Next Article in Journal
A Bayesian Framework with Dirichlet Priors and Spatial Smoothing for Protein Rotamer Prediction
Previous Article in Journal
From Fly to Human: Translational Relevance of Drosophila Models in the Study of Vitamin B6 and Cancer Relationship
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

From Regeneration to Analgesia: The Role of BPC-157 in Tissue Repair and Pain Management

1
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, Christ’s College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
2
Joint Vitality Institute, Sonora, CA 95370, USA
3
Pain Management Department, Hospital Zambrano Helión, Monterrey, Nuevo León 66278, Mexico
4
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX 77030, USA
5
Department of Anesthesiology, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA
6
Aurora Life, Grand Cayman KY1-1209, Cayman Islands
7
Boomerang Healthcare, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA
8
Division of Pain, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(6), 2876; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062876
Submission received: 1 February 2026 / Revised: 11 March 2026 / Accepted: 21 March 2026 / Published: 22 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pain: From Bench to Bedside)

Abstract

Body Protective Compound-157 (BPC-157) is a synthetic pentadecapeptide derived from gastric proteins that has demonstrated notable reparative and anti-inflammatory properties across diverse preclinical models. Experimental evidence reveals that BPC-157 supports angiogenesis, collagen synthesis, fibroblast activity, and modulation of nitric oxide pathways, contributing to enhanced healing of muscle, tendon, ligament, bone, and gastrointestinal tissue. Studies also report reduced inflammatory cytokine activity, improved microvascular integrity, and beneficial effects on pain modulation through peripheral and dopaminergic mechanisms. Although animal data indicate favorable safety and pharmacokinetics, human research remains limited to small pilot studies investigating musculoskeletal pain, interstitial cystitis, and intravenous administration, all suggesting potential therapeutic value without reported major adverse effects. However, inconsistent preparation standards, limited clinical validation, and regulatory restrictions underscore the need for rigorous controlled trials. BPC-157 remains a promising candidate for regenerative medicine, yet comprehensive evaluation is required before clinical translation can be recommended.

1. Introduction

The push to find effective and biologically suitable interventions in pain management has become a priority in recent years. This is particularly pressing given concerns around the adverse effects of pharmacotherapies and the emerging obsolescence of opioid analgesics. Regenerative medicine and related biomaterials present a potential alternative, having recently shown positive results in improving effectiveness and biocompatibility by directly acting on cellular and molecular pathways necessary for wound healing and tissue regeneration [1,2].
Researchers have dedicated significant efforts towards developing safe and effective therapies to promote healing while introducing limited to no adverse effects. The focus has been particularly directed towards peptides due to their natural occurrence. Biologics derived from these peptides are expected to not only reduce risks and adverse effects but also improve treatment efficacy through efficient metabolism and precise molecular targeting [3,4,5]. Several regenerative modalities have already demonstrated varying levels of therapeutic success in treating back pain due to lumbar degenerative disc disease, knee osteoarthritis, tendinitis, rotator cuff injury, and chronic neuropathic pain due to nerve inflammation [1,6,7,8]. Further, some biologics—including platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC)—have shown potential for dual-action therapies, featuring not only direct action on wound healing pathways but also antibacterial and antifungal properties to support an effective and efficient recovery [5,9,10,11].
This review will focus on Body Protective Compound-157 (BPC-157), a synthetic peptide isolated from gastric juice [12]. First introduced in 1993, BPC-157 is a fragment consisting of 15 amino acids derived from proteins that promote angiogenesis, neuromuscular stabilization, fibroblast activity, and endothelial and muscular repair [12,13,14,15]. It may also contain anti-inflammatory properties, promoting healing mechanisms [12]. BPC-157 has significant implications for both sports and pain medicine for the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries, particularly those that result from muscle fiber tears [13]. Additionally, the therapy has shown significant promise in healing injuries related to ligaments, tendons, and bones [16]. In animal models, treatment of wound sites with BPC-157 demonstrated improved results compared to the presence of only common factors necessary for wound healing, including EGF, FGF, and VEGF, with various biologically compatible carriers [17]. Still, numerous translational gaps remain, and the peptide will require further investigation to ensure proper and safe use in everyday clinical settings. Despite this, the public appeal of BPC-157, particularly within athletic circles, has placed pressure on clinicians to reckon with the rising popularity of poorly regulated, illicit use of this peptide therapy.

Preparation

While BPC-157 can be naturally extracted from gastric secretions, it is often chemically synthesized in lab settings for research applications. BPC-157 may be prepared using solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS). In SPPS, amino acids are added stepwise onto a resin carrier, with protecting groups such as Boc or Fmoc and the use of coupling reagents like DIC/HOBt and HATU to activate the carboxyl group [18]. The fully assembled peptide is subsequently cleaved from the resin for further purification and processing [19]. Purification techniques include high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to eliminate incomplete chains or other unintended products, allowing for approximately 99% purity of BPC-157 [20].
Once fully prepared and purified, the peptide may be lyophilized into a powder form for storage and shipment, thereby preventing degradation prior to use [20]. Though such methods are intended to allow for easier maintenance and access for research purposes, they also facilitate illicit access to BPC-157, circumventing the need for extensive equipment and invasive procedures for administration.

2. Mechanisms of Action in Pain Modulation and Healing

Wound healing occurs in multiple overlapping phases: coagulation and hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and wound remodeling [21]. During this process, a wide variety of proteins and signaling molecules enable and promote tissue repair and regeneration [22]. In the immediate aftermath of injury, blood vessels constrict, initiating the coagulation cascade to reduce blood loss. For hemostasis, platelets degranulate and release α-granules to secrete growth factors (GF) [22]. Macrophages, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells are further attracted to the wound site to begin the healing cascade, forming a clot composed of fibronectin, vitronectin, fibrin, thrombospondin, and von Willebrand factor [22].
The second stage of wound healing is further divided into two phases: (1) early inflammation, which lasts 1–2 days and begins with the complement system, and (2) late inflammation, which lasts for the following 1–2 days and involves the attraction of blood monocytes to the wound to become tissue macrophages [22]. These regulate cell repair by producing GFs for smooth muscle and endothelial cell proliferation and extracellular matrix (ECM) production, as well as by working as phagocytic cells [22].
The proliferation phase begins approximately three days following initial injury and lasts 2–4 weeks [22]. In this third phase, fibroblasts migrate to the wound site to generate hyaluronan, collagen, fibronectin, proteoglycans, and various matrix proteins to generate the new ECM [23]. Further, granulation tissue forms, when the basement membrane of the parent vessel is degraded, forming a capillary spout. Endothelial cells then migrate, proliferate, and mature into capillary tubes. Finally, epithelialization begins with the modulation by GFs [22]. Wound healing concludes with remodeling, including scar tissue maturation, which occurs over the course of multiple weeks. During this time, collagen is regularly formed and degraded by metalloproteinases at the site of the wound [22,24].
There are a multitude of steps and factors at play in wound healing, of which BPC-157 is only one. Studies have suggested that BPC-157 supports the wound healing process by boosting angiogenesis, stimulating collagen production, promoting cell migration and proliferation, and preventing excessive and chronic inflammation (uncontrolled inflammation post-injury may result in further tissue damage) [12,25,26]. This is due, in part, to BPC-157 action in modulating the nitric oxide (NO) system [27]. Further, BPC-157 activates pathways like the extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1 and ERK2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which are also crucial aspects of wound repair and regeneration, resulting in increasing use of the biologic in preclinical models for burns, other skin injuries, and various soft tissue damage (Table 1) [12,21]. Still, the data available for specific BPC-157 action in wound healing is limited. As such, note that some of these effects are still extrapolative rather than directly proven.
Table 1. Key cellular and molecular components of wound healing and BPC-157 action.
Table 1. Key cellular and molecular components of wound healing and BPC-157 action.
TypeRole in Wound HealingReported Effect of BPC-157
Cells
PlateletsFormation of thrombin [28]May protect platelet function in animal models [29]
LeukocytesPhagocytose bacteria, foreign particles [30]Possible immunomodulatory effect; normalize inflammation [31]
Growth factors
VEGFStimulate formation of blood vessels
Promote granulation tissue angiogenesis [32]
Upregulates VEGFR2 expression in endothelial cells for animal models [33]
Plasma proteins
AlbuminMaintain fluid balance
Transport growth factors [34]
Indirect effects via broad cyto- and hepato-protection [35] (indirect evidence, hypothesized)
Other
Inflammatory cytokine
modulation
Regulates inflammatory phase [26]Reduced inflammatory markers [36]
Nitric oxide (NO) systemVasodilation
Endothelial homeostasis
Inflammation modulation [27]
Modulates NO signaling
Improves endothelial function [27]
Collagen synthesis, ECM
remodeling
Matrix deposition
Scar maturation
Increased collagen deposition
Improved organization in burn, tendon healing [16,17,37]

