Skip to Content
SensorsSensors
  • Article
  • Open Access

7 November 2026

22 Pages

Joint-Gated Continual Learning for Roadheader-Mounted Millimeter-Wave Radar Range Prediction in a Coal Mine

,
,
,
,
and
1
School of Emergency Technology and Command, University of Emergency Management, Beijing 101601, China
2
Institute of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
3
Chengdu Aerospace Communication Equipment Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610052, China
4
School of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
Sensors2026, 26(21), 7051;https://doi.org/10.3390/s26217051 
(registering DOI)
This article belongs to the Section Radar Sensors

Abstract

Coal-mine excavation generates dust and water mist that impair optical sensing; millimeter-wave radar supports surrounding-range perception for assisted autonomous guidance, while changing conditions can cause predictor mismatch and unfavorable online updates. This paper proposes a joint-gated continual learning framework that integrates temporal-evolution context with observation–prediction consistency for selective adaptation. The temporal context characterizes local measurement dynamics and determines a state-conditioned residual tolerance; together with prediction innovation, it regulates parameter updates and online-memory insertion. Observation-stream evolution is decoupled from model adaptation, so measurements rejected for learning remain available to subsequent prediction, preserving information continuity while suppressing unstable updates. A lightweight regression predictor with bounded memory enables continual operation under limited resources. Experiments on field radar data and controlled disturbances show 1.35% lower MAE than a fixed predictor and 2.55% lower RMSE than independently source-tuned consistency-only adaptation, with a 0.09 mm MAE increase and updates decreasing from 94.83% to 85.51%. At matched learning rates, RMSE decreases by 0.63 mm versus consistency-only and 0.28 mm versus approximately rate-matched random thinning. RMSE was 206.76 mm versus 204.63 mm for Fixed, while the frozen GRU and Transformer achieved lower MAE and RMSE. At k=8, 99.11% of injected learning values are rejected. The framework supports efficient continuous sidewall-range prediction and model maintenance for assisted autonomous roadheader guidance in dust- and mist-affected excavation environments.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.