Elia, R.; Maruccia, M.; Di Summa, P.G.; Trisciuzzi, R.; Lovero, G.; Cazzato, G.; Lacitignola, L.; Staffieri, F.; Crovace, A.M.
Conventional Versus Regenerative Methods for Wound Healing: A Comparative Experimental Study on a Sheep Model. Medicina 2024, 60, 1836.
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111836
AMA Style
Elia R, Maruccia M, Di Summa PG, Trisciuzzi R, Lovero G, Cazzato G, Lacitignola L, Staffieri F, Crovace AM.
Conventional Versus Regenerative Methods for Wound Healing: A Comparative Experimental Study on a Sheep Model. Medicina. 2024; 60(11):1836.
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111836
Chicago/Turabian Style
Elia, Rossella, Michele Maruccia, Pietro Giovanni Di Summa, Rodrigo Trisciuzzi, Giuditta Lovero, Gerardo Cazzato, Luca Lacitignola, Francesco Staffieri, and Alberto Maria Crovace.
2024. "Conventional Versus Regenerative Methods for Wound Healing: A Comparative Experimental Study on a Sheep Model" Medicina 60, no. 11: 1836.
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111836
APA Style
Elia, R., Maruccia, M., Di Summa, P. G., Trisciuzzi, R., Lovero, G., Cazzato, G., Lacitignola, L., Staffieri, F., & Crovace, A. M.
(2024). Conventional Versus Regenerative Methods for Wound Healing: A Comparative Experimental Study on a Sheep Model. Medicina, 60(11), 1836.
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111836