoked pupillary dynamics are correlated in individuals with a history of TBI. Those with accommodative dysfunction showed greater pupil constriction amplitudes and velocities and this relationship may reflect shared autonomic or oculomotor mechanisms.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-06-08</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 65: Correlation Between Accommodative Facility and Light-Evoked Pupil Responses in Individuals with History of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/65">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030065</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Curt Fritts-Davis
		Andrew T. E. Hartwick
		Marjean T. Kulp
		</p>
	<p>Introduction: Previous studies have shown those with a history of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) have altered pupillary light responses compared with those without a history of TBI. Those with a history of TBI are also more likely to have accommodative deficits. We investigated the relationship between light-evoked pupil dynamics and accommodative function in individuals who have previously experienced a TBI. Methods: A total of 17 participants with a history of mild TBI were recruited. Pupil metrics were measured using a commercial pupillometer and included baseline diameter, latency, constriction amplitude, average constriction velocity, peak constriction velocity and peak dilation velocity. Accommodative function was assessed using clinical measurements of facility and amplitude. Pupil metrics were compared among those with versus without accommodative dysfunction. Results: One-way ANCOVA testing (controlling for age and time since most recent TBI) comparing groups with and without accommodative dysfunction showed that those with accommodative dysfunction had significantly larger light-evoked pupil constriction amplitudes (p = 0.037) and significantly faster average constriction velocity (p = 0.007) compared with those without accommodative dysfunction. No significant differences were observed for other pupil metrics (p &amp;amp;gt; 0.05 for all). ANCOVA testing (controlling for age and time since TBI) to determine whether decreased amplitude of accommodation or facility was more strongly related to the differences in pupil metrics observed between those with versus without accommodative dysfunction, showed significantly larger light-evoked pupil constriction amplitudes (p = 0.007) and significantly faster average constriction velocity (p = 0.002) among those with reduced accommodative facility compared with those with normal accommodative facility. No statistically significant differences were observed between those with reduced versus normal accommodative amplitude (p &amp;amp;ge; 0.07). Among all participants, monocular accommodative facility measures were significantly correlated with greater pupil constriction amplitude (right eye: rho = &amp;amp;minus;0.721, p = 0.001; left eye: rho = &amp;amp;minus;0.65, p = 0.005), and greater average constriction velocity (right eye: rho = &amp;amp;minus;0.58, p = 0.015; left eye: rho = &amp;amp;minus;0.57, p = 0.016). Conclusions: The results of this small-sample study suggest that accommodative function and light-evoked pupillary dynamics are correlated in individuals with a history of TBI. Those with accommodative dysfunction showed greater pupil constriction amplitudes and velocities and this relationship may reflect shared autonomic or oculomotor mechanisms.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Correlation Between Accommodative Facility and Light-Evoked Pupil Responses in Individuals with History of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Curt Fritts-Davis</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Andrew T. E. Hartwick</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marjean T. Kulp</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030065</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-06-08</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>65</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030065</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/65</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/64">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 64: An Eye-Tracking and Forecasting Experiment on Consumer Purchasing Decisions Through Product Reviews</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/64</link>
	<description>This study aims to provide insight into consumer purchasing decisions by integrating eye-tracking data with forecasting techniques. First, the study investigates how consumption motives (hedonic vs. utilitarian) and purchasing purposes (for oneself vs. for others) influence visual attention and decision-making processes. An experimental design was conducted with 128 participants in a simulated online shopping environment, where eye-tracking data were collected based on fixation counts and durations across defined Areas of Interest (AOIs). Second, a total of 20 input features were collected, comprising fixation counts and fixation durations for 10 review-related Areas of Interest (AOIs), and these features were evaluated across the experimental scenarios, while the binary output variable represented the participant&amp;amp;rsquo;s purchase decision. These biometric features, together with scenario information, were used to forecast purchasing decisions using six machine-learning methods, including Artificial Neural Networks, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naive Bayes, and Logistic Regression. The results indicate that consumers&amp;amp;rsquo; visual attention aligns with their consumption motives and purchasing purposes, revealing distinct gaze patterns across different scenarios. In the forecasting phase, the accuracy of different methods for predicting purchasing decisions using review-related eye-tracking data is evaluated. Support Vector Machines achieved the highest overall accuracy, approximately 59&amp;amp;ndash;60% across the evaluated datasets, compared with a validation-specific majority-class baseline of 53.85%. This corresponds to a modest improvement of approximately 5.15&amp;amp;ndash;6.15 percentage points over the naive benchmark. Overall, the findings suggest that objectively recorded review-related eye-tracking data can be operationalized as behavioral input features in a machine-learning-based purchase-decision classification framework, highlighting the methodological value of integrating eye-tracking insights with consumer behavior forecasting.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-06-06</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 64: An Eye-Tracking and Forecasting Experiment on Consumer Purchasing Decisions Through Product Reviews</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/64">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030064</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Seda Busra Sarac
		Kazim Baris Atici
		Ismail Bezci
		Ata Erinc Dansuk
		Fatma Semira Yildirim
		</p>
	<p>This study aims to provide insight into consumer purchasing decisions by integrating eye-tracking data with forecasting techniques. First, the study investigates how consumption motives (hedonic vs. utilitarian) and purchasing purposes (for oneself vs. for others) influence visual attention and decision-making processes. An experimental design was conducted with 128 participants in a simulated online shopping environment, where eye-tracking data were collected based on fixation counts and durations across defined Areas of Interest (AOIs). Second, a total of 20 input features were collected, comprising fixation counts and fixation durations for 10 review-related Areas of Interest (AOIs), and these features were evaluated across the experimental scenarios, while the binary output variable represented the participant&amp;amp;rsquo;s purchase decision. These biometric features, together with scenario information, were used to forecast purchasing decisions using six machine-learning methods, including Artificial Neural Networks, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naive Bayes, and Logistic Regression. The results indicate that consumers&amp;amp;rsquo; visual attention aligns with their consumption motives and purchasing purposes, revealing distinct gaze patterns across different scenarios. In the forecasting phase, the accuracy of different methods for predicting purchasing decisions using review-related eye-tracking data is evaluated. Support Vector Machines achieved the highest overall accuracy, approximately 59&amp;amp;ndash;60% across the evaluated datasets, compared with a validation-specific majority-class baseline of 53.85%. This corresponds to a modest improvement of approximately 5.15&amp;amp;ndash;6.15 percentage points over the naive benchmark. Overall, the findings suggest that objectively recorded review-related eye-tracking data can be operationalized as behavioral input features in a machine-learning-based purchase-decision classification framework, highlighting the methodological value of integrating eye-tracking insights with consumer behavior forecasting.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>An Eye-Tracking and Forecasting Experiment on Consumer Purchasing Decisions Through Product Reviews</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Seda Busra Sarac</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kazim Baris Atici</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ismail Bezci</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ata Erinc Dansuk</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Fatma Semira Yildirim</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030064</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-06-06</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-06</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>64</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030064</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/64</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/63">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 63: Cognitive Mechanisms of Referential Ambiguity Resolution in L2 Russian by Chinese Learners: Evidence from Eye-Tracking</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/63</link>
	<description>A central question in second language (L2) sentence processing concerns how learners resolve referential ambiguity in real time, particularly when cues from their first language (L1) conflict with those of the target language. Given the substantial typological distance between Chinese (an analytic language) and Russian (a highly inflectional language), this study employs eye-tracking methodology to investigate the developmental trajectory of the cognitive mechanisms in referential ambiguity resolution among Chinese learners of Russian. The results revealed proficiency-related differences in ambiguity processing. Both proficiency groups showed increased processing difficulty when encountering ambiguous pronouns, indicating that referential ambiguity imposed a measurable online cost. High-proficiency learners read more efficiently overall, whereas low-proficiency learners showed a stronger first-mention anchoring pattern. These findings suggest that increasing L2 proficiency is associated with changes in processing efficiency and cue weighting during referential resolution. Notably, even high-proficiency learners did not categorically rely on Russian gender agreement to resolve reference in the morphologically disambiguated condition, suggesting that the integration of morphosyntactic cues into real-time reference resolution remains effortful at advanced proficiency. The study contributes eye-tracking evidence on how Chinese-speaking learners manage referential ambiguity in a morphologically rich L2.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-06-03</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 63: Cognitive Mechanisms of Referential Ambiguity Resolution in L2 Russian by Chinese Learners: Evidence from Eye-Tracking</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/63">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030063</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Tian Ran
		Lijun Guo
		Hong Xu
		</p>
	<p>A central question in second language (L2) sentence processing concerns how learners resolve referential ambiguity in real time, particularly when cues from their first language (L1) conflict with those of the target language. Given the substantial typological distance between Chinese (an analytic language) and Russian (a highly inflectional language), this study employs eye-tracking methodology to investigate the developmental trajectory of the cognitive mechanisms in referential ambiguity resolution among Chinese learners of Russian. The results revealed proficiency-related differences in ambiguity processing. Both proficiency groups showed increased processing difficulty when encountering ambiguous pronouns, indicating that referential ambiguity imposed a measurable online cost. High-proficiency learners read more efficiently overall, whereas low-proficiency learners showed a stronger first-mention anchoring pattern. These findings suggest that increasing L2 proficiency is associated with changes in processing efficiency and cue weighting during referential resolution. Notably, even high-proficiency learners did not categorically rely on Russian gender agreement to resolve reference in the morphologically disambiguated condition, suggesting that the integration of morphosyntactic cues into real-time reference resolution remains effortful at advanced proficiency. The study contributes eye-tracking evidence on how Chinese-speaking learners manage referential ambiguity in a morphologically rich L2.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Cognitive Mechanisms of Referential Ambiguity Resolution in L2 Russian by Chinese Learners: Evidence from Eye-Tracking</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Tian Ran</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lijun Guo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hong Xu</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030063</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-06-03</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>63</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030063</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/63</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/62">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 62: Characterizing Visual Neurosurgical Expertise in Brain MRI Visualization Using Eye-Tracking and 3D Fractal Dimension Analysis</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/62</link>
	<description>Eye-tracking has been utilized to characterize visual behavior in medical image visualization and interpretation, yet neurosurgeons remain underrepresented. Characterizing neurosurgery-specific visual expertise is important for understanding expert search strategies, informing training, and developing computational models. This study examined gaze behavior in na&amp;amp;iuml;ve observers (Np = 29), neurosurgery registrars (Np = 16), and consultant neurosurgeons (Np = 24), viewing normal (Np = 20) and pathological (Np = 19) brain MR images under a free-viewing paradigm. To capture expertise-related characteristics, we analyzed two features at each fixation location: (i) fixation duration, reflecting temporal allocation of visual attention, and (ii) three-dimensional fractal dimension (3DFD) around each fixation location, quantifying local structural complexity. To assess pathological-type effects, we grouped similar pathologies into five stimulus groups. Linear mixed-effects modelling revealed systematic expertise-related differences, with experts exhibiting longer fixation durations in pathological stimulus groups and pathology-type-dependent complexity sampling. Combined fixation duration and 3DFD features captured complementary aspects of visual expertise, improving Random Forest classifier&amp;amp;rsquo;s accuracy (&amp;amp;gt;93%) compared to individual features, for all five stimulus groups. These findings highlight neurosurgery-specific markers of visual expertise and demonstrate that combining behavioral and image-derived features could underpin computational models and training tools that emulate expert-level strategies in neurosurgical image interpretation. Future work should evaluate its applicability to other medical domains.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-06-02</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 62: Characterizing Visual Neurosurgical Expertise in Brain MRI Visualization Using Eye-Tracking and 3D Fractal Dimension Analysis</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/62">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030062</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Poonam Kumari
		Ghasem Azemi
		Carlo Russo
		Antonio Di Ieva
		</p>
	<p>Eye-tracking has been utilized to characterize visual behavior in medical image visualization and interpretation, yet neurosurgeons remain underrepresented. Characterizing neurosurgery-specific visual expertise is important for understanding expert search strategies, informing training, and developing computational models. This study examined gaze behavior in na&amp;amp;iuml;ve observers (Np = 29), neurosurgery registrars (Np = 16), and consultant neurosurgeons (Np = 24), viewing normal (Np = 20) and pathological (Np = 19) brain MR images under a free-viewing paradigm. To capture expertise-related characteristics, we analyzed two features at each fixation location: (i) fixation duration, reflecting temporal allocation of visual attention, and (ii) three-dimensional fractal dimension (3DFD) around each fixation location, quantifying local structural complexity. To assess pathological-type effects, we grouped similar pathologies into five stimulus groups. Linear mixed-effects modelling revealed systematic expertise-related differences, with experts exhibiting longer fixation durations in pathological stimulus groups and pathology-type-dependent complexity sampling. Combined fixation duration and 3DFD features captured complementary aspects of visual expertise, improving Random Forest classifier&amp;amp;rsquo;s accuracy (&amp;amp;gt;93%) compared to individual features, for all five stimulus groups. These findings highlight neurosurgery-specific markers of visual expertise and demonstrate that combining behavioral and image-derived features could underpin computational models and training tools that emulate expert-level strategies in neurosurgical image interpretation. Future work should evaluate its applicability to other medical domains.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Characterizing Visual Neurosurgical Expertise in Brain MRI Visualization Using Eye-Tracking and 3D Fractal Dimension Analysis</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Poonam Kumari</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ghasem Azemi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Carlo Russo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Antonio Di Ieva</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030062</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-06-02</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>62</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030062</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/62</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/61">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 61: Lexical Elaboration and Intentional Vocabulary Acquisition: An Eye-Tracking Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/61</link>
	<description>Prior research on lexical elaboration (providing additional information about unfamiliar words) has yielded non-significant effects on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Building on this, the present study used eye-tracking technology to examine whether similar results replicate under intentional learning conditions. Participants were Korean undergraduate students (N = 67) who were randomly assigned to one of three groups: baseline, unenhanced elaboration, or enhanced elaboration. They were instructed to read an English text twice while their eye movements were recorded. After reading, they responded to two forewarned vocabulary assessments measuring form and meaning recall. Overall, the unenhanced elaboration group exhibited distinct target-word processing patterns and higher meaning recall performance compared to the baseline group, whereas the enhanced elaboration group’s outcomes were comparable to the baseline group. For instance, generalized linear mixed-effects modeling (GLMM) revealed that while the unenhanced elaboration group maintained stable reading times on target words across the two readings, the baseline and enhanced elaboration groups exhibited significant reductions. Furthermore, only the unenhanced elaboration group significantly outperformed the baseline group in meaning recall. Collectively, our findings suggest that lexical elaboration, particularly without input enhancement, may facilitate vocabulary acquisition under intentional learning conditions by promoting more sustained attention to unfamiliar words.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-06-01</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 61: Lexical Elaboration and Intentional Vocabulary Acquisition: An Eye-Tracking Study</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/61">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030061</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Taegang Lee
		Byeongchae Choi
		Sungmook Choi
		Soo-Ok Kweon
		</p>
	<p>Prior research on lexical elaboration (providing additional information about unfamiliar words) has yielded non-significant effects on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Building on this, the present study used eye-tracking technology to examine whether similar results replicate under intentional learning conditions. Participants were Korean undergraduate students (N = 67) who were randomly assigned to one of three groups: baseline, unenhanced elaboration, or enhanced elaboration. They were instructed to read an English text twice while their eye movements were recorded. After reading, they responded to two forewarned vocabulary assessments measuring form and meaning recall. Overall, the unenhanced elaboration group exhibited distinct target-word processing patterns and higher meaning recall performance compared to the baseline group, whereas the enhanced elaboration group’s outcomes were comparable to the baseline group. For instance, generalized linear mixed-effects modeling (GLMM) revealed that while the unenhanced elaboration group maintained stable reading times on target words across the two readings, the baseline and enhanced elaboration groups exhibited significant reductions. Furthermore, only the unenhanced elaboration group significantly outperformed the baseline group in meaning recall. Collectively, our findings suggest that lexical elaboration, particularly without input enhancement, may facilitate vocabulary acquisition under intentional learning conditions by promoting more sustained attention to unfamiliar words.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Lexical Elaboration and Intentional Vocabulary Acquisition: An Eye-Tracking Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Taegang Lee</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Byeongchae Choi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sungmook Choi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Soo-Ok Kweon</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030061</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-06-01</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>61</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030061</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/61</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/60">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 60: The Geometry of Suspicion: Visual Exploration Patterns in Email Phishing Detection</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/60</link>
	<description>This study examined visual exploration strategies in phishing-email detection by integrating conventional AOI-based eye-tracking measures with a complementary scene-based indicator, the Nearest Neighbor Index (NNI), to capture the global spatial organization of fixations. Thirty-two volunteers completed an email-classification task involving 106 static email stimuli; data from 30 participants were included in the final analyses. For each stimulus, participants judged whether the email was authentic or phishing, allowing for the computation of eye-tracking metrics across Signal Detection Theory classification outcomes. Concerning the NNI, the results showed that the spatial distribution of fixations was higher for suspicious than for non-suspicious emails, indicating a broader visual exploration pattern under higher task demands. More importantly, correct and incorrect responses differed reliably: hits were associated with more dispersed and regular fixation patterns, whereas false alarms were associated with more clustered scanning; misses showed a descriptively similar tendency that did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. Participants also responded faster when correct than when incorrect. When cybersecurity awareness (CAIN) was included as a mean-centered covariate, the primary effects of Signal and Outcome on NNI and decision time remained significant, indicating that the experimental effects are robust to individual differences in cybersecurity knowledge. However, CAIN did not emerge as a reliable predictor of eye-tracking measures within these models, suggesting that its role operates more at the level of classification performance than moment-by-moment gaze organization.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-06-01</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 60: The Geometry of Suspicion: Visual Exploration Patterns in Email Phishing Detection</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/60">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030060</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Francesco Di Nocera
		Lorenzo Arciulo
		Giorgia Tempestini
		Pierpaolo Zivi
		Giulio Errico
		Fabio Ferlazzo
		</p>
	<p>This study examined visual exploration strategies in phishing-email detection by integrating conventional AOI-based eye-tracking measures with a complementary scene-based indicator, the Nearest Neighbor Index (NNI), to capture the global spatial organization of fixations. Thirty-two volunteers completed an email-classification task involving 106 static email stimuli; data from 30 participants were included in the final analyses. For each stimulus, participants judged whether the email was authentic or phishing, allowing for the computation of eye-tracking metrics across Signal Detection Theory classification outcomes. Concerning the NNI, the results showed that the spatial distribution of fixations was higher for suspicious than for non-suspicious emails, indicating a broader visual exploration pattern under higher task demands. More importantly, correct and incorrect responses differed reliably: hits were associated with more dispersed and regular fixation patterns, whereas false alarms were associated with more clustered scanning; misses showed a descriptively similar tendency that did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. Participants also responded faster when correct than when incorrect. When cybersecurity awareness (CAIN) was included as a mean-centered covariate, the primary effects of Signal and Outcome on NNI and decision time remained significant, indicating that the experimental effects are robust to individual differences in cybersecurity knowledge. However, CAIN did not emerge as a reliable predictor of eye-tracking measures within these models, suggesting that its role operates more at the level of classification performance than moment-by-moment gaze organization.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>The Geometry of Suspicion: Visual Exploration Patterns in Email Phishing Detection</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Francesco Di Nocera</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lorenzo Arciulo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Giorgia Tempestini</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Pierpaolo Zivi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Giulio Errico</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Fabio Ferlazzo</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030060</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-06-01</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>60</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030060</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/60</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/59">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 59: Active Vision in Driving: Joint Modeling of Scanpaths and Risk Perception</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/59</link>
	<description>Under the Active Vision hypothesis, eye movements are not passive responses to visual stimuli but are actively guided by task demands and internal goals. In driving, scanpaths may therefore reflect an ongoing process of information sampling for risk assessment. However, current computational models often isolate scanpath prediction from risk assessment, overlooking their intrinsic cognitive coupling. In this study, we investigate whether driver scanpaths and traffic risk perception can be jointly modeled within a unified framework. We propose a computational approach based on the introduced Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning (AIRL), where gaze behavior is interpreted as a policy that maximizes a latent safety-related reward. By employing a generator to simulate human-like sequences of fixations and saccades, and a discriminator to approximate the internal reward signal, our framework ensures that generated scanpaths synergistically inform downstream risk perception. To facilitate this research, we constructed the BDDA dataset, aggregating over 13,000 spatio-temporal gaze points with explicit risk annotations to study this joint mechanism. Experimental results indicate that simultaneously modeling the &amp;amp;ldquo;where&amp;amp;rdquo; (scanpath dynamics) and the &amp;amp;ldquo;why&amp;amp;rdquo; (risk perception) significantly outperforms the compared baseline methods on the proposed BDDA dataset. These findings provide computational evidence for a functional coupling between visual attention and risk perception, supporting the view that eye movements serve as an active mechanism for acquiring task-relevant information in safety-critical environments.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-06-01</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 59: Active Vision in Driving: Joint Modeling of Scanpaths and Risk Perception</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/59">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030059</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Chao Gou
		Yueyao Lin
		Yuchen Zhou
		Wenjie Shi
		Jincheng Jiang
		</p>
	<p>Under the Active Vision hypothesis, eye movements are not passive responses to visual stimuli but are actively guided by task demands and internal goals. In driving, scanpaths may therefore reflect an ongoing process of information sampling for risk assessment. However, current computational models often isolate scanpath prediction from risk assessment, overlooking their intrinsic cognitive coupling. In this study, we investigate whether driver scanpaths and traffic risk perception can be jointly modeled within a unified framework. We propose a computational approach based on the introduced Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning (AIRL), where gaze behavior is interpreted as a policy that maximizes a latent safety-related reward. By employing a generator to simulate human-like sequences of fixations and saccades, and a discriminator to approximate the internal reward signal, our framework ensures that generated scanpaths synergistically inform downstream risk perception. To facilitate this research, we constructed the BDDA dataset, aggregating over 13,000 spatio-temporal gaze points with explicit risk annotations to study this joint mechanism. Experimental results indicate that simultaneously modeling the &amp;amp;ldquo;where&amp;amp;rdquo; (scanpath dynamics) and the &amp;amp;ldquo;why&amp;amp;rdquo; (risk perception) significantly outperforms the compared baseline methods on the proposed BDDA dataset. These findings provide computational evidence for a functional coupling between visual attention and risk perception, supporting the view that eye movements serve as an active mechanism for acquiring task-relevant information in safety-critical environments.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Active Vision in Driving: Joint Modeling of Scanpaths and Risk Perception</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Chao Gou</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yueyao Lin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yuchen Zhou</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Wenjie Shi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jincheng Jiang</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030059</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-06-01</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>59</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030059</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/59</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/58">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 58: Effects of Notation Type and Score Difficulty on Eye Movements During Erhu Sight-Reading</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/58</link>