3. Preclinical Models

Multiple animal model studies have investigated the healing properties of BPC-157 in vivo and in vitro (Table 2). This paper attempts to provide an overview of the existing preclinical literature landscape without editorial selection.
Preclinical studies suggest that BPC-157 promotes growth hormone receptor expression, may enhance pathways involved in angiogenesis and cell growth, and reduces inflammatory cytokines [25]. BPC-157 has also shown strong antioxidant properties, and such enzymes play regulatory roles in muscle regeneration [3].
Studies have indicated that BPC-157 supported wound healing in the esophagus, gastrointestinal tract, stomach, and duodenum in acute and chronic injury cases compared to controls in animal models [17,38]. In vivo and in vitro, BPC-157 promotes blood vessel density and improves ischemic muscle blood flow, therefore supporting the biologic’s positive impact on angiogenesis [33]. Of note, there was particular histological evidence of with increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and upregulation of growth hormone receptors [13]. Further, BPC-157 improved medial collateral ligament (MCL) healing in rats, including the expression of early growth response 1 (EGR1), a transcription factor implicated in cell growth, differentiation, and inflammation [37]. Given either intraperitoneally, as a local topical application, or orally, the therapy was shown to promote muscle and transected tendon healing [15,37].
Multiple studies have also reviewed the role of BPC-157 in skin wound and burn healing. In a rat model of an alkali skin burn injury, topical application accelerated wound closure and promoted granulation tissue formation, re-epithelialization, and dermal remodeling 2–3 weeks following injury (compared to typical burn healing, which can require several months) [39]. Similar results were noted by several other studies, with topical BPC-157 creams also decreasing inflammation and edema, improving collagen deposition, and angiogenesis [40]. Though most commonly and widely tested for skin or soft tissue injuries, BPC-157 has also shown potential in promoting healing in bone injury. In rabbits, BPC-157 was found to have osteogenic effects in healing segmental bone defects. Animals that received the therapy showed significantly improved healing after local delivery of bone marrow or autologous cortical graft compared to saline-treated controls [41]. Moreover, BPC-157 may also be considered for use across a variety of conditions, including congestive heart failure, colitis ischemia, catalepsy, ulcers, liver protection, and Parkinson’s disease [19,42,43,44,45].
In addition to direct or indirect intervention in various tissue, bone, and other disorders, BPC-157 may influence pain as well. In rats, available data suggest the local application of BPC-157 at surgical incision sites significantly raised the pain threshold at early time points hours following injury, but the reduced sensitivity effect was lessened by 7 days post-surgery [46]. Researchers posited that the antinociceptive effect of the biologic may occur through an anti-inflammatory mechanism that results in short-lived alleviation rather than a centrally mediated analgesic effect [46]. Further studies have indicated similar results in formalin pain models in rats, with BPC-157 decreasing flinching responses during acute phase 1 but not persistent phase 2 pain [47].
Table 2. Selected preclinical models of the wound healing and pain management actions of BPC-157.
Table 2. Selected preclinical models of the wound healing and pain management actions of BPC-157.
StudyModel and DesignKey Findings
Huang et al. [39]Rat, alkali skin burns
(n = 10 per group)
Topical application
Promoted wound closure, tissue formation 18 days post-wound
Mikus et al. [40]Mouse, thermal burns
(n = 10 per group)
Topical application
Improved collagen deposition and reduced edema
Cerovecki et al. [37]Rat, MCL damage
(n = 10 per group)
Intraperitoneal, oral, topical
Improved muscle repair, EGR1 expression
Hsieh et al. [33]Rat (in vivo, in vitro), ischemia
(n = 6 per group)
Intraperitoneal injection
Upregulated VEGFR2, promoted angiogenesis
Keremi et al. [36]Rat, periodontitis
(n = 7 per group)
Intravenous injection
Anti-inflammatory action
Šebečić et al. [41]Rabbit, segmental bone defect
(n = 12 per group)
Percutaneous, intramuscular
Improved local osteogenic effects
Park et al. [47]Rat, formalin-induced
(n = 7 per group)
Intraperitoneal injection
Reduced acute pain phase behavior, no chronic phase effect
Jung et al. [46]Rat, incisional pain
(n = 4–8 per group)
Intraperitoneal injection
Increased early pain threshold, effect diminished by 7 days
Animal studies have suggested that BPC-157 exhibits anti-inflammatory effects, with chronic dosing particularly potent against ligature-induced periodontitis in rats [36]. Notably, BPC-157 has been seen to counteract inflammatory and non-inflammatory pain in mice, and the biologic may interact with the opioid system through dopaminergic pathways to influence sensitivity to pain [48]. Therefore, BPC-157 has the potential to serve as an alternative for traditional pharmacotherapies, including steroid medications.
Though further studies are needed for full characterization, some initial reviews of the pharmacokinetic properties of BPC-157 reported linear characteristics with 14–19% bioavailability in rats and 45–51% in beagle dogs [20]. Based on a prototype BPC-157, the half-life of the biologic in animals appears to be less than 30 min [20]. Still, such data—on bioavailability and other results—across species are limited [3]. Few robust pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic studies exist, highlighting the need for further investigation to confirm the efficacy, indications, and safety profiles.
In the available preclinical data, no adverse effects were observed across multiple organ systems [25]. In animal models, BPC-157 was metabolized into small peptide fragments to enter normal amino acid metabolism and subsequent excretory pathways [20]. Preclinical toxicity studies in mice, rabbits, dogs, and rats indicated that both single- and multi-dose studies did not induce significant adverse effects, though some mild local irritation manifested [49]. Further, in rats, BPC-157 did not show any teratogenic effects based on comparisons of the number and condition of fetuses, uterine and placental weight of the pregnant rats, and assessment of various other fetal and maternal malformations [49]. Such findings support the biochemical supposition that BPC-157 may present a promising therapeutic avenue to avoid the potential pitfalls of existing biologics.
Across preclinical data, multiple methods of BPC-157 administration are used, and the reported efficacy appears to vary modestly. Topical applications in cutaneous injury and burn models consistently demonstrated accelerated wound closure and improved healing, suggesting that local administrations may be sufficient for superficial injury sites [39,40]. Intraperitoneal injections also showed positive effects for ischemia, incision site pain, and formalin-induced pain, heightening pain thresholds and promoting wound repair [33,46,47]. Oral administration and percutaneous injection were also studied in some applications [37,41]. These findings collectively indicate that BPC-157 has the potential to promote wound healing and analgesic effects through multiple modes of administration, though certain methods may be better suited for specific injury types depending on the need for local optimization or systemic use, for instance.
However, it is also necessary to note that the heterogeneity of models and experimental designs pose challenges to the generalizability of such findings. Further studies are needed to validate the results reviewed in this section.

4. Limited Human Data

Despite increasing off-label use in pain management, particularly in sports medicine, BPC-157 has not been well studied for use in humans, with only a small handful of studies featuring small sample sizes (Table 3) [12]. This section aims to provide an overview of the existing data, including a study that was ultimately not published. A retrospective study of 12 patients found that intraarticular injection of BPC-157 for chronic knee pain produced relief for more than 6 months for 11 participants, supporting preclinical findings that BPC-157 can promote musculoskeletal healing [25,50]. However, in addition to a small sample size, the retrospective chart review nature of this study resulted in varied patient follow-up. Four patients also received a combination of BPC-157 with TB4, a naturally occurring protein fragment that is important for tissue repair, regeneration, and wound healing. Via survey, three reported significant improvement, while one had no pain relief [50]. Researchers concluded that intra-articular injection of BPC-157 may help relieve multiple types of knee pain, though they recommend further investigation with the aid of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans [50].
Table 3. The limited studies of BPC-157 action in humans.
Table 3. The limited studies of BPC-157 action in humans.
StudyDesignFindings
Lee and Padgett [50]Retrospective chart review (n = 12) of chronic knee pain patientsKnee pain relief with variable dosage intra-articular injection
(combination therapy involved)
Lee et al. [51]Pilot study (n = 12) of interstitial cystitis patientsInterstitial cystitis symptom and pain relief with 10 mg intravesicular injection
No adverse effects
Lee and Burgess [52]IRB-approved study (n = 2), safety profile in healthy adultsNo adverse effects with ≤20 mg IV infusion, rapid clearance rate
A pilot study on the effects of BPC-157 in patients with interstitial cystitis revealed potential for the use in bladder pain, with 10 of 12 patients reporting total symptom relief after one 10 mg intravesical injection [51]. The remaining 2 patients rated their symptom resolution at 80%. Data was collected by administering the Global Response Assessment questionnaire [51]. Further, researchers reported seeing no adverse effects [51]. Still, as with other human clinical data, this study remains limited by a small sample size; so, it is necessary to regard results with some caution.
While very limited human data exist for BPC-157 in humans, some attention has been dedicated towards its safety and pharmacokinetic profile. A small (n = 2) study was performed to assess intravenous BPC-157 safety in humans at up to 20 mg [52]. Researchers found no measurable impacts on the patients’ heart, kidneys, thyroid, liver, or blood glucose via obtaining blood work and vital signs, and neither patient reported adverse side effects when asked at each appointment [52]. Plasma BPC-157 concentrations returned to baseline levels within 24 h, supporting existing pharmacokinetic understanding of the biologic’s quick bodily clearance [52]. This pilot study is the only characterization of half-life in humans, therefore indicating a shortage of robust peer-reviewed data in this area [12].
As with preclinical studies, the limited BPC-157 studies in humans also investigated various methods of biologic administration, each of which indicated some potential positive effects. These findings similarly suggest that each method of application may be preferable for particular injury types.
Despite the encouraging data, further studies are necessary to fully assess the safety and efficacy of BPC-157 therapy in humans. Notably, much of the data suffer from small sample sizes, lack of appropriate and broad-ranging controls, and insufficient randomization. Additionally, in 2015, a phase I clinical trial was conducted on 42 patients to study pharmacokinetics and safety. Unfortunately, the results submission and publication were not published for unknown reasons [3,53]. Therefore, additional research should strive towards incorporating a larger patient population, as well as the inclusion of validated pain scales and long-term safety monitoring. An expanded base of research that addresses the aforementioned limitations will provide a stronger understanding of the biologic’s potential benefits and risks within humans.

5. Safety, Regulatory, and Ethical Considerations

It is notable that a considerable portion of the current evidence related to BPC-157 arises from a single research group. This highlights the continued and pressing need for further research in order to generate a diverse and deep base of understanding for application. Further, independent validation of existing studies is necessary.
Moreover, the lack of human randomized controlled trials investigating BPC-157 has resulted in researchers urging caution for its use in clinical settings, particularly as a sports enhancement or lifestyle maintenance measure [13,54]. Stable in water and gastric fluid, the peptide has the potential to reduce the required administration frequency due to enhanced biostability and bioavailability [55]. Nonetheless, concerns remained with regard to stability in vitro, limited application sites, and the necessity of biocompatible carriers [56].
Very limited safety information is available for BPC-157 therapy in humans, and despite the positive results of animal models and a few human studies, anecdotal evidence from the use of BPC-157 has raised concerns. Anonymous online user narratives reported injection site swelling and pain, anxiety, heart palpitations, weakness, depression, loss of appetite, fatigue, insomnia, joint pain, drowsiness, and anhedonia [25]. It is important to recognize that these data are unconfirmed and ought to be treated cautiously, placed low in the evidence hierarchy. Nonetheless, it is worth considering how these complaints may manifest due to the unregulated production and variable dosing of BPC-157, amongst other causes [25]. Furthermore, BPC-157 may cause pain and/or necrosis upon injection into the subject alongside normal saline or other aqueous solutions [3]. As such, there remains a need for further characterization of the proper preparation and administration of BPC-157 as a pain management and/or sports medicine therapeutic.
While all peptide therapies can be applied via injection to the injury site, BPC-157 has also shown preclinical effectiveness through topical or oral applications. Further, unlike therapies such as PRP and BMAC that must be autologous in nature to be effective, thereby making it cost- and labor-intensive, BPC-157 that can be manufactured, distributed, and applied ubiquitously [2]. As such, most peptides and other orthobiologics can only be accessed in clinical settings under supervision, unlike BPC-157, which can be obtained through gray channels such as unregulated or semi-regulated distribution pathways [25].
Though BPC-157 has been swept into the growing enthusiasm around peptide therapies—in and outside of formal clinical settings—significant safety, ethical, and legal concerns around its uses remain. Despite biologic progress and potential for wound healing, this has largely not translated to official policy and regulation settings. As of the most recent 2025 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) list of prohibited substances, BPC-157 remains a prohibited substance [57]. Despite being banned from use in professional sports, BPC-157 is gaining attention from athletes and those in sports medicine [25]. Moreover, it does not have U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval [25]. BPC-157 has also become quite popular in mainstream Hollywood and other internet influencer circles, with online “wellness clinics” and celebrities promoting such unapproved peptide drugs as wellness, fitness, and youth hacks [58,59,60,61]. This has only raised further clinician and policymaker concerns surrounding the safety of biologics like BPC-157 circulating on the market [58,59].

6. Conclusions

BPC-157 has significant potential as a biological therapy for a variety of tissue injuries, bone defects, and other conditions. In particular, BPC-157 promotes wound healing through interactions with cells, peptides, and signaling molecules during the tissue regeneration process. Studies have also indicated that it has action to mitigate inflammation and inflammatory pain. Moreover, due to its reparative effects, BPC-157 offers a possible alternative for pain relief [50].
However, significant concerns remain, most notably due to the lack of human data related to BPC-157 efficacy and safety. While animal models have suggested that BPC-157 is effective in a variety of pain management and wound healing applications without adverse effects, anecdotal evidence of unregulated uses of the biologic raises concerns about how well these findings may extend to human applications. As such, further research is necessary to fully characterize the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of BPC-157 as a viable therapeutic intervention. Randomized controlled trials are needed for establishing human efficacy and toxicology.
Further, priority should be placed on well-defined, high-prevalence indications based on existing preclinical data—in particular, to independently verify findings, provide standardization in dosing and formulation, and further assess safety. Trial designs ought to be strongly considered as well, with a focus on including validated pain scales, rather than solely relying on patient narratives, as well as measuring functional outcomes.
Moreover, standardization and regulation of BPC-157 preparation is necessary to prevent contamination and adverse effects, particularly in settings where access to controlled clinical sites is limited. Currently, there are no standardized guidelines around dosing and protocols, particularly for potential use in humans, marking an important hurdle to be cleared before BPC-157 can move toward official sanctioned use in the clinical and public spheres [20]. As mainstream attention continues to linger on peptide therapies for athletic recovery, youth maintenance, lifestyle care, and more, the need for exhaustive study and careful regulation grows increasingly pressing. Despite the lack of standardization and further studies, BPC-157 and other peptides, once researched more extensively, may offer patients suffering from injuries another avenue that aids in joint preservation, tissue regeneration, and improved pain relief.

Author Contributions

C.Y. and C.L.R. devised, wrote, and revised the manuscript. A.D., V.S.-O., J.J.H., W.L., K.D., K.A., H.W.B. and P.J.C. provided expert review, edited, and revised the manuscript. C.L.R. is the senior author. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest regarding BPC-157.

Abbreviations

BMACBone marrow aspirate concentrate
BPC-157Body Protective Compound-157
Boctert-butoxycarbonyl
DICDiisopropylcarbodiimide
ECMExtracellular matrix
EGFEpidermal growth factor
EGR1Early growth response 1
ERK1/2Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2
FGFFibroblast growth factor
Fmoc9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl
GFGrowth factors
HATUHexafluorophosphate Azabenzotriazole Tetramethyl Uronium
HOBt1-Hydroxybenzotriazole
HPLChigh-performance liquid chromatography
MCLmedial collateral ligament
MRIMagnetic resonance imaging
NONitric oxide
PRPPlatelet-rich plasma
SPPSsolid-phase peptide synthesis
TB4Thymosin Beta-4
VEGFVascular endothelial growth factor
VEGFR2Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2
WADAWorld Anti-Doping Agency

References

  1. Gu, X.; Carroll Turpin, M.A.; Romero-Ortega, M.I. Biomaterials and Regenerative Medicine in Pain Management. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2022, 26, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yuan, C.; Ang, S.P.; Hasoon, J.J.; Tolba, R.; Ruan, Q.Z.; Lam, C.M.; Lo Bianco, G.; Christo, P.J.; Robinson, C.L. Dual-Action Regenerative Therapies: Regeneration and Antimicrobial Effects of Platelet- and Marrow-Derived Biologics. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Józwiak, M.; Bauer, M.; Kamysz, W.; Kleczkowska, P. Multifunctionality and Possible Medical Application of the BPC 157 Peptide—Literature and Patent Review. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, L.; Wang, N.; Zhang, W.; Cheng, X.; Yan, Z.; Shao, G.; Wang, X.; Wang, R.; Fu, C. Therapeutic Peptides: Current Applications and Future Directions. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Prashanth Balusani, J.; Shrivastava, S.; Pundkar, A.; Kale, P. Navigating the Therapeutic Landscape: A Comprehensive Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Knee Osteoarthritis. Cureus 2024, 16, e54747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ishiguro, H.; Kaito, T.; Yarimitsu, S.; Hashimoto, K.; Okada, R.; Kushioka, J.; Chijimatsu, R.; Takenaka, S.; Makino, T.; Sakai, Y.; et al. Intervertebral Disc Regeneration with an Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Tissue-Engineered Construct in a Rat Nucleotomy Model. Acta Biomater. 2019, 87, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cushman, C.J.; Ibrahim, A.F.; Smith, A.D.; Hernandez, E.J.; Mackay, B.; Zumwalt, M. Local and Systemic Peptide Therapies for Soft Tissue Regeneration: A Narrative Review. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2024, 97, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Goulian, A.J.; Goldstein, B.; Saad, M.A. Advancements in Regenerative Therapies for Orthopedics: A Comprehensive Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Peptide Therapies, and Biomimetic Applications. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Estrada, E.; Décima, J.L.; Rodríguez, M.; Di Tomaso, M.; Roberti, J. Patient-Reported Outcomes After Platelet-Rich Plasma, Bone Marrow Aspirate, and Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injections for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis. Clin. Med. Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet. Disord. 2020, 13, 1179544120931086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lee, H.S.; Kim, E.K.; Kim, S.J. Effects of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate and Platelet-Rich Plasma on Patients with Rotator Cuff Tendon Tear: A Prospective, Non-Randomized, Comparative, Single-Blind Study. Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2018, 61, e79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pabinger, C.; Lothaller, H.; Kobinia, G.S. Intra-Articular Injection of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (Mesenchymal Stem Cells) in KL Grade III and IV Knee Osteoarthritis: 4 Year Results of 37 Knees. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. McGuire, F.P.; Martinez, R.; Lenz, A.; Skinner, L.; Cushman, D.M. Regeneration or Risk? A Narrative Review of BPC-157 for Musculoskeletal Healing. Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med. 2025, 18, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gwyer, D.; Wragg, N.M.; Wilson, S.L. Gastric Pentadecapeptide Body Protection Compound BPC 157 and Its Role in Accelerating Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Healing. Cell Tissue Res. 2019, 377, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sikirić, P.; Petek, M.; Ručman, R.; Seiwerth, S.; Grabarević, Z.; Rotkvić, I.; Turković, B.; Jagić, V.; Mildner, B.; Duvnjak, M.; et al. A New Gastric Juice Peptide, BPC. An Overview of the Stomach-Stress-Organoprotection Hypothesis and Beneficial Effects of BPC. J. Physiol. 1993, 87, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Brcic, L.; Brcic, I.; Staresinic, M.; Novinscak, T.; Sikiric, P.; Seiwerth, S. Modulatory Effect of Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 on Angiogenesis in Muscle and Tendon Healing. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2009, 60, 191–196. [Google Scholar]
  16. Staresinic, M.; Sebecic, B.; Patrlj, L.; Jadrijevic, S.; Suknaic, S.; Perovic, D.; Aralica, G.; Zarkovic, N.; Borovic, S.; Srdjak, M.; et al. Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 Accelerates Healing of Transected Rat Achilles Tendon and in Vitro Stimulates Tendocytes Growth. J. Orthop. Res. 2003, 21, 976–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Seiwerth, S.; Rucman, R.; Turkovic, B.; Sever, M.; Klicek, R.; Radic, B.; Drmic, D.; Stupnisek, M.; Misic, M.; Vuletic, L.B.; et al. BPC 157 and Standard Angiogenic Growth Factors. Gastrointestinal Tract Healing, Lessons from Tendon, Ligament, Muscle and Bone Healing. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 1972–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pflaum, Z.; Ručman, R. Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis of the Fragment BPC 157 of Human Gastric Juice Protein BPC and Its Analogues. Acta Chim. Slov. 2005, 52, 34–39. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jelovac, N.; Sikiric, P.; Rucman, R.; Petek, M.; Marovic, A.; Perovic, D.; Seiwerth, S.; Mise, S.; Turkovic, B.; Dodig, G.; et al. Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 Attenuates Disturbances Induced by Neuroleptics: The Effect on Catalepsy and Gastric Ulcers in Mice and Rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1999, 379, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. He, L.; Feng, D.; Guo, H.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, W.; Wang, S.; Wang, Z.; Hao, Q.; et al. Pharmacokinetics, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion of Body-Protective Compound 157, a Potential Drug for Treating Various Wounds, in Rats and Dogs. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 1026182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gurtner, G.C.; Werner, S.; Barrandon, Y.; Longaker, M.T. Wound Repair and Regeneration. Nature 2008, 453, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Enoch, S.; Leaper, D.J. Basic Science of Wound Healing. Surgery 2008, 26, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cialdai, F.; Risaliti, C.; Monici, M. Role of Fibroblasts in Wound Healing and Tissue Remodeling on Earth and in Space. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 958381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xue, M.; Jackson, C.J. Extracellular Matrix Reorganization During Wound Healing and Its Impact on Abnormal Scarring. Adv. Wound Care 2015, 4, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vasireddi, N.; Hahamyan, H.; Salata, M.J.; Karns, M.; Calcei, J.G.; Voos, J.E.; Apostolakos, J.M. Emerging Use of BPC-157 in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine: A Systematic Review. HSS J. 2025, 21, 15563316251355552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Seiwerth, S.; Milavic, M.; Vukojevic, J.; Gojkovic, S.; Krezic, I.; Vuletic, L.B.; Pavlov, K.H.; Petrovic, A.; Sikiric, S.; Vranes, H.; et al. Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 and Wound Healing. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 627533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Seiwerth, S.; Brcic, L.; Vuletic, L.; Kolenc, D.; Aralica, G.; Misic, M.; Zenko, A.; Drmic, D.; Rucman, R.; Sikiric, P. BPC 157 and Blood Vessels. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014, 20, 1121–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Monroe, D.M.; Hoffman, M.; Roberts, H.R. Platelets and Thrombin Generation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2002, 22, 1381–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Konosic, S.; Petricevic, M.; Ivancan, V.; Konosic, L.; Goluza, E.; Krtalic, B.; Drmic, D.; Stupnisek, M.; Seiwerth, S.; Sikiric, P. Intragastric Application of Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Cilostazol, and BPC 157 in Rats: Platelet Aggregation and Blood Clot. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 9084643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Barrick, B.; Campbell, E.J.; Owen, C.A. Leukocyte Proteinases in Wound Healing: Roles in Physiologic and Pathologic Processes. Wound Repair Regen. 1999, 7, 410–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kalogjera, L.; Ries, M.; Baudoin, T.; Ferencic, Z.; Trotic, R.; Pegan, B. Dose-Dependent Protective Effect of BPC 157 on Capsaicin-Induced Rhinitis in Rats. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 1997, 254, S9–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Johnson, K.E.; Wilgus, T.A. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Angiogenesis in the Regulation of Cutaneous Wound Repair. Adv. Wound Care 2014, 3, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hsieh, M.J.; Liu, H.T.; Wang, C.N.; Huang, H.Y.; Lin, Y.; Ko, Y.S.; Wang, J.S.; Chang, V.H.S.; Pang, J.H.S. Therapeutic Potential of Pro-Angiogenic BPC157 Is Associated with VEGFR2 Activation and up-Regulation. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 95, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hankins, J. The Role of Albumin in Fluid and Electrolyte Balance. J. Infus. Nurs. 2006, 29, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sever, A.Z.; Sever, M.; Vidovic, T.; Lojo, N.; Kolenc, D.; Vuletic, L.B.; Drmic, D.; Kokot, A.; Zoricic, I.; Coric, M.; et al. Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 in the Therapy of the Rats with Bile Duct Ligation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 847, 130–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Keremi, B.; Lohinai, Z.; Komora, P.; Duhaj, S.; Borsi, K.; Jobbagy-Ovari, G.; Kallo, K.; Szekely, A.D.; Fazekas, A.; Dobo-Nagy, C.; et al. Antiinflammatory Effect of BPC 157 on Experimental Periodontitis in Rats. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2009, 60, 115–122. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cerovecki, T.; Bojanic, I.; Brcic, L.; Radic, B.; Vukoja, I.; Seiwerth, S.; Sikiric, P. Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 (PL 14736) Improves Ligament Healing in the Rat. J. Orthop. Res. 2010, 28, 1155–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Seiwerth, S.; Sikiric, P.; Grabarevic, Z.; Zoricic, I.; Hanzevacki, M.; Ljubanovic, D.; Coric, V.; Konjevoda, P.; Petek, M.; Rucman, R.; et al. BPC 157’s Effect on Healing. J. Physiol. 1997, 91, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Huang, T.; Zhang, K.; Sun, L.; Xue, X.; Zhang, C.; Shu, Z.; Mu, N.; Gu, J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; et al. Body Protective Compound-157 Enhances Alkali-Burn Wound Healing in Vivo and Promotes Proliferation, Migration, and Angiogenesis in Vitro. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2015, 9, 2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mikus, D.; Sikiric, P.; Seiwerth, S.; Petricevic, A.; Aralica, G.; Druzijancic, N.; Rucman, R.; Petek, M.; Pigac, B.; Perovic, D.; et al. Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 Cream Improves Burn-Wound Healing and Attenuates Burn-Gastric Lesions in Mice. Burns 2001, 27, 817–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Šebečić, B.; Nikolić, V.; Sikirić, P.; Seiwerth, S.; Šoša, T.; Patrlj, L.; Grabarević, Ž.; Ručman, R.; Petek, M.; Konjevoda, P.; et al. Osteogenic Effect of a Gastric Pentadecapeptide, BPC-157, on the Healing of Segmental Bone Defect in Rabbits: A Comparison with Bone Marrow and Autologous Cortical Bone Implantation. Bone 1999, 24, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sikiric, P.; Marovic, A.; Matoz, W.; Anic, T.; Buljat, G.; Mikus, D.; Stancic-Rokotov, D.; Šeparovic, J.; Seiwerth, S.; Grabarevic, Z.; et al. A Behavioural Study of the Effect of Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 in Parkinson’s Disease Models in Mice and Gastric Lesions Induced by 1-Methyl-4- Phenyl-1,2,3,6-Tetrahydropyridine. J. Physiol. 1999, 93, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Duzel, A.; Vlainic, J.; Antunovic, M.; Malekinusic, D.; Vrdoljak, B.; Samara, M.; Gojkovic, S.; Krezic, I.; Vidovic, T.; Bilic, Z.; et al. Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 in the Treatment of Colitis and Ischemia and Reperfusion in Rats: New Insights. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 8465–8488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lovric-Bencic, M.; Sikiric, P.; Hanzevacki, J.S.; Seiwerth, S.; Rogic, D.; Kusec, V.; Aralica, G.; Konjevoda, P.; Batelja, L.; Blagaic, A.B. Doxorubicine-Congestive Heart Failure-Increased Big Endothelin-1 Plasma Concentration: Reversal by Amlodipine, Losartan, and Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC157 in Rat and Mouse. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2004, 95, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sikiric, P.; Seiwerth, S.; Grabarevic, Z.; Rucman, R.; Petek, M.; Rotkvic, I.; Turkovic, B.; Jagic, V.; Mildner, B.; Duvnjak, M.; et al. Hepatoprotective Effect of BPC 157, A 15-Aminoacid Peptide, on Liver Lesions Induced by Either Restraint Stress or Bile Duct and Hepatic Artery Ligation or CCl4 Administration. A Comparative Study with Dopamine Agonists and Somatostatin. Life Sci. 1993, 53, PL291–PL296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jung, Y.-H.; Kim, H.; Kim, H.; Kim, E.; Baik, J.; Kang, H. The Anti-Nociceptive Effect of BPC-157 on the Incisional Pain Model in Rats. J. Dent. Anesth. Pain Med. 2022, 22, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Park, S.Y.; Choi, S.R.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, S.C.; Jeong, S.Y.; Jeong, J.H.; Lee, T.Y. Antinociceptive Effect of BPC-157 in the Formalin-Induced Pain Model. Kosin Med. J. 2021, 36, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vukojevic, J.; Milavić, M.; Perović, D.; Ilić, S.; Čilić, A.; Đuran, N.; Štrbe, S.; Zoričić, Z.; Filipčić, I.; Brečić, P.; et al. Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 and the Central Nervous System. Neural Regen. Res. 2021, 17, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, C.; Sun, L.; Ren, F.L.; Huang, P.; Tian, Z.; Cui, J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, S.; Zhang, K.; He, L.; et al. Preclinical Safety Evaluation of Body Protective Compound-157, a Potential Drug for Treating Various Wounds. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2020, 114, 104665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, E.; Padgett, B. Intra-Articular Injection of BPC 157 for Multiple Types of Knee Pain. Altern. Ther. Health Med. 2021, 27, 8–13. [Google Scholar]
  51. Lee, E.; Walker, C.; Ayadi, B. Effect of BPC-157 on Symptoms in Patients with Interstitial Cystitis: A Pilot Study. Altern. Ther. Health Med. 2024, 30, 12–17. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lee, E.; Burgess, K. Safety of Intravenous Infusion of BPC157 in Humans: A Pilot Study. Altern. Ther. Health Med. 2025, 31, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Study Details|NCT02637284|PCO-02—Safety and Pharmacokinetics Trial|ClinicalTrials.Gov. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02637284 (accessed on 26 February 2026).
  54. DeFoor, M.T.; Dekker, T.J. Injectable Therapeutic Peptides—An Adjunct to Regenerative Medicine and Sports Performance? Arthrosc.-J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 2025, 41, 150–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Staresinic, M.; Japjec, M.; Vranes, H.; Prtoric, A.; Zizek, H.; Krezic, I.; Gojkovic, S.; Smoday, I.M.; Oroz, K.; Staresinic, E.; et al. Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 and Striated, Smooth, and Heart Muscle. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Park, J.W.; Hwang, S.R.; Yoon, I.S. Advanced Growth Factor Delivery Systems in Wound Management and Skin Regeneration. Molecules 2017, 22, 1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. The Prohibited List|World Anti Doping Agency. Available online: https://www.wada-ama.org/en/prohibited-list#search-anchor (accessed on 11 December 2025).
  58. Is It Safe to Take Peptides, and Why Is the Wellness Trend Raising Concerns?—The Washington Post. Available online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2025/11/26/peptides-bodybuilding-injections-side-effects/ (accessed on 11 December 2025).
  59. The Online Wellness Clinics Letting Customers ‘Add to Cart’ Experimental Peptides without a Doctor Consult|Health|The Guardian. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/dec/11/the-online-wellness-clinics-letting-customers-add-to-cart-experimental-peptides-without-a-doctor-consult (accessed on 11 December 2025).
  60. Peptide Injections: What to Know about the Unapproved Trend and Its Risks|AP News. Available online: https://apnews.com/article/peptide-injections-risks-side-effects-6f0d391b270f5008932cba909b8fef07 (accessed on 11 December 2025).
  61. Jülke, E.M.; Beck-Sickinger, A.G. Peptide Therapeutics: Current Status and Future Opportunity with Focus on Nose-to-Brain Delivery☆. Peptides 2025, 188, 171404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuan, C.; Demers, A.; Silva-Ortiz, V.; Hasoon, J.J.; Lee, W.; Dave, K.; Amirdelfan, K.; Burke, H.W.; Christo, P.J.; Robinson, C.L. From Regeneration to Analgesia: The Role of BPC-157 in Tissue Repair and Pain Management. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 2876. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062876

AMA Style

Yuan C, Demers A, Silva-Ortiz V, Hasoon JJ, Lee W, Dave K, Amirdelfan K, Burke HW, Christo PJ, Robinson CL. From Regeneration to Analgesia: The Role of BPC-157 in Tissue Repair and Pain Management. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(6):2876. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062876

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuan, Claire, Ariana Demers, Victor Silva-Ortiz, Jamal J. Hasoon, Woojin Lee, Karan Dave, Kasra Amirdelfan, Harold W. Burke, Paul J. Christo, and Christopher L. Robinson. 2026. "From Regeneration to Analgesia: The Role of BPC-157 in Tissue Repair and Pain Management" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 6: 2876. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062876

APA Style

Yuan, C., Demers, A., Silva-Ortiz, V., Hasoon, J. J., Lee, W., Dave, K., Amirdelfan, K., Burke, H. W., Christo, P. J., & Robinson, C. L. (2026). From Regeneration to Analgesia: The Role of BPC-157 in Tissue Repair and Pain Management. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(6), 2876. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062876

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop