Next Article in Journal
Laser Er:YAG-Assisted Debonding May Be a Viable Alternative to the Conventional Method for Monocrystalline Ceramic Brackets
Previous Article in Journal
Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Classrooms at the University of the Basque Country through a User-Informed Natural Ventilation Demonstrator
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 21
10.3390/ijerph192114562
Review Report
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Variation in Road Dust Heavy Metal Concentration, Pollution, and Health Risk with Distance from the Factories in a City–Industry Integration Area, China

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(21), 14562; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114562
by Yinan Chen 1,2, Zhiqiang Hu 1,*, He Bai 3 and Wei Shen 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(21), 14562; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114562
Submission received: 24 September 2022 / Revised: 27 October 2022 / Accepted: 28 October 2022 / Published: 6 November 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors, in attached file you will found my comments. Kind regards, Reviewer

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript can be accepted.

Author Response

Thank you for your approval, we have studied the paper carefully again and have made details correction, especially for the "Conclusions" and "Reference". Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. 

Best wishes !

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper by Chen et al. represents a qualitative scientific work but have few mistakes and unanswered questions. I have few objections. Conclusion’s part needs to be more precisely written with less numbers (repetition of results) and more concluded remarks. At the end, I am wondering about references. This topic is actual in other parts of the world not only in China. I encourage authors to revise their references and put some references from other parts of the world. Therefore, I recommend acceptation of the paper with minor revision.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. We have studied the paper carefully again and have made details correction which we hope to meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. 

Best wishes !

Back to TopTop