	<description>A parallel notational system comprising number notation and staff notation has long been employed in the pedagogy of traditional Chinese instrumental music. However, it remains unclear how these two representationally distinct notational systems shape performers&amp;amp;rsquo; visual-processing strategies. Therefore, using eye-tracking methods, the present study examined the interactive effects of notation type and score difficulty on visual&amp;amp;ndash;cognitive processing in a sight-reading task performed on the erhu, a Chinese two-stringed bowed musical instrument. The results showed that increased difficulty generally led to greater fixation-related load and a contracted eye&amp;amp;ndash;hand span (EHS). Interaction analyses further indicated that numbered notation was associated with a more favorable eye-movement profile at intermediate difficulty, whereas this pattern was attenuated under difficult score conditions and accompanied by increased processing demands. In contrast, the eye-movement measures in staff notation appeared to be less sensitive to difficulty-related changes than those observed in numbered notation, a pattern that may reflect differences in the representational structures of the two notational systems. Collectively, these findings suggest that notational symbols may modulate sight-reading strategies among trained erhu students, providing preliminary evidence for music reading across different notational systems.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-27</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 58: Effects of Notation Type and Score Difficulty on Eye Movements During Erhu Sight-Reading</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/58">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030058</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Siyu Li
		Yi Weng
		Xiyu Wu
		</p>
	<p>A parallel notational system comprising number notation and staff notation has long been employed in the pedagogy of traditional Chinese instrumental music. However, it remains unclear how these two representationally distinct notational systems shape performers&amp;amp;rsquo; visual-processing strategies. Therefore, using eye-tracking methods, the present study examined the interactive effects of notation type and score difficulty on visual&amp;amp;ndash;cognitive processing in a sight-reading task performed on the erhu, a Chinese two-stringed bowed musical instrument. The results showed that increased difficulty generally led to greater fixation-related load and a contracted eye&amp;amp;ndash;hand span (EHS). Interaction analyses further indicated that numbered notation was associated with a more favorable eye-movement profile at intermediate difficulty, whereas this pattern was attenuated under difficult score conditions and accompanied by increased processing demands. In contrast, the eye-movement measures in staff notation appeared to be less sensitive to difficulty-related changes than those observed in numbered notation, a pattern that may reflect differences in the representational structures of the two notational systems. Collectively, these findings suggest that notational symbols may modulate sight-reading strategies among trained erhu students, providing preliminary evidence for music reading across different notational systems.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Effects of Notation Type and Score Difficulty on Eye Movements During Erhu Sight-Reading</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Siyu Li</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yi Weng</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xiyu Wu</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030058</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-27</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>58</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030058</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/58</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/57">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 57: Machine Learning Integration of Eye-Tracking and Cognitive Screening for Detecting Cognitive Impairment</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/57</link>
	<description>Cognitive impairment is common in Post-COVID-19 Condition (PCC), yet full neuropsychological testing remains resource-intensive. Because eye movements are known to be altered in certain cognitive disorders, Eye-Tracking (ET) offers a fast, non-invasive complementary approach for large-scale screening. This study aimed to predict neuropsychological test scores of participants with PCC from ET metrics using machine and deep learning models. ET data was collected from 172 participants performing a battery of visual tasks designed to elicit smooth pursuit and fixational eye movements, as well as pupil responses to light. Cognitive performance was assessed through established neuropsychological tests. We applied regression and classification models (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost, and deep neural networks) to predict neuropsychological performance. Models were trained using ET data alone and in combination with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, a widely used neuropsychological test for global cognitive screening. Although predicting individual test scores was challenging, combining them into a global composite measure improved performance. Model sensitivity and specificity reached 88% and 34% using ET data alone, and 87% and 60% when integrating ET with MoCA. This last trained model outperformed the conventional MoCA, highlighting the potential of ET as a rapid screening support tool for cognitive assessment.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-20</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 57: Machine Learning Integration of Eye-Tracking and Cognitive Screening for Detecting Cognitive Impairment</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/57">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030057</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Joan Goset
		Clara Mestre
		Valldeflors Vinuela-Navarro
		Mikel Aldaba
		Mar Ariza
		Neus Cano
		Bàrbara Delàs
		Olga Gelonch
		Maite Garolera
		 REHAB Project Collaborative Group
		Meritxell Vilaseca
		</p>
	<p>Cognitive impairment is common in Post-COVID-19 Condition (PCC), yet full neuropsychological testing remains resource-intensive. Because eye movements are known to be altered in certain cognitive disorders, Eye-Tracking (ET) offers a fast, non-invasive complementary approach for large-scale screening. This study aimed to predict neuropsychological test scores of participants with PCC from ET metrics using machine and deep learning models. ET data was collected from 172 participants performing a battery of visual tasks designed to elicit smooth pursuit and fixational eye movements, as well as pupil responses to light. Cognitive performance was assessed through established neuropsychological tests. We applied regression and classification models (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost, and deep neural networks) to predict neuropsychological performance. Models were trained using ET data alone and in combination with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, a widely used neuropsychological test for global cognitive screening. Although predicting individual test scores was challenging, combining them into a global composite measure improved performance. Model sensitivity and specificity reached 88% and 34% using ET data alone, and 87% and 60% when integrating ET with MoCA. This last trained model outperformed the conventional MoCA, highlighting the potential of ET as a rapid screening support tool for cognitive assessment.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Machine Learning Integration of Eye-Tracking and Cognitive Screening for Detecting Cognitive Impairment</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Joan Goset</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Clara Mestre</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Valldeflors Vinuela-Navarro</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mikel Aldaba</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mar Ariza</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Neus Cano</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Bàrbara Delàs</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Olga Gelonch</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Maite Garolera</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator> REHAB Project Collaborative Group</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Meritxell Vilaseca</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030057</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-20</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030057</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/57</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/56">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 56: Ab Initio Binocular Formulation of Listing&amp;rsquo;s Law</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/56</link>
	<description>Human eyes do not have perfectly aligned optical components; the fovea is displaced from the posterior pole, and the crystalline lens is tilted away from the eye&amp;amp;rsquo;s optical axis. Important in the study of vision quality, it is included here in binocular and oculomotor research. In the binocular system, with the eye&amp;amp;rsquo;s optical asymmetry, all axes differ. The eye&amp;amp;rsquo;s posture change is decomposed into the torsion-free part that gives the change in visual axis direction and the torsional part that best approximates the rotation about the lens&amp;amp;rsquo;s optical axis. This geometric formulation, supported by computer simulations and modern ophthalmology studies, leads to binocular Listing&amp;amp;rsquo;s law and the related half-angle rule, important for oculomotor control by constraining the eye&amp;amp;rsquo;s redundant torsional degree of freedom. The eye&amp;amp;rsquo;s primary position and the Listing plane, indispensable ingredients of Listing&amp;amp;rsquo;s law, are replaced with the binocular eyes&amp;amp;rsquo; posture corresponding to the eye muscles&amp;amp;rsquo; natural tonus resting position, which serves as a zero-reference level for convergence effort. Further, the binocular constraints couple 3D changes in the torsional positions of the eyes within the ab initio formulation of Listing&amp;amp;rsquo;s law here, which was previously proposed ad hoc. Finally, the noncommutativity rule underlying Listing&amp;amp;rsquo;s law and the half-angle rule are discussed by specifying the configuration space of sequences of fixations of binocularly constrained eyes, which are visualized in 3D simulations. The results obtained in this study should be a part of the answers to the questions posted in the literature on the relevance of Listing&amp;amp;rsquo;s law to clinical practices.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-16</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 56: Ab Initio Binocular Formulation of Listing&amp;rsquo;s Law</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/56">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030056</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Jacek Turski
		</p>
	<p>Human eyes do not have perfectly aligned optical components; the fovea is displaced from the posterior pole, and the crystalline lens is tilted away from the eye&amp;amp;rsquo;s optical axis. Important in the study of vision quality, it is included here in binocular and oculomotor research. In the binocular system, with the eye&amp;amp;rsquo;s optical asymmetry, all axes differ. The eye&amp;amp;rsquo;s posture change is decomposed into the torsion-free part that gives the change in visual axis direction and the torsional part that best approximates the rotation about the lens&amp;amp;rsquo;s optical axis. This geometric formulation, supported by computer simulations and modern ophthalmology studies, leads to binocular Listing&amp;amp;rsquo;s law and the related half-angle rule, important for oculomotor control by constraining the eye&amp;amp;rsquo;s redundant torsional degree of freedom. The eye&amp;amp;rsquo;s primary position and the Listing plane, indispensable ingredients of Listing&amp;amp;rsquo;s law, are replaced with the binocular eyes&amp;amp;rsquo; posture corresponding to the eye muscles&amp;amp;rsquo; natural tonus resting position, which serves as a zero-reference level for convergence effort. Further, the binocular constraints couple 3D changes in the torsional positions of the eyes within the ab initio formulation of Listing&amp;amp;rsquo;s law here, which was previously proposed ad hoc. Finally, the noncommutativity rule underlying Listing&amp;amp;rsquo;s law and the half-angle rule are discussed by specifying the configuration space of sequences of fixations of binocularly constrained eyes, which are visualized in 3D simulations. The results obtained in this study should be a part of the answers to the questions posted in the literature on the relevance of Listing&amp;amp;rsquo;s law to clinical practices.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Ab Initio Binocular Formulation of Listing&amp;amp;rsquo;s Law</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Jacek Turski</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030056</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-16</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-16</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>56</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030056</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/56</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/55">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 55: Eye-Tracking Evidence That Verifiable Explanations Support Visual Evidence Checking in AI-Assisted Chest Radiograph Interpretation</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/55</link>
	<description>Evaluations of medical artificial intelligence (AI) explanations often rely on self-reported trust, perceived usefulness, acceptance, or final decision outcomes, while less directly characterizing whether users check evidence around AI outputs during decision making. In AI-assisted chest radiograph interpretation, a critical process-level question is whether users return from the AI output to the original image evidence when further scrutiny is needed. To address this question, we examined whether verifiable explanations&amp;amp;mdash;explanations designed to make AI recommendations checkable against the original image evidence&amp;amp;mdash;are associated with process markers of visual evidence checking in AI-assisted chest radiograph interpretation using eye-tracking and human-factors process measures. A 2 &amp;amp;times; 2 between-subjects experiment manipulated verifiable explanations (present vs. absent) and risk context (high vs. low), with AI recommendation correctness embedded at the trial level. Fifty-six clinically trained participants each completed 24 interpretation trials. Analyses focused primarily on gaze transitions between the AI output and the original image and dwell time on the original image, with response time and exploratory verification-related behavioral states used as auxiliary process measures. Verifiable explanations did not simply increase acceptance of AI recommendations. Instead, when AI recommendations were incorrect, they were most clearly associated with more frequent AI&amp;amp;ndash;image transitions and longer absolute dwell time on the original image evidence. Exploratory state-based analyses further suggested a lower tendency toward no-verify adopt under incorrect AI recommendations, but these findings were treated as complementary rather than primary evidence. Overall, the value of verifiable explanations lies not only in final decisions but in whether they make AI recommendations more inspectable against the original evidence. These findings provide eye-tracking evidence consistent with visual evidence checking in AI-assisted diagnostic interfaces and underscore the value of process-sensitive human-factors measures in medical AI evaluation.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-15</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 55: Eye-Tracking Evidence That Verifiable Explanations Support Visual Evidence Checking in AI-Assisted Chest Radiograph Interpretation</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/55">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030055</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Yong Han
		Wumin Ouyang
		Hemin Du
		Mengyun Ma
		Guanning Wang
		</p>
	<p>Evaluations of medical artificial intelligence (AI) explanations often rely on self-reported trust, perceived usefulness, acceptance, or final decision outcomes, while less directly characterizing whether users check evidence around AI outputs during decision making. In AI-assisted chest radiograph interpretation, a critical process-level question is whether users return from the AI output to the original image evidence when further scrutiny is needed. To address this question, we examined whether verifiable explanations&amp;amp;mdash;explanations designed to make AI recommendations checkable against the original image evidence&amp;amp;mdash;are associated with process markers of visual evidence checking in AI-assisted chest radiograph interpretation using eye-tracking and human-factors process measures. A 2 &amp;amp;times; 2 between-subjects experiment manipulated verifiable explanations (present vs. absent) and risk context (high vs. low), with AI recommendation correctness embedded at the trial level. Fifty-six clinically trained participants each completed 24 interpretation trials. Analyses focused primarily on gaze transitions between the AI output and the original image and dwell time on the original image, with response time and exploratory verification-related behavioral states used as auxiliary process measures. Verifiable explanations did not simply increase acceptance of AI recommendations. Instead, when AI recommendations were incorrect, they were most clearly associated with more frequent AI&amp;amp;ndash;image transitions and longer absolute dwell time on the original image evidence. Exploratory state-based analyses further suggested a lower tendency toward no-verify adopt under incorrect AI recommendations, but these findings were treated as complementary rather than primary evidence. Overall, the value of verifiable explanations lies not only in final decisions but in whether they make AI recommendations more inspectable against the original evidence. These findings provide eye-tracking evidence consistent with visual evidence checking in AI-assisted diagnostic interfaces and underscore the value of process-sensitive human-factors measures in medical AI evaluation.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Eye-Tracking Evidence That Verifiable Explanations Support Visual Evidence Checking in AI-Assisted Chest Radiograph Interpretation</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Yong Han</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Wumin Ouyang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hemin Du</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mengyun Ma</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Guanning Wang</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030055</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-15</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>55</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030055</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/55</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/54">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 54: Cognitive Mechanisms of Predictive Processing in Chinese Reading: An Eye-Movement Analysis Based on the Ex-Gaussian Distribution</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/54</link>
	<description>This study employed the Ex-Gaussian distribution model to analyse eye-tracking data, to elucidate the cognitive mechanisms underlying predictive processing during Chinese reading. Using a single-factor, two-level within-subjects design (contextual predictability: high vs. low), data from 32 adult readers were analysed across the pre-target and target word regions. The results revealed that predictive reading follows a three-stage cognitive model. In the expectation generation stage (pre-target region), a significant negative τ effect indicated resource pre-allocation driven by strong contextual constraints, thereby facilitating the construction of predictive lexical representations. In the verification and integration stage (target word region), a significant negative μ effect in the later measurement window indicated that successful prediction–input matching accelerated lexical identification and enhanced integration efficiency; the σ parameter did not reach significance in either measurement window. In the conflict resolution stage (pre-target and target word regions), a significant positive τ effect indicated that verification failure triggered lexical activation competition at the target word, driving regressive fixations to the pre-target region for contextual reanalysis; conflict resolution costs were markedly higher under the low-predictability condition, owing to the absence of a dominant activation anchor. These findings suggest that contextual predictability influences reading through a dual mechanism: the μ parameter modulates the automatic processing speed of lexical identification, whereas the τ parameter regulates the cognitive control processes underlying expectation generation and conflict resolution. Together, these results provide empirical support for the integration of predictive coding theory and cognitive control frameworks.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-15</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 54: Cognitive Mechanisms of Predictive Processing in Chinese Reading: An Eye-Movement Analysis Based on the Ex-Gaussian Distribution</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/54">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030054</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Wen Tong
		Xiaojiao Li
		Yingdi Liu
		Zhifang Liu
		</p>
	<p>This study employed the Ex-Gaussian distribution model to analyse eye-tracking data, to elucidate the cognitive mechanisms underlying predictive processing during Chinese reading. Using a single-factor, two-level within-subjects design (contextual predictability: high vs. low), data from 32 adult readers were analysed across the pre-target and target word regions. The results revealed that predictive reading follows a three-stage cognitive model. In the expectation generation stage (pre-target region), a significant negative τ effect indicated resource pre-allocation driven by strong contextual constraints, thereby facilitating the construction of predictive lexical representations. In the verification and integration stage (target word region), a significant negative μ effect in the later measurement window indicated that successful prediction–input matching accelerated lexical identification and enhanced integration efficiency; the σ parameter did not reach significance in either measurement window. In the conflict resolution stage (pre-target and target word regions), a significant positive τ effect indicated that verification failure triggered lexical activation competition at the target word, driving regressive fixations to the pre-target region for contextual reanalysis; conflict resolution costs were markedly higher under the low-predictability condition, owing to the absence of a dominant activation anchor. These findings suggest that contextual predictability influences reading through a dual mechanism: the μ parameter modulates the automatic processing speed of lexical identification, whereas the τ parameter regulates the cognitive control processes underlying expectation generation and conflict resolution. Together, these results provide empirical support for the integration of predictive coding theory and cognitive control frameworks.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Cognitive Mechanisms of Predictive Processing in Chinese Reading: An Eye-Movement Analysis Based on the Ex-Gaussian Distribution</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Wen Tong</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xiaojiao Li</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yingdi Liu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zhifang Liu</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030054</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-15</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>54</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030054</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/54</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/53">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 53: Diagnostic Criteria for Convergence Excess: Diagnostic Validity of Clinical Signs Associated with Near Esophoria</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/53</link>
	<description>To propose which tests may be used for diagnosing convergence excess. A prospective study of a consecutive clinical sample was performed. Patients (18&amp;amp;ndash;35 years) attending optometric care underwent subjective refraction, cover test, and Symptom Questionnaire for Visual Dysfunctions (SQVD). Based on cover test and SQVD scores, two groups were recruited: 64 symptomatic subjects with near esophoria and 64 asymptomatic with normal binocular vision. Accommodative and binocular tests were assessed, identifying those with significant statistical differences between groups. Diagnostic validity was analysed using ROC curves, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. A serial testing strategy combining tests was also evaluated. ROC analysis showed best diagnostic accuracy for binocular accommodative facility (BAF) failing with &amp;amp;minus;2.00 D (area under the curve, AUC = 0.865) and vergence facility (VF) failing with base-in prisms (AUC = 0.864). Using cutoffs from ROC analysis (BAF: &amp;amp;le;8.25 cpm and VF &amp;amp;le; 12.75 cpm), their combination showed best validity (S = 0.625, Sp = 0.938, LR+ = 10, LR&amp;amp;minus; = 0.4). The combined AUC was 0.932. The proposal for diagnosing convergence excess is to use, in addition to near esophoria with normal distance heterophoria, the combination of failing BAF with negative lenses and failing vergence facility with base-in prisms.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-14</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 53: Diagnostic Criteria for Convergence Excess: Diagnostic Validity of Clinical Signs Associated with Near Esophoria</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/53">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030053</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Pilar Cacho-Martínez
		Mario Cantó-Cerdán
		Zaíra Cervera-Sánchez
		Ángel García-Muñoz
		</p>
	<p>To propose which tests may be used for diagnosing convergence excess. A prospective study of a consecutive clinical sample was performed. Patients (18&amp;amp;ndash;35 years) attending optometric care underwent subjective refraction, cover test, and Symptom Questionnaire for Visual Dysfunctions (SQVD). Based on cover test and SQVD scores, two groups were recruited: 64 symptomatic subjects with near esophoria and 64 asymptomatic with normal binocular vision. Accommodative and binocular tests were assessed, identifying those with significant statistical differences between groups. Diagnostic validity was analysed using ROC curves, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. A serial testing strategy combining tests was also evaluated. ROC analysis showed best diagnostic accuracy for binocular accommodative facility (BAF) failing with &amp;amp;minus;2.00 D (area under the curve, AUC = 0.865) and vergence facility (VF) failing with base-in prisms (AUC = 0.864). Using cutoffs from ROC analysis (BAF: &amp;amp;le;8.25 cpm and VF &amp;amp;le; 12.75 cpm), their combination showed best validity (S = 0.625, Sp = 0.938, LR+ = 10, LR&amp;amp;minus; = 0.4). The combined AUC was 0.932. The proposal for diagnosing convergence excess is to use, in addition to near esophoria with normal distance heterophoria, the combination of failing BAF with negative lenses and failing vergence facility with base-in prisms.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Diagnostic Criteria for Convergence Excess: Diagnostic Validity of Clinical Signs Associated with Near Esophoria</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Pilar Cacho-Martínez</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mario Cantó-Cerdán</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zaíra Cervera-Sánchez</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ángel García-Muñoz</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030053</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-14</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>53</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030053</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/53</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/52">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 52: Effects of Word Frequency, Word Length, and Visual Complexity on Chinese Sentence Oral Reading: An Eye Movement Comparison Study Between Children and Adults</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/52</link>
	<description>This study investigated how word frequency, word length and visual complexity affect lexical processing during Chinese sentence oral reading, and whether these effects differ between developing and skilled readers. Third-grade children and adults read sentences aloud while their eye movements were recorded with an EyeLink 1000 Plus eye-tracker. Linear mixed-effects models revealed three main findings. First, children showed larger word-frequency and visual-complexity effects than adults, indicating less efficient lexical processing in developing readers. Second, word length moderated the effects of word frequency and visual complexity. Frequency effects were amplified for two-character words, whereas visual-complexity effects were stronger for single-character words on early measures and followed a different pattern on some late measures. Third, at the sentence level, children exhibited shorter forward saccades, more regressions and longer total reading times than adults. These findings provide developmental evidence for the visual and linguistic constraints hypothesis and show how visual recognition and overt phonological output jointly shape foveal lexical processing in Chinese oral reading.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-13</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 52: Effects of Word Frequency, Word Length, and Visual Complexity on Chinese Sentence Oral Reading: An Eye Movement Comparison Study Between Children and Adults</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/52">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030052</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Kunyu Lian
		Junhui Pei
		Feifei Liang
		Jie Ma
		Rong Lian
		Xuejun Bai
		</p>
	<p>This study investigated how word frequency, word length and visual complexity affect lexical processing during Chinese sentence oral reading, and whether these effects differ between developing and skilled readers. Third-grade children and adults read sentences aloud while their eye movements were recorded with an EyeLink 1000 Plus eye-tracker. Linear mixed-effects models revealed three main findings. First, children showed larger word-frequency and visual-complexity effects than adults, indicating less efficient lexical processing in developing readers. Second, word length moderated the effects of word frequency and visual complexity. Frequency effects were amplified for two-character words, whereas visual-complexity effects were stronger for single-character words on early measures and followed a different pattern on some late measures. Third, at the sentence level, children exhibited shorter forward saccades, more regressions and longer total reading times than adults. These findings provide developmental evidence for the visual and linguistic constraints hypothesis and show how visual recognition and overt phonological output jointly shape foveal lexical processing in Chinese oral reading.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Effects of Word Frequency, Word Length, and Visual Complexity on Chinese Sentence Oral Reading: An Eye Movement Comparison Study Between Children and Adults</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Kunyu Lian</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Junhui Pei</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Feifei Liang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jie Ma</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rong Lian</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xuejun Bai</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030052</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-13</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>52</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030052</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/52</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/51">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 51: Eye Movement Patterns as Robust Biomarkers for Schizophrenia Identification Using a Novel Data Transformation Approach</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/51</link>
	<description>Although eye movement abnormalities are documented in schizophrenia (SZ), their translation into objective diagnostic biomarkers remains limited. In this study, we propose a novel identification framework that integrates a Sparsity-Scoring Kernel Entropy Component Analysis (SSKECA) algorithm with a multidimensional eye movement feature set. A total of 40 patients with SZ and 50 healthy controls (HC) completed a free-viewing task involving 100 distinct semantic images. The proposed SSKECA algorithm optimizes multidimensional feature representations to capture latent eye movement patterns characteristic of SZ. The SSKECA&amp;amp;ndash;AdaBoost model achieved competitive performance, with an accuracy of 0.933 and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.960. Notably, when restricted to only 25 highly discriminative images, the SSKECA&amp;amp;ndash;XGBoost model achieved an accuracy of 0.922. Feature ablation analyses not only reproduced previously reported eye movement findings but also highlighted additional atypical patterns. Misclassification analyses revealed more pronounced eye movement deficits in incorrectly classified SZ patients. Overall, the proposed framework translates complex eye movement patterns into robust indicators for subject-level identification, offering a practical and efficient tool to support objective assessment in SZ.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-11</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 51: Eye Movement Patterns as Robust Biomarkers for Schizophrenia Identification Using a Novel Data Transformation Approach</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/51">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030051</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Lijin Huang
		Senhao Li
		Zhi Liu
		Dan Zhang
		Lihua Xu
		Tianhong Zhang
		Jijun Wang
		</p>
	<p>Although eye movement abnormalities are documented in schizophrenia (SZ), their translation into objective diagnostic biomarkers remains limited. In this study, we propose a novel identification framework that integrates a Sparsity-Scoring Kernel Entropy Component Analysis (SSKECA) algorithm with a multidimensional eye movement feature set. A total of 40 patients with SZ and 50 healthy controls (HC) completed a free-viewing task involving 100 distinct semantic images. The proposed SSKECA algorithm optimizes multidimensional feature representations to capture latent eye movement patterns characteristic of SZ. The SSKECA&amp;amp;ndash;AdaBoost model achieved competitive performance, with an accuracy of 0.933 and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.960. Notably, when restricted to only 25 highly discriminative images, the SSKECA&amp;amp;ndash;XGBoost model achieved an accuracy of 0.922. Feature ablation analyses not only reproduced previously reported eye movement findings but also highlighted additional atypical patterns. Misclassification analyses revealed more pronounced eye movement deficits in incorrectly classified SZ patients. Overall, the proposed framework translates complex eye movement patterns into robust indicators for subject-level identification, offering a practical and efficient tool to support objective assessment in SZ.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Eye Movement Patterns as Robust Biomarkers for Schizophrenia Identification Using a Novel Data Transformation Approach</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Lijin Huang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Senhao Li</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zhi Liu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Dan Zhang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lihua Xu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tianhong Zhang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jijun Wang</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030051</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-11</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030051</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/51</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/50">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 50: Quantification of Cognitive States via Eye Tracking and Using Artificial Intelligence to Analyze Virtual Reality Learning Experiences</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/50</link>
	<description>Virtual reality (VR) technology provides a high sense of immersion and presence to users and can enhance the engagement and performance of learning. However, the VR learning environment introduces more complex audio&amp;amp;ndash;visual stimuli than the traditional multimedia learning environment. These excessive stimuli cause negative effects such as distraction and cognitive overload. To minimize these negative impacts and improve the learning environment, we must evaluate learners&amp;amp;rsquo; cognitive states under the VR environment. Cognitive states can be evaluated subjectively (e.g., through questionnaires) or objectively (e.g., using biometric signals). Subjective and objective methods must be used simultaneously, and correlations between them must be analyzed for quantifying objective measures. The accurate detection of cognitive states is challenging for traditional statistical analysis methods, necessitating the exploration of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques that can classify cognitive states. This study develops a VR learning experience evaluation system based on eye-tracking data. Cognitive states during VR learning are classified as cognitive overload, immersion, and distraction. Correlations between each cognitive state and eye-tracking metrics are evaluated, and the possibility of cognitive-state quantification is discussed. An LSTM-based model developed in this study classified cognitive states from eye-tracking data with moderate accuracy (75.60%) under a subject-independent validation setting.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-05</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 50: Quantification of Cognitive States via Eye Tracking and Using Artificial Intelligence to Analyze Virtual Reality Learning Experiences</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/50">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030050</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Haram Choi
		Sanghun Nam
		</p>
	<p>Virtual reality (VR) technology provides a high sense of immersion and presence to users and can enhance the engagement and performance of learning. However, the VR learning environment introduces more complex audio&amp;amp;ndash;visual stimuli than the traditional multimedia learning environment. These excessive stimuli cause negative effects such as distraction and cognitive overload. To minimize these negative impacts and improve the learning environment, we must evaluate learners&amp;amp;rsquo; cognitive states under the VR environment. Cognitive states can be evaluated subjectively (e.g., through questionnaires) or objectively (e.g., using biometric signals). Subjective and objective methods must be used simultaneously, and correlations between them must be analyzed for quantifying objective measures. The accurate detection of cognitive states is challenging for traditional statistical analysis methods, necessitating the exploration of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques that can classify cognitive states. This study develops a VR learning experience evaluation system based on eye-tracking data. Cognitive states during VR learning are classified as cognitive overload, immersion, and distraction. Correlations between each cognitive state and eye-tracking metrics are evaluated, and the possibility of cognitive-state quantification is discussed. An LSTM-based model developed in this study classified cognitive states from eye-tracking data with moderate accuracy (75.60%) under a subject-independent validation setting.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Quantification of Cognitive States via Eye Tracking and Using Artificial Intelligence to Analyze Virtual Reality Learning Experiences</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Haram Choi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sanghun Nam</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030050</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-05</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>50</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030050</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/50</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/49">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 49: Oculomotor Vergence Eye Movement Endurance in Normal Vision via Virtual Reality-Integrated Eye Tracking</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/49</link>
	<description>Modern societies are becoming increasingly dependent on electronics, leading to an increase in visual symptoms. Vergence endurance, the ability to sustain performance, may serve as a quantitative metric to complement symptom surveys to assess vergence performance during near visual tasks. To quantify vergence endurance, 48 participants, aged 15 to 23 years with normal binocular vision, completed a 15 min symmetrical disparity vergence step task to assess potential changes in peak vergence speed over the course of the experiment. Peak velocity, final amplitude, and the slope of the linear regression fit of the peak velocity as a function of stimulus recording were quantified for convergence and divergence responses using an eye tracker integrated in a virtual reality headset. Peak velocity was sustained by 63% and 69% of participants for convergence and divergence eye movements, respectively. Convergence and divergence responses were significantly different for peak velocity (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001) and vergence endurance (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.03). The endurance metric tool has potential that may help shape future clinical applications for those with acquired brain injuries, including concussions or neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis or Parkinson&amp;amp;rsquo;s disease.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-05</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 49: Oculomotor Vergence Eye Movement Endurance in Normal Vision via Virtual Reality-Integrated Eye Tracking</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/49">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030049</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Fatema F. Hirani
		Farzin Hajebrahimi
		Tara L. Alvarez
		</p>
	<p>Modern societies are becoming increasingly dependent on electronics, leading to an increase in visual symptoms. Vergence endurance, the ability to sustain performance, may serve as a quantitative metric to complement symptom surveys to assess vergence performance during near visual tasks. To quantify vergence endurance, 48 participants, aged 15 to 23 years with normal binocular vision, completed a 15 min symmetrical disparity vergence step task to assess potential changes in peak vergence speed over the course of the experiment. Peak velocity, final amplitude, and the slope of the linear regression fit of the peak velocity as a function of stimulus recording were quantified for convergence and divergence responses using an eye tracker integrated in a virtual reality headset. Peak velocity was sustained by 63% and 69% of participants for convergence and divergence eye movements, respectively. Convergence and divergence responses were significantly different for peak velocity (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001) and vergence endurance (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.03). The endurance metric tool has potential that may help shape future clinical applications for those with acquired brain injuries, including concussions or neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis or Parkinson&amp;amp;rsquo;s disease.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Oculomotor Vergence Eye Movement Endurance in Normal Vision via Virtual Reality-Integrated Eye Tracking</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Fatema F. Hirani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Farzin Hajebrahimi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tara L. Alvarez</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030049</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-05</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>49</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030049</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/49</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/48">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 48: Effects of Driving Task Demands and Information Load on AR-HUD Cognitive Efficiency: The Moderating Role of Working Memory Capacity in a VR-Based Simulated Driving Environment</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/48</link>
	<description>The driving scenario and information load jointly influence the cognitive efficiency of augmented reality head-up display (AR-HUD) interfaces. However, the moderating role of drivers’ working memory capacity (WMC) remains unclear. To investigate this mechanism, a simulated driving experiment with a mixed design was conducted in a low-immersivity desktop virtual reality (VR) environment. First, 40 volunteers were screened using an automated operation span task, yielding 16 high- and low-WMC participants. They then drove under three scenarios (urban intersection, expressway, construction zone) and six levels of AR-HUD visual information load. Generalized linear models were applied to the reaction time, fixation duration, and pupil diameter. The results revealed a significant three-way interaction among WMC, scenario, and information load. High-WMC drivers maintained faster responses and lower subjective loads up to Levels 4–6, adopting a deep processing strategy; low-WMC drivers already showed cognitive overload at Level 4 and above, requiring an optimal load range of Level 2–3. The construction zone induced the steepest increase in cognitive load, whereas the expressway markedly reduced sensitivity to additional visual information. Therefore, the optimal AR-HUD information load must be adapted to drivers’ WMC: high-WMC drivers can safely handle Levels 4–6 in low- or medium-demand scenarios, whereas low-WMC drivers require a minimalist presentation of Levels 2–3 in high-demand situations. This study provides quantitative, empirically grounded guidelines for designing cognitively adaptive AR-HUD interfaces.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-03</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 48: Effects of Driving Task Demands and Information Load on AR-HUD Cognitive Efficiency: The Moderating Role of Working Memory Capacity in a VR-Based Simulated Driving Environment</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/48">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030048</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Jing Li
		Min Lin
		Xinyu Feng
		Hua Zhang
		Chuchu Wang
		Yulian Ma
		</p>
	<p>The driving scenario and information load jointly influence the cognitive efficiency of augmented reality head-up display (AR-HUD) interfaces. However, the moderating role of drivers’ working memory capacity (WMC) remains unclear. To investigate this mechanism, a simulated driving experiment with a mixed design was conducted in a low-immersivity desktop virtual reality (VR) environment. First, 40 volunteers were screened using an automated operation span task, yielding 16 high- and low-WMC participants. They then drove under three scenarios (urban intersection, expressway, construction zone) and six levels of AR-HUD visual information load. Generalized linear models were applied to the reaction time, fixation duration, and pupil diameter. The results revealed a significant three-way interaction among WMC, scenario, and information load. High-WMC drivers maintained faster responses and lower subjective loads up to Levels 4–6, adopting a deep processing strategy; low-WMC drivers already showed cognitive overload at Level 4 and above, requiring an optimal load range of Level 2–3. The construction zone induced the steepest increase in cognitive load, whereas the expressway markedly reduced sensitivity to additional visual information. Therefore, the optimal AR-HUD information load must be adapted to drivers’ WMC: high-WMC drivers can safely handle Levels 4–6 in low- or medium-demand scenarios, whereas low-WMC drivers require a minimalist presentation of Levels 2–3 in high-demand situations. This study provides quantitative, empirically grounded guidelines for designing cognitively adaptive AR-HUD interfaces.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Effects of Driving Task Demands and Information Load on AR-HUD Cognitive Efficiency: The Moderating Role of Working Memory Capacity in a VR-Based Simulated Driving Environment</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Jing Li</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Min Lin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xinyu Feng</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hua Zhang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Chuchu Wang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yulian Ma</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030048</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-03</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>48</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030048</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/48</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/47">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 47: Differential Fixation and Eye Alignment Patterns in Strabismus with and Without Amblyopia Across Viewing Conditions</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/47</link>
	<description>Fixation instability (FI) and vergence instability (VI) in amblyopia and strabismus are associated with disrupted physiologic fixation eye movements (FEMs). This study examined how viewing conditions affect FEM patterns in strabismic subjects with and without amblyopia. FEMs of the non-dominant/amblyopic and dominant/fellow eyes were recorded using video-oculography during both-eye viewing (BEV), fellow/dominant-eye viewing (FEV/DEV), and amblyopic/non-dominant-eye viewing (AEV/NDEV) in strabismic subjects with amblyopia (SA, n = 56), without amblyopia (S, n = 19), and controls (C, n = 25). FI, VI, fast FEM amplitudes, slow FEM velocities, and time-based control of eye deviation were analyzed. The SA group showed the greatest FI in the amblyopic eye during AEV compared with the fellow eye during FEV, whereas minimal inter-ocular FI differences were observed in the S group and controls. Under monocular viewing, both SA and S groups exhibited increased FI in the non-viewing eye and higher VI than controls. Regression analyses indicated that visual acuity deficits primarily influenced viewing-eye FI and FEM dynamics, while strabismus mainly affected non-viewing-eye FI and slow FEMs. C and S groups showed the least eye deviation during BEV, whereas the SA group showed the least eye deviation&amp;amp;mdash;but the highest VI&amp;amp;mdash;during AEV, indicating a distinct pattern of incomitance. Distinct FEM patterns shaped by viewing conditions may reflect underlying visuomotor control mechanisms and serve as biomarkers for AI (artificial intelligence)-based classification.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-03</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 47: Differential Fixation and Eye Alignment Patterns in Strabismus with and Without Amblyopia Across Viewing Conditions</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/47">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030047</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Archayeeta Rakshit
		Ibrahim M. Quagraine
		Gokce Busra Cakir
		Aasef G. Shaikh
		Fatema F. Ghasia
		</p>
	<p>Fixation instability (FI) and vergence instability (VI) in amblyopia and strabismus are associated with disrupted physiologic fixation eye movements (FEMs). This study examined how viewing conditions affect FEM patterns in strabismic subjects with and without amblyopia. FEMs of the non-dominant/amblyopic and dominant/fellow eyes were recorded using video-oculography during both-eye viewing (BEV), fellow/dominant-eye viewing (FEV/DEV), and amblyopic/non-dominant-eye viewing (AEV/NDEV) in strabismic subjects with amblyopia (SA, n = 56), without amblyopia (S, n = 19), and controls (C, n = 25). FI, VI, fast FEM amplitudes, slow FEM velocities, and time-based control of eye deviation were analyzed. The SA group showed the greatest FI in the amblyopic eye during AEV compared with the fellow eye during FEV, whereas minimal inter-ocular FI differences were observed in the S group and controls. Under monocular viewing, both SA and S groups exhibited increased FI in the non-viewing eye and higher VI than controls. Regression analyses indicated that visual acuity deficits primarily influenced viewing-eye FI and FEM dynamics, while strabismus mainly affected non-viewing-eye FI and slow FEMs. C and S groups showed the least eye deviation during BEV, whereas the SA group showed the least eye deviation&amp;amp;mdash;but the highest VI&amp;amp;mdash;during AEV, indicating a distinct pattern of incomitance. Distinct FEM patterns shaped by viewing conditions may reflect underlying visuomotor control mechanisms and serve as biomarkers for AI (artificial intelligence)-based classification.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Differential Fixation and Eye Alignment Patterns in Strabismus with and Without Amblyopia Across Viewing Conditions</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Archayeeta Rakshit</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ibrahim M. Quagraine</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gokce Busra Cakir</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Aasef G. Shaikh</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Fatema F. Ghasia</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030047</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-03</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>47</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030047</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/47</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/46">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 46: Oculometric Function More Strongly Predicts Working Memory than Stress in Military Officers</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/46</link>
	<description>Working memory, the capacity to store information for near-immediate use, and visual attention, the ability to focus on task-relevant information, are integral skills for military personnel. In civilian populations, stress is associated with worse skills. However, little is known about the relationship between stress, working memory, and visual attention in military officers, who are trained to handle acute stress and operate in high-stress environments. Thirty-three military officers completed a working memory test, a Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ), and an oculometric assessment of visual tracking. The oculometric test was a modified step-ramp test that produces 10 z-scored metrics. Working memory and executive function were assessed via the n-back task. Oculometric performance and self-reported stress levels were independently associated with n-back accuracy, explaining 67% of the variance (adjusted R2, n = 30). The association between oculometric performance and n-back accuracy was driven by directional anisotropy, directional noise and proportion of smooth pursuit. The association between oculometric performance and stress was complicated by sex differences. Results have important implications for the assessment of cognitive readiness in military populations. The strong relationship between oculometric performance and working memory suggests that eye-tracking-based metrics may serve as candidate indicators of cognitive function under operational demands.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-02</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 46: Oculometric Function More Strongly Predicts Working Memory than Stress in Military Officers</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/46">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030046</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Mollie McGuire
		Neda Bahrani
		Quinn Kennedy
		Dorion Liston
		</p>
	<p>Working memory, the capacity to store information for near-immediate use, and visual attention, the ability to focus on task-relevant information, are integral skills for military personnel. In civilian populations, stress is associated with worse skills. However, little is known about the relationship between stress, working memory, and visual attention in military officers, who are trained to handle acute stress and operate in high-stress environments. Thirty-three military officers completed a working memory test, a Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ), and an oculometric assessment of visual tracking. The oculometric test was a modified step-ramp test that produces 10 z-scored metrics. Working memory and executive function were assessed via the n-back task. Oculometric performance and self-reported stress levels were independently associated with n-back accuracy, explaining 67% of the variance (adjusted R2, n = 30). The association between oculometric performance and n-back accuracy was driven by directional anisotropy, directional noise and proportion of smooth pursuit. The association between oculometric performance and stress was complicated by sex differences. Results have important implications for the assessment of cognitive readiness in military populations. The strong relationship between oculometric performance and working memory suggests that eye-tracking-based metrics may serve as candidate indicators of cognitive function under operational demands.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Oculometric Function More Strongly Predicts Working Memory than Stress in Military Officers</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Mollie McGuire</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Neda Bahrani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Quinn Kennedy</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Dorion Liston</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030046</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-02</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-02</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>46</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030046</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/46</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/45">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 45: Effects of Cognitive, Simulator, and Real-World Training on Novice Driver Gaze Behaviour: A Pre&amp;ndash;Post Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/45</link>
	<description>Novice drivers demonstrate inefficient visual scanning and elevated crash risk relative to experienced drivers. Different training programmes may influence gaze behaviour and performance in distinct ways. This study compared the impact of cognitive, simulator-based, and real-world training on visual attention and driving-related outcomes in novice drivers. Thirty novice drivers (18&amp;amp;ndash;27 years; &amp;amp;le;1 year driving experience) were randomized into three training groups (n = 10 each): cognitive training (PsyToolkit, Version 3.7.0), game-based simulator training, and supervised real-world driving. Baseline and post-training assessments included visuomotor performance (Fitts&amp;amp;rsquo; Law), attentional cueing (valid/invalid reaction time), simulator-based driving errors, and eye-tracking measures of gaze behaviour. Eye-tracking outcomes included dwell-time percentage and first-fixation order across predefined areas of interest (AOIs). Participants completed 10 consecutive days of modality-specific training. Cognitive training improved visuomotor performance and increased forward road monitoring. Game-based simulator training yielded the largest reductions in simulator driving errors, particularly lane deviations (Z = &amp;amp;minus;2.89, p = 0.004). Real-world driving altered visual scanning patterns, with significant differences in rear-view mirror prioritization (p = 0.024). Across groups, gaze shifted from dashboard view toward safety-relevant AOIs. Training modifies novice drivers&amp;amp;rsquo; gaze behaviour in modality-specific ways, suggesting that a multimodal training approach may enhance visual attention and driving safety</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-30</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 45: Effects of Cognitive, Simulator, and Real-World Training on Novice Driver Gaze Behaviour: A Pre&amp;ndash;Post Study</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/45">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030045</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Prem Sudhakar Lawrence
		Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan
		</p>
	<p>Novice drivers demonstrate inefficient visual scanning and elevated crash risk relative to experienced drivers. Different training programmes may influence gaze behaviour and performance in distinct ways. This study compared the impact of cognitive, simulator-based, and real-world training on visual attention and driving-related outcomes in novice drivers. Thirty novice drivers (18&amp;amp;ndash;27 years; &amp;amp;le;1 year driving experience) were randomized into three training groups (n = 10 each): cognitive training (PsyToolkit, Version 3.7.0), game-based simulator training, and supervised real-world driving. Baseline and post-training assessments included visuomotor performance (Fitts&amp;amp;rsquo; Law), attentional cueing (valid/invalid reaction time), simulator-based driving errors, and eye-tracking measures of gaze behaviour. Eye-tracking outcomes included dwell-time percentage and first-fixation order across predefined areas of interest (AOIs). Participants completed 10 consecutive days of modality-specific training. Cognitive training improved visuomotor performance and increased forward road monitoring. Game-based simulator training yielded the largest reductions in simulator driving errors, particularly lane deviations (Z = &amp;amp;minus;2.89, p = 0.004). Real-world driving altered visual scanning patterns, with significant differences in rear-view mirror prioritization (p = 0.024). Across groups, gaze shifted from dashboard view toward safety-relevant AOIs. Training modifies novice drivers&amp;amp;rsquo; gaze behaviour in modality-specific ways, suggesting that a multimodal training approach may enhance visual attention and driving safety</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Effects of Cognitive, Simulator, and Real-World Training on Novice Driver Gaze Behaviour: A Pre&amp;amp;ndash;Post Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Prem Sudhakar Lawrence</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030045</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-30</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>45</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030045</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/45</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/44">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 44: Validating Temporal Eye Tracking Metrics as Orthogonal Biomarkers for Aggressive Traits: A Mixed-Effects Analysis</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/44</link>
	<description>Atypical visual attention to aversive or threatening stimuli is a clinically relevant feature of aggressive behavior. However, the developmental dissociation between sustained visual allocation and early orienting remains unclear. This study examined the temporal dynamics of visual attentional biases in a sample of 119 children and adolescents (51 males, 68 females), clinically and behaviorally categorized into aggressive and non-aggressive cohorts. Using a free-viewing paradigm with standardized emotional stimulus pairs selected from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), eye-tracking analysis focused on first-fixation direction and dwell time. Inferential analyses were conducted using Linear Mixed-Effect Models (LMM) and Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models (GLMM). The linear model revealed a significant main effect of behavioral condition: individuals with aggressive traits, regardless of their stage of development, showed greater sustained visual allocation toward negative stimuli. In contrast, the GLMM for first-fixation direction identified a significant age-by-condition interaction, indicating that early orienting differences were more clearly expressed in the aggressive adolescent cohort. These findings suggest that sustained visual preference for negative content may represent a relatively stable correlate of aggressive traits, whereas early orienting differences may vary across developmental stages. Together, these two temporal eye-tracking measures may provide complementary information for future computational approaches to aggression screening. In conclusion, these two temporal oculomotor dimensions may provide a useful feature space for future machine-learning pipelines and may serve as complementary candidate markers for comparing computational predictions against clinically established ground truth in aggression screening research.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-28</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 44: Validating Temporal Eye Tracking Metrics as Orthogonal Biomarkers for Aggressive Traits: A Mixed-Effects Analysis</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/44">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030044</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Omar Alvarado-Cando
		Oscar Casanova-Carvajal
		José-Javier Serrano-Olmedo
		</p>
	<p>Atypical visual attention to aversive or threatening stimuli is a clinically relevant feature of aggressive behavior. However, the developmental dissociation between sustained visual allocation and early orienting remains unclear. This study examined the temporal dynamics of visual attentional biases in a sample of 119 children and adolescents (51 males, 68 females), clinically and behaviorally categorized into aggressive and non-aggressive cohorts. Using a free-viewing paradigm with standardized emotional stimulus pairs selected from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), eye-tracking analysis focused on first-fixation direction and dwell time. Inferential analyses were conducted using Linear Mixed-Effect Models (LMM) and Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models (GLMM). The linear model revealed a significant main effect of behavioral condition: individuals with aggressive traits, regardless of their stage of development, showed greater sustained visual allocation toward negative stimuli. In contrast, the GLMM for first-fixation direction identified a significant age-by-condition interaction, indicating that early orienting differences were more clearly expressed in the aggressive adolescent cohort. These findings suggest that sustained visual preference for negative content may represent a relatively stable correlate of aggressive traits, whereas early orienting differences may vary across developmental stages. Together, these two temporal eye-tracking measures may provide complementary information for future computational approaches to aggression screening. In conclusion, these two temporal oculomotor dimensions may provide a useful feature space for future machine-learning pipelines and may serve as complementary candidate markers for comparing computational predictions against clinically established ground truth in aggression screening research.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Validating Temporal Eye Tracking Metrics as Orthogonal Biomarkers for Aggressive Traits: A Mixed-Effects Analysis</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Omar Alvarado-Cando</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Oscar Casanova-Carvajal</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>José-Javier Serrano-Olmedo</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030044</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-28</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>44</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030044</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/44</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/43">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 43: Reversible Orbital Apex Syndrome</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/43</link>
	<description>Orbital apex syndrome (OAS) is characterized by optic neuropathy and ophthalmoplegia and is generally associated with poor visual prognosis. The aim of this study was to describe patients with acute OAS who demonstrated substantial recovery of visual function and ocular motility. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients treated for OAS at a tertiary medical center between 2019 and 2024 whose condition ultimately proved reversible. Data on demographics, clinical findings, imaging, management, and follow-up were collected. Six patients (three female, three male; age range 14&amp;amp;ndash;87 years) were included and followed for a median follow-up of 7 months (range 2&amp;amp;ndash;31). All presented with reduced vision and ophthalmoplegia of varying severity. Underlying etiologies included inflammatory disease (n = 2), lymphoma, infection, blunt trauma, and post-surgical OAS of undetermined etiology (n = 1 each). Treatment was directed at the underlying cause. Visual acuity ranged from 20/30 to hand motion (HM) at presentation and 20/15 to 20/60 at the final visit. Improvement in vision and ocular motility occurred after a median time to clinical improvement of 2.37 months (range 0.25&amp;amp;ndash;5 months). Near-complete recovery of ocular motility was observed in all patients, with only one retaining mild abduction limitation. These findings highlight a subset of OAS cases with favorable outcomes and emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and etiology-directed management.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-27</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 43: Reversible Orbital Apex Syndrome</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/43">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030043</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Yakov Rabinovich
		Inbal Man Peles
		Zina Almer
		Iris Ben Bassat-Mizrachi
		Jonathan Sapir
		Noa Hadar
		Alon Zahavi
		Nitza Goldenberg-Cohen
		</p>
	<p>Orbital apex syndrome (OAS) is characterized by optic neuropathy and ophthalmoplegia and is generally associated with poor visual prognosis. The aim of this study was to describe patients with acute OAS who demonstrated substantial recovery of visual function and ocular motility. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients treated for OAS at a tertiary medical center between 2019 and 2024 whose condition ultimately proved reversible. Data on demographics, clinical findings, imaging, management, and follow-up were collected. Six patients (three female, three male; age range 14&amp;amp;ndash;87 years) were included and followed for a median follow-up of 7 months (range 2&amp;amp;ndash;31). All presented with reduced vision and ophthalmoplegia of varying severity. Underlying etiologies included inflammatory disease (n = 2), lymphoma, infection, blunt trauma, and post-surgical OAS of undetermined etiology (n = 1 each). Treatment was directed at the underlying cause. Visual acuity ranged from 20/30 to hand motion (HM) at presentation and 20/15 to 20/60 at the final visit. Improvement in vision and ocular motility occurred after a median time to clinical improvement of 2.37 months (range 0.25&amp;amp;ndash;5 months). Near-complete recovery of ocular motility was observed in all patients, with only one retaining mild abduction limitation. These findings highlight a subset of OAS cases with favorable outcomes and emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and etiology-directed management.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Reversible Orbital Apex Syndrome</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Yakov Rabinovich</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Inbal Man Peles</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zina Almer</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Iris Ben Bassat-Mizrachi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jonathan Sapir</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Noa Hadar</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alon Zahavi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nitza Goldenberg-Cohen</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030043</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-27</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>43</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030043</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/43</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/42">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 42: Eye-Tracking-Based Interventions for School-Age Specific Learning Disorders: A Narrative Review of Functional Assessment and Gaze-Contingent Training</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/42</link>
	<description>Eye tracking (ET) provides process-level indices of how students sample task-relevant information during core academic activities. In school-age learners (6&amp;amp;ndash;18 years) with specific learning disorders (SLDs; dyslexia, dysgraphia, and dyscalculia), ET can complement behavioural assessment by quantifying oculomotor patterns linked to decoding, model&amp;amp;ndash;production coordination, and stepwise strategy execution. This narrative review synthesises ET findings in SLD across reading, handwriting/copying, and arithmetic and translates them into an applied framework for school-oriented use. We summarise key metrics and Areas of Interest (AOI)-based analyses, highlight technical and data-quality requirements for valid acquisition in educational settings, and outline compact functional assessment protocols integrated with standard academic and neuropsychological measures. Building on these foundations, we propose six hypothesis-driven gaze-contingent paradigms (H1&amp;amp;ndash;H6) as preliminary models for future experimental testing rather than as established interventions, and we map each to its current level of empirical support, specifying primary gaze outcomes and curriculum-relevant behavioural endpoints. We emphasise that eye-movement findings in specific learning disorders are heterogeneous and may vary as a function of age, task demands, and comorbidity. Accordingly, credible training effects require retention and transfer probes under standard, non-contingent display conditions, appropriate controls, and explicit developmental interpretation. Eye tracking is positioned as complementary functional evidence and as a platform for experimentally testable, mechanism-based interventions in school-age specific learning disorders.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-24</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 42: Eye-Tracking-Based Interventions for School-Age Specific Learning Disorders: A Narrative Review of Functional Assessment and Gaze-Contingent Training</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/42">doi: 10.3390/jemr19030042</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Pierluigi Diotaiuti
		Francesco Di Siena
		Salvatore Vitiello
		Alessandra Zanon
		Pio Alfredo Di Tore
		Stefania Mancone
		</p>
	<p>Eye tracking (ET) provides process-level indices of how students sample task-relevant information during core academic activities. In school-age learners (6&amp;amp;ndash;18 years) with specific learning disorders (SLDs; dyslexia, dysgraphia, and dyscalculia), ET can complement behavioural assessment by quantifying oculomotor patterns linked to decoding, model&amp;amp;ndash;production coordination, and stepwise strategy execution. This narrative review synthesises ET findings in SLD across reading, handwriting/copying, and arithmetic and translates them into an applied framework for school-oriented use. We summarise key metrics and Areas of Interest (AOI)-based analyses, highlight technical and data-quality requirements for valid acquisition in educational settings, and outline compact functional assessment protocols integrated with standard academic and neuropsychological measures. Building on these foundations, we propose six hypothesis-driven gaze-contingent paradigms (H1&amp;amp;ndash;H6) as preliminary models for future experimental testing rather than as established interventions, and we map each to its current level of empirical support, specifying primary gaze outcomes and curriculum-relevant behavioural endpoints. We emphasise that eye-movement findings in specific learning disorders are heterogeneous and may vary as a function of age, task demands, and comorbidity. Accordingly, credible training effects require retention and transfer probes under standard, non-contingent display conditions, appropriate controls, and explicit developmental interpretation. Eye tracking is positioned as complementary functional evidence and as a platform for experimentally testable, mechanism-based interventions in school-age specific learning disorders.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Eye-Tracking-Based Interventions for School-Age Specific Learning Disorders: A Narrative Review of Functional Assessment and Gaze-Contingent Training</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Pierluigi Diotaiuti</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Francesco Di Siena</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Salvatore Vitiello</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alessandra Zanon</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Pio Alfredo Di Tore</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stefania Mancone</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19030042</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-24</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>42</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19030042</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/3/42</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/41">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 41: Data-Driven Insights into E-Learning: A Comprehensive Review of Eye-Tracking Applications in Learning Systems</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/41</link>
	<description>In the last few years, universities have increasingly implemented online learning environments, allowing students to study at their own pace. These environments utilize technological tools and implement methods to support training, deliver content, and promote the acquisition of new knowledge and skills. As an example of these technologies, eye tracking has emerged as a powerful tool for studying visual attention, cognitive processes, and learning behaviors. The main aim of this study is to provide a scoping review of recent eye-tracking research across diverse learner populations, ranging from K-12 students to university-level learners and educators. The present study examined recent advances in eye-tracking technologies, focusing on their potential, especially when combined with artificial intelligence (AI) techniques such as machine learning. It analyzed 54 empirical studies in the last few years, highlighting their applicability, strengths, and limitations. The research findings highlight the promise of eye-tracking technology to transform educational practices by providing data-driven insights regarding student behavior and cognitive processes. Future research must address implementation and data-analysis challenges to maximize the educational benefits of eye tracking.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-17</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 41: Data-Driven Insights into E-Learning: A Comprehensive Review of Eye-Tracking Applications in Learning Systems</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/41">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020041</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Safia Bendjebar
		Yacine Lafifi
		Rochdi Boudjehem
		Aissa Laouissi
		</p>
	<p>In the last few years, universities have increasingly implemented online learning environments, allowing students to study at their own pace. These environments utilize technological tools and implement methods to support training, deliver content, and promote the acquisition of new knowledge and skills. As an example of these technologies, eye tracking has emerged as a powerful tool for studying visual attention, cognitive processes, and learning behaviors. The main aim of this study is to provide a scoping review of recent eye-tracking research across diverse learner populations, ranging from K-12 students to university-level learners and educators. The present study examined recent advances in eye-tracking technologies, focusing on their potential, especially when combined with artificial intelligence (AI) techniques such as machine learning. It analyzed 54 empirical studies in the last few years, highlighting their applicability, strengths, and limitations. The research findings highlight the promise of eye-tracking technology to transform educational practices by providing data-driven insights regarding student behavior and cognitive processes. Future research must address implementation and data-analysis challenges to maximize the educational benefits of eye tracking.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Data-Driven Insights into E-Learning: A Comprehensive Review of Eye-Tracking Applications in Learning Systems</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Safia Bendjebar</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yacine Lafifi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rochdi Boudjehem</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Aissa Laouissi</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020041</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-17</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>41</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020041</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/41</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/40">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 40: Application of Eye-Tracking Technology in Assessing Binocular Vision Function in Paediatric Populations: A Scoping Review</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/40</link>
	<description>Background: This review discusses the application of eye-tracking technology in the detection and monitoring of binocular vision anomalies among children. Methods: A scoping review using PRISMA guidelines was conducted through Scopus, ScienceDirect, and PubMed using the keywords “eye-tracking,” “binocular,” “vision,” “anomalies,” “paediatrics,” and “children” from 2015 to 2025. Studies excluded were not written in English, did not apply the eye tracker as a research tool, involved an ineligible population, or involved non-human subjects. Results: The search strategy identified 77 citations, yet only 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. This review revealed a variety of binocular vision anomalies detectable through eye-tracking systems, along with the specific models and parameters employed in these assessments. Application of eye-tracking technology in diagnosing conditions such as strabismus and amblyopia demonstrated potential for improved accuracy and early detection. Discussion: Eye-tracking technology demonstrates considerable potential for the detection and monitoring of binocular vision anomalies in children, particularly as a non-invasive method for early screening, thereby strengthening its clinical applicability. By assessing fixation stability, saccadic movements, and vergence responses, eye-tracking allows for the early detection of subtle visual anomalies, especially in the paediatric population. Conclusions: Eye-tracking technology represents a valuable advancement in paediatric vision care, enabling the more objective and earlier detection of binocular vision anomalies in the paediatric population.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-17</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 40: Application of Eye-Tracking Technology in Assessing Binocular Vision Function in Paediatric Populations: A Scoping Review</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/40">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020040</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Ong Koon
		Noor Badarudin
		Byoung-Sun Chu
		</p>
	<p>Background: This review discusses the application of eye-tracking technology in the detection and monitoring of binocular vision anomalies among children. Methods: A scoping review using PRISMA guidelines was conducted through Scopus, ScienceDirect, and PubMed using the keywords “eye-tracking,” “binocular,” “vision,” “anomalies,” “paediatrics,” and “children” from 2015 to 2025. Studies excluded were not written in English, did not apply the eye tracker as a research tool, involved an ineligible population, or involved non-human subjects. Results: The search strategy identified 77 citations, yet only 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. This review revealed a variety of binocular vision anomalies detectable through eye-tracking systems, along with the specific models and parameters employed in these assessments. Application of eye-tracking technology in diagnosing conditions such as strabismus and amblyopia demonstrated potential for improved accuracy and early detection. Discussion: Eye-tracking technology demonstrates considerable potential for the detection and monitoring of binocular vision anomalies in children, particularly as a non-invasive method for early screening, thereby strengthening its clinical applicability. By assessing fixation stability, saccadic movements, and vergence responses, eye-tracking allows for the early detection of subtle visual anomalies, especially in the paediatric population. Conclusions: Eye-tracking technology represents a valuable advancement in paediatric vision care, enabling the more objective and earlier detection of binocular vision anomalies in the paediatric population.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Application of Eye-Tracking Technology in Assessing Binocular Vision Function in Paediatric Populations: A Scoping Review</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Ong Koon</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Noor Badarudin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Byoung-Sun Chu</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020040</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-17</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>40</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020040</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/40</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/39">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 39: Virtual Reality Orthoptic Interventions for Binocular Vision Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/39</link>
	<description>Purpose: To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating digital orthoptic interventions, including virtual reality (VR)&amp;amp;ndash;based approaches, for convergence insufficiency and intermittent exotropia. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and AMSTAR-2 standards and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to December 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing VR-based or digital orthoptic interventions with conventional therapy, placebo VR, or control conditions. Primary outcomes included near point of convergence, ocular deviation, fusional reserves, and stereopsis. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and certainty of evidence with GRADE. Results: Four RCTs (184 participants) were included. In convergence insufficiency, digital orthoptic interventions, including VR-based approaches, significantly reduced near heterophoria (mean difference [MD] &amp;amp;minus;1.64 prism diopters; 95% CI &amp;amp;minus;3.17 to &amp;amp;minus;0.12), with no significant effects on near point of convergence or positive fusional reserves. In intermittent exotropia, VR-based interventions significantly improved near point of convergence (MD &amp;amp;minus;1.60 cm; 95% CI &amp;amp;minus;2.64 to &amp;amp;minus;0.55), although this change did not reach the &amp;amp;ge;4 cm threshold considered clinically meaningful according to the Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial. Improvements were also observed in stereopsis (MD &amp;amp;minus;0.19 log units; 95% CI &amp;amp;minus;0.33 to &amp;amp;minus;0.04), while changes in near deviation were not significant. Evidence certainty ranged from low to moderate. Conclusions: VR-based and digital orthoptic interventions may offer modest, outcome-specific benefits as adjunctive treatments for selected binocular vision disorders. Larger, well-designed RCTs with standardized outcomes are needed.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-14</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 39: Virtual Reality Orthoptic Interventions for Binocular Vision Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/39">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020039</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Clara Martinez-Perez
		Noelia Nores-Palmas
		Jacobo Garcia-Queiruga
		Maria J. Giraldez
		Eva Yebra-Pimentel
		</p>
	<p>Purpose: To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating digital orthoptic interventions, including virtual reality (VR)&amp;amp;ndash;based approaches, for convergence insufficiency and intermittent exotropia. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and AMSTAR-2 standards and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to December 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing VR-based or digital orthoptic interventions with conventional therapy, placebo VR, or control conditions. Primary outcomes included near point of convergence, ocular deviation, fusional reserves, and stereopsis. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and certainty of evidence with GRADE. Results: Four RCTs (184 participants) were included. In convergence insufficiency, digital orthoptic interventions, including VR-based approaches, significantly reduced near heterophoria (mean difference [MD] &amp;amp;minus;1.64 prism diopters; 95% CI &amp;amp;minus;3.17 to &amp;amp;minus;0.12), with no significant effects on near point of convergence or positive fusional reserves. In intermittent exotropia, VR-based interventions significantly improved near point of convergence (MD &amp;amp;minus;1.60 cm; 95% CI &amp;amp;minus;2.64 to &amp;amp;minus;0.55), although this change did not reach the &amp;amp;ge;4 cm threshold considered clinically meaningful according to the Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial. Improvements were also observed in stereopsis (MD &amp;amp;minus;0.19 log units; 95% CI &amp;amp;minus;0.33 to &amp;amp;minus;0.04), while changes in near deviation were not significant. Evidence certainty ranged from low to moderate. Conclusions: VR-based and digital orthoptic interventions may offer modest, outcome-specific benefits as adjunctive treatments for selected binocular vision disorders. Larger, well-designed RCTs with standardized outcomes are needed.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Virtual Reality Orthoptic Interventions for Binocular Vision Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Clara Martinez-Perez</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Noelia Nores-Palmas</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jacobo Garcia-Queiruga</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Maria J. Giraldez</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Eva Yebra-Pimentel</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020039</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-14</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-14</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Systematic Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>39</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020039</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/39</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/38">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 38: Eye-Tracked Visual Attention to Anthropomorphic Appearance and Empathic Responses in AI Medical Conversational Agents: Dissociating Trust Gains from Attentional Synergy</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/38</link>
	<description>Understanding how users perceive and attend to the anthropomorphic appearance and empathic responses of artificial intelligence medical conversational agents (AIMCAs) can help reveal the key judgment cues underlying trust formation and use decisions, while also informing interface and dialog design. To this end, this study employs a 3 (appearance anthropomorphism: high, medium, low) &amp;amp;times; 2 (empathic response: present, absent) within-subject eye-tracking experiment, combined with subjective scales and brief post-task open-ended feedback. During a static prototype viewing task based on hypothetical consultation scenarios, we concurrently recorded trust, behavioral intention, and visual measures for key areas of interest (AOIs; appearance area, conversational content area, and overall interface area). Eye-tracking measures were normalized by AOI coverage proportion to improve cross-AOI comparability. The results show that both anthropomorphic appearance and empathic response significantly increased users&amp;amp;rsquo; trust in AIMCAs and their behavioral intention. An interaction between these two types of social cues was also observed, suggesting that when visual embodiment and linguistic style are aligned at the social level, users are more likely to form favorable overall judgments. At the level of visual processing, however, no interaction effect was found, and the eye-tracking measures showed only partial main effects, indicating that subjective synergy does not necessarily correspond to synergistic changes in attentional allocation. Overall, anthropomorphic appearance and empathic response exerted consistent facilitating effects on outcome variables, but displayed different patterns of attentional allocation and information prioritization at the visual level. Accordingly, AIMCA design should emphasize consistency between appearance cues and conversational strategies, optimize users&amp;amp;rsquo; initial judgments and interface comprehension, and use intention through verifiable information organization and clear boundary cues.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-09</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 38: Eye-Tracked Visual Attention to Anthropomorphic Appearance and Empathic Responses in AI Medical Conversational Agents: Dissociating Trust Gains from Attentional Synergy</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/38">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020038</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Wumin Ouyang
		Hemin Du
		Yong Han
		Zihuan Wang
		Yuyu He
		</p>
	<p>Understanding how users perceive and attend to the anthropomorphic appearance and empathic responses of artificial intelligence medical conversational agents (AIMCAs) can help reveal the key judgment cues underlying trust formation and use decisions, while also informing interface and dialog design. To this end, this study employs a 3 (appearance anthropomorphism: high, medium, low) &amp;amp;times; 2 (empathic response: present, absent) within-subject eye-tracking experiment, combined with subjective scales and brief post-task open-ended feedback. During a static prototype viewing task based on hypothetical consultation scenarios, we concurrently recorded trust, behavioral intention, and visual measures for key areas of interest (AOIs; appearance area, conversational content area, and overall interface area). Eye-tracking measures were normalized by AOI coverage proportion to improve cross-AOI comparability. The results show that both anthropomorphic appearance and empathic response significantly increased users&amp;amp;rsquo; trust in AIMCAs and their behavioral intention. An interaction between these two types of social cues was also observed, suggesting that when visual embodiment and linguistic style are aligned at the social level, users are more likely to form favorable overall judgments. At the level of visual processing, however, no interaction effect was found, and the eye-tracking measures showed only partial main effects, indicating that subjective synergy does not necessarily correspond to synergistic changes in attentional allocation. Overall, anthropomorphic appearance and empathic response exerted consistent facilitating effects on outcome variables, but displayed different patterns of attentional allocation and information prioritization at the visual level. Accordingly, AIMCA design should emphasize consistency between appearance cues and conversational strategies, optimize users&amp;amp;rsquo; initial judgments and interface comprehension, and use intention through verifiable information organization and clear boundary cues.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Eye-Tracked Visual Attention to Anthropomorphic Appearance and Empathic Responses in AI Medical Conversational Agents: Dissociating Trust Gains from Attentional Synergy</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Wumin Ouyang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hemin Du</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yong Han</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zihuan Wang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yuyu He</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020038</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-09</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-09</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>38</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020038</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/38</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/37">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 37: Simplifying the Diagnosis of Vertical Diplopia: Is It Skew or Not?</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/37</link>
	<description>Ocular tilt reaction (OTR) and trochlear nerve palsy (TNP) can induce cyclotorsion. We aimed to assess the utility of fundus photography in distinguishing between these disorders. The database of a neuro-ophthalmology hospital-based clinic was retrospectively searched for patients referred for new-onset vertical diplopia between 2020 and 2023. Medical data were collected, and the angle between the optic disc and fovea was measured using ImageJ software to quantify torsion. Distinct torsional patterns were identified between the groups. OTR was characterized by variable, often conjugate torsion, whereas TNP demonstrated consistent disconjugate extorsion. Analysis of interocular torsional relationships, rather than magnitude alone, provided useful diagnostic discrimination. Fundus photography may be useful for differentiating OTR from TNP in complicated neurological cases, particularly in patients who are difficult to examine. This study emphasizes the practical clinical value of fundus photography as a simple, accessible, and objective tool for differentiating OTR from TNP, by contributing the torsional component of OTR triad, particularly in emergency or diagnostically challenging settings where standard examination may be limited.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-08</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 37: Simplifying the Diagnosis of Vertical Diplopia: Is It Skew or Not?</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/37">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020037</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Anas Igbariye
		Noa Hadar
		Basel Obied
		Adi Berco
		Alon Zahavi
		Inbal Man Peles
		Nitza Goldenberg-Cohen
		</p>
	<p>Ocular tilt reaction (OTR) and trochlear nerve palsy (TNP) can induce cyclotorsion. We aimed to assess the utility of fundus photography in distinguishing between these disorders. The database of a neuro-ophthalmology hospital-based clinic was retrospectively searched for patients referred for new-onset vertical diplopia between 2020 and 2023. Medical data were collected, and the angle between the optic disc and fovea was measured using ImageJ software to quantify torsion. Distinct torsional patterns were identified between the groups. OTR was characterized by variable, often conjugate torsion, whereas TNP demonstrated consistent disconjugate extorsion. Analysis of interocular torsional relationships, rather than magnitude alone, provided useful diagnostic discrimination. Fundus photography may be useful for differentiating OTR from TNP in complicated neurological cases, particularly in patients who are difficult to examine. This study emphasizes the practical clinical value of fundus photography as a simple, accessible, and objective tool for differentiating OTR from TNP, by contributing the torsional component of OTR triad, particularly in emergency or diagnostically challenging settings where standard examination may be limited.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Simplifying the Diagnosis of Vertical Diplopia: Is It Skew or Not?</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Anas Igbariye</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Noa Hadar</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Basel Obied</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Adi Berco</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alon Zahavi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Inbal Man Peles</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nitza Goldenberg-Cohen</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020037</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-08</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>37</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020037</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/37</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/36">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 36: An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Between Phoria, Oculomotor Skills and Visual Symptoms in Children Aged 5 to 8 Years</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/36</link>
	<description>Purpose: To investigate the relationship between oculomotor skills, phorias, and visual symptoms in pediatric population aged 5 to 8 years. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 120 children, divided into three age groups. Each participant underwent a full optometric examination, including the Maddox test for dissociated phoria, and the Northeastern State University College of Optometry (NSUCO) and Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) tests for oculomotor function. In addition, the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS V-15) questionnaire was administered to assess visual symptoms. Results: The prevalence of binocular and oculomotor dysfunctions varied by age and sex. Differences in saccadic and pursuit eye movement performance were observed between groups. Older children showed patterns of association between phoria measurements, oculomotor performance, and possible visual symptoms, particularly in girls over 6 years of age. Conclusions: This study provides additional descriptive data for the pediatric population and highlights that oculomotor dysfunction and phoria frequently coexist. Symptom scores measured by the CISS V-15 tended to increase with age. The results should be considered preliminary and potentially hypothesis-generating, pending the future availability of a validated questionnaire to assess phoria-related symptoms in children from 5 years of age. Overall, this study underscores the importance of comprehensive binocular vision assessments in school-aged children.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-02</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 36: An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Between Phoria, Oculomotor Skills and Visual Symptoms in Children Aged 5 to 8 Years</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/36">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020036</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Carmen Bilbao
		Julia Cavero
		Jorge Ares
		Alba Carrera
		Diana Gargallo
		</p>
	<p>Purpose: To investigate the relationship between oculomotor skills, phorias, and visual symptoms in pediatric population aged 5 to 8 years. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 120 children, divided into three age groups. Each participant underwent a full optometric examination, including the Maddox test for dissociated phoria, and the Northeastern State University College of Optometry (NSUCO) and Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) tests for oculomotor function. In addition, the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS V-15) questionnaire was administered to assess visual symptoms. Results: The prevalence of binocular and oculomotor dysfunctions varied by age and sex. Differences in saccadic and pursuit eye movement performance were observed between groups. Older children showed patterns of association between phoria measurements, oculomotor performance, and possible visual symptoms, particularly in girls over 6 years of age. Conclusions: This study provides additional descriptive data for the pediatric population and highlights that oculomotor dysfunction and phoria frequently coexist. Symptom scores measured by the CISS V-15 tended to increase with age. The results should be considered preliminary and potentially hypothesis-generating, pending the future availability of a validated questionnaire to assess phoria-related symptoms in children from 5 years of age. Overall, this study underscores the importance of comprehensive binocular vision assessments in school-aged children.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Between Phoria, Oculomotor Skills and Visual Symptoms in Children Aged 5 to 8 Years</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Carmen Bilbao</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Julia Cavero</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jorge Ares</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alba Carrera</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Diana Gargallo</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020036</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-02</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>36</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020036</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/36</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/35">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 35: Aging Reduces the Efficiency of Parafoveal Lexical Activation During Chinese Sentence Reading</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/35</link>
	<description>This study utilized the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm to examine age-related changes in parafoveal processing during Chinese sentence reading. A community sample of 65 older readers and 68 younger readers from Hong Kong read 130 sentences while their eye movements were recorded. In each sentence, an invisible boundary was placed just before a critical target word. Before the readers&amp;amp;rsquo; eye gaze crossed the boundary, a parafoveal preview was presented in the position of the target word. The preview could be identical, orthographically related, phonologically related, semantically related, or unrelated to the first character of the target word. Once the eye gaze passed the boundary, the preview characters changed to the target. For the younger readers, the related parafoveal previews facilitated the subsequent foveal processing of the target compared to the unrelated previews across early and late eye movement measures. In contrast, the older readers demonstrated a reduced identical preview benefit in early eye movement measures. They also showed benefits in other preview conditions only in later measures. These results suggest that older Chinese readers can extract linguistic information from parafoveal vision despite reduced visual acuity. However, the efficiency of parafoveal processing is reduced, potentially due to slower processing speed and less efficient spreading activation within the lexical network.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-01</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 35: Aging Reduces the Efficiency of Parafoveal Lexical Activation During Chinese Sentence Reading</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/35">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020035</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Yiu-Kei Tsang
		Ming Yan
		Jinger Pan
		</p>
	<p>This study utilized the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm to examine age-related changes in parafoveal processing during Chinese sentence reading. A community sample of 65 older readers and 68 younger readers from Hong Kong read 130 sentences while their eye movements were recorded. In each sentence, an invisible boundary was placed just before a critical target word. Before the readers&amp;amp;rsquo; eye gaze crossed the boundary, a parafoveal preview was presented in the position of the target word. The preview could be identical, orthographically related, phonologically related, semantically related, or unrelated to the first character of the target word. Once the eye gaze passed the boundary, the preview characters changed to the target. For the younger readers, the related parafoveal previews facilitated the subsequent foveal processing of the target compared to the unrelated previews across early and late eye movement measures. In contrast, the older readers demonstrated a reduced identical preview benefit in early eye movement measures. They also showed benefits in other preview conditions only in later measures. These results suggest that older Chinese readers can extract linguistic information from parafoveal vision despite reduced visual acuity. However, the efficiency of parafoveal processing is reduced, potentially due to slower processing speed and less efficient spreading activation within the lexical network.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Aging Reduces the Efficiency of Parafoveal Lexical Activation During Chinese Sentence Reading</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Yiu-Kei Tsang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ming Yan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jinger Pan</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020035</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-01</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>35</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020035</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/35</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/34">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 34: The Impact of Emotion Perception and Gaze Sharing on Collaborative Experience and Performance in Multiplayer Games</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/34</link>
	<description>Compared to traditional offline collaboration, current online collaboration often lacks nonverbal social cues, resulting in lower efficiency and a reduced emotional connection between teammates. To address this issue, this study used a two-player collaborative puzzle game as the experimental setting to explore the impact of two nonverbal social cues, emotion and gaze, on collaborative experience and performance. Specifically, this study designed four collaborative modes: with and without teammates&amp;amp;rsquo; facial expressions, and with and without teammates&amp;amp;rsquo; gaze points. Sixty-two participants took part in the experiment, and each pair was required to complete these four patterns. Subsequently, we analyzed their collaborative experience through subjective questionnaires, objective facial expressions, and gaze overlap rates. The experimental results revealed that teammates&amp;amp;rsquo; gaze could effectively enhance collaborative efficiency, while facial expression is key to optimizing subjective experience. Combining both cues further acquires advantages in cognitive and emotional dimensions, leading to improved performance outcomes. The study also indicated that facial expressions could alleviate the social pressure triggered by shared gaze from teammates. Additionally, the study also examined how personality differences influenced collaborative experiences and performance. The results indicated that individuals with high agreeableness actively seek social cues, leading to more positive collaborative experiences. This study provides empirical evidence for understanding the interactive mechanisms of cognitive and emotional processes during online collaboration, and points the way toward designing adaptive, personalized intelligent collaborative systems.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-25</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 34: The Impact of Emotion Perception and Gaze Sharing on Collaborative Experience and Performance in Multiplayer Games</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/34">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020034</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Lu Yin
		He Zhang
		Renke He
		</p>
	<p>Compared to traditional offline collaboration, current online collaboration often lacks nonverbal social cues, resulting in lower efficiency and a reduced emotional connection between teammates. To address this issue, this study used a two-player collaborative puzzle game as the experimental setting to explore the impact of two nonverbal social cues, emotion and gaze, on collaborative experience and performance. Specifically, this study designed four collaborative modes: with and without teammates&amp;amp;rsquo; facial expressions, and with and without teammates&amp;amp;rsquo; gaze points. Sixty-two participants took part in the experiment, and each pair was required to complete these four patterns. Subsequently, we analyzed their collaborative experience through subjective questionnaires, objective facial expressions, and gaze overlap rates. The experimental results revealed that teammates&amp;amp;rsquo; gaze could effectively enhance collaborative efficiency, while facial expression is key to optimizing subjective experience. Combining both cues further acquires advantages in cognitive and emotional dimensions, leading to improved performance outcomes. The study also indicated that facial expressions could alleviate the social pressure triggered by shared gaze from teammates. Additionally, the study also examined how personality differences influenced collaborative experiences and performance. The results indicated that individuals with high agreeableness actively seek social cues, leading to more positive collaborative experiences. This study provides empirical evidence for understanding the interactive mechanisms of cognitive and emotional processes during online collaboration, and points the way toward designing adaptive, personalized intelligent collaborative systems.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>The Impact of Emotion Perception and Gaze Sharing on Collaborative Experience and Performance in Multiplayer Games</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Lu Yin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>He Zhang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Renke He</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020034</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-25</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>34</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020034</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/34</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/33">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 33: A Data-Driven Approach for Comparing Gaze Allocation Across Conditions</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/33</link>
	<description>Gaze analysis often relies on hypothesised, subjectively defined regions of interest (ROIs) or heatmaps: ROIs enable condition comparisons but reduce objectivity and exploration; while heatmaps avoid this, they require many pixel-wise comparisons, making differences hard to detect. Here, we propose an advanced data-driven approach for analysing gaze behaviour. We use DNNs (adapted versions of AlexNet) to classify conditions from gaze patterns, paired with reverse correlation to show where and how gaze differs between conditions. We test our approach on data from an experiment investigating the effects of object-specific sounds (e.g., church bell ringing) on gaze allocation. ROI-based analysis shows a significant difference between conditions (congruent sound, no sound, phase-scrambled sound and pink noise), with more gaze allocation on sound-associated objects in the congruent sound condition. However, as expected, significance depends on the definition of the ROIs. Heatmaps show some unclear qualitative differences, but none are significant after correcting for pixelwise comparisons. We showed that, for some scenes, the DNNs could classify the task based on individual fixations with accuracy significantly higher than chance. Our approach shows that sound can alter gaze allocation, revealing task-specific, non-trivial strategies: fixations are not always drawn to the sound source but shift away from salient features, sometimes falling between salient features and the sound source. Crucially, such fixation strategies could not be revealed using a traditional hypothesis-driven approach. Overall, the method is objective, data-driven, and enables clear comparisons of conditions.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-18</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 33: A Data-Driven Approach for Comparing Gaze Allocation Across Conditions</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/33">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020033</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Jack Prosser
		Anna Metzger
		Matteo Toscani
		</p>
	<p>Gaze analysis often relies on hypothesised, subjectively defined regions of interest (ROIs) or heatmaps: ROIs enable condition comparisons but reduce objectivity and exploration; while heatmaps avoid this, they require many pixel-wise comparisons, making differences hard to detect. Here, we propose an advanced data-driven approach for analysing gaze behaviour. We use DNNs (adapted versions of AlexNet) to classify conditions from gaze patterns, paired with reverse correlation to show where and how gaze differs between conditions. We test our approach on data from an experiment investigating the effects of object-specific sounds (e.g., church bell ringing) on gaze allocation. ROI-based analysis shows a significant difference between conditions (congruent sound, no sound, phase-scrambled sound and pink noise), with more gaze allocation on sound-associated objects in the congruent sound condition. However, as expected, significance depends on the definition of the ROIs. Heatmaps show some unclear qualitative differences, but none are significant after correcting for pixelwise comparisons. We showed that, for some scenes, the DNNs could classify the task based on individual fixations with accuracy significantly higher than chance. Our approach shows that sound can alter gaze allocation, revealing task-specific, non-trivial strategies: fixations are not always drawn to the sound source but shift away from salient features, sometimes falling between salient features and the sound source. Crucially, such fixation strategies could not be revealed using a traditional hypothesis-driven approach. Overall, the method is objective, data-driven, and enables clear comparisons of conditions.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>A Data-Driven Approach for Comparing Gaze Allocation Across Conditions</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Jack Prosser</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anna Metzger</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Matteo Toscani</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020033</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-18</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020033</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/33</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/32">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 32: Visual Attention in Real Classrooms: A Study with Eye-Tracking in Urban and Rural Schools of Chile</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/32</link>
	<description>Student gaze behavior has been scarcely studied in real Latin American primary school classrooms. The objective of this study is to analyze the relationship between primary students&amp;amp;rsquo; eye behavior and cognitive development in urban and rural contexts. A quantitative method was employed, including 126 primary school students aged 6 to 8 years old, from urban and rural schools in Chile. Raven&amp;amp;rsquo;s Colored Progressive Matrices (CPM) measured cognitive development, and students&amp;amp;rsquo; eye behavior was recorded during a real class using eye-tracking glasses. Eye behavior was analyzed in six areas of interest: (1) Own material (2) teacher, (3) teacher&amp;amp;rsquo;s material, (4) peer, (5) peer&amp;amp;rsquo;s material, and (6) non-interactional gaze. The results indicate that the CPM scale demonstrates adequate reliability (&amp;amp;alpha; = 0.89). In addition, no significant differences, nor relationship between eye behavior and cognitive development, were found by sex; however, significant differences were found by environment (urban versus rural). The regression analysis is significant (F(7, 102) = 6.173, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001) and suggests that gazing at the teacher&amp;amp;rsquo;s material and one&amp;amp;rsquo;s own material are negative predictors of non-interactional gaze or students&amp;amp;rsquo; disconnection from the class. In conclusion, distraction in the classroom is influenced by learning-related contextual variables rather than sex or cognitive development.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-18</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 32: Visual Attention in Real Classrooms: A Study with Eye-Tracking in Urban and Rural Schools of Chile</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/32">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020032</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Marco Villalta-Paucar
		Jéssica Verónica Rebolledo-Etchepare
		</p>
	<p>Student gaze behavior has been scarcely studied in real Latin American primary school classrooms. The objective of this study is to analyze the relationship between primary students&amp;amp;rsquo; eye behavior and cognitive development in urban and rural contexts. A quantitative method was employed, including 126 primary school students aged 6 to 8 years old, from urban and rural schools in Chile. Raven&amp;amp;rsquo;s Colored Progressive Matrices (CPM) measured cognitive development, and students&amp;amp;rsquo; eye behavior was recorded during a real class using eye-tracking glasses. Eye behavior was analyzed in six areas of interest: (1) Own material (2) teacher, (3) teacher&amp;amp;rsquo;s material, (4) peer, (5) peer&amp;amp;rsquo;s material, and (6) non-interactional gaze. The results indicate that the CPM scale demonstrates adequate reliability (&amp;amp;alpha; = 0.89). In addition, no significant differences, nor relationship between eye behavior and cognitive development, were found by sex; however, significant differences were found by environment (urban versus rural). The regression analysis is significant (F(7, 102) = 6.173, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001) and suggests that gazing at the teacher&amp;amp;rsquo;s material and one&amp;amp;rsquo;s own material are negative predictors of non-interactional gaze or students&amp;amp;rsquo; disconnection from the class. In conclusion, distraction in the classroom is influenced by learning-related contextual variables rather than sex or cognitive development.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Visual Attention in Real Classrooms: A Study with Eye-Tracking in Urban and Rural Schools of Chile</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Marco Villalta-Paucar</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jéssica Verónica Rebolledo-Etchepare</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020032</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-18</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>32</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020032</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/32</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/31">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 31: Towards Rigorous Eye-Tracking Methodology in Interdisciplinary Fields: Insights from and Recommendations for Tourism Research</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/31</link>
	<description>Eye-tracking methodology represents a young but rapidly growing approach in tourism research, offering a direct window into the cognitive processes driving tourism stakeholders&amp;amp;rsquo; behaviour. However, a critical gap remains between the rapid adoption of this tool and the methodological rigour required to interpret its neurophysiological data. This critical review synthesizes 23 empirical studies (2020&amp;amp;ndash;2025) from the destination marketing and branding domain to diagnose eye-tracking&amp;amp;rsquo;s state-of-the-art application. Adopting the SALSA framework (Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, Analysis) augmented by PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this study systematically searched Web of Science and Scopus databases. Studies were appraised using an eight-dimensional quality rubric, assessing from theoretical grounding to experimental design to statistical rigour. Findings revealed a &amp;amp;ldquo;tool-first&amp;amp;rdquo; exploratory phenomenon, where the majority of studies relied on basic fixation metrics to infer complex psychological states such as &amp;amp;ldquo;interest&amp;amp;rdquo;, when they could imply other cognitive states. Furthermore, most reviewed studies failed to control for stimulus-level confounds (e.g., luminance, AOI size) and utilized inappropriate data-handling procedures and methods, such as the absence of data cleaning and treating count and binary data as continuous data. These, coupled with transparency deficits, undermined the validity of their conclusions. Hence, a Checklist for Eye-Tracking Rigour (CETR) and a methodological decision tree were developed to guide researchers towards confirmatory and neurobiologically grounded research. Findings also provided a framework for managers/practitioners to more accurately interpret eye-tracking studies.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-12</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 31: Towards Rigorous Eye-Tracking Methodology in Interdisciplinary Fields: Insights from and Recommendations for Tourism Research</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/31">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020031</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Wilson Cheong Hin Hong
		</p>
	<p>Eye-tracking methodology represents a young but rapidly growing approach in tourism research, offering a direct window into the cognitive processes driving tourism stakeholders&amp;amp;rsquo; behaviour. However, a critical gap remains between the rapid adoption of this tool and the methodological rigour required to interpret its neurophysiological data. This critical review synthesizes 23 empirical studies (2020&amp;amp;ndash;2025) from the destination marketing and branding domain to diagnose eye-tracking&amp;amp;rsquo;s state-of-the-art application. Adopting the SALSA framework (Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, Analysis) augmented by PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this study systematically searched Web of Science and Scopus databases. Studies were appraised using an eight-dimensional quality rubric, assessing from theoretical grounding to experimental design to statistical rigour. Findings revealed a &amp;amp;ldquo;tool-first&amp;amp;rdquo; exploratory phenomenon, where the majority of studies relied on basic fixation metrics to infer complex psychological states such as &amp;amp;ldquo;interest&amp;amp;rdquo;, when they could imply other cognitive states. Furthermore, most reviewed studies failed to control for stimulus-level confounds (e.g., luminance, AOI size) and utilized inappropriate data-handling procedures and methods, such as the absence of data cleaning and treating count and binary data as continuous data. These, coupled with transparency deficits, undermined the validity of their conclusions. Hence, a Checklist for Eye-Tracking Rigour (CETR) and a methodological decision tree were developed to guide researchers towards confirmatory and neurobiologically grounded research. Findings also provided a framework for managers/practitioners to more accurately interpret eye-tracking studies.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Towards Rigorous Eye-Tracking Methodology in Interdisciplinary Fields: Insights from and Recommendations for Tourism Research</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Wilson Cheong Hin Hong</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020031</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-12</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>31</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020031</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/31</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/30">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 30: Seeing Through Packaging: Eye-Tracking Evidence on How Product Visual Strategy and Unit Size Shape Visual Attention and Consumer Evaluation</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/30</link>
	<description>Product visual strategies (PVS) on food packaging influence how consumers visually inspect products at the point of purchase. However, evidence comparing transparent windows and product images remains mixed, particularly regarding how these strategies interact with food unit size (FUS) and shape visual attention patterns. Moreover, few studies have examined these effects using objective eye-tracking measures within controlled experimental designs. This study employed a 2 &amp;amp;times; 2 between-subjects quasi-experiment to investigate the effects of PVS (transparent window and product image) and FUS (large unit and small unit) on visual attention and subsequent product-related evaluations. A total of 160 participants viewed realistic chocolate package stimuli that varied only in visual strategy and unit size. Eye movements were recorded using Tobii Pro Glasses 2. Visual attention was assessed through Time to First Fixation (TFF) and Fixation Duration (FD), while expected tastiness, expected quality, and purchase intention were measured using standardized self-report scales. The results showed that transparent-window packaging attracted visual attention more rapidly and sustained longer fixations than product-image packaging. These attention differences were accompanied by higher expected tastiness, expected quality, and purchase intention. While food unit size alone showed limited effects on eye-movement measures, a significant interaction was observed: small-unit designs elicited greater visual attention and more favorable evaluations only when the product was directly visible through a transparent window. Overall, the findings demonstrate how product visual strategies and food unit size jointly shape visual attention allocation during packaging inspection. By integrating eye-tracking measures with evaluation and behavioral intention outcomes, this study contributes to applied eye-movement research in food packaging contexts.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-10</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 30: Seeing Through Packaging: Eye-Tracking Evidence on How Product Visual Strategy and Unit Size Shape Visual Attention and Consumer Evaluation</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/30">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020030</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Zhiyi Guo
		Zihao Cao
		Yongchun Mao
		Muhizam Mustafa
		Yuqi Luo
		Yueyue Ning
		</p>
	<p>Product visual strategies (PVS) on food packaging influence how consumers visually inspect products at the point of purchase. However, evidence comparing transparent windows and product images remains mixed, particularly regarding how these strategies interact with food unit size (FUS) and shape visual attention patterns. Moreover, few studies have examined these effects using objective eye-tracking measures within controlled experimental designs. This study employed a 2 &amp;amp;times; 2 between-subjects quasi-experiment to investigate the effects of PVS (transparent window and product image) and FUS (large unit and small unit) on visual attention and subsequent product-related evaluations. A total of 160 participants viewed realistic chocolate package stimuli that varied only in visual strategy and unit size. Eye movements were recorded using Tobii Pro Glasses 2. Visual attention was assessed through Time to First Fixation (TFF) and Fixation Duration (FD), while expected tastiness, expected quality, and purchase intention were measured using standardized self-report scales. The results showed that transparent-window packaging attracted visual attention more rapidly and sustained longer fixations than product-image packaging. These attention differences were accompanied by higher expected tastiness, expected quality, and purchase intention. While food unit size alone showed limited effects on eye-movement measures, a significant interaction was observed: small-unit designs elicited greater visual attention and more favorable evaluations only when the product was directly visible through a transparent window. Overall, the findings demonstrate how product visual strategies and food unit size jointly shape visual attention allocation during packaging inspection. By integrating eye-tracking measures with evaluation and behavioral intention outcomes, this study contributes to applied eye-movement research in food packaging contexts.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Seeing Through Packaging: Eye-Tracking Evidence on How Product Visual Strategy and Unit Size Shape Visual Attention and Consumer Evaluation</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Zhiyi Guo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zihao Cao</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yongchun Mao</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Muhizam Mustafa</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yuqi Luo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yueyue Ning</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020030</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-10</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>30</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020030</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/30</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/29">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 29: Simultaneous Analysis of Microsaccades and Pupil Size Variations in Age-Related Cognitive Impairment Using Eye-Tracking Technology</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/29</link>
	<description>Age-related cognitive impairment represents a critical stage in the continuum of neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer&amp;amp;rsquo;s disease (AD), highlighting the need for objective and non-invasive physiological indicators of early neurological change. This study investigates the simultaneous analysis of microsaccadic eye movements and pupil size variations as ocular biomarkers associated with age-related cognitive impairment using eye-tracking technology. A total of 70 participants were recruited and categorized into three age groups: individuals in their 20s, 60s, and 70s. Participants in their 70s were further categorized based on MMSE-K scores into cognitively normal (&amp;amp;ge;24) and impaired (&amp;amp;le;23) subgroups. Quantitative analyses showed a significant age-related increase in microsaccade frequency along both axes, with significantly higher microsaccade frequencies (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.01) among individuals with lower cognitive scores within the same age group. Pupil size variation, including constriction and dilation rates, declined with age, while response speed remained relatively unchanged across all age groups. These findings highlight a clear association between age related-cognitive decline and involuntary ocular responses. The proposed dual-biomarker method offers a non-invasive and quantitative framework that may complement traditional cognitive screening tools. Future studies involving larger cohorts and clinically diagnosed AD populations are required to determine the diagnostic utility of these ocular biomarkers.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-05</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 29: Simultaneous Analysis of Microsaccades and Pupil Size Variations in Age-Related Cognitive Impairment Using Eye-Tracking Technology</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/29">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020029</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Seokjun Oh
		Tahsin Nairuz
		Sung-Jun Park
		Jong-Ha Lee
		</p>
	<p>Age-related cognitive impairment represents a critical stage in the continuum of neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer&amp;amp;rsquo;s disease (AD), highlighting the need for objective and non-invasive physiological indicators of early neurological change. This study investigates the simultaneous analysis of microsaccadic eye movements and pupil size variations as ocular biomarkers associated with age-related cognitive impairment using eye-tracking technology. A total of 70 participants were recruited and categorized into three age groups: individuals in their 20s, 60s, and 70s. Participants in their 70s were further categorized based on MMSE-K scores into cognitively normal (&amp;amp;ge;24) and impaired (&amp;amp;le;23) subgroups. Quantitative analyses showed a significant age-related increase in microsaccade frequency along both axes, with significantly higher microsaccade frequencies (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.01) among individuals with lower cognitive scores within the same age group. Pupil size variation, including constriction and dilation rates, declined with age, while response speed remained relatively unchanged across all age groups. These findings highlight a clear association between age related-cognitive decline and involuntary ocular responses. The proposed dual-biomarker method offers a non-invasive and quantitative framework that may complement traditional cognitive screening tools. Future studies involving larger cohorts and clinically diagnosed AD populations are required to determine the diagnostic utility of these ocular biomarkers.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Simultaneous Analysis of Microsaccades and Pupil Size Variations in Age-Related Cognitive Impairment Using Eye-Tracking Technology</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Seokjun Oh</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tahsin Nairuz</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sung-Jun Park</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jong-Ha Lee</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020029</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-05</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-05</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>29</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020029</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/29</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/28">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 28: Comparing Eye-Tracking Metrics with the Driver Activity Load Index</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/28</link>
	<description>This study investigated how perceptual workload in driving situations is captured by subjective ratings versus eye-tracking metrics. Fifty participants completed low- and high-complexity conditions while fixation behavior, blinks, and pupil diameter were recorded, and workload was assessed using the DALI scale. High-load scenes elicited longer fixations, fewer fixations per minute, reduced blinking, and increased pupil dilation, indicating elevated attentional demand. DALI scores increased with scene complexity and were negatively associated with fixation duration, demonstrating that participants&amp;amp;rsquo; subjective ratings were driven primarily by perceptual strain rather than cognitive effort. Eye-tracking patterns supported this interpretation: fixation-based indicators tent to reflect the cognitive component of demand, whereas DALI selectively tracked perceptual overload. Together, these results show that DALI is highly sensitive to visual density, and that eye-movement measures provide converging evidence for its specificity as a perceptual load instrument.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-05</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 28: Comparing Eye-Tracking Metrics with the Driver Activity Load Index</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/28">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020028</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Julia Bend
		Markus Gödker
		Elise Sophie Banach
		Thomas Franke
		</p>
	<p>This study investigated how perceptual workload in driving situations is captured by subjective ratings versus eye-tracking metrics. Fifty participants completed low- and high-complexity conditions while fixation behavior, blinks, and pupil diameter were recorded, and workload was assessed using the DALI scale. High-load scenes elicited longer fixations, fewer fixations per minute, reduced blinking, and increased pupil dilation, indicating elevated attentional demand. DALI scores increased with scene complexity and were negatively associated with fixation duration, demonstrating that participants&amp;amp;rsquo; subjective ratings were driven primarily by perceptual strain rather than cognitive effort. Eye-tracking patterns supported this interpretation: fixation-based indicators tent to reflect the cognitive component of demand, whereas DALI selectively tracked perceptual overload. Together, these results show that DALI is highly sensitive to visual density, and that eye-movement measures provide converging evidence for its specificity as a perceptual load instrument.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Comparing Eye-Tracking Metrics with the Driver Activity Load Index</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Julia Bend</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Markus Gödker</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Elise Sophie Banach</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Thomas Franke</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020028</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-05</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-05</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>28</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020028</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/28</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/27">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 27: Calendar Horizon as a Boundary Affordance: An Attempt-Centric Eye-Tracking Analysis of Calendar Scheduling Interfaces</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/27</link>
	<description>Digital calendars are interactive representations of time that shape both scheduling outcomes and the micro-process of searching, verifying, and revising candidate placements. We examine calendar horizon&amp;amp;mdash;whether weekend time is visible in the default week view&amp;amp;mdash;as a boundary affordance in scheduling interfaces. Using eye tracking and interaction logs, we model each scheduling episode as a sequence of placement attempts and align gaze to each attempt, partitioning it into Early/Mid/Late phases and summarizing attention across structural AOIs (task panel, calendar grid, and the weekend column when present). Two experiments used drag-and-drop and dropdown slot-picking; weekend visibility was manipulated within the dropdown interface, while evening slots remained available. Across 105 participants (1018 task episodes), AttemptsCount ranged from 1 to 7. AttemptsCount predicted gaze-based process cost: each additional attempt corresponded to ~56% more total fixation duration. Personal tasks required more attempts than work tasks and elicited stronger Late-phase weekend verification when the weekend was visible. Horizon cues also shifted boundary outcomes: hiding the weekend reduced weekend placements and increased reliance on evening scheduling, indicating displacement into adjacent time regions. These findings position calendar horizon as a design lever that shapes both process (verification) and outcomes (boundary placements), with implications for calendar UIs and mixed-initiative scheduling tools.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-02</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 27: Calendar Horizon as a Boundary Affordance: An Attempt-Centric Eye-Tracking Analysis of Calendar Scheduling Interfaces</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/27">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020027</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Nina Xie
		Yuanyuan Wang
		Yujun Liu
		</p>
	<p>Digital calendars are interactive representations of time that shape both scheduling outcomes and the micro-process of searching, verifying, and revising candidate placements. We examine calendar horizon&amp;amp;mdash;whether weekend time is visible in the default week view&amp;amp;mdash;as a boundary affordance in scheduling interfaces. Using eye tracking and interaction logs, we model each scheduling episode as a sequence of placement attempts and align gaze to each attempt, partitioning it into Early/Mid/Late phases and summarizing attention across structural AOIs (task panel, calendar grid, and the weekend column when present). Two experiments used drag-and-drop and dropdown slot-picking; weekend visibility was manipulated within the dropdown interface, while evening slots remained available. Across 105 participants (1018 task episodes), AttemptsCount ranged from 1 to 7. AttemptsCount predicted gaze-based process cost: each additional attempt corresponded to ~56% more total fixation duration. Personal tasks required more attempts than work tasks and elicited stronger Late-phase weekend verification when the weekend was visible. Horizon cues also shifted boundary outcomes: hiding the weekend reduced weekend placements and increased reliance on evening scheduling, indicating displacement into adjacent time regions. These findings position calendar horizon as a design lever that shapes both process (verification) and outcomes (boundary placements), with implications for calendar UIs and mixed-initiative scheduling tools.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Calendar Horizon as a Boundary Affordance: An Attempt-Centric Eye-Tracking Analysis of Calendar Scheduling Interfaces</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Nina Xie</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yuanyuan Wang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yujun Liu</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020027</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-02</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>27</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020027</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/27</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/26">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 26: Integrating Multi-Task Eye Tracking and Interpretable Machine Learning for High-Accuracy Screening of Amblyopia in Pediatric Populations</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/26</link>
	<description>Amblyopia is a developmental disorder of spatial vision in which abnormal visual experience leads to persistent reductions in acuity and contrast sensitivity, even after optimal optical correction. We introduce a brief, child-friendly battery of task-evoked eye tracking that probes fixation stability, fine pattern processing, and smooth pursuit control across three simple paradigms. Oculomotor traces are transformed into physiologically interpretable markers&amp;amp;mdash;fixation dispersion and saccadic strategy, orientation-dependent drift and stability, pursuit gain, and tracking error&amp;amp;mdash;and used to train a compact classifier with subject-wise validation and probability calibration. In a cohort of school-aged participants with clinically diagnosed unilateral amblyopia and age-matched visually normal controls tested under best-corrected viewing conditions, the approach consistently separated groups with stable performance across folds; feature-importance analyses indicated that pursuit- and orientation-dependent markers contributed most. The protocol runs in minutes, is objective and noninvasive, and is well tolerated in pediatric settings. By quantifying functional consequences of amblyopic vision that complement conventional acuity testing, this work positions task-evoked eye movements as practical biomarkers for screening and monitoring, and lays the groundwork for prospective validation and age-stratified norms in community and school-based vision care.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-02</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 26: Integrating Multi-Task Eye Tracking and Interpretable Machine Learning for High-Accuracy Screening of Amblyopia in Pediatric Populations</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/26">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020026</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Xiumei Song
		Yunhan Zhang
		Hongyu Chen
		Chenyu Tang
		Bohan Yao
		Hubin Zhao
		Luigi G. Occhipinti
		Arokia Nathan
		Changbin Zhai
		Shuo Gao
		</p>
	<p>Amblyopia is a developmental disorder of spatial vision in which abnormal visual experience leads to persistent reductions in acuity and contrast sensitivity, even after optimal optical correction. We introduce a brief, child-friendly battery of task-evoked eye tracking that probes fixation stability, fine pattern processing, and smooth pursuit control across three simple paradigms. Oculomotor traces are transformed into physiologically interpretable markers&amp;amp;mdash;fixation dispersion and saccadic strategy, orientation-dependent drift and stability, pursuit gain, and tracking error&amp;amp;mdash;and used to train a compact classifier with subject-wise validation and probability calibration. In a cohort of school-aged participants with clinically diagnosed unilateral amblyopia and age-matched visually normal controls tested under best-corrected viewing conditions, the approach consistently separated groups with stable performance across folds; feature-importance analyses indicated that pursuit- and orientation-dependent markers contributed most. The protocol runs in minutes, is objective and noninvasive, and is well tolerated in pediatric settings. By quantifying functional consequences of amblyopic vision that complement conventional acuity testing, this work positions task-evoked eye movements as practical biomarkers for screening and monitoring, and lays the groundwork for prospective validation and age-stratified norms in community and school-based vision care.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Integrating Multi-Task Eye Tracking and Interpretable Machine Learning for High-Accuracy Screening of Amblyopia in Pediatric Populations</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Xiumei Song</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yunhan Zhang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hongyu Chen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Chenyu Tang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Bohan Yao</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hubin Zhao</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Luigi G. Occhipinti</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Arokia Nathan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Changbin Zhai</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shuo Gao</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020026</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-02</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>26</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020026</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/26</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/25">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 25: Characteristics of Eye Movements and Correlation to Cognitive Functions in Relation to the Location of Guide Signs and Driving Speed</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/25</link>
	<description>Driving safety critically depends on the ability of drivers to efficiently recognize and process guide sign information under varying traffic conditions. This study examined how driving speed (slow/fast) and guide sign location (front/left) influence eye-movement behavior during guide sign recognition, and how these effects relate to drivers’ cognitive functions and basic demographics. Twenty-four licensed drivers performed a guide sign recognition task using onboard video stimuli, and eye movements based on fixations and saccades were recorded. Generalized linear mixed models with participants as random effects were used to analyze the interactions between driving conditions, cognitive functions, demographics, and eye movement measures. Under low-load conditions, such as slow driving and front-positioned signs, individual differences in cognitive functions, including verbal memory and useful field of view, were strongly reflected in eye-movement behavior. Under high-load conditions characterized by fast driving and left-positioned signs, the influence of cognitive function was reduced, and eye movements were more strongly associated with driving experience. Increasing driving speed was associated with fewer eye movements, whereas the saccade amplitude remained unchanged, indicating the suppression of exploratory eye movements. For left-positioned signs, the fixation duration on the target was maintained, whereas gaze shifts between the forward environment and the sign were reduced.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-02</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 25: Characteristics of Eye Movements and Correlation to Cognitive Functions in Relation to the Location of Guide Signs and Driving Speed</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/25">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020025</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Takaya Maeyama
		Hiroki Okada
		Daisuke Sawamura
		</p>
	<p>Driving safety critically depends on the ability of drivers to efficiently recognize and process guide sign information under varying traffic conditions. This study examined how driving speed (slow/fast) and guide sign location (front/left) influence eye-movement behavior during guide sign recognition, and how these effects relate to drivers’ cognitive functions and basic demographics. Twenty-four licensed drivers performed a guide sign recognition task using onboard video stimuli, and eye movements based on fixations and saccades were recorded. Generalized linear mixed models with participants as random effects were used to analyze the interactions between driving conditions, cognitive functions, demographics, and eye movement measures. Under low-load conditions, such as slow driving and front-positioned signs, individual differences in cognitive functions, including verbal memory and useful field of view, were strongly reflected in eye-movement behavior. Under high-load conditions characterized by fast driving and left-positioned signs, the influence of cognitive function was reduced, and eye movements were more strongly associated with driving experience. Increasing driving speed was associated with fewer eye movements, whereas the saccade amplitude remained unchanged, indicating the suppression of exploratory eye movements. For left-positioned signs, the fixation duration on the target was maintained, whereas gaze shifts between the forward environment and the sign were reduced.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Characteristics of Eye Movements and Correlation to Cognitive Functions in Relation to the Location of Guide Signs and Driving Speed</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Takaya Maeyama</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hiroki Okada</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Daisuke Sawamura</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020025</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-02</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020025</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/25</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/24">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 24: A Feasibility Study of Tablet-Based Eye Movement Assessment Using a Built-In Camera: A Pilot Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/24</link>
	<description>This study developed a tablet PC&amp;amp;ndash;based eye movement assessment application and conducted a pilot investigation to explore whether tablet-based ocular motor metrics demonstrate functional sensitivity to variations in conventional visual function parameters. Twenty-three healthy adults (10 males, 13 females; mean age: 24.41 &amp;amp;plusmn; 1.91 years) without a history of ocular disease performed smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movement tests at three difficulty levels. For exploratory analysis, participants were stratified into above- and below-mean groups based on conventional visual function test results. For smooth pursuit movements, mean pursuit traversal time demonstrated statistically significant differences between the low&amp;amp;ndash;medium (1.11 s) and low&amp;amp;ndash;high (1.14 s) difficulty levels (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.05), with corresponding differences in derived velocity. Saccadic movements showed significant mean accuracy differences between low-high (1.02 points) and medium-high (0.95 points) difficulty levels (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.05). Participants with higher-than-average horizontal phoria values (distance and near) and the blur/break points of near convergence amplitude exhibited significantly longer smooth pursuit traversal times (corresponding to slower derived velocities) (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.05). The high-value group for blur point of near convergence amplitude demonstrated significantly superior saccadic accuracy (1.63 points) compared with the low-value group (1.30 points) (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.05). Exploratory associations between visual function parameters and ocular motor performance were observed within the healthy participant group, suggesting exploratory associations between tablet-based smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movement performance and conventional visual function measures. These findings suggest that tablet PC&amp;amp;ndash;based eye movement assessment may serve as a feasible, low-cost approach for exploratory screening and functional monitoring, rather than a validated diagnostic tool.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-02-24</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 24: A Feasibility Study of Tablet-Based Eye Movement Assessment Using a Built-In Camera: A Pilot Study</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/24">doi: 10.3390/jemr19020024</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Kyunghyun Park
		Unseok Lee
		Sejoon Moon
		Hyungsik Bae
		Hyungoo Kang
		</p>
	<p>This study developed a tablet PC&amp;amp;ndash;based eye movement assessment application and conducted a pilot investigation to explore whether tablet-based ocular motor metrics demonstrate functional sensitivity to variations in conventional visual function parameters. Twenty-three healthy adults (10 males, 13 females; mean age: 24.41 &amp;amp;plusmn; 1.91 years) without a history of ocular disease performed smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movement tests at three difficulty levels. For exploratory analysis, participants were stratified into above- and below-mean groups based on conventional visual function test results. For smooth pursuit movements, mean pursuit traversal time demonstrated statistically significant differences between the low&amp;amp;ndash;medium (1.11 s) and low&amp;amp;ndash;high (1.14 s) difficulty levels (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.05), with corresponding differences in derived velocity. Saccadic movements showed significant mean accuracy differences between low-high (1.02 points) and medium-high (0.95 points) difficulty levels (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.05). Participants with higher-than-average horizontal phoria values (distance and near) and the blur/break points of near convergence amplitude exhibited significantly longer smooth pursuit traversal times (corresponding to slower derived velocities) (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.05). The high-value group for blur point of near convergence amplitude demonstrated significantly superior saccadic accuracy (1.63 points) compared with the low-value group (1.30 points) (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.05). Exploratory associations between visual function parameters and ocular motor performance were observed within the healthy participant group, suggesting exploratory associations between tablet-based smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movement performance and conventional visual function measures. These findings suggest that tablet PC&amp;amp;ndash;based eye movement assessment may serve as a feasible, low-cost approach for exploratory screening and functional monitoring, rather than a validated diagnostic tool.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>A Feasibility Study of Tablet-Based Eye Movement Assessment Using a Built-In Camera: A Pilot Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Kyunghyun Park</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Unseok Lee</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sejoon Moon</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hyungsik Bae</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hyungoo Kang</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19020024</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-02-24</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19020024</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/2/24</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/23">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 23: Mapping Eye-Tracking Research in Human&amp;ndash;Computer Interaction: A Science-Mapping and Content-Analysis Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/23</link>
	<description>Eye tracking has become a central method in human&amp;amp;ndash;computer interaction (HCI), supported by advances in sensing technologies and AI-based gaze analysis. Despite this rapid growth, a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of eye-tracking research across the broader HCI landscape remains lacking. This study combines records from Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus to analyse 1033 publications on eye tracking in HCI published between 2020 and 2025. After merging and deduplicating the datasets, we conducted bibliometric network analyses (keyword co-occurrence, co-citation, co-authorship, and source mapping) using VOSviewer and performed a qualitative content analysis of the 50 most-cited papers. The literature is dominated by journal articles and conference papers produced by small- to medium-sized research teams (mean: 3.9 authors per paper; h-index: 29). Keyword and overlay visualisations reveal four principal research axes: deep-learning-based gaze estimation; XR-related interaction paradigms within HCI; cognitive load and human factors; and usability- and accessibility-oriented interface design. The most-cited studies focus on gaze interaction in immersive environments, deep learning for gaze estimation, multimodal interaction, and physiological approaches to assessing cognitive load. Overall, the findings indicate that eye tracking in HCI is evolving from a measurement-oriented technique into a core enabling technology that supports interaction design, cognitive assessment, accessibility, and ethical considerations such as privacy. This review identifies research gaps and outlines future directions for benchmarking practices, real-world deployments, and privacy-preserving gaze analytics in HCI.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-02-12</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 23: Mapping Eye-Tracking Research in Human&amp;ndash;Computer Interaction: A Science-Mapping and Content-Analysis Study</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/23">doi: 10.3390/jemr19010023</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Adem Korkmaz
		</p>
	<p>Eye tracking has become a central method in human&amp;amp;ndash;computer interaction (HCI), supported by advances in sensing technologies and AI-based gaze analysis. Despite this rapid growth, a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of eye-tracking research across the broader HCI landscape remains lacking. This study combines records from Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus to analyse 1033 publications on eye tracking in HCI published between 2020 and 2025. After merging and deduplicating the datasets, we conducted bibliometric network analyses (keyword co-occurrence, co-citation, co-authorship, and source mapping) using VOSviewer and performed a qualitative content analysis of the 50 most-cited papers. The literature is dominated by journal articles and conference papers produced by small- to medium-sized research teams (mean: 3.9 authors per paper; h-index: 29). Keyword and overlay visualisations reveal four principal research axes: deep-learning-based gaze estimation; XR-related interaction paradigms within HCI; cognitive load and human factors; and usability- and accessibility-oriented interface design. The most-cited studies focus on gaze interaction in immersive environments, deep learning for gaze estimation, multimodal interaction, and physiological approaches to assessing cognitive load. Overall, the findings indicate that eye tracking in HCI is evolving from a measurement-oriented technique into a core enabling technology that supports interaction design, cognitive assessment, accessibility, and ethical considerations such as privacy. This review identifies research gaps and outlines future directions for benchmarking practices, real-world deployments, and privacy-preserving gaze analytics in HCI.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Mapping Eye-Tracking Research in Human&amp;amp;ndash;Computer Interaction: A Science-Mapping and Content-Analysis Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Adem Korkmaz</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19010023</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-02-12</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19010023</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/23</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/22">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 22: Influence of Multimodal AR-HUD Navigation Prompt Design on Driving Behavior at F-Type-5 M Intersections</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/22</link>
	<description>In complex urban traffic environments, the design of multimodal prompts in augmented reality head-up displays (AR-HUDs) plays a critical role in driving safety and operational efficiency. Despite growing interest in audiovisual navigation assistance, empirical evidence remains limited regarding when prompts should be delivered and whether visual and auditory information should remain temporally aligned. To address this gap, this study aims to examine how audiovisual prompt timing and prompt mode influence driving behavior in AR-HUD navigation systems at complex F-type-5 m intersections through a within-subject experimental design. A 2 (prompt mode: synchronized vs. asynchronous) × 3 (prompt timing: −1000 m, −600 m, −400 m) design was employed to assess driver response time, situational awareness, and eye-movement measures, including average fixation duration and fixation count. The results showed clear main effects of both prompt mode and prompt timing. Compared with asynchronous prompts, synchronized prompts consistently resulted in shorter response times, reduced visual demand, and higher situational awareness. Driving performance also improved as prompt timing shifted closer to the intersection, from −1000 m to −400 m. But no significant interaction effects were found, suggesting that prompt mode and prompt timing can be treated as relatively independent design factors. In addition, among the six experimental conditions, the −400 m synchronized condition yielded the most favorable overall performance, whereas the −1000 m asynchronous condition performed worst. These findings indicate that in time-critical and low-tolerance scenarios, such as F-type-5 m intersections, near-distance synchronized multimodal prompts should be prioritized. This study provides empirical support for optimizing prompt timing and cross-modal temporal alignment in AR-HUD systems and offers actionable implications for interface and timing design.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-02-11</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 22: Influence of Multimodal AR-HUD Navigation Prompt Design on Driving Behavior at F-Type-5 M Intersections</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/22">doi: 10.3390/jemr19010022</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Ziqi Liu
		Zhengxing Yang
		Yifan Du
		</p>
	<p>In complex urban traffic environments, the design of multimodal prompts in augmented reality head-up displays (AR-HUDs) plays a critical role in driving safety and operational efficiency. Despite growing interest in audiovisual navigation assistance, empirical evidence remains limited regarding when prompts should be delivered and whether visual and auditory information should remain temporally aligned. To address this gap, this study aims to examine how audiovisual prompt timing and prompt mode influence driving behavior in AR-HUD navigation systems at complex F-type-5 m intersections through a within-subject experimental design. A 2 (prompt mode: synchronized vs. asynchronous) × 3 (prompt timing: −1000 m, −600 m, −400 m) design was employed to assess driver response time, situational awareness, and eye-movement measures, including average fixation duration and fixation count. The results showed clear main effects of both prompt mode and prompt timing. Compared with asynchronous prompts, synchronized prompts consistently resulted in shorter response times, reduced visual demand, and higher situational awareness. Driving performance also improved as prompt timing shifted closer to the intersection, from −1000 m to −400 m. But no significant interaction effects were found, suggesting that prompt mode and prompt timing can be treated as relatively independent design factors. In addition, among the six experimental conditions, the −400 m synchronized condition yielded the most favorable overall performance, whereas the −1000 m asynchronous condition performed worst. These findings indicate that in time-critical and low-tolerance scenarios, such as F-type-5 m intersections, near-distance synchronized multimodal prompts should be prioritized. This study provides empirical support for optimizing prompt timing and cross-modal temporal alignment in AR-HUD systems and offers actionable implications for interface and timing design.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Influence of Multimodal AR-HUD Navigation Prompt Design on Driving Behavior at F-Type-5 M Intersections</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Ziqi Liu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zhengxing Yang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yifan Du</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19010022</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-02-11</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-11</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19010022</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/22</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/21">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 21: Influence of Stimulus Layout and Social Presence on Deception-Related Eye Movements and Blinks in the Concealed Information Test</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/21</link>
	<description>Over the past decades, eye movements and blinks have been integrated into Concealed Information Test (CIT) paradigms as indicators of deception. Recent findings suggested that fixation patterns in CITs depend on stimulus layout, particularly the distinction between sequential and simultaneous stimulus presentation. In addition, the impact of social presence on deceptive eye movements, critical for application of the CIT in real-world social settings, remains insufficiently examined. The present study addresses these issues through two experiments. In both, participants selected a card and had to reveal, conceal, or fake its value while all possible cards were displayed in pairs. Experiment 1 examined whether deceptive intentions could be differentiated using fixations and blinks, and extended previous findings on the effect of stimulus layout. Experiment 2 assessed the stability of deception-related eye movements and blinks across various levels of social presence (without, per video, being observed by a real person). Our findings replicate effects previously observed with simultaneous stimulus presentation of more cards, demonstrating how stimulus layout modulates deception-related eye movement patterns in CITs. The levels of social presence realised in this study did not significantly alter these patterns, indicating that deception-related eye movements and blinks in CITs remain stable under passive social presence.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-02-11</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 21: Influence of Stimulus Layout and Social Presence on Deception-Related Eye Movements and Blinks in the Concealed Information Test</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/21">doi: 10.3390/jemr19010021</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Valentin Foucher
		Anke Huckauf
		</p>
	<p>Over the past decades, eye movements and blinks have been integrated into Concealed Information Test (CIT) paradigms as indicators of deception. Recent findings suggested that fixation patterns in CITs depend on stimulus layout, particularly the distinction between sequential and simultaneous stimulus presentation. In addition, the impact of social presence on deceptive eye movements, critical for application of the CIT in real-world social settings, remains insufficiently examined. The present study addresses these issues through two experiments. In both, participants selected a card and had to reveal, conceal, or fake its value while all possible cards were displayed in pairs. Experiment 1 examined whether deceptive intentions could be differentiated using fixations and blinks, and extended previous findings on the effect of stimulus layout. Experiment 2 assessed the stability of deception-related eye movements and blinks across various levels of social presence (without, per video, being observed by a real person). Our findings replicate effects previously observed with simultaneous stimulus presentation of more cards, demonstrating how stimulus layout modulates deception-related eye movement patterns in CITs. The levels of social presence realised in this study did not significantly alter these patterns, indicating that deception-related eye movements and blinks in CITs remain stable under passive social presence.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Influence of Stimulus Layout and Social Presence on Deception-Related Eye Movements and Blinks in the Concealed Information Test</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Valentin Foucher</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anke Huckauf</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19010021</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-02-11</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-11</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19010021</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/21</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/20">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 20: An Open-Source Horizontal Strabismus Simulator as an Evaluation Platform for Monocular Gaze Estimation Using Deep Learning Models</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/20</link>
	<description>Strabismus affects 2&amp;amp;ndash;4% of the global population, with horizontal cases accounting for more than 90%. Automated screening using monocular gaze estimation technology shows promise for early detection. However, existing models assume normal binocular vision, and their applicability to strabismus remains unvalidated due to the lack of evaluation platforms capable of reproducing disconjugate eye movements with known ground-truth angles. To address this gap, we developed an open-source, low-cost (approximately 200 USD) horizontal strabismus simulator. The simulator features two independently controllable artificial eyeballs mounted on a two-axis gimbal mechanism with servo motors and gyro sensors for real-time angle measurement. Mechanical accuracy achieved a mean absolute error of less than 0.1&amp;amp;deg; across all axes, well below the clinical detection threshold of 1 prism diopter (&amp;amp;asymp;0.57&amp;amp;deg;). An evaluation of three representative AI models (Single Eye, GazeNet, and EyeNet) revealed estimation errors of 6.44&amp;amp;ndash;8.75&amp;amp;deg;, substantially exceeding the clinical target of 2.8&amp;amp;deg;. At this error level, small-angle strabismus (&amp;amp;lt;15 prism diopters) would likely be missed, underscoring the need for strabismus-specific model development. Moreover, rapid accuracy degradation was observed beyond &amp;amp;plusmn;15&amp;amp;deg; gaze angles. This platform establishes baseline performance metrics and provides a foundation for advancing gaze estimation technology for strabismus screening.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-02-09</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 20: An Open-Source Horizontal Strabismus Simulator as an Evaluation Platform for Monocular Gaze Estimation Using Deep Learning Models</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/20">doi: 10.3390/jemr19010020</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Shumpei Takinami
		Yuka Morita
		Jun Seita
		Tetsuro Oshika
		</p>
	<p>Strabismus affects 2&amp;amp;ndash;4% of the global population, with horizontal cases accounting for more than 90%. Automated screening using monocular gaze estimation technology shows promise for early detection. However, existing models assume normal binocular vision, and their applicability to strabismus remains unvalidated due to the lack of evaluation platforms capable of reproducing disconjugate eye movements with known ground-truth angles. To address this gap, we developed an open-source, low-cost (approximately 200 USD) horizontal strabismus simulator. The simulator features two independently controllable artificial eyeballs mounted on a two-axis gimbal mechanism with servo motors and gyro sensors for real-time angle measurement. Mechanical accuracy achieved a mean absolute error of less than 0.1&amp;amp;deg; across all axes, well below the clinical detection threshold of 1 prism diopter (&amp;amp;asymp;0.57&amp;amp;deg;). An evaluation of three representative AI models (Single Eye, GazeNet, and EyeNet) revealed estimation errors of 6.44&amp;amp;ndash;8.75&amp;amp;deg;, substantially exceeding the clinical target of 2.8&amp;amp;deg;. At this error level, small-angle strabismus (&amp;amp;lt;15 prism diopters) would likely be missed, underscoring the need for strabismus-specific model development. Moreover, rapid accuracy degradation was observed beyond &amp;amp;plusmn;15&amp;amp;deg; gaze angles. This platform establishes baseline performance metrics and provides a foundation for advancing gaze estimation technology for strabismus screening.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>An Open-Source Horizontal Strabismus Simulator as an Evaluation Platform for Monocular Gaze Estimation Using Deep Learning Models</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Shumpei Takinami</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yuka Morita</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jun Seita</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tetsuro Oshika</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19010020</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-02-09</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19010020</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/20</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/19">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 19: The Impact of 3D Interactive Prompts on College Students&amp;rsquo; Learning Outcomes in Desktop Virtual Learning Environments: A Study Based on Eye-Tracking Experiments</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/19</link>
	<description>Despite the increasing adoption of desktop virtual reality (VR) in higher education, the specific instructional efficacy of 3D interactive prompts remains inadequately understood. This study examines how such prompts&amp;amp;mdash;specifically dynamic spatial annotations and 3D animated demonstrations&amp;amp;mdash;influence learning outcomes within a desktop virtual learning environment (DVLE). Employing a quasi-experimental design integrated with eye-tracking and multimodal learning analytics, university students were assigned to either an experimental group (DVLE with 3D prompts) or a control group (basic DVLE) while completing physics tasks. Data collection encompassed eye-tracking metrics (fixation heatmaps, pupil diameter and dwell time), post-test performance (assessing knowledge comprehension and spatial problem-solving), and cognitive load ratings. Results indicated that the experimental group achieved significantly superior learning outcomes, particularly in spatial understanding and dynamic reasoning, alongside optimized visual attention patterns&amp;amp;mdash;characterized by shorter initial fixation latency and prolonged fixation on key 3D elements&amp;amp;mdash;and reduced cognitive load. Eye-tracking metrics were positively correlated with post-test scores, confirming that 3D prompts enhance learning by improving spatial attention guidance. These findings demonstrate that embedding 3D interactive prompts in DVLEs effectively directs visual attention, alleviates cognitive burden, and improves learning efficiency, offering valuable implications for the design of immersive educational settings.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-02-05</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 19: The Impact of 3D Interactive Prompts on College Students&amp;rsquo; Learning Outcomes in Desktop Virtual Learning Environments: A Study Based on Eye-Tracking Experiments</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/19">doi: 10.3390/jemr19010019</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Xinyi Wu
		Xiangen Wu
		Weixing Hu
		Jian Sun
		</p>
	<p>Despite the increasing adoption of desktop virtual reality (VR) in higher education, the specific instructional efficacy of 3D interactive prompts remains inadequately understood. This study examines how such prompts&amp;amp;mdash;specifically dynamic spatial annotations and 3D animated demonstrations&amp;amp;mdash;influence learning outcomes within a desktop virtual learning environment (DVLE). Employing a quasi-experimental design integrated with eye-tracking and multimodal learning analytics, university students were assigned to either an experimental group (DVLE with 3D prompts) or a control group (basic DVLE) while completing physics tasks. Data collection encompassed eye-tracking metrics (fixation heatmaps, pupil diameter and dwell time), post-test performance (assessing knowledge comprehension and spatial problem-solving), and cognitive load ratings. Results indicated that the experimental group achieved significantly superior learning outcomes, particularly in spatial understanding and dynamic reasoning, alongside optimized visual attention patterns&amp;amp;mdash;characterized by shorter initial fixation latency and prolonged fixation on key 3D elements&amp;amp;mdash;and reduced cognitive load. Eye-tracking metrics were positively correlated with post-test scores, confirming that 3D prompts enhance learning by improving spatial attention guidance. These findings demonstrate that embedding 3D interactive prompts in DVLEs effectively directs visual attention, alleviates cognitive burden, and improves learning efficiency, offering valuable implications for the design of immersive educational settings.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>The Impact of 3D Interactive Prompts on College Students&amp;amp;rsquo; Learning Outcomes in Desktop Virtual Learning Environments: A Study Based on Eye-Tracking Experiments</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Xinyi Wu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xiangen Wu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Weixing Hu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jian Sun</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19010019</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-02-05</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19010019</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/19</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/18">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 18: The Influence of Noise Perception and Parent-Rated Developmental Characteristics on White Noise Benefits in Children</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/18</link>
	<description>White noise has been proposed to enhance cognitive performance in children with ADHD, but findings are inconsistent, and benefits vary across tasks and individuals. Such variability suggests that diagnostic comparisons may overlook meaningful developmental differences. This exploratory study examined whether developmental characteristics and subjective evaluations of auditory and visual white noise predicted performance changes in two eye-movement tasks: Prolonged Fixation (PF) and Memory-Guided Saccades (MGS). Children with varying degrees of ADHD symptoms completed both tasks under noise and no-noise conditions, and noise benefit scores were calculated as the performance difference between conditions. Overall, white-noise effects were small and dependent on noise modality and task. In the PF task, large parent-rated perceptual difficulties and high visual noise discomfort were associated with improved performance under noise. In the MGS task, poor motor skills predicted visual noise benefit, whereas large visual noise discomfort predicted reduced noise benefit. These findings suggest that beneficial effects of white noise are influenced by developmental characteristics and subjective perception in task-dependent ways. The results highlight the need for individualized, transdiagnostic approaches in future noise research and challenge the notion of white noise as categorically beneficial for ADHD.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-02-05</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 18: The Influence of Noise Perception and Parent-Rated Developmental Characteristics on White Noise Benefits in Children</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/18">doi: 10.3390/jemr19010018</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Erica Jostrup
		Marcus Nyström
		Göran Söderlund
		Emma Claesdotter-Knutsson
		Peik Gustafsson
		Pia Tallberg
		</p>
	<p>White noise has been proposed to enhance cognitive performance in children with ADHD, but findings are inconsistent, and benefits vary across tasks and individuals. Such variability suggests that diagnostic comparisons may overlook meaningful developmental differences. This exploratory study examined whether developmental characteristics and subjective evaluations of auditory and visual white noise predicted performance changes in two eye-movement tasks: Prolonged Fixation (PF) and Memory-Guided Saccades (MGS). Children with varying degrees of ADHD symptoms completed both tasks under noise and no-noise conditions, and noise benefit scores were calculated as the performance difference between conditions. Overall, white-noise effects were small and dependent on noise modality and task. In the PF task, large parent-rated perceptual difficulties and high visual noise discomfort were associated with improved performance under noise. In the MGS task, poor motor skills predicted visual noise benefit, whereas large visual noise discomfort predicted reduced noise benefit. These findings suggest that beneficial effects of white noise are influenced by developmental characteristics and subjective perception in task-dependent ways. The results highlight the need for individualized, transdiagnostic approaches in future noise research and challenge the notion of white noise as categorically beneficial for ADHD.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>The Influence of Noise Perception and Parent-Rated Developmental Characteristics on White Noise Benefits in Children</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Erica Jostrup</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marcus Nyström</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Göran Söderlund</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Emma Claesdotter-Knutsson</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Peik Gustafsson</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Pia Tallberg</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19010018</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-02-05</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19010018</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/18</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/17">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 17: Eye Movement Classification Using Neuromorphic Vision Sensors</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/17</link>
	<description>Eye movement classification, particularly the identification of fixations and saccades, plays a vital role in advancing our understanding of neurological functions and cognitive processing. Conventional modalities of data, such as RGB webcams, often face limitations such as motion blur, latency and susceptibility to noise. Neuromorphic Vision Sensors, also known as event cameras (ECs), capture pixel-level changes asynchronously and at a high temporal resolution, making them well suited for detecting the swift transitions inherent to eye movements. However, the resulting data are sparse, which makes them less well suited for use with conventional algorithms. Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) are gaining attention due to their discrete spatio-temporal spike mechanism ideally suited for sparse data. These networks offer a biologically inspired computational paradigm capable of modeling the temporal dynamics captured by event cameras. This study validates the use of Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) with event cameras for efficient eye movement classification. We manually annotated the EV-Eye dataset, the largest publicly available event-based eye-tracking benchmark, into sequences of saccades and fixations, and we propose a convolutional SNN architecture operating directly on spike streams. Our model achieves an accuracy of 94% and a precision of 0.92 across annotated data from 10 users. As the first work to apply SNNs to eye movement classification using event data, we benchmark our approach against spiking baselines such as SpikingVGG and SpikingDenseNet, and additionally provide a detailed computational complexity comparison between SNN and ANN counterparts. Our results highlight the efficiency and robustness of SNNs for event-based vision tasks, with over one order of magnitude improvement in computational efficiency, with implications for fast and low-power neurocognitive diagnostic systems.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-02-04</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 17: Eye Movement Classification Using Neuromorphic Vision Sensors</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/17">doi: 10.3390/jemr19010017</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Khadija Iddrisu
		Waseem Shariff
		Maciej Stec
		Noel O’Connor
		Suzanne Little
		</p>
	<p>Eye movement classification, particularly the identification of fixations and saccades, plays a vital role in advancing our understanding of neurological functions and cognitive processing. Conventional modalities of data, such as RGB webcams, often face limitations such as motion blur, latency and susceptibility to noise. Neuromorphic Vision Sensors, also known as event cameras (ECs), capture pixel-level changes asynchronously and at a high temporal resolution, making them well suited for detecting the swift transitions inherent to eye movements. However, the resulting data are sparse, which makes them less well suited for use with conventional algorithms. Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) are gaining attention due to their discrete spatio-temporal spike mechanism ideally suited for sparse data. These networks offer a biologically inspired computational paradigm capable of modeling the temporal dynamics captured by event cameras. This study validates the use of Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) with event cameras for efficient eye movement classification. We manually annotated the EV-Eye dataset, the largest publicly available event-based eye-tracking benchmark, into sequences of saccades and fixations, and we propose a convolutional SNN architecture operating directly on spike streams. Our model achieves an accuracy of 94% and a precision of 0.92 across annotated data from 10 users. As the first work to apply SNNs to eye movement classification using event data, we benchmark our approach against spiking baselines such as SpikingVGG and SpikingDenseNet, and additionally provide a detailed computational complexity comparison between SNN and ANN counterparts. Our results highlight the efficiency and robustness of SNNs for event-based vision tasks, with over one order of magnitude improvement in computational efficiency, with implications for fast and low-power neurocognitive diagnostic systems.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Eye Movement Classification Using Neuromorphic Vision Sensors</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Khadija Iddrisu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Waseem Shariff</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Maciej Stec</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Noel O’Connor</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Suzanne Little</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19010017</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-02-04</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19010017</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/17</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/16">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 16: Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and Word Reading Fluency in Early School-Aged Children: A Pilot Eye-Tracking Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/16</link>
	<description>Fluent word reading is a key literacy skill, yet the full extent of the oculomotor underpinnings in developing readers remains unknown. Rapid automatized naming (RAN) is a useful clinical measure that has been shown to predict word reading fluency. Here we use RAN scores to predict early, mid, and late local stages of word reading as measured by eye tracking in children who are at a critical time in their literacy development. Thirty-three children participated in two RAN tasks (rapid letter naming (RLN) and rapid digit naming (RDN)) and an eye-tracking task, which included sentence-level reading with an embedded target word. The eye-tracking measures of first fixation duration, regression path duration, and total word reading time were used as early, mid, and late local measures, respectively. RLN and RDN significantly predicted only the mid-stage of the reading process (regression path duration). Faster RLN and RDN times were associated with briefer regressions from target words. Preliminary results link behavioral RAN performance to a mid-stage oculomotor variable, indicating that children with slower RAN times may exhibit longer regressions during reading, suggesting possible difficulties with the integration of phonological processing skills.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-02-04</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 16: Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and Word Reading Fluency in Early School-Aged Children: A Pilot Eye-Tracking Study</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/16">doi: 10.3390/jemr19010016</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Alisa Baron
		Alexia Martins
		Gavino Puggioni
		Vanessa Harwood
		</p>
	<p>Fluent word reading is a key literacy skill, yet the full extent of the oculomotor underpinnings in developing readers remains unknown. Rapid automatized naming (RAN) is a useful clinical measure that has been shown to predict word reading fluency. Here we use RAN scores to predict early, mid, and late local stages of word reading as measured by eye tracking in children who are at a critical time in their literacy development. Thirty-three children participated in two RAN tasks (rapid letter naming (RLN) and rapid digit naming (RDN)) and an eye-tracking task, which included sentence-level reading with an embedded target word. The eye-tracking measures of first fixation duration, regression path duration, and total word reading time were used as early, mid, and late local measures, respectively. RLN and RDN significantly predicted only the mid-stage of the reading process (regression path duration). Faster RLN and RDN times were associated with briefer regressions from target words. Preliminary results link behavioral RAN performance to a mid-stage oculomotor variable, indicating that children with slower RAN times may exhibit longer regressions during reading, suggesting possible difficulties with the integration of phonological processing skills.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and Word Reading Fluency in Early School-Aged Children: A Pilot Eye-Tracking Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Alisa Baron</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alexia Martins</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gavino Puggioni</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Vanessa Harwood</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19010016</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-02-04</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19010016</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/16</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/15">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 15: Analysis of Saccade Characteristics During Fusional Vergence Tests in Normal Binocular Vision Participants</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/15</link>
	<description>The purpose of the study was to analyze, characterize, and compare the measurements of saccades that occurred during the positive and negative fusional vergence test (PFV and NFV, respectively) as a function of the disparity vergence demand. Thirty-four participants&amp;amp;rsquo; PFV and NFV amplitudes were measured in a haploscopic setup, recording eye movements with an Eyelink 1000 Plus (SR Research). The visual stimulus was a column of letters. Break and recovery points were determined objectively offline, and saccades were detected with a velocity-threshold-based method. A total of 13,103 and 14,381 saccades were detected during the measurement of the PFV and NFV ranges, respectively. Saccades followed the main sequence (&amp;amp;rho; = 0.97, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). The distributions of saccadic amplitudes during PFV and NFV differed significantly (U = 4.28, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). The amplitude of saccades that occurred while fusion was maintained (median (IQR) 0.73 (0.92) deg) was significantly smaller than that of saccades during diplopia (2.10 (3.90) deg) (U = &amp;amp;minus;75.63, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). The distributions of saccade direction during the measurement of PFV and NFV amplitudes were statistically significantly different (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.01). These findings contribute to a better understanding of how the visual system adjusts saccades in response to different disparity vergence demand during fusional vergence amplitudes evaluation.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-02-03</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 15: Analysis of Saccade Characteristics During Fusional Vergence Tests in Normal Binocular Vision Participants</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/15">doi: 10.3390/jemr19010015</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Cristina Rovira-Gay
		Clara Mestre
		Marc Argilés
		Jaume Pujol
		</p>
	<p>The purpose of the study was to analyze, characterize, and compare the measurements of saccades that occurred during the positive and negative fusional vergence test (PFV and NFV, respectively) as a function of the disparity vergence demand. Thirty-four participants&amp;amp;rsquo; PFV and NFV amplitudes were measured in a haploscopic setup, recording eye movements with an Eyelink 1000 Plus (SR Research). The visual stimulus was a column of letters. Break and recovery points were determined objectively offline, and saccades were detected with a velocity-threshold-based method. A total of 13,103 and 14,381 saccades were detected during the measurement of the PFV and NFV ranges, respectively. Saccades followed the main sequence (&amp;amp;rho; = 0.97, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). The distributions of saccadic amplitudes during PFV and NFV differed significantly (U = 4.28, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). The amplitude of saccades that occurred while fusion was maintained (median (IQR) 0.73 (0.92) deg) was significantly smaller than that of saccades during diplopia (2.10 (3.90) deg) (U = &amp;amp;minus;75.63, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). The distributions of saccade direction during the measurement of PFV and NFV amplitudes were statistically significantly different (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.01). These findings contribute to a better understanding of how the visual system adjusts saccades in response to different disparity vergence demand during fusional vergence amplitudes evaluation.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Analysis of Saccade Characteristics During Fusional Vergence Tests in Normal Binocular Vision Participants</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Cristina Rovira-Gay</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Clara Mestre</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marc Argilés</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jaume Pujol</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19010015</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-02-03</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-03</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19010015</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/15</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/14">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 14: Visual Evaluation Strategies in Art Image Viewing: An Eye-Tracking Comparison of Art-Educated and Non-Art Participants</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/14</link>
	<description>Understanding how tacit knowledge embedded in visual materials is accessed and utilized during evaluation tasks remains a key challenge in human&amp;amp;ndash;computer interaction and visual expertise research. Although eye-tracking studies have identified systematic differences between experts and novices, findings remain inconsistent, particularly in art-related visual evaluation contexts. This study examines whether tacit aspects of visual evaluation can be inferred from gaze behavior by comparing individuals with and without formal art education. Visual evaluation was assessed using a structured, prompt-based task in which participants inspected artistic images and responded to items targeting specific visual elements. Eye movements were recorded using a screen-based eye-tracking system. Areas of Interest (AOIs) corresponding to correct-answer regions were defined a priori based on expert judgment and item prompts. Both AOI-level metrics (e.g., fixation count, mean, and total visit and gaze durations) and image-level metrics (e.g., fixation count, saccade count, and pupil size) were analyzed using appropriate parametric and non-parametric statistical tests. The results showed that participants with an art-education background produced more fixations within AOIs, exhibited longer mean and total AOI visit and gaze durations, and demonstrated lower saccade counts than participants without art education. These patterns indicate more systematic and goal-directed gaze behavior during visual evaluation, suggesting that formal art education may shape tacit visual evaluation strategies. The findings also highlight the potential of eye tracking as a methodological tool for studying expertise-related differences in visual evaluation processes.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-01-30</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 14: Visual Evaluation Strategies in Art Image Viewing: An Eye-Tracking Comparison of Art-Educated and Non-Art Participants</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/14">doi: 10.3390/jemr19010014</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Adem Korkmaz
		Sevinc Gülsecen
		Grigor Mihaylov
		</p>
	<p>Understanding how tacit knowledge embedded in visual materials is accessed and utilized during evaluation tasks remains a key challenge in human&amp;amp;ndash;computer interaction and visual expertise research. Although eye-tracking studies have identified systematic differences between experts and novices, findings remain inconsistent, particularly in art-related visual evaluation contexts. This study examines whether tacit aspects of visual evaluation can be inferred from gaze behavior by comparing individuals with and without formal art education. Visual evaluation was assessed using a structured, prompt-based task in which participants inspected artistic images and responded to items targeting specific visual elements. Eye movements were recorded using a screen-based eye-tracking system. Areas of Interest (AOIs) corresponding to correct-answer regions were defined a priori based on expert judgment and item prompts. Both AOI-level metrics (e.g., fixation count, mean, and total visit and gaze durations) and image-level metrics (e.g., fixation count, saccade count, and pupil size) were analyzed using appropriate parametric and non-parametric statistical tests. The results showed that participants with an art-education background produced more fixations within AOIs, exhibited longer mean and total AOI visit and gaze durations, and demonstrated lower saccade counts than participants without art education. These patterns indicate more systematic and goal-directed gaze behavior during visual evaluation, suggesting that formal art education may shape tacit visual evaluation strategies. The findings also highlight the potential of eye tracking as a methodological tool for studying expertise-related differences in visual evaluation processes.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Visual Evaluation Strategies in Art Image Viewing: An Eye-Tracking Comparison of Art-Educated and Non-Art Participants</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Adem Korkmaz</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sevinc Gülsecen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Grigor Mihaylov</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19010014</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-01-30</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19010014</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/14</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/13">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 13: Including Eye Movement in the Assessment of Physical Fatigue Under Different Loading Types and Road Slopes</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/13</link>
	<description>Background: Emergency rescuers frequently carry heavy equipment for extended periods, making musculoskeletal disorders a major occupational concern. Loading type and road slope play important roles in inducing physical fatigue; however, the assessment of physical fatigue under these conditions remains limited. Aim: This study aims to investigate physical fatigue under different loading types and road slope conditions using both electromyography (EMG) and eye movement metrics. In particular, this work focuses on eye movement metrics as a non-contact data source in comparison with EMG, which remains largely unexplored for physical fatigue assessment. Method: Prolonged load-bearing walking was simulated to replicate the physical demands experienced by emergency rescuers. Eighteen male participants completed experimental trials incorporating four loading types and three road slope conditions. Results: (1) Loading type and road slope significantly affected EMG activity, eye movement metrics, and perceptual responses. (2) Saccade time (ST), saccade speed (SS), and saccade amplitude (SA) exhibited significant differences in their rates of change across three stages defined by perceptual fatigue. ST, SS, and SA showed strong correlations with subjective fatigue throughout the entire load-bearing walking process, whereas pupil diameter demonstrated only a moderate correlation with subjective ratings. (3) Eye movement metrics were incorporated into multivariate quadratic regression models to quantify physical fatigue under different loading types and road slope conditions. Conclusions: These findings enhance the understanding of physical fatigue mechanisms by demonstrating the potential of eye movement metrics as non-invasive indicators for multidimensional fatigue monitoring in work environments involving varying loading types and road slopes.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-01-27</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 13: Including Eye Movement in the Assessment of Physical Fatigue Under Different Loading Types and Road Slopes</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/13">doi: 10.3390/jemr19010013</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Yixuan Wei
		Xueli Wen
		Shu Wang
		Lanyun Zhang
		Jianwu Chen
		Longzhe Jin
		</p>
	<p>Background: Emergency rescuers frequently carry heavy equipment for extended periods, making musculoskeletal disorders a major occupational concern. Loading type and road slope play important roles in inducing physical fatigue; however, the assessment of physical fatigue under these conditions remains limited. Aim: This study aims to investigate physical fatigue under different loading types and road slope conditions using both electromyography (EMG) and eye movement metrics. In particular, this work focuses on eye movement metrics as a non-contact data source in comparison with EMG, which remains largely unexplored for physical fatigue assessment. Method: Prolonged load-bearing walking was simulated to replicate the physical demands experienced by emergency rescuers. Eighteen male participants completed experimental trials incorporating four loading types and three road slope conditions. Results: (1) Loading type and road slope significantly affected EMG activity, eye movement metrics, and perceptual responses. (2) Saccade time (ST), saccade speed (SS), and saccade amplitude (SA) exhibited significant differences in their rates of change across three stages defined by perceptual fatigue. ST, SS, and SA showed strong correlations with subjective fatigue throughout the entire load-bearing walking process, whereas pupil diameter demonstrated only a moderate correlation with subjective ratings. (3) Eye movement metrics were incorporated into multivariate quadratic regression models to quantify physical fatigue under different loading types and road slope conditions. Conclusions: These findings enhance the understanding of physical fatigue mechanisms by demonstrating the potential of eye movement metrics as non-invasive indicators for multidimensional fatigue monitoring in work environments involving varying loading types and road slopes.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Including Eye Movement in the Assessment of Physical Fatigue Under Different Loading Types and Road Slopes</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Yixuan Wei</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xueli Wen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shu Wang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lanyun Zhang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jianwu Chen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Longzhe Jin</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19010013</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-01-27</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19010013</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/13</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/12">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 12: A Comparison of Centroid Tracking and Image Phase for Improved Optokinetic Nystagmus Detection</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/12</link>
	<description>Optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) is an involuntary sawtooth eye movement that occurs in the presence of a drifting stimulus. Our experience is that low-amplitude/short-duration OKN can challenge the limits of our commercially available Pupil Neon eye-tracker, leading to false negative OKN detection results. We sought to investigate whether such instances could be remediated. We compared automated OKN detection using: (1) the gaze signal from the Pupil Neon (OKN-G), (2) centroid tracking (OKN-C), and (3) an image-phase-based &amp;amp;ldquo;motion microscopy&amp;amp;rdquo; technique (OKN-MMIC). The OKN-C and OKN-MMIC methods were also tested as a remediated step after a negative OKN-G result (OKN-C-STEP, OKN-MMIC-STEP). To validate the approaches adults (n = 22) with normal visual acuity was measured whilst viewing trials of an OKN induction stimulus shown at four levels of visibility. Confusion matrices and performance measures were determined for a &amp;amp;ldquo;main&amp;amp;rdquo; dataset that included all methods, and a &amp;amp;ldquo;retest&amp;amp;rdquo; set, which contained instances where centroid tracking failed. For the main set, all tested methods improved upon OKN-G by Matthew&amp;amp;rsquo;s correlation coefficient (0.80&amp;amp;ndash;0.85 vs. 0.76), sensitivity (0.89&amp;amp;ndash;0.95 vs. 0.85), and accuracy (0.91&amp;amp;ndash;0.93 vs. 0.88); but only OKN-C yielded better specificity (0.90&amp;amp;ndash;0.96 vs. 0.95). For the retest set, MMIC and MMIC-STEP methods consistently improved upon the performance of OKN-G across all measures.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-01-26</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 12: A Comparison of Centroid Tracking and Image Phase for Improved Optokinetic Nystagmus Detection</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/12">doi: 10.3390/jemr19010012</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Jason Turuwhenua
		Mohammad Norouzifard
		Zaw LinTun
		Misty Edmonds
		Rebecca Findlay
		Joanna Black
		Benjamin Thompson
		</p>
	<p>Optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) is an involuntary sawtooth eye movement that occurs in the presence of a drifting stimulus. Our experience is that low-amplitude/short-duration OKN can challenge the limits of our commercially available Pupil Neon eye-tracker, leading to false negative OKN detection results. We sought to investigate whether such instances could be remediated. We compared automated OKN detection using: (1) the gaze signal from the Pupil Neon (OKN-G), (2) centroid tracking (OKN-C), and (3) an image-phase-based &amp;amp;ldquo;motion microscopy&amp;amp;rdquo; technique (OKN-MMIC). The OKN-C and OKN-MMIC methods were also tested as a remediated step after a negative OKN-G result (OKN-C-STEP, OKN-MMIC-STEP). To validate the approaches adults (n = 22) with normal visual acuity was measured whilst viewing trials of an OKN induction stimulus shown at four levels of visibility. Confusion matrices and performance measures were determined for a &amp;amp;ldquo;main&amp;amp;rdquo; dataset that included all methods, and a &amp;amp;ldquo;retest&amp;amp;rdquo; set, which contained instances where centroid tracking failed. For the main set, all tested methods improved upon OKN-G by Matthew&amp;amp;rsquo;s correlation coefficient (0.80&amp;amp;ndash;0.85 vs. 0.76), sensitivity (0.89&amp;amp;ndash;0.95 vs. 0.85), and accuracy (0.91&amp;amp;ndash;0.93 vs. 0.88); but only OKN-C yielded better specificity (0.90&amp;amp;ndash;0.96 vs. 0.95). For the retest set, MMIC and MMIC-STEP methods consistently improved upon the performance of OKN-G across all measures.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>A Comparison of Centroid Tracking and Image Phase for Improved Optokinetic Nystagmus Detection</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Jason Turuwhenua</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mohammad Norouzifard</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zaw LinTun</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Misty Edmonds</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rebecca Findlay</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Joanna Black</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Benjamin Thompson</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19010012</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-01-26</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-26</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19010012</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/12</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/11">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 11: Inspecting the Retina: Oculomotor Patterns and Accuracy in Fundus Image Interpretation by Novice Versus Experienced Eye Care Practitioners</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/11</link>
	<description>Visual search behavior, influenced by expertise, prior knowledge, training, and visual fatigue, is crucial in ophthalmic diagnostics. This study investigates differences in eye-tracking strategies between novice and experienced eye care practitioners during fundus image interpretation. Forty-seven participants, including 37 novices (first- to fourth-year optometry students) and 10 experienced optometrists (&amp;amp;ge;2 years of experience), viewed 20 fundus images (10 normal, 10 abnormal) while their eye movements were recorded using an Eyelink1000 Plus gaze tracker (2000 Hz). Diagnostic and laterality accuracy were assessed, and statistical analyses were conducted using Sigma Plot 12.0. Results showed that experienced practitioners had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (83 &amp;amp;plusmn; 6.3%) than novices (70 &amp;amp;plusmn; 12.9%, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.005). Significant differences in oculomotor behavior were observed, including median latency (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), while no significant differences were found in median peak velocity (p = 0.11) or laterality accuracy (p = 0.97). Diagnostic accuracy correlated with fixation count in novices (r = 0.54, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), while laterality accuracy correlated with total dwelling time (r = &amp;amp;minus;0.62, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.005). The experienced practitioners demonstrated systematic and focused visual search patterns, whereas the novices exhibited unorganized scan paths. Enhancing training with visual feedback could improve fundus image analysis accuracy in novice clinicians.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-01-21</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 11: Inspecting the Retina: Oculomotor Patterns and Accuracy in Fundus Image Interpretation by Novice Versus Experienced Eye Care Practitioners</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/11">doi: 10.3390/jemr19010011</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Suraj Upadhyaya
		</p>
	<p>Visual search behavior, influenced by expertise, prior knowledge, training, and visual fatigue, is crucial in ophthalmic diagnostics. This study investigates differences in eye-tracking strategies between novice and experienced eye care practitioners during fundus image interpretation. Forty-seven participants, including 37 novices (first- to fourth-year optometry students) and 10 experienced optometrists (&amp;amp;ge;2 years of experience), viewed 20 fundus images (10 normal, 10 abnormal) while their eye movements were recorded using an Eyelink1000 Plus gaze tracker (2000 Hz). Diagnostic and laterality accuracy were assessed, and statistical analyses were conducted using Sigma Plot 12.0. Results showed that experienced practitioners had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (83 &amp;amp;plusmn; 6.3%) than novices (70 &amp;amp;plusmn; 12.9%, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.005). Significant differences in oculomotor behavior were observed, including median latency (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), while no significant differences were found in median peak velocity (p = 0.11) or laterality accuracy (p = 0.97). Diagnostic accuracy correlated with fixation count in novices (r = 0.54, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), while laterality accuracy correlated with total dwelling time (r = &amp;amp;minus;0.62, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.005). The experienced practitioners demonstrated systematic and focused visual search patterns, whereas the novices exhibited unorganized scan paths. Enhancing training with visual feedback could improve fundus image analysis accuracy in novice clinicians.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Inspecting the Retina: Oculomotor Patterns and Accuracy in Fundus Image Interpretation by Novice Versus Experienced Eye Care Practitioners</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Suraj Upadhyaya</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19010011</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-01-21</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19010011</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/11</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/10">

	<title>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 10: Eye Movement Analysis: A Kernel Density Estimation Approach for Saccade Direction and Amplitude</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/10</link>
	<description>Eye movements are important indicators of problem-solving or solution strategies and are recorded using eye-tracking technologies. As they reveal how viewers interact with presented information during task processing, their analysis is crucial for educational research. Traditional methods for analyzing saccades, such as histograms or polar diagrams, are limited in capturing patterns in direction and amplitude. To address this, we propose a kernel density estimation approach that explicitly accounts for the data structure: for the circular distribution of saccade direction, we use the von Mises kernel, and for saccade amplitude, a Gaussian kernel. This yields continuous probability distributions that not only improve accuracy of representations but also model the underlying distribution of eye movements. This method enables the identification of strategies used during task processing and reveals the connections to the underlying cognitive processes. It allows for a deeper understanding of information processing during learning. By applying our new method to an empirical dataset, we uncovered differences in solution strategies that conventional techniques could not reveal. The insights gained can contribute to the development of more effective teaching methods, better tailored to the individual needs of learners, thereby enhancing their academic success.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-01-19</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 10: Eye Movement Analysis: A Kernel Density Estimation Approach for Saccade Direction and Amplitude</b></p>
	<p>Journal of Eye Movement Research <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/10">doi: 10.3390/jemr19010010</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Paula Fehlinger
		Bernhard Ertl
		Bianca Watzka
		</p>
	<p>Eye movements are important indicators of problem-solving or solution strategies and are recorded using eye-tracking technologies. As they reveal how viewers interact with presented information during task processing, their analysis is crucial for educational research. Traditional methods for analyzing saccades, such as histograms or polar diagrams, are limited in capturing patterns in direction and amplitude. To address this, we propose a kernel density estimation approach that explicitly accounts for the data structure: for the circular distribution of saccade direction, we use the von Mises kernel, and for saccade amplitude, a Gaussian kernel. This yields continuous probability distributions that not only improve accuracy of representations but also model the underlying distribution of eye movements. This method enables the identification of strategies used during task processing and reveals the connections to the underlying cognitive processes. It allows for a deeper understanding of information processing during learning. By applying our new method to an empirical dataset, we uncovered differences in solution strategies that conventional techniques could not reveal. The insights gained can contribute to the development of more effective teaching methods, better tailored to the individual needs of learners, thereby enhancing their academic success.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Eye Movement Analysis: A Kernel Density Estimation Approach for Saccade Direction and Amplitude</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Paula Fehlinger</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Bernhard Ertl</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Bianca Watzka</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/jemr19010010</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Journal of Eye Movement Research</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-01-19</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Journal of Eye Movement Research</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/jemr19010010</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/19/1/10</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
    
<cc:License rdf:about="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
</cc:License>

</rdf:RDF>
