Next Article in Journal
Sentinel Node Necrosis Is a Negative Prognostic Factor in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of 252 Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Are Those Who Need It Getting It?
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Budget Impact Analysis of a Breast Rapid Diagnostic Unit

by
M. Elmi
1,2,
H. Hussein
3,4,5,
S. Nofech-Mozes
1,
B. Curpen
3,4,
A. Leahey
1 and
Nicole J. Look Hong
1,2,*
1
Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room T2 102, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
2
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
3
Division of Breast Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
4
Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
5
Department of Medical Imaging, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2017, 24(3), 214-219; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3381
Submission received: 4 March 2017 / Revised: 6 April 2017 / Accepted: 6 May 2017 / Published: 1 June 2017

Abstract

Background: The Odette Cancer Centre’s recent implementation of a rapid diagnostic unit (RDU) for breast lesions has significantly decreased wait times to diagnosis. However, the economic impact of the unit remains unknown. This project defined the development and implementation costs and the operational costs of a breast RDU in a tertiary care facility. Methods: From an institutional perspective, a budget impact analysis identified the direct costs associated with the breast RDU. A base-case model was also used to calculate the cost per patient to achieve a diagnosis. Sensitivity analyses computed costs based on variations in key components. Costs are adjusted to 2015 valuations using health care–specific consumer price indices and are reported in Canadian dollars. Results: Initiation cost for the RDU was $366,243. The annual operational cost for support staff was $111,803. The average per-patient clinical cost for achieving a diagnosis was $770. Sensitivity analyses revealed that, if running at maximal institutional capacity, the total annual clinical cost for achieving a diagnosis could range between $136,080 and $702,675. Conclusions: Establishment and maintenance of a breast rdu requires significant investment to achieve reductions in time to diagnosis. Expenditures ought to be interpreted in the context of institutional patient volumes and trade-offs in patient-centred outcomes, including lessened patient anxiety and possibly shorter times to definitive treatment. Our study can be used as a resource-planning tool for future rdus in health care systems wishing to improve diagnostic efficiency.
Keywords: diagnostics; costs; breast cancer diagnostics; costs; breast cancer

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Elmi, M.; Hussein, H.; Nofech-Mozes, S.; Curpen, B.; Leahey, A.; Hong, N.J.L. Budget Impact Analysis of a Breast Rapid Diagnostic Unit. Curr. Oncol. 2017, 24, 214-219. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3381

AMA Style

Elmi M, Hussein H, Nofech-Mozes S, Curpen B, Leahey A, Hong NJL. Budget Impact Analysis of a Breast Rapid Diagnostic Unit. Current Oncology. 2017; 24(3):214-219. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elmi, M., H. Hussein, S. Nofech-Mozes, B. Curpen, A. Leahey, and Nicole J. Look Hong. 2017. "Budget Impact Analysis of a Breast Rapid Diagnostic Unit" Current Oncology 24, no. 3: 214-219. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3381

APA Style

Elmi, M., Hussein, H., Nofech-Mozes, S., Curpen, B., Leahey, A., & Hong, N. J. L. (2017). Budget Impact Analysis of a Breast Rapid Diagnostic Unit. Current Oncology, 24(3), 214-219. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3381

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop