Next Article in Journal
Psychological Processes Underlying an Omnivorous, Vegetarian, or Vegan Diet: Gender Role Self-Concept, Human Supremacy Beliefs, and Moral Disengagement from Meat
Next Article in Special Issue
Para Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) Feedstock for Livelihoods Opportunities in Southern Thailand: Analysis of Socioeconomic Productivity Potentials and Security
Previous Article in Journal
Quantifying Co-Benefits and Trade-Offs between Forest Ecosystem Services in the Gan River Basin of South China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Livelihood Capitals, Income Inequality, and the Perception of Climate Change: A Case Study of Small-Scale Cattle Farmers in the Ecuadorian Andes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Vulnerability of Maize Farming Systems to Climate Change: Farmers’ Opinions Differ about the Relevance of Adaptation Strategies

1
INRAE, UMR1248 AGIR, Université de Toulouse, F-31320 Castanet-Tolosan, France
2
INRAE, UR MIAT, Université de Toulouse, F-31320 Castanet-Tolosan, France
3
INPT ENSAT, UMR1248 AGIR, Université de Toulouse, F-31320 Castanet-Tolosan, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(14), 8275; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148275
Submission received: 19 May 2022 / Revised: 28 June 2022 / Accepted: 29 June 2022 / Published: 6 July 2022

Abstract

Climate change has negative impacts on maize cultivation in southwestern France, such as soil erosion and water stress. The vulnerability of maize farming systems to climate change must be assessed before considering potential adaptation strategies. This study focused on eliciting and understanding criteria that maize growers use to assess the vulnerability of their farming systems to climate change. To this end, we surveyed maize growers in two consecutive stages: a qualitative stage, to elicit vulnerability criteria, and a quantitative stage, to test the genericity of criteria related to the adaptation strategies. The qualitative stage identified 144 criteria that farmers used to assess vulnerability to climate change, while the quantitative stage showed that farmers’ opinions about the adaptation strategies differed. Many factors explained these differences, including structural (e.g., soil type) and psychological factors (e.g., interest in agroecology). Our typology of farmers revealed that their interest in agroecology and technology, as well as their perceptions of the risks of climate change and their attachment to their production systems, influence the type of adaptations they identify as relevant (i.e., intensification strategies, slight adjustments or agroecological innovations). Farmers’ perceptions should be considered when providing individual advice and assessing vulnerability, by including criteria related to their psychological characteristics.
Keywords: evaluation; vulnerability; maize grower; climate change; farmers’ perceptions; adaptation evaluation; vulnerability; maize grower; climate change; farmers’ perceptions; adaptation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Albert, M.; Bergez, J.-E.; Willaume, M.; Couture, S. Vulnerability of Maize Farming Systems to Climate Change: Farmers’ Opinions Differ about the Relevance of Adaptation Strategies. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148275

AMA Style

Albert M, Bergez J-E, Willaume M, Couture S. Vulnerability of Maize Farming Systems to Climate Change: Farmers’ Opinions Differ about the Relevance of Adaptation Strategies. Sustainability. 2022; 14(14):8275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148275

Chicago/Turabian Style

Albert, Marine, Jacques-Eric Bergez, Magali Willaume, and Stéphane Couture. 2022. "Vulnerability of Maize Farming Systems to Climate Change: Farmers’ Opinions Differ about the Relevance of Adaptation Strategies" Sustainability 14, no. 14: 8275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148275

APA Style

Albert, M., Bergez, J.-E., Willaume, M., & Couture, S. (2022). Vulnerability of Maize Farming Systems to Climate Change: Farmers’ Opinions Differ about the Relevance of Adaptation Strategies. Sustainability, 14(14), 8275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148275

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop