Vulnerable populations include low-income individuals and families, ethnic minorities living in rural areas, older adults, and people with disabilities [1]. The population at risk for chronic diseases may experience daily social, physical, economic, and environmental challenges [2]. Advancing health services for vulnerable populations by reducing avoidable disparities and ensuring equitable access to high-quality, culturally responsive care is paramount [3].
In this Special Issue, Advancing Health Services for Vulnerable Populations, including those with chronic conditions, we bring together 11 papers that address key challenges in healthcare delivery. As outlined in the call for papers, these contributions examine risk factors, self-management, and health service delivery for populations who frequently fall through gaps in healthcare systems. The studies are geographically diverse, spanning Australia, the United States, Switzerland, and Sudan, and methodologically broad, ranging from big-data analyses to qualitative interviews. Collectively, they deliver a coherent message: improving outcomes for vulnerable populations requires sustained attention to comorbidities, barriers to access, and context-specific interventions.
- At-Risk Population Tends to Have Poorer Health Outcomes
This at-risk population not only experiences a burden of multiple co-existing comorbidities but also experiences disproportionately poorer health outcomes, including a higher rate of disease progression, increased morbidity and mortality, and greater reliance on healthcare services [4]. Evidence from Ben Zvi et al.’s (contribution 1) analysis of a U.S. hospital database demonstrates that patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) who also have comorbidities, such as sepsis, stroke, or kidney disease, have a significantly increased likelihood of major amputation and in-hospital mortality. Rodwell’s Australian survey data similarly show that health problems worsened physical function and reduced work ability, all of which predicted future hospital admission among adults living alone (contribution 2).
- Challenges for Healthcare Systems
With aging populations and their growing impact on healthcare systems, vulnerable groups are increasingly affected. Many countries face escalating health and social challenges, including chronic diseases. These trends place substantial strain on healthcare systems through rising costs, increased demand for services, and workforce shortages [5,6].
The challenges are further compounded by global inequities. For example, Gebril et al. (contribution 3) highlight the need for future investigations into local risk factors (e.g., tobacco, viruses) in head-and-neck tumors, as well as the importance of building capacity through the establishment of a national cancer registry in Sudan (contribution 3). Such infrastructure, including registries and a routine data collection system, is as crucial as the interventions themselves. This global perspective complements findings from the Australian and North American studies by underscoring that health systems strengthening (spanning data infrastructure, workforce capacity, and service delivery) remains a fundamental requirement, particularly in resource-constrained and vulnerable settings.
- Complex Needs Require Innovative Interventions
Patients living with multiple comorbid conditions often present with complex and interrelated healthcare needs, necessitating coordinated, integrated, and person-centered models of care to ensure effective management, improve health outcomes, and optimize the use of healthcare resources [7]. The care needs to be focused on the patient’s voice and experience. For example, Gulliver et al.’s study reported that cancer survivors voiced “difficulties around access to and management of services for both their mental and physical health” (contribution 4). Similarly, Sanjida et al. reported that health professionals expressed their concerns about communication (language, health literacy, and understanding of cancer pathways), cultural safety (trust, privacy, and racism), and service access (especially during transitions between care levels) (contribution 5).
Our published papers highlight that there is a gap between optimal care and real-world practice. For example, Watt et al.’s clinical audit in Queensland hospitals in Australia revealed a striking mismatch that although 90% of elderly inpatients who fell met the criteria for a CT head scan, only half actually received one (contribution 6). Liddle et al. reported that remote Aboriginal communities value the holistic, culturally responsive care offered by their community clinics, but worry about high staff turnover (contribution 7). Notably, community members showed pragmatism by accepting rotated or job-sharing nurses and doctors if this helped build trust and continuity. These findings jointly suggest that policies and programs must be tailored to local contexts and realities.
- Diverse Methods and Future Research
Methodologically, this Special Issue is impressively diverse. We see large-scale quantitative studies (contribution 1, contribution 2), longitudinal cohorts studies (contribution 8), registry analytics (Sudan’s National Cancer Institute data), and mixed-methods projects (contribution 9, contribution 7), as well as a narrative review (contribution 5). However, longitudinal tracking (beyond Rodwell’s work) (contribution 2) and experimental trials are relatively rare. For instance, we still need prospective studies to test whether the interventions suggested by stakeholders (better food access, telehealth, workforce incentives) actually improve health outcomes. Editorially, we note that future research could build on these mixed methods. For example, this could include piloting an integrated primary-care model in an Aboriginal community clinic or formally evaluating a produce voucher program with control groups. In sum, combining big data analytics with on-the-ground engagement offers a holistic view but also invites the next step of ‘what works’.
Looking ahead, these published papers point to clear priorities. First, we must translate insights into policy and practice. For example, the finding that DFU patients with sepsis or heart attack have the worst prognosis suggests prioritizing them for multidisciplinary foot clinics or early surgery. The CT-scan audit suggests revising the Post-Fall pathway or training to ensure no high-risk older patient is missed (contribution 6). Second, interventions should be co-designed with communities. Stakeholder and user feedback indicates that top-down solutions will falter if they ignore cultural or contextual nuances. Third, we need to address social determinants alongside medical care. Chronic disease care cannot be siloed from issues like poverty and the environment. Fourth, capacity building in low-resource settings is essential. Finally, each paper highlights questions for future study. How can we scale up allied-health access for isolated patients? Will expanding the Indigenous health workforce measurably improve cancer outcomes? Could routine functionality checks avert hospitalizations in lonely seniors? These questions, and more, suggest a rich agenda.
This Special Issue demonstrates both progress and remaining work. Progress is evident in the new data and innovative interventions. Yet the “action gap” is also clear, as vulnerabilities persist when health systems are under-resourced or fragmented. We hope these papers inspire continued interdisciplinary effort, bringing together clinicians, public health specialists, community leaders, and researchers, to turn evidence into equity. As editors, we thank the authors for their contributions and look forward to seeing how the field builds on this foundation to better serve those most in need of care.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, C.-J.W., X.-Y.H. and L.F.; Writing—original draft preparation, C.-J.W. and X.-Y.H.; Writing—review and editing, C.-J.W., X.-Y.H. and L.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This editorial paper received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
List of Contributions
- Ben Zvi, L.; Maman, D.; Margulis, M.; Berkovich, Y. Predictors of Major Amputation and Mortality in Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Retrospective Nationwide Inpatient Sample Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 1387.
- Rodwell, J. Cumulative health drivers of overnight hospitalization for Australian working-age adults living alone: The early warning potential of functionality. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14707
- Gebril, M.A.B.; Mukhtar, W.N.O.; Elhassan, M.M.A.; Mahmoud, I. Incidence characteristics and histological types of head and neck cancer among adults in Central Sudan: A retrospective study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13814
- Gulliver, A.; Morse, A.R.; Banfield, M. Cancer Survivors’ Experiences of Navigating the Australian Health Care System for Physical and Mental Health Care Needs. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3988.
- Sanjida, S.; Garvey, G.; Ward, J.; Bainbridge, R.; Shakeshaft, A.; Hadikusumo, S.; Nelson, C.; Thilakaratne, P.; Hou, X.Y. Indigenous Australians’ experiences of cancer care: A narrative literature review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16947.
- Watt, I.; Devin, R.; Bhattacharya, J.; Waldie, F.; Holden, E.; Wu, C.-J. A clinical audit of the use of CT head scan post-inpatient falls in hospitalised older adults utilising a post-fall clinical pathway. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 1098.
- Liddle, Z.; Fitts, M.S.; Bourke, L.; Murakami-Gold, L.; Campbell, N.; Russell, D.J.; Mathew, S.; Bonson, J.; Mulholland, E.; Humphreys, J.S.; et al. Attitudes to short-term staffing and workforce priorities of community users of remote Aboriginal community-controlled health services: A qualitative study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 482.
- De Ridder, D.; Uppal, A.; Rouzinov, S.; Lamour, J.; Zaballa, M.-E.; Baysson, H.; Joost, S.; Stringhini, S.; Guessous, I.; Nehme, M. SARS-CoV-2 infection and the risk of new chronic conditions: Insights from a longitudinal population-based study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 166.
- Law, K.K.; Trieu, K.; Madz, J.; Coyle, D.H.; Glover, K.; Tian, M.; Xin, Y.; Simmons, D.; Wong, J.; Wu, J.H. Stakeholder perspectives on the acceptability, design, and integration of produce prescriptions for people with type 2 diabetes in Australia: A formative study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 1330.
- Dalmau-Bueno, A.; Albert-Ballestar, S.; Mansilla, R.; García-Altés, A. Health Status and Use of Healthcare Services of Undocumented Migrant Sex Workers in Catalonia: A Descriptive Study Using Administrative Registries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 1696.
- Pebley, K.; Toll, B.A.; Carpenter, M.J.; Silvestri, G.; Rojewski, A.M. Gain-Framed Text Messages and Nicotine Replacement Therapy for Smoking Cessation Among Lung Cancer Screening Patients: A Brief Report of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 543.
References
- Clark, B.; Preto, N. Exploring the concept of vulnerability in health care. CMAJ Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2018, 190, E308–E309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amboree, T.L.; Montealegre, J.R.; Fujimoto, K.; Mgbere, O.; Darkoh, C.; Wermuth, P.P. Exploring Preventive Healthcare in a High-Risk Vulnerable Population. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rad, J. Health inequities: A persistent global challenge from past to future. Int. J. Equity Health 2025, 24, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- NIHR Evidence. Multiple Long-Term Conditions (Multimorbidity) and Inequality- Addressing the Challenge: Insights from Research 2023. Available online: https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/collection/multiple-long-term-conditions-multimorbidity-and-inequality-addressing-the-challenge-insights-from-research/ (accessed on 12 February 2026).
- Khan, H.T.A.; Addo, K.M.; Findlay, H. Public health challenges and responses to the growing ageing populations. Public Health Chall. 2024, 3, e213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Endalamaw, A.; Zewdie, A.; Wolka, E.; Assefa, Y. Care models for individuals with chronic multimorbidity: Lessons for low- and middle-income countries. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2024, 24, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- OECD. Does Healthcare Deliver? Living with Multiple Chronic Conditions—Results from the Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS); Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris, France, 2025; Available online: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/02/does-healthcare-deliver_978507f1/full-report/living-with-multiple-chronic-conditions_0275c435.html (accessed on 15 December 2025).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.