Next Article in Journal
Supernatants of Water Extraction–Ethanol Precipitation from Roots of Rosa davurica Pall. Ameliorate Ulcerative Colitis in Mice: From Gut Microbes to Metabolites
Previous Article in Journal
Trimetazidine in Chronic Coronary Syndrome and Coronary Artery Disease: A Narrative Review of Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Current Guideline Position
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Contemporary Landscape of Active Clinical Trials in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A ClinicalTrials.gov–Based Narrative Review with a Scoping Approach

by
Laura Radoš
1,†,
Sara Matulić Čubranić
1,†,
Marin Golčić
1,2,*,
Iva Skočilić
1,2,
Ivana Mikolašević
1,3 and
Andrej Belančić
4
1
Tumor Clinic, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
2
Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
3
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
4
Department of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19(9), 1371; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19091371 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 19 July 2026 / Revised: 19 August 2026 / Accepted: 23 August 2026 / Published: 30 August 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies, with limited survival gains despite advances in systemic therapy. However, rapid expansion of biomarker-directed therapies, immunotherapy, and novel treatment modalities has created an increasingly complex clinical trial landscape. We aimed to characterize contemporary PDAC clinical development and identify emerging therapeutic trends. Methods: We performed a narrative review with a scoping approach of active PDAC clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Eligible studies were initiated between January 1, 2021, and February 16, 2026, and included recruiting, active, or not-yet-recruiting phase I–III trials. Data extracted included trial phase, disease setting, therapeutic strategy, endpoints, enrollment, sponsorship, and late-phase development. Results: A total of 355 interventional trials were included. Most trials were phase I, phase I/II, or phase II trials, with fewer than 10% being evaluated in phase II/III or phase III development. Advanced or metastatic disease was the predominant setting. Chemotherapy remained the most frequently incorporated treatment modality, while molecularly targeted therapies were evaluated in 167 trials. KRAS/RAS-directed approaches represented the largest targeted subgroup, although only daraxonrasib and setidegrasib reached phase III evaluation. Immunotherapy was evaluated in 139 trials, although only a limited number progressed to late-phase development, reflecting the immune-resistant biology of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Additional areas of active investigation included Claudin 18.2-targeted therapies, MTAP-associated approaches, homologous recombination deficiency-directed strategies, CD73 inhibition, radiotherapy, local interventions, surgery-focused optimization, imaging-guided approaches, and supportive-care interventions. Industry organizations were listed as the lead sponsor for approximately half of all studies, while non-commercial organizations supported most remaining trials. Conclusions: The contemporary PDAC clinical trial landscape is characterized by broad therapeutic diversification but limited late-phase maturity. Chemotherapy remains the dominant treatment backbone, whereas KRAS/RAS-directed therapies have emerged as the most advanced precision oncology strategy. Future progress will likely depend on successful integration of biomarker-selected therapies with established multidisciplinary treatment approaches, including optimized systemic therapy, local-control strategies, and supportive care.
Keywords: PDAC; precision oncology; chemotherapy; KRAS inhibition; clinical trials PDAC; precision oncology; chemotherapy; KRAS inhibition; clinical trials

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Radoš, L.; Matulić Čubranić, S.; Golčić, M.; Skočilić, I.; Mikolašević, I.; Belančić, A. Contemporary Landscape of Active Clinical Trials in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A ClinicalTrials.gov–Based Narrative Review with a Scoping Approach. Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19, 1371. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19091371

AMA Style

Radoš L, Matulić Čubranić S, Golčić M, Skočilić I, Mikolašević I, Belančić A. Contemporary Landscape of Active Clinical Trials in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A ClinicalTrials.gov–Based Narrative Review with a Scoping Approach. Pharmaceuticals. 2026; 19(9):1371. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19091371

Chicago/Turabian Style

Radoš, Laura, Sara Matulić Čubranić, Marin Golčić, Iva Skočilić, Ivana Mikolašević, and Andrej Belančić. 2026. "Contemporary Landscape of Active Clinical Trials in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A ClinicalTrials.gov–Based Narrative Review with a Scoping Approach" Pharmaceuticals 19, no. 9: 1371. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19091371

APA Style

Radoš, L., Matulić Čubranić, S., Golčić, M., Skočilić, I., Mikolašević, I., & Belančić, A. (2026). Contemporary Landscape of Active Clinical Trials in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A ClinicalTrials.gov–Based Narrative Review with a Scoping Approach. Pharmaceuticals, 19(9), 1371. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19091371

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop