Next Article in Journal
Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Dietary Polyphenols through Inhibitory Activity against Metalloproteinases
Previous Article in Journal
Insights into the Effect of Chitosan and β-Cyclodextrin Hybridization of Zeolite-A on Its Physicochemical and Cytotoxic Properties as a Bio-Carrier for 5-Fluorouracil: Equilibrium and Release Kinetics Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 14
10.3390/molecules28145428
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biomedical Applications of Zirconia-Based Nanomaterials: Challenges and Future Perspectives

by
Azzah M. Bannunah
Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
Molecules 2023, 28(14), 5428; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145428
Submission received: 13 June 2023 / Revised: 9 July 2023 / Accepted: 10 July 2023 / Published: 15 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Nanochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
ZrO2 nanoparticles have received substantially increased attention in every field of life owing to their wide range of applications. Zirconium oxide is a commercially economical, non-hazardous, and sustainable metal oxide having diversified potential applications. ZrO2 NPs play a vast role in the domain of medicine and pharmacy such as anticancer, antibacterial, and antioxidant agents and tissue engineering owing to their reliable curative biomedical applications. In this review article, we address all of the medical and biomedical applications of ZrO2 NPs prepared through various approaches in a critical way. ZrO2 is a bio-ceramic substance that has received increased attention in biomimetic scaffolds owing to its high mechanical strength, excellent biocompatibility, and high chemical stability. ZrO2 NPs have demonstrated potential anticancer activity against various cancer cells. ZrO2-based nanomaterials have exhibited potential antibacterial activity against various bacterial strains and have also demonstrated excellent antioxidant activity. The ZrO2 nanocomposite also exhibits highly sensitive biosensing activity toward the sensing of glucose and other biological species.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Zirconium is a transition metal with enhanced thermal, mechanical, catalytic, and thermal characteristics and also demonstrates significant corrosion resistance [1]. Zirconium has an atomic number of 40 and has a distinctive physical and chemical properties like titanium [2]. Zirconium exists naturally in five different isotopic forms; out of which 90Zr exists abundantly in nature (51.45%) [3]. Zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) is also called zirconia and has a monoclinic crystal structure at room temperature [4]. ZrO2 is an n-type semiconductor and has many fascinating properties such as a high dielectric constant, ion-exchange ability, a high refractive index, high optical transparency, low thermal conductivity, a low coefficient of thermal expansion, polymorphic nature, and exceptional chemical and optical properties [5,6]. ZrO2 is a material of great technological interest, having good natural color, transformation toughness, good chemical stability, and high strength and being an excellent corrosion-, chemical-, and microbial-resistant material [7]. ZrO2 is a polymorphic crystal found in three crystallographic forms: monoclinic, cubic, and tetragonal [8]. At room temperature, the monoclinic phase is stable and transforms into the tetragonal phase at 1170 °C, while this phase transforms to the cubic form at 2370 °C [9], which is unstable at ambient temperature in bulk forms [10]. Monoclinic ZrO2 has a coordination number of seven, while the cubic and tetragonal ZrO2 have a coordination number of eight. A coordination number of seven is favorable owing to its strong Zr-O covalent bond, and, thus, monoclinic ZrO2 at lower temperatures is realized to be thermodynamically stable [11]. Considerable efforts have been reported for stabilizing the unstable tetragonal and cubic crystal phases by doping [12]. ZrO2 is doped with other metal oxides, such as MgO, Y2O3, CaO, and Ce2O3, to form stabilized cubic or tetragonal phases [13]. Adding other metal oxides in low amounts as a dopant, the conversion to the monoclinic lattice does not occur during cooling; rather, the tetragonal form is stabilized to a greater degree at room temperature [14]. Doping also controls the morphology and phase of the ZrO2 nanocrystals [15]. Among the three phases, the tetragonal phase is considered to be more active due to its stability and the presence of defects [16]. The conversion between the monoclinic phase and tetragonal phase is reversible, which depends on the temperature given. Each form has different mechanical properties. The three different polymorphs of ZrO2 as well as their corresponding mechanical property are shown in Figure 1 [17].
Zirconium oxide is a commercially economical, non-hazardous, and sustainable metal oxide having diversified potential applications [18]. ZrO2 is considered an important candidate material for advanced ceramics because of its good chemical stability, high strength, and excellent high-temperature performance [19]. ZrO2 holds both reducing and oxidizing properties owing to its basic as well acidic nature and wide bandgap (5.0–5.5 eV) [20,21]. ZrO2 has several advantages over other ceramic materials due to the transformation-toughening mechanism, which provides excellent mechanical properties, such as fracture toughness and fracture strength [22]. Due to these advantages, zirconia-based materials are potentially applied in various advanced fields for photocatalysts [23,24], adsorption [25,26], anti-corrosion coating [27], supercapacitor [28], Li-ion batteries [29], sensors [30,31], water splitting [32], solar cells [33], etc. Research studies on ZrO2-based nanoparticles are increasing day by day. Figure 2 presents the number of articles published on ZrO2-based NPs, which has been increasing continuously in 2010–2023. Such an increase in interest in ZrO2-based materials is due to their outstanding properties such as hardness, optical transparency, high refractive index, and chemical and photoelectron stability [34]. ZrO2 ceramic is an advanced biomaterial widely used in medical engineering industries owing to its superior biocompatibility and mechanical strength over other conventional ceramic materials [35].

2. Biomedical Applications of ZrO2 NPs

ZrO2 NPs have been utilized in various applications as antimicrobial agents, nanopowder filling, sintering raw material, nanocoating, and anticancer and antioxidant agents. The functionalization of ZrO2 NPs as hybrid substances has received increased attention in microscale valves, tissue-engineering scaffolds, microfluidic devices, bone prostheses, and drug delivery devices, as well as other medical devices, owing to their bionics and biocompatible and mechanical properties [36]. Bio-medically, ZrO2-based materials are efficiently used in meat packaging [37], dentistry [38], artificial scaffolds [39], etc. At the tissue level, ZrO2 was observed to be biocompatible like titanium. Cultured osteoblasts proliferate and differentiate on zirconia without causing any adverse effects. ZrO2 is a bioinert ceramic material because, after implantation, it shows only a morphological fixation with its surrounding tissues without creating any biological/chemical bonding [40].
ZrO2 is generally synthesized via different chemical approaches such as sol-gel, coprecipitation, solvothermal, hydrothermal, etc. These synthesizing approaches for ZrO2 preparation use toxic chemicals and energy-intensive and costly equipment processes for achieving crystallinity [41]. The green synthesis of ZrO2 NPs excludes the usage of hazardous chemicals, which might generate toxic intermediates in conventional synthesis methods. Plant-mediated nanofabrication is a cost-effective and easy-to-handle approach that does not need any exceptional reaction conditions [18,42]. The biogenic synthesis approach uses affordable and locally available plants and other biocompatible sources, e.g., fungi, algae, and bacteria for the synthesis of ZrO2. The extracted biomolecules from these biological sources act as potent bioreducing, biocapping, and biostabilizing agents and produce ZrO2 in sufficient quantity. This green method for ZrO2 NP synthesis also matches well with the principle of green and sustainable chemistry [43]. In green synthesis, ZrO2 NPs are produced through a reduction process. A mechanism proposed in a study revealed that phytochemical compounds of the -OH moiety present in the plant may carry out the process of reduction. The enol compounds convert into keto form, which releases hydrogen atoms and reduces the ion of the zirconium salt, and form ZrO2 NPs after annealing [44]. Plant extracts are very promising owing to their complex chemical composition and their easier extraction. Phytochemicals in plant extract act as reducing, precipitating, and capping agents and thus demonstrate a significant role in controlling the particle shape, size, and phase stability, as well as other characteristics, of NPs [45].

2.1. Antioxidant Activity

Antioxidants are several compounds that protect the body from the noxious effect of free radicals, and their protective mechanism is evaluated through scavenging free radicals [46,47]. The antioxidant activity of the ZnO-ZrO2 heterojunction was determined by scavenging the 2,20-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) free radicals, which show higher activity than the ascorbic acid. The smaller IC50 values of the ZnO-ZrO2 heterojunction (149.20 µg mL−1) confirm its high antioxidant potential against ABTS free radicals as compared with the standard ascorbic acid (171.04 µg mL−1) [48]. Bioinspired ZrO2 NPs utilizing an aqueous extract of agriculture waste durva grass exhibited excellent antioxidant activity through a DPPH scavenging assay. The ZrO2 NPs demonstrate higher activity than aqueous durva grass extract and lower activity than standard ascorbic acid. ZrO2 NPs are e− donors and can convert the free radicals into products that are more stable via a terminating radical chain reaction and also increased radical scavenging inhibition. ZrO2 NPs displayed 91.2% scavenging inhibition (IC50 = 130.38 μg/mL) and the aqueous extract showed 54.8% inhibition (IC50 = 228.61 μg/mL), while the ascorbic acid demonstrated 95% inhibition (IC50 = 105.78 μg/mL, a little higher than ZrO2 NPs) [49]. The antioxidant activity of ZrO2 is size-dependent, and it was reported that nano-ZrO2 (particle size distribution is 39 nm in water) scavenges about 71.4% of the free radicals using 1 mg and 76.9% at 100 mg, whereas micro-ZrO2 scavenges about 57.4% and 69.4% of free radicals at 1 mg and 100 mg, respectively [50]. Similarly optimized Fe3O4-stabilized ZrO2 NPs exhibited ~76% scavenging inhibition capability. The reason for such high antioxidant activity is the efficient transferring of the O atom electron density of ZrO2 towards the odd electrons, which are positioned at the N atom of the DPPH, while Fe3O4 helps in the effective electron transfer [51]. ZrO2 NPs prepared using an aqueous extract of Moringa oleifera leaves revealed 69% radical scavenging efficiency determined via DPPH assay [52]. Similarly, C-ZrO2, S-ZrO2, and C-S-ZrO2 nanocomposites synthesized using the aqueous leaf extract of Plumeria acuminate show an antioxidant activity with an IC50 value ranging from 177.60 to 359.46 µg/mL as compared to the activity of Gallic acid (standard), which shows an IC50 of 19.99 µg/mL. The observed antioxidant activity may be credited to the OH groups present in the NPs, which are similar to the phenolic functional group [53]. The collagen protein and calcium carbonate stabilized ZrO2 NPs show the 96% of radical scavenging activity [54]. Some of the antioxidant activity of ZrO2 and their composite-based materials are summarized in Table 1.

2.2. Antidiabetic Activity

ZrO2 NCs for biomedical applications are prepared generally for increasing the ZrO2 native properties and also to introduce additional functionalities such as anticancer, antidiabetic, and antimicrobial properties. ZrO2/CuO-ZnO NC was greenly synthesized using Rhizome extracts of Corallocarpus epigaeus. The ZrO2/CuO-ZnO NC displayed about 75% α-amylase inhibition activity, while ZrO2 NPs only showed 57% activity [60]. Gd2O3- and Nd2O3-decorated ZrO2 NPs prepared using a green hydrothermal method exhibited 76% α-amylase inhibiting potential, which suggests their superior antidiabetic activity [61].

2.3. Antimicrobial Activity

The antimicrobial activity of ZrO2 NPs, prepared via the sol-gel method, on E. coli and S. aureus bacterial strains were evaluated, and their results showed that the ZrO2 NPs displayed 25 mm and 27 mm inhibition zones against the E. coli and S. aureus, respectively. The reason for this activity is the increased formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that leads to the destruction of bacterial cells [62]. ZrO2 also exhibits efficient antibacterial activity in polymer nanocomposites, e.g., the PVA-PEG-PVP-ZrO2 nanocomposites have established efficient antibacterial potential against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [63]. ZrO2 NPs displayed a maximum inhibition zone against A. niger (18 mm) and S. aureus (19 mm) using a maximum concentration of 200 μg/mL [64]. Similarly, Zn-ZrO2/TiO2 coatings synthesized on a titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) surface demonstrate excellent antibacterial activity against S. aureus, as shown in Figure 3. The figure reveals that the other sample-containing plates contain bacterial colonies in large numbers, while the sample Zn-ZrO2/TiO2 coatings almost kill all of the bacterial colonies, indicating their excellent in vitro antibacterial activity. The surface-ionized ions (Zn2+ or Zr4+) interact with the negatively charged cell membranes, cause the alternation of bacterial cell permeability, and damage the integrity of cell membranes. This will eventually lead to cytosolic leakage and cause bacterial death [65]. Tetragonal and monoclinic ZrO2 phases were deposited on stainless steel (316 L SS) and effectively protected bacterial invasion against the pathogenic P. aeruginosa and the subsequent biofilm formation [66].
The release of Zr4+ ions control the spread as well as the growth of bacterial strains. The release of Zr4+ ions lead to the leaking of the cell wall membrane. The metal ions admitted in the bacterial cell promote the electrostatic interaction and lead to the production of ROS, which deactivate protein and DNA molecules. This damage to protein and DNA in the bacterial system cuts off their communications and food systems and leads to bacterial cell death [67]. The antibacterial effect of ZrO2 NPs is attributed generally to the rupturing of the outer bacterial membranes by ROS, mostly OH radicals, which results in phospholipid per oxidation and finally causes cell death [68]. The cell wall of the Gram-negative bacteria, e.g., K. pneumonia, is composed of a peptidoglycan thin layer and has a lipid membrane outside. The ROS produced by ZrO2 NPs are responsible for the microorganism’s cell death. The generation of ROS cannot develop any resistance because these species attack different biomolecules and multiple different sites of the microorganism, leading to oxidation and, finally, cell death. An effective result demonstrated by the Gram-negative bacteria might be due to the electrostatic attraction of the positively charged Zr+ ions and the more negatively charged cell wall of bacteria, resulting in the rupturing of the cell wall of bacteria and, finally, cell death. Gram-positive bacteria, e.g., S. aureus, have a thick layer of peptidoglycan, which acts as a barrier to the NPs entering the bacterial cell [69]. Table 2 represents the antibacterial activity of ZrO2 and some of its composite-based nanomaterials.

2.4. Anticancer Activity

The promising properties of ZrO2 NPs such as thermal stability, biocompatibility, and economical production make them superior materials in biological systems. ZrO2 NPs have been evaluated for their anticancer activity against various cell lines [78]. A ZnO/ZrO2/rGO (reduced graphene oxide) nanocomposite prepared via the green approach using ginger rhizome extract displayed effective anticancer activity in humans. The results represent that ZnO/ZrO2/rGO NCs display higher anticancer efficacy in lung cancer (A549) cells and human breast cancer (MCF7) and display good cytocompatibility in normal cell lines and breast epithelial (MCF10A) and human lung fibroblasts (IMR90) cells [79]. ZrO2/rGO NCs were prepared using the aqueous leaf extract of Andrographis paniculate via a one-pot solvothermal green synthetic approach, showed excellent anticancer activity toward human A549 and HCT116 cancer cell lines, and did not cause any adverse effect on normal cells (hMSCs) [80]. ZrO2 NPs synthesized using Eucalyptus globulus leaf extract as an efficient reducing as well as capping agent demonstrate efficient anticancer activities towards the tested cell lines, e.g., A-549 lung cancer cell lines and HCT-116 colon cancer [81].

2.5. Bone Tissue Engineering

ZrO2 is a kind of bio-ceramic material that has received increased attention in biomimetic scaffolds owing to its great chemical stability, excellent biocompatibility, and high mechanical strength. ZrO2 has been used widely in the field of bone tissue engineering owing to its excellent properties, such as in film or coating on other implants, bone cement, bone graft substitutes, dental prosthesis, and implants, and is therefore preferred as a significant bio-ceramic material in bone repair. Zirconia-based nanocomposites are used widely in bone tissue materials owing to their wear resistance, high mechanical strength, and low-temperature sintering properties [82]. Zirconium oxide is classified as a bioinert ceramic because it is only morphologically fixed with the surrounding tissue after implantation and does not provide chemical or biological bonding [83]. Porous ZrO2 scaffolds can be utilized for the restoration of large bone defects because of their favorable biocompatibility, chemical bioinertness, and mechanical strength. Owing to the non-degradable properties of ZrO2, its scaffold can assist as a permanent implant material, which provides suitable mechanical support for the tissues as well as a host environment for cell infiltration, waste disposal, nutrient transport, new tissue generation, etc. [84].
Y-ZrO2 (Yttria-stabilized zirconia) is a stable material having superior mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and an anti-corrosive nature, suggesting its efficient suitability as the in vivo best choice for bone regeneration-based applications over an extended duration [85]. BCP (biphasic calcium phosphate) scaffold reinforced with ZrO2 was fabricated via fused deposition modeling for bone tissue engineering. BCP scaffold containing 10 wt% ZrO2 powder had higher compressive strength. The BCP/ZrO2 scaffold exhibited efficient biocompatibility on MG63 cell proliferation for 7 days. Human mesenchymal stem cells exhibited great viability on the BCP/ZrO2 scaffolds over 21 days in culture [86]. The ZrO2/β-TCP scaffold porosity was adjusted from 65% to 84%, while the compressive strength increased to 6.25 MPa from 4.95, when the ZrO2 amount was increased from 30 to 50 wt%. The in vitro study revealed that an osteoblasts-loaded ZrO2/β-TCP scaffold provided a suitable 3D environment for osteoblast survival and enhanced bone regeneration. The SEM images of the differentiated cells cultured in the scaffolds having different compositions are demonstrated in Figure 4. The osteocyte cell adhesion as well as proliferation in the ZrO2/b-TCP scaffold was significantly improved in the ZrO2.Y2O3/b-TCP: 30/70 samples [87]. Similarly, a porous magnetic-zirconia calcium bio-nanocomposite scaffold placed in the simulated body fluid displayed the formation of a bone-resembling apatite layer on the surfaces of the nanocomposite having a higher content of magnetic NPs (Fe3O4). A biocompatibility assessment revealed that composite scaffolds did not display any toxicity in contact with bone marrow stem cells and increased the growth and proliferation of cells [88]. The other reported ZrO2-based materials used in bone tissue engineering are ZrO2-SiO2 ceramic composites [89], TiO2-ZrO2 nanocomposites [90], ZrO2/RGO and ZrO2/RGO/HA [39], zirconia/hydroxyapatite ceramic composites [91], MWCNTs/ZrO2-CaO/Poly(methyl methacrylate) biocomposite [92], ZrO2-nanoparticle-doped CTS–PVA–HAP composites [93], Hap-ZrO2-Hbn biocomposites [94], Zirconia-toughened hydroxyapatite biocomposites [95], etc.

2.6. Dentistry

ZrO2 has been introduced in dentistry due to its superior biomechanical properties (strength, toughness, fatigue resistance, low elasticity module, and fracture strength), biocompatibility, excellent wear resistance, and its similar color to natural tooth [96,97]. Due to the morphological fixation with their surrounding tissues without forming any biological or chemical bonding, ZrO2 has been investigated for dentistry applications [98]. As the demand for cosmetic dental procedures has increased, ZrO2 has become a popular material due to its better biocompatibility, pleasing appearance, strong oxidation resistance, and improved mechanical properties. Moreover, ZrO2 has not been associated with any allergic reactions. Technological advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning have enabled the development of innovative biological applications of ZrO2 in dental devices. The increasing interest in applying AI in ZrO2 research and therapy is due to its capability to analyze data and identify correlations between seemingly unrelated events [99]. The zirconia types, which are recently introduced in the market, are effectively commercialized for dental rehabilitation such as inlay, crowns, veneers, onlay (VINCRON), and also in fixed partial dentures [100].
The addition of ZrO2 to a 3D-printed resin significantly improved the antimicrobial capability of the resulting resin without causing any cellular side effects. This modification has an auspicious future in the field of dentistry for fabricating long-term provisional restorations [101]. The Ti-Zr alloy has high corrosion resistance due to the formation of ZrO2 and TiO2 on the surface and their combined effect [102]. A study revealed that introducing 5% glass fillers and 10–20% ZrO2 NPs efficiently improves the biocompatibility and flexural strength of the dental resin material. The addition of 10%, 20% ZrO2, and 5% glass silica by weight meaningfully increases the flexural strength of the resulting 3D-printed resins [103]. ZrO2 NP coatings to teeth also strengthen the teeth externally and increase their lifespan. ZrO2 NPs would bind on the surface of bacteria and stop their metabolic activity with food, thus preventing acid synthesis and enamel corrosion because acid penetrates teeth, dissolves enamel, and causes cavity formation. This protection phenomenon can be understood from Figure 5 [104]. Various nanocomposites of ZrO2 are reported for their utilization in dental applications such as PMMA-ZrO2 nanocomposites [105], 3D-printed resin reinforced with modified ZrO2 NPs [106], etc.

2.7. Biosensing

Zirconia is an attractive material due to its high bioactivity for biomolecules [107]. ZrO2 exhibits high stability under surrounding conditions such as pH, temperature, and moisture and demonstrates potential biosensing application [108]. The properties of ZrO2 such as low toxicity, high chemical inertness, environment friendly nature, thermal stability, cost-effective production, biocompatibility, and electrochemical activity pave its way to being a superior electrode material in the sensing of various substances [109]. ZrO2 NPs have received increased attention in bio-analytical applications due to their lack of toxicity, chemical inertness, and affinity for oxygen-containing groups [110] and have been used In modified electrodes [111]. Along with these distinguished properties, ZrO2 NPs have been investigated for the development of biosensors [112]. However, some limitations associated with ZrO2 NPs such as the high aggregation tendency, lower conductivity, and absence of desired functional groups reduce its biosensing and electrochemical performance. Therefore, hybrid systems are highly recommended, which can improve the biosensing and electrochemical characteristics by utilizing the full potential of ZrO2 NPs [113]. Zr-based coordination polymers have high stability and can be endowed with activity for electrochemical sensing [114]. A mesoporous ZrO2-Ag-G-SiO2 and In2O3-G-SiO2 (G for graphene oxide) biosensor were found to be highly selective in detecting E. coli bacteria and could identify an individual E. coli cell in 1 μL volume of the sample within 30 s [115]. CeO2-ZrO2 hollow nanospheres and chitosan composite film were deposited on a Au electrode and used for fabricating a DNA biosensor. The study suggested that the targeted DNA could be detected over a wide range of 1.63 × 10−13 M to 1.63 × 10−8 M with a 1.0 × 10−13 M detection limit using methylene blue dye as an electrochemical indicator. The elaborated fabrication of the composite and the detection mechanism for the designed DNA biosensor are illustrated in Figure 6 [116]. Various ZrO2-based materials are utilized for biosensing applications, such as ZrO2/Chitosan composites [117,118], nZrO2@PC [119], CeO2-ZrO2 composites [120], ZrO2@CuNCs [121], Gox-PLL/RGO-ZrO2 composites [122], TiO2-ZrO2 nanocomposites [123], GQDs@La3+@ZrO2 [124], ChOx/Cu2O@MnO2-ZrO2@AuNPs/GCE [125], ZrO2 NPs in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoroacetate [126], ZrO2-NPs/MacroPSi EGFET [127], polyaniline–graphene oxide composites decorated with ZrO2 NPs [128], etc.

3. Challenges

Due to polymorphism, pure ZrO2 cannot be utilized in any application owing to its volume expansion (4–5%) occurring during cooling. This can be prevented by stabilizing oxides such as MgO, CaO, Sc2O3 CeO2, and Y2O3, which are used for retaining their metastable tetragonal phase [129]. Doping of a noble metal and/or metal oxide into ZrO2 is also a feasible approach for minimizing the drawbacks associated with ZrO2 [130]. Due to the extensive use of NPs, they can enter the environment via many routes, undergo transformations, and pose toxicity to organisms in different environmental compartments [131]. NPs may cross different cellular barriers when entering the human body and ultimately reach the most sensitive organs such as the lung, liver, and kidney. This phenomenon may result in DNA mutations, mitochondrial damage, and, eventually, cell death [132].

4. Future Perspectives

➢
The extensive use of ZrO2 NPs suggests the dire need to evaluate their adverse effects on the biological systems because limited literature is reported on the evaluation of toxic behaviors of ZrO2-based nanomaterials (NMs) with respect to cytotoxicity, bioactivity, and antioxidant activity [50]. Environmental issues should be considered before using ZrO2 NMs for any biomedical applications, which can cause environmental hazards and can also affect livings things.
➢
It is highly suggested to carry out theoretical simulations along with performing experimental work because DFT calculations help to predict in advance the desired goal and suggested mechanism and support the experimental results.
➢
It is suggested to evaluate different biological activities and applications of ZrO2 NMs, which will lead to their multifunctional behaviors that will increase their medical value.
➢
In biosensing applications, the selectivity of ZrO2-based biosensors is very important for their accurate and precise sensing.
➢
Manipulation of the size, shape, and morphology of the ZrO2 NPs could lead to achieving optimized activities in various biological applications because these parameters greatly affect their activity. Controlling these parameters can achieve the desired goals in biological applications.

5. Conclusions

Due to its non-hazardous nature, excellent properties, and diversified applications, ZrO2 is considered an important candidate material in the fields of medicine and pharmacy. ZrO2 NP-based nanomaterials with extraordinary characteristics have been used in the recent area of biomedicine, owing to their non-toxic nature, excellent biocompatibility, and high chemical stability. ZrO2 NP-based NMs exhibited outstanding antibacterial, anticancer, and antioxidant activities due to their unique biological properties. The precise biosensing applications of ZrO2 towards glucose and other biological species are due to its high bioactivity for biomolecules and high stability under surrounding conditions such as pH, temperature, moisture, etc. In the future, assessing the toxicity of ZrO2 NPs before evaluating their biological applications is highly recommended.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created in this review article.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kaushal, S.; Kumari, V.; Singh, P.P. Sunlight-Driven Photocatalytic Degradation of Ciprofloxacin and Organic Dyes by Biosynthesized RGO–ZrO2 Nanocomposites. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 65602–65617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Shahid, M.; Ferrand, E.; Schreck, E.; Dumat, C. Behavior and Impact of Zirconium in the Soil–Plant System: Plant Uptake and Phytotoxicity. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; Whitacre, D., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; Volume 221. [Google Scholar]
  3. Arshad, H.M.; Shahzad, A.; Shahid, S.; Ali, S.; Rauf, A.; Sharif, S.; Ullah, M.E.; Ullah, M.I.; Ali, M.; Ahmad, H.I. Synthesis and Biomedical Applications of Zirconium Nanoparticles: Advanced Leaps and Bounds in the Recent Past. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 4910777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Malode, S.J.; Shetti, N.P. ZrO2 in Biomedical Applications. In Metal Oxides for Biomedical and Biosensor Applications; Mondal, K., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 471–501. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sikdar, S.; Banu, A.; Ali, S.; Barman, S.; Kalar, P.L.; Das, R. Micro-Structural Analysis and Photocatalytic Properties of Green Synthesized t-ZrO2 Nanoparticles. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202103953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gurushantha, K.; Anantharaju, K.S.; Nagabhushana, H.; Sharma, S.C.; Vidya, Y.S.; Shivakumara, C.; Nagaswarupa, H.P.; Prashantha, S.C.; Anilkumar, M.R. Facile Green Fabrication of Iron-Doped Cubic ZrO2 Nanoparticles by Phyllanthus Acidus: Structural, Photocatalytic and Photoluminescent Properties. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2015, 397, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Keiteb, A.S.; Saion, E.; Zakaria, A.; Soltani, N. Structural and Optical Properties of Zirconia Nanoparticles by Thermal Treatment Synthesis. J. Nanomater. 2016, 2016, 1913609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Cotes, C.; Arata, A.; Melo, R.M.; Bottino, M.A.; Machado, J.P.B.; Souza, R.O.A. Effects of Aging Procedures on the Topographic Surface, Structural Stability, and Mechanical Strength of a ZrO2-Based Dental Ceramic. Dent. Mater. 2014, 30, e396–e404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lamas, D.G.; Rosso, A.M.; Anzorena, M.S.; Fernández, A.; Bellino, M.G.; Cabezas, M.D.; Walsöe de Reca, N.E.; Craievich, A.F. Crystal Structure of Pure ZrO2 Nanopowders. Scr. Mater. 2006, 55, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumari, S.; Sharma, E.; Verma, J.; Dalal, J.; Kumar, A. Structural and Photoluminescence Properties of Dy-Doped Nanocrystalline ZrO2 for Optoelectronics Application. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 20185–20192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Keerthana, L.; Sakthivel, C.; Prabha, I. MgO-ZrO2 Mixed Nanocomposites: Fabrication Methods and Applications. Mater. Today Sustain. 2019, 3, 100007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumari, N.; Sareen, S.; Verma, M.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, A.; Sohal, H.S.; Mehta, S.K.; Park, J.; Mutreja, V. Zirconia-Based Nanomaterials: Recent Developments in Synthesis and Applications. Nanoscale Adv. 2022, 4, 4210–4236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yin, L.; Nakanishi, Y.; Alao, A.R.; Song, X.F.; Abduo, J.; Zhang, Y. A Review of Engineered Zirconia Surfaces in Biomedical Applications. Procedia CIRP 2017, 65, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, Y.W.; Moussi, J.; Drury, J.L.; Wataha, J.C. Zirconia in Biomedical Applications. Expert. Rev. Med. Devices 2016, 13, 945–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rebuttini, V.; Pucci, A.; Arosio, P.; Bai, X.; Locatelli, E.; Pinna, N.; Lascialfari, A.; Franchini, M.C. Zirconia-Doped Nanoparticles: Organic Coating, Polymeric Entrapment and Application as Dual-Imaging Agents. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 919–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ahmed, W.; Iqbal, J. Co Doped ZrO2 Nanoparticles: An Efficient Visible Light Triggered Photocatalyst with Enhanced Structural, Optical and Dielectric Characteristics. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 25833–25844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Qi, B.; Liang, S.; Li, Y.; Zhou, C.; Yu, H.; Li, J. ZrO2 Matrix Toughened Ceramic Material-Strength and Toughness. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2022, 24, 2101278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Alagarsamy, A.; Chandrasekaran, S.; Manikandan, A. Green Synthesis and Characterization Studies of Biogenic Zirconium Oxide (ZrO2) Nanoparticles for Adsorptive Removal of Methylene Blue Dye. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1247, 131275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Han, Z.; Liu, S.; Qiu, K.; Liu, J.; Zou, R.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Liu, F.; Wang, Y.; Li, L. The Enhanced ZrO2 Produced by DLP via a Reliable Plasticizer and Its Dental Application. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2023, 141, 105751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gurav, R.P.; Nalawade, R.D.; Sawant, S.D.; Satyanarayan, N.D.; Sankpal, S.A.; Hangirgekar, S.P. Biosynthesis of ZrO2 for ZrO2@Ag-S-CH2COOH as the Retrievable Catalyst for the One-Pot Green Synthesis of Pyrazoline Derivatives and Their Anticancer Evaluation. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2022, 36, e6666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sathyaseelan, B.; Manikandan, E.; Baskaran, I.; Senthilnathan, K.; Sivakumar, K.; Moodley, M.K.; Ladchumananandasivam, R.; Maaza, M. Studies on Structural and Optical Properties of ZrO2 Nanopowder for Opto-Electronic Applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 694, 556–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Palmero, P. Zirconia-Based Composites for Biomedical Applications. In Bioceramics and Biocomposites: From Research to Clinical Practice; Antoniac, I., Ed.; Wiley-American Ceramic Society: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 57–85. [Google Scholar]
  23. Saeed, K.; Sadiq, M.; Khan, I.; Ullah, S.; Ali, N.; Khan, A. Synthesis, Characterization, and Photocatalytic Application of Pd/ZrO2 and Pt/ZrO2. Appl. Water Sci. 2018, 8, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Khan, I.; Zada, N.; Khan, I.; Sadiq, M.; Saeed, K. Enhancement of Photocatalytic Potential and Recoverability of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles by Decorating over Monoclinic Zirconia. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2020, 18, 1473–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Seynnaeve, B.; Folens, K.; Krishnaraj, C.; Ilic, I.K.; Liedel, C.; Schmidt, J.; Verberckmoes, A.; Du Laing, G.; Leus, K.; Van Der Voort, P. Oxygen-Rich Poly-Bisvanillonitrile Embedded Amorphous Zirconium Oxide Nanoparticles as Reusable and Porous Adsorbent for Removal of Arsenic Species from Water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 413, 125356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, X.; Cheng, W.; Yu, Y.; Jiang, S.; Xu, Y.; Zong, E. Magnetic ZrO2/PEI/Fe3O4 Functionalized MWCNTs Composite with Enhanced Phosphate Removal Performance and Easy Separability. Compos. B Eng. 2022, 237, 109861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, J.; Ji, G.; Wu, Q. Preparation of Epoxy/ZrO2 Composite Coating on the Q235 Surface by Electrostatic Spraying and Its Corrosion Resistance in 3.5% NaCl Solution. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 10625–10633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Shrivastav, V.; Sundriyal, S.; Tiwari, U.K.; Kim, K.H.; Deep, A. Metal-Organic Framework Derived Zirconium Oxide/Carbon Composite as an Improved Supercapacitor Electrode. Energy 2021, 235, 121351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, Y.J.; Kim, G.-Y.; Kim, H.-S.; Kim, S.; Kim, B.; Choi, Y.J.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Ryu, W.-H. Highly Conductive ZrO2–x Spheres as Bifunctional Framework Stabilizers and Gas Evolution Relievers in Nickel-Rich Layered Cathodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Compos. B Eng. 2022, 238, 109911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ferlazzo, A.; Espro, C.; Iannazzo, D.; Moulaee, K.; Neri, G. A Novel Yttria-Doped ZrO2 Based Conductometric Sensor for Hydrogen Leak Monitoring. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 9819–9828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ando, B.; Baglio, S.; Castorina, S.; Graziani, S.; Tondepu, S.V.G.; Petralia, S.; Messina, M.A.; Maugeri, L.; Neri, G.; Ferlazzo, A. A Capacitive Sensor, Exploiting a YSZ Functional Layer, for Ammonia Detection. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2022, 71, 9505811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zahra, T.; Ahmad, K.S.; Zequine, C.; Gupta, R.K.; Thomas, A.G.; Malik, M.A.; Jaffri, S.B.; Ali, D. Electro-Catalyst [ZrO2/ZnO/PdO]-NPs Green Functionalization: Fabrication, Characterization and Water Splitting Potential Assessment. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 19347–19362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hussein, A.M.; Iefanova, A.V.; Koodali, R.T.; Logue, B.A.; Shende, R.V. Interconnected ZrO2 Doped ZnO/TiO2 Network Photoanode for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Energy Rep. 2018, 4, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chakraborty, D.; Devi, M.; Das, B.; Dhar, S.S. Core-Shell Assembly of ZrO2 Nanoparticles with Ionic Liquid: A Novel and Highly Efficient Heterogeneous Catalysts for Biginelli and Esterification Reactions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 13846–13861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Heng, L.; Kim, J.S.; Tu, J.F.; Mun, S.D. Fabrication of Precision Meso-Scale Diameter ZrO2 Ceramic Bars Using New Magnetic Pole Designs in Ultra-Precision Magnetic Abrasive Finishing. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 17335–17346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yuan, Y.; Wu, Y.; Suganthy, N.; Shanmugam, S.; Brindhadevi, K.; Sabour, A.; Alshiekheid, M.; Lan Chi, N.T.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Shanmuganathan, R. Biosynthesis of Zirconium Nanoparticles (ZrO2 NPs) by Phyllanthus Niruri Extract: Characterization and Its Photocatalytic Dye Degradation Activity. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 168, 113340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sani, I.K.; Geshlaghi, S.P.; Pirsa, S.; Asdagh, A. Composite Film Based on Potato Starch/Apple Peel Pectin/ZrO2 Nanoparticles/Microencapsulated Zataria Multiflora Essential Oil; Investigation of Physicochemical Properties and Use in Quail Meat Packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 117, 106719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, C.; Jiang, Z.; Zhao, L.; Guo, W.; Gao, X. Stability, rheological behaviors, and curing properties of 3Y–ZrO2 and 3Y–ZrO2/GO ceramic suspensions in stereolithography applied for dental implants. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 13344–13350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shadianlou, F.; Foorginejad, A.; Yaghoubinezhad, Y. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Zirconia-Based Nanocomposite Powder Reinforced by Graphene and Its Application for Bone Scaffold with 3D Printing. Adv. Powder Technol. 2022, 33, 103406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jayakumar, R.; Ramachandran, R.; Sudheesh Kumar, P.T.; Divyarani, V.V.; Srinivasan, S.; Chennazhi, K.P.; Tamura, H.; Nair, S.V. Fabrication of Chitin–Chitosan/Nano ZrO2 Composite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 49, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Suriyaraj, S.P.; Ramadoss, G.; Chandraraj, K.; Selvakumar, R. One Pot Facile Green Synthesis of Crystalline Bio-ZrO2 Nanoparticles Using Acinetobacter Sp. KCSI1 under Room Temperature. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 105, 110021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Satishkumar, M.; Sneha, K.; Yun, Y.-S. Green fabrication of zirconia nano-chains using novel Curcuma longa tuber extract. Mater. Lett. 2013, 98, 242–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Van Tran, T.; Nguyen, D.T.C.; Kumar, P.S.; Din, A.T.M.; Jalil, A.A.; Vo, D.V.N. Green Synthesis of ZrO2 Nanoparticles and Nanocomposites for Biomedical and Environmental Applications: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 20, 1309–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Goyal, P.; Bhardwaj, A.; Mehta, B.K.; Mehta, D. Research Article Green Synthesis of Zirconium Oxide Nanoparticles (ZrO2NPs) Using Helianthus Annuus Seed and Their Antimicrobial Effects. J. Indian. Chem. Soc. 2021, 98, 100089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hasan, I.M.A.; Salah El-Din, H.; AbdElRaady, A.A. Peppermint-Mediated Green Synthesis of Nano ZrO2 and Its Adsorptive Removal of Cobalt from Water. Inorganics 2022, 10, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gul, T.; Saeed, K.; Ahmad, S.; Almehmadi, M.; Alsaiari, A.A.; Alsharif, A.; Khan, I. Investigation of the Photocatalytic and Biological Applications of Iron Oxide–Indium Oxide Nanocomposite. Chem. Pap. 2023, 1, 4547–4558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gul, T.; Khan, I.; Ahmad, B.; Ahmad, S.; Alsaiari, A.A.; Almehmadi, M.; Abdulaziz, O.; Alsharif, A.; Khan, I.; Saeed, K. Efficient Photodegradation of Methyl Red Dye by Kaolin Clay Supported Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles with Their Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities. Heliyon 2023, 9, e16738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Haq, S.; Afsar, H.; Ali, M.B.; Almalki, M.; Albogami, B.; Hedfi, A. Green Synthesis and Characterization of a ZnO-ZrO2 Heterojunction for Environmental and Biological Applications. Crystals 2021, 11, 1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Narasaiah, B.P.; Koppala, S.; Kar, P.; Lokesh, B.; Mandal, B.K. Photocatalytic and Antioxidant Studies of Bioinspired ZrO2 Nanoparticles Using Agriculture Waste Durva Grass Aqueous Extracts. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2022, 7, 100112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Karunakaran, G.; Suriyaprabha, R.; Manivasakan, P.; Yuvakkumar, R.; Rajendran, V.; Kannan, N. Screening of In Vitro Cytotoxicity, Antioxidant Potential and Bioactivity of Nano- and Micro-ZrO2 and -TiO2 Particles. Ecotoxicol. Env. Saf. 2013, 93, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Imran, M.; Riaz, S.; Shah, S.M.H.; Batool, T.; Khan, H.N.; Sabri, A.N.; Naseem, S. In-Vitro Hemolytic Activity and Free Radical Scavenging by Sol-Gel Synthesized Fe3O4 Stabilized ZrO2 Nanoparticles. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 7598–7608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Annu, A.; Sivasankari, C.; Krupasankar, U. Synthesis and Characerization of ZrO2 Nanoparticle by Leaf Extract Bioreduction Process for Its Biological Studies. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 33, 5317–5323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tijani, J.O.; Odeh, E.I.; Mustapha, S.; Egbosiuba, T.C.; Daniel, A.I.; Abdulkareem, A.S.; Muya, F.N. Photocatalytic, Electrochemical, Antibacterial and Antioxidant Behaviour of Carbon-Sulphur Co-Doped Zirconium (IV) Oxide Nanocomposite. Clean. Chem. Eng. 2022, 3, 100034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Akram, S.; Bashir, M.; Majid, F.; Ayub, M.; Khan, B.S.; Saeed, A.; Shaik, M.R.; Khan, M.; Shaik, B. Stabilization of Zirconia Nanoparticles by Collagen Protein and Calcium Carbonate Extracted from Eggshell and its Biodegradation, Radical Scavenging and Mineralization Activity. Arab. J. Chem. 2023, 105135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sarkar, A.; Ghosh, D.; Das, S.; Rao, K.V.B. Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activity of Biogenic Zirconium Oxide Nanoparticles from Candida Orthopsilosis DSB1 Isolated from Backwaters of Sunderbans, West Bengal. Int. J. Nanopart. 2021, 13, 174–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Batool, T.; Bukhari, B.S.; Riaz, S.; Batoo, K.M.; Raslan, E.H.; Hadi, M.; Naseem, S. Microwave Assisted Sol-Gel Synthesis of Bioactive Zirconia Nanoparticles—Correlation of Strength and Structure. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020, 112, 104012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sanaullah, I.; Imran, M.; Riaz, S.; Amin, T.; Khan, I.U.; Zahoor, R.; Shahid, A.; Naseem, S. Microwave Assisted Synthesis of Fe3O4 Stabilized ZrO2 Nanoparticles—Free Radical Scavenging, Radiolabeling and Biodistribution in Rabbits. Life Sci. 2021, 271, 119070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Prabha, N.; Kiruthika, N.; Jayapriya, G.; Maheswari, T.; Maruthupandy, M.; Vennila, M. Zirconium Oxide Supported Silver Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Characterization and In Vitro Evaluation of Anticancer, Antioxidant, Antibacterial Applications. SSRN 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kalirajan, C.; Behera, H.; Selvaraj, V.; Palanisamy, T. In Vitro Probing of Oxidized Inulin Cross-Linked Collagen-ZrO2 Hybrid Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 289, 119458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shailaja, N.R.; Arulmozhi, M.; Balraj, B.; Siva, C. Corallocarpus Epigaeus Mediated Synthesis of ZnO/CuO Integrated ZrO2 Nanoparticles for Enhanced In-Vitro Antibacterial, Antifungal and Antidiabetic Activities. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2023, 100, 100991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shailaja, N.R.; Arulmozhi, M.; Balraj, B. Two Step Green Plasmonic Synthesis of Gd3+/Nd3+ Ions Influenced ZrO2 Nanoparticles for Enhanced In-Vitro Antibacterial, Antifungal and Antidiabetic Activities. J. Mol. Struct. 2023, 1274, 134524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Salih, R.; Al-Jadiri, F.; Rahma, N.M.; Mershed, K.; Odeh, A.O.; Osifo, P.O.; Neomagus, H.J.P.W.; Ishihara, A.; Tominaka, S.; Nagai, T.; et al. Antimicrobial Activity of Zirconium Oxide Nanoparticles Prepared by the Sol-Gel Method. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 2114, 012058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kadhim, K.J.; Agool, I.R.; Hashim, A. Effect of Zirconium Oxide Nanoparticles on Dielectric Properties of (PVA-PEG-PVP) Blend for Medical Application. J. Adv. Phys. 2017, 6, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chau, T.P.; Veeraragavan, G.R.; Narayanan, M.; Chinnathambi, A.; Alharbi, S.A.; Subramani, B.; Brindhadevi, K.; Pimpimon, T.; Pikulkaew, S. Green Synthesis of Zirconium Nanoparticles Using Punica Granatum (Pomegranate) Peel Extract and Their Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potency. Environ. Res. 2022, 209, 112771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, R.; He, X.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yao, X.; Tang, B. Antimicrobial Property, Cytocompatibility and Corrosion Resistance of Zn-Doped ZrO2/TiO2 Coatings on Ti6Al4V Implants. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 75, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kaliaraj, G.S.; Vishwakarma, V.; Alagarsamy, K.; Kamalan Kirubaharan, A.M. Biological and Corrosion Behavior of M-ZrO2 and t-ZrO2 Coated 316L SS for Potential Biomedical Applications. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 14940–14946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chelliah, P.; Wabaidur, S.M.; Sharma, H.P.; Majdi, H.S.; Smait, D.A.; Najm, M.A.; Iqbal, A.; Lai, W.-C. Photocatalytic Organic Contaminant Degradation of Green Synthesized ZrO2 NPs and Their Antibacterial Activities. Separations 2023, 10, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Korde, S.A.; Thombre, P.B.; Dipake, S.S.; Sangshetti, J.N.; Rajbhoj, A.S.; Gaikwad, S.T. Neem Gum (Azadirachta Indicia) Facilitated Green Synthesis of TiO2 and ZrO2 Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Agents. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023, 153, 110777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tabassum, N.; Kumar, D.; Verma, D.; Bohara, R.A.; Singh, M.P. Zirconium Oxide (ZrO2) Nanoparticles from Antibacterial Activity to Cytotoxicity: A next-Generation of Multifunctional Nanoparticles. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 26, 102156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sultana, S.; Rafiuddin; Khan, M.Z.; Shahadat, M. Development of ZnO and ZrO2 Nanoparticles: Their Photocatalytic and Bactericidal Activity. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 886–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chau, T.P.; Kandasamy, S.; Chinnathambi, A.; Alahmadi, T.A.; Brindhadevi, K. Synthesis of Zirconia Nanoparticles Using Laurus Nobilis for Use as an Antimicrobial Agent. Appl. Nanosci. 2023, 13, 1337–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nova, C.V.; Reis, K.A.; Pinheiro, A.L.; Dalmaschio, C.J.; Chiquito, A.J.; Teodoro, M.D.; Rodrigues, A.D.; Longo, E.; Pontes, F.M. Synthesis, Characterization, Photocatalytic, and Antimicrobial Activity of ZrO2 Nanoparticles and Ag@ZrO2 Nanocomposite Prepared by the Advanced Oxidative Process/Hydrothermal Route. J. Solgel Sci. Technol. 2021, 98, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Amanulla, A.M.; Sundaram, R.; Kaviyarasu, K. An Investigation of Structural, Magnetical, Optical, Antibacterial and Humidity Sensing of Zr(MoO4)2-ZrO2 Nanocomposites. Surf. Interfaces 2019, 16, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, X.; Saravanakumar, K.; Sathiyaseelan, A.; Park, S.; Wang, M.H. Synthesis, Characterization, and Comparative Analysis of Antibiotics (Ampicillin and Erythromycin) Loaded ZrO2 Nanoparticles for Enhanced Antibacterial Activity. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 82, 104293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Anandhi, S.; Edward, M.L.; Jaisankar, V. Synthesis, Characterization and Antimicrobial Activity of Polyindole/ZrO2 Nanocomposites. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 40, S93–S101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lee, M.; Han, S.I.; Kim, C.; Velumani, S.; Han, A.; Kassiba, A.H.; Castaneda, H. ZrO2/ZnO/TiO2Nanocomposite Coatings on Stainless Steel for Improved Corrosion Resistance, Biocompatibility, and Antimicrobial Activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 13801–13811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Pandiyan, N.; Murugesan, B.; Sonamuthu, J.; Samayanan, S.; Mahalingam, S. Facile Biological Synthetic Strategy to Morphologically Aligned CeO2/ZrO2 Core Nanoparticles Using Justicia Adhatoda Extract and Ionic Liquid: Enhancement of Its Bio-Medical Properties. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2018, 178, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sumathi, P.; Renuka, N.; Subramanian, R.; Periyasami, G.; Rahaman, M.; Karthikeyan, P. Prospective in vitro A431 cell line anticancer efficacy of zirconia nanoflakes derived from Enicostemma littorale aqueous extract. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ahamed, M.; Lateef, R.; Khan, M.A.M.; Rajanahalli, P.; Akhtar, M.J. Biosynthesis, Characterization, and Augmented Anticancer Activity of ZrO2 Doped ZnO/RGO Nanocomposite. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kanth Kadiyala, N.; Mandal, B.K.; Kumar Reddy, L.V.; Barnes, C.H.W.; De Los Santos Valladares, L.; Sen, D. Efficient One-Pot Solvothermal Synthesis and Characterization of Zirconia Nanoparticle-Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites: Evaluation of Their Enhanced Anticancer Activity toward Human Cancer Cell Lines. ACS Omega 2022, 8, 2406–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Balaji, S.; Mandal, B.K.; Ranjan, S.; Dasgupta, N.; Chidambaram, R. Nano-Zirconia—Evaluation of Its Antioxidant and Anticancer Activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2017, 170, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Weng, W.; Wu, W.; Hou, M.; Liu, T.; Wang, T.; Yang, H. Review of Zirconia-Based Biomimetic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 8309–8333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Almalki, A.H.; Belal, A.; Farghali, A.A.; Mahmoud, R.; Mustafa, F.M.; Abd El-Mageed, H.R. Electronic, Mechanical, and Thermal Properties of Zirconium Dioxide Nanotube Interacting with Poly Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid and Chitosan as Potential Agents in Bone Tissue Engineering: Insights from Computational Approaches. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jin, M.; Sun, N.; Weng, W.; Sang, Z.; Liu, T.; Xia, W.; Wang, S.; Sun, X.; Wang, T.; Li, H.; et al. The Effect of GelMA/Alginate Interpenetrating Polymeric Network Hydrogel on the Performance of Porous Zirconia Matrix for Bone Regeneration Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242, 124820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Sakthiabirami, K.; Kang, J.H.; Jang, J.G.; Soundharrajan, V.; Lim, H.P.; Yun, K.D.; Park, C.; Lee, B.N.; Yang, Y.P.; Park, S.W. Hybrid Porous Zirconia Scaffolds Fabricated Using Additive Manufacturing for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 123, 111950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sa, M.W.; Nguyen, B.N.B.; Moriarty, R.A.; Kamalitdinov, T.; Fisher, J.P.; Kim, J.Y. Fabrication and Evaluation of 3D Printed BCP Scaffolds Reinforced with ZrO2 for Bone Tissue Applications. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2018, 115, 989–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Alizadeh, A.; Moztarzadeh, F.; Ostad, S.N.; Azami, M.; Geramizadeh, B.; Hatam, G.; Bizari, D.; Tavangar, S.M.; Vasei, M.; Ai, J. Synthesis of Calcium Phosphate-Zirconia Scaffold and Human Endometrial Adult Stem Cells for Bone Tissue Engineering. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2016, 44, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Jasemi, A.; Kamyab Moghadas, B.; Khandan, A.; Saber-Samandari, S. A Porous Calcium-Zirconia Scaffolds Composed of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Bone Cancer Treatment: Fabrication, Characterization and FEM Analysis. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 1314–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chang, C.H.; Lin, C.Y.; Chang, C.H.; Liu, F.H.; Huang, Y.T.; Liao, Y.S. Enhanced Biomedical Applicability of ZrO2–SiO2 Ceramic Composites in 3D Printed Bone Scaffolds. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Mahtabian, S.; Yahay, Z.; Mirhadi, S.M.; Tavangarian, F. Synthesis and Characterization of Hierarchical Mesoporous-Macroporous TiO2-ZrO2nanocomposite Scaffolds for Cancellous Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. J. Nanomater. 2020, 2020, 8305871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ferreira, C.R.D.; Santiago, A.A.G.; Vasconcelos, R.C.; Paiva, D.F.F.; Pirih, F.Q.; Araújo, A.A.; Motta, F.V.; Bomio, M.R.D. Study of Microstructural, Mechanical, and Biomedical Properties of Zirconia/Hydroxyapatite Ceramic Composites. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 12376–12386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kashan, J.S.; Al-Allaq, A.A.; Fouad, H.; Yahia, M.E. Effect of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube on the Microstructure, Physical and Mechanical Properties of ZrO2–CaO/Poly(methyl methacrylate) Biocomposite for Bone Reconstruction Application. Sci. Adv. Mater. 2023, 15, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bhowmick, A.; Pramanik, N.; Mitra, T.; Gnanamani, A.; Das, M.; Kundu, P.P. Mechanical and Biological Investigations of Chitosan–Polyvinyl Alcohol Based ZrO2 Doped Porous Hybrid Composites for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 7524–7530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gautam, A.; Gautam, C.; Mishra, M.; Sahu, S.; Nanda, R.; Kisan, B.; Gautam, R.K.; Prakash, R.; Sharma, K.; Singh, D.; et al. Synthesis, Structural, Mechanical, and Biological Properties of HAp-ZrO2-HBN Biocomposites for Bone Regeneration Applications. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 30203–30220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhang, J.; Huang, D.; Liu, S.; Dong, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Z.; Su, Q.; Huang, W.; Zheng, W.; et al. Zirconia Toughened Hydroxyapatite Biocomposite Formed by a DLP 3D Printing Process for Potential Bone Tissue Engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 105, 110054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Abd-Elwahed, M.S.; Ibrahim, A.F.; Reda, M.M. Effects of ZrO2 Nanoparticle Content on Microstructure and Wear Behavior of Titanium Matrix Composite. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 8528–8534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Seo, J.Y.; Oh, D.; Kim, D.J.; Kim, K.M.; Kwon, J.S. Enhanced Mechanical Properties of ZrO2-Al2O3 Dental Ceramic Composites by Altering Al2O3 Form. Dent. Mater. 2020, 36, e117–e125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Teimouri, A.; Ebrahimi, R.; Emadi, R.; Beni, B.H.; Chermahini, A.N. Nano-Composite of Silk Fibroin–Chitosan/Nano ZrO2 for Tissue Engineering Applications: Fabrication and Morphology. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 76, 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Singh, J.; Singh, S.; Verma, A. Artificial Intelligence in Use of ZrO2 Material in Biomedical Science. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 2023, 13, 83–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Nevarez-Rascon, A.; Aguilar-Elguezabal, A.; Orrantia, E.; Bocanegra-Bernal, M.H. Al2O3(w)–Al2O3(n)–ZrO2 (TZ-3Y)n Multi-Scale Nanocomposite: An Alternative for Different Dental Applications? Acta Biomater. 2010, 6, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Aati, S.; Shrestha, B.; Fawzy, A. Cytotoxicity and Antimicrobial Efficiency of ZrO2 Nanoparticles Reinforced 3D Printed Resins. Dent. Mater. 2022, 38, 1432–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Shahmohammadi, M.; Sun, Y.; Yuan, J.C.C.; Mathew, M.T.; Sukotjo, C.; Takoudis, C.G. In Vitro Corrosion Behavior of Coated Ti6Al4V with TiO2, ZrO2, and TiO2/ZrO2 Mixed Nanofilms Using Atomic Layer Deposition for Dental Implants. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 444, 128686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Alshamrani, A.; Alhotan, A.; Kelly, E.; Ellakwa, A.; Mechanical, B.; Alshamrani, A.; Alhotan, A.; Kelly, E.; Ellakwa, A. Mechanical and Biocompatibility Properties of 3D-Printed Dental Resin Reinforced with Glass Silica and Zirconia Nanoparticles: In Vitro Study. Polymers 2023, 15, 2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Fathima, J.B.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Venis, R. Synthesis and Characterization of ZrO2 Nanoparticles-Antimicrobial Activity and Their Prospective Role in Dental Care. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 110, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kumari, S.; Hussain, A.; Rao, J.; Singh, K.; Avinashi, S.K.; Gautam, C. Structural, mechanical and biological properties of PMMA-ZrO2 nanocomposites for denture applications. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 295, 127089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Aati, S.; Akram, Z.; Ngo, H.; Fawzy, A.S. Development of 3D Printed Resin Reinforced with Modified ZrO2 Nanoparticles for Long-Term Provisional Dental Restorations. Dent. Mater. 2021, 37, e360–e374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Tong, Z.; Yuan, R.; Chai, Y.; Xie, Y.; Chen, S. A Novel and Simple Biomolecules Immobilization Method: Electro-Deposition ZrO2 Doped with HRP for Fabrication of Hydrogen Peroxide Biosensor. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 128, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Xiao, K.; Meng, L.; Du, C.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J. A Label-Free Photoelectrochemical Biosensor with near-Zero-Background Noise for Protein Kinase A Activity Assay Based on Porous ZrO2/CdS Octahedra. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 328, 129096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mogha, N.K.; Sahu, V.; Sharma, M.; Sharma, R.K.; Masram, D.T. Biocompatible ZrO2- Reduced Graphene Oxide Immobilized AChE Biosensor for Chlorpyrifos Detection. Mater. Des. 2016, 111, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Peng, H.P.; Liang, R.P.; Zhang, L.; Qiu, J.D. Sonochemical Synthesis of Magnetic Core–Shell Fe3O4@ZrO2 Nanoparticles and Their Application to the Highly Effective Immobilization of Myoglobin for Direct Electrochemistry. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 4231–4236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sun, W.; Wang, X.; Sun, X.; Deng, Y.; Liu, J.; Lei, B.; Sun, Z. Simultaneous Electrochemical Determination of Guanosine and Adenosine with Graphene–ZrO2 Nanocomposite Modified Carbon Ionic Liquid Electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 44, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ferlazzo, A.; Espro, C.; Iannazzo, D.; Bonavita, A.; Neri, G. Yttria-Zirconia Electrochemical Sensor for the Detection of Tyrosine. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 35, 106036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Gupta, P.K.; Chauhan, D.; Khan, Z.H.; Solanki, P.R. ZrO2 Nanoflowers Decorated with Graphene Quantum Dots for Electrochemical Immunosensing. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 2506–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Yan, T.; Zhang, X.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, W.Y. Stable Zr(Iv) Coordination Polymers with Electroactive Metal-Terpyridine Units for Enhanced Electrochemical Sensing Dopamine. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2022, 11, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Fatema, K.N.; Liu, Y.; Cho, K.Y.; Oh, W.C. Comparative Study of Electrochemical Biosensors Based on Highly Efficient Mesoporous ZrO2-Ag-G-SiO2and In 2O3-G-SiO2 for Rapid Recognition of E. coli O157:H7. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 22719–22730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wang, Q.; Gao, F.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, B.; Li, S.; Hu, Z.; Gao, F. Electrochemical Characterization and DNA Sensing Application of a Sphere-like CeO2–ZrO2 and Chitosan Nanocomposite Formed on a Gold Electrode by One-Step Electrodeposition. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 62, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Yang, Y.; Yang, H.; Yang, M.; Liu, Y.; Shen, G.; Yu, R. Amperometric Glucose Biosensor Based on a Surface Treated Nanoporous ZrO2/Chitosan Composite Film as Immobilization Matrix. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 525, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yang, Y.; Guo, M.; Yang, M.; Wang, Z.; Shen, G.; Yu, R. Determination of Pesticides in Vegetable Samples Using an Acetylcholinesterase Biosensor Based on Nanoparticles ZrO2/Chitosan Composite Film. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2005, 85, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kumar, Y.; Nirbhaya, V.; Chauhan, D.; Shankar, S.; Chandra, R.; Kumar, S. Nanostructured Zirconia Embedded Porous Carbon Based Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Biosensor for SAA Biomarker Detection. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 294, 126983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Gao, F.; Xu, Z.; Wang, Q.; Hu, Z.; Gu, G. Preparation, Characterization of CeO2-ZrO2 Composite Hollow Microspheres and Their Application as Electrocatalysis Materials for Hemoglobin in Biosensor. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2009, 30, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Li, S.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Z.; Jia, Q. Spatially Confining Copper Nanoclusters in Porous ZrO2 for Fluorescence/Colorimetry/Smartphone Triple-Mode Detection of Metoprolol Tartrate. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 231, 115290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Vilian, A.T.E.; Chen, S.M.; Ali, M.A.; Al-Hemaid, F.M.A. Direct Electrochemistry of Glucose Oxidase Immobilized on ZrO2 Nanoparticles-Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheets for a Glucose Biosensor. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 30358–30367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Srivastava, S.; Ali, M.A.; Solanki, P.R.; Chavhan, P.M.; Pandey, M.K.; Mulchandani, A.; Srivastava, A.; Malhotra, B.D. Mediator-Free Microfluidics Biosensor Based on Titania—Zirconia Nanocomposite for Urea Detection. RSC Adv. 2012, 3, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Trinadh, T.; Khuntia, H.; Anusha, T.; Bhavani, K.S.; Kumar, J.V.S.; Brahman, P.K. Synthesis and Characterization of Nanocomposite Material Based on Graphene Quantum Dots and Lanthanum Doped Zirconia Nanoparticles: An Electrochemical Sensing Application towards Flutamide in Urine Samples. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2020, 110, 108143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ouiram, T.; Moonla, C.; Preechaworapun, A.; Muangpil, S.; Maneeprakorn, W.; Tangkuaram, T. Choline Oxidase Based Composite ZrO2@AuNPs with Cu2O@MnO2 Platform for Signal Enhancing the Choline Biosensors. Electroanalysis 2021, 33, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Tapak, N.S.; Nawawi, M.A.; Tjih, E.T.T.; Mohd, Y.; Rashid, A.H.A.; Abdullah, J.; Yusof, N.A.; Ahmad, N.M. The Synthesis of Zirconium Oxide (ZrO2) Nanoparticles (NPs) in 1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium Trifluoroacetate (BMIMCF3COO) for an Amperometry Phenol Biosensor. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 33, 104142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Asoka, S.A.; Slewa, L.H.; Abbas, T.A. Multi-Ion (Na+/ K+/Ca2+/Mg2+) EGFET Sensor Based on Heterostructure of ZrO2-NPs/MacroPSi. Chem. Pap. 2023, 77, 1351–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Valsalakumar, V.C.; Joseph, A.S.; Piyus, J.; Vasudevan, S. Polyaniline-Graphene Oxide Composites Decorated with ZrO2 Nanoparticles for Use in Screen-Printed Electrodes for Real-Time l-Tyrosine Sensing. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 8395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Gionea, A.; Andronescu, E.; Voicu, G.; Bleotu, C.; Surdu, V.A. Influence of Hot Isostatic Pressing on ZrO2–CaO Dental Ceramics Properties. Int. J. Pharm. 2016, 510, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zahra, T.; Ahmad, K.S.; Zequine, C.; Gupta, R.; Thomas, A.; Malik, M.A.; Iram, S.; Ali, D. Biomimmetic ZrO2@PdO Nanocomposites: Fabrication, Characterization, and Water Splitting Potential Exploration. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 8516–8526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, Z.; Ye, N.; Fang, H.; Wang, D. TiO2, SiO2 and ZrO2 Nanoparticles Synergistically Provoke Cellular Oxidative Damage in Freshwater Microalgae. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Sengul, A.B.; Asmatulu, E. Toxicity of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 18, 1659–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 05428 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the space group of three different polymorphs ZrO2 and their corresponding mechanical property. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [17]. Copyright 2022 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the space group of three different polymorphs ZrO2 and their corresponding mechanical property. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [17]. Copyright 2022 John Wiley and Sons.
Molecules 28 05428 g001
Molecules 28 05428 g002 550
Figure 2. Annual number of articles published on ZrO2 NPs as indicated by the Scopus database on the date 10 June 2023 (Searched with the keyword “ZrO2 nanoparticles”).
Figure 2. Annual number of articles published on ZrO2 NPs as indicated by the Scopus database on the date 10 June 2023 (Searched with the keyword “ZrO2 nanoparticles”).
Molecules 28 05428 g002
Molecules 28 05428 g003 550
Figure 3. The quantitative antibacterial result of S. aureus colonies incubated at 37 °C for 24 h on sample surface. (a) Ti6Al4V, (b) TiO2, (c) ZrO2/TiO2, and (d) Zn-ZrO2/TiO2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [65]. Copyright 2023 Elsevier.
Figure 3. The quantitative antibacterial result of S. aureus colonies incubated at 37 °C for 24 h on sample surface. (a) Ti6Al4V, (b) TiO2, (c) ZrO2/TiO2, and (d) Zn-ZrO2/TiO2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [65]. Copyright 2023 Elsevier.
Molecules 28 05428 g003
Molecules 28 05428 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM images of the culture ESC on ZrO2/b-TCP composite (Y2O3/b-TCP: 30/70) in different magnifications (A): 250×, (B): 500×, (C): 1000×, and (D): 5000×. Reprinted from Ref. [87].
Figure 4. SEM images of the culture ESC on ZrO2/b-TCP composite (Y2O3/b-TCP: 30/70) in different magnifications (A): 250×, (B): 500×, (C): 1000×, and (D): 5000×. Reprinted from Ref. [87].
Molecules 28 05428 g004
Molecules 28 05428 g005 550
Figure 5. Role of ZrO2 NPs in dental care. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [104]. Copyright 2023 Elsevier.
Figure 5. Role of ZrO2 NPs in dental care. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [104]. Copyright 2023 Elsevier.
Molecules 28 05428 g005
Molecules 28 05428 g006 550
Figure 6. Fabrication as well as detection procedures of the CS-CeO2-ZrO2 nanocomposite-based DNA biosensor. Both the CeO2-ZrO2 particles and CS polymer contribute to the positive charges (+) on the modification layer of CS-CeO2-ZrO2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [116]. Copyright 2023 Elsevier.
Figure 6. Fabrication as well as detection procedures of the CS-CeO2-ZrO2 nanocomposite-based DNA biosensor. Both the CeO2-ZrO2 particles and CS polymer contribute to the positive charges (+) on the modification layer of CS-CeO2-ZrO2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [116]. Copyright 2023 Elsevier.
Molecules 28 05428 g006
Table
Table 1. Antioxidant activity of ZrO2- and ZrO2-based nanomaterials.
Table 1. Antioxidant activity of ZrO2- and ZrO2-based nanomaterials.
MaterialsAssayAntioxidant ActivityRef. No
ZrO2 NPsDPPH63.8%[55]
ZrO2 (6 months’ RT aged)DPPH~86%[56]
Fe3O4-stabilized ZrO2 NPsDPPH~83%[57]
ZrO2/Ag nanocompositeDPPH83.6%[58]
oxidized inulin cross-linked collagen-ZrO2 hybrid scaffoldsDPPH92%[59]
Table
Table 2. The antibacterial activity of some ZrO2 NP-based nanomaterials.
Table 2. The antibacterial activity of some ZrO2 NP-based nanomaterials.
ZrO2 NP-Based NanoMaterials and Their Preparation MethodBacterial StrainAntibacterial ActivityRef.
ZrO2.
Sol–gel approach		S. aureus, B. substilis, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa10 mm, 11 mm, 9 mm, and 7 mm[70]
ZrO2 NPs
Green synthesis		B. subtilis, S. aureus, K. pneumonia, and E. coli14 mm, 13 mm, 15 mm, and 14 mm[71]
ZrO2 NPs and Ag@ZrO2 NCs.
Advanced oxidation processes/hydrothermal treatment.		E. coli and S. AureusE. coli = ~77% inhibition by Ag@ZrO2 NCs and 9% by ZrO2 NPs.
S. aureus MRSA = 76% and 70% inhibition by ZrO2 NPs and Ag@ZrO2 NCs.
S. aureus MSSA = 93% inhibition by both ZrO2 NPs and Ag@ZrO2 NCs. 		[72]
Zr(MoO4)2-ZrO2 nanocomposites.
Coprecipitation method		Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonuas aeruginosa15 mm, 17 mm, and 14 mm by
50 mg/mL		[73]
ZrO2-Amp NPsE. coli and B. cereus18 for E. coli and 17 mm for B. cereus using 30 μg.[74]
Polyindole/ZrO2 nanocomposite.
Solution mixing method		Staphylococcus aureus,
Bacillus subtili,
E. coli,
Salmonella typh,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa		20 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm, 13 mm and 15 mm by 1000 μg.[75]
ZrO2/ZnO/TiO2 nanocomposite-coated SS.
Radio frequency sputtering method		Escherichia coli and
Staphylococcus aureus		81.2% and 72.4%[76]
CeO2/ZrO2 core metal oxide NPs.
Green method		S. aureus and E. coli34 mm and 29 mm[77]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bannunah, A.M. Biomedical Applications of Zirconia-Based Nanomaterials: Challenges and Future Perspectives. Molecules 2023, 28, 5428. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145428

AMA Style

Bannunah AM. Biomedical Applications of Zirconia-Based Nanomaterials: Challenges and Future Perspectives. Molecules. 2023; 28(14):5428. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145428

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bannunah, Azzah M. 2023. "Biomedical Applications of Zirconia-Based Nanomaterials: Challenges and Future Perspectives" Molecules 28, no. 14: 5428. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145428

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop