Skip to Content
SensorsSensors
  • Review
  • Open Access

19 April 2017

23 Pages

Recent Developments in Fiber Optics Humidity Sensors

,
,
and
1
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Public University of Navarra, Pamplona 31006, Spain
2
Institute of Smart Cities, Public University of Navarra, Pamplona 31006, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Humidity Sensors

Abstract

A wide range of applications such as health, human comfort, agriculture, food processing and storage, and electronic manufacturing, among others, require fast and accurate measurement of humidity. Sensors based on optical fibers present several advantages over electronic sensors and great research efforts have been made in recent years in this field. The present paper reports the current trends of optical fiber humidity sensors. The evolution of optical structures developed towards humidity sensing, as well as the novel materials used for this purpose, will be analyzed. Well-known optical structures, such as long-period fiber gratings or fiber Bragg gratings, are still being studied towards an enhancement of their sensitivity. Sensors based on lossy mode resonances constitute a platform that combines high sensitivity with low complexity, both in terms of their fabrication process and the equipment required. Novel structures, such as resonators, are being studied in order to improve the resolution of humidity sensors. Moreover, recent research on polymer optical fibers suggests that the sensitivity of this kind of sensor has not yet reached its limit. Therefore, there is still room for improvement in terms of sensitivity and resolution.

1. Introduction

Humidity has an important influence on several industrial processes such as electronic, food or pharmaceutical manufacturing, food storage, etc. All these processes, which can be affected by humidity, require continuous monitoring of air humidity. In addition, proper humidity levels can be critical to the quality of the product and having the right humidity level can contribute to diminishing energy consumption [1].
Optical fiber humidity sensors (OFHSs) offer several advantages over electronic humidity sensors such as miniature design, durability, the possibility of working on flammable environments and at higher temperature and pressure ranges, and, most important, their electromagnetic immunity. Therefore, they can withstand the kind of harsh and demanding conditions found in industrial processes.
However, there are some facts that have prevented OFHSs from being a common commercial product. The fabrication of optical fiber sensors is not yet a sufficiently repeatable process to become a serial fabrication product. Some optical structures have a certain degree of uncertainty inherent to the fabrication process. However, the main inconvenience is related to the cost of optical equipment. Halogen white light sources and standard optical fibers can be found on the market at affordable prices, but spectrometers, optical spectrum analyzers (OSA), and other optical equipment have relegated OFHSs to specific applications where there is no other option, as detailed below.
Great research efforts have been made in recent years and results have been generated for various applications. The accurate measurement of relative humidity (RH) is critical in some industries, such as the semiconductor industry, where the performance of fabricated devices is dependent on the humidity [2], as well as in the electronics industry. Recently, another application for these OFHSs has been found in high-energy physics (HEP), in experiments performed at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) [3,4].
More application fields can be found, some of them related to structural health monitoring, which is an important case where relative humidity (RH) sensors can find application [5,6,7,8]. OFHSs offer the possibility of monitoring civil engineering structures, using, for instance, fiber Bragg gratings (FBG) [6,7], or even obtaining distributed measurements for large structures combining Optical Time Domain Reflectometry (OTDR) with chemically sensitive water swellable polymers (hydrogels) [9]. In addition, the FBG sensors mentioned above have the potential to act as road parameter sensors (humidity, ice, temperature, etc.) [7]. Another application found for distributed measurement is for tunnel leakage detection [10]. The possibility of making distributed measurements is one of the strongest advantages of OFHS [11,12]. Another sector where this kind of sensor is useful is food processing and storage [6]. Furthermore, humidity control is essential for the correct storage of valuable artwork, such as in museums or archives [2].
Apart from the aforementioned applications, continuous RH measurement and control is important for human comfort such as in air-conditioning monitoring and achieving controlled hygienic conditions [6]. In addition, OFHSs have found new applications in clinical treatment due to the need for humidification of inspired gases in critical respiratory care [13,14].
The present paper reports the current trends of optical fiber humidity sensors. Novel optical structures, as well as recently studied materials, will be analyzed and commented on. Then, a detailed analysis of OFHSs based on lossy mode resonances will be made. This kind of sensor occupies a unique position alongside optical fiber sensors due to its relatively simple fabrication process and high sensitivity to the surrounding medium refractive index (SMRI). Finally, some concluding remarks about the sensing performance of all these sensors will be expounded.

3. Optical Fiber Humidity Sensors Based on Lossy Mode Resonances

The first time dealing with lossy mode resonances (LMR), these were confused with surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [94], but, despite its similarities, important differences can be distinguished between the phenomena. What makes them similar is that both are electromagnetic resonances that generate an attenuation band on the transmitted spectrum. However, in SPRs there is energy transference from light to free electrons of the noble metal, whereas in LMRs the light is coupled with the coating. Another difference is the possibility of being observed on the transverse magnetic (TM) and transverse electric (TE) modes, which might simplify the required setup and number of materials available for LMR generation, which broadens the application of LMR-based sensors. The possibility of generating several attenuation bands at tunable wavelengths is another advantage of LMRs. However, one of the most relevant factors that make LMRs a good choice for optical fiber sensors development is their ability to generate an optical phenomenon that can be detected by the wavelength detection method with the same material that acts as the sensitive layer to the parameter to be measured.
The structure of a LMR-based device consists of a waveguide, which allows for accessing the evanescent field, coated with a thin film of the appropriate material. The condition for LMR generation is that the real part of the thin film permittivity is positive and higher in magnitude than both its own imaginary part and the real part of the material surrounding the thin film [95]. LMRs are generated when there is a resonant coupling of light to modes guided in the external coating. Figure 17 shows the fundamental mode (HE1,1) confined in the fiber core except at 1420 nm, where a fraction of the power transmitted by the core mode is coupled to the thin film, generating the LMR. It also shows one cladding mode (TE1,1) that is confined at the cladding at 1690 nm, but is guided through the coating for wavelengths smaller than 1420 nm [96].
Figure 17. Electric field intensity in the transversal section of D-shaped optical fiber coated with ITO. The fundamental mode HE1,1 and the first mode that experiences a transition to guidance in the overlay (TE1,1), are analyzed for different wavelengths. Reprinted from [96] with permission from Elsevier.
Several materials, including metal oxides such as ITO [97], SnO2 [98,99], In2O3 [100], TiO2 [95] or polymers such as poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH) and poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) [101], have been tested and checked for LMR generation. The large amount of available materials enables the development of optical fiber sensors for a wide range of applications [63,102,103,104,105]. Besides the research on the appropriate materials, LMR supporting structures have evolved and they have been studied on a wide range of optical fibers.
The first LMR-based devices were developed on plastic-clad silica (PCS) optical fiber (200 µm diameter). Then, by chemically removing the cladding the evanescent field becomes accessible, which is one of the requirements for LMR generation. ITO was the first material tested and was coated by dip-coating [102], but other metallic oxides have been studied, such as tin dioxide [106]. The results obtained by this combination (LMR generated by tin dioxide and PCS) show a sensitivity of 0.1 nm/RH% in the range from 20% to 80%RH [106]. Adding an external layer, which is sensitive to humidity, the sensitivity of the device improves, reaching values around 1 nm/%RH [97]. Characterization of this last device is shown in Figure 18.
Figure 18. Spectral response of the (a) non-tuned and (b) tuned sensors for 20% and 90%RH. Dynamical response of the sensors to changes in the RH of the external medium (c) non-tuned sensor and (d) tuned sensor (non-tuned sensor (20 PAH/PAA bilayers) and tuned sensor (100 PAH/PAA bilayers)). Reprinted from [97] with permission from Elsevier.
A method to decrease the resonance width and increase the sensitivity of LMR-based sensors is currently being studied [96,99,107]. Side polished optical fibers enable distinguishing between the TM and the TE modes of the LMR [108], obtaining a narrower attenuation band. Moreover, working with the fundamental mode provides better sensitivity than working with several modes [96,108,109].
Therefore, using a SMF improves the previously obtained sensitivities. Different approaches can be followed when working with SMF such as using side polished optical fibers, tapered optical fibers, or cladding etched SMF (CE-SMF). The first two methods have been used for the development of several kinds of sensors [63,101]. The latter has been recently studied towards humidity sensing [99]. Etching the cladding of a SMF with hydrofluoric acid (HF) reduces the cladding diameter, allowing the interaction with the evanescent field.
Two different materials have been tested with CE-SMF structure, indium oxide [100] and tin oxide [99]. Both transparent conductive oxides meet the requirements for LMR generation. The real part of the refractive index of tin oxide is slightly greater, increasing the sensitivity of the final device [99]. The wavelength of the LMR shifts more than 30 nm for RH changes from 20% to 90% when working with indium oxide. The LMR generated by tin oxide has a sensitivity of 1.9 nm/%RH for the same range of RH. Static and dynamic characterization of this sensor is plotted in Figure 19. In addition, this optical structure has an unnoticeable cross thermal sensitivity. High linearity and low hysteresis are other characteristics of this kind of sensor.
Figure 19. (a) Optical spectrum of the SnO2 coated CE-SMF for different RH values; (b) characterization of the LMR wavelength as a function of RH for different temperatures; (c) LMR wavelength and RH as a function of time for different temperatures. Reprinted from [99] with permission from Elsevier.
An interesting comparison between SMS and LMR was developed in [110] by coating a SMS and a PCS (200 µm diameter) with a combination of titanium (IV) oxide nanoparticles (TiO2) and poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS). When comparing the sensitivity to relative humidity changes, the LMR-based device shows a tenfold improvement compared to the SMS-based device. Therefore, it is proved that it is better to use an LMR-based device if high sensitivity is needed. However, the SMS structure provides narrower attenuation bands than LMR generated onto PCS fibers. In any case, coating the SMS structure with the thin film provides better sensitivity than the naked SMS.
LMRs can be combined with another optical phenomenon such as Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR). This was demonstrated by using the Layer-by-Layer nano-assembly (LbL) method to develop a polymeric coating loaded with Ag nanoparticles (Ag NPs) onto an optical fiber [111]. The LSPR band showed a slight intensity variation with RH changes but no significant wavelength dependence was observed. Therefore, the LSPR band can be used as a reference wavelength. Furthermore, the polymeric coating with silver nanoparticles is twice as sensitive (0.943 nm per %RH) to RH changes than the polymeric overlay only (0.44 nm per %RH).
This paper has tried to encompass the most recent and relevant research papers involving optical fiber humidity sensors. The main optical structures used for that purpose were briefly explained, intending to provide a complete guide of recent developments in this application field. Table 1 summarizes some of the most relevant results.
Table 1. Summary of the most relevant results found for the interval 2010–2016.

4. Conclusions

There are several ways to measure relative humidity by optical setups and by OFHS and several application fields where this kind of sensor can be exploited, such as radiation environments or watertight containers, or for example vacuum-packed foods, where other sensors might alter the environment and distort the measurement. Although there are structures that have not been analyzed, some interesting conclusions can be extracted from those that have been explained here.
Novel materials, understood as novel nanostructured materials (nanotubes, quantum dot), are still appearing and show promising properties for humidity sensing. Polymeric coatings and inorganic salts might present nonlinear behavior, especially at high relative humidity values, where they have their greatest sensitivity. Metal oxides and semiconductor oxides seem to be a good choice for obtaining linear responses and good sensitivity in the 20%–90%RH range. Their response times are usually shorter than those of water-swelling materials.
With regard to optical structures, there should be an agreement between the desired spectral width of the attenuation band and its dynamic range. Another important factor that must be taken into account is the complexity of the required fabrication process. Modal interferometers developed by splicing together different kind of fibers represent the largest number of publications in recent years. In addition, polymeric optical fibers and photonic crystal fibers have shown their strength for optical fiber sensor development.
FBGs and LPFGs require specific equipment for inscribing the grating onto the optical fiber. They are not too sensitive to external parameters by themselves and need an external coating besides the grating. However, recent research has demonstrated that improved sensitivities can be obtained with these optical structures. Moreover, they compensate for their small dynamical range with their high resolution.
For LMRs, a previous process is required to access the evanescent field. This process is simpler than that required for writing a grating and usually consists of a chemical method to partially or completely remove the cladding. LMRs allow for generating an attenuation band with the same material that will act as a sensitive layer, simplifying the process of obtaining an optical fiber humidity sensor.
Finally, Fabry-Pérot interferometers, developed by coating the tip of an optical fiber, seem to be a good choice to obtain optical fiber humidity sensors because of their good performance and the relative ease of obtaining them. They are also a less invasive way to measure with optical fibers. The highest sensitivity found in this review corresponds to this optical structure dealing with hygroscopic materials.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a Public University of Navarra PhD fellowship and by the Spanish Economy and Competitiveness Ministry TEC2016-79367-C2-2-R Research Grant.

Author Contributions

J.A. and J.C. selected the bibliography and decided the scheme for the review. J.A. wrote the paper. J.C., I.R.M., and F.J.A. revised the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schirmer, M.; Hussein, W.B.; Jekle, M.; Hussein, M.A.; Becker, T. Impact of air humidity in industrial heating processes on selected quality attributes of bread rolls. J. Food Eng. 2011, 105, 647–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Kolpakov, S.; Gordon, N.; Mou, C.; Zhou, K. Toward a New Generation of Photonic Humidity Sensors. Sensors 2014, 14, 3986–4013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Consales, M.; Buosciolo, A.; Cutolo, A.; Breglio, G.; Irace, A.; Buontempo, S.; Petagna, P.; Giordano, M.; Cusano, A. Fiber optic humidity sensors for high-energy physics applications at CERN. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 159, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Berruti, G.; Consales, M.; Giordano, M.; Sansone, L.; Petagna, P.; Buontempo, S.; Breglio, G.; Cusano, A. Radiation hard humidity sensors for high energy physics applications using polyimide-coated fiber Bragg gratings sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 177, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Sikarwar, S.; Yadav, B.C. Opto-electronic humidity sensor: A review. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2015, 233, 54–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Alwis, L.; Sun, T.; Grattan, K.T.V. Optical fibre-based sensor technology for humidity and moisture measurement: Review of recent progress. Measurement 2013, 46, 4052–4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Li, H.-N.; Li, D.-S.; Song, G.-B. Recent applications of fiber optic sensors to health monitoring in civil engineering. Eng. Struct. 2004, 26, 1647–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Majumder, M.; Gangopadhyay, T.K.; Chakraborty, A.K.; Dasgupta, K.; Bhattacharya, D.K. Fibre Bragg gratings in structural health monitoring–Present status and applications. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2008, 147, 150–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Michie, W.C.; Culshaw, B.; Konstantaki, M.; McKenzie, I.; Kelly, S.; Graham, N.B.; Moran, C. Distributed pH and water detection using fiber-optic sensors and hydrogels. J. Light. Technol. 1995, 13, 1415–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bremer, K.; Meinhardt-Wollweber, M.; Thiel, T.; Werner, G.; Sun, T.; Grattan, K.T.V.; Roth, B. Sewerage tunnel leakage detection using a fibre optic moisture-detecting sensor system. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2014, 220, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Thomas, P.J.; Hellevang, J.O. A fully distributed fibre optic sensor for relative humidity measurements. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 247, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Kharaz, A.; Jones, B.E. A distributed optical-fibre sensing system for multi-point humidity measurement. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 1995, 47, 491–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Hernandez, F.U.; Morgan, S.P.; Hayes-Gill, B.R.; Harvey, D.; Kinnear, W.; Norris, A.; Evans, D.; Hardman, J.G.; Korposh, S. Characterization and Use of a Fiber Optic Sensor Based on PAH/SiO2 Film for Humidity Sensing in Ventilator Care Equipment. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2016, 63, 1985–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Battista, L.; Scorza, A.; Botta, F.; Sciuto, S.A. A novel fiber-optic measurement system for the evaluation of performances of neonatal pulmonary ventilators. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2016, 27, 25704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Lokman, A.; Nodehi, S.; Batumalay, M.; Arof, H.; Ahmad, H.; Harun, S.W. Optical fiber humidity sensor based on a tapered fiber with hydroxyethylcellulose/polyvinylidenefluoride composite. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2014, 56, 380–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Luo, Y.; Chen, C.; Xia, K.; Peng, S.; Guan, H.; Tang, J.; Lu, H.; Yu, J.; Zhang, J.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, Z. Tungsten disulfide (WS_2) based all-fiber-optic humidity sensor. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 8956–8966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  17. Xiao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Cai, X.; Tan, S.; Yu, J.; Lu, H.; Luo, Y.; Liao, G.; Li, S.; Tang, J.; Chen, Z. Reduced graphene oxide for fiber-optic humidity sensing. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 31555–31567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. Aneesh, R.; Khijwania, S.K. Zinc oxide nanoparticle based optical fiber humidity sensor having linear response throughout a large dynamic range. Appl. Opt. 2011, 50, 5310–5314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  19. Zhao, Z.; Duan, Y. A low cost fiber-optic humidity sensor based on silica sol–gel film. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 160, 1340–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Zhang, Z.F.; Zhang, Y. Humidity sensor based on optical fiber attached with hydrogel spheres. Opt. Laser Technol. 2015, 74, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Hill, K.O.; Meltz, G. Fiber Bragg Grating Technology Fundamentals and Overview. J. Light. Technol. 1997, 15, 1263–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Zhou, Z.; Liu, W.; Huang, Y.; Wang, H.; Jianping, H.; Huang, M.; Jinping, O. Optical fiber Bragg grating sensor assembly for 3D strain monitoring and its case study in highway pavement. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2012, 28, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Markos, C.; Stefani, A.; Nielsen, K.; Rasmussen, H.K.; Yuan, W.; Bang, O. High-Tg TOPAS microstructured polymer optical fiber for fiber Bragg grating strain sensing at 110 degrees. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 4758–4765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Woyessa, G.; Fasano, A.; Stefani, A.; Markos, C.; Nielsen, K.; Rasmussen, H.K.; Bang, O. Single mode step-index polymer optical fiber for humidity insensitive high temperature fiber Bragg grating sensors. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 1253–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. David, N.A.; Wild, P.M.; Djilali, N. Parametric study of a polymer-coated fibre-optic humidity sensor. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2012, 23, 35103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Yan, G.; Liang, Y.; Lee, E.-H.; He, S. Novel Knob-integrated fiber Bragg grating sensor with polyvinyl alcohol coating for simultaneous relative humidity and temperature measurement. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 15624–15634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  27. Woyessa, G.; Nielsen, K.; Stefani, A.; Markos, C.; Bang, O. Temperature insensitive hysteresis free highly sensitive polymer optical fiber Bragg grating humidity sensor. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 1206–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Swanson, A.J.; Raymond, S.G.; Janssens, S.; Breukers, R.D.; Bhuiyan, M.D.H.; Lovell-Smith, J.W.; Waterland, M.R. Development of novel polymer coating for FBG based relative humidity sensing. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2016, 249, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Gu, B.; Yin, M.; Zhang, A.P.; Qian, J.; He, S. Optical fiber relative humidity sensor based on FBG incorporated thin-core fiber modal interferometer. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 4140–4146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  30. Korenko, B.; Rothhardt, M.; Hartung, A.; Bartelt, H. Novel Fiber-Optic Relative Humidity Sensor with Thermal Compensation. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 5450–5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Lin, Y.; Gong, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wu, H. Polyimide-coated fiber Bragg grating for relative humidity sensing. Photonic Sensors 2015, 5, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Wang, Y.; Shen, C.; Lou, W.; Shentu, F.; Zhong, C.; Dong, X.; Tong, L. Fiber optic relative humidity sensor based on the tilted fiber Bragg grating coated with graphene oxide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 31107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Shivananju, B.N.; Yamdagni, S.; Fazuldeen, R.; Kumar, A.K.S.; Nithin, S.P.; Varma, M.M.; Asokan, S. Highly Sensitive Carbon Nanotubes Coated Etched Fiber Bragg Grating Sensor for Humidity Sensing. IEEE Sens. J. 2014, 14, 2615–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Correia, S.F.H.; Antunes, P.; Pecoraro, E.; Lima, P.P.; Varum, H.; Carlos, L.D.; Ferreira, R.A.S.; André, P.S. Optical Fiber Relative Humidity Sensor Based on a FBG with a Di-Ureasil Coating. Sensors 2012, 12, 8847–8860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. James, S.W.; Tatam, R.P. Optical fibre long-period grating sensors: Characteristics and application. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2003, 14, R49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Kersey, A.D.; Davis, M.A.; Patrick, H.J.; LeBlanc, M.; Koo, K.P.; Askins, C.G.; Putnam, M.A.; Friebele, E.J. Fiber grating sensors. J. Light. Technol. 1997, 15, 1442–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Consales, M.; Berruti, G.; Borriello, A.; Giordano, M.; Buontempo, S.; Breglio, G.; Makovec, A.; Petagna, P.; Cusano, A. Nanoscale TiO_2-coated LPGs as radiation-tolerant humidity sensors for high-energy physics applications. Opt. Lett. 2014, 39, 4128–4131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  38. Vengsarkar, A.M.; Lemaire, P.J.; Judkins, J.B.; Bhatia, V.; Erdogan, T.; Sipe, J.E. Long-period fiber gratings as band-rejection filters. J. Light. Technol. 1996, 14, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Venugopalan, T.; Sun, T.; Grattan, K.T.V. Long period grating-based humidity sensor for potential structural health monitoring. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2008, 148, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Cusano, A.; Iadicicco, A.; Pilla, P.; Contessa, L.; Campopiano, S.; Cutolo, A.; Giordano, M. Mode transition in high refractive index coated long period gratings. Opt. Express 2006, 14, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  41. Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, M.; Tu, D.; Mao, X.; Liao, Y. Long-Period Grating Relative Humidity Sensor with Hydrogel Coating. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2007, 19, 880–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Tan, K.M.; Tay, C.M.; Tjin, S.C.; Chan, C.C.; Rahardjo, H. High relative humidity measurements using gelatin coated long-period grating sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 110, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Konstantaki, M.; Pissadakis, S.; Pispas, S.; Madamopoulos, N.; Vainos, N.A. Optical fiber long-period grating humidity sensor with poly(ethylene oxide)/cobalt chloride coating. Appl. Opt. 2006, 45, 4567–4571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Viegas, D.; Goicoechea, J.; Corres, J.M.; Santos, J.L.; Ferreira, L.A.; Araújo, F.M.; Matias, I.R. A fibre optic humidity sensor based on a long-period fibre grating coated with a thin film of SiO2 nanospheres. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2009, 20, 34002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Fu, M.-Y.; Lin, G.-R.; Liu, W.-F.; Wu, C. Fiber-optic humidity sensor based on an air-gap long period fiber grating. Opt. Rev. 2011, 18, 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Urrutia, A.; Goicoechea, J.; Ricchiuti, A.L.; Barrera, D.; Sales, S.; Arregui, F.J. Simultaneous measurement of humidity and temperature based on a partially coated optical fiber long period grating. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 227, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Jackson, D.A.; Kersey, A.D.; Corke, M.; Jones, J.D.C. Pseudoheterodyne detection scheme for optical interferometers. Electron. Lett. 1982, 18, 1081–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Yu, F.T.S.; Yin, S. (Eds.) Fiber Optic Sensors, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  49. Frazão, O.; Caldas, P.; Araújo, F.M.; Ferreira, L.A.; Santos, J.L. Optical flowmeter using a modal interferometer based on a single nonadiabatic fiber taper. Opt. Lett. 2007, 32, 1974–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  50. Wu, Q.; Semenova, Y.; Mathew, J.; Wang, P.; Farrell, G. Humidity sensor based on a single-mode hetero-core fiber structure. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36, 1752–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  51. Wang, Y.; Shen, C.; Lou, W.; Shentu, F. Fiber optic humidity sensor based on the graphene oxide/PVA composite film. Opt. Commun. 2016, 372, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Jones, J.D.C. Interferometry and polarimetry for optical sensing. In Handbook of Optical Fibre Sensing Technology; López-Higuera, J.M., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex, UK, 2002; pp. 227–245. [Google Scholar]
  53. Villatoro, J.; Finazzi, V.; Badenes, G.; Pruneri, V. Highly Sensitive Sensors Based on Photonic Crystal Fiber Modal Interferometers. J. Sensors 2009, 2009, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Bjarklev, A.; Broeng, J.; Bjarklev, A.S. Photonic Crystal Fibres; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  55. Russell, P.S.J. Photonic-Crystal Fibers. J. Light. Technol. 2006, 24, 4729–4749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Lopez-Torres, D.; Elosua, C.; Villatoro, J.; Zubia, J.; Rothhardt, M.; Schuster, K.; Arregui, F.J. Photonic crystal fiber interferometer coated with a PAH/PAA nanolayer as humidity sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 242, 1065–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Noor, M.Y.M.; Kassim, N.M.; Supaat, A.S.M.; Ibrahim, M.H.; Azmi, A.I.; Abdullah, A.S.; Peng, G.D. Temperature-insensitive photonic crystal fiber interferometer for relative humidity sensing without hygroscopic coating. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2013, 24, 105205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Mathew, J.; Semenova, Y.; Farrell, G. Experimental demonstration of a high-sensitivity humidity sensor based on an Agarose-coated transmission-type photonic crystal fiber interferometer. Appl. Opt. 2013, 52, 3884–3890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  59. Mathew, J.; Semenova, Y.; Farrell, G. Effect of coating thickness on the sensitivity of a humidity sensor based on an Agarose coated photonic crystal fiber interferometer. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  60. Li, T.; Dong, X.; Chan, C.C.; Ni, K.; Zhang, S.; Shum, P.P. Humidity Sensor with a PVA-Coated Photonic Crystal Fiber Interferometer. IEEE Sens. J. 2013, 13, 2214–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Corres, J.M.; Arregui, F.J.; Matías, I.R. Sensitivity optimization of tapered optical fiber humidity sensors by means of tuning the thickness of nanostructured sensitive coatings. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007, 122, 442–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Corres, J.M.; Bravo, J.; Matias, I.R.; Arregui, F.J. Nonadiabatic tapered single-mode fiber coated with humidity sensitive nanofilms. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2006, 18, 935–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Socorro, A.B.; del Villar, I.; Corres, J.M.; Arregui, F.J.; Matias, I.R. Tapered Single-Mode Optical Fiber pH Sensor Based on Lossy Mode Resonances Generated by a Polymeric Thin-Film. IEEE Sens. J. 2012, 12, 2598–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Tan, Y.; Sun, L.-P.; Jin, L.; Li, J.; Guan, B.-O. Temperature-Insensitive Humidity Sensor Based on a Silica Fiber Taper Interferometer. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2013, 25, 2201–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Fu, H.; Jiang, Y.; Ding, J.; Zhang, J. Low Temperature Cross-Sensitivity Humidity Sensor Based on a U-Shaped Microfiber Interferometer. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 644–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Rota-Rodrigo, S.; Pérez-Herrera, R.; Lopez-Aldaba, A.; López Bautista, M.C.; Esteban, O.; López-Amo, M. Nanowire humidity optical sensor system based on fast Fourier transform technique. Proc. SPIE 2015, 9634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Soltanian, M.R.K.; Sharbirin, A.S.; Ariannejad, M.M.; Amiri, I.S.; De La Rue, R.M.; Brambilla, G.; Rahman, B.M.A.; Grattan, K.T.V.; Ahmad, H. Variable Waist-Diameter Mach–Zehnder Tapered-Fiber Interferometer as Humidity and Temperature Sensor. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 5987–5992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Wang, Y.; Shen, C.; Lou, W.; Shentu, F. Polarization-dependent humidity sensor based on an in-fiber Mach-Zehnder interferometer coated with graphene oxide. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 234, 503–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Hu, P.; Dong, X.; Ni, K.; Chen, L.H.; Wong, W.C.; Chan, C.C. Sensitivity-enhanced Michelson interferometric humidity sensor with waist-enlarged fiber bitaper. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 194, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Silva, S.; Pachon, E.G.P.; Franco, M.A.R.; Hayashi, J.G.; Malcata, F.X.; Frazão, O.; Jorge, P.; Cordeiro, C.M.B. Ultrahigh-sensitivity temperature fiber sensor based on multimode interference. Appl. Opt. 2012, 51, 3236–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  71. An, J.; Jin, Y.; Sun, M.; Dong, X. Relative Humidity Sensor Based on SMS Fiber Structure with Two Waist-Enlarged Tapers. IEEE Sens. J. 2014, 14, 2683–2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Miao, Y.; Ma, X.; He, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Song, B.; Liu, B.; Yao, J. Low-temperature-sensitive relative humidity sensor based on tapered square no-core fiber coated with SiO2 nanoparticles. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2016, 29, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Xue, L.-L.; Yang, L. Sensitivity enhancement of RI sensor based on SMS fiber structure with high refractive index overlay. J. Light. Technol. 2012, 30, 1463–1469. [Google Scholar]
  74. Del Villar, I.; Socorro, A.B.; Corres, J.M.; Arregui, F.J.; Matias, I.R. Optimization of Sensors Based on Multimode Interference in Single-Mode–Multimode–Single-Mode Structure. J. Light. Technol. 2013, 31, 3460–3468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  75. Socorro, A.B.; del Villar, I.; Corres, J.M.; Arregui, F.J.; Matias, I.R. Mode transition in complex refractive index coated single-mode–multimode–single-mode structure. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 12668–12682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  76. Hernández, G. Fabry–Pérot Interferometers; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  77. Ascorbe, J.; Corres, J.; Arregui, F.J.; Matias, I.R.; Mukhopadhyay, S.C. High Sensitivity Optical Structures for Relative Humidity Sensing. In Sensors for Everyday Life; Mukhopadhyay, I.R., Postolache, O.A., Jayasundera, K.P., Swain, A.K., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Gewerbestrasse, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 55–79. [Google Scholar]
  78. Morimoto, T.; Nagao, M.; Tokuda, F. Relation between the amounts of chemisorbed and physisorbed water on metal oxides. J. Phys. Chem. 1969, 73, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Huang, C.; Xie, W.; Lee, D.; Qi, C.; Yang, M.; Wang, M.; Tang, J. Optical Fiber Humidity Sensor with Porous TiO2/SiO2/TiO2 Coatings on Fiber Tip. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2015, 27, 1495–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  80. Huang, C.; Xie, W.; Yang, M.; Dai, J.; Zhang, B.; Member, S. Optical Fiber Fabry–Pérot Humidity Sensor Based on Porous Al2O3 Film. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2015, 27, 2127–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  81. Santos, J.S.; Raimundo, I.M.; Cordeiro, C.M.B.; Biazoli, C.R.; Gouveia, C.A.J.; Jorge, P.A.S. Characterisation of a Nafion film by optical fibre Fabry–Perot interferometry for humidity sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 196, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  82. Wang, C.; Zhou, B.; Jiang, H.; He, S. Agarose Filled Fabry–Perot Cavity for Temperature Self-Calibration Humidity Sensing. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2016, 28, 2027–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  83. Zhao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, D.; Yang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Shi, S.; Shu, X.; Liu, C. Nonreciprocal Phase Error Caused by Orthogonal Magnetic Field in a Polarization-Maintaining Fiber-Optic Gyro. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 5128–5132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. Short, S.X.; De Arruda, J.U.; Tselikov, A.A.; Blake, J.N. Elimination of birefringence induced scale factor errors in the in-line Sagnac interferometer current sensor. J. Light. Technol. 1998, 16, 1844–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  85. Culshaw, B. The optical fibre Sagnac interferometer: An overview of its principles and applications. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2006, 17, R1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  86. Wang, J.; Liang, H.; Dong, X.; Jin, Y. A Temperature-Insensitive Relative Humidity Sensor by using Polarization Maintaining Fiber-Based Sagnac Interferometer. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2013, 55, 2305–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  87. Sun, L.-P.; Li, J.; Jin, L.; Ran, Y.; Guan, B.-O. High-birefringence microfiber Sagnac interferometer based humidity sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 231, 696–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  88. Zheng, Y.; Dong, X.; Zhao, C.; Li, Y.; Shao, L.; Jin, S. Relative Humidity Sensor Based on Microfiber Loop Resonator. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2013, 2013, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  89. Wu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Rao, Y.; Gong, Y. Miniature interferometric humidity sensors based on silica/polymer microfiber knot resonators. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 155, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. Wang, P.; Gu, F.; Zhang, L.; Tong, L. Polymer microfiber rings for high-sensitivity optical humidity sensing. Appl. Opt. 2011, 50, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  91. Ma, Q.; Huang, L.; Guo, Z.; Rossmann, T. Spectral shift response of optical whispering-gallery modes due to water vapor adsorption and desorption. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2010, 21, 115206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  92. Mallik, A.K.; Liu, D.; Kavungal, V.; Wu, Q.; Farrell, G.; Semenova, Y. Agarose coated spherical micro resonator for humidity measurements. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 21216–21227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  93. Mehrabani, S.; Kwong, P.; Gupta, M.; Armani, A.M. Hybrid microcavity humidity sensor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 241101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  94. Hernáez, M.; Zamarreño, C.R.; Matías, I.R.; Arregui, F.J. Optical fiber humidity sensor based on surface plasmon resonance in the infra-red region. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2009, 178, 12019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  95. Hernáez, M.; del Villar, I.; Zamarreño, C.R.; Arregui, F.J.; Matias, I.R. Optical fiber refractometers based on lossy mode resonances supported by TiO2 coatings. Appl. Opt. 2010, 49, 3980–3985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  96. Arregui, F.J.; del Villar, I.; Zamarreño, C.R.; Zubiate, P.; Matias, I.R. Giant sensitivity of optical fiber sensors by means of lossy mode resonance. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 232, 660–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  97. Zamarreño, C.R.; Hernaez, M.; del Villar, I.; Matias, I.R.; Arregui, F.J. Tunable humidity sensor based on ITO-coated optical fiber. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 146, 414–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  98. Sanchez, P.; Zamarreño, C.R.; Hernaez, M.; Matias, I.R.; Arregui, F.J. Optical fiber refractometers based on Lossy Mode Resonances by means of SnO2 sputtered coatings. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 202, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  99. Ascorbe, J.; Corres, J.M.; Matias, I.R.; Arregui, F.J. High sensitivity humidity sensor based on cladding-etched optical fiber and lossy mode resonances. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 233, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  100. Ascorbe, J.; Corres, J.M.; Matias, I.R.; Arregui, F.J. Humidity sensor based on lossy mode resonances on an etched single mode fiber. In Proceedings of the 2015 9th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST), Auckland, New Zealand, 8–10 December 2015; pp. 365–368. [Google Scholar]
  101. Zubiate, P.; Zamarreño, C.R.; del Villar, I.; Matias, I.R.; Arregui, F.J. D-shape optical fiber pH sensor based on Lossy Mode Resonances ( LMRs ). In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Sensors, Busan, Korea, 1–4 November 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  102. Sanchez, P.; Zamarreño, C.R.; Hernaez, M.; del Villar, I.; Fernandez-Valdivielso, C.; Matias, I.R.; Arregui, F.J. Lossy mode resonances toward the fabrication of optical fiber humidity sensors. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2012, 23, 14002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  103. Ascorbe, J.; Corres, J.M.; Arregui, F.J.; Matias, I.R. Optical Fiber Current Transducer Using Lossy Mode Resonances for High Voltage Networks. J. Light. Technol. 2015, 33, 2504–2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  104. Corres, J.M.; Ascorbe, J.; Arregui, F.J.; Matias, I.R. Tunable electro-optic wavelength filter based on lossy-guided mode resonances. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 31668–31677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  105. Tiwari, D.; Mullaney, K.; Korposh, S.; James, S.W.; Lee, S.-W.; Tatam, R.P. An ammonia sensor based on Lossy Mode Resonances on a tapered optical fibre coated with porphyrin-incorporated titanium dioxide. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 242, 645–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  106. Sanchez, P.; Zamarreño, C.R.; Hernaez, M.; del Villar, I.; Matias, I.R.; Arregui, F.J. Humidity sensor fabricated by deposition of SnO2 layers onto optical fibers. Proc. SPIE 2013, 8794, 236–242. [Google Scholar]
  107. Socorro, A.B.; del Villar, I.; Corres, J.M.; Matias, I.R.; Arregui, F.J. Lossy mode resonances dependence on the geometry of a tapered monomode optical fiber. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2012, 180, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  108. Zubiate, P.; Zamarreno, C.R.; del Villar, I.; Matias, I.R.; Arregui, F.J. Experimental Study and Sensing Applications of Polarization-Dependent Lossy Mode Resonances Generated by D-Shape Coated Optical Fibers. J. Light. Technol. 2015, 33, 2412–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  109. Ruiz Zamarreño, C.; Zubiate, P.; Sagües, M.; Matias, I.R.; Arregui, F.J. Experimental demonstration of lossy mode resonance generation for transverse-magnetic and transverse-electric polarizations. Opt. Lett. 2013, 38, 2481–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  110. Socorro, A.B.; Hernaez, M.; del Villar, I.; Corres, J.M.; Arregui, F.J.; Matias, I.R. Single-mode—multimode—single-mode and lossy mode resonance-based devices: A comparative study for sensing applications. Microsyst. Technol. 2016, 22, 1633–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  111. Rivero, P.J.; Urrutia, A.; Goicoechea, J.; Arregui, F.J. Optical fiber humidity sensors based on Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR) and Lossy-mode resonance (LMR) in overlays loaded with silver nanoparticles. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 173, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